I don't know if you will read this, but at 22:03, you show dynamic response for systems with equal Xg/Rg=3 but wildly different SCRs (15 vs.3) yet the swing response is almost the same. How is that possible? Wilder swings make sense for the SCR=3 case but what explains the swings for SCR=15, all else being equal? Also at 29:22, you clearly state that the stronger the grid the wilder the oscillations but how is that possible? By definition, a grid is deemed "strong" when disturbances do not cause wild fluctuations, not just having a higher SCR value so your naming convention of what constitutes a strong grid is confusing (I'm based in the US)
I don't know if you will read this, but at 22:03, you show dynamic response for systems with equal Xg/Rg=3 but wildly different SCRs (15 vs.3) yet the swing response is almost the same. How is that possible? Wilder swings make sense for the SCR=3 case but what explains the swings for SCR=15, all else being equal? Also at 29:22, you clearly state that the stronger the grid the wilder the oscillations but how is that possible? By definition, a grid is deemed "strong" when disturbances do not cause wild fluctuations, not just having a higher SCR value so your naming convention of what constitutes a strong grid is confusing (I'm based in the US)
Tried to apply for membership but didn't get any feedback, three times