10 Chronographs at Once!?!?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 кві 2024
- Decided to have a little fun with some Garmin Xero C1 Chronographs and see how consistent they were across 10 different units all reading at the same time!
To purchase: arrowheadrifles.com/product/g...
#gramin #chronograph #longrangeprecision #longrangeshooting #precisionrifle - Фільми й анімація
We definitely dropped the ball not exploring the one unit a little more, but we had actually shot over all 10 on another occasion as well without issue. So I’m fairly certain it was picking up interference from a neighbor. With that many stacked together they did need to be placed just right. When we actually recorded the video that was like the third time that day we had reset the shot string and that was first time we had an issue with any of them.
I love mine and you are exactly correct. Plenty of times I wouldn't set up my chronograph because it was a pain. Now in just a few seconds I am ready to go.
Cool idea. Would be nice to get some feedback by Garmin. I would imagine that there is some interference with the Chronos so close together
Outstanding! Many thanks.
Thanks!
A great test, and not something I’ve ever seen the likes of before. It does confirm that sometimes chronographs, even the best, can produce inaccurate readings.
They are a true gamechanger. Interesting comparison. Given 1-2 fps generally...you can definitely live with that for load development and doping. Anyone wanna by ProChrono DGX?
lol, I sold my labradar as fast I could once I tried the garmin!
If i buy one it will be the on the right side second from the left....
lol
I thought this would be testing 10 _different_ chronographs against each other to see if everything matches or if some are way out. 10 of the same is like which M&M tastes best. :/
Quality Control test. 1 out 10 No horrible but still made in China
So 1 out of 10 are not within spec or a 10% failure rate. A quality control issue like that is not good. Thanks for doing the video as testing 10 of the same units hasn’t been done before.
10 is too small of a sample size to get an actual idea of what kind of variance you should expect on something that's produced in this quantity. That one "faulty" unit may actually be in a group of 1% that fall out of the acceptable range, and these guys just happened to get it.
They also should have swapped it to a different location to verify that the fault lies with that particular chrono, and not in some anomaly related to setup. Unlikely, I know, but that's part of the proper way to eliminate variables in empirical testing.
@@coltonholiday4872 True, but it’s very optimistic to assume this was just “one that slipped by”, and unless a dozen more people repeat the exact test with 120 completely different units, the current failure rate based upon the data is 10%.
@chrisgunsandguitars1403 correct. But the people testing the units, and likely seeing a significantly lower failure rate, is the manufacturer. Even at a 1% failure rate, out of spec units are still going to fall into consumer hands
@@coltonholiday4872 I’d like to see this test done with the new Lab Radar unit which is about the same size, does the same thing, costs the same, but has a metal case and made in North America instead of China. I’ve seen several side by side tests of the two and they were within 1-2fps of each other. Metal case is more durable IMO.
We definitely dropped the ball not exploring the one unit a little more, but we had actually shot over all 10 on another occasion as well without issue. So I’m fairly certain it was picking up interference from a neighbor. With that many stacked together they did need to be placed just right. When we actually recorded the video that was like the third time that day we had reset the shot string and that was first time we had an issue with any of them.
Sound like two little valley girls