I can't tell the $3000.00 difference.....buy 4 Privias for your friends, and a can of red spray paint...you will be the toast of the town, or buy The Nord and be super cool and broke...but hey you look and sound great. Love them both for what they are, something for everyone at every price point. Thanks, great video
Love this youtube clip!!!! Sound is VERY VERY subjective, as is Brand image to many musicians. The question should be "Which sound is better in your opinion?" 1 or 2? The answers to "Where is Casio, where is Nord?" Is not subjective. It is fact. 1 is Casio 2 is Nord. I love both of them! However if I had to carry either one up 10 flights of stairs I'd use the Casio, cos it's a fraction of the weight. If I accidentally dropped one down the stairs I'd prefer the Casio, cos it would be a fraction of the cost to replace! I prefer the Nord for Hammond type sounds, but prefer the piano action on the Casio. I did not post this for people to argue with me, my personal opinion is mine. Yours may be different and you are welcome to have a different opinion than me, but that does not make my opinion wrong.
Thank you, Yuriy, for this. To my ears the 1st (must be the Casio) seems artificial, 'hollow' and very 1-0-0-1-1 digital (as if it does not have enough sample quality, almost like the old sampling on the Commodore computers) while the 2nd (which must be the Nord) is much more natural sounding, quite close to a real piano.
The sample quality is just fine, physics related. It's just a different sample, and more mellow. Nord is less mellow, but also more tinny on the higher end.
The second I would guess was the Nord as the sound was much more full in heavier tones. Both sound great, but the 5s is significantly cheaper than the Nord, so it’s a great buy.
Satisfied Casio Privia user here for 4 yrs and I would still prefer no. 2, which is the Nord. I would only get it though if my budget for buying a keyboard is subsidized. And that's why I'm using a Casio.
Great idea! Casio #1, Nord #2. #2 sounds more expanded, a bit more aggressive to me, not so natural. When could we expect the results from this quiz? :)
Definitly second one. Sound is more realistic, softer and deeper. (a'm not professional, but I like piano sound very much and i was thinking about buying some kind of electronic piano earlier to. So, if it was the same price, i would buy the second one. But if it was more expensive than first one and i wouldn't have enough money, i'd prefer to spend a little bit more time to collect required among of money and buy the second one whatever.) So thank you for that comparison. I liked it.
I like 1 for the higher range (the lower range isn't bad either) and 2 for the mid and lower ranges. 2's upper range sounds too tinny to me. However, that means for most of the range, I like 1 better. So I pick 1. I see that I posted the same preference 1 month ago. The answer is provided in Yuriy's response to my earlier comment. I'm surprised by the answer but that's a good surprise. ;)
Eu tenho o Casio privia px5s....e falo sem medo de errar é um dos melhores stage piano do mercado, perceberam no teste q os sons até parecem ser um pouco mais superior q o nord...
Verdade, ainda não tenho o px 5s mas dá pra ouvir que quem está tocando se cansa e já não consegue tocar com a mesma força e o som dos dois fica barrela, kkk... não é um piano que molda um músico mas sim um músico que molda um piano, não é a roupa que molda uma pessoa mas sim a pessoa que molda a roupa, ja vi vários vídeos do px5s e a maioria dos que tocam me desanimaram mas outros mostraram a força e resposta do teclado!
Casio sounds more natural, better release samples as well. But Nord more constrained sound is designed to cut through the mix when playing with a band.
#2 is Number better. #1 modulates and pans the samples more, which means they would have to tempo sync'd to sound good with other instruments, listen to the end of the video.
Os agudos do cassio sao extremamentes realista. O nord nem tanto. Muita gente da valor a um grave extremo, mas tudo que um pianista quer é suavisar os graves e deixar a melodia aparecer...
quanto mais agudo menos realista, perde a suavidade !!o extremo disso era aqueles pianos dos Roland xp30,JV90 fica um som meio enlatado! outra que o nord stage tem um excelente equaliador para fazer as mudanças de acordo com seu gosto em tempo real,só girar botão!1
The first one has the "strength" of Steinway-samples. The second one has more "color" and resonance. Its samples seem to be from a european source. Both sound great - and never forget: Our fingers make music, not samples. Go for the cheaper one, I would suggest.
+Loddar007 Casio has a great piano and not bad rhodes, organs, strings etc... But Nord has great piano, great hammonds, great rhodes, great sample player, and great usability ;) Nord is Nord :)
+Yash Chauhan yes the number 1 is the px-5s. i have both of them. and this comparison is not a joke. this is true some people dont admit the fact that casio px is better than the nord. for the price, casio is the winner. both keyboards are great but if u wana save money get the casio and it does the job.
No idea which is which but I prefer #1 in all samples except the low end chord where it got muddy and lost clarity. #2 was a little too bright and spacious for my taste, but if you played either in isolation it would still sound beautiful.
I agree with most of comments : #2, Nord, is a lttle bit better but I hink that difference comes not from quality samples but sound treatment ( reverb, stereo effect, etc )
#2 sounds a bit more "boxy" to my ear than #1. I bet this could be compensated for with EQ though.....amazing the "bang for the buck" the Px5S provides to sound this comparable to a keyboard that cost 3x as much....
I don't think anyone is saying that a Casio Privia is made at the same quality price point as the beautifully made and executed Nord. What this awesome comparison does show is how comparable the piano samples really are on these 2 models. Casio Privia has developed a serious instrument for a pittance. Both of these sounds are better than most of the competition to my ear. I auditioned many stage pianos this month and was most impressed by the Nord, Roland models and yes privias. The biggest revelation to me is that not only is this 1000 dollar model this amazing but the samples in the 499 dollar PX 160 are using the same exact technology as the PX 5 S!! Yes ,you get this level of sound, minus many features) for under 500 dollars. Yeah, mine, is on the way.Tom
They are both very good. I'm inclined to say that number 1 is the Casio, I own a Privia 335 and just love the Grand sounds it has. Such a big sound. Then again, number 2 sounds like a Casio Grand as well. I give up. Which is which?
I did not find the answer of Yuriy, but I dislike the tonality of No. 2. The mid range is too domindant to me, and heavy sounding. I guess Casio is No. 1, also it sounds better and overall much more pleasing to my ears.
All of you Saying PX5s looks like a Toy? for real? I would rather have a TOY LOOKING (based on your tastes) keyboards that is lighter and definitely dollar thousands cheaper, and use the remaining money I have and buy me a Car. Just talking about practicality. But based on the Sound Comparison, definitely I would still go with Casio PX5s..
for a good comparison, I assumed you use the same MIDI recording file for both. For me #2 is a clear winner by a WIDE margin.. and it should be the Nord.. #1 piano sound plastic, unnatural & piercing my ear, #1 also become cleary weak in comparison to #2 when they're tested how to perform in a gradually stronger touch test (p to fff) at the end of this video
All of you saying #2 (Nord) Sounds better than #1 (Casio) need to have your hearing checked. The Casio sounds full and realistic. The Nord Sounds thin and cheap. I'm a Yamaha guy btw, so this was an unbiased assessment.
1casio, 2nord. Casio is always brighter for some reason and just doesn't have the expressive depth though it does sound amazing. I prefer bird but I afford Casio
1 - касио, 2 - норд. Длина сэмпла абсолютно разная. Послушайте окончание длинных нот в среднем и нижнем регистре. Стейдж до конца звучания резонирует а у касио все хвосты зацикленные слишком рано, слышно сразу. Эконом-вариант такой. Если сравнивать, то с хотя бы с роландом рояльным или кроносом тем же. С касио немного некорректно. Это если по чесноку, но если не слышишь разницы - конечно, стоит брать касио. Опять же, если слушать во встроенных колонках, будет почти одинаково. Но на мониторах или в нормальных наушниках, ребят ну серьезно))) сам не любитель нордов, но тут уж явное преимущество.
#1 Casio #2 Nord Nord sound is slightly different (it's better). It sounds deeper and with more presence on mid keys, getting much closer to a real acoustic piano. Still, Casio sound is also really good and I would certainly buy one for my setup.
Wow. I was pretty sure that the 1st one must be the nordd, since it sounds so rich and powerful, and I've almost considered not getting the Casio PX5S. The second one (nord) is so plastic and unnatural compared to the first (Casio), that it's not even funny.
Меня приколол Nord... Если это номер 2) Хотя у самого Yamaha Motif XS , Korg KronosX и Kurzweil PC88X. Но Nord прикурил бы ради плотного рояля, пробивного)
Пиано №2 более натурально. Оно "честнее", богаче нюансами, и звучит явно "дороже". В то же время, №1, вероятно, будет выигрышно звучать в миксе, в ансамбле. В общем, моя версия: №1 - Casio
No fim das contas a equalização do nord parece ter ganhos nos médios o que deixa o som mais ardido. Pra quem não gosta de som assim, vai preferir o Casio.
OK, I found where you told which is which! I noticed that, with the Casio, your softest notes were louder that the Nord, most of the time. Is that your playing, the keybed action, or a limitation of the Casio? (Thanks so much for your comparison!!!)
I kept the 3k and bought the casio... I noticed the same thing on my first play. Dug into menus and found different velocity settings that helped. I suspect that the nord keybed is better, but the casio is better than my old Yamaha p-200. 24lbs carrying weight... well.. My K2600 weighs 56lbs... 87 in its ata road case.
El primero es el Casio PX 5S, el segundo es un piano Nord que mi PX5S reproduce fielmente desde su motor, no es por sampleo...pero los tres sensores y el sistema de resonancia como así el de frecuencia de este Casio es superior al poderoso motor del Nord, es decir este Casio usa las mismas tomas del Steinway que el kursweil forte, pero sus sensores táctiles son superiores, tanto así a las teclas "Fatar" de Nord y el K Forte que ahí es por donde pierden. Después por lo demás en funciones es superior el Nord pero en lo que respecta a piano y pianos electrónicos pensándolo en bruto es superior el Casio.
@@a__-yg7vz ponele, si no lo conoces en profundidad, después en lo tecnológico no te lo discuto y el nord es hermoso pero en sonido Salvo los Hammond, después no hay diferencia...y está más que demostrado amigo...80000$ contra 250000$. Por supuesto que el Nord es considerado una marca profesional al lado del Casio pero aún así ya demostró estar a su altura más allá de la marca.
@@a__-yg7vz sería algo así como comparar David contra Goliad...y es a lo que apunta el vídeo. Y que no hace falta gastar una fortuna para tener un sonido de nivel profesional.
@@AlmaSofi2704 yo tuve los 2 pianos, y puedo decir que nunca estuve satisfecho con el sonido que tenia el casio. en las presentaciones en línea, stereo, sacandole lo mejor que podia... se oye considerablemente artificial, siempre sentía eso (tuve un tiempo un korg, y me paso la misma impresion). pero no tengo defectos que apuntar al nord stage, de verdad. la calidad del sonido es superior. el Wurlitizer de nord es hermoso, igual los electric piano. los de casio no me suenan a su altura de ninguna manera Y asi es con precios. cuando llegas a una determinada calidad de productos, el "poquito mejor" (si asi lo ves) sale mucho más caro. si no quieres invertir eso, es tu decision, pero creo que no ganes mucho en hacerte creer que no hay mucha diferencia. de mi perspectiva, valió la pena dejar el casio
I'm playing on a toy with batteries . wich woman didnt try this ? Oke...... I have a Hammond toonwiel with 960 leslie , expensive big and heavy....my Roland Prelude, cheap little and light ,it has very good Hammond sounds and even for records I use it more then my Hammond . For using a grand piano I had to buy one , so going to the shop and took 1 hour for it. Even my favo Yamaha couldnt convince me and tatataaaaaaa...the Nord , yes...o happy days. Pling pling pling ehhhhh..pling pling. Hmmmmm ...back to Casio ( thats the brand name of watches yet ? )...pling jazz pling classic. Sir , whats the price ? 733euro ? 800dollar. Things chances and more and more product looking and sounding the same , even in cars ( Kia ) .
2. Casio 100% т.к. у касио ужасно короткие семплы что делает игру классики невозможным. Такая же беда и на новой модели S100. А вот 1. Это Nord - ломучие не надежные инструменты маленькой компании как и Kurzweil
ypstudio makes me glad I bought a new px 5s a few weeks ago without shopping. I heard it and the price at 899.00 was in my range. I totally love the distorted organ sound on this thing as well.
what???? i knew in an instant no. 1 was casio - i have a casio at home it has such a distinctive sound you'd hae to be deaf not to hear it. Speaking of sound quality, nord sounds way better, but it's up to everyone's taste, of course.
1 = casio , 2 = Nord Casio sounds like beginner's keyboards. Even the most expensive casio pianos is far far way from a real piano. Nord 2 is better, but still digital sound. For me, Today Nord Piano 3 have the most realistic sound between all digital pianos on the market. After Nord Piano 3, Rolad RD700 is the best. My opinion!
Call the 'review' whatever you want. It is all written for the reviewer to sit back and chuckle, knowing s/he's the "only one who knows" -- this whole review is just a load of garbage!!!!!
+tkarlmann You can look another youtube video with PX-5s or Nord Stage 2. And compare their sounds. Because on this video Nord is Nord, and Casio is Casio. :) I have a nord, and i played casio px-5s, and this is like that. If you don't believe me, you can search all youtube BLIND sound tests and write comments like "fake, garbage, you waste my time" :)
+tkarlmann Sorry, guys! I'm the sort that likes to know the instrument, then judge the review. I'm beginning to appreciate your "blind" idea. The very fact that you would compare these two speaks well of the Casio.
O Casio é uma praga mesmo , devia ser direito no Brasil de podermos metermos fogo nessa porcaria onde encontrarmos um Casio e não importa de quem fosse , mas infelizmente uma coisa boa dessa nunca acontecerá por aqui 😒
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I can't tell the $3000.00 difference.....buy 4 Privias for your friends, and a can of red spray paint...you will be the toast of the town, or buy The Nord and be super cool and broke...but hey you look and sound great. Love them both for what they are, something for everyone at every price point. Thanks, great video
Mike Stroud ua-cam.com/video/eB2tlo6fGCo/v-deo.html
U are on D money my friend
In my opinion there are some realistic details that no one has except for Nord
Love this youtube clip!!!! Sound is VERY VERY subjective, as is Brand image to many musicians. The question should be "Which sound is better in your opinion?" 1 or 2? The answers to "Where is Casio, where is Nord?" Is not subjective. It is fact. 1 is Casio 2 is Nord. I love both of them! However if I had to carry either one up 10 flights of stairs I'd use the Casio, cos it's a fraction of the weight. If I accidentally dropped one down the stairs I'd prefer the Casio, cos it would be a fraction of the cost to replace! I prefer the Nord for Hammond type sounds, but prefer the piano action on the Casio.
I did not post this for people to argue with me, my personal opinion is mine. Yours may be different and you are welcome to have a different opinion than me, but that does not make my opinion wrong.
Thank you, Yuriy, for this.
To my ears the 1st (must be the Casio) seems artificial, 'hollow' and very 1-0-0-1-1 digital (as if it does not have enough sample quality, almost like the old sampling on the Commodore computers) while the 2nd (which must be the Nord) is much more natural sounding, quite close to a real piano.
The sample quality is just fine, physics related. It's just a different sample, and more mellow. Nord is less mellow, but also more tinny on the higher end.
The second I would guess was the Nord as the sound was much more full in heavier tones. Both sound great, but the 5s is significantly cheaper than the Nord, so it’s a great buy.
both are good at what it claims to do, I think the deciding factor should be the pocket.
People who think Casio was better never listened enough of an acoustic piano. Nord is much more natural.
they both sound good. but, I'm impress with casio now. looking into buying it. thanks!!
what preset was used for px 5 s?I guess the concert grand.Anyway,great keyboard at its price,lots of things to explore besides piano.
Satisfied Casio Privia user here for 4 yrs and I would still prefer no. 2, which is the Nord. I would only get it though if my budget for buying a keyboard is subsidized. And that's why I'm using a Casio.
Voting for #1. It seems being more natural and rich, though #2 is more bright and... digital)
Andrey Sklyarov Would you have imagined it's the Casio?
@@JanPrze Oh boy I'm going for this piano rn!!
Great idea!
Casio #1, Nord #2. #2 sounds more expanded, a bit more aggressive to me, not so natural.
When could we expect the results from this quiz? :)
Definitly second one.
Sound is more realistic, softer and deeper. (a'm not professional, but I like piano sound very much and i was thinking about buying some kind of electronic piano earlier to. So, if it was the same price, i would buy the second one. But if it was more expensive than first one and i wouldn't have enough money, i'd prefer to spend a little bit more time to collect required among of money and buy the second one whatever.)
So thank you for that comparison. I liked it.
Casio has more realism.
I like 1 for the higher range (the lower range isn't bad either) and 2 for the mid and lower ranges. 2's upper range sounds too tinny to me. However, that means for most of the range, I like 1 better. So I pick 1. I see that I posted the same preference 1 month ago. The answer is provided in Yuriy's response to my earlier comment. I'm surprised by the answer but that's a good surprise. ;)
Where the hell is the actual answer?
1 is the casio apparently.
Eu tenho o Casio privia px5s....e falo sem medo de errar é um dos melhores stage piano do mercado, perceberam no teste q os sons até parecem ser um pouco mais superior q o nord...
Verdade, ainda não tenho o px 5s mas dá pra ouvir que quem está tocando se cansa e já não consegue tocar com a mesma força e o som dos dois fica barrela, kkk... não é um piano que molda um músico mas sim um músico que molda um piano, não é a roupa que molda uma pessoa mas sim a pessoa que molda a roupa, ja vi vários vídeos do px5s e a maioria dos que tocam me desanimaram mas outros mostraram a força e resposta do teclado!
Para mano! Px5s é bom, mas não é som de timbre que o Nord leva a melhor. Obs: eu tenho um PX5S
@@CarlosRocha-é minha opinião mano....
@@jorgegregorinogueirarosset5934 PX 5S quando vai pro PA morre! Som sem punch!
Congratulation , Casio beautyful sound !!!
Would you please let us know officially which piano is which. That would be great. Thank you!
The first is Casio the second is Nord.. I have both
This just confirms my plan to buy the Casio PX 560 which is even more versatile. The Casio piano sound is richer than the Nord.
lol
I would be happy with either one!
Casio sounds more natural, better release samples as well. But Nord more constrained sound is designed to cut through the mix when playing with a band.
Thx for the comparison
Gostei mais do 1, sou fã do Casio tomara que seja ele o primeiro.
Casio px 5 s is a really respetc ablesynth with great features.And piano sound difference is minor.Prace range difference is huge.
I like #2 better. Assuming that the more expensive Nord has the better sound, I guess nord is #2.
#2 is Number better. #1 modulates and pans the samples more, which means they would have to tempo sync'd to sound good with other instruments, listen to the end of the video.
Bom dia Yuriy. O 2 parece me melhor. Se for casio, admirável. Parabéns pelo trabalho.
Leck Filho 2 e o nord stage...nao se compara casio com nord...mesmo esse sendo top de linha da casio ainda nao se equipara ao nord stage...
@@fernandodg5886 mas pq não se compara? Pq o Casio é mais barato?
@@fernandodg5886tenho Nord e tenho Px5s, vc não faz ideia do que está falando!
Os agudos do cassio sao extremamentes realista. O nord nem tanto. Muita gente da valor a um grave extremo, mas tudo que um pianista quer é suavisar os graves e deixar a melodia aparecer...
quanto mais agudo menos realista, perde a suavidade !!o extremo disso era aqueles pianos dos Roland xp30,JV90 fica um som meio enlatado! outra que o nord stage tem um excelente equaliador para fazer as mudanças de acordo com seu gosto em tempo real,só girar botão!1
Ok so which is which? They sound very very close. I think the 1 sounds slightly better most times but it is so crazy close to each other
The first one has the "strength" of Steinway-samples. The second one has more "color" and resonance. Its samples seem to be from a european source. Both sound great - and never forget: Our fingers make music, not samples. Go for the cheaper one, I would suggest.
+Loddar007 Casio has a great piano and not bad rhodes, organs, strings etc... But Nord has great piano, great hammonds, great rhodes, great sample player, and great usability ;) Nord is Nord :)
+ypstudio this is true
+Loddar007 #1 is the PX-5s
+Yash Chauhan yes the number 1 is the px-5s. i have both of them. and this comparison is not a joke. this is true some people dont admit the fact that casio px is better than the nord. for the price, casio is the winner. both keyboards are great but if u wana save money get the casio and it does the job.
The only advantage of the nord is the organ sounds.
I came here for the answer of ctk 4400 and e243 video...as you said to check next video...ans plz!!
Well, how about that? A Casio that seems to have caught up with Roland for sound.
No idea which is which but I prefer #1 in all samples except the low end chord where it got muddy and lost clarity. #2 was a little too bright and spacious for my taste, but if you played either in isolation it would still sound beautiful.
I agree with most of comments : #2, Nord, is a lttle bit better but I hink that difference comes not from quality samples but sound treatment ( reverb, stereo effect, etc )
#1 casio
# 2 nord
thats what it sounded like for me, for sure nord is the best, but casio is still usefull.
#2 sounds a bit more "boxy" to my ear than #1. I bet this could be compensated for with EQ though.....amazing the "bang for the buck" the Px5S provides to sound this comparable to a keyboard that cost 3x as much....
I picked #1. Turns out it's the Casio. I'll be buying 1.
I don't think anyone is saying that a Casio Privia is made at the same quality price point as the beautifully made and executed Nord. What this awesome comparison does show is how comparable the piano samples really are on these 2 models. Casio Privia has developed a serious instrument for a pittance. Both of these sounds are better than most of the competition to my ear. I auditioned many stage pianos this month and was most impressed by the Nord, Roland models and yes privias. The biggest revelation to me is that not only is this 1000 dollar model this amazing but the samples in the 499 dollar PX 160 are using the same exact technology as the PX 5 S!! Yes ,you get this level of sound, minus many features) for under 500 dollars. Yeah, mine, is on the way.Tom
Can someone plz tell the chords in the first 20 seconds? Thx a lot.
The volumes settings are different, the Nord is louder.
But the casio is as good as the Nord.
i prefer the cheaper ones..
They are both very good. I'm inclined to say that number 1 is the Casio, I own a Privia 335 and just love the Grand sounds it has. Such a big sound. Then again, number 2 sounds like a Casio Grand as well. I give up. Which is which?
1 = casio, 2 = nord
It adds a bunch of features I don't want. I'll stick with the px5s
NORD SO TEM PREÇO, VENDI MEU ELECTRO 3 E CONPREI O PRIVIA PX5S
Puts que furada hein, um Eletro bem programado destrói o PX5s.. imagina o Nord Stage
@@300wil electro 3 e Ruin
Casio #1, Nord #2. I’m not crazy about the Casio response after you dig into it. The Nord maintains its richness in all dynamics levels.
Ummm... Which is which? That would be helpful.
I did not find the answer of Yuriy, but I dislike the tonality of No. 2. The mid range is too domindant to me, and heavy sounding. I guess Casio is No. 1, also it sounds better and overall much more pleasing to my ears.
All of you Saying PX5s looks like a Toy? for real? I would rather have a TOY LOOKING (based on your tastes) keyboards that is lighter and definitely dollar thousands cheaper, and use the remaining money I have and buy me a Car. Just talking about practicality.
But based on the Sound Comparison, definitely I would still go with Casio PX5s..
+Sassy Thirdy exactly!!! and it looks nothing like a toy, it looks like and is a Pro level instrument.
+Sassy The answer! ionika.com.ua/ru/page/px5svsnordstage2
+thomas grim You're right! Last year someone of a professional band came to me and said :"Man, that looks spacy!"
#2 was consistently better. So, which one is that?
Highly comparable in sound, huge difference in price... The #1 warmth wins in average, and I think it’s the Casio
for a good comparison, I assumed you use the same MIDI recording file for both. For me #2 is a clear winner by a WIDE margin.. and it should be the Nord.. #1 piano sound plastic, unnatural & piercing my ear, #1 also become cleary weak in comparison to #2 when they're tested how to perform in a gradually stronger touch test (p to fff) at the end of this video
All of you saying #2 (Nord) Sounds better than #1 (Casio) need to have your hearing checked. The Casio sounds full and realistic. The Nord Sounds thin and cheap. I'm a Yamaha guy btw, so this was an unbiased assessment.
The 2nd piano sounds better to me. It had a richer sound.
1casio, 2nord. Casio is always brighter for some reason and just doesn't have the expressive depth though it does sound amazing. I prefer bird but I afford Casio
which stage setting use In Privia Px 5s????
don't remember.. Just look at manual )
you use presets of factory ?... ConcertGrand ? ?? is the 0-0 .... Have much sounds of piano ....
I sold PX5s 3 years ago. Don't remember it, sorry
Good night I would like to know which piano is the Casio
So? Which is Nord and which is Casio? I think the first (1.) is Casio and the second is Nord. Am I right? Is it correct?
that`s right perfect
What happened!?
What piano?
😢
отличное сравнение
1 - касио, 2 - норд. Длина сэмпла абсолютно разная. Послушайте окончание длинных нот в среднем и нижнем регистре. Стейдж до конца звучания резонирует а у касио все хвосты зацикленные слишком рано, слышно сразу. Эконом-вариант такой. Если сравнивать, то с хотя бы с роландом рояльным или кроносом тем же. С касио немного некорректно. Это если по чесноку, но если не слышишь разницы - конечно, стоит брать касио. Опять же, если слушать во встроенных колонках, будет почти одинаково. Но на мониторах или в нормальных наушниках, ребят ну серьезно))) сам не любитель нордов, но тут уж явное преимущество.
I see...
#1 Casio
#2 Nord
Nord sound is slightly different (it's better). It sounds deeper and with more presence on mid keys, getting much closer to a real acoustic piano. Still, Casio sound is also really good and I would certainly buy one for my setup.
+Jônatas Silva casio by a mile....your ears are off......
1- Casio 2-Nord That is indisputable. However , the price difference perhaps is a weak point for Casio
1 is by far richer, fuller, more realistic. It's the Casio.
Wow. I was pretty sure that the 1st one must be the nordd, since it sounds so rich and powerful, and I've almost considered not getting the Casio PX5S. The second one (nord) is so plastic and unnatural compared to the first (Casio), that it's not even funny.
2 sounds better to me in most cases
SE NÃO PAGAR CARO AS PESSOAS NÃO DÃO VALOR!
Marcelo Shop falou tudo! As pessoas se preocupam muito com marca.
o que tu tá dizendo até seria verdade, caso todomundo que viu o vídeo não tivesse certeza de qual é qual, baseando-se só na qualidade do som... rsrs
1st piano was mostly superior in resonance and tone in almost every respect.
Antes de terminar o vídeo coloco aqui minha impressão: Gostei mais do primeiro piano, o segundo é mais abafado, grave...Vamos ver o resultado
Exatamente o que escrevi no meu comentário. tomara q o 1 seja o privia, pois sou fã da marca.
This one was soooooo easy, clearly the first one is the Casio.
the winner is casio number 1, nord number 2. period.
In my opinion CASIO
Меня приколол Nord... Если это номер 2) Хотя у самого Yamaha Motif XS , Korg KronosX и Kurzweil PC88X. Но Nord прикурил бы ради плотного рояля, пробивного)
Пиано №2 более натурально. Оно "честнее", богаче нюансами, и звучит явно "дороже". В то же время, №1, вероятно, будет выигрышно звучать в миксе, в ансамбле. В общем, моя версия: №1 - Casio
No fim das contas a equalização do nord parece ter ganhos nos médios o que deixa o som mais ardido. Pra quem não gosta de som assim, vai preferir o Casio.
os timbres do px5s nao são tao bons, ja tive
@@babajckeys também já tive o Casio e gostei. Se bom ou não é relativo.
Eu
OK, I found where you told which is which! I noticed that, with the Casio, your softest notes were louder that the Nord, most of the time. Is that your playing, the keybed action, or a limitation of the Casio? (Thanks so much for your comparison!!!)
I kept the 3k and bought the casio... I noticed the same thing on my first play. Dug into menus and found different velocity settings that helped. I suspect that the nord keybed is better, but the casio is better than my old Yamaha p-200. 24lbs carrying weight... well.. My K2600 weighs 56lbs... 87 in its ata road case.
El primero es el Casio PX 5S, el segundo es un piano Nord que mi PX5S reproduce fielmente desde su motor, no es por sampleo...pero los tres sensores y el sistema de resonancia como así el de frecuencia de este Casio es superior al poderoso motor del Nord, es decir este Casio usa las mismas tomas del Steinway que el kursweil forte, pero sus sensores táctiles son superiores, tanto así a las teclas "Fatar" de Nord y el K Forte que ahí es por donde pierden. Después por lo demás en funciones es superior el Nord pero en lo que respecta a piano y pianos electrónicos
pensándolo en bruto es superior el Casio.
tienes la razón,tengo casio px5 y fue una gran elección,y me ahorre algunos millones
lo que el casio tiene de mejor que el nord es el precio nada más
@@a__-yg7vz ponele, si no lo conoces en profundidad, después en lo tecnológico no te lo discuto y el nord es hermoso pero en sonido Salvo los Hammond, después no hay diferencia...y está más que demostrado amigo...80000$ contra 250000$. Por supuesto que el Nord es considerado una marca profesional al lado del Casio pero aún así ya demostró estar a su altura más allá de la marca.
@@a__-yg7vz sería algo así como comparar David contra Goliad...y es a lo que apunta el vídeo. Y que no hace falta gastar una fortuna para tener un sonido de nivel profesional.
@@AlmaSofi2704 yo tuve los 2 pianos, y puedo decir que nunca estuve satisfecho con el sonido que tenia el casio. en las presentaciones en línea, stereo, sacandole lo mejor que podia... se oye considerablemente artificial, siempre sentía eso (tuve un tiempo un korg, y me paso la misma impresion). pero no tengo defectos que apuntar al nord stage, de verdad. la calidad del sonido es superior. el Wurlitizer de nord es hermoso, igual los electric piano. los de casio no me suenan a su altura de ninguna manera
Y asi es con precios. cuando llegas a una determinada calidad de productos, el "poquito mejor" (si asi lo ves) sale mucho más caro. si no quieres invertir eso, es tu decision, pero creo que no ganes mucho en hacerte creer que no hay mucha diferencia. de mi perspectiva, valió la pena dejar el casio
The nord is the number 1, by default it does not use reverb!
+D Mb Casio has default reverb, nord is does not, it's true. But was added a little reverb to nord for a paritet
#1 is the Casio.... i can't miss that sound...coz I have the same....
Casio is best and more natural
Voting for the second one (2nd)
#1 sounds fake imho. #2 is much better, still not lifelike
You sound like an asshole.
I'd say they're both similar, though Casio is much cheaper.
casio is better and warmer
hello i m think the nord piano is a number 2
I'm playing on a toy with batteries . wich woman didnt try this ? Oke...... I have a Hammond toonwiel with 960 leslie , expensive big and heavy....my Roland Prelude, cheap little and light ,it has very good Hammond sounds and even for records I use it more then my Hammond . For using a grand piano I had to buy one , so going to the shop and took 1 hour for it. Even my favo Yamaha couldnt convince me and tatataaaaaaa...the Nord , yes...o happy days. Pling pling pling ehhhhh..pling pling. Hmmmmm ...back to Casio ( thats the brand name of watches yet ? )...pling jazz pling classic. Sir , whats the price ? 733euro ? 800dollar. Things chances and more and more product looking and sounding the same , even in cars ( Kia ) .
Однозначно 1- Касио, 2 - Норд.
2 is better.
O Privia veio para baixar o ego dos outros.
#1, the second it’s a little mellow! I don’t like it.
Мне кажется что Nord выступает под номером 2. Если это не так, я буду приятно удивлён Casio.
номер 2 однозначно приятнее звучит
1й фрагмент:1-Casio,2-Nord. 2й фрагмент:1-Nord,2-Casio. Дальше не знаю..
тамм все время под №1 одна модель, а под №2 другая)
Yuriy Klavishko ну тогда 1-Casio.2-Nord
2. Casio 100% т.к. у касио ужасно короткие семплы что делает игру классики невозможным. Такая же беда и на новой модели S100. А вот 1. Это Nord - ломучие не надежные инструменты маленькой компании как и Kurzweil
Piano 1
1 - норд, 2- касио...
Where the hell is the actual answer? Thumbs down...
nao tem o que discutir...a presença q esse piano do nord tem e sem palavras...
No
nord wins!!
nr 2 sounds better.
nord ❤
2!!!
1 = Nord, 2 = Casio. The Nord sounds better.
ANSWER - ionika.com.ua/ru/page/px5svsnordstage2
Ha! You had them backwards! You thought the Casio sounded better!
: )) Casio 1, Nord 2
ypstudio makes me glad I bought a new px 5s a few weeks ago without shopping. I heard it and the price at 899.00 was in my range. I totally love the distorted organ sound on this thing as well.
what???? i knew in an instant no. 1 was casio - i have a casio at home it has such a distinctive sound you'd hae to be deaf not to hear it. Speaking of sound quality, nord sounds way better, but it's up to everyone's taste, of course.
1 = casio , 2 = Nord
Casio sounds like beginner's keyboards. Even the most expensive casio pianos is far far way from a real piano.
Nord 2 is better, but still digital sound.
For me, Today Nord Piano 3 have the most realistic sound between all digital pianos on the market.
After Nord Piano 3, Rolad RD700 is the best.
My opinion!
Yawn, another 'comparison' review where no identification is made. This was a waste of my time.
+tkarlmann Before waste your time u could see the word "BLIND" in titles.
Call the 'review' whatever you want. It is all written for the reviewer to sit back and chuckle, knowing s/he's the "only one who knows" -- this whole review is just a load of garbage!!!!!
+tkarlmann You can look another youtube video with PX-5s or Nord Stage 2. And compare their sounds. Because on this video Nord is Nord, and Casio is Casio. :) I have a nord, and i played casio px-5s, and this is like that. If you don't believe me, you can search all youtube BLIND sound tests and write comments like "fake, garbage, you waste my time" :)
+tkarlmann Sir if you think its garbage than maybe you'll answer this; Did either sound like garbage?
+tkarlmann Sorry, guys! I'm the sort that likes to know the instrument, then judge the review. I'm beginning to appreciate your "blind" idea. The very fact that you would compare these two speaks well of the Casio.
nenhum teclado Barra o nord nos pianos. principalmente essas pragas da casio
Marcos Rudess com certeza o nord ainda e infinitamente superior...casio nao e concorrente p ele,o publico alvo dela e mais pra quem esta iniciando.
Pois é... o Roupa Nova e todos os grandes que se apresentaram no Rock in Rio estão iniciando... babaquice, cretinice e mania de grandeza.
O Casio é uma praga mesmo , devia ser direito no Brasil de podermos metermos fogo nessa porcaria onde encontrarmos um Casio e não importa de quem fosse , mas infelizmente uma coisa boa dessa nunca acontecerá por aqui 😒
Micael Postiglione kkkkkkkkk melhor comentário
A Casio mostrou o que sabe e deixou até os amante das marcas caras com raiva e inveja. Privia neles