Ya don’t worry the Orion capsule is recording everything and when it returns to earth Nasa will download all the pictures from the Orion capsule and release 4k high resolution images of the moons surfaces. Can’t do it live because upload and download speeds are too slow.
@@adamoshea2793 I hear skepticism in some texts. Because some people believing NASA never went to the Moon in late 60's, early 70's. But after this record breaking launch. I no longer have any doubts that the U.S.A., DID put men on the Moon. This is no CGR, it is real happening, have no doubt. They've made me a believer... Go NASA....
@@JupiterVortex because that was downloaded pictures read my above reply and you will understand why there aren’t as good as Apollo. High resolution images are coming in a couple of days.
and they also took the time and effort to translate every distance mentioned into miles for those who still can't work their mind around the metric system. showing the numbers in miles wasn't enough, they made the narrator say it too
I dont appreciate the low polygon count on the computer model (at 1 min 22 seconds) of the sphere that they used for the moom in this video. Terrible, looks like a computer model from 1996 🤣 2 out of 10 for effort on that.
@@embreis2257 The Brits know both systems so they use a hybrid of Feet, Metres, Yards and Miles by default (not KM) for distances. The Hybrid theme continues everywhere else, default temperature scale is Celsius but they also display Fahrenheit figures. Milimetres, Centimetres, Inches, Feet, Acres and Hectares for measuring. Why learn one when you can learn both?
I remember how the moon landing was shown in school... They filled our gym with chairs and had some of us sit on the floor.. Classes were pretty much done for that day.. The only thing we talked about was the lunar landing...
We still had a black and white television back then.There was mostly just a still picure on the screen with the sound playing of the astronauts talking, with the loud bleep after they finished talking.I watched that every morning before school, I always really loved space exploration, 50 years later I still do.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Applied Science. Know the difference readers ! If it can’t be proven by an experiment, it’s pseudoscience, like the Universe for example. Big Bang is a theory and the end state of the heliocentric model, correct? A science that does not uses science. Astrophysics, self-proclaimed science, adored belief system, programmed in our minds from birth and sustained all of our existences. If everything you are putting forward, comes from a single theory, everything perspiring from that theory is also theory, unless proven by an experiment. Theory is a belief system, not a science. It is hypothetical, thus, not reality. The top Head of the Field said Quote: “” No One, In My Field Uses The So Called Scientific Method”” Unquote. A self-proclaimed belief system calling itself a science that never uses science! It is a simple statement to make, as not a single “pseudoscience” statement, of astrophysics can be proven by “real science”. The only real science that Astrophysics ever uses is mathematics, ridiculous mathematics, accompanied by unbelievable stories and stupendous CGI images, fact. IT NEVER USES THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, THUS CANNOT BE CALLED A SCIENCE.A pseudo science is something that establishes the results and goes backwards with math, and theory to make things work, and suddenly makes it a fact? Like Copernicus’s complete heliocentric model for example. NASA Quote: Our only limit, is our imagination ! :-) Unquote. Einstein Quote: If it cannot be proven by an experiment it called belief UnQuote. He then continued Quote: But the earth orbits around the sun, Unquote. I see you laughing! You seriously think that Einstein did not know there was no scientific proof of the Heliocentric model, seriously! The man gave us messages, very solemnly, under the very scrutinizing eye of the Elite he was the instrument of. Just like Brian Cox, in the exact same position, mentioning in NASA’ s Vacuum facility that there is no “force” retaining the feather. If for one instant, you thought that Einstein did not know the fact that there is no scientific proof of the Universe, well you are a very, simple minded individual. Scratch Conscience🧠 Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done. REAL SCIENCE LOOKS LIKE THIS: And the “experimental report” looks like this: Scientifically, life as we know it, could not exist without oxygen! Correct? You would agree, that without oxygen, we could not be. Humans are 80% H20. So, plainly explained, NO OXYGEN = NO LIFE! You would agree. Scientifically, this experiment clearly disproves, gravity. Thus the same simple statement stands: NO GRAVITY = NO UNIVERSE. You cannot obtain Gravitational Attraction, without Gravity it is a very plain logical statement, IMPOSSIBLE Stands Proud & Tall. If gravity existed, the feather would fall at the same speed, no matter where it is on Earth. In or out of the vacuum chamber and vacuum ON or OFF. If we come back out of the Vacuum for an instant, it is Mass Density in opposition with Air Density. The more density your object offers, faster the fall, this because the air particles offer less resistance to your mass. Now, take that same feather, and drop it once deployed out of the Vacuum. Then, make a ball out of it with your hands, and drop it again in the same conditions as before, it now falls at a faster speed because it now offers more density to oppose the air particles. It’s weight is not augmented in any way, it is simply distributed with more Density. That is the PROOF THAT GRAVITY IS A MYTH. Gravity having been disproven by an Applied Science Experiment, under, “severe” Scientific conditions, NASA’s, own Vacuum Facility. LORAS, Logical, Observational, REVERSED Applied Science, brings the following Statement. I, therefore, declare the universe NUL AND VOID. I, DECLARE THAT THE UNIVERSE DOES NOT EXIST. Scratch Conscience🧠☯ Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done.
@@Markhope-e3z Go pedal your pseudoscience where someone might think your brilliant... As we have no sceintific proof you are I'm going to conclude your a NARSASSITIC EGOTISTICAL BLOW HARD THAT LIKES THE SOUND OF YOUR OWN BULL SHIT IDEAS... NOW SHUT THE "F" UP YOU GAVE ME A HEADACHE TRYING TO READ YOUR HIGHFOLUTINED PSEUDO THEORY... The evidence of all you just tried to disprove in your diatribe has been proved over and over again by great minds (obviously NOT YOURS) And your Annoucements of Shall it be SAID... Blah blah blah shows an arrogance of selfimportance not evident to anyone other than yourself.
2:37 We've only got one of those at the moment. Let's hope we grow up enough as a species, work together and not destroy it. One day if/when we achieve all of that, it will be exciting to see us inhabit other inhabitable planets out there in the universe.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
@@jordytea The reason you are saying this is because of your heavy conditioning and mentality. The best Christians are the ones who were not born Christians because they practice from the heart, and not from the mental conditioning from childhood. You could have easily been born a Muslim, a Hindu or some other religion. Better yet, stay away from religions, go deep within via meditation and yoga. Religion is a first step, but there will come a time when one reaches a certain level of mental maturity, where you start the path of spirituality and leave the shackles of religion behind. What Jesus taught 2000 years ago has unfortunately been distorted by the Church, a ruling power in the past to control people. When Jesus was 11, he went to India and paid respects to the 3 wise men /Gurus who came from India, studied the Vedas, and meditated to reach the higher states of consciousness. Even to this day, relics and pieces of the skull of one of Jesus' disciples, St. Thomas can be found in Chennai. Jesus is not the only son of God. All saints are sons and daughters of God, having attained the highest state of consciousness.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
@@GameplayTubeYT seriously you think that animation is real a small blue dot. NASA can't get there sizes right remember the moon is big from earth 🌎 the earth should be alot bigger from 🌙 moon. Wheres the stars disappear wow people swallow
@@jamesluke8439 Do you not understand how distance works? The distance between the Moon and the Earth is over 250,000 miles. Also, you can't see stars when you're on the daytime side of the moon for the same reason that you can't see stars on the daytime side of the Earth. The Sun's light overcomes the brightness of distant stars. It's simply too bright to see any stars.
Soon we’ll be able to mine the moon for its valuable cheese deposits. Then, we can finally end world hunger here on Earth. Just as the visionaries Wallace and Gromit dreamed we’d achieve someday.
Okay but then we’ll haft to deal with penguins evolving into intellect yet rebellious people Do you want a Penguin forcing you to rob a museum for its ancient diamonds? No didn’t think so
@@andycross5566 There’s different amounts of radiation on the moon, just like there’s different amounts everywhere else, and in later artemis missions, the astronauts will spend far longer on the moon than the Apollo astronauts, so any environmental factors that were unnoticeable then could cause major issues now
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Be nice to return to the Moon, I'll gladly be on of the first to volunteer for a possible Moon colony if and when it happens. I want to see stars outside the Earths surface, I heard stories from the Apollo missions that the stars on the dark side are the most spectacular.
Dark side of the moon isn't quite right. It's the far side of the moon. It gets sunlight but we only see one side because it's tidally locked in orbit with Earth it's rotation matches it's orbit. Yes it would be spectacular to see the stars in space. You just need to get out of the atmosphere and away from light pollution
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
With all this cautiousness and data being collected to help know how man will survive in such environment tells me no one ever went to the moon, no man !
@@gazpsychodrilla3278 The silly green laughing emoji definitely added weight to your comment. It didn't make you come across as a 5 year old at all, honest...
How exiting. I remember watching the first Moon landing now we are venturing towards a further Moon landing. I hope a laboratory can be created there. Superb BBC report. Wonderful.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
@@bmccameron7642 The first astronauts who traveled to the moon in ancient to play golf, are still alive today with barely any health problems other than drinking...so I think the radiation won't be a problem...unless it was all a lie 🤥
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
If they flew over old landing sights and have hi-res cameras onboard it would be very interesting to see that footage. Can you see any equipment on the surface?
Artemis I didn't show any remanence of the Apollo sites. The moon is still very large, the small lens and camera's onboard Artemis wouldn't be able to spot anything. It would be like spotting a car on Earth from the International Space Station with a phone camera. It's just not possible. However, there are satellite images of original the landing sites, showing blurry blobs of equipment and lunar vehicle tracks. Unfortunately these low quality images only fuel moon landing conspiracies. It takes a special satellite with a powerful lens, advanced camera and stabilization to lock on to the moon in orbit and get such high resolution images like we see on Google Maps, satellites like these are still pretty new to Earth and don't yet exist at the moon (that we know). That could change soon when NASA sends humans back, they may want to monitor the new landing site from orbit and this would require that special satellite camera to do so. They may use it to give us images of the Apollo sites. But according to NASA, all the leftover Apollo equipment, even the photo astronaut Charles Duke left in 1972, including the delicate flags are still there, exactly where they were decades ago, frozen in time. The moon landing conspiracy theorists should take note, the moon landing is internationally recognized as a fact. NASA even sent lunar samples for other countries to study. The Apollo missions were never disputed by any government agency in the world. But it would be nice to revisit the landing sites to put the conspiracies to rest. But these people are so looney, they would believe NASA faked it again or even sent Apollo equipment to the moon just to visit. These people will still believe, when humans return to the moon, that it was faked also 😆 Nothing will satisfy them.
1) The landing sites were in lunar night (unlit side) when the orbiter flew over them, and 2) It was 1,300 miles above the surface at the time. But please, feel free to snap me a pic of Spain from England at night. What?! You can't??!?!?!?!?! Well, I'm going to cry about it all over social media until I'm offered an explanation that I'll accept.
How wonderful. We have a 10 billion dollar telescope but its illegal to look at the earth. You can also see the moon better with a telescope bought at Wal-Mart.
I’m sorry I don’t believe we ever landed on the moon. You’re telling me we were driving vehicles on the moon and now it’s a big deal to get man on the moon again.
@@censoredopinions1458 you’re telling me you believe people landed on the moon and if so, how why would it be so difficult today if they accomplished driving vehicles on the moon logic lol
I’m sorry my opinion is that it was faked because we were in the race with the Russians during a crucial time in history, but I don’t believe we’ve ever landed on the moon. I am entitled to my opinion I shouldn’t be criticized because of it. But that’s the world we live in today if you don’t think like somebody else you’re ridiculed I live in Florida, so there’s not many of those people around
Yeah...you can shift the entire space budget times ten over to the welfare lay-abouts that the liberals always whine about and fifty years later you will just have five times more welfare cases anyway, the same whiny liberals and no space program.
@@JohnHazenhousenTBf they didn't specify which part the test was being taken place in, yes they're traveling past the moon (which we haven't done before) but they didn't specifically state the moon orbit was safe did they?
its a wide angle lense most likely. acting almost like a fish eye lense causing things in the centre to appear smaller than they would to the human eye
@@JohnHazenhousen Further out? didn't humans supposedly already go to the moon? But of course one of Nasa's chief engineers Don Petit said they apparently "lost the technology to go back" 🤣 You really have to be a "special" kind of person to believe this crap when the evidence against this space charade is mounting by the week and people waking up the lies every passing day. Why are you fickle and low functioning people so desperate to cling on to the globe?
@@LevelEarth2021 Yes, humans have already been to the Moon. But they didn't orbit it at 50,000 km, which is Orion's altitude at apolune. That's _much_ further out than any of the Apollo missions travelled. I am not desperate to cling onto anything. It's just that I believe the Earth is not flat and the Moon landings were not faked. I believe these things because all the evidence I've seen supports them and they make sense; while every single argument I've heard from the likes of you so far has been embarrassingly stupid. Every single one.
@@JohnHazenhousen Again, keep clinging. You have to deceive your own common senses and logic to believe something men in nasa suits tell you and pseudo scientists such as the ground underneath you is rotating up to 1000mph and that the horizon is constantly curving, bending water 🤣NONE OF WHICH WE SEE OR EXPERIENCE. So where is the evidence for the globe? You space/globe enthusiasts are getting more desperate by the day.
@@LevelEarth2021 Who is the one that is clinging? Your entire worldview is based on a series of poorly thought out talking points and conspiracy theories that you heard from morons and grifters on UA-cam. And your evidence is ‘it just feels that way’. Meanwhile, you don’t even have a working model for your flat earth, and can’t even explain a sunset/rise. This is why people like you are looked down on by society. You think you are one of the select few who are smart enough to have seen the truth while the rest of us are still blinded by the lies, and this makes you feel superior for once in your life. The reality is that you’re a dunce. You were failed by your education system and do not understand the basics of the world you live in; and your conspiracy theories give you someone to blame. You can tell yourself ‘this makes no sense to me not because I’m stupid, but because it’s all lies!’ And nobody will ever be able to convince you otherwise because that would mean giving up that illusion of superiority and admitting that you were taken in by *the* stupidest idea of the 19th century.
Applied Science. Know the difference readers ! If it can’t be proven by an experiment, it’s pseudoscience, like the Universe for example. Big Bang is a theory and the end state of the heliocentric model, correct? A science that does not uses science. Astrophysics, self-proclaimed science, adored belief system, programmed in our minds from birth and sustained all of our existences. If everything you are putting forward, comes from a single theory, everything perspiring from that theory is also theory, unless proven by an experiment. Theory is a belief system, not a science. It is hypothetical, thus, not reality. The top Head of the Field said Quote: “” No One, In My Field Uses The So Called Scientific Method”” Unquote. A self-proclaimed belief system calling itself a science that never uses science! It is a simple statement to make, as not a single “pseudoscience” statement, of astrophysics can be proven by “real science”. The only real science that Astrophysics ever uses is mathematics, ridiculous mathematics, accompanied by unbelievable stories and stupendous CGI images, fact. IT NEVER USES THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, THUS CANNOT BE CALLED A SCIENCE.A pseudo science is something that establishes the results and goes backwards with math, and theory to make things work, and suddenly makes it a fact? Like Copernicus’s complete heliocentric model for example. NASA Quote: Our only limit, is our imagination ! :-) Unquote. Einstein Quote: If it cannot be proven by an experiment it called belief UnQuote. He then continued Quote: But the earth orbits around the sun, Unquote. I see you laughing! You seriously think that Einstein did not know there was no scientific proof of the Heliocentric model, seriously! The man gave us messages, very solemnly, under the very scrutinizing eye of the Elite he was the instrument of. Just like Brian Cox, in the exact same position, mentioning in NASA’ s Vacuum facility that there is no “force” retaining the feather. If for one instant, you thought that Einstein did not know the fact that there is no scientific proof of the Universe, well you are a very, simple minded individual. Scratch Conscience🧠 Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done. REAL SCIENCE LOOKS LIKE THIS: And the “experimental report” looks like this: Scientifically, life as we know it, could not exist without oxygen! Correct? You would agree, that without oxygen, we could not be. Humans are 80% H20. So, plainly explained, NO OXYGEN = NO LIFE! You would agree. Scientifically, this experiment clearly disproves, gravity. Thus the same simple statement stands: NO GRAVITY = NO UNIVERSE. You cannot obtain Gravitational Attraction, without Gravity it is a very plain logical statement, IMPOSSIBLE Stands Proud & Tall. If gravity existed, the feather would fall at the same speed, no matter where it is on Earth. In or out of the vacuum chamber and vacuum ON or OFF. If we come back out of the Vacuum for an instant, it is Mass Density in opposition with Air Density. The more density your object offers, faster the fall, this because the air particles offer less resistance to your mass. Now, take that same feather, and drop it once deployed out of the Vacuum. Then, make a ball out of it with your hands, and drop it again in the same conditions as before, it now falls at a faster speed because it now offers more density to oppose the air particles. It’s weight is not augmented in any way, it is simply distributed with more Density. That is the PROOF THAT GRAVITY IS A MYTH. Gravity having been disproven by an Applied Science Experiment, under, “severe” Scientific conditions, NASA’s, own Vacuum Facility. LORAS, Logical, Observational, REVERSED Applied Science, brings the following Statement. I, therefore, declare the universe NUL AND VOID. I, DECLARE THAT THE UNIVERSE DOES NOT EXIST. Scratch Conscience🧠☯ Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done.
On your first visit you dont care about radiation,but now you bloody care and want to check for radiation first and human expedition comes after? Is this admitting that first visit was fake?
so you would go up in starship right now? how many blew up?. this is the first launch of this rocket, a million things could go wrong. How many times have we sent humans into orbit, yet starship still has not done that. so you would really just hop on this untested rocket and go around the moon?
Because now it's economically viable, and with the possibility of mining helium 3. In the cold war, this adventure was nothing but a very expensive ideology conflict to beat the Soviets, that were ahead on the space race and propaganda, to show which ideology is the best. At the time of Apolo 13, people were already uninterested, it got more attention because it almost failed. Congress was already calling for a downgrade of the program.
I thought man had gone to the moon so se would already know ... so am unmanned flight to see how it would effect people clearly states we've never been before !!!!
Wow ! The Nevada desert is almost perfectly round, just like the bottom of a well used pan. The goddess Artemis is so clever! The CGI is jaw droppingly good.👍 Thanks BBC very convincing.
Why do they need to do an unmanned flyby followed by a manned flyby before we can dare risk landing on the surface? I thought we already landed on the moon like nobody's business 60 years ago.
Because we value human life on an essentially experimental spacecraft? If you recall, in our race to get to the moon in the 60s we lost 3 astronauts on the ground in a fire and almost lost another 3 on apollo 13. So ya I think nasa is gonna be playing it safe this goaround.
As with anything that has never been done before, we need to take baby steps. We have never landed on the moon before, so we need to take baby steps until we are able to do it for the first time.
@@JohnHazenhousen I can see how my comment might seem that way if you have no idea what you're talking about and haven't bothered to look into it at all.
That's because we have never been and cannot "go to the moon" since it is not a physical mass of rock in an impossible space vacuum that defies the laws of physics and logic. Same repeated lies for a new generation, this is the biggest satanic lie being played on humanity of all time and a great time of tribulation to expose peoples true faith.
Feel free to provide the evidence for your positive claim at any time. I wouldn't want anyone to think you're making up stories and spouting them as fact...
The earth is 4x bigger than the moon it should look much larger than that from the moon. In comparison of how the moon looks like from earth! It should look approximately 4x bigger than the moon looks like from earth using simple math,correct?
@@spencerlievens what a sausage smoker. I'm talking from the perspective of how the moon looks like from earth and its size in comparison. Like a reverse perspective! No, cause you don't think at all because your to busy "smoking sausage ".
But you're not viewing the earth as an observer on the surface of the moon. You're seeing the moon and earth while in orbit of the moon. You can clearly see the curve of the moon in this picture. Also how would you decide how large the earth is in the "sky' compared to the "moon" from this picture?
Depends on the camera lens for one. Also look at the moon when it's low it's larger do to atmospheric distortion. No or very little atmosphere on the moon.
Kinda glossed over the splashdown as if it was a done deal. It's arguably one of the most important tests that those mannequins will face. We already know about the radiation levels and g-forces involved in lunar orbit.
@@dansv1 They've tested every system and every component. Artemis I is a full-scale integrated test. It has to return to Earth on the right trajectory, the capsule has to separate successfully, the heat shield has to do its job and _then_ there's the splashdown. I have little doubt that it will be successful but it's not a foregone conclusion. After the launch it's probably the riskiest part of the mission.
"Most of these sensors are going to be getting an idea if the environment is going to be safe " ? Haven't we been there before ? Buz, Neil ? They done ok as did the other astronaut's who went there.
@ The Fezz You point out quite a blatant anomaly. If Neil & Buzz landed there in the 60's, and with a number of subsequent return visits by others in the 70's, during which the main craft must have been orbiting the moon (with the astronaut on board that was not part of the landing party for each mission), it is difficult to comprehend what the purpose of the mission (reported on by the BBC) really is.
@@dutchschultz3076 Yeah, it does seem like a backward step compared to the 50 year old missions. Could they not just strap it on the side again? You would think that they never went!
@@IvanMectin how do you know whether or not they plan on bringing rovers to the moon? Artemis 1 is not manned and is not landing, Artemis 3 will have an entirely new spacecraft used for landing, one that is more than capable of holding several rovers inside of it
Show us the u.s flag where Armstrong allegedly landed. You have the camera of this satellite and hubble and james webb at your disposal. There was no moon landing.
China is building its space station, it won't be long before they use their cameras to scan the moon and debunk the moon landing hoax. That will be a great embarrassment to the u.s and nasa.
The reason they have these stations is not for scientific reasons. That's how they delude the public and atheists. Your leaders are pagans who worship shayateen (jinn devils). And their gods I.e. the jinn devils have stations in the heavens where they eavesdrop on the conversation of the angels stationed in our heaven. The angels receive news from Allah relating to their world or our world. If the news relates to our world, they talk about it, saying: such and such would happen. The jinn devils work day and night trying to capture anything from that conversation, then they fly down to earth and deceive men into taking them as gods who know the future events. How many nations did not believe in that? So I think that instead of flying down to the Kuhhan (oracles) lest the shooting stars hit them like in the old days, then the pagan worshippers of the jinn set up these space stations, acting as quicker way for the devils to transmit the words that they eavesdropped on. Nasa was founded by satanists, Jack Parsons who dreamet that the Dajjal came to him. Allah سبحانه وتعالى said, أَمْ عِندَهُمُ الْغَيْبُ فَهُمْ يَكْتُبُونَ Or is the Ghaib (the Unseen) with them, so that they can write it down? [Al-Qalam 68:47] أَمْ عِندَهُمْ خَزَائِنُ رَبِّكَ أَمْ هُمُ الْمُصَيْطِرُونَ Or are with them the treasures of your Lord? Or are they the tyrants with the authority to do as they like? أَمْ لَهُمْ سُلَّمٌ يَسْتَمِعُونَ فِيهِ ۖ فَلْيَأْتِ مُسْتَمِعُهُم بِسُلْطَانٍ مُّبِينٍ Or have they a stairway (to heaven), by means of which they listen (to the talks of the angels)? Then let their listener produce some manifest proof. [At-Tur 52:37-38]
For the same reason, here on earth, high frequency antennas need to be installed at shorter distance and at quantity, the faster the data stream the weaker the range will become. This is the quick and compressed version streamed at a lower quality, I'm sure they will be able to transmit better with time.
@@1newme425 The data is transmitted in binary form, 1 and 0, positive signal and the absence of it. The shorter the waves, the more faster they alternate between "1" and "0" in the same amount of time, and as I said the range gets shorter. With direct laser communication you would need a array of satellites in both orbits, one backing up the other while it goes beyond sight or optimal signal. Without that they have to communicate through wide frequencies.
A waste of money and a waste of time can I see something different. Something that gonna blow my mind please no rocks floating around in space and CGI.
Health and safety is taken much more seriously these days. You can't just send astronauts up in an untested spacecraft, so they did a dress rehearsal first.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
@@skysurfer5cva Exactly. And assuming that Artemis I meets all of its objectives and splashdown in the Pacific goes according to plan, paving the way for Artemis II being the first crewed flight, it will arguably be more successful than Apollo 4, 5 and 6 combined. _That_ shows what faith NASA has in its engineers. One perfect dress rehearsal, rather than the three less-than-perfect test flights that were required before Apollo 7.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Holy shit... That image resolution is just so amazing
funny!!
Ya don’t worry the Orion capsule is recording everything and when it returns to earth Nasa will download all the pictures from the Orion capsule and release 4k high resolution images of the moons surfaces.
Can’t do it live because upload and download speeds are too slow.
Considering how good the cameras they used on Apollo several decades ago, the image that was recently shown isn’t that god
@@adamoshea2793 I hear skepticism in some texts. Because some people believing NASA never went to the Moon in late 60's, early 70's. But after this record breaking launch. I no longer have any doubts that the U.S.A., DID put men on the Moon. This is no CGR, it is real happening, have no doubt. They've made me a believer... Go NASA....
@@JupiterVortex because that was downloaded pictures read my above reply and you will understand why there aren’t as good as Apollo.
High resolution images are coming in a couple of days.
I appreciate the BBC team for adding in animations of the orbits for those who aren't familiar with how orbital mechanics works
and they also took the time and effort to translate every distance mentioned into miles for those who still can't work their mind around the metric system. showing the numbers in miles wasn't enough, they made the narrator say it too
I dont appreciate the low polygon count on the computer model (at 1 min 22 seconds) of the sphere that they used for the moom in this video. Terrible, looks like a computer model from 1996 🤣 2 out of 10 for effort on that.
Not everyone has played KSP
its the most popular news channel on earth, this is excpected
@@embreis2257 The Brits know both systems so they use a hybrid of Feet, Metres, Yards and Miles by default (not KM) for distances. The Hybrid theme continues everywhere else, default temperature scale is Celsius but they also display Fahrenheit figures. Milimetres, Centimetres, Inches, Feet, Acres and Hectares for measuring. Why learn one when you can learn both?
I remember how the moon landing was shown in school... They filled our gym with chairs and had some of us sit on the floor.. Classes were pretty much done for that day.. The only thing we talked about was the lunar landing...
We still had a black and white television back then.There was mostly just a still picure on the screen with the sound playing of the astronauts talking, with the loud bleep after they finished talking.I watched that every morning before school, I always really loved space exploration, 50 years later I still do.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Applied Science. Know the difference readers !
If it can’t be proven by an experiment, it’s pseudoscience, like the Universe for example. Big Bang is a theory and the end state of the heliocentric model, correct? A science that does not uses science. Astrophysics, self-proclaimed science, adored belief system, programmed in our minds from birth and sustained all of our existences. If everything you are putting forward, comes from a single theory, everything perspiring from that theory is also theory, unless proven by an experiment. Theory is a belief system, not a science. It is hypothetical, thus, not reality. The top Head of the Field said Quote: “” No One, In My Field Uses The So Called Scientific Method”” Unquote. A self-proclaimed belief system calling itself a science that never uses science! It is a simple statement to make, as not a single “pseudoscience” statement, of astrophysics can be proven by “real science”. The only real science that Astrophysics ever uses is mathematics, ridiculous mathematics, accompanied by unbelievable stories and stupendous CGI images, fact. IT NEVER USES THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, THUS CANNOT BE CALLED A SCIENCE.A pseudo science is something that establishes the results and goes backwards with math, and theory to make things work, and suddenly makes it a fact? Like Copernicus’s complete heliocentric model for example. NASA Quote: Our only limit, is our imagination ! :-) Unquote. Einstein Quote: If it cannot be proven by an experiment it called belief UnQuote. He then continued Quote: But the earth orbits around the sun, Unquote. I see you laughing! You seriously think that Einstein did not know there was no scientific proof of the Heliocentric model, seriously! The man gave us messages, very solemnly, under the very scrutinizing eye of the Elite he was the instrument of. Just like Brian Cox, in the exact same position, mentioning in NASA’ s Vacuum facility that there is no “force” retaining the feather. If for one instant, you thought that Einstein did not know the fact that there is no scientific proof of the Universe, well you are a very, simple minded individual.
Scratch Conscience🧠
Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done.
REAL SCIENCE LOOKS LIKE THIS:
And the “experimental report” looks like this: Scientifically, life as we know it, could not exist without oxygen! Correct? You would agree, that without oxygen, we could not be. Humans are 80% H20. So, plainly explained, NO OXYGEN = NO LIFE! You would agree.
Scientifically, this experiment clearly disproves, gravity. Thus the same simple statement stands: NO GRAVITY = NO UNIVERSE. You cannot obtain Gravitational Attraction, without Gravity it is a very plain logical statement, IMPOSSIBLE Stands Proud & Tall. If gravity existed, the feather would fall at the same speed, no matter where it is on Earth. In or out of the vacuum chamber and vacuum ON or OFF. If we come back out of the Vacuum for an instant, it is Mass Density in opposition with Air Density. The more density your object offers, faster the fall, this because the air particles offer less resistance to your mass. Now, take that same feather, and drop it once deployed out of the Vacuum. Then, make a ball out of it with your hands, and drop it again in the same conditions as before, it now falls at a faster speed because it now offers more density to oppose the air particles. It’s weight is not augmented in any way, it is simply distributed with more Density. That is the PROOF THAT GRAVITY IS A MYTH.
Gravity having been disproven by an Applied Science Experiment, under, “severe” Scientific conditions, NASA’s, own Vacuum Facility. LORAS, Logical, Observational, REVERSED Applied Science, brings the following Statement.
I, therefore, declare the universe NUL AND VOID.
I, DECLARE THAT THE UNIVERSE DOES NOT EXIST.
Scratch Conscience🧠☯
Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done.
@@Markhope-e3z Go pedal your pseudoscience where someone might think your brilliant... As we have no sceintific proof you are I'm going to conclude your a NARSASSITIC EGOTISTICAL BLOW HARD THAT LIKES THE SOUND OF YOUR OWN BULL SHIT IDEAS...
NOW SHUT THE "F" UP YOU GAVE ME A HEADACHE TRYING TO READ YOUR HIGHFOLUTINED PSEUDO THEORY...
The evidence of all you just tried to disprove in your diatribe has been proved over and over again by great minds (obviously NOT YOURS)
And your Annoucements of Shall it be SAID... Blah blah blah shows an arrogance of selfimportance not evident to anyone other than yourself.
You were programmed from cradle to grave.
2:37 We've only got one of those at the moment. Let's hope we grow up enough as a species, work together and not destroy it. One day if/when we achieve all of that, it will be exciting to see us inhabit other inhabitable planets out there in the universe.
Fully agree with you, man! :)
“Zebulon Scoville is a totally human name. They’ll never suspect a thing…”
-Alien working at NASA, trying to get home
Just think that's us on that little blue dot!!! Makes you think about life on other planets for sure!! So cool
Makes you think about life on our own planet and how we are trashing the joint. Little life or none at all on most of the other planets though.
A photo of everyone in the world all at once. I wish I'd put a smart shirt on
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
@@jordytea The reason you are saying this is because of your heavy conditioning and mentality. The best Christians are the ones who were not born Christians because they practice from the heart, and not from the mental conditioning from childhood. You could have easily been born a Muslim, a Hindu or some other religion. Better yet, stay away from religions, go deep within via meditation and yoga. Religion is a first step, but there will come a time when one reaches a certain level of mental maturity, where you start the path of spirituality and leave the shackles of religion behind. What Jesus taught 2000 years ago has unfortunately been distorted by the Church, a ruling power in the past to control people. When Jesus was 11, he went to India and paid respects to the 3 wise men /Gurus who came from India, studied the Vedas, and meditated to reach the higher states of consciousness. Even to this day, relics and pieces of the skull of one of Jesus' disciples, St. Thomas can be found in Chennai. Jesus is not the only son of God. All saints are sons and daughters of God, having attained the highest state of consciousness.
That little blue dot shouldn't be so small if the moon is this close in the picture.
See how small is the world. Let love each other.
Having trouble finding those dotted lines (international borders). Exactly!
"A pale blue dot" amazing
While Flat earthers called it "A pale blue Flat" Lmao 😅
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
@@GameplayTubeYT seriously you think that animation is real a small blue dot. NASA can't get there sizes right remember the moon is big from earth 🌎 the earth should be alot bigger from 🌙 moon. Wheres the stars disappear wow people swallow
@@jordytea The fact that people like you still follow religion in the 21st century is very concerning.
@@jamesluke8439 Do you not understand how distance works? The distance between the Moon and the Earth is over 250,000 miles. Also, you can't see stars when you're on the daytime side of the moon for the same reason that you can't see stars on the daytime side of the Earth. The Sun's light overcomes the brightness of distant stars. It's simply too bright to see any stars.
so glad they didn't call it the DARK side of the moon
Soon we’ll be able to mine the moon for its valuable cheese deposits. Then, we can finally end world hunger here on Earth. Just as the visionaries Wallace and Gromit dreamed we’d achieve someday.
Okay but then we’ll haft to deal with penguins evolving into intellect yet rebellious people
Do you want a Penguin forcing you to rob a museum for its ancient diamonds?
No didn’t think so
Well. It's more believable than sending a bunch of satanic masons in a tin can firework to the astral realm of the dead...
Someday I wanna jump on moon and it can be possible damn
There couldn't be a more scary thing than flying through space, knowing that you could possibly be lost out there. With absolutely no way back home.
For some, certainly
Oh yes there could be. "Possibly" isn't a sure thing, so I'd rather be shot at the moon than stabbed or shot or anything
Being underwater I'd find scarier
@@ztaylor82 Dying in less than 5 minutes instead of endlessly flying through space till you actually starve to death? Yes, I totally agree with you...
No one is on the silly rocket.
We've come a long way!
That's awesome by all means! Would like to see more footage of Moon surface, though!
It's coming.....won't be long bro till mankind is back there and taking our own photos 💙☮️💜
Not really.
@@Mu5096rdgh black cat profile picture.....hmmm.....I sense a witch🙊
@@chrisprice4658 Thanks, man! Thumbs up!
its classified
Very nice information love USA and NASA from Ahiyapur Muzaffarpur Bihar India
I can't believe they are already remaking this. Kubrick is spinning in his grave
Yup, and Armstrong is is giving you the finger.
Only Kubrick done a better job. Today's weather; overcast with a down pour of gullibility.
lol that animation of ur reporter standing on nothing didnt help at all +1 for effort tho 😂
And checking for radiation not needed because already humans landed on the moon not what a joke
@@andycross5566 There’s different amounts of radiation on the moon, just like there’s different amounts everywhere else, and in later artemis missions, the astronauts will spend far longer on the moon than the Apollo astronauts, so any environmental factors that were unnoticeable then could cause major issues now
lol the starless Fantasy
Once again, thank you cameraman for this and also witnessing the Big Bang 800 trillion years ago.
No problem 😉
@@channel_currently_unavailable lol
The big bang was 13 billion years ago .. just to pick hairs
Looking forward to watching the mannequin's first steps on the moon.
This is a lunar rendezvous and orbital mission only.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Thanks for the computer generated photos
Present your evidence please :-)
Good luck in kindergarten 🤣
Be nice to return to the Moon, I'll gladly be on of the first to volunteer for a possible Moon colony if and when it happens. I want to see stars outside the Earths surface, I heard stories from the Apollo missions that the stars on the dark side are the most spectacular.
You can see the stars behind the Moon as we are constantly moving including the Moon.
Dark side of the moon isn't quite right. It's the far side of the moon. It gets sunlight but we only see one side because it's tidally locked in orbit with Earth it's rotation matches it's orbit.
Yes it would be spectacular to see the stars in space. You just need to get out of the atmosphere and away from light pollution
So cool
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
With all this cautiousness and data being collected to help know how man will survive in such environment tells me no one ever went to the moon, no man !
Thankfully, you are not the arbiter of what is and isn't real.
@@ReValveiT_01 sadly you cannot tell the difference anyways
@@gazpsychodrilla3278 The silly green laughing emoji definitely added weight to your comment. It didn't make you come across as a 5 year old at all, honest...
@@ReValveiT_01 you are just jealous, that you have not got one, just the standard.
Cope harder.
@@gazpsychodrilla3278 Grow up.
How exiting. I remember watching the first Moon landing now we are venturing towards a further Moon landing. I hope a laboratory can be created there. Superb BBC report. Wonderful.
exciting...surprised you didn't edit the mistake...
Amazing to see. Cannot wait to see people on the moon again.
Ur so dooober u believe anything
I bet u took the vaccine
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Again..🤣🤣🤣
Again?? It's almost an open secret that we have never been. Replay 2:02 and consider what's being stated from NASA here.
@@bmccameron7642 The first astronauts who traveled to the moon in ancient to play golf, are still alive today with barely any health problems other than drinking...so I think the radiation won't be a problem...unless it was all a lie 🤥
Hang on! Didn't we do/see all that in high-res colour 53 years ago? And six times, as I recall, with the exception of No.13.
We are not down yet 🇺🇸
Nasa's Artemis spacecraft sends back images of Moon and Earth - BBC News 22.11.22 1233pm excellent!! we all love a bit of space travel...
Artemis 1 MISSION, Orion SPACECRAFT. It's really not that hard to get it right.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
This time is for real 😃
Better CGI nowadays Buzz.
@@theshamanarchist5441 came here to giggle at Flat Earthers but at least I found a Moon-landing-is-faker :)
We're just a 'pale blue dot'! ~ Amazing!
(Wed 30 Nov 2022 13h57)
If they flew over old landing sights and have hi-res cameras onboard it would be very interesting to see that footage. Can you see any equipment on the surface?
Artemis I didn't show any remanence of the Apollo sites. The moon is still very large, the small lens and camera's onboard Artemis wouldn't be able to spot anything. It would be like spotting a car on Earth from the International Space Station with a phone camera. It's just not possible.
However, there are satellite images of original the landing sites, showing blurry blobs of equipment and lunar vehicle tracks. Unfortunately these low quality images only fuel moon landing conspiracies. It takes a special satellite with a powerful lens, advanced camera and stabilization to lock on to the moon in orbit and get such high resolution images like we see on Google Maps, satellites like these are still pretty new to Earth and don't yet exist at the moon (that we know). That could change soon when NASA sends humans back, they may want to monitor the new landing site from orbit and this would require that special satellite camera to do so. They may use it to give us images of the Apollo sites. But according to NASA, all the leftover Apollo equipment, even the photo astronaut Charles Duke left in 1972, including the delicate flags are still there, exactly where they were decades ago, frozen in time.
The moon landing conspiracy theorists should take note, the moon landing is internationally recognized as a fact. NASA even sent lunar samples for other countries to study. The Apollo missions were never disputed by any government agency in the world. But it would be nice to revisit the landing sites to put the conspiracies to rest. But these people are so looney, they would believe NASA faked it again or even sent Apollo equipment to the moon just to visit. These people will still believe, when humans return to the moon, that it was faked also 😆 Nothing will satisfy them.
@@exohio Certainly not that drivel. 🥱💤
@@IvanMectin It's all about your approval?
1) The landing sites were in lunar night (unlit side) when the orbiter flew over them, and 2) It was 1,300 miles above the surface at the time.
But please, feel free to snap me a pic of Spain from England at night. What?! You can't??!?!?!?!?! Well, I'm going to cry about it all over social media until I'm offered an explanation that I'll accept.
@@RideAcrossTheRiver No, it's about proof!
Ευχαριστούμε!!!Ο Χριστός μαζί μας!!!+++☦️🛐💒👏🙋🌹🤍🇬🇷👍
Amazing moon and earth for me
Manikins with sensors? its like we've never been before??
Ya . Because the information we got From The Last Time We Went To The Moon. must have gotten lost or something. Right (wink ,wink)
Something about getting the news with a British accent is just better
Just shows how insignificant we are in the universe
We? Speak for yourself, puny Earth creature.
You are.
@@theshamanarchist5441 what have you done that’s so significant then lol
@@technoquetz126 I trolled some scientism nerd cult members on jewtube, for a start....
How wonderful. We have a 10 billion dollar telescope but its illegal to look at the earth. You can also see the moon better with a telescope bought at Wal-Mart.
I’m sorry I don’t believe we ever landed on the moon. You’re telling me we were driving vehicles on the moon and now it’s a big deal to get man on the moon again.
Ignorance is a choice.
@@coffeeandbytes9854 you’re right and we see your choice
@@censoredopinions1458 you’re telling me you believe people landed on the moon and if so, how why would it be so difficult today if they accomplished driving vehicles on the moon logic lol
I’m sorry my opinion is that it was faked because we were in the race with the Russians during a crucial time in history, but I don’t believe we’ve ever landed on the moon. I am entitled to my opinion I shouldn’t be criticized because of it. But that’s the world we live in today if you don’t think like somebody else you’re ridiculed I live in Florida, so there’s not many of those people around
so beautiful
With a spacecraft like that, the moon was always going to be Artemis. 🚀 🌙
:D
Golden 😮
So has humanity learned anything new?
What does that have to do with the English church
@@danesha4705 The same amount as marmalade.
@@John_Bradbury producing more humans? On this planet?
@@danesha4705 No thank you.
Yeah...you can shift the entire space budget times ten over to the welfare lay-abouts that the liberals always whine about and fifty years later you will just have five times more welfare cases anyway, the same whiny liberals and no space program.
back in the day, we had test and fighter pilots that actually flew a space ship.
Apollos 4 through 7 were unmanned, most astronauts are still fighter pilots, so idk what your point is
Amazing view. Cheers and peace fr Madeira island.
Note:- At 2:00 this NASA empolyee says the suit is going to have lots of sensors to see whether or not this environment is going to be "OK for people"
If you had actually been paying attention to the video, you would probably have picked up on a key piece of context that you clearly missed.
@@JohnHazenhousenTBf they didn't specify which part the test was being taken place in, yes they're traveling past the moon (which we haven't done before) but they didn't specifically state the moon orbit was safe did they?
omg! wow! amazing!
Dude ur brain washed
How many COVID jabs u take
Why does earth look soo small from the moon, but the moon looks soo big from earth :S
its a wide angle lense most likely. acting almost like a fish eye lense causing things in the centre to appear smaller than they would to the human eye
Take a photograph of the moon with your camera and compare it to how big your eye sees it in real time. Very simple
finaly man will really reach the moon. this is the real time. yay.
If we've already been to the moon, why are they treating this test like it's the first time???
Because this is a brand new spacecraft and it’s going further out than any other spacecraft designed to carry humans has ever been.
@@JohnHazenhousen Further out? didn't humans supposedly already go to the moon? But of course one of Nasa's chief engineers Don Petit said they apparently "lost the technology to go back" 🤣 You really have to be a "special" kind of person to believe this crap when the evidence against this space charade is mounting by the week and people waking up the lies every passing day. Why are you fickle and low functioning people so desperate to cling on to the globe?
@@LevelEarth2021 Yes, humans have already been to the Moon. But they didn't orbit it at 50,000 km, which is Orion's altitude at apolune. That's _much_ further out than any of the Apollo missions travelled.
I am not desperate to cling onto anything. It's just that I believe the Earth is not flat and the Moon landings were not faked. I believe these things because all the evidence I've seen supports them and they make sense; while every single argument I've heard from the likes of you so far has been embarrassingly stupid. Every single one.
@@JohnHazenhousen Again, keep clinging. You have to deceive your own common senses and logic to believe something men in nasa suits tell you and pseudo scientists such as the ground underneath you is rotating up to 1000mph and that the horizon is constantly curving, bending water 🤣NONE OF WHICH WE SEE OR EXPERIENCE. So where is the evidence for the globe? You space/globe enthusiasts are getting more desperate by the day.
@@LevelEarth2021 Who is the one that is clinging? Your entire worldview is based on a series of poorly thought out talking points and conspiracy theories that you heard from morons and grifters on UA-cam. And your evidence is ‘it just feels that way’. Meanwhile, you don’t even have a working model for your flat earth, and can’t even explain a sunset/rise.
This is why people like you are looked down on by society. You think you are one of the select few who are smart enough to have seen the truth while the rest of us are still blinded by the lies, and this makes you feel superior for once in your life. The reality is that you’re a dunce. You were failed by your education system and do not understand the basics of the world you live in; and your conspiracy theories give you someone to blame. You can tell yourself ‘this makes no sense to me not because I’m stupid, but because it’s all lies!’ And nobody will ever be able to convince you otherwise because that would mean giving up that illusion of superiority and admitting that you were taken in by *the* stupidest idea of the 19th century.
Wonderful amazing great 👍👌👏👏🇵🇰
How fragile our gravitational relationship with the moon appears here
Applied Science. Know the difference readers !
If it can’t be proven by an experiment, it’s pseudoscience, like the Universe for example. Big Bang is a theory and the end state of the heliocentric model, correct? A science that does not uses science. Astrophysics, self-proclaimed science, adored belief system, programmed in our minds from birth and sustained all of our existences. If everything you are putting forward, comes from a single theory, everything perspiring from that theory is also theory, unless proven by an experiment. Theory is a belief system, not a science. It is hypothetical, thus, not reality. The top Head of the Field said Quote: “” No One, In My Field Uses The So Called Scientific Method”” Unquote. A self-proclaimed belief system calling itself a science that never uses science! It is a simple statement to make, as not a single “pseudoscience” statement, of astrophysics can be proven by “real science”. The only real science that Astrophysics ever uses is mathematics, ridiculous mathematics, accompanied by unbelievable stories and stupendous CGI images, fact. IT NEVER USES THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, THUS CANNOT BE CALLED A SCIENCE.A pseudo science is something that establishes the results and goes backwards with math, and theory to make things work, and suddenly makes it a fact? Like Copernicus’s complete heliocentric model for example. NASA Quote: Our only limit, is our imagination ! :-) Unquote. Einstein Quote: If it cannot be proven by an experiment it called belief UnQuote. He then continued Quote: But the earth orbits around the sun, Unquote. I see you laughing! You seriously think that Einstein did not know there was no scientific proof of the Heliocentric model, seriously! The man gave us messages, very solemnly, under the very scrutinizing eye of the Elite he was the instrument of. Just like Brian Cox, in the exact same position, mentioning in NASA’ s Vacuum facility that there is no “force” retaining the feather. If for one instant, you thought that Einstein did not know the fact that there is no scientific proof of the Universe, well you are a very, simple minded individual.
Scratch Conscience🧠
Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done.
REAL SCIENCE LOOKS LIKE THIS:
And the “experimental report” looks like this: Scientifically, life as we know it, could not exist without oxygen! Correct? You would agree, that without oxygen, we could not be. Humans are 80% H20. So, plainly explained, NO OXYGEN = NO LIFE! You would agree.
Scientifically, this experiment clearly disproves, gravity. Thus the same simple statement stands: NO GRAVITY = NO UNIVERSE. You cannot obtain Gravitational Attraction, without Gravity it is a very plain logical statement, IMPOSSIBLE Stands Proud & Tall. If gravity existed, the feather would fall at the same speed, no matter where it is on Earth. In or out of the vacuum chamber and vacuum ON or OFF. If we come back out of the Vacuum for an instant, it is Mass Density in opposition with Air Density. The more density your object offers, faster the fall, this because the air particles offer less resistance to your mass. Now, take that same feather, and drop it once deployed out of the Vacuum. Then, make a ball out of it with your hands, and drop it again in the same conditions as before, it now falls at a faster speed because it now offers more density to oppose the air particles. It’s weight is not augmented in any way, it is simply distributed with more Density. That is the PROOF THAT GRAVITY IS A MYTH.
Gravity having been disproven by an Applied Science Experiment, under, “severe” Scientific conditions, NASA’s, own Vacuum Facility. LORAS, Logical, Observational, REVERSED Applied Science, brings the following Statement.
I, therefore, declare the universe NUL AND VOID.
I, DECLARE THAT THE UNIVERSE DOES NOT EXIST.
Scratch Conscience🧠☯
Shall it be Said, Shall it be Written, Shall it be Done.
@@Markhope-e3z wow you’re clever. I wish I was clever like you. I can’t understand why you’re not celebrated as the cleverest person in the world.
Sensors to detect radiation and to make sure it's safe for astronauts to go to the moon???????????
Yeh i noticed that. Makes you think.
@@markone3862 No, not really.
A child would know about the Sun, the big yellow thing in the sky, that occasionally fires off solar flares. Shocked you do not
@@coffeeandbytes9854 Perhaps it's time you did.
Its almost like living on the moon exposes you to more radiation than walking on it for a few hours
On your first visit you dont care about radiation,but now you bloody care and want to check for radiation first and human expedition comes after?
Is this admitting that first visit was fake?
Why do they need all this data' a thought they already been to the moon' obviously not.
Because this is totally different technology and needs to be assessed before sending humans.
@@tonywilliams3844 no, it is because this is the first time a human really will fly and try to land on the moon
@@peterkovac1489 don't talk shit, moon landing denier.
so you would go up in starship right now? how many blew up?. this is the first launch of this rocket, a million things could go wrong. How many times have we sent humans into orbit, yet starship still has not done that. so you would really just hop on this untested rocket and go around the moon?
Because now it's economically viable, and with the possibility of mining helium 3.
In the cold war, this adventure was nothing but a very expensive ideology conflict to beat the Soviets, that were ahead on the space race and propaganda, to show which ideology is the best. At the time of Apolo 13, people were already uninterested, it got more attention because it almost failed. Congress was already calling for a downgrade of the program.
I thought man had gone to the moon so se would already know ... so am unmanned flight to see how it would effect people clearly states we've never been before !!!!
Wow ! The Nevada desert is almost perfectly round, just like the bottom of a well used pan.
The goddess Artemis is so clever!
The CGI is jaw droppingly good.👍
Thanks BBC very convincing.
Let's be honest, the CGI could be allot better. It's like they've given up.
@@swiftwalker444
Agree 😂
Can't wait to hear what flat earthers would say about this video lol
something something cgi i'm sure
Still using rockets? LOL
Why do they need to do an unmanned flyby followed by a manned flyby before we can dare risk landing on the surface? I thought we already landed on the moon like nobody's business 60 years ago.
Their testing the module, not if the actual trip is safe.
Would you jump into a prototype car and go full pelt on the motorway without any safety information??
Because we value human life on an essentially experimental spacecraft? If you recall, in our race to get to the moon in the 60s we lost 3 astronauts on the ground in a fire and almost lost another 3 on apollo 13. So ya I think nasa is gonna be playing it safe this goaround.
As with anything that has never been done before, we need to take baby steps. We have never landed on the moon before, so we need to take baby steps until we are able to do it for the first time.
@@marcusfossa6695 you plank -,-
@2:02 it's almost as if human's have never been to the Moon before.
I can see how it might seem that way if you have no idea what you’re talking about and haven’t bothered looking into it at all.
@@JohnHazenhousen I can see how my comment might seem that way if you have no idea what you're talking about and haven't bothered to look into it at all.
Ah yes… The dude who made his own research that knows better than every astronaut and rocket scientist 😂
That's because we have never been and cannot "go to the moon" since it is not a physical mass of rock in an impossible space vacuum that defies the laws of physics and logic. Same repeated lies for a new generation, this is the biggest satanic lie being played on humanity of all time and a great time of tribulation to expose peoples true faith.
Yep you guessed it more CGI of the moon and earth 😂😂😂
Feel free to provide the evidence for your positive claim at any time. I wouldn't want anyone to think you're making up stories and spouting them as fact...
I was expecting some better footage 🤦🏼♂️
So they're actually gunna send people to the moon? Wow, what a time to be alive.
Essa, Hamza, Hasan,Adam.
Thought we had all that data from the last missions to the moon? Acting like we've never been there before
The earth is 4x bigger than the moon it should look much larger than that from the moon. In comparison of how the moon looks like from earth! It should look approximately 4x bigger than the moon looks like from earth using simple math,correct?
Of course it should, yeah, cause you know exactly how it should look, you were only there last Tuesday lolololol. What a dick. Think before you post.
No, it's just your paranoia.
@@spencerlievens what a sausage smoker. I'm talking from the perspective of how the moon looks like from earth and its size in comparison. Like a reverse perspective! No, cause you don't think at all because your to busy "smoking sausage ".
But you're not viewing the earth as an observer on the surface of the moon. You're seeing the moon and earth while in orbit of the moon. You can clearly see the curve of the moon in this picture. Also how would you decide how large the earth is in the "sky' compared to the "moon" from this picture?
Depends on the camera lens for one. Also look at the moon when it's low it's larger do to atmospheric distortion. No or very little atmosphere on the moon.
Kinda glossed over the splashdown as if it was a done deal. It's arguably one of the most important tests that those mannequins will face. We already know about the radiation levels and g-forces involved in lunar orbit.
They have conducted splashdown tests prior to this mission.
@@dansv1 They've tested every system and every component. Artemis I is a full-scale integrated test. It has to return to Earth on the right trajectory, the capsule has to separate successfully, the heat shield has to do its job and _then_ there's the splashdown.
I have little doubt that it will be successful but it's not a foregone conclusion. After the launch it's probably the riskiest part of the mission.
How about a close up of where you "landed" all those years ago?
Nobody involved in the space program has any obligation to prove anything to dimwits.
@@coffeeandbytes9854 Why so hostile? Did I touch a nerve you gullible moron?
you guys lol
Grow up. You can see the landing sites clearly
They can't! That's why the crybabies get upset when you mention it 😂
I can see the pub from here!
Do you people really believe this is real??? Grow up and WAKE UP!??
Tell us more about how you are very expert and better able to judge what's real than experts in their fields of study.
If you were any more asleep you would be dead. 👍
Do you believe it's not real? Wake up, your soul depends on it:)
Why another few years for humans to the moon? Assessing if it's safe for humans?
"Most of these sensors are going to be getting an idea if the environment is going to be safe " ? Haven't we been there before ? Buz, Neil ? They done ok as did the other astronaut's who went there.
New landing site mayhaps
Maybe NASA got rid of all the data they had from back then? so now they pay to get it all again,, just the government wasting money as normal.
They didn't really care about that stuff back then lol
@@jayemlov yeah, they were in a rush.
@ The Fezz
You point out quite a blatant anomaly. If Neil & Buzz landed there in the 60's, and with a number of subsequent return visits by others in the 70's, during which the main craft must have been orbiting the moon (with the astronaut on board that was not part of the landing party for each mission), it is difficult to comprehend what the purpose of the mission (reported on by the BBC) really is.
Congrats for using km., BBC.
It's amazing that we are attempting to do something we achieved over 40 years ago. We should take 2 cars up there this time.
It's 50 years.
@@yvonneplant9434 Well we should be able to send a motorcycle up there too then. Jump some craters!
Yes in a capsule modular big enough to fit 2 men. Lol
@@dutchschultz3076 Yeah, it does seem like a backward step compared to the 50 year old missions. Could they not just strap it on the side again? You would think that they never went!
@@IvanMectin how do you know whether or not they plan on bringing rovers to the moon? Artemis 1 is not manned and is not landing, Artemis 3 will have an entirely new spacecraft used for landing, one that is more than capable of holding several rovers inside of it
Look.... The Earth is round 😆👍
@@1newme425 Hahaha good one 🤣
How is this awesome? We did this in 1968 with Apollo 8... except Apollo 8 had people onboard. Artemis is a sham.
Show us the u.s flag where Armstrong allegedly landed. You have the camera of this satellite and hubble and james webb at your disposal. There was no moon landing.
China is building its space station, it won't be long before they use their cameras to scan the moon and debunk the moon landing hoax. That will be a great embarrassment to the u.s and nasa.
The reason they have these stations is not for scientific reasons. That's how they delude the public and atheists. Your leaders are pagans who worship shayateen (jinn devils). And their gods I.e. the jinn devils have stations in the heavens where they eavesdrop on the conversation of the angels stationed in our heaven. The angels receive news from Allah relating to their world or our world. If the news relates to our world, they talk about it, saying: such and such would happen. The jinn devils work day and night trying to capture anything from that conversation, then they fly down to earth and deceive men into taking them as gods who know the future events. How many nations did not believe in that? So I think that instead of flying down to the Kuhhan (oracles) lest the shooting stars hit them like in the old days, then the pagan worshippers of the jinn set up these space stations, acting as quicker way for the devils to transmit the words that they eavesdropped on. Nasa was founded by satanists, Jack Parsons who dreamet that the Dajjal came to him.
Allah سبحانه وتعالى said,
أَمْ عِندَهُمُ الْغَيْبُ فَهُمْ يَكْتُبُونَ
Or is the Ghaib (the Unseen) with them, so that they can write it down? [Al-Qalam 68:47]
أَمْ عِندَهُمْ خَزَائِنُ رَبِّكَ أَمْ هُمُ الْمُصَيْطِرُونَ
Or are with them the treasures of your Lord? Or are they the tyrants with the authority to do as they like?
أَمْ لَهُمْ سُلَّمٌ يَسْتَمِعُونَ فِيهِ ۖ فَلْيَأْتِ مُسْتَمِعُهُم بِسُلْطَانٍ مُّبِينٍ
Or have they a stairway (to heaven), by means of which they listen (to the talks of the angels)? Then let their listener produce some manifest proof. [At-Tur 52:37-38]
queens behind
Im sorry but those moon images suck. My back yard telescope can get better pictures
Can your backyard telescope transmit those images that distance?
For the same reason, here on earth, high frequency antennas need to be installed at shorter distance and at quantity, the faster the data stream the weaker the range will become. This is the quick and compressed version streamed at a lower quality, I'm sure they will be able to transmit better with time.
How far does your telescope transmit images?
@@1newme425 It's about the frequency, not speed.
@@1newme425 The data is transmitted in binary form, 1 and 0, positive signal and the absence of it. The shorter the waves, the more faster they alternate between "1" and "0" in the same amount of time, and as I said the range gets shorter. With direct laser communication you would need a array of satellites in both orbits, one backing up the other while it goes beyond sight or optimal signal. Without that they have to communicate through wide frequencies.
Can u take that again, my eyes are closed in that picture
*R.i.p. to all the victims of the CONvid genocide! Those complicit must face severe punishment.*
A waste of money and a waste of time can I see something different. Something that gonna blow my mind please no rocks floating around in space and CGI.
BS!
I'm so pleased for you :-)
Awesome 👍
So it's taken Nasa 50 years to do what Nasa did 50 years ago, but with real humans. It just shows what faith they have in their current engineers.
Health and safety is taken much more seriously these days. You can't just send astronauts up in an untested spacecraft, so they did a dress rehearsal first.
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Apollo had unmanned test flights prior to Apollo 7. It make sense that Artemis has unmanned test flight as well.
@@skysurfer5cva Exactly. And assuming that Artemis I meets all of its objectives and splashdown in the Pacific goes according to plan, paving the way for Artemis II being the first crewed flight, it will arguably be more successful than Apollo 4, 5 and 6 combined.
_That_ shows what faith NASA has in its engineers. One perfect dress rehearsal, rather than the three less-than-perfect test flights that were required before Apollo 7.
NASA'S back in the saddle again....Space Cowboys.....Go NASA....
That’s so fake
Nope. Next? :-)
The Artemis “spacecraft” is called Orion.
Nice CGI 🤣🤣🤣🥳🥳🥳
Small brain
@@somatotrophin1535 Keep on clinging to the globe and insults 🤣
@@LevelEarth2021 Flatearther detected.
Wow!
I hope you read this message and take it into consideration I’m not telling you this to scare you I’m telling you this because I love you I don’t need to know you to love you the rapture is about to take place they will be 7 years where the gates of hell will be opened on this earth it will literally be hell on earth you must repent turn away from your sins accept Jesus as your lord and saviour believe he has been raised on the 3rd day call on his name and you will be saved it’s not about religion it’s about a relationship
Waste of money 💴, $24 BILLION DOLLARS 💸, A WASTE.
Scientific advance is a waste of money? Look at their military budget.
Is strange that couldn’t get photos of the moon Apollo 11 moon lander and the Apollo 17 rover???
Why?
It's not strange, because they were miles and miles away from the surface when they flew over. Other satellites have taken those pictures though
Well NASA has finally repeated what it did in 1966 with Luna 10! WoWoo! Not sure I would be bragging.
I'm sure you're the kind of guy who can fix it in your garage over the weekend. 😂
@@mururoa7024 Too busy.. He probably has a previous appointment in Bakhmut.
Because you achieve a multi-billion dollar rocket launch every week right? Grow up man.
Always the idiots thinking they know better.
0:21 What is it? Looks like very poor CGI.
That speeded up footage looks fine to me.
This is so fake it's laughable
So dark in space 😂😂. And if the moon is between the earth and sun. Should not the shadow on the capsule be different ?
@@lbj2642 no, it shouldn't. Stop being so paranoid.
@@tonywilliams3844 how about you stop believing in cgi 😂😂.
@@lbj2642 ah, the go to answer for the conspiracy nutcases.
@@lbj2642 CGI wasn't around during the late 60's and early seventies, muppet.
where is the camera that took the selfie?
on a drone
@@rleriche5044 I JUST LOOKED IT UP ON NASA. IT HAS CAMS ON THE SOLAR ARRAY ARMS
Cheers
Anybody wondering why the BBC is telling us this but not American MSM?
A possible reason may be that it's part of a survey of the UK public?