Siskel & Ebert Review Sorcerer (1977) William Friedkin

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 334

  • @muaykaliente4386
    @muaykaliente4386 11 місяців тому +55

    A criminally underrated masterpiece.

    • @Batou3
      @Batou3 10 місяців тому +2

      In fairness going up against Saturday Night Fever, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and not to mention Star Wars…..an uphill battle on F-ing K2.

    • @magicapricot
      @magicapricot 4 місяці тому +3

      When people say this they’re usually exaggerating but it’s actually perfectly apt in this case

  • @goosebumpsemiliano9104
    @goosebumpsemiliano9104 3 роки тому +253

    This movie has the music of a sci-fi, a feel of a horror movie, the risks of a adventure movie and the fate of a masterpiece

    • @edwardwright2989
      @edwardwright2989 2 роки тому +10

      It's a good underrated film. Don't over do it.

    • @JulithaRyan
      @JulithaRyan 2 роки тому +5

      beautifully said maestro! I truly love Sorcerer ❤

    • @MrOctober44
      @MrOctober44 Рік тому +2

      ​@@edwardwright2989 Lol. I think people tend to do that for a few reasons. It was the beginning of Freidkin's commercial decline. He's also been somewhat forgotten over the years. Had this movie had anywhere near the success of the Exorcist or the French connection this probably wouldn't have happened. A lot of his films have been underated since then. Definitely a good underated movie, but masterpiece? That's a stretch. I don't think there's a great performance by anyone

    • @juniorjames7076
      @juniorjames7076 Рік тому +6

      Didn't this movie come out the same week as Star Wars or Jaws? If so, it never had a chance.

    • @chrsn
      @chrsn Рік тому +1

      Also, Sorcerer actually has a much better ending than the original Wages of Fear (which was so bad that I thought it ruined the film).

  • @ommm8
    @ommm8 Рік тому +32

    Amazing film; the bridge sequence is one of the greatest set-pieces in cinema history, absolutely breathtaking.

  • @sksksksl
    @sksksksl Рік тому +80

    I saw this movie in the theater when it first came out and thought it was absolutely stunning. Paid to watch it many more times before it left the theaters and got it on VHS and DVD ASAP. Amazing, underrated film. Holds up all these years later.

    • @juniorjames7076
      @juniorjames7076 Рік тому +7

      I discovered this film being shown one Friday night in the basement auditorium lecture hall of my college in the mid '90s. I honestly just stepped in to kill time before going to a keg party, but I ditched the party and sat mesmerized and stunned by the story I was watching. I started going to more offbeat "arthouse" films after this.

    • @Dimythios
      @Dimythios Рік тому +3

      I saw this in the movies and man it was a pretty good movie.

    • @light9999
      @light9999 Рік тому +2

      Sounds like you helped it make most of its box office. I caught this in the 80s on that new thing, pay cable movie channels. Got HBO and Showtime and spent hours watching movies I'd never seen or heard of, they actually had rather sophisticated adult programming in those early years. I was young, my tastes were mature, I was happy. When this one came on I sat in mesmerized silence for its entirety and then always remembered it as a shockingly good and affecting film, that no one except film studies people know about.

    • @bartsullivan4866
      @bartsullivan4866 Рік тому

      similar to Blow out a few years later you watch the film just 1 time and are mesmerized

  • @westerndoughty2315
    @westerndoughty2315 Рік тому +32

    This is my fav Friedkin movie. Incredible I wish Criterion would release it

    • @Cakodode
      @Cakodode 9 місяців тому +4

      wish granted

  • @karinacontreras8462
    @karinacontreras8462 Рік тому +19

    I was sooo lucky to watch this film with William Friedkin in attendance at the TCM film festival!!!! Incredible

  • @objetocine
    @objetocine Рік тому +103

    Now that Friedkin is gone, this is the one that you must watch to find the kind of amazing filmmaker he was.

    • @robertforster8984
      @robertforster8984 Рік тому +2

      What? William Friedkin is still alive.

    • @davidmcmaster2083
      @davidmcmaster2083 Рік тому +7

      He's right there with Coppola, 3 sensational, classic 70s flicks for Bill, 4 for Coppola. Just saw an interview with him where he was talking about how it sucks getting old. He had a hard time even standing this year. He came up with 2 great ones the last few years, Bug, which is hilarious, and Killer Joe. Siskel complains about the characters being unlikeable. That's one of the things I dig about it, the cynical characters. In Killer Joe, every friggin character is an asshole. He will be missed.

    • @IvánGonzález_gdlf
      @IvánGonzález_gdlf Рік тому +3

      @@robertforster8984 no,he died a week ago

    • @JacksonHoulihan
      @JacksonHoulihan Рік тому +2

      @@robertforster8984 , He passed on Aug 7, sadly.

    • @nolagospeltracts8264
      @nolagospeltracts8264 Рік тому +1

      @@JacksonHoulihan WHAT? I had no idea.

  • @grizzlywhisker
    @grizzlywhisker 7 місяців тому +12

    This movie is truly one of the most underrated and overlooked films of all time. Even after almost 50 years and people rediscovering what a hidden gem it is, it still remains in obscurity and is very rarely talked about. I would say this was Friedkin's best film, even better than The Exorcist, The French Connection, and To Live and Die in LA.

  • @Barot8
    @Barot8 Рік тому +13

    It's such an underrated masterpiece. The studio had no idea how to market it. I was lucky to see this in the theater when it came out and was amazed. This sequence alone is riveting and suspenseful.

  • @normanmacfarlane6724
    @normanmacfarlane6724 8 місяців тому +7

    Hard to believe this movie disappeared without a trace.
    This is a classic that will be spoken about in years to come .

  • @JollyDeacs11
    @JollyDeacs11 11 місяців тому +2

    A couple of things here... notice the "howling, grunting and subtle frequency tone, along with the wood creaking sound effects. Pure brilliance. I'm not even mentioning Tangerine Dream's Synth compostions that just add such a rich layer of intensity to this classic cinema masterpiece. This is true filming within the highest degree of art form. Bravo... these types of scenes now have CG Graphics and computers taking over...

  • @EbonyPope
    @EbonyPope 15 днів тому +1

    Recently discovered this masterpiece. What a movie. We have to spread the word!

  • @matthewschwartz6607
    @matthewschwartz6607 Рік тому +26

    I always loved Roy Scheider. He was on fire in the 1970’s (All That Jazz, Klute, Jaws, The French Connection. And this sounds good, too.).

  • @joelstein4657
    @joelstein4657 Рік тому +9

    I remember being totally blown away when I saw this film in the theatre. A terribly dark and depressing movie but a tour de force of directing and acting beyond anything I've seen before or since. Thanks for reminding me of a great movie.

  • @BalBurgh
    @BalBurgh Рік тому +2

    I saw this in the theater when it was released and re-watch it regularly. It remains one of my three all-time , co-favorite films. It is just supremely great -- to me. I recognize that it may not be everyone's cup of tea, but it is definitely mine. Finally, I agree with some of what Friedkin, himself, had to say about the film, but disagree with other things. It should absolutely be better known and watched and appreciated.

  • @richwickliffeauthor
    @richwickliffeauthor Рік тому +22

    That scene would be all CGI now. And I'm on the edge of my seat watching on a computer screen

    • @jackbauer4186
      @jackbauer4186 6 місяців тому +1

      Watching the film I kept saying 'how'd they shoot the bridge scene without killing anyone' and kept thinking there's way that a model. But it was. Simply amazing.

  • @PhilAndersonOutside
    @PhilAndersonOutside Рік тому +13

    One of two Friedken masterpieces few people saw, and many have forgotten (To Live and Die in LA is the other).

    • @jamesjohnson-corwin3828
      @jamesjohnson-corwin3828 8 місяців тому +3

      Yes! From Tangerine Dream in Sorcerer to Wang Chung with To Live and Die in LA. Both brilliantly created.

  • @vizzini589
    @vizzini589 7 місяців тому +5

    Amazing Film, and a brilliant soundtrack.

  • @FrankBonessa
    @FrankBonessa 29 днів тому +1

    Still am amazed and get goose bumps over the wobbly bridge scene, even after 30 years since I 1st watched it.

  • @koroba01
    @koroba01 Рік тому +43

    I loved this movie, had one of the best soundtracks, got me turned onto Tangerine Dream.

    • @kmcleod31721
      @kmcleod31721 Рік тому +4

      Same. I bought this soundtrack on 8-Track in a dollar bin a year or so after it came out. At 13 it was my first introduction into synthesizer music. I had no idea what I was getting into.

    • @wildkeith
      @wildkeith Рік тому +4

      Tangerine Dream actually led me to this this film. Funny how things work that way.

    • @bobcastro9386
      @bobcastro9386 Рік тому +3

      Same. I first heard the record album, not knowing anything about the film or Tangerine Dream. I was greatly impressed by both. In fact, I attended a Tangerine Dream concert last night in Atlanta- first time I heard them in person (I know, not the original performers) and they played the "Betrayal" track from the film live and in person!

    • @billkrussick6477
      @billkrussick6477 7 місяців тому

      td had me before this, one of the reasons i watched this film was knowing their music.

  • @nolagospeltracts8264
    @nolagospeltracts8264 Рік тому +10

    I saw this on HBO as a teenager. I was totally mesmerized..

  • @frankbaine3918
    @frankbaine3918 Рік тому +18

    One of the best films of the 70's. Most theater-goers were intellectually out of their depth to appreciate the many subtleties within the film. Quite possibly the most depressing & hopeless film I've ever seen. Absolutely loved it.

    • @johnanthonyp
      @johnanthonyp Рік тому

      Agreed. There is a site on youtbe that breaks down the philosophical components to this movie and I found myself nodding at every point. It probably needs to be seen a number of times to appreciate it. The title suggests the allusion that they were all predestined for that trip to Hell for their past behaviours.

    • @ricardocantoral7672
      @ricardocantoral7672 Рік тому +1

      Yes, it's a very nihilistic film yet it's so engaging, even beautiful.

  • @glenbearh9109
    @glenbearh9109 15 днів тому +1

    Characters are cold? No, no, no! They are fronting their feelings. Roy dancing with that woman knowing his life is being held by a thread was moving in it's warmth. Yes he know he did not have a long life ahead one way or another yet still maintained his soul

  • @CraigStellmacher
    @CraigStellmacher 4 роки тому +71

    And a nod to Tangerine Dream for the amazing soundtrack which isn't mentioned here or exhibited in this clip. It's hypnotic on its own.

    • @JasonBagherian
      @JasonBagherian  4 роки тому +9

      Tangerine Dream are awesome.

    • @JulithaRyan
      @JulithaRyan 2 роки тому +3

      So brilliant! I saw them in Melbourne about 10 years ago purely on the strength of this soundtrack!

    • @BillOweninOttawa
      @BillOweninOttawa 2 роки тому +2

      A nod? The music MADE the movie.

    • @ConatyP
      @ConatyP Рік тому +1

      Keith Jarrets inclusion in the soundtrack is the secret sauce

    • @milesobrien2694
      @milesobrien2694 Рік тому +4

      Some of the more famous soundtracks have been Sorcerer, Thief, Legend, Risky Business, The Keep, Firestarter, Flashpoint, Heartbreakers, Shy People and Near Dark. TG composed soundtracks for more than 20 movies.
      There was no mention of why the movie was not released on video tape for more than 25 years. After a lengthy lawsuit filed against Universal Studios and Paramount, Friedkin supervised a digital restoration of Sorcerer, with the new print premiering at the 70th Venice International Film Festival on August 29, 2013 and Warner released a Blu-ray version in 2014.
      I saw this movie in Canada during its original run. I was already a fan of Tangerine Dream. When I rewatch Sorcerer nowadays, I usually watch La Salaire de la Peur (The Wages of Sin) first, then Sorcerer. Both are amazing films in their own right.

  • @rmooreg
    @rmooreg Рік тому +58

    This probably would have done better if it had retained the title of it's source material. "The Wages of Fear" was a taut, adventure thriller, a little known novel that was adapted into a little known, but well made movie in the 1950's. While not a huge hit, the film was so suspenseful and compelling that over time it began to build a following, making it onto many critic's top ten lists. I think that in 1970's there were still many film enthusiasts who would have recognized the title and there would have been a lot more interest generated via word of mouth.

    • @hetmanjz
      @hetmanjz Рік тому +8

      "Wages of Fear" is pretty well-known, though, among people familiar with French cinema.

    • @philiphatfield5666
      @philiphatfield5666 Рік тому +4

      You are so correct. The title and the ad campaign made it seem like it was a supernatural thriller! I kept waiting for demons to show up. Gene was spot on

    • @bertroost1675
      @bertroost1675 Рік тому +4

      @@hetmanjz More people (mainly Americans) need to know classic French films. They were so much better at showing real human nature. Hollywood almost always made things a little too sappy.

    • @wellesradio
      @wellesradio Рік тому +5

      Wages of Fear sounds too much like a crime thriller. But, yes, *Sorcerer* was a lousy title.

    • @fredloeper8579
      @fredloeper8579 Рік тому

      Spot on the title, but little else. @@philiphatfield5666

  • @tsonfire1
    @tsonfire1 Рік тому +4

    Saw this film when it first came out in theaters. Was a great movie, vastly underrated. One of the first films I recall using hand held cameras in some action scenes to give the impression of a news reel footage. Some very tense sequences in this film. The only draw back to this film I found, was the beginning sequences introducing the main characters didn’t really flow well with the rest of the movie. It almost seemed like two separate films stuck together. It is still a very good action drama.

  • @PWS859
    @PWS859 2 місяці тому

    I'm always shocked to hear any film lover could dislike this film. It is bleak, I'll give them that but it's such a spectacle. A true masterpiece. Roy Scheider is my personal favorite/greatest actor of the 70s.

  • @fritzburbank935
    @fritzburbank935 2 роки тому +7

    Watched it for the first time tonite.
    It was great!

  • @Lurvy1963
    @Lurvy1963 Рік тому +19

    With the title Sorceror in front of a demonic statue at the movie's opening, it had the viewers thinking it would be another exorcist/devil movie. It should have been called something else to avoid the confusion. Turned out it was the name of one of the trucks these criminals from all parts of the world were driving through the South American jungles. The music soundtrack and atmosphere did have the images of a horror movie as one viewer said. I watched it a few times on video/UA-cam. Director William Friedkin loves having characters that are troubled/screwed up with their lives in his films (The Exorcist, To Live And Die In LA). One of the most underrated action films from the 1970s. It felt like Friedkin's Apocalypse Now I witnessed.

    • @ryanarchuleta6231
      @ryanarchuleta6231 Рік тому +2

      I kind of like that it's the name of one of the trucks. Like they could've gone the obvious route and named it something having to do with some dangerous truck journey, but something is very thought provoking of this whole story about why it's called Sorcerer.

  • @justanothersciencenerd6907
    @justanothersciencenerd6907 2 місяці тому +1

    I remember seeing the ads for this in 1977, but I was 12 years old and quickly got hooked on Star Wars, like most of the world who ignored this film. Flash forward decades to the film's rediscovery and garnering praise that it didn't get when it came out. I wondered how much of this was hype, until I watched the film and found out it really is as good as is claimed. Most films are lucky to have one sequence as good as the rope bridge, the fallen tree episode, or the oil fire...incredible spectacles and not the only thrilling sequences in the film. I have the Blu-ray, which will go on my shelf alongside my copy of The Wages of Fear.

  • @patkelley8293
    @patkelley8293 Рік тому +3

    I loved the sound track to this movie!

  • @SLAYERSWINE1
    @SLAYERSWINE1 Рік тому +12

    One of Quentin Tarantino's favorite films. I saw this with my father in 1977 when I was 12 at the theater. Seen it a few times since & it always captivates my attention.

  • @bbb8182
    @bbb8182 Рік тому +2

    Saw it in theater and I was spellbound and in fear most of the movie. I walked out feeling spent.

  • @romaneberle
    @romaneberle Рік тому +5

    "the sorcerer" would hugely benefit from a 4k restoration. imagine all that stuff in full detail.

  • @johncollins6415
    @johncollins6415 Рік тому +4

    One of my favorite films. Not for everyone, but every one in it is great, and nihilism 70’s style at its best

  • @antonboludo8886
    @antonboludo8886 11 місяців тому +2

    I saw it in the theatre when it came out.
    Very scary.

  • @alankenyon9035
    @alankenyon9035 3 роки тому +22

    I agree with them about the name. I'd actually never heard of this film till earlier today after reading it in another videos comments. My first thought was, "wow I never knew Roy Scheider did a fantasy film. I need to look this up."

  • @davidmccurtain6443
    @davidmccurtain6443 7 місяців тому +3

    It should have won an academy award for the bridge scene alone.

    • @davidmccurtain6443
      @davidmccurtain6443 7 місяців тому +1

      @JACK-DETH I have the movie poster from the bridge scene framed on my wall .lol

  • @djd620
    @djd620 Рік тому +15

    Would love to see this go to 4K and projected in a theater with Dolby Surround sound.

    • @ajmmoviestv1669
      @ajmmoviestv1669 Рік тому +1

      Yes! Remastered.

    • @Vlad65WFPReviews
      @Vlad65WFPReviews Рік тому +2

      I saw it in blu-ray in a proper theatre and it was amazing

    • @ajmmoviestv1669
      @ajmmoviestv1669 Рік тому

      @@Vlad65WFPReviews I am Jealous!

    • @Vlad65WFPReviews
      @Vlad65WFPReviews Рік тому

      @@ajmmoviestv1669 Yes - then I bought the blu-ray. These days, with streaming services censoring things, original cut dvds are more important than ever.

    • @djd620
      @djd620 Рік тому

      Is it available to buy on 4K? I have the blu ray but it's not 4K.
      @@ajmmoviestv1669

  • @johnanthonyp
    @johnanthonyp Рік тому +24

    The characters are going to be cold though. To varying degrees, they're all psychopaths. And yet, paradoxically, I found myself rooting for them on a human level. They're pitted against nature at its worst. What can go wrong does go wrong at every turn. Gripping.

    • @artlover1477
      @artlover1477 Рік тому +3

      Hmm, all psychopaths? They were all definitely criminals. Scanlon and Manzon were sociopaths. Perhaps Nilo and Kassem could possibly be in the extreme personality category.

    • @gaypirate
      @gaypirate 4 місяці тому

      Yes, definitely cold- these are all amoral, radical, deeply-traumatized, anti-social people... all big reasons for why they're interesting and compelling characters!! There have been thousands of films made about 'heroism' and 'honor' and 'virtue', and they unilaterally seem propagandic in comparison to a film like Sorcerer.

  • @jackspickphone6656
    @jackspickphone6656 6 місяців тому +1

    I was 10 or 11 when this was on Star Channel (later became the movie channel)...I was riveted to the screen

  • @Malvenu418
    @Malvenu418 Рік тому +4

    Would never have known about this movie without your video. King to you, mon frere!

  • @TheYurisam
    @TheYurisam Рік тому +2

    Great find!!! I saw this when it premiered in the theaters.

  • @kayp8385
    @kayp8385 Рік тому +6

    One of the best movies I've ever scene ong

  • @GodLovesComics
    @GodLovesComics Рік тому +4

    Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary have mentioned this movie as one of their mutual favorites on the Video Archives podcast.

  • @thebossman60
    @thebossman60 Рік тому +3

    I saw this in the 70s and LOVED it.

  • @DoctorAustin
    @DoctorAustin Рік тому +3

    The soundtrack was spectacular.

  • @chillbobaggins4632
    @chillbobaggins4632 Рік тому +4

    “Sort of a tricky situation.” 😂

  • @stormbringercoming8105
    @stormbringercoming8105 24 дні тому +1

    The reason the movie got dumped was because the studio system was fed up with the director’s like Friedkin, Coppola and Bogdonavich. They had free rein five years earlier, but blockbusters like Jaws and Star Wars were the future. The age of the “director” was coming to an end.

  • @angelthman1659
    @angelthman1659 4 місяці тому +1

    "Where's the devil?" Classic Siskel line 😂😂😂

  • @alanab9674
    @alanab9674 2 роки тому +28

    I love the title. Went to see it bc Roy Schieder was in it. Understand title drawbacks, as explained by Siskel. Still think it should have become a cult classic.

  • @williamprice3929
    @williamprice3929 Рік тому +4

    I love this movie and the sound track.

  • @pluckyduck11y
    @pluckyduck11y Рік тому +7

    Unforgettable movie. I can see why the title might have misled prospective moviegoers, with little advertising for the subject matter. Although the title is probably taken, I can't think of a better movie to call "White Knuckled"

  • @nickberardo9243
    @nickberardo9243 Рік тому +2

    Director William Friedkin, this film is tough, gritty. Friedkin knew what to do. He once said 'I know how to give audiences 1 and half hours packed with a real thrill'. He certainly achieved this in The French Connection, Exorcist. Using Francisco Rabal whom he wanted in The French Connection to play 'Charnier' made this film great. It just came in the time of Star Wars. I strongly believe this film was an epic. even though it wasn't best at the box office.

  • @John_Locke_108
    @John_Locke_108 Рік тому +4

    Absolutely incredible film.

  • @BARROOMNETWORK
    @BARROOMNETWORK Рік тому +2

    Nice editing, Mr. Bagherian

  • @weirdshibainu
    @weirdshibainu Рік тому +4

    Fantastic movie. The title does hold it back. I would have named it "The Road to Purgatory"

  • @BeCoShooter
    @BeCoShooter 11 місяців тому +1

    An all time favorite. Saw it at a Drive-In when first released. Music by Tangerine Dream.

  • @thevoid99
    @thevoid99 Рік тому +7

    i saw the film nearly a decade ago and... man... what a film. a rare remake that is an equal to its original film.

  • @matthewseanmclachlan
    @matthewseanmclachlan 9 місяців тому +3

    I've seen explosions, death defying action sequences, documentary style film making... nothing like this
    The version I saw had *no sub titles* for the first 15 min (is that how it was in theaters?) and I immediately was hooked.
    My only problem was the ending. But I concede that 1 minute of directorial choice to someone who just gave me 2 hours of film making perfection.
    In short: incredible

  • @hamburgareable
    @hamburgareable 3 роки тому +16

    Powerful movie indeed.

  • @SAMTHINKS2
    @SAMTHINKS2 7 місяців тому +1

    I saw it when it came out. Sometimes you need movie stars instead of great actors.

  • @williamlouie569
    @williamlouie569 Рік тому +2

    I wouldn't drive across that bridge even on nice sunny day. It's a death trap!

  • @bartsullivan4866
    @bartsullivan4866 Рік тому +6

    Another instance of where I completely agree with Ebert and have no idea what the hell Siskel is bitching about. The film didn't have a happy ending and I think it was hurt by that. But the characters all seemed desperate and real. That river scene is so compelling since they had such a hard time getting the scene done period. This is the kind of film they should be showing in film school not this girl boss bullshit superhero films they keep pumping out. The idea that your death could be any moment one wrong move and Ka-boom. I think the marketing and title did hurt the film because Sorcerer makes it sound like a fantasy film which it wasn't Wages of Fear sounds much better. Just the idea of 1 truck making it across that bridge and knowing that the other team and truck have to do the same thing just nuts. I always thought of the most dangerous road on the planet in Argentina while watching this movie. Thanks Jason for posting the video.

  • @TheRealNormanBates
    @TheRealNormanBates Рік тому +2

    3:56 about the title of *Sorcerer.* I agree to an extent with Gene, but if you watch the film and pay attention, the title does make sense. At first, it is simply the name of the red truck with the "yellow teeth". Roy Schieder's truck has "Lazaro" on the hood (like Lazarus), and the red truck has "Sorcerer" titled right below the driver seat on the side of the truck.. you can see the name when the red truck is maneuvering around the 90 degree left turn on the rickety wooden bridge early in their journey.
    But... there is more than that. At the 41 minute mark, there is a quick shot on the very front of the Sorcerer truck showing a cameo of Pazuzu (or at least a demon scribbled in chalk). I thought at first it was just a nice little nod from Friedkin, until I saw the *Wages of Fear* edit and Roy Schieder uses chalk to write "218" above his speedometer after setting it to "0" so he knows how many miles to the Oil Field. The Frenchman (Serrano) comes up to Roy and says "Good luck, Dominguez (Roy's alias)". Roy says "Go to hell, Serrano" and tosses him the chalk.
    It recently occured to me that Dominguez (Roy) unwittingly casted a spell on Serrano and the Middle Eastern guy, essentially cursing them.. they were doomed from the beginning. Most black magic promises wealth and power at the expense of your soul... the assassin dies because he broke his oath, as in the *Wages of Fear* edit he tells Dominguez he flipped a coin as to who he would kill.. he got Dominguez, but decided to kill the other guy because "he is partial to Americans". Everyone dies, Dominguez gets all the money but his soul is cursed to have the shadow of what happened follow him for the rest of his life.
    The title of the movie doesn't refer to the truck... it refers to Roy Schieder's character.

  • @jameskelly5672
    @jameskelly5672 7 місяців тому +1

    Incredible film

  • @sabrinaangeloni9216
    @sabrinaangeloni9216 3 роки тому +6

    Great movie Roy Shieder was great suspenseful. Wish I could see it again.

    • @jameslacey5474
      @jameslacey5474 2 роки тому +4

      It's out on Blu-Ray. I own a copy and love the movie. I actually saw it when it came out originally, I even bought the soundtrack I enjoyed that as well. I'm happy to see it's finally getting it's due credit.

  • @umarkedreturn8776
    @umarkedreturn8776 11 місяців тому +2

    Ebert got it. This was a masterpiece of suspense and had me on the edge of my seat. I have the dvd and watch it here on the tube regularly about once a month at least. Siskel couldn't understand a great movie if it fell on him. Sure the title is a bit misleading, but watch the movie for what it is and you will understand. The scene near the end when he is carrying the nitro and just BARELY able to keep from falling!
    Roy Schieder was one of those actors that could pull off a scene without saying a word.
    Just look at those eyes when he looks at the old woman at the end he wants to dance with. And before that when he gets the check and stares off into the camera. Then there is the part in the beginning where Schieder says "Where am I going?" and the guy says "I swear to Christ I don't know." Then shows up at the end with that tall guy with the bad haircut. Epic picture!!!

  • @glashoppah
    @glashoppah Рік тому +2

    An intense and very under-appreciated movie.

  • @LoafRock
    @LoafRock Рік тому +2

    Loved this film. Your edits rock 🍻

  • @JustWasted3HoursHere
    @JustWasted3HoursHere Рік тому +1

    Almost twice the budget of Star Wars that came out the same year? Wow.

  • @rosario508
    @rosario508 4 місяці тому +1

    I just saw this in a theater tonight. Yes it had it’s flaws but it was one of the most exciting breathtaking experiences I’ve ever had seeing a film

  • @soldat2501
    @soldat2501 Рік тому +1

    Before there was Anheuser Busch's management of their core brand Bud Light, there was Paramount and Universal's release of this movie.

  • @davisphillips993
    @davisphillips993 2 роки тому +8

    Another reason it flipped (according to the director and some critics) was because it premiered on the same week as “Star Wars.”

  • @trfesok
    @trfesok 3 роки тому +18

    I saw this in the theater, but we went having no idea what it was. We, of course, thought it would be about an actual sorcerer! As I recall, the movie is rather dark (cinematography and plot!) and it was hard to figure out what was going on. "Star Wars" killed this film. But I'll have to rewatch it again soon at some point.

    • @TTM9691
      @TTM9691 3 роки тому +7

      You know what you do? Watch this incredible movie....and then watch "Star Wars" AS SOON as it's done! It's the most amazing double feature! It's what I did when I first saw it, and it works so amazing. Sorcerer is gut-wrenching suspense and action, dark 1970s action......and then "Star Wars" comes along and it's this fast, breezy, movie that's also an action/adventure....but totally different. You can literally see it as a goodbye to the 70s "realism" American cinema....and what would become the 1980s-present: the blockbuster years, lol. Anyways, try it, you'll like it! An amazing double feature!

  • @noahtavlin
    @noahtavlin 8 місяців тому +1

    Favorite movie of all time

  • @jaygibson5057
    @jaygibson5057 Рік тому +1

    Good movie

  • @jyesucevitz
    @jyesucevitz Рік тому +1

    i was around then and dont remember it. i also assumed it was a different type of movie. it was great camera work. for the first minute I thought they were 100's of feet in the air. they got me.

  • @glenchapman3899
    @glenchapman3899 Рік тому +1

    I saw this film years ago, absolutely blown away by it. Never been able to find it again because I kept searching for "wages of fear" lol

  • @l.salisbury1253
    @l.salisbury1253 2 роки тому +24

    The reason this tanked at the box office was everyone was expecting a horror movie! The title, Friedkin's direction plus Tangerine Dream's sinister music in TV spots was trying to lure fans of The Exorcist and the Omen. (The Tangerine Dream music would not be out-of-place in an early 80s zombie movie by Lucio Fulci...)

    • @richspinaci8293
      @richspinaci8293 Рік тому +10

      I went to see this movie because of Friedkin and Scheider’s involvement, and thought it was great back in 1977, but my own opinion of the failure I think is because everyone was Star Wars crazy at the time, and this movie died a quick death in the theaters

    • @jerrywoods4066
      @jerrywoods4066 Рік тому +3

      It was kinda boring. But it was decent

    • @wellesradio
      @wellesradio Рік тому +2

      @@richspinaci8293Star Wars crazy or no, plenty of other films succeeded.

    • @aaronleverton4221
      @aaronleverton4221 Рік тому +2

      Well, there was their soundtrack to the horror film The Keep.

  • @rynehall9990
    @rynehall9990 3 місяці тому +1

    I saw this in high school at the movies with my girlfriend at the time. Many years later I showed this to my current girlfriend and she was surprised to see Bruno Cremer who she knew from Maigret.

  • @Bohonk212
    @Bohonk212 Місяць тому

    Okay flick. Good to watch once.

  • @gavancorrigan8813
    @gavancorrigan8813 4 роки тому +17

    This is mental. This video went up around the same time I started watching Sorcerer tonight (having recorded it 3 months ago but wanting to see it for the last few years with Mark Kermode always talking about it in his radio show). And I always look up Siskel & Ebert reviews of old movies I watch. Cosmic.

    • @JasonBagherian
      @JasonBagherian  4 роки тому +7

      Like Roger says, ''it's one of the great lost films of the 70's''. Sorcerer is a great film, enjoy.

    • @pyenapple
      @pyenapple 2 роки тому +2

      Coincidences happen all the time.

    • @Blortoblorto
      @Blortoblorto Рік тому +1

      Al Gore Rhythm

  • @jscottupton
    @jscottupton Місяць тому

    This was NOT a "date movie" that you take your best girl to. This movie was for MEN and young men. I saw it when it first came out. I didn't understand why everyone was ignoring it.

  • @daviddavid5880
    @daviddavid5880 Рік тому +1

    Not even a mention of "Wages of Fear"? C'mon, guys.

  • @jimsmith2877
    @jimsmith2877 Рік тому +6

    What killed this wonderful movie was it came out same time as "star wars ". But I saw it. Recommend it to anyone.

  • @LannieLord
    @LannieLord Рік тому +1

    Ooops - Released around the same time as Exorcist 2 and .....STAR WARS !! This movie looks good and I'm sure Quentin Tarantino loves it .

  • @thereliablesource7938
    @thereliablesource7938 2 роки тому +12

    I think Sorcerer is a cool title even though it didn't help it marketing-wise

  • @Windupchronic
    @Windupchronic Рік тому +1

    The reason I didn't watch this movie for a _very long time_ was the title.

  • @jetyler3400
    @jetyler3400 Рік тому +1

    Sorcerer and Heavens Gate....have any two films ever been so f...d over.

  • @TheRealFamespear
    @TheRealFamespear Рік тому +3

    One of my all time favorite films. The biggest mistake Friedkin made that led to poor box office sales was the title. It confused everyone. The original title was much better.

  • @bobechs7234
    @bobechs7234 7 місяців тому +1

    Finest truck movie ever made

  • @XFLexiconMatt
    @XFLexiconMatt Рік тому +3

    This kind of seems like a remaking or take off on the French thriller "The Wages Of Fear" from 1952, interesting.

    • @thewkovacs316
      @thewkovacs316 Рік тому +2

      it was and wages of fear was superior

  • @seansarto
    @seansarto Рік тому +1

    “Wages of Fear” overshadows it…and remains the better film in my opinion

  • @therealisation5500
    @therealisation5500 Рік тому +1

    Up there in my top ten the actors the stories in the build up the scenes in the village what a shite hole still makes me itch

  • @guilitogamer
    @guilitogamer Рік тому +1

    How come I never heard of this movie

  • @jedijones
    @jedijones Рік тому +9

    When William Friedkin was running his own studio label in the 1970s and had the power to greenlight movies as a producer, he rejected George Lucas' pitch for Star Wars. In 1977, Sorcerer came out just weeks after Star Wars, in the midst of the Star Wars phenomenon, and was crushed by it. This is what karma looks like.

    • @acholl980
      @acholl980 Рік тому +3

      If that wasn't bad enough Universal released Smokey and the Bandit a month later and spent more time supporting it than Friendkin's.

    • @jazcole12
      @jazcole12 Рік тому

      ​@@goBadgers1995rightSmokey and the bandit is really pleb-tier shit.

  • @anagram8
    @anagram8 Рік тому +2

    How the heck do you choreograph that scene?

  • @angelosecchi4053
    @angelosecchi4053 Рік тому +1

    Good but underrated movie

  • @joecole1551
    @joecole1551 Рік тому +4

    Simply one of the best films of all time William friedkin outdid himself a true Masterpiece for all generations❤💯👹 also somebody posted a German recut of sorcerer on UA-cam if you're a fan go check it out it's worth your time the working title is wages of fear has some new scenes not in the original Sorcerer . Enjoy !!!🤟👹👍