It may be true but I and 15 million others identify as palestinian because we lived in the land for centuries (in a region called palestine). So what should we identify as then?
@@GideonDavis half of us are probably not even arab (genetically) and other half hasnt seen mecca in 1000 years (figuratively speaking). No where else is our home, period
Kinda funny Palestinians insist to be "natives" to the land yet unironically identify themselves with a term that literally means "invaders". And that word is actually Hebrew too *smh*
The same with Native Americans and Latinos they take the name of the invaders because they were forced to. Making fun of a people for using a name that they were forced to is pretty dumb. Jews are native there but they left because they had to and the Palestinians took the name because they had to are you dumb it’s minorities just fighting minorities because the enemy has made them fight for years it’s sad honestly who gives a fuck about the name just embrace their own brothers their own blood. I’m Latino Native American my people get killed every year but we don’t even have a country of our own but yet here are some idiots killing their own over a name self extermination at its finest.
No one forced them to use the Palestinian moniker, moreover they denounced it at first. They only embraced it as a political tool since the land was called Palestine in the times the Jews were forced out of the land and they use it as means of propaganda for those who don't know history... which is clearly the majority of people. I don't know the history of all NA tribes so I won't pretend to know to how your identity was formed. But there isn't some monolith called minorities, it's a lie created by people that seek power through this consolidation. Do you really think Muslims and LGBT people share the expirience? And just because Muslims are minorities in the West doesn't change the fact they are majority in ME. And let me tell you a secret, the way they treat minorities in there makes the West look like paradise.
What people identify themselves doesn't change the fact of whether they are indigenous. Nigeria's flag, country and area was named by the British. It doesn't change the fact that their was an indigenous population that was colonised.
@@deficrypto1234 how can Arabs be indigenous to the land still associated with Jewish titles like Someria and Judea aka West Bank or Jerusalem, yet another Hebrew word, when Arabs come from Arabia and only got to this land through Caliphate which is Muslim crusade aka Imperialism. They are as native to the land as white or black Americans are to America ...
@@AhmadAltibi You are absolutely a living person that has every right to live and you have every right to call yourself a Palestinian. If you want history of the word Palestine and of the arabic use of this word, it's in the video.
@@عمرالمختار-ث2م The term "Palestine" first appeared in the 5th century BC when the ancient Greek historian Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" between Phoenicia and Egypt in The Histories en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_name_%22Palestine%22#:~:text=The%20term%20%22Palestine%22%20first%20appeared,and%20Egypt%20in%20The%20Histories. dosnt change the fact that we where the original owners of these lands my friend and i can assure you these lands where owned by my grandfathers not some jew i even know there names israel was created by great Britain they where given the choice to choose either palestine or argentina and one more place i dont remember even the torah is rewritten today ,go and read the pentateuch(real books) which are the first 5 hebrew books of moses (jerusalem was never mentioned in them) todays torah is rewritten based on specific individual intrests you can argue about that but in the end u cant argue about taking someones house or land because before 2000 years ago a jew lived in it
E Pearson yes yes the history of the Jews has soon because Zionist killers of the children just like pharaoh did with the Jews so yes history has changed!
i wish more people had a brain and the will to explore the truth and whats actually happening here and in the past. if you would ask the typical brainwashed person who hates israel or defends terrorism or thinks the arabs are the victims what is palestine he'd prob be like "uhh it was a palestinian state that was stolen by the jews 70 years ago" omegalul
@@iGoogooX okay, I just did verify it ( I didn't really need to as I don't get my history from UA-cam videos I actually read) The term "Palestine" first appeared in the 5th century BC when the ancient Greek historian Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" between Phoenicia and Egypt in The Histories. How are you even disputing this? It's hilarious to me when people correct someone when they're wrong themselves haha stop watching Jooish propoganda
Hi Rudy, yesterday without seeing this after watching one of your other videos, I looked for something concerning the origins of the Palestinians. It's refreshing to hear a channel that defends the truth about Israel rather than blaming it for everything that's wrong in the Middle East. I grew up in Christian churches, and I never went along with the anti-Israel bandwagon and I like to speak for the truth/factual accounts and moral values, so I'm interested in knowing where I can learn about the history and your preferred news and opinion sources concerning Israel and its struggles with other countries. Thank you for this channel.
I hope INDONESIANS can learn from this video. So many hypocrites in my country. I hope their eyes will open and understand that ISRAEL is real. Love you Israel from Indonesian Jew.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
It's also not true. I can't understand why people are thinking that because this man talks with confidence and calm that he is trustworthy, when the words that come out are so obviously bigoted and from a place of disdain.
@@Hail_Sagan @אטילה ורס sorry for interrupt.The word philistine (plistim in Hebrew) had mentioned more than 30 times in Old Testament of Bible. If believe all of u know bible write in Hebrew. Then the philistine ancient found actually are Canaanite. The canaanite that being match DNA by archeologist at West Jordan, Beirut and North Israel is same in bronze and iron age. This is reported by National Geography research. Not by religion book claim. So its prove that canaanite that mentioned in bible its true. On 2019 national geographic report that canaanite DNA found in Jews and palestinian that call arab by your people. On the same research they found more than 50% palestinian decent is no from arab but from Lavant, syria, egypt and Jordan. They found palestinian had match DNA with canaanite research by American University Beirut. But suprissing most Jewis DNA match to Canaanite nit Jews. Probably inter-marriage. The most amazing is Jews and palestinian only had around 70% match. More 90% match to Canaanite is Lebanese and lavant. This research and proven DNA reported in National Geography and registered Journal. So i think with ur ideology mean Lebanese and Lavant can come back in future claim their land too there. So learn to share my lovely Israel people. I was still under my research and collecting as much research reference by truly source. I believe Palestinian had truly right on that land.
@@i_hate_this_world I don't just trust someone if they're calm, someone could be shouting aggressively but if what their saying is based in fact (I do my own research to fact-check) then I have no problem with it. This dude is one of the very few people getting it right, y'all being played by bigots of the the past. Many different groups of people have hated jews for one reason or another.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
@@yansideabacoa6257 dope comment but I think you pressed the wrong button while commenting. This has come up as a reply to a comment about israelis and Palestinians smoking weed together haha You should post this again so it hopefully gets likes and seen by more!
Dear cousin. It goes even further than that goes back to Abraham. Everybody in the world is occupied Palestine and the Palestinians since then we are both from the same father Abraham. So we are actually Canaanites. That’s the irony of this whole thing is to very similar people fighting against each other. It has gone on for too long.
Your argument is such a far reach. You keep saying it was called mandate of.. region of.. area of... then say Palestine and just because the word COUNTRY was not used "according to you" does not mean it doesnt exist. You can't justify the creation of Israel with trying to restore an injustice that happened THOUSANDS of years ago. That is way far back, without mentioning all the empire takeovers that happened after that and that included other areas around Palestine such as Lebanon, Syria Iraq, etc... Would you then argue that these countries don't exist because they weren't one society speaking one language?? And what about BEFORE Judea? Before the founding of Judaism? No one lived there? That video as a whole was a ridiculous to justify the legitimacy of Israel who today is an ethostate that treats its non-jew citizens as second class citizens and is willing to give full citizenship to people from anywhere in the world if they have converted to Judaism.
Why can’t you people just get it in your head that the Jews came back to decolonize their own ancestral lands? The Arabs even fought them for it and LOST that’s how the game is played.
I came here expecting to not like your channel. You’re one of the more well spoken and educated young people I’ve seen in a while. So I’m listening and at least learning your side.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Do be aware that what he is saying is bigoted and hateful. He is saying things confidently and calmly, but the words themselves (eg. saying that the word Palestine was given by Jews and was just an insult) feeds an ugly sense of entitlement in anyone with supremacist beliefs. He is portraying his theories as fact when they are very far from them. There are actually facts from well-regarded publications and people that disprove his versions which makes me more inclined to think that this isn't just a misguided take on information, but a deliberately hateful speech.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
The Ottomans did not use the word "Palestine" it is a British invention. In the Ottoman administrative system, those places were called the Saida Eyalet. Quds, Syria, Lebanon were also used as official province names but the Ottomans have never used the word Palestine to name any place on the earth.
@@user-pi4su6je8p The Ottomans did not use the word for centuries, other than history books there was no Palestine at all. We have many petitions in the Ottoman archives that were written by western visitors and travellers who ask permission; even in these petitions in French Italian German or English the petitioners or their ambassadors mention the word Palestine but while translating them into Turkish the Ottomans replace the word with Saida, Quds etc. This shows how they were decided to not use the word Palestine. Probably it was sounding Jewish to their ears. I don't know the exact reason why they avoided this word but obviously, they avoided it.
@@user-pi4su6je8p Dear HF, I just corrected the video I have no hidden agenda. Thank you. The number of Jews was not high because the Ottomans did not give residence permits to them. Otherwise, there were always many Jews who are very willing to migrate to Jerusalem, but the government did not let them do. Nowadays the Turkish government is proud of this policy.
@@user-pi4su6je8p Dear HF why do attack me insistently in such an aggressive manner with a fake user name? Now you did accept that the Ottomans did not allow the Jews to migrate to Israel. But you continue to accuse me of unnecessary things. My comment was that the Ottomans did not use the word Palestine, and it seems that you had already known this fact but you pretended that you don't know it only to attack me. Why can't you just accept the truth? This is your problem, not mine. I don't want to think that you assume that before 1882, it was free to settle in any city of the Ottoman Empire (let alone Jerusalem). So I guess you can't be that ignorant, again, you're after another fraud. However, keeping my wishful thinking still, I want you to know that this is never the case. Ottoman settlement policy did not allow the Jewish population to increase in any city (an exception can be the ones in Greece). And you can be absolutely sure that the Jewish population did not increase in and around Jerusalem only as a result of the Ottoman government's policy. It was a deliberate limitation. This was even true for the Christians. So please stop abusing my time and good intention.
@@user-pi4su6je8p because you did not watch the video. I just corrected a mistake there but you cannot understand it. There is no place name "Palestine" in the Ottoman Empire but in the video, they argue that the Ottomans used it, that is all. Why do you react so aggressively? It is extremely important to know this fact to understand how the British introduced this country name after the first world war. The Arabs were not sovereign before the great war. Besides, if they were sovereign, they would not have given this name to their country.
Jews were chosen people. Still they did crucify prophets and started taking ribah . Yet it belongs to Israelites but it is not exclusively for them. They belongs to Holi land with given conditions. If you don’t follow the conditions you won’t get ever. Please let me know if you want to know the conditions
Palestine as an "Arab" or "Muslim" entity in our hearts and minds is a relatively new concept...Nowhere in the Quran or the authentic Hadith does it mention Palestine or the Arabic word "فلسطين". There is mention of the Levant/Sham region...There is mention of the people of the Levant...There is mention of Al-Quds/Jerusalem and the blessings of the city and the land around Al-Quds. There is mention of the blessings of praying in Al-Quds... But there is no mention of the fake "Palestine". The Romans named it Palestine! Then when the Romans converted to Christianity, it ended up being a western Christian name for the Holy land. When the Muslims ruled it that name was never used! Then when the British controlled it once the Ottoman Empire collapsed they brought that name back. When the Muslims ruled it they didn't call it "Palestine". If you look at old Ottoman Turk maps of the region, there is no mention of "Palestine"... It's a lie! Palestine as an Arab entity grew during World Wars 1&2 along with the growth of the Pan-Arabism ideology...Pan-Arabism was the tree and Palestine was just a small branch... The tree fell and Pan-Arabism died. Yet people are still holding on to that small branch when there are far important matters at hand.
You know nothing. Before Moses left egypt the region where Jerusalem located qas called Canaan. When Israelites recieve mandate from their God it was called promise land for them by God. After 40 years they have rich Canaan and make war with the canaanites. They conquer the north and south of the region. The southern is where the 2 tribes of israel positioned. It's called Judah. And the philistines or Palestinian are settlers where gaza strip now they called sea peoples they are non canaanites who live in the coastal area of canaan. They're not natives to that area. Jewish is the true owner of that land because God commanded them to conquer the canaanites and it is for them israelites not the muslim or any other groups. Understand?
It is the land of Canaan and those who first inhabited it were Canaanites, and my ancestors are Palestinians. The land was never for the children of Israel. They were guests in it. And the earth is inherited by righteous people
One correction here, the Philistine did survive David as a group around the Pentapolis. The displacement of the Philistines didn't occur till the Assyrians, who would do the same to the Israelites/Samaritans and vassalize Judea. Excluding the early Arab invaders, by the time of the Crusades the land was not known as Palestine. It was known as Syrian, just like under the Ottomans. While there were many attempts of create smaller kingdoms within the Ottoman Levant, outside of Syria, the only identifiable group trying to gain an identity during this time were the Maronite Christians where the modern state of Lebanon is from, although the French made it larger, causing a much smaller Maronite population. There was no Palestine, there was no Jordan. There was a Kindgom of Jerusalem. The land of Palestine is is name kept alive by Christians and the west. They called the land Palestine during the crusades, not the Arabs. This is why you have people in the west refer to Judea at the time of Jesus as Palestine at the time of Jesus. They associate a name to the land that was not called that until a 100 years after the death of Jesus. And while the Hebrew definition of Palestine/Philistine is different, but it looks like the Latin Palestine is related to the Greek word pelasgian, so not only was it an insult to Jews, it was a greco-roman claim to the land. They knew the Philistines were ancient Greeks.
Not really. Well maybe just not in this case. A forgiener can't describe thousands upon thousands of rockets that are fired in Israel and what is going on in Israel right know
Or create a time machine and go back in time The problem with neutral person is not having any idea what happened because that is doesn't related to them Example: would you teach about China-Japan history if you know that? How would both nations feel when someone who wasn't born in their culture will represent their history not 100% accurately?
The name "Palestine" was appropriated by the British mandate in 1917, following WWI. But prior to that, during the nearly 400 years of the Ottoman rule, the land was part of "El-Sham", the southern part of Syria province. in the 400 years under the Seljuks who preceded the Ottomans, there was also no mention of "Palestine", in much the same way as there wasn't any mention of "Palestine" under the Crusader kingdom or the Abbasid/Fatimid early muslim empires.
thank you rudy, im a jew from dagestan in russia, i actually did not know this, and im learning much from your videos about jewish peoples history! thank you !
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Do look at many sources and try to make up your own mind. This video has some questionable theories portrayed as facts. Some of what is said is actually contradictory to some well-establish facts. There are a few comments already here with the information. Knowledge is important. And a critical mind is essential to gain knowledge.
Fam you're so gross to lie like that, there's bloody documentation of Armenians in Palestine identifying strictly as Palestinian, all what you said is lies, scholars have identified as strictly Palestinian since the 14th century at least, absolutely disgusting to try to sound non-racist/revisionist. And enough with the Jordan argument, it didn't exist and was known as the empty quarter, most of them, Christian and Muslim, were unsettled Bedouins a few generations ago, and it's a non-argument anyway, like Christopher Hitchens said, if an Americans from a state was exiled from his own he will no back down without a fight despite having 49 other states to go to, they all still have their own identity. Absolutely infuriating video.
My family left Italy from Palestinian as Orthodox Jews 500 years ago and married other Sephardic Jews. Oh, my heart loves Israel.. we eventually became Catholic. But I converted back to Judaism.
@@justchilling704 about 2 years after I converted, I picked up a bug from the hospital unit I was working on ( I’m an RN).. I went into septic shock and now I’m a below the knee and left toes amputee. In the depths of my heart I don’t feel I left Yeshusa, but a Constantinople view of him. I now have returned. I’ve not uncoverted, why? Because, Judaism is truth just lacking Yeshusa Messiah. When he returns and establishes his kingdom..Torah will be taught in truth and the world will heal. Amen let’s pray for that day. Like me I’m a whole person, but lack a part. I’m in pain.. the world is in pain, I’m waiting for my Yeshusa.
That was so good, Rudy. You would make an amazing statesman. It’s Shabbot where I am in a few hours so you’re probably in it right now but want to wish you a belated Shabbat Shalom.
@@etamlak8199 My apologies. Ethnically Jewish and am learning now. My parents tried but didn’t listen I get Shabbos Shalom and Shabbat Shalom confused Again, my apologies and thanks for pointing it out to me or I won’t learn. Peace
@@nicolasfeduccia9573 You most likeky confused it with Shabbes, the yiddish word for it, used by some haredi communities cause they believe they should not speak hebrew outside of prayers... Another rabbit hole... Anyway.
Anton Adelson the truth you don’t even be told the truth as kids like Santa Claus is coming down the chimney on 24th December. The land belongs to the holy peaceful people not Zionist!!!
Joane. K my people are getting killed every day by Zionist you don’t even spare the young children so yes you are the new pharaoh. Do you think there won’t be another Moses that will rise again and free my people from your high walls and water cuts guns and nuks yes there’s one he is coming soon He will stand against your false messiah the anti christ!!!
The fact that you said that Palestine had no national identity prior back when the Ottomans controlled it is so wrong. Mufti Khayr al-Din al-Ramli literally wrote in legal documents back in 1670 saying "our country of Filastin". Palestine was not its own country but an Ottoman military district.
Bruh I see here people that say it's a lie. I'm shocked that in this age, 2021, people turn their back to facts and history. This are facts I learned that in school last year
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
from my opinion the only way to move forward is by having a federal government controlling both states, no borders, no discrimination just one country with two or three states with a whole new name and a new flag.
In my opinion, the only way forward is to have the Jews exert sovereignty in their land and the other groups accept it or leave. That will bring both peace and justice ✌️⚖️🙏
@normalcy kid If you consider "dumbass" a respectful and accepting way of addressing someone, I then respectfully invite you to fuck yourself. Best regards.
Rudy I watched many of your Videos. You are doing such great job. I am really glad there are people Like you out there sharing the Knowlede and being active and bringing change. and I am so tired of all that hate and craziness people project on each other its exhausting. I wish you all the best and lets hope the World will calm down again and people will Make a Step towards each other more again.
80% of modern day Palestinians can trace their DNA back to the Canaanites. The original inhabitants of the land. Either he’s greatly misinformed or he’s deliberately spreading misinformation. The author of the Balfour declaration, Theodore Herzl (Aka the founding father of Israel), had 3 locations in mind when choosing a ‘homeland’ for the Jewish zionists, which were Palestine, East Africa and Argentina. They obviously chose Palestine, and here we are today. They’re displacing the indigenous inhabitants of the land and try to undermine their history. Most Zionist today trace their lineage to the Khazars who were Turkic from the region of modern day Russia.
A lot of Palestinians have Jewish DNA from the force conversions of the Islamic invasion. Arabs come from the Arabian peninsula. Period. If Palestinians are the original inhabitants of the Levant, WHY ARE THERE ONLY JEWISH ARCHEOLOGICAL ARTIFACTS there?
Many Palestinians have Jewish DNA most likely from forced conversions during the Islamic invasion. Palestinians are not Canaanites because Africans and Arabs are two distinct ethnic groups. Why are there Jewish archeological sites everywhere and no “Palestinian”? Duhhhh
Rudy Rochman yes, but even so, it gives in opportunity for people to try to discredit by saying that the Greeks mentioned the philistines. Writers such as Herodotus
@@yakigesher-zion7289 Yes the Philistines, which are also mentioned many times in historical scriptures by the Jews. This population has nothing to do with the Arabs of today that identify as "Palestinian".
Rudy Rochman even then one should still acknowledge that it was mentioned. There are actually a lot of interesting theories of the origin of the name “Palestine” one being that it is the Greek translation of “Israel” as “Palaistis” means “wrestler” as Israel means “wrestled with god”. The Greeks also used the word Palestine to refer to a larger area of Eretz Yisrael
I have been alive long enough to remember (yep, I'm old) when the problem was Arab vs Israeli. Palestinians (people who lived in the area of Palestine, Arabs, Jews, Christians, whoever) came into the fore in the 60's with the failure of Arab armies to defeat Israel. That struck me then as probably a much more successful tactic. In 1977 a PLO spokesman said it publicly - The Palestinian "people" do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means of continuing the struggle against Israel and our Arab unity. I have always wondered why the incredibly wealthy Gulf states or Saudis do not solve the Palestinian problem. They could build them cities in the desert and make them bloom. Makes me think they prefer them being where they are. Only a thought.
"The palestinian problem". That is disgusting. You want to displace people, Just like the romans did to jews. It is amazing how history repeats itself, now with a different people.
chris sim Palestinians are the descendants of Canaanites and Arabs so they are indigenous and native of the Holy Land. The real Arabs and Bnei Yesrael carry the Haplogroup J1 The majority of Arab tribes ( Qahtani and Adnani ) from Yemen, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf region , Levantine, Iraq, Egypt and North Africa carry the Haplogroup J1 About 45% of Cohanim Jews ( descendants of Aharon ) carry the Haplogroup J1 Famous Jewish families ( Ashkenazim and Mizrahim ) carry the Haplogroup J1 Arab Christians in Levantine carry the Haplogroup J1 Majority of Yemenite Jews carry the Haplogroup J1 ( majority of the Yemenite Jews are Arabs from Kholan and Hemyar tribes ) A new study of ancient Canaanites DNA reveals that " Saudi Arabians,Bedouins and Iranian Jews had the highest percentage of ancestry matching that of the Canaanites, followed by Palestinians, Jordanians and Syrians." Majority of them carry the Haplogroup J1 , read the study as follow : www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/05/dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews/ twitter.com/haaretzcom/status/1266237684101476355
Barack Obama Canaanites were not “black” lol. The term Canaanites refers to different groups of people living in the region of Canaan. Israelites (Jews) were Canaanites, as well as Phoenicians (Lebanese people), and a few others.
@@joshua8774 so basically the land is rightfully everyone's by ancestral birthright. And what Israel is doing is wrong and illegal because it's choosing 1 group of people among many to be the rightful owners of that land.
@@nizarshawwa3704 actually the Israelites are the only surviving group. the rest of the group went extinct or merge with other groups. The modern Palestinian are actually descended from the area of Saudi Arabia.
Are you joking me? Palestine is Judea. There is no identity to decide. It's same same different name, they are from Syria. Arabs cant even pronounce P. Do you see the problem here?? Roman empire gave Judea the name Palestine after bar kochba revolt. They emigrated Arabs from Syria mainly to take revenge on the Jews. Saying that they are people is basically say they have the right to claim anything. The entire history shows that the Jewish people always lived here. The Qur'an does not even mention the word Jerusalem once. There is much to say but i just don't see the point.
Scotland also kept the romans away. They were that terrified of us Celts that they built a wall to protect themselves from us Celts from attacking them. So Scotland wasn’t conquered by Rome. Alba gu bràth 🏴
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
@@yansideabacoa6257 you do not understand the languages used here. p-l-s means invader (migrants forcefully arriving uninvited like the Sea Peoples)in Hebrew and related Semitic languages. Falasha is used to describe Ethiopians Immigrants and falash mura. Modern local Arabs say Balestina because they have no 'F'. Hebrew has both p and f.
Rudy, since you appear to be so knowledgeable of the region and truly wants to seek ways of making peace between both the Jews and the Palestinian people of Israel (which I find most refreshing) realizing the corruption of their current leaders , would you be willing to write an Op Ed piece in the NY Times stating your views that will hopefully help combat some of the anti-Israel bias that currently exists both within the NY Times and in all the Ultra left progressive movements today. I believe it is truly heroic what you are trying to accomplish and wish you much hatzlacha and success
Hi Josh, Can you tell me some things that are there in the coverage of the Times which show an anti-Israel bias? Please enlighten me if you have a few moments, because til now I haven't seen it in the current coverage. Thanks.
It's true that there is corruption on _both_ sides of the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians but the problem isn't with the ultra-left progressive movement, it's with the ultra right fascist apartheid policies of the State of Israel. I agree that Rudy seems more knowledgeable than most but then much of that is due to explicit suppression of the truth and efforts to rewrite history by the Israeli government. There really can't be any peace until Israel accepts what they did to the original inhabitants of the area.
There is no Israel anymore only Palestine. Jewish Palestines may exist but the rest are Jews from other countries who have no right over that land anymore
Hi Rudy, this is a nice video portraying a lot of hope for a better and peaceful future :-) That said, I must add an important comment regarding your saying on 5.40min "the United Nations decided to split up the land into 2". Well, the United Nations cannot decide such things Rudy. Both the United Nations General Assembly and - in most cases - the International Court of Justice have advisory powers only. This is very fundamental. Many people think that the UN is some kind of a powerful world government but that is not true at all. It is mainly an administrative organization. You mentioned the year 1948. I assume you meant the UN Palestine partition plan of 1947. Many people tend to think that UN resolutions and plans are binding. This is usually not the case. This also includes the 1947 UN Palestine Partition Plan (resolution 181). It could have been legally binding however the Arabs rejected it. What IS legally binding are international agreements such as, in this case, the Mandate for Palestine (1922) which was signed by all members of the League of Nations including former occupier Turkey and which was later also accepted by the UN.
(I know your comment is from 2 years ago, but hoping you notice this:) Could you please explain a little more? I've been trying to learn about the conflict, but I still have a lot of questions. if the UN couldn't decide on the land, then who gets to decide the borders? and what happens if there are no international agreements? since the borders changed a few times in history (with Egypt and Jordan) then what are the parts that are considered occupied now, and how are those determined?
@@ansamgroshong Hi Ansam, the UN (usually) does not get to decide about land(s) and borders. I wrote usually because they did come out with a partition plan for Palestine in 1947 (resolution 181). Although a plan by itself is judicially non binding in terms of international law, however, if that plan was accepted and signed by both Jews and Arabs then (and only then) it would have become legal under international law and so its borders too. But since the Arabs rejected it then that plan became meaningless. What many people call 'the borders of 1948' were actually not recognized borders rather armistice lines (cease fire lines). After the peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan in the 70s and 90s they became recognized borders. Therefore the (internationally recognized) borders with Egypt and Jordan did not "change a few times in history" as your words suggested. Many countries around the world did not even go through any 'judicial process' and indeed no international agreements! That was not the case with the Palestine region, the Levant (and including today's Iraq). The reason that this region did go through a judicial process lays at the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the end of WW1 (they ruled that whole region). At that point the League of Nations (the organization that preceded the UN) appointed the winning powers, Great Britain and France, to establish mandates in that region. The mandates that were established were the Mandate for Greater Syria (which then included Lebanon), the Mandate for Mesopotamia (Iraq) and the Mandate for Palestine. And the goal was that France and GB would assist the local populations towards establishing their independence asap. The mandates were legally binding under international law, signed by all members of the League of Nations including the defeated country Turkey. I hope this clarifies things a bit?
@@danitadmor thank you. I appreciate your taking the time to explain and write all this. I did have another question. but i just need a day or two to write again (takes me some effort to write - medical problems).
@@danitadmor Hello yes I understand the clarification you made about the UN Re what I wrote, yes I guess I wasn’t accurate. I only meant the control over the land changed, but I didn’t know what changes were considered agreed on borders and which weren’t. I went over your reply more than once and I think you answered everything. (You really explain well. Thank you). I’m from Iraq (though now I live in the US) so I know about the ottomans but I didn’t know the details you wrote. It wasn’t only till some years go when I started to think how we always thought of the western countries as the occupiers and colonizers, but nobody talks about the ottomans. As re Israel- Palestine conflict, I don’t know if you’re aware we have a very very different story on the other side. Earlier this year I came across some videos by an Israeli person (a tour guide) on youtube, and I was surprised how all he said was different from what I had known (or thought had known). I’ve learned more since then, esp after Oct 7. My view has changed completely. I meant to ask about the settlements, but I think maybe I better wait and find some videos. I don't want to make it too much for you. Maybe one question: (if ok): a few have mentioned the Jordan (or Transjordan) too was part of the mandate of Palestine, and say therefore the arabs already had a bigger part. But not all Israeli supporters mention this. Is it a debated issue? Thank you again.
@@ansamgroshong You're welcome Ansam, and no problem for asking the questions! (that's what we're for, not? ;-) Indeed many people have many stories to tell about the Israel-Palestine conflict but what I wrote earlier wasn't a story rather international law: the Mandate for Palestine. You can read the contents of the mandate on the site of the UN (I think I cannot send links here..?) As I mentioned earlier, with the fall of the Ottoman Empire, the winning forces of Great Britain and France got control over the remaining areas of the Middle East that used to belong to the Ottomans. That was Iraq, Greater Syria and Palestine. Political rights under the mandates of Iraq and Greater Syria were given to the Arab populations in those areas whereas in Palestine (which at first Transjordan was indeed included in) were given to the Jews. But 2 years later Great Britain decided to separate Transjordan (which amounts for 74% of Palestine) from 'western Palestine' and give that area to the Hashemites. Jews were no longer allowed to settle in that area. So when the actual Mandate for Palestine was signed in 1922-1923, Transjordan was excluded from it. But, according to the mandate, Jews were (and, as long as no new international agreements are signed/finalized also - are) allowed to settle in all of the remining areas of Palestine west from the Jordan river (and they are even encouraged to do so according to the international community!) - this is all to be found in the mandate. The mandate, except for the fact that the British have returned it back then to the UN and as long as no new international agreements have been signed/finalized, is valid up to this day.
It seems you think the issue is more to do with who came to the land first and should be there. When speaking to Palestinians they're argument isn't that Jewish History didn't exist but that the Palestinians have their own history too. But you speak of them as if they don't have a 2000 year history. I think the main issue is that Zionist want Israel to be a 'Jewish State' but that's not possible with a community of a few million Arabs. If israel were to drop the 'Jewish State' idea and allow full rights to all people, especially voting, then maybe we'll start moving in a good direction. Majority Jewish Israel = Killing and displacing the Palestinian Arabs. That's not okay.
Rudy is one of those who respects Palestinians and their own heritage. In the end of the vid he said there’s no future with no Palestinians and no future without Israelis in this land. So no, he is not one of those extreme Jews that want to kick out people. He is a good guy, I met him in person. I’m half Polish half Arab Palestinian born in Israel.
Democratic Jewish country doesn’t contradict the fact that Arabs can and will live there freely. The issue is that many of them want Sharia law and other stuff. Which is... passé. I lived there and it’s really ok. Much better than life in Jordan or Egypt, not only from economic perspective but organization and caring about infrastructure, technology, job opportunities, freedom of speech, healthcare, education. I just want from Israelis to recognize the fact that Palestinians are a nation with its own flag, anthem and Arabic language. We can make as a federation like Russia did with Chechnya. They had over 10 years of bloodshed, Grozny was a ruin. And now? It’s very prosperous. Same thing can be with Palestine if we agree to a federation. So Israel will be called the Federation of Israel, being a democratic Jewish State. And I put Democratic before Jewish cause I want Israel to be a secular place that respects all of its citizens.
@@SebaX92 This is very beautiful. Thank you for sharing and educating me more on the topic. I have a personal issue where I dearly wish to visit Jerusalem and the holy land but the Israelis will stop me at all costs from doing this. Hopefully one day we can see that land in peace with love and respect for all.
@@MrHRanjha I also hope for that. I live today in Poland. There's a nation inside Poland called Kashubians, they are having they're own language, flag and anthem, living in north west Poland. They're respected and part of the whole country. I do wish same thing can be with the Palestinians, to be respected citizens with all rights and acknowledgement. My family is still in Israel. The issue today is Iran that wants to make chaos - in the middle East as a whole. They're doing it with Turkey btw. Syria and Lebanon are a good example, Iraq is now for Iran just like Belarus to Russia - a puppet state. I'm not hating Iranians but many elderly people are saying that there's a prophecy saying that a mighty army will come from the east to destroy Israel and it'll be in judgement day "Yaum Al Kiyama" . And in that day the sun will rise from the west. In that term we can understand that it's in Saudi Arabia and Jordan perspective - so means that a nuclear blast will be in Israel and will be bright like the sun rise. Which will begin a nuclear war and the end of humanity. The judgment day 😞
@@SebaX92 What you've told me of the Kashubians is very interesting. I wonder if there is any videos about them on UA-cam... It reminds me of a similar case where I come from, Pakistan. Our western most regions in the mountains has groups of people who are their own ethnicity (they look like europeans as they descend from alexanders people), speak their own language and some even have their own religions and cultures. These people have lived remotely in the mountain for thousands of years. The thing is, us Pakistanis don't consider them as Pakistani (they request this). They have a stronger link with the Afghans and would actually like to be part of Afghanistan. But due to the insane political climate in Afghanistan for so long it's been difficult for Pakistan to officially gift the land to the Afgans. So for the moment, that land is considered part of Pakistan as it falls under Pakistani border however they are free to govern themselves as they wish. Pakistan simply gifts them with security and protection. Nothing else. The worst part of it all is that they actually have strong links to the Taliban and are the reason th Western media are able to say Pakistan has terrorist camps. When you look at a map with no knowledge of the land and people then yes Pakistan does. But when you know about the Afghans living independently in the mountains you come to realise all of these camps are in their territory. Territory Pakistan has zero control over. In regards to your theory about Iran and Turkey, I have heard this before. And iv also heard the opposite from the other side. As a Muslim that is not from that region I am able to look at this from an informed outside perspective. It seems there is a bigger problem here from which all of these smaller problems are coming from. There are over 50 Muslim majority countries in the world. The Muslim population is not only huge but extremely strong which is why there have been so many Muslim empires that have ruled big parts of the world. It has been a long time now since a Muslim empire ever existed. The West (Brit, Europe, America etc) split the muslims apart and have not only done a great job of it but are currently maintaning it very well too. If the muslims were to get back together and become one empire with one empire that would be the end of the Unitied Nations, the end of Nato, the end of Russia. The muslims will very quickly take over the world! What I believe is going on here is simply politics. The current rulers of the world are making sure the muslims fight each other so they can't join forces and take over. - What this means is, everybody is bad. All of the bad people have been put in power in order to make sure the muslims keep fighting each other. Turkey, Iran, UAE, Saudi, every single one of the leaders are just as evil as each other behind closed doors. If they werent evil, they simply wouldnt be in power.
why is no one asks if the palestinians are the same people that lived long time ago on this land but converted to other religions and the jew people that came from europe also converted to judaism
It's funny that this is even something that Rudy would address when the history of Jews is arguably just as convoluted as the Palestinian history is being painted in this video - and Rudy eludes to this notion in the video without really providing a balanced summation. Also, modern Isreal didn't exist before 1949, and Jews come from several tribes and many have a significant European heritage. So what is the point of this video?
Jews always had a connection to the Israeli land in their prayers and cultural rituals. It’s our promised land no matter if our enemies want to take it away from us we’ll always return as god promised to our ancient fathers. We’re welcoming the Palestinians to live with us in peace but they want to take away our entire country and we’ll fight till death before we’ll let it happen. Stop fighting the jewish people and god will bless the entire world. Peace for the Middle East inshalla
@@elizabethspring2208 Judea existed over three and a half thousand years ago. This is where the children of Israel (descendants of Jacob) settled after leaving Egypt and took their name, Jews from the land. Palastine as a region, it was never considered a country was named by the Romans two thousand years ago. This was like America losing to Japan in World War 2 and being renamed Hitler land as an insult to be endured every day.
אין לך מושג עד כמה אני מעריך אותך ואת כל מה שאתה עושה. גיליתי את הערוץ שלך היום ואני לא מספיק לראות סרטונים. תמשיך ככה! תודה רבה. סוף סוף יש לנו מישהו עם קול שלא מפחד להגיד את האמת
Israel was under Roman rule until the Ottomans took over (Pompey subjugated Israel at least 100 years before the temple was destroyed)... then the British came and kicked the ottomans out (the ottoman empire dissolved) Britain retained control for approx. 30 years under a mandate from the League of Nations. It was Churchill that split palestine (white paper of 1922) The palestinians were never an independent or separate nation, they merely occupied the ottoman empire territories (a "province" called palestine)
What was the Nakba ? What about the mass migration of European Jews to Palestine ? Again, biased review to negate the fact that Arab people were the majority of people living on the land before the UN (with no right) decided to split the land and start giving it away to European Jews who migrated from Germany and other European countries. Despite all of this, the Jews living in the land that were once called Palestinians, a large amount converted to Muslims. They're were the Jews living in the land 2000 years ago. Also right now who is being oppressed, who are living in the wrong side of the apartheid state created by Israel and who's being forcible removed from them homes. Who's being bombed indiscriminately under the guise of self defense against terrorism. It's very clear what is happening. The human rights violations and war crimes and atrocities being committed with impunity against an impoverished people who cannot defend themselves and have had to turn to a terrorist organization for defense. It has nothing to do with hating Jews or not wanting Jews to have their own state and everything to do with fighting for the rights of an oppressed people being treated Unjustly.
You're not going back far enough in history. This story began thousands of years ago. First off Palestinians are not Arabian, genetically Palestinians and Jews are related to each other through the Canaanites. It is like a giant family feud. The sad part is since the beginning of time all the wars that mankind have fought makes me picture mankind as a bunch of fleas fighting over the dog they live on.
@@rebilium4195 "Silence is gold" ... Worth thinking about when you ask "is there any historical material of those stories"... Are you admitting you dont know the name of any historybooks or encyclopedias? I.e Britannica?
@@ronnylarock13 This is a textbook example of how to NOT communicate in a positive and productive manner. The exact opposite of what Rudy is doing. Be more like him, don't be like that. It's counter productive.
נדמה שהוא ישראלי שגר בארה"ב, הרי יש לו סרטונים אחרים בערוץ בהם הוא משוחח עם אנשים ברחוב לגבי נושאים בקשר ליהודים, פלסטינים, וישראל. עושה עבודת קודש בלייצג אותנו.
What is ? This is all none sense . The problem was never jews against palestinians cuz there are jewish palestinains now a days who r 100 percent against the so called Israeli state.
@@jamilabidrabbu1198 they are not Jewish Palestinians, we call them extreme left jews who are against zionism and themselves in favor of the Palestinians
And by the way Im not of the opinion that Jews should be kicked out of the area but Im against settlers from Europe and United States entering the land. Those immigrants shouldnt be allowed because 2.000 years ago they might have had a jewish (ethnic) grandmother from the area. I think the solution is a common state which respect both peoples and with full equality and opputunity for all. Like Belgium were you have two different ethnic groups in the same country well functioning together. Not a jewish state, not an arab state but a common state. But to be honest I dont think its gonna happen as long as the israeli government have all those religious extremists far right people who only want a jewish state and allows aliyah only for jews and not palestinians because it would cause a "demographic threat"
The only answer is for all Jews to return back to hashem,he is waiting for us to talk to him we don’t even want to spend one hour a day alone talking to him,he’s crying for us to be close to him.... that’s our ONLY ANSWER.....please return back to hashem let’s keep the Torah let’s talk to our father at least an hour a day...... it’s about time... ❤️
@BVEmasTRUTH I never knew the victims of "apartheid" could have representitives in parliament, have full citizen rights and even be soldiers of this so called apartheid state. You are confused.
You forgot the Kingdom of the Nabaeteen which is current day Jordan and it’s borders spread to the Mideterinean. Your history is missing lots of facts Rudy. Jews lived in two Kingdoms, the Kingdom of Himyar in South Arabia, and the Kingdom of Khazaria somewhere near the Russian Empire. The ones in Judea at the times of the Romans were a tiny tribe whom of which converted forcibly to Christianity, just like their brethrens in Himyar. So Philistines or not, it does not give Jews, converts from all around the world, to claim it as their ancestral land.
This is very Biased I must say. Also If I would use Native Americans as an example I know it's not very similar, however they lived here before Europeans invaded the continent. If Natives then decided to say well this is our country we should take it back...... it would be valid but this has happened in a lot of other countries and it's called LIFE. But thinking you have the rights to a land because your ancestors lived there thousands of years ago is very delusional. Btw i'm of Armenian decent so trust me, I know about genocide my people suffered too, so don't try to come at me with you are anti Semitic because I'm simply not. Trust me if i lived somewhere and someone came to kick me out of my house because their claims were well my ancestors were here long time ago and this is my land now even if this was your house for the last 20 years I will definitely not take the B.S and not leave my house, but Palestinians did not have a choice.... so instead of being so bias learn to live together and respect each others..... unity is what will solve this problem.
Genesis 32:28 - KJV “And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.”
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Th Roman general replaced the Kingdom of Judea with Palestina-Syria, over time it was Palestine. The Ottoman Empire gave a completely different name. The British Mandate used the term Palestine as a territory not a sovereign state. Jews and Arabs living there were referred to Palestinians. It was Arafat in 1965 that developed the terms, Palestine and Palestinian as an identity.
history is subjective...palestinians probably state to be the indigenous people...in reality "jews" and "palestinians" probably have the same ancestors and therfore have equal claim to the region...
@Almog Zabari The fact is that they lived together for some time, before Gangs started vandalism acts. Nations occupy one another over history, but the removal of inhabitants was only on the agenda of the worst!
Very good thanks. Though there is more to the palastinian name and origins and usage, but in general you put so much on the table that it can't be faulted by an omission of nuances. Good work. The conclusion is how it should be.
"once upon a time it was called Israel" - you are referring to time: 11century - 8century BEFORE CHRIST... SINCE 720 BC there was NO MORE Israel. Since 1century it is a land of Palestine. Therefore these people (Palestinians) HAVE the right to live there. You can live there TOGETHER in peace, as Palestinians have been doing since Jews arrived in Palestinian land after the WW II, you do not need to exterminate them and selfishly take their land as claimed "historically yours" just because it was once called Israel in 11BC! If that's so then why don't we check who lived in that land before 11BC and give this land to them Huh? Absolute nonse
@@bamssudardjo2572 Palestine is not only home for Muslims but also for Christians. As a country, it is existing since 1AD. So I guess those "islamic guys" have been residing there much longer than Izrael.
It was Roman emperor Hadrian who renamed Israel into Palestine after crushing a great Jewish revolt. The present Arab(so called Palestinian) had nothing to do with Palestine. Emperor Hadrian renamed it to crush the spirit of the Jews, thousands of them were deported from Judea. The Philistine were also called "Sea people", they invaded middle east in the late bronze age, they also invaded Egypt during the reign of Ramses III. Philistine were extinct race of people now
5:01 - Romans Destroyed the temple in 70AD, there is a lot of history before and after that. I understand this is not a history lesson but the land was not ever exclusively Jewish, just predominantly Jewish. There were always non jews on that land along side the Jewish population. As the land of historic Palestine is a vital land bridge between the three continents, there we a large number of empires that ruled over the land after the romans and before any Jewish empires. These empires did not rinse the land of all their inhabitants. So Its unfair to say that there was a small constant minority of Jews and that everyone else came from colonial migration. That's completely incorrect. Many of the core inhabitants of that land converted to Islam/Christianity. They did not all move in. 5:40 - The UN nations decided this after heavy lobbying by Zionists. The white house was bombarded by lobbyists and the US sent out telegrams threatening to cut foreign aid to countries who did not vote in favor of Resolution 181. The UN then voted in favor. Perhaps the vote should have been up to the Jews and Muslims and Christians living in Palestine at the time, but that's another story. 5:50 - I'm glad you chose not to debate this because that is a ridiculous argument. The arabs living in the region that was Trans Jordan received their independence. They weren't given anything, it was their land to begin with. The Arabs living in Historic Palestine got an offer for 45% of historic Palestine, The Jews were offered 55% of the land while they were only 1/3 the population after mass migration. The proposed Jewish state was going to have a MAJORITY arab population. The Palestinians were happy to share land with the Jews who lived there already, it was already the status quo and those jews have rights to the land as any arab living there did. But, they had an issue with those who illegally arrived after the Belfour declaration of 1917. No one wanted to "take" anything, however I can't say the same for zionists. 6:54 -Incorrect. There is a newspaper called "Falastin" which was founded in 1911 by Issa El-Issa. The Jewish newspaper like you mentioned, the Palestine Post (Jerusalem Post) was founded 1932. The land of the levant is typically referred to in arabic as "Balad al Sham" but the word Falastine in Arabic was still used. Conversations with my grandfather also indicate this, as he mentions that his grandfather (My great grandfather) would often boast that he traveled all over "Falastine." He would mostly bring Oranges from Jaffa to Jerusalem. 7:40 To put that intention behind using the word Palestinian is nonsense. No one can erase the history of the Israelites - Its in the Quran, and we have nothing to hide in history. No one disagrees that the Jews were historically in Palestine. We disagree with their perceived right to remove arab inhabitants from the land and claim ownership over it. There was this idea that Arabs across the middle east are homogenous and can belong to any Arab land. Those Arabs with roots in historic Palestine are called Palestinian to specify the land they are attached to. There is no threat to Jewish history at all by arabs increasingly preferring to call themselves Palestinians. The arabs and Jews and others living in historic Palestine before the Belfour declaration are the natives of the land. 1000X Moreso than anyone who just migrated in. Overall, I agree that many people are uneducated about the Jewish history, and we are absolutely cousins - the descendants of Isaac and Ishmael. I don't want to strawman you, but the undertones of the Jewish people being the sole historic population continuously living in Palestine is just straight up incorrect.
according to an algebra i just made up, two competing nationalisms just cancel each other out. therefore the druze inherit the land. long live druzereal.
Palestine was never mentioned in the Quran. But Israel and the Jewish people were mentioned numerous amount of times. The state of Israel belongs to the the Jewish people
I'm glad I found this channel, very interesting and enlightening. As Africans, we've seen the effect of rapid arabization manifest itself on North East Africa. The indigenous people of the Megreb called the Imazingh and Nubians / Copts of Sudan and Egypt are still fighting to preserve their culture and identity to this day. I support Israel in your plight to preserve your culture and identity, Islam and arabization is toxic. However, I also respect your desire for peace with your neighbour's.
I'm moroccan arab roots not amazigh Palestinians are cannanians semitic people Name palestine come from greeks but indigenouse of palestine land callled the canaanians
A Palestinian is a person living in the region falsely called Palestine. Therefore, the Jews living there are also Palestinians. Before the establishment of Israel Jews were called Palestinian Jews and Arabs were called Palestinian Arabs. There was never a Palestinian nation and still isn’t, that’s why the museum for Palestinian history is empty.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.” This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Its about time someone has balls to say the truth
It’s about time someone told the truth and said that I want his balls in my mouth
@@1moneyking lol.
It may be true but I and 15 million others identify as palestinian because we lived in the land for centuries (in a region called palestine).
So what should we identify as then?
Suhayb Yousef Arabs
@@GideonDavis half of us are probably not even arab (genetically) and other half hasnt seen mecca in 1000 years (figuratively speaking). No where else is our home, period
Kinda funny Palestinians insist to be "natives" to the land yet unironically identify themselves with a term that literally means "invaders".
And that word is actually Hebrew too *smh*
The same with Native Americans and Latinos they take the name of the invaders because they were forced to. Making fun of a people for using a name that they were forced to is pretty dumb. Jews are native there but they left because they had to and the Palestinians took the name because they had to are you dumb it’s minorities just fighting minorities because the enemy has made them fight for years it’s sad honestly who gives a fuck about the name just embrace their own brothers their own blood. I’m Latino Native American my people get killed every year but we don’t even have a country of our own but yet here are some idiots killing their own over a name self extermination at its finest.
No one forced them to use the Palestinian moniker, moreover they denounced it at first. They only embraced it as a political tool since the land was called Palestine in the times the Jews were forced out of the land and they use it as means of propaganda for those who don't know history... which is clearly the majority of people.
I don't know the history of all NA tribes so I won't pretend to know to how your identity was formed. But there isn't some monolith called minorities, it's a lie created by people that seek power through this consolidation. Do you really think Muslims and LGBT people share the expirience? And just because Muslims are minorities in the West doesn't change the fact they are majority in ME. And let me tell you a secret, the way they treat minorities in there makes the West look like paradise.
And the kings were???
And the currency was??
I love pointing out the holes in פלשתים
What people identify themselves doesn't change the fact of whether they are indigenous. Nigeria's flag, country and area was named by the British. It doesn't change the fact that their was an indigenous population that was colonised.
@@deficrypto1234 how can Arabs be indigenous to the land still associated with Jewish titles like Someria and Judea aka West Bank or Jerusalem, yet another Hebrew word, when Arabs come from Arabia and only got to this land through Caliphate which is Muslim crusade aka Imperialism.
They are as native to the land as white or black Americans are to America ...
hey, thank you for this, I'm an arab and I've always known the truth.
Same here
@@عمرالمختار-ث2م Then you're both educated Arabs
So tell me please your truth?? I am a Palestinian and I would like to know about my history??
@@AhmadAltibi You are absolutely a living person that has every right to live and you have every right to call yourself a Palestinian. If you want history of the word Palestine and of the arabic use of this word, it's in the video.
@@عمرالمختار-ث2م The term "Palestine" first appeared in the 5th century BC when the ancient Greek historian Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" between Phoenicia and Egypt in The Histories
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_name_%22Palestine%22#:~:text=The%20term%20%22Palestine%22%20first%20appeared,and%20Egypt%20in%20The%20Histories.
dosnt change the fact that we where the original owners of these lands my friend
and i can assure you these lands where owned by my grandfathers not some jew i even know there names
israel was created by great Britain they where given the choice to choose either palestine or argentina and one more place i dont remember
even the torah is rewritten today ,go and read the pentateuch(real books) which are the first 5 hebrew books of moses (jerusalem was never mentioned in them)
todays torah is rewritten based on specific individual intrests
you can argue about that but in the end u cant argue about taking someones house or land because before 2000 years ago a jew lived in it
The Truth Never Changes.
E Pearson yes yes the history of the Jews has soon because Zionist killers of the children just like pharaoh did with the Jews so yes history has changed!
@@ourstrugglemadeusstronger7403 that's why Palestinian population has increased exponentially in the past 50 yrs. Keep drinking the kool aid
@@tofujelly the population increased!?
Dumbass look at Isreal.
They were coming from all around the world taking Palestine land!
@@1moneyking come on , stop be dum ass bitch , stop fake the history , fucking liar , just Watch the video and shut up.
@@tofujelly They are afraid of the truth, love you girl ❤️🇮🇱
I’m nether Jewish nor Arab but this is still interesting.
i wish more people had a brain and the will to explore the truth and whats actually happening here and in the past. if you would ask the typical brainwashed person who hates israel or defends terrorism or thinks the arabs are the victims what is palestine he'd prob be like "uhh it was a palestinian state that was stolen by the jews 70 years ago" omegalul
@@Crackz0r94 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is nonsense, this man claimed that Palestine is a hebrew word hahahaha what an idiot.
@@stover14 You can check the origin of this name and validate what he says
@@iGoogooX okay, I just did verify it ( I didn't really need to as I don't get my history from UA-cam videos I actually read) The term "Palestine" first appeared in the 5th century BC when the ancient Greek historian Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" between Phoenicia and Egypt in The Histories. How are you even disputing this? It's hilarious to me when people correct someone when they're wrong themselves haha stop watching Jooish propoganda
Hi Rudy, yesterday without seeing this after watching one of your other videos, I looked for something concerning the origins of the Palestinians. It's refreshing to hear a channel that defends the truth about Israel rather than blaming it for everything that's wrong in the Middle East. I grew up in Christian churches, and I never went along with the anti-Israel bandwagon and I like to speak for the truth/factual accounts and moral values, so I'm interested in knowing where I can learn about the history and your preferred news and opinion sources concerning Israel and its struggles with other countries. Thank you for this channel.
What Christian churches went along with any anti-israel bandwagon? The comments in this video are truly bizarre
@@i_hate_this_world I definitely didn't mean to suggest that the Christian churches I grew up in were anti-Israel.
Rudy is a liar. Most of what he said was lies and not even real history.
I hope INDONESIANS can learn from this video. So many hypocrites in my country. I hope their eyes will open and understand that ISRAEL is real. Love you Israel from Indonesian Jew.
Indonesia 🇮🇩 tasty food
This is the best explanation regarding the origin of the word "Palestine" that I've ever heard.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
It's also not true. I can't understand why people are thinking that because this man talks with confidence and calm that he is trustworthy, when the words that come out are so obviously bigoted and from a place of disdain.
@@i_hate_this_world If you claim his explanation is not true, then explain why. Otherwise your claim is pointless.
@@Hail_Sagan @אטילה ורס sorry for interrupt.The word philistine (plistim in Hebrew) had mentioned more than 30 times in Old Testament of Bible. If believe all of u know bible write in Hebrew. Then the philistine ancient found actually are Canaanite. The canaanite that being match DNA by archeologist at West Jordan, Beirut and North Israel is same in bronze and iron age. This is reported by National Geography research. Not by religion book claim. So its prove that canaanite that mentioned in bible its true. On 2019 national geographic report that canaanite DNA found in Jews and palestinian that call arab by your people. On the same research they found more than 50% palestinian decent is no from arab but from Lavant, syria, egypt and Jordan. They found palestinian had match DNA with canaanite research by American University Beirut. But suprissing most Jewis DNA match to Canaanite nit Jews. Probably inter-marriage. The most amazing is Jews and palestinian only had around 70% match. More 90% match to Canaanite is Lebanese and lavant. This research and proven DNA reported in National Geography and registered Journal. So i think with ur ideology mean Lebanese and Lavant can come back in future claim their land too there. So learn to share my lovely Israel people. I was still under my research and collecting as much research reference by truly source. I believe Palestinian had truly right on that land.
@@i_hate_this_world I don't just trust someone if they're calm, someone could be shouting aggressively but if what their saying is based in fact (I do my own research to fact-check) then I have no problem with it. This dude is one of the very few people getting it right, y'all being played by bigots of the the past. Many different groups of people have hated jews for one reason or another.
A shame there isn't an hebrew version of this video. I wanna show it to my classmates
well it's too bad ur freinds a bunch of uneducated dumb fucks
@@abdelhakwinston6200 Well that's kind of degenerate for you to say.
@@abdelhakwinston6200 bet you have some friends like that buddy
A shame thay you are so lazy to translate into Hebrew for your classmates
@@abdelhakwinston6200 pray for Ysrael🇮🇱
may we all live and smoke weed together in peace, LOVE IS THE ANSWER! 🇮🇱❤🇵🇸
Sudani flag homie
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
@@yansideabacoa6257 dope comment but I think you pressed the wrong button while commenting. This has come up as a reply to a comment about israelis and Palestinians smoking weed together haha
You should post this again so it hopefully gets likes and seen by more!
😂
You’re amazing!! Thank you!! Please write a book!! No one has been able to expose history like this!!
Great idea! 🙂 he should write a book
Dear cousin. It goes even further than that goes back to Abraham. Everybody in the world is occupied Palestine and the Palestinians since then we are both from the same father Abraham. So we are actually Canaanites. That’s the irony of this whole thing is to very similar people fighting against each other. It has gone on for too long.
Israel by Noa Tishby
@@dannybrown5889 Noa Tishby is a HUGE anti-semite! Be honest--she is Ant -Israel! And she would even say so herself
Your argument is such a far reach. You keep saying it was called mandate of.. region of.. area of... then say Palestine and just because the word COUNTRY was not used "according to you" does not mean it doesnt exist. You can't justify the creation of Israel with trying to restore an injustice that happened THOUSANDS of years ago. That is way far back, without mentioning all the empire takeovers that happened after that and that included other areas around Palestine such as Lebanon, Syria Iraq, etc... Would you then argue that these countries don't exist because they weren't one society speaking one language?? And what about BEFORE Judea? Before the founding of Judaism? No one lived there?
That video as a whole was a ridiculous to justify the legitimacy of Israel who today is an ethostate that treats its non-jew citizens as second class citizens and is willing to give full citizenship to people from anywhere in the world if they have converted to Judaism.
You forgot to mention that there are Arb Israelis that they are the citizens of Israel, with Israeli IDs.
@@ffff-ll5is so?
They would complain equally if there was no such thing as a convert: let's just be realistic about that...
Why can’t you people just get it in your head that the Jews came back to decolonize their own ancestral lands? The Arabs even fought them for it and LOST that’s how the game is played.
I came here expecting to not like your channel. You’re one of the more well spoken and educated young people I’ve seen in a while. So I’m listening and at least learning your side.
He is the best at explaining the facts without emotion. Unfortunately the far left university types like to change history
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
How about you go mind your own business, there is no side for you to chose. Go drink a vegan gluten-free latte and watch some Marvel movies.
Do be aware that what he is saying is bigoted and hateful. He is saying things confidently and calmly, but the words themselves (eg. saying that the word Palestine was given by Jews and was just an insult) feeds an ugly sense of entitlement in anyone with supremacist beliefs.
He is portraying his theories as fact when they are very far from them. There are actually facts from well-regarded publications and people that disprove his versions which makes me more inclined to think that this isn't just a misguided take on information, but a deliberately hateful speech.
@@i_hate_this_world he speaks the truth!!!!!!
About time someone makes an informative video about this
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Informative? The man fails to even mention 1200 years of Palestinian history including The seljuiks, ottomans, rashuidins and more
@@axela4606 go and have a cry you wombat
The Ottomans did not use the word "Palestine" it is a British invention. In the Ottoman administrative system, those places were called the Saida Eyalet. Quds, Syria, Lebanon were also used as official province names but the Ottomans have never used the word Palestine to name any place on the earth.
@@user-pi4su6je8p The Ottoman did not use the word for centuries, other than history books there was no Palestine at all.
@@user-pi4su6je8p The Ottomans did not use the word for centuries, other than history books there was no Palestine at all. We have many petitions in the Ottoman archives that were written by western visitors and travellers who ask permission; even in these petitions in French Italian German or English the petitioners or their ambassadors mention the word Palestine but while translating them into Turkish the Ottomans replace the word with Saida, Quds etc. This shows how they were decided to not use the word Palestine. Probably it was sounding Jewish to their ears. I don't know the exact reason why they avoided this word but obviously, they avoided it.
@@user-pi4su6je8p Dear HF, I just corrected the video I have no hidden agenda. Thank you.
The number of Jews was not high because the Ottomans did not give residence permits to them. Otherwise, there were always many Jews who are very willing to migrate to Jerusalem, but the government did not let them do. Nowadays the Turkish government is proud of this policy.
@@user-pi4su6je8p Dear HF why do attack me insistently in such an aggressive manner with a fake user name? Now you did accept that the Ottomans did not allow the Jews to migrate to Israel. But you continue to accuse me of unnecessary things.
My comment was that the Ottomans did not use the word Palestine, and it seems that you had already known this fact but you pretended that you don't know it only to attack me. Why can't you just accept the truth? This is your problem, not mine.
I don't want to think that you assume that before 1882, it was free to settle in any city of the Ottoman Empire (let alone Jerusalem). So I guess you can't be that ignorant, again, you're after another fraud.
However, keeping my wishful thinking still, I want you to know that this is never the case. Ottoman settlement policy did not allow the Jewish population to increase in any city (an exception can be the ones in Greece). And you can be absolutely sure that the Jewish population did not increase in and around Jerusalem only as a result of the Ottoman government's policy. It was a deliberate limitation. This was even true for the Christians.
So please stop abusing my time and good intention.
@@user-pi4su6je8p because you did not watch the video. I just corrected a mistake there but you cannot understand it.
There is no place name "Palestine" in the Ottoman Empire but in the video, they argue that the Ottomans used it, that is all.
Why do you react so aggressively?
It is extremely important to know this fact to understand how the British introduced this country name after the first world war. The Arabs were not sovereign before the great war. Besides, if they were sovereign, they would not have given this name to their country.
אחי אני התחלתי לצפות בערוץ שלך וזה נורא כיף לדעת שמישהו באמת יודע את המאחורי הקלעים של כל החרא שמתלך אצלהם שהם בעצמם לא יודעים
The Koran in 5:20-21 says that Allah gave the Holy Land (Israel) to the Jews. How is it that Muslims don't know this?
They know but its inconvenient to admit.
@@bamssudardjo2572 when you read something whose meaning escapes you then you are spouting drivel and tripe. Of course this is ubiquitous in religion.
@@bamssudardjo2572 strangely enough when Christians translate the phrase into Hebrew it is rendered as God is Big.
Jews were chosen people. Still they did crucify prophets and started taking ribah . Yet it belongs to Israelites but it is not exclusively for them. They belongs to Holi land with given conditions. If you don’t follow the conditions you won’t get ever.
Please let me know if you want to know the conditions
@@SAIYYED26 wrong. The Romans crucified him assuming he even existed. Who lied to you? Did you waste time reading the Koran?
Palestine as an "Arab" or "Muslim" entity in our hearts and minds is a relatively new concept...Nowhere in the Quran or the authentic Hadith does it mention Palestine or the Arabic word "فلسطين". There is mention of the Levant/Sham region...There is mention of the people of the Levant...There is mention of Al-Quds/Jerusalem and the blessings of the city and the land around Al-Quds. There is mention of the blessings of praying in Al-Quds... But there is no mention of the fake "Palestine". The Romans named it Palestine! Then when the Romans converted to Christianity, it ended up being a western Christian name for the Holy land. When the Muslims ruled it that name was never used! Then when the British controlled it once the Ottoman Empire collapsed they brought that name back.
When the Muslims ruled it they didn't call it "Palestine". If you look at old Ottoman Turk maps of the region, there is no mention of "Palestine"... It's a lie!
Palestine as an Arab entity grew during World Wars 1&2 along with the growth of the Pan-Arabism ideology...Pan-Arabism was the tree and Palestine was just a small branch... The tree fell and Pan-Arabism died. Yet people are still holding on to that small branch when there are far important matters at hand.
كل الاحترام.
لا يمكنك وضعه بشكل أفضل.
You know nothing. Before Moses left egypt the region where Jerusalem located qas called Canaan. When Israelites recieve mandate from their God it was called promise land for them by God. After 40 years they have rich Canaan and make war with the canaanites. They conquer the north and south of the region. The southern is where the 2 tribes of israel positioned. It's called Judah. And the philistines or Palestinian are settlers where gaza strip now they called sea peoples they are non canaanites who live in the coastal area of canaan. They're not natives to that area. Jewish is the true owner of that land because God commanded them to conquer the canaanites and it is for them israelites not the muslim or any other groups. Understand?
It is the land of Canaan and those who first inhabited it were Canaanites, and my ancestors are Palestinians. The land was never for the children of Israel. They were guests in it. And the earth is inherited by righteous people
haha😂 the Israelities are cnaanaites the Palestinenians are Arabs stop trying to twist the facts@@asmahermasa8288
@@thedropoutfarmer3128Israelities was simply cnaanaites the Palestinenians today are Arabs from different Arab and Muslim countries
One correction here, the Philistine did survive David as a group around the Pentapolis. The displacement of the Philistines didn't occur till the Assyrians, who would do the same to the Israelites/Samaritans and vassalize Judea. Excluding the early Arab invaders, by the time of the Crusades the land was not known as Palestine. It was known as Syrian, just like under the Ottomans. While there were many attempts of create smaller kingdoms within the Ottoman Levant, outside of Syria, the only identifiable group trying to gain an identity during this time were the Maronite Christians where the modern state of Lebanon is from, although the French made it larger, causing a much smaller Maronite population. There was no Palestine, there was no Jordan. There was a Kindgom of Jerusalem. The land of Palestine is is name kept alive by Christians and the west. They called the land Palestine during the crusades, not the Arabs. This is why you have people in the west refer to Judea at the time of Jesus as Palestine at the time of Jesus. They associate a name to the land that was not called that until a 100 years after the death of Jesus.
And while the Hebrew definition of Palestine/Philistine is different, but it looks like the Latin Palestine is related to the Greek word pelasgian, so not only was it an insult to Jews, it was a greco-roman claim to the land. They knew the Philistines were ancient Greeks.
My history teacher always tell us that if we want to learn *true* history we should learn it from neutral person
For real
Which means a blind and deaf person.
Not really. Well maybe just not in this case. A forgiener can't describe thousands upon thousands of rockets that are fired in Israel and what is going on in Israel right know
Neutral? The guy is a Zionist jew lmao
Or create a time machine and go back in time
The problem with neutral person is not having any idea what happened because that is doesn't related to them
Example: would you teach about China-Japan history if you know that?
How would both nations feel when someone who wasn't born in their culture will represent their history not 100% accurately?
The name "Palestine" was appropriated by the British mandate in 1917, following WWI. But prior to that, during the nearly 400 years of the Ottoman rule, the land was part of "El-Sham", the southern part of Syria province. in the 400 years under the Seljuks who preceded the Ottomans, there was also no mention of "Palestine", in much the same way as there wasn't any mention of "Palestine" under the Crusader kingdom or the Abbasid/Fatimid early muslim empires.
It’s Syrian then 😉
@Suleyman 🇸🇾 yes the whole region, Syria, Palestine/Israel, Jordan and Lebanon are countries in modern day Bilad asSham/Levant
Bibles from the 1700 have maps with the name Palestine on it.
Rudy love your videos and the work that you do. Keep up the good work.
thank you rudy, im a jew from dagestan in russia, i actually did not know this, and im learning much from your videos about jewish peoples history! thank you !
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Do look at many sources and try to make up your own mind. This video has some questionable theories portrayed as facts. Some of what is said is actually contradictory to some well-establish facts. There are a few comments already here with the information.
Knowledge is important. And a critical mind is essential to gain knowledge.
Fam you're so gross to lie like that, there's bloody documentation of Armenians in Palestine identifying strictly as Palestinian, all what you said is lies, scholars have identified as strictly Palestinian since the 14th century at least, absolutely disgusting to try to sound non-racist/revisionist. And enough with the Jordan argument, it didn't exist and was known as the empty quarter, most of them, Christian and Muslim, were unsettled Bedouins a few generations ago, and it's a non-argument anyway, like Christopher Hitchens said, if an Americans from a state was exiled from his own he will no back down without a fight despite having 49 other states to go to, they all still have their own identity. Absolutely infuriating video.
My family left Italy from Palestinian as Orthodox Jews 500 years ago and married other Sephardic Jews. Oh, my heart loves Israel.. we eventually became Catholic. But I converted back to Judaism.
What made you reject Yeshua? I get leaving Roman Catholicism btw.
@@justchilling704 about 2 years after I converted, I picked up a bug from the hospital unit I was working on ( I’m an RN).. I went into septic shock and now I’m a below the knee and left toes amputee. In the depths of my heart I don’t feel I left Yeshusa, but a Constantinople view of him. I now have returned. I’ve not uncoverted, why?
Because, Judaism is truth just lacking Yeshusa Messiah. When he returns and establishes his kingdom..Torah will be taught in truth and the world will heal. Amen let’s pray for that day. Like me I’m a whole person, but lack a part. I’m in pain.. the world is in pain, I’m waiting for my Yeshusa.
He's gorgeous
That was so good, Rudy.
You would make an amazing statesman.
It’s Shabbot where I am in a few hours so you’re probably in it right now but want to wish you a belated Shabbat Shalom.
Shabbat not shabbot...
@@etamlak8199 My apologies.
Ethnically Jewish and am learning now.
My parents tried but didn’t listen
I get Shabbos Shalom and Shabbat Shalom confused
Again, my apologies and thanks for pointing it out to me or I won’t learn.
Peace
@@nicolasfeduccia9573 You most likeky confused it with Shabbes, the yiddish word for it, used by some haredi communities cause they believe they should not speak hebrew outside of prayers... Another rabbit hole... Anyway.
Thank you for your thoughtful words and the honest presentation without being confrontational. Those of us that know the truth appreciate it!
Spread the truth!
Truth shall set us free!
Anton Adelson the truth you don’t even be told the truth as kids like Santa Claus is coming down the chimney on 24th December. The land belongs to the holy peaceful people not Zionist!!!
Set you free from what huh. You're not trapped in your country and watching people getting killed every day are you?
Joane. K my people are getting killed every day by Zionist you don’t even spare the young children so yes you are the new pharaoh. Do you think there won’t be another Moses that will rise again and free my people from your high walls and water cuts guns and nuks yes there’s one he is coming soon He will stand against your false messiah the anti christ!!!
@@ourstrugglemadeusstronger7403 if you're talking about palistine then everything you said is true if you weren't then everything you said was false
I’m talking about the Zionist Jews even though they are not real Jews have you ever read the Old Testament and tried seeking the truth??
The fact that you said that Palestine had no national identity prior back when the Ottomans controlled it is so wrong. Mufti Khayr al-Din al-Ramli literally wrote in legal documents back in 1670 saying "our country of Filastin". Palestine was not its own country but an Ottoman military district.
yes and if you say that then you have Israel as well and Judea in the same region
Doesn't Israel in Filastin?
One of the best and most informative videos I've seen on this topic. Thank you for this.
Nope
Bruh I see here people that say it's a lie. I'm shocked that in this age, 2021, people turn their back to facts and history. This are facts I learned that in school last year
This is most likely written by provocateurs and bots. Or just very uneducated people.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
from my opinion the only way to move forward is by having a federal government controlling both states, no borders, no discrimination just one country with two or three states with a whole new name and a new flag.
In my opinion, the only way forward is to have the Jews exert sovereignty in their land and the other groups accept it or leave. That will bring both peace and justice ✌️⚖️🙏
@normalcy kid If you consider "dumbass" a respectful and accepting way of addressing someone, I then respectfully invite you to fuck yourself. Best regards.
Rudy I watched many of your Videos. You are doing such great job. I am really glad there are people Like you out there sharing the Knowlede and being active and bringing change. and I am so tired of all that hate and craziness people project on each other its exhausting.
I wish you all the best and lets hope the World will calm down again and people will Make a Step towards each other more again.
80% of modern day Palestinians can trace their DNA back to the Canaanites. The original inhabitants of the land. Either he’s greatly misinformed or he’s deliberately spreading misinformation. The author of the Balfour declaration, Theodore Herzl (Aka the founding father of Israel), had 3 locations in mind when choosing a ‘homeland’ for the Jewish zionists, which were Palestine, East Africa and Argentina. They obviously chose Palestine, and here we are today. They’re displacing the indigenous inhabitants of the land and try to undermine their history. Most Zionist today trace their lineage to the Khazars who were Turkic from the region of modern day Russia.
Sources?
A lot of Palestinians have Jewish DNA from the force conversions of the Islamic invasion. Arabs come from the Arabian peninsula. Period. If Palestinians are the original inhabitants of the Levant, WHY ARE THERE ONLY JEWISH ARCHEOLOGICAL ARTIFACTS there?
Many Palestinians have Jewish DNA most likely from forced conversions during the Islamic invasion. Palestinians are not Canaanites because Africans and Arabs are two distinct ethnic groups. Why are there Jewish archeological sites everywhere and no “Palestinian”? Duhhhh
1:59 you ignored the fact that the word Palestine is also mentioned in many Classical Greek sources
Yea from the Philistines, not Arabs that now call themselves Palestinian.
Rudy Rochman yes, but even so, it gives in opportunity for people to try to discredit by saying that the Greeks mentioned the philistines. Writers such as Herodotus
@@yakigesher-zion7289 Yes the Philistines, which are also mentioned many times in historical scriptures by the Jews. This population has nothing to do with the Arabs of today that identify as "Palestinian".
Rudy Rochman even then one should still acknowledge that it was mentioned. There are actually a lot of interesting theories of the origin of the name “Palestine” one being that it is the Greek translation of “Israel” as “Palaistis” means “wrestler” as Israel means “wrestled with god”. The Greeks also used the word Palestine to refer to a larger area of Eretz Yisrael
@@yakigesher-zion7289 Israel means here dwells god
I have been alive long enough to remember (yep, I'm old) when the problem was Arab vs Israeli. Palestinians (people who lived in the area of Palestine, Arabs, Jews, Christians, whoever) came into the fore in the 60's with the failure of Arab armies to defeat Israel. That struck me then as probably a much more successful tactic. In 1977 a PLO spokesman said it publicly - The Palestinian "people" do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means of continuing the struggle against Israel and our Arab unity.
I have always wondered why the incredibly wealthy Gulf states or Saudis do not solve the Palestinian problem. They could build them cities in the desert and make them bloom. Makes me think they prefer them being where they are. Only a thought.
"The palestinian problem". That is disgusting. You want to displace people, Just like the romans did to jews. It is amazing how history repeats itself, now with a different people.
YOU ARE DOING A HOLLY WORK, THANK YOU.
כל הכבוד לך על ההסבר המפורט והמדוייק הזה, העולם צריך לדעת את הדברים שבתקשורת מנסים להסתיר.
chris sim
Palestinians are the descendants of Canaanites and Arabs so they are indigenous and native of the Holy Land.
The real Arabs and Bnei Yesrael carry the Haplogroup J1
The majority of Arab tribes ( Qahtani and Adnani ) from Yemen, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf region , Levantine, Iraq, Egypt and North Africa carry the Haplogroup J1
About 45% of Cohanim Jews ( descendants of Aharon ) carry the Haplogroup J1
Famous Jewish families ( Ashkenazim and Mizrahim ) carry the Haplogroup J1
Arab Christians in Levantine carry the Haplogroup J1
Majority of Yemenite Jews carry the Haplogroup J1 ( majority of the Yemenite Jews are Arabs from Kholan and Hemyar tribes )
A new study of ancient Canaanites DNA reveals that " Saudi Arabians,Bedouins and Iranian Jews had the highest percentage of ancestry matching that of the Canaanites, followed by Palestinians, Jordanians and Syrians."
Majority of them carry the Haplogroup J1 , read the study as follow :
www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/05/dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews/
twitter.com/haaretzcom/status/1266237684101476355
@@mujemoabraham6522 Canaanites were from Africa, btw. They came and settled on the land from there, so this argument isn't logical.
Barack Obama Canaanites were not “black” lol. The term Canaanites refers to different groups of people living in the region of Canaan. Israelites (Jews) were Canaanites, as well as Phoenicians (Lebanese people), and a few others.
@@joshua8774 so basically the land is rightfully everyone's by ancestral birthright. And what Israel is doing is wrong and illegal because it's choosing 1 group of people among many to be the rightful owners of that land.
@@nizarshawwa3704 actually the Israelites are the only surviving group. the rest of the group went extinct or merge with other groups. The modern Palestinian are actually descended from the area of Saudi Arabia.
Are you joking me? Palestine is Judea.
There is no identity to decide.
It's same same different name, they are from Syria.
Arabs cant even pronounce P. Do you see the problem here??
Roman empire gave Judea the name Palestine after bar kochba revolt. They emigrated Arabs from Syria mainly to take revenge on the Jews.
Saying that they are people is basically say they have the right to claim anything. The entire history shows that the Jewish people always lived here. The Qur'an does not even mention the word Jerusalem once. There is much to say but i just don't see the point.
Scotland also kept the romans away. They were that terrified of us Celts that they built a wall to protect themselves from us Celts from attacking them. So Scotland wasn’t conquered by Rome. Alba gu bràth 🏴
You where colonised by the English though lol. Just kidding
@@YamnayaSintashtell that to Edward II of England and the Battle of Bannockburn lol 😂
What an amazing video!
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Rudy the OFFICIAL propagandamachine of israhell. Don't be fooled by his calm appearance. He is an actor.
@@yansideabacoa6257 you do not understand the languages used here. p-l-s means invader (migrants forcefully arriving uninvited like the Sea Peoples)in Hebrew and related Semitic languages. Falasha is used to describe Ethiopians Immigrants and falash mura. Modern local Arabs say Balestina because they have no 'F'. Hebrew has both p and f.
Now I know why Palestine and Philistine sound similar.
@Channel that is true bro
It’s also called “falestine””فلسطين"in Arabic almost the same pronunciation as philistine
@@ratsbelongnowhere2548 that come from Rome Empire to insult Israel, in the end falestine is false name
Longordon1 yes I know I’m just saying it’s pronounced in hebrew just like in Arabic as philistine and not like how Palestine is pronounced
@@ratsbelongnowhere2548 ok bro, thanks for that information
Rudy, since you appear to be so knowledgeable of the region and truly wants to seek ways of making peace between both the Jews and the Palestinian people of Israel (which I find most refreshing) realizing the corruption of their current leaders , would you be willing to write an Op Ed piece in the NY Times stating your views that will hopefully help combat some of the anti-Israel bias that currently exists both within the NY Times and in all the Ultra left progressive movements today. I believe it is truly heroic what you are trying to accomplish and wish you much hatzlacha and success
he is a great explainer, he should post articles and debvunk palestinian lies
the anti Israeli articles in the NYT is due to the reason of the new antisemitism and it doesn't help for any explanation
Hi Josh,
Can you tell me some things that are there in the coverage of the Times which show an anti-Israel bias? Please enlighten me if you have a few moments, because til now I haven't seen it in the current coverage. Thanks.
It's true that there is corruption on _both_ sides of the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians but the problem isn't with the ultra-left progressive movement, it's with the ultra right fascist apartheid policies of the State of Israel. I agree that Rudy seems more knowledgeable than most but then much of that is due to explicit suppression of the truth and efforts to rewrite history by the Israeli government. There really can't be any peace until Israel accepts what they did to the original inhabitants of the area.
@@L98fiero "What they did to the original inhabitants." If you look at the facts, you'll see that much of that is propaganda too.
“Palestine” could just be a Greek way of saying “Israel” (both words come from “wrestle” respectively.)
There is no Israel anymore only Palestine. Jewish Palestines may exist but the rest are Jews from other countries who have no right over that land anymore
@Ми - армія України 🇺🇦 There is no Ukraine
@Ми - армія України 🇺🇦 There is no Ukraine. It belongs to Russia
Hi Rudy, this is a nice video portraying a lot of hope for a better and peaceful future :-)
That said, I must add an important comment regarding your saying on 5.40min "the United Nations decided to split up the land into 2". Well, the United Nations cannot decide such things Rudy. Both the United Nations General Assembly and - in most cases - the International Court of Justice have advisory powers only. This is very fundamental. Many people think that the UN is some kind of a powerful world government but that is not true at all. It is mainly an administrative organization.
You mentioned the year 1948. I assume you meant the UN Palestine partition plan of 1947.
Many people tend to think that UN resolutions and plans are binding. This is usually not the case. This also includes the 1947 UN Palestine Partition Plan (resolution 181). It could have been legally binding however the Arabs rejected it. What IS legally binding are international agreements such as, in this case, the Mandate for Palestine (1922) which was signed by all members of the League of Nations including former occupier Turkey and which was later also accepted by the UN.
(I know your comment is from 2 years ago, but hoping you notice this:)
Could you please explain a little more?
I've been trying to learn about the conflict, but I still have a lot of questions.
if the UN couldn't decide on the land, then who gets to decide the borders? and what happens if there are no international agreements?
since the borders changed a few times in history (with Egypt and Jordan) then what are the parts that are considered occupied now, and how are those determined?
@@ansamgroshong Hi Ansam, the UN (usually) does not get to decide about land(s) and borders. I wrote usually because they did come out with a partition plan for Palestine in 1947 (resolution 181). Although a plan by itself is judicially non binding in terms of international law, however, if that plan was accepted and signed by both Jews and Arabs then (and only then) it would have become legal under international law and so its borders too. But since the Arabs rejected it then that plan became meaningless. What many people call 'the borders of 1948' were actually not recognized borders rather armistice lines (cease fire lines). After the peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan in the 70s and 90s they became recognized borders. Therefore the (internationally recognized) borders with Egypt and Jordan did not "change a few times in history" as your words suggested.
Many countries around the world did not even go through any 'judicial process' and indeed no international agreements! That was not the case with the Palestine region, the Levant (and including today's Iraq). The reason that this region did go through a judicial process lays at the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the end of WW1 (they ruled that whole region). At that point the League of Nations (the organization that preceded the UN) appointed the winning powers, Great Britain and France, to establish mandates in that region. The mandates that were established were the Mandate for Greater Syria (which then included Lebanon), the Mandate for Mesopotamia (Iraq) and the Mandate for Palestine. And the goal was that France and GB would assist the local populations towards establishing their independence asap. The mandates were legally binding under international law, signed by all members of the League of Nations including the defeated country Turkey.
I hope this clarifies things a bit?
@@danitadmor
thank you. I appreciate your taking the time to explain and write all this.
I did have another question. but i just need a day or two to write again (takes me some effort to write - medical problems).
@@danitadmor
Hello
yes I understand the clarification you made about the UN
Re what I wrote, yes I guess I wasn’t accurate. I only meant the control over the land changed, but I didn’t know what changes were considered agreed on borders and which weren’t.
I went over your reply more than once and I think you answered everything.
(You really explain well. Thank you).
I’m from Iraq (though now I live in the US) so I know about the ottomans but I didn’t know the details you wrote. It wasn’t only till some years go when I started to think how we always thought of the western countries as the occupiers and colonizers, but nobody talks about the ottomans.
As re Israel- Palestine conflict, I don’t know if you’re aware we have a very very different story on the other side.
Earlier this year I came across some videos by an Israeli person (a tour guide) on youtube, and I was surprised how all he said was different from what I had known (or thought had known). I’ve learned more since then, esp after Oct 7. My view has changed completely.
I meant to ask about the settlements, but I think maybe I better wait and find some videos. I don't want to make it too much for you.
Maybe one question: (if ok):
a few have mentioned the Jordan (or Transjordan) too was part of the mandate of Palestine, and say therefore the arabs already had a bigger part. But not all Israeli supporters mention this. Is it a debated issue?
Thank you again.
@@ansamgroshong You're welcome Ansam, and no problem for asking the questions!
(that's what we're for, not? ;-)
Indeed many people have many stories to tell about the Israel-Palestine conflict but what I wrote earlier wasn't a story rather international law: the Mandate for Palestine.
You can read the contents of the mandate on the site of the UN (I think I cannot send links here..?)
As I mentioned earlier, with the fall of the Ottoman Empire, the winning forces of Great Britain and France got control over the remaining areas of the Middle East that used to belong to the Ottomans. That was Iraq, Greater Syria and Palestine. Political rights under the mandates of Iraq and Greater Syria were given to the Arab populations in those areas whereas in Palestine (which at first Transjordan was indeed included in) were given to the Jews. But 2 years later Great Britain decided to separate Transjordan (which amounts for 74% of Palestine) from 'western Palestine' and give that area to the Hashemites. Jews were no longer allowed to settle in that area. So when the actual Mandate for Palestine was signed in 1922-1923, Transjordan was excluded from it. But, according to the mandate, Jews were (and, as long as no new international agreements are signed/finalized also - are) allowed to settle in all of the remining areas of Palestine west from the Jordan river (and they are even encouraged to do so according to the international community!) - this is all to be found in the mandate. The mandate, except for the fact that the British have returned it back then to the UN and as long as no new international agreements have been signed/finalized, is valid up to this day.
Fight for your existence brother ....wishesfrom indian hindu ..... i can also understand your pain ...we faced these from 1000 years
Very interesting!! Makes so much sense.
It seems you think the issue is more to do with who came to the land first and should be there. When speaking to Palestinians they're argument isn't that Jewish History didn't exist but that the Palestinians have their own history too. But you speak of them as if they don't have a 2000 year history.
I think the main issue is that Zionist want Israel to be a 'Jewish State' but that's not possible with a community of a few million Arabs. If israel were to drop the 'Jewish State' idea and allow full rights to all people, especially voting, then maybe we'll start moving in a good direction.
Majority Jewish Israel = Killing and displacing the Palestinian Arabs. That's not okay.
Rudy is one of those who respects Palestinians and their own heritage. In the end of the vid he said there’s no future with no Palestinians and no future without Israelis in this land. So no, he is not one of those extreme Jews that want to kick out people. He is a good guy, I met him in person. I’m half Polish half Arab Palestinian born in Israel.
Democratic Jewish country doesn’t contradict the fact that Arabs can and will live there freely. The issue is that many of them want Sharia law and other stuff. Which is... passé. I lived there and it’s really ok. Much better than life in Jordan or Egypt, not only from economic perspective but organization and caring about infrastructure, technology, job opportunities, freedom of speech, healthcare, education. I just want from Israelis to recognize the fact that Palestinians are a nation with its own flag, anthem and Arabic language. We can make as a federation like Russia did with Chechnya. They had over 10 years of bloodshed, Grozny was a ruin. And now? It’s very prosperous. Same thing can be with Palestine if we agree to a federation. So Israel will be called the Federation of Israel, being a democratic Jewish State. And I put Democratic before Jewish cause I want Israel to be a secular place that respects all of its citizens.
@@SebaX92 This is very beautiful. Thank you for sharing and educating me more on the topic.
I have a personal issue where I dearly wish to visit Jerusalem and the holy land but the Israelis will stop me at all costs from doing this.
Hopefully one day we can see that land in peace with love and respect for all.
@@MrHRanjha I also hope for that. I live today in Poland. There's a nation inside Poland called Kashubians, they are having they're own language, flag and anthem, living in north west Poland. They're respected and part of the whole country. I do wish same thing can be with the Palestinians, to be respected citizens with all rights and acknowledgement. My family is still in Israel.
The issue today is Iran that wants to make chaos - in the middle East as a whole. They're doing it with Turkey btw. Syria and Lebanon are a good example, Iraq is now for Iran just like Belarus to Russia - a puppet state.
I'm not hating Iranians but many elderly people are saying that there's a prophecy saying that a mighty army will come from the east to destroy Israel and it'll be in judgement day "Yaum Al Kiyama" . And in that day the sun will rise from the west. In that term we can understand that it's in Saudi Arabia and Jordan perspective - so means that a nuclear blast will be in Israel and will be bright like the sun rise. Which will begin a nuclear war and the end of humanity. The judgment day 😞
@@SebaX92 What you've told me of the Kashubians is very interesting. I wonder if there is any videos about them on UA-cam...
It reminds me of a similar case where I come from, Pakistan. Our western most regions in the mountains has groups of people who are their own ethnicity (they look like europeans as they descend from alexanders people), speak their own language and some even have their own religions and cultures. These people have lived remotely in the mountain for thousands of years.
The thing is, us Pakistanis don't consider them as Pakistani (they request this). They have a stronger link with the Afghans and would actually like to be part of Afghanistan. But due to the insane political climate in Afghanistan for so long it's been difficult for Pakistan to officially gift the land to the Afgans.
So for the moment, that land is considered part of Pakistan as it falls under Pakistani border however they are free to govern themselves as they wish. Pakistan simply gifts them with security and protection. Nothing else.
The worst part of it all is that they actually have strong links to the Taliban and are the reason th Western media are able to say Pakistan has terrorist camps.
When you look at a map with no knowledge of the land and people then yes Pakistan does. But when you know about the Afghans living independently in the mountains you come to realise all of these camps are in their territory. Territory Pakistan has zero control over.
In regards to your theory about Iran and Turkey, I have heard this before. And iv also heard the opposite from the other side. As a Muslim that is not from that region I am able to look at this from an informed outside perspective.
It seems there is a bigger problem here from which all of these smaller problems are coming from. There are over 50 Muslim majority countries in the world. The Muslim population is not only huge but extremely strong which is why there have been so many Muslim empires that have ruled big parts of the world. It has been a long time now since a Muslim empire ever existed. The West (Brit, Europe, America etc) split the muslims apart and have not only done a great job of it but are currently maintaning it very well too.
If the muslims were to get back together and become one empire with one empire that would be the end of the Unitied Nations, the end of Nato, the end of Russia. The muslims will very quickly take over the world!
What I believe is going on here is simply politics. The current rulers of the world are making sure the muslims fight each other so they can't join forces and take over. - What this means is, everybody is bad. All of the bad people have been put in power in order to make sure the muslims keep fighting each other. Turkey, Iran, UAE, Saudi, every single one of the leaders are just as evil as each other behind closed doors. If they werent evil, they simply wouldnt be in power.
why is no one asks if the palestinians are the same people that lived long time ago on this land but converted to other religions and the jew people that came from europe also converted to judaism
Shalom from Kosovo, this guys so young and knowledgeable , should go in more debates in other channels .
Ce que tu dis là je ne cesse de le répéter partout. Souvent dans des pays arabes où je voyage beaucoup. Je m’identifie totalement à ta démarche.
Moi aussi
יפה מאוד! ממש מוכשר צריך עוד אנשים כמוך
I want to learn to speak Hebrew I love the language
Palaistis is Greek indeed and it means "wrestler". You are mixed genes. Religiously too, you are cousins, from Abraham
It's funny that this is even something that Rudy would address when the history of Jews is arguably just as convoluted as the Palestinian history is being painted in this video - and Rudy eludes to this notion in the video without really providing a balanced summation. Also, modern Isreal didn't exist before 1949, and Jews come from several tribes and many have a significant European heritage. So what is the point of this video?
Jews always had a connection to the Israeli land in their prayers and cultural rituals. It’s our promised land no matter if our enemies want to take it away from us we’ll always return as god promised to our ancient fathers. We’re welcoming the Palestinians to live with us in peace but they want to take away our entire country and we’ll fight till death before we’ll let it happen. Stop fighting the jewish people and god will bless the entire world. Peace for the Middle East inshalla
Could you tell me when Palestine was born, and when Judea was born? I’ll wait.
@@elizabethspring2208 Judea existed over three and a half thousand years ago. This is where the children of Israel (descendants of Jacob) settled after leaving Egypt and took their name, Jews from the land. Palastine as a region, it was never considered a country was named by the Romans two thousand years ago. This was like America losing to Japan in World War 2 and being renamed Hitler land as an insult to be endured every day.
Show me “Palestinian” artifacts, I’ll wait. 😂
Blessed are the peacemakers ✌
אין לך מושג עד כמה אני מעריך אותך ואת כל מה שאתה עושה. גיליתי את הערוץ שלך היום ואני לא מספיק לראות סרטונים. תמשיך ככה! תודה רבה. סוף סוף יש לנו מישהו עם קול שלא מפחד להגיד את האמת
רק היום?! טוב אני מבין שחיפשת משהו בנושא בגלל כל המצב אבל יאללה לך תראה עוד סרטונים שלו!
@@masterbrawler6061 כע...זה צץ לי ביוטיוב הקטע עם הנאצי שהוא דיבר איתו והתעניינתי והתחלתי לראות עוד דברים שלו ואני מכור אליו עכשיו הוא מדהים.
@@boiboi3403 huh
I’m so sorry some my heritage is Italian, but I’m Sephardic also. You are so right.
Israel was under Roman rule until the Ottomans took over (Pompey subjugated Israel at least 100 years before the temple was destroyed)... then the British came and kicked the ottomans out (the ottoman empire dissolved) Britain retained control for approx. 30 years under a mandate from the League of Nations. It was Churchill that split palestine (white paper of 1922) The palestinians were never an independent or separate nation, they merely occupied the ottoman empire territories (a "province" called palestine)
What was the Nakba ? What about the mass migration of European Jews to Palestine ? Again, biased review to negate the fact that Arab people were the majority of people living on the land before the UN (with no right) decided to split the land and start giving it away to European Jews who migrated from Germany and other European countries. Despite all of this, the Jews living in the land that were once called Palestinians, a large amount converted to Muslims. They're were the Jews living in the land 2000 years ago. Also right now who is being oppressed, who are living in the wrong side of the apartheid state created by Israel and who's being forcible removed from them homes. Who's being bombed indiscriminately under the guise of self defense against terrorism. It's very clear what is happening. The human rights violations and war crimes and atrocities being committed with impunity against an impoverished people who cannot defend themselves and have had to turn to a terrorist organization for defense. It has nothing to do with hating Jews or not wanting Jews to have their own state and everything to do with fighting for the rights of an oppressed people being treated Unjustly.
May Allah bless you, Rudy!
I like how you mentioned terrorism from the PLO, But no Israeli killed Palestinian ?
Always from self defense
@Marshall Teach how about learning a subject before you say something
@@talerez83 it's never self defense, they bomb gaza on a daily, killing Arab Jews, Muslims and Christians in the west bank
@@nocapwithcaps3625 you are crazy
@@yurichtube1162 I am speaking facts, look at eye.on.palestine and Jewish voice for peace on instagram. The truth is there
brilliant, especially for your age. Keep up le bon travail
So according to this video, everyone who identifies as a philistine identifies as an invader
Well if Hamas identified as Palestinians that would be fitting
Did they not? Their whole point is palestinians fighting Israel to obliterate it and all its citizens for the freedom of "Palestine" @@laurenzb.1919
You're not going back far enough in history. This story began thousands of years ago. First off Palestinians are not Arabian, genetically Palestinians and Jews are related to each other through the Canaanites. It is like a giant family feud. The sad part is since the beginning of time all the wars that mankind have fought makes me picture mankind as a bunch of fleas fighting over the dog they live on.
Is there any historical material of those stories? Would love to read more about this subject. Also That would strongly prove the point.
I mean, if most of the jews would trace back their family trees then they would end up in judea
Yes., Its called historybooks.
@@ronnylarock13 which books ?
If you don’t have a good argument, mind as well just stay silent, eventually silence is gold.
@@rebilium4195 "Silence is gold" ... Worth thinking about when you ask "is there any historical material of those stories"...
Are you admitting you dont know the name of any historybooks or encyclopedias?
I.e Britannica?
@@ronnylarock13 This is a textbook example of how to NOT communicate in a positive and productive manner. The exact opposite of what Rudy is doing. Be more like him, don't be like that. It's counter productive.
יישר כוח! אני ישראלית שגרה בחו"ל ואני מופתעת לטובה על האנגלית הרהוטה שלך ...כול הכבוד הארת את עיני
נדמה שהוא ישראלי שגר בארה"ב, הרי יש לו סרטונים אחרים בערוץ בהם הוא משוחח עם אנשים ברחוב לגבי נושאים בקשר ליהודים, פלסטינים, וישראל. עושה עבודת קודש בלייצג אותנו.
השאלה אם שמעתם אותו מדבר בעברית...
@@emanuelyasheav1040 כן הוא מדבר עברית, ושירת בצהל
עברית במבטא אמריקאי.
What languace is this? :0
Spot On
What is ? This is all none sense . The problem was never jews against palestinians cuz there are jewish palestinains now a days who r 100 percent against the so called Israeli state.
@@jamilabidrabbu1198 Who are these "Jewish Palestinians" you speak of?
@@jamilabidrabbu1198 they are not Jewish Palestinians, we call them extreme left jews who are against zionism and themselves in favor of the Palestinians
@@jamilabidrabbu1198 there are Palestinians who believe what ruby says
Culprit: HADRIAN call the diabolic by name HADRIAN
And by the way Im not of the opinion that Jews should be kicked out of the area but Im against settlers from Europe and United States entering the land. Those immigrants shouldnt be allowed because 2.000 years ago they might have had a jewish (ethnic) grandmother from the area.
I think the solution is a common state which respect both peoples and with full equality and opputunity for all. Like Belgium were you have two different ethnic groups in the same country well functioning together.
Not a jewish state, not an arab state but a common state. But to be honest I dont think its gonna happen as long as the israeli government have all those religious extremists far right people who only want a jewish state and allows aliyah only for jews and not palestinians because it would cause a "demographic threat"
Any Muslims and Arabs are going nuts and crazy over this video, this man as a narrator is an Arab himself. (I’m assuming that he is a Muslim).
He's a jew
@@levizioni a zionist
@@levizioni illuminati puppet
Thank you for your explanation I never understood this so good .
i am happy the way you are proving that real talks among people can impact relation better
Wow, Rudy. You really helped me understand the history of the word "Palestine."
Never change Israeli jews are outsider, if I called Palestinian are included Muslim jew and Christians of native region of Palestine.
The only answer is for all Jews to return back to hashem,he is waiting for us to talk to him we don’t even want to spend one hour a day alone talking to him,he’s crying for us to be close to him.... that’s our ONLY ANSWER.....please return back to hashem let’s keep the Torah let’s talk to our father at least an hour a day...... it’s about time... ❤️
Mc E Yes!!!
@BVEmasTRUTH I never knew the victims of "apartheid" could have representitives in parliament, have full citizen rights and even be soldiers of this so called apartheid state. You are confused.
Thank you for your context! I wish this was taught in American schools. The American educational system is very anti-semite.
Rudy how do I support you! You’re awesome.
You forgot the Kingdom of the Nabaeteen which is current day Jordan and it’s borders spread to the Mideterinean. Your history is missing lots of facts Rudy. Jews lived in two Kingdoms, the Kingdom of Himyar in South Arabia, and the Kingdom of Khazaria somewhere near the Russian Empire. The ones in Judea at the times of the Romans were a tiny tribe whom of which converted forcibly to Christianity, just like their brethrens in Himyar.
So Philistines or not, it does not give Jews, converts from all around the world, to claim it as their ancestral land.
This is very Biased I must say. Also If I would use Native Americans as an example I know it's not very similar, however they lived here before Europeans invaded the continent. If Natives then decided to say well this is our country we should take it back...... it would be valid but this has happened in a lot of other countries and it's called LIFE. But thinking you have the rights to a land because your ancestors lived there thousands of years ago is very delusional. Btw i'm of Armenian decent so trust me, I know about genocide my people suffered too, so don't try to come at me with you are anti Semitic because I'm simply not. Trust me if i lived somewhere and someone came to kick me out of my house because their claims were well my ancestors were here long time ago and this is my land now even if this was your house for the last 20 years I will definitely not take the B.S and not leave my house, but Palestinians did not have a choice.... so instead of being so bias learn to live together and respect each others..... unity is what will solve this problem.
@@ananda5880 its not even their homeland
there was no ottoman palestine
There was
Very informative and factual video!
Genesis 32:28 - KJV
“And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.”
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
@@yansideabacoa6257 thank you for the detail, learning more from you
Th Roman general replaced the Kingdom of Judea with Palestina-Syria, over time it was Palestine. The Ottoman Empire gave a completely different name. The British Mandate used the term Palestine as a territory not a sovereign state. Jews and Arabs living there were referred to Palestinians. It was Arafat in 1965 that developed the terms, Palestine and Palestinian as an identity.
history is subjective...palestinians probably state to be the indigenous people...in reality "jews" and "palestinians" probably have the same ancestors and therfore have equal claim to the region...
Thank you for this clarification.
If someone had a historical right to some land. Does this give them the right to kill, displace, and demonize who is originally living on that land?
@Almog Zabari The fact is that they lived together for some time, before Gangs started vandalism acts. Nations occupy one another over history, but the removal of inhabitants was only on the agenda of the worst!
Very good thanks. Though there is more to the palastinian name and origins and usage, but in general you put so much on the table that it can't be faulted by an omission of nuances. Good work. The conclusion is how it should be.
What more is to the "palastinian" name?
@@joshuahalpern4426Why did you put quotes?
"once upon a time it was called Israel" - you are referring to time: 11century - 8century BEFORE CHRIST... SINCE 720 BC there was NO MORE Israel.
Since 1century it is a land of Palestine. Therefore these people (Palestinians) HAVE the right to live there. You can live there TOGETHER in peace, as Palestinians have been doing since Jews arrived in Palestinian land after the WW II, you do not need to exterminate them and selfishly take their land as claimed "historically yours" just because it was once called Israel in 11BC!
If that's so then why don't we check who lived in that land before 11BC and give this land to them Huh? Absolute nonse
@@bamssudardjo2572 Palestine is not only home for Muslims but also for Christians. As a country, it is existing since 1AD. So I guess those "islamic guys" have been residing there much longer than Izrael.
It was Roman emperor Hadrian who renamed Israel into Palestine after crushing a great Jewish revolt. The present Arab(so called Palestinian) had nothing to do with Palestine. Emperor Hadrian renamed it to crush the spirit of the Jews, thousands of them were deported from Judea. The Philistine were also called "Sea people", they invaded middle east in the late bronze age, they also invaded Egypt during the reign of Ramses III. Philistine were extinct race of people now
We went from the Roman Empire 2,000 years ago, to 1948. The math ain’t mathin’
This is how History actually works. Crazy right?
Great video!
Very intellegent said Rudy!
Respect from a Kurd
5:01 - Romans Destroyed the temple in 70AD, there is a lot of history before and after that. I understand this is not a history lesson but the land was not ever exclusively Jewish, just predominantly Jewish. There were always non jews on that land along side the Jewish population. As the land of historic Palestine is a vital land bridge between the three continents, there we a large number of empires that ruled over the land after the romans and before any Jewish empires. These empires did not rinse the land of all their inhabitants. So Its unfair to say that there was a small constant minority of Jews and that everyone else came from colonial migration. That's completely incorrect. Many of the core inhabitants of that land converted to Islam/Christianity. They did not all move in.
5:40 - The UN nations decided this after heavy lobbying by Zionists. The white house was bombarded by lobbyists and the US sent out telegrams threatening to cut foreign aid to countries who did not vote in favor of Resolution 181. The UN then voted in favor. Perhaps the vote should have been up to the Jews and Muslims and Christians living in Palestine at the time, but that's another story.
5:50 - I'm glad you chose not to debate this because that is a ridiculous argument. The arabs living in the region that was Trans Jordan received their independence. They weren't given anything, it was their land to begin with. The Arabs living in Historic Palestine got an offer for 45% of historic Palestine, The Jews were offered 55% of the land while they were only 1/3 the population after mass migration. The proposed Jewish state was going to have a MAJORITY arab population. The Palestinians were happy to share land with the Jews who lived there already, it was already the status quo and those jews have rights to the land as any arab living there did. But, they had an issue with those who illegally arrived after the Belfour declaration of 1917. No one wanted to "take" anything, however I can't say the same for zionists.
6:54 -Incorrect. There is a newspaper called "Falastin" which was founded in 1911 by Issa El-Issa. The Jewish newspaper like you mentioned, the Palestine Post (Jerusalem Post) was founded 1932. The land of the levant is typically referred to in arabic as "Balad al Sham" but the word Falastine in Arabic was still used. Conversations with my grandfather also indicate this, as he mentions that his grandfather (My great grandfather) would often boast that he traveled all over "Falastine." He would mostly bring Oranges from Jaffa to Jerusalem.
7:40 To put that intention behind using the word Palestinian is nonsense. No one can erase the history of the Israelites - Its in the Quran, and we have nothing to hide in history. No one disagrees that the Jews were historically in Palestine. We disagree with their perceived right to remove arab inhabitants from the land and claim ownership over it.
There was this idea that Arabs across the middle east are homogenous and can belong to any Arab land. Those Arabs with roots in historic Palestine are called Palestinian to specify the land they are attached to. There is no threat to Jewish history at all by arabs increasingly preferring to call themselves Palestinians.
The arabs and Jews and others living in historic Palestine before the Belfour declaration are the natives of the land. 1000X Moreso than anyone who just migrated in.
Overall, I agree that many people are uneducated about the Jewish history, and we are absolutely cousins - the descendants of Isaac and Ishmael. I don't want to strawman you, but the undertones of the Jewish people being the sole historic population continuously living in Palestine is just straight up incorrect.
according to an algebra i just made up, two competing nationalisms just cancel each other out. therefore the druze inherit the land. long live druzereal.
Palestine was never mentioned in the Quran. But Israel and the Jewish people were mentioned numerous amount of times. The state of Israel belongs to the the Jewish people
ShinigamiUzi how so?
@ShinigamiUzi how so?
Jerusalem is mentioned 700 times in the Jewish Torah. I think that says it ALL. Pallywood is biggest modern day LIE.
True
I'm glad I found this channel, very interesting and enlightening. As Africans, we've seen the effect of rapid arabization manifest itself on North East Africa. The indigenous people of the Megreb called the Imazingh and Nubians / Copts of Sudan and Egypt are still fighting to preserve their culture and identity to this day. I support Israel in your plight to preserve your culture and identity, Islam and arabization is toxic. However, I also respect your desire for peace with your neighbour's.
I'm moroccan arab roots not amazigh
Palestinians are cannanians semitic people
Name palestine come from greeks but indigenouse of palestine land callled the canaanians
What about the cananites . They lived there before the Israelites
A Palestinian is a person living in the region falsely called Palestine. Therefore, the Jews living there are also Palestinians. Before the establishment of Israel Jews were called Palestinian Jews and Arabs were called Palestinian Arabs. There was never a Palestinian nation and still isn’t, that’s why the museum for Palestinian history is empty.
This is sooooo interesting. Bless you for your content.
“Modern archaeology has identified 12 ancient inscriptions from Egyptian and Assyrian records recording likely cognates of Hebrew Pelesheth. The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c. 1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign, and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. Seven known Assyrian inscriptions refer to the region of "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c. 800 BCE through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. Neither the Egyptian nor the Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the entire area between Phoenicia and Egypt was in 5th century BCE Ancient Greece, Herodotus wrote of a "district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (Ancient Greek: Συρίη ἡ Παλαιστίνη καλεομένη) in The Histories, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley. Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition for the region in Meteorology, in which he included the Dead Sea. Later Greek writers such as Polemon and Pausanias also used the term to refer to the same region, which was followed by Roman writers such as Ovid, Tibullus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Dio Chrysostom, Statius, Plutarch as well as Roman Judean writers Philo of Alexandria and Josephus.”
This is the actual history. “Pelesheth” does NOT mean invaders. It comes from the Hebrew root word “palash” [פָלַשׁ] which means “act of mourning” or “to roll in”, and has been transliterated as roll and wallow, and there’s speculation it was applied in migratory terms. Additionally, modern palestinians are not exclusively descended from Philistines, but also Canaanites and Jews themselves.
Rudy the OFFICIAL propagandamachine of israhell. Don't be fooled by his calm appearance. He is an actor.