It doesn't take a genius. Ragebait increases engagement, and engagement means more eyes on the feed which gives more eyes on advertisers that make Meta more money. Its always about money. He doesn't actually believe in free speech.
A mutimillionaire trying to “make amends” with the president (another mutimillionaire) and his new best friend (the richest guy on earth), and people still think Trump’s goverment is going to help the “little guy”. Sad to see that a new wave of global fascism is unraveling right before our eyes and the elites are all for it. Let’s just hope they do less damage than the last time this happened, for humanity’s sake.
By the way, they are multi-Billionaires, not millionaires. $1 million in hundred dollar bills, stack up to about 2 feet. $1 Billion in hundred dollar bills, stack up to 2,000 feet. That's more than 500 feet taller than the Empire State Building.
You do know that the Billionaires are mostly Liberals and Democrats, right? You do know that they are on the same team with the establishment government, mostly Democrats and leftists, right? Trump is the outsider, not a career politician, who most Billionaires hate.
Time to abandon globalistic hard left fantasys. Hatespeech=any speech the socalled elite hates. You are finally exposed, you are done, so you go ahead and remove yourself from the discurs, nobody, not even you, should be forced to do anything.
@@Dslfd no, when you are lying because you are repeating lies without knowing it, you DESERVE to know that you are lying. THere is no freedom to lie, you are free to your opinion, not facts. Fact Checking is by definition checking your facts NOT your OPINION ( which is a held belief)
@@DaleHartley look im not trying to reinvent the wheel here but the best example to this is the Bible a book no one in this planet can fact check but still chooses to believe is true . Some others interpret differently and others decide to not believe. But they all have freedom to choose. The point is we all have freedom to believe in whatever we want
@stevenr.rodriguez9997 There is nothing incorrect about any speech. We should all have the ability to speak our thoughts. If they are untrue, then someone should have the opportunity to debate that. That is how we have civil discourse, and that should be encouraged.
So, next time a politician advices people to drink bleach, some doctor adds a note to the video saying that it is a bad idea and a "patriot911" says it is a great idea, the politician's "community" gets to vote between the two... Did I understand that right? (Sincerely asking as I do not use any social media- other than UA-cam, if one can call it that.)
@@overman2306 Well, it was a colloquial paraphrasing for general example. Not checking a specific fact. If you wish to be pedantic, the exact incident was of a politician asking doctors to investigate the idea of injecting disinfectant into Lungs. (Videos are available on UA-cam, feel free to check.) My question however, remains largely unchanged and unanswered.
@@overman2306 Your are right. I apologise. I am glad to note that you seem to value facts. Lets add a community note to that and find out for a fact, if injecting disinfectant is better than drinking it.
Community notes are a more democratic way to do moderatorship. There should not be a central authority deciding what is a fact and what is allowed to be said.
X is on the way up, and Meta is worried they're headed the way of CNN, CBC... We'll see how true to his most recent word he is with a change in administration.
2025-1-7 DT : At his second press conference after his election on January 7, when asked whether he would use military or economic coercion to "regain" control of the Panama Canal and acquire the Danish territory of Greenland, DT refused to rule out the possibility of taking military or economic action, saying, "I can't guarantee you any of that."
Ban Facebook, and META in EUROPE. Or demand that European Privacy, and anti-hate speech is moderated in Europe. That goes for ALL social networks. We should have our very own European social networks, and stop using anti-democratic US solutions. Boycott the US, but and create European platforms.
If news organisations don't have guests then the sources of information become obscured somewhat. Journalists have to get their information from somewhere, and all information comes with a bit of bias. There's no such thing as just the news. It's up to viewers to have a bit of media literacy, and I don't mind the opinion of a guest, especially if there's a competent anchor who can provide some moderation. DW is particularly good at this. If you're not getting anything out of a segment, you're allowed to stop the video early.
@@Simmo87I think you are wrong. A reporter should let the story guide the outcome regardless what the reporter thinks or belive in….it is the job! Most other people leaves their political views and belives at home when at job so its more norm than not…
Fact checking is truth and fact where Democrat and Republican do not exist nor bias. When fact checking is corrupted then the fault is on the owner and it's not real fact checking..
No, the people who are biased at the ones who get fact checked. Since the RIGHT in the US is the ones feeling hurt...they are the ones who lie more often.
Not true, the socalled factcheckers are part of the globalistic elite who want to ban free speech under the disguise of saving democracy. Anybody who says anything against free speech is a threat to democracy. We are winning, the global elite is loosing (it). Love it!
"Community notes" are better than "fact-check" companies. X has proven that this approach works better. Facts are still being checked, but in a different way; the more decentralized, the better.
I'll be ditching my Facebook account as soon as I tell my friends, and I'll encourage everyone else to do the same. It's going to become another toxic Twitter, which people are deserting in droves.
As time goes by, I'm more and more content that Facebook decided to throw me off its platform for no apparent reason some years ago. It's become an anachronism.
Zuck switching to community notes has no bearing on weather or not Trump is on FB. Trump has stated he has no interest in being on the platform, he is already in office, he doesn’t care.
-why? it's simple money why he want spend millions to other company for fact check while he can do it for free now, the only reason he didn't do it earlier because of government control and lawsuits which could cost hundreds of millions to resolve-
Why social media still a thing ? And I was wondering when his Facebook ever going to shut down I'm sure it won't though. Deleted mine. But I can't delete my messanger though. Because when I'm about to deactivate it it doesn't have the continue to use messenger option 🤦♀️ I'm frustrated with that. It won't fully let me leave. I don't really want people to continue the message me.
😊 nice one-liner, @1:12 : _‘..so draw us a line, what is the connection between the election of donald trump and mark zuckerberg's decision to stop checking facts?’_
yay, finally our Culture ppl won't get censored anymore. like reviews of books🙄🙄 etc the garbage of the censorship. an algorithm to decide what is good and what is not 🤮🤮 " Thank You, Zucky!!"
Do you prefer autocratic, totalitarian Russia, China, or both ruling over Greenland, or a Democratic United States. Not long from now, it will be one of these choices.
Its going to be interesting how the EU will look at this. Its possible EU legislation could ultimately force social media platforms to adopt a specific type of fact checking for EU users. I think the new pres. probs promised so bad news for platforms not bowing to his will.
A community based model is the best we can do. Maybe have moderation teams as a backup. Opening up platforms is inherently Democratic. Let people handle the chaos of the information space. Good on you Mark 👍
Time to limit fb and x on european continent. Facts are essential for people to have accuratual knowlege. Not only (but very important) to development.
It doesn't take a genius. Ragebait increases engagement, and engagement means more eyes on the feed which gives more eyes on advertisers that make Meta more money. Its always about money. He doesn't actually believe in free speech.
Rage bait is free speech. You don't have to engage if you don't want to.
@@HuyHTX Now you have to. It doesnt matter if you "want".
Liberals used to believe in free speech.
Zuck is a liberal who was pressured by the FBI and Democrats to censor conservatives.
stop using Facebook and Instagram.
Doing it right now
Right away
So u rather have ai curate our news ?
Only old people use Facebook
The quality of content on facebook cant degrade much further from what i have seen.
Two words people: Cambridge analytica.
Why? Because president Elon said so.
elon never mention this, trump does. see, u spread misinformation
Community notes > “fact” check
Good
Found the Imgur/Reddit user
They are copying him… that’s what dumps do. Any guy still on Facebook isn’t actually a guy
A mutimillionaire trying to “make amends” with the president (another mutimillionaire) and his new best friend (the richest guy on earth), and people still think Trump’s goverment is going to help the “little guy”. Sad to see that a new wave of global fascism is unraveling right before our eyes and the elites are all for it. Let’s just hope they do less damage than the last time this happened, for humanity’s sake.
By the way, they are multi-Billionaires, not millionaires.
$1 million in hundred dollar bills, stack up to about 2 feet.
$1 Billion in hundred dollar bills, stack up to 2,000 feet.
That's more than 500 feet taller than the Empire State Building.
Multi billionaire.
You do know that the Billionaires are mostly Liberals and Democrats, right?
You do know that they are on the same team with the establishment government, mostly Democrats and leftists, right?
Trump is the outsider, not a career politician, who most Billionaires hate.
Most Billionaires are not Trump supporters.
Guess which side the Billionaires are on?
There's no such thing as an 'expert in misinformation'
She looks more like an expert in fast food
@@colinhiggins4779 lol yeah
Zuckerberg is a spineless individual and people should simply scrap Facebook. I did years ago.
I have never opened facebook or instagram account , and not planning to do so . Waist of time in my view
Meta is DEAD !
I hope so!
What a huge middle finger to the senate.
Time to abandon social media
Go right ahead 👍
Time to abandon globalistic hard left fantasys. Hatespeech=any speech the socalled elite hates. You are finally exposed, you are done, so you go ahead and remove yourself from the discurs, nobody, not even you, should be forced to do anything.
Think harder…cause that wont happen, too many people are addicted
Bye
Bye
That is just great. Now, we can have more outright lies.
Different opinions aren’t lies , a government that silence others opinions is the real danger
@@Dslfd That is correct. But posts aren't always just differing opinions. Some are outright lies.
@@Dstinct that is true . But everyone has the right to decide independently of other opinions in what to believe .
@@Dslfd no, when you are lying because you are repeating lies without knowing it, you DESERVE to know that you are lying. THere is no freedom to lie, you are free to your opinion, not facts. Fact Checking is by definition checking your facts NOT your OPINION ( which is a held belief)
@@DaleHartley look im not trying to reinvent the wheel here but the best example to this is the Bible a book no one in this planet can fact check but still chooses to believe is true . Some others interpret differently and others decide to not believe. But they all have freedom to choose. The point is we all have freedom to believe in whatever we want
"the art of political doublespeak" Fact checking equals censorship.
Aren’t there laws that forbids spreading lies, slander?
Just trying to hang on to the last audience still using Facebook.
Dump social networks and get a real life instead.
Where you will get information and news?
@Oliver-cv6pv the news that we're all watching now
@@montega.
You are watching them on UA-cam, a social media.
@Oliver-cv6pv Yeah but I can watch DW news without UA-cam. Any major news corp on YT also has its own website, app or television stream.
@Oliver-cv6pv Yeah but any news corps found on YT, like DW, are also going to be available through their own websites, apps or tv streaming
Because freedom means free speech even if it is speech you disagree with.
But it also means objectively incorrect speech, who will now be given a platform without any easy, streamlined way to disprove it.
@stevenr.rodriguez9997 There is nothing incorrect about any speech. We should all have the ability to speak our thoughts. If they are untrue, then someone should have the opportunity to debate that. That is how we have civil discourse, and that should be encouraged.
Defending the right to spread lies and slander on Facebook . BUT if I do so on this forum I would be banned . Hypocrites
So, next time a politician advices people to drink bleach, some doctor adds a note to the video saying that it is a bad idea and a "patriot911" says it is a great idea, the politician's "community" gets to vote between the two...
Did I understand that right?
(Sincerely asking as I do not use any social media- other than UA-cam, if one can call it that.)
He never said that. This is an example of bias in fact checking.
@@overman2306 Well, it was a colloquial paraphrasing for general example. Not checking a specific fact.
If you wish to be pedantic, the exact incident was of a politician asking doctors to investigate the idea of injecting disinfectant into Lungs.
(Videos are available on UA-cam, feel free to check.)
My question however, remains largely unchanged and unanswered.
@@ignorasmus Paraphrasing is not using facts. The word 'drink' was never used. You can't call someone pedantic for that.
@@overman2306 Your are right.
I apologise.
I am glad to note that you seem to value facts.
Lets add a community note to that and find out for a fact, if injecting disinfectant is better than drinking it.
FACT Checking is NOT censorship
After doing so called "fact checking" by politically aligned , removing the content is censorship.
"the art of political doublespeak" Fact checking equals censorship.
Community notes work far better that top down, absolutist “facts” from some anonymous employee
Oh wow.. FB doing free speech? Lol
It’s not free speech, it’s free disinformation and lies.
Community notes are a more democratic way to do moderatorship. There should not be a central authority deciding what is a fact and what is allowed to be said.
Zuckerberg is such a weasel
The main question is not fact checking, but when will the censorship on UA-cam of opinions that deviate from the propagated policies stop?
Unbelievable.
Wonder what trump has on Zuckerberg
Executive orders
nothing, it is his boss that is directing this.
X is on the way up, and Meta is worried they're headed the way of CNN, CBC... We'll see how true to his most recent word he is with a change in administration.
@@csn10
Twitter after the recent elections lost tens of thousands of users, what are you on?
5:16 good gracious
2025-1-7 DT :
At his second press conference after his election on January 7, when asked whether he would use military or economic coercion to "regain" control of the Panama Canal and acquire the Danish territory of Greenland, DT refused to rule out the possibility of taking military or economic action, saying, "I can't guarantee you any of that."
Dude the haost sounds like Trician takanawa (monotone wise, and not as nasal)
Ban Facebook, and META in EUROPE. Or demand that European Privacy, and anti-hate speech is moderated in Europe. That goes for ALL social networks. We should have our very own European social networks, and stop using anti-democratic US solutions. Boycott the US, but and create European platforms.
Where are the real business leaders? These gutless weaklings, “Don’t take my money!” Sickening
Just report the news. Nobody needs your biased guests and their “opinions”.
All news is biased, don't kid yourself
If news organisations don't have guests then the sources of information become obscured somewhat. Journalists have to get their information from somewhere, and all information comes with a bit of bias. There's no such thing as just the news. It's up to viewers to have a bit of media literacy, and I don't mind the opinion of a guest, especially if there's a competent anchor who can provide some moderation. DW is particularly good at this. If you're not getting anything out of a segment, you're allowed to stop the video early.
@@Simmo87I think you are wrong. A reporter should let the story guide the outcome regardless what the reporter thinks or belive in….it is the job! Most other people leaves their political views and belives at home when at job so its more norm than not…
Fact checking is truth and fact where Democrat and Republican do not exist nor bias.
When fact checking is corrupted then the fault is on the owner
and it's not real fact checking..
"Fact checkers" are biased. Who fact-checks the "fact checkers"?
anyone. true fact checkers base it on verifiable data.
No, the people who are biased at the ones who get fact checked. Since the RIGHT in the US is the ones feeling hurt...they are the ones who lie more often.
Facts don't have a bias. People like you who believe in 'alternative facts' take your bias all the way to delusional.
Not true, the socalled factcheckers are part of the globalistic elite who want to ban free speech under the disguise of saving democracy. Anybody who says anything against free speech is a threat to democracy. We are winning, the global elite is loosing (it). Love it!
Well you couldn't be trusted to read a book
Just as deep fakes are becoming near impossible to detect.
"Community notes" are better than "fact-check" companies. X has proven that this approach works better. Facts are still being checked, but in a different way; the more decentralized, the better.
expert on disinformation spreading disinformation 😂
I'll be ditching my Facebook account as soon as I tell my friends, and I'll encourage everyone else to do the same. It's going to become another toxic Twitter, which people are deserting in droves.
i gues he means free expresion of scam, FB is full of money scams
As time goes by, I'm more and more content that Facebook decided to throw me off its platform for no apparent reason some years ago. It's become an anachronism.
Anyone else pick up on the anti-Trump Liberal twist commentary?
It was the only point. As the "expert" said explicitly, the censorship was implemented to suppress Trump's opinions.
The gal at the end has a nonsensical answer at 7:16
Zuck switching to community notes has no bearing on weather or not Trump is on FB. Trump has stated he has no interest in being on the platform, he is already in office, he doesn’t care.
Welcome to post truth era, where ignorance is strength 👁
-why? it's simple money why he want spend millions to other company for fact check while he can do it for free now, the only reason he didn't do it earlier because of government control and lawsuits which could cost hundreds of millions to resolve-
This lady loses a lot of credibility saying 'Ultimate Fighting Championship' lol would she say Lebron plays in the National basketball Association?
Nice to see some sanity being restored
Trump asked him, so he complies
That woman who said Trump is lying is the biggest liberal lair here
Why social media still a thing ? And I was wondering when his Facebook ever going to shut down I'm sure it won't though. Deleted mine. But I can't delete my messanger though. Because when I'm about to deactivate it it doesn't have the continue to use messenger option 🤦♀️ I'm frustrated with that. It won't fully let me leave. I don't really want people to continue the message me.
Why? Because he has no backbone.
It’s all about money honey…
😊 nice one-liner, @1:12 : _‘..so draw us a line, what is the connection between the election of donald trump and mark zuckerberg's decision to stop checking facts?’_
Great! I mean, UA-cam doesn’t have too much fact checking, and now they too. Yet I don’t think he does it sincerely. But if it’s fine, it is fine.
yay, finally our Culture ppl won't get censored anymore. like reviews of books🙄🙄 etc the garbage of the censorship. an algorithm to decide what is good and what is not 🤮🤮 " Thank You, Zucky!!"
Do you prefer autocratic, totalitarian Russia, China, or both ruling over Greenland, or a Democratic United States. Not long from now, it will be one of these choices.
Back to your roots being Fakebook
A little bit too late Marky old. You missed the train. You didn't give two craps and a piss about censoring people. Kick Bricks.
From Facebook to fox news.
WTF WAS THAT THING AT THE END??!!! ITS CALLED JOHN??? TF
Is it German or African public service?!
Pretty sure you mean “the changes are an effort to rebalance from far left extremism to centre balance”
Its going to be interesting how the EU will look at this. Its possible EU legislation could ultimately force social media platforms to adopt a specific type of fact checking for EU users. I think the new pres. probs promised so bad news for platforms not bowing to his will.
I hope the EU will take this seriously and won't hold back against these big tech firms which have become too powerful and ignore the rules and laws.
@@markuserikssen It does. the company maintenance the old moderation in the EU. (Only know this since about an hour or so)
The only reasonable thing that EU should do is to ban all meta platforms and Twitter.
facts do not increase the bottom line.. : /
May the universe thwart all their plans 🙄🙄
The last nail in the coffin of democracy
coffin of the power of ur party
Yes and why more people don’t get this is astounding. These billionaire social media owners are anti democratic to the max.
No, here in Europe we still have democracy, yes, the far right is gaining more popularity, but we are fighting.
1:44 She looks like she's having a hard time talking.
Delete wiki aswell
grimace is pretty frumpadump
A community based model is the best we can do. Maybe have moderation teams as a backup. Opening up platforms is inherently Democratic. Let people handle the chaos of the information space. Good on you Mark 👍
Probably the same reason why he’s thinks he looks good 😂 he’s INSANE
Freedom of Speech
did you know that freedom of speech is not freedom to lie? ;)
Oh look! A 'free speech' obsessive on the internet. Who would have thought?
@@DaleHartley Are you confused by Far-Chi? lol
@@bugsygoo bot
@@jnyfumare I am not the confused one bud :)
Time to limit fb and x on european continent. Facts are essential for people to have accuratual knowlege. Not only (but very important) to development.
He's caving before Trump. A pitty of a man, Mark , nothing new though.
Hmm convenient right before trumps term...
Bu the way, you might want to do something about that hair
Can you say who’s your daddy?
Oh, DW the most well-funded news company and with a team of youtube comment censorers doesn't like this one bit. Not one bit.
Hooray! Meta finally gets it. I hope they stand firm on it. Now it's youtube's turn to get off that authoritarian truth arbitrer & speech censorship
Free speech😂😂How hypocritical you are
blaming it on Zuckerberg is avoiding your responsibility, lady
Ouch
If truth was censored half of DW reporting would be off the air 😂 as well as most media.
Kiss the Ring
LOVE TRUMP
The end of censorship has got to be a big disappointment for the folks at DW. It's just facebook, DW can carry on as usual. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Trash interview
💰💰💰👺
Haha hahaha hahahahaha money! Ahem. Excuse me.
State supervision of all portals, tougher penalties for hate postings and others.
Lord