The grammeters aren't polar, they're cardinal. The turboencabulator is the correct instrument for testing Ken's hypotheses, though. At least, that's my suspicion.
Love the salad at the beginning setting of the sarcasm tone for the video. That broken key on your keyboard set off my OCD all I wanted to do the whole video was lift that dam thing up.
I can't answer any of those questions, PW. I'll just say that I enjoy your videos. You have a unique wit, laced with sarcasm and the occasional double entendre. See you in 2022!
Takes a very big person to openly admit (especially this publicly) that they were wrong. But it also shows a lot of integrity and intellectual honesty and therefore only increases the validity of the arguments raised in the past on subjects you do know about. You do actually know the earth is a globe, right?
@Roger because when one learns new, updated knowledge, one can let go of the old, outdated knowledge. When one had beliefs, they simply hold on tighter to them rather than to change their beliefs.
@@SpencerGBful And that single statement shows how dumb you are. When there is mountains of evidence to the contrary and not one single piece of evidence, or a single measurement of anything to prove the flat earth, you go and say something as stupid as that.
As a physicist I have it easier but still I am careful not to criticize an argument unless I understand well what the person tries to say and why it is wrong.
@@glensalch3156 You see, on top of K-12 education, I have studied physics five years for my master degree and then I was a graduate student for six more years. And you say you know physics better than me. Welcome to the Dunning-Kruger club.
AB Science did a couple of rebuttal videos on Ken’s s videos. Given AB’s background in studying magnetism, I would recommend you watch those. Very interesting.
There's an awful lot of pseudoscientific nonsense having to do with magnetism, so people really need to be careful to check the sources of what they're watching, listening to, or reading. For example, anyone pushing anything to do with the "electric universe" are just total crackpots.
It seems that no-one has bothered to answer the questions I posed around 5:30 Surely somebody understands Ken well enough to tell me what I'm missing here, right?
Question #2 it is generally accepted the law of conservation of charged particles. Counter space (aether) is the particles by themselves. the dielectric inertial plane is a gradient that allows the particles to do work on physical objects. It does not have to create particles. They cycle back to counter space, which coincides with the law of conservation of charges. We cannot feel forces without a gradient, gradients are why everything happens.
Regarding question #1, strictly speaking everything in space affects everything else through deformation of space-time by mass. The ether or was proposed as a medium by which light could propagate through space. When it was proved that no such medium exists it was eventually determined that electromagnetic waves are self-propagating. We don't need an ether for that so the concept was dropped by science since our understanding expanded to clear up the need for it. Not really an answer to question two but I'm not sure there needs to be one. "Counterspace" sounds very much like word salad to me. I don't think it's a thing that exists, but I'm not completely clear on what Ken means by it. No idea on question #3.
Sickens me that you wish to engage with that bonehead. While he might be interesting on some levels, his compromised and hypocritical ideology is ripe for ripping apart.
I used to do a lot of photography and I came across Ken Wheeler's channel multiple times. He was known to used other peoples images and copy reviews from smaller channels almost word for word. I remember one video where the American government pleaded with him to do some super special work for them and he refused. A lot of the people arguing for Ken Wheeler were a guy called Ken Wheeler using aliases. There was a guy (whose name I’ve totally forgotten) was more than a bit obsessive about debunking him. He showed how so many of the names trailed back to KW.
I was totally skeptical of him at first. It took a lot of reading boring books more than once and my own experiments to realize Ken Wheeler is correct about field theory and magnetism. When you get into the meta/physics it makes sense. Just because you don't understand something or like the person information is coming from, that doesn't negate truth. Also, anyone who even touches flat earth with a stick is a fool and not worth debating any science.
IOW: when you learned the terms and definitions, and it all made sense… No scientific breakthrough since Tesla, indicates error and flawed science. With Ken’s definitions, all paradoxes disappear and it can be explained via classical physics. Cudos for being able to correct your self. It is the sign of true intelligence!
Are you saying there has been no scientific breakthroughs since Tesla? And are you saying that all of the universe can be explained from a classical physics perspective, completely negating all of quantum mechanics once Ken's theories on the dielectric field are integrated?
Sorry, PW - but even after watching Veritasium's video (& only partially understanding it!) I still cannot shake my impression of Ken Wheeler as a word-salad-meister who deliberately sows confusion and complexity for the PRIMARY purpose of making himself appear as some highbrow scientific intellectual, when any genuine scientific objective would be to impart and share knowledge in the easiest and most practical manner! Ken utterly fails at this! How about asking Veritasium for their opinion on Ken's explanations of electricity, dielectric and the ether??
@@maxine_q - Oh well, I guess he was just too good at it! As a Brit, I normally grasp irony and sarcasm almost instinctively - but this one just passed me by!!
It’s easy to understand what Ken says if you actually try to understand what he is saying. Who cares about big words, if your complaining about big words that’s shows your level of intelligence. If you really wanted to understand magnetism you would approach every theory with an open mind. Don’t negative criticize a man because you don’t understand what he is saying. Take the time to actually understand it
Got yer answers right here, me ol' Trout, all nice 'n' concise: A1: Vegemite A2: Sky hooks A3: Timbits Get it now? Of course you do. You're welcome, eh?
Dont pretend this is some avant garde trolling of his own audience. It's not. Who tf makes a video about how HOW Hitler isn't all bad because he was a vegetarian painter, while eating a bowl of sauerkraut? Nice try. He became an apologist for a provably unscientific cult leader, and talked me I to unsubbing all in one fell swoop. This is pandering to his trolls, nothing more.
What’s really funny is that P.W. actually had to make a follow up video explaining exactly what I said in my OP because some vocal individuals were just wanting it to be true so desperately. But fortunately those few suffering from hollow head syndrome can repeat the idea of P.W. Being serious over and over all they want, but that doesn’t magically make their delusions a reality. Astonishingly enough, it’s still missed by so many dense individuals because of the issues with the very nature of satirical content and the social adequacy’s required for cognitive comprehension. But it still shouldn’t be an issue to anyone smarter than a house fly.
Question 1: All things in Spacetime are in contact with each other by being connected by the tensor field of SpaceTime itself, as characterized by Einstein. Imagine 1,000 corks floating in a swimming pool. They are connected by the tension of the water between them.
How can you prove that the corks are held together by surface tension? Have you tested this hypothesis, or can you cite any tests supporting this hypothesis?
@@Mike-bs5pi corks held together with surface tension-no corks connected through surface tension- yes considering this is a single water body, it must have a surface connecting all the corks, surface of water has surface tension idk then.
@@rainbowsquash673 false axioms like what? if A = B and B = C then A=C. Does this sound wrong to you? mathematics is built from the ground up using such axioms that are agreeable by everyone. Tell me one false axiom. If you want to believe that unicorns exist and shit rainbows then call it the truth throught "logic" by saying "its obvious brrrruh get smart lol dummy", then go ahead. If a false explaination makes sense to you, sitting in your couch never actually going about to learn, then it doesnt mean its correct
That Ken Wheeler uses his "knowledge" to make youtube videos instead of turning it into millions of dollars / publishing papers on his views is most interesting to me.
Publishing peer-reviewed papers does not generate revenue. I published an Amazon #1 Best Seller in the Physics of Gravity, and I am far from wealthy. But, let me say to your point that he could perform experiments, test his theories, publish testable equations, or ANYTHING besides sitting on his Gold Bond zone and waxing condescending to the rest of us about what he supposedly knows.
@@UFOUAPMagnet Nicely put! He at least appears to subscribe to the Rush Limbaugh / Donald Trump model of ego comes first and foremost, truth and integrity somewhere far down the list. But that's just my opinion, no empirical evidence from experimentation or anything.
@@UFOUAPMagnet I agree, I think he is trying to help himself first. rather than publishing his experiments like you said it makes no f all money publishing papers. Compared to being a UA-cam guru
To clear up your third question. There is no negative dielectric pressure modifying the foil of counterspace. Keep in mind the net annular current flow is zero.
Net Current flow cannot be zero. We constantly have emf’s being charged and discharged. Through the aether From the original source of the perturbation, like a snake eating is own tail. We have millions of tonnes of copper and iron deposits and millions of tonnes of molten ferrous magma moving past those deposits, creating a massive current flow which also causes a magnetic field. Also the same for our oceans are one massive lord kelvin generator, salt water moving past large iron and copper deposits....
The verbal dielectric of your quantificable espousements are conflabitambly conflabulable with the flumpabulous ideology that Arkham’s quantable metric is indeed relevant when considering the umphet establishment of a slobalum hypothesis. Great video
Ben Eater has a fantastic series wherein he builds a computer from (electronic) scratch. I highly encourage anyone interested to check it out. He breaks it down logically, adding sensible functions only after the present functionality is fully understood and working.
If im understanding your 1st Q.. Do you know what a fractal is ? Do you know what holography is? The aether is the point of complete rest. or pure Inertia it lies at the centre of all phenomena .. because it is counter spacial it has no fixed locus , no place in space.. so it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time.. Understanding the torus geometry and it's inverse geometry the hyperboloid you will understand the physical/ metaphysical universe we live in. The aether ( Dielectric) is the inverse of our 3d material existence (magnetism) and vice versa. You need to watch a lot of ken wheeler videos to familiarise yourself with words he uses but the Torus is all he is really talking about.
I wish we talked like this in the States. I mean, I do, but no one gets it. It's pork pies in a bag of tripe, isn't it? He's havin a tin bath, takin the piss, sixes and sevens, a floppy Muppet. I get you bro. It's also total bloody bollocks,, mate. Crack on.
I disagree, I think the words matter, and seriously helps to understand what is actually happening, helps visualize too, just cuz your a dunce and dumbed down doesn't mean he should dumb it down for the rest of us!
Watch Eric Dollard's lectures on the history on electricity. They're freely available on UA-cam and cover everyone from Maxwell, Heaviside, Steinmetz etc etc and he defines counterspace, aether and dielectricity very well.
@@Emperorhirohito19272 those individuals are the Mt Rushmore on subject. I see you didn't wear boots today, that dog shit is quite engaging to scrub off XD
"Disproved" isn't really a word we like to use - proofs are the domain of mathematics. But yes, despite what the flat earth idiots think, the Michelson / Morely experiments failed to confirm the predictions made by the aether hypothesis. The aether is a discarded 19th century idea with no place in modern physics
@@drlegendre This comment baffles me. On one side it seems like a "critique". But it also seems like a person trying present themselves as intelligent but not quite getting there. Do you know what I mean?
“How does nothing within space itself touch every aspect of space.” Im not sure i quite understand your question. If I understand you correctly this is my answer. Space itself is not a thing, it has no properties, it is an absence. The Einstein idea that space and time can be bent or manipulated is utter nonsense and there is a simple analogy that proves this. If someone told you that you could take your shadow cast by the sun and nail it to a wall (like from peter pan) you would obviously say they were crazy. Although we name our shadow and in human language we speak as if its a actual thing, the reality is it is a privation, the absence of the phenomenon we call light. You can only “do” things to matter. You can bend a spoon, shatter a piece of glass, cut a piece of wood, you cant do that to a privation or the absence of stuff. Space is the absence of matter, shadow is the absence of light. The Aether is the only field that truly exists. Everything else is an expression of that field the same way water can be ice, liquid, or gas. Or how water can move as a longitudinal wave or a transverse one. The ways that the field is expressed create light, magnetism, electricity, gravity, etc. the field permeates everything and does not exist in what we would call conventional space. And the fact that these things are not physical makes it very difficult for the mind to wrap around. All we know and understand is the space inside of s box and the stuff inside of it. Eric P. Dollard explains these concepts i believe better than i can, and he also explains the concept of the electron, one in which the discoverers and engineers of the electrical world believed, which is that the electron is not s physicsl negatively charged ball orbiting an atom, but rather the end point of a line of force. Imagine the eraser end og s pencil being pressed into a piece of clothe , on the other side where you cannot see the pencil you find a raised area, a bump. For every piece of matter in existence, the Aether connects to it via lines of force, and the end points are called electrons. And a theory that was proposed at one point by i believe JJ Thompson was that some of the mass of objects is actually held in the Aether via this connection. And since static electricity as well as lightning is the result of lines of force snapping after a saturation event in the aether, its was theorized that if you could disconnect all of the lines of force from your body, you could accelerate and decelerate instantly. The example used was a car. Anyways i hope this answers your question, space has no properties, its a privation. And the Aether connects to all things on a molecular level via lines of force terminating in what we call electrons which do not have mass at rest.
While that's a fun and interesting thought, it's not a good claim without something to verify any aspect of it being true. For example i can claim space is actually a rapidly flowing hyper light superfluous liquid that exerts great pressure when it's direction is challenged, forcing 'bubbles' of denser gases to bound together via buoyancy, which repel the liquid and form atmospheres and an escape from the crushing pressure. The pressure is still present though, and is being pushed from all sides as the liquid wraps around the sphere, causing a downwards pressure towards the centre of a sphere which is what modern science believe is gravity. But it's not mass pulling, it's liquid pushing from the outside. That's the absolute undeniable truth - prove me wrong
@@MelodicTurtleMetal actually there is over 100 years of scientific research and experimentation for my theory. Nearly all the electrical engineers that came up with the math and inventions to harness electricity believed these things. So to your example. You couldnt say that your theory is true but you also believe Nasa who claims to send space craft into space and that space is not some light liquid. If your theory were true Nasa would have to no about it and engineer their spaceships around the problems caused by it. Likewise you can either believe the titans that developed electricity, or you can say they are all wrong. And it is my argument that they couldnt not have developed everything they did and simultaneously be wrong about how everything worked.
@@unshapingtheearth7916 i can say they are all wrong einstein has been wrong stephen hawkins Nicola tesla anyone you look up to has and we've proved them wrong mutiple time, yes they were right about what they proved, but were aslo wrong about many thing they couldnt prove. there's 200+ years of research regarding perpetual machine would you be willing to say the titans who though such a machine exists are wrong? smh
Eric p dollard explains this as well from an actual engineering perspective however he is a dinosaur in his field and pioneering highly theoretical works
I think you've been watching too many videos on trap door spiders. But I've only been using my critical thinking skills to counter Ken Wheeler's claims, not my knowledge of electricity and magnetism which is not extensive.
aether is just a word . Penultimate of 100% nothing < penultimate of 100% something . < this sign is oversimplied . You would need greater then tetration since the..... Anyway you get the point
Veritasium was not entirely right, and deliberately left out important parts, especially when talking about DC As shown in his diagrams. He also left out I2R losses.
There is a spool of something like 38 miles of fibre at a trading exchange (IEX?) to slow down signaling. Vintage oscilloscopes used coils of coax to delay signals enough for the horizontal trace to start for delayed trigger modes. There may be something I'm not seeing here. I get induction and capacitive coupling - I need to watch Veritasium's video again.
@@johnnyragadoo2414 And in analog video camera (the spool of coax) and in analog reverb equipment. I think that the key point in coax, not single wire.
Don't forget he said assume zero resistance in the wiring as if it were a superconductor. There was no reason to overcomplicate it by factoring in even more unknowns.
Ken Wheeler is a gifted man. His ideas are difficult to grasp at first, but once one's mind gets around initial skepticism everything kinda clicks. Then suddenly he makes more sense (by far) than other theories claiming things like "virtual photons". (Nonsense)
I have followed KW since 2016. It has taken me years to not fully understand his alternative take on science. Now, coaxial light circuits seem far more feasible than virtual photons. Magnetism is less of a mystery. The guy is off the scale and can be entertaining too although he does get a lot of bad press...
@@craige7007 if had you actually studied it woudve made sense, you just want everything to be "it feels wrong so it must be", a good amount of modern quantum physics is very new and constantly evolving. We propose hypothesis and test them through research and experiments then throw out what fails, the models that are currently in use havent been disproven or are extremely accurate with most real world results. You have a model that works? tell us about it in standarized words and definitions, do some experiments, make predictions through it then well see if it holds up. The guy you believe is schizophrenic
Ken makes a science picture. His ferrocell explanations are completely wrong. Specular refraction was the cause I think? Just reflection stuff and not fields made visible.
I’ve been in invested in practicing a lot of engineering and studying scientific theory these last few years and all I can say is my opinion is that sometimes Ken Wheeler is right and sometimes he’s wrong. I have no clue whether he’s more wrong or more right but it’s just human nature to have misconceptions about some things. Many of his ideas I find very interesting and logical but I wish he provided more replicable proofs for his claims as there are many other supporting theories to combat his explanation and it’s hard to believe what you haven’t done and seen. One thing I’ve invested a lot of time studying and I want to see Ken Wheeler’s take on is the electrolysis of H2O using DC current electrodes and caustic hydroxides as electrolyte. When I’ve performed this myself I produced hydrogen and oxygen gas, oxygen at the positive electrode, hydrogen at the negative electrode. I’ve been really trying to wrap my head as to why in H2O electrolysis, the paramagnetic O2 product and the diamagnetic H2 is produced at specific electrodes and how the gas molecules can travel to different electrodes through the water in order to separate. For those who don’t know, H2O electrolysis is essentially just shearing apart water molecules into gaseous HHO rocket fuel using electricity. The HHO (H2 + O2) also burn together to form water (H2O). With a stoichiometric ratio of 2 mols of H2 and 1 mol of O2 the flame will burn at over 5,000° F and produce only pure water in the form of hot steam as a emission.
So, here's a good method for establishing whether or not someone like Ken is actually correct with his assertions; Has he actually published any official research on the topics he covers, and failing that is there any official research published by other sources which actually corroborates the claims he makes? So far, the most I can find on him regarding published work is his book, which doesn't even come close to making him a credible source of scientific information. All this shows is that he's intelligent enough to mix actual facts with his BS to make it seem more credible.
@@druidjackson527 Oh, btw you know who knows I am right about magnetism? Your buddy Ken. He literally wrote me and asked me for a copy of my #1 Amazon Best Seller in the Physics of Gravity. Boy, did you step on a landmine 👈🤣
@@UFOUAPMagnet you know it could be to use your theory like LEGO. It’s just one of the blocks. Your so intellectually tied to your “#1” selling paper that your afraid to add to it, because it means it was only accurate based on the information you had available to you at the time. Try and build on what you published don’t be afraid to says some areas of what you said is not quite accurate and needs improvement based on new information. Don’t get stuck in your own information bias and a best selling high horse. I think your a smart man, I wish you all the best
Clearly the issue is with how Ken presents it. For instance, he has never addressed how waldorf chik'n elements interact with cruton crumbles or even how cole's slaw fields work to bind it all together. Perhaps he should add some elements from Greek ideas and include how feta fro-mage introduction can add contrast to the bowl field. He could use try less empasis on nockluu dressing, so people can actually see the hidden dissonace layers in his picked cherry medley function and could become aware of the false fairae structure underlying his work?
Let’s just make a Greek salad with some of that fillo pastry. But seriously you guys could be making your own contributions to understanding of magnetic fields. I think it’s easier to mock rather than clarify and build on a theory.
@@vlogcity1111 _But seriously you guys could be making your own contributions to understanding of magnetic fields_ - Oh no! got me there! If only someone actually did that for a living... oh wait... So... where are your efforts?
@@FeCoNi_science why would I publish intellectual property that can be directly profited from. The downfall of every inventor is trying to help too many people at once. AB I suggest if you make any breakthrough inventions or applications of your theories, go to medium sized companies and leverage your intellectual property for a 5-25% share. Or a salary or lump sum and a share. I’m not joking. You can’t help the world if your down an out yourself. Edit: I’m not saying I don’t want to publish my results, I’m saying it is personal economic suicide if you publish a breakthrough you have not patented yet or are unable to get a patent. People only freely publish results That do not affect their personal finances negatively. You see AB there is a lot of economic incentive behind your education. Or education by omission which is what it really is. Try and look past all the economic bias of the information your were taught......energy is a trillion dollar industry.
So I guess this from sciencing....c.....o.......m isn't a thing? "In one ampere of current, 6.242 × 10 to the 18th electrons are flowing every second. Multiply the strength of the current by this number to find the number of electrons flowing in the circuit per second."
It's really simple the magnetic divergence of the dialectric inertial plain manifests itself is in a counterspacial toroidal hyperbolic modality. These convergent tangential conjugate counterspacial toruses spin at the inverse of counterspacial Flux acceleration giving the hyperbolic toroidal conjugate spheroid it's rotating coaxial.
lol, this guy gets it. Though you could at least address his questions. 😅 Ether is akin to the Higgs field. It’s like describing a field and needs no modality aside from maybe a spatial coordinate system. As for the symmetry of the dielectric and gravity - they are geometrically equivalent and they follow the same principle of force vectors gravity and magnetism actually at singularities like black hole material is ejected in hyperbolic geometry as the frequency of all attracted perturbations are accelerated to the point that the mass dynamos are ejected - reentering spatial ether as fresh elements of hydrogen and different arrangements of matter
Just woke up. I'm going to have to watch again to sort out if this is a joke or a real apology. KW always seemed like he was spewing trash to me. Did he have real things to say?
"Did [KW] have real things to say?" We may never be certain. We do know he had a perturbation in the toroidal dielectric. With therapy and the latest anti-flatulence medication he's expected to make some kind of recovery. The rest of us, well, we may never recover.
In short, NO. I have an extensive and more highly regarded body of work on the subject of magnetism, and I can assure you that he is the road to ruin. It's a cult of pseudo science, with principles of magnetism borrowed from people like myself. I am a rebel of mainstream academia, but I am still scientific about it, and speak in plain terms. If you can't say it simply, you dont know what you're talking about.
The problem with luminipherous ether is not that it's inconsistent. It just failed to be observed, whereas the competing theory of special relativity was indeed verified time and time again. It's good to learn about these old theories, and there is value in that but do keep in mind that theories mean nothing without experiment. Experiments have killed the ether, and validated special relativity.
Well since light slows down and accelerates in different mediums, it can only be a wave. A wave of what? Of the aether. I mean to get away from all irony, that is the only logical explanation, unlike the mental gymnastics of what they try to tell you now
It makes more sense that the theory of relativity is a metaphor. It makes more sense it is describing the effects of aether on light etc., that it is a field phenomena. What is omitted from the theory of relativity is how space and time are warped, ie, since space is essentially nothing, how do you warp nothing? Or time? Time is motion of particles in space. How is the warping of time accomplished?
@@gerretw space-time is not nothing. It is space-time. When you're in motion with respect to me, I see your clock ticking slower, and I see your length contacted. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that.
You guys are the children! afraid to admit he was more intellectual integrity than you do. To admit faults and move forward with learning is as SANE as it gets. This is hilarious to think it’s better to move Forward like a horse with blinders on
It's on purpose. In a "debate" he had with a flatard named Jason, said flatard called it Dunning-Kerger. Planarwalk did a highlights video on 10th of March, and the gaffe occurs at about 14:46 in the video. He's even sported a Dunning-Kerger tee in a vid or 2, including "Flat Earther Tries To Prove Flat Earth With An Encyclopedia" Just saying for those who haven't seen some of Planarwalk's past videos.
Remarkable. This comment section still has people that miss the joke. In case it wasn't clear from the absolute nonsense... and the fact that he made a clarification video about it: This is trolling you Ken Wheeler fans.
There is smart folk that do not agree with Veritasium and even some debunk videos that make experiments that show that it is kind of true but not 100 % true, so do not fall for the trap of saying something is true just for one smart source did say so. When folk start to talk about gravity and magnetism, and electric universe it is always good to be sceptical, at least when they use language that is hard to understand and sound super complicated, for the simple truth is that we do not understand how gravity works, we do not even fully understand the electrons or the "spooky action at a distance", when it come to Veritasium thought experiment it is an hypothesis and not a explanation how it work.
I have seen some follow-up videos that investigated further into the claims made in the Vetitasium video. One was ElectroBOOM that made a simulation model, and another guy (forgot the channel's name) that made a physical experiment with parallel wires. Both showed that the current transmitted between the wires was mininal
Unfortunately Electro boom has demonstrated that he hasn't got the slightest understanding of the physics behind it. Wrong right hand, no understanding, why the Poynting has to point to the power source, wrong model and so on.
That's a question of the size and distance of the conductors. You can dimension them in a way that the lamp actually lights up somewhat immediately and does not burn out once the wave travelled the conductor and back. Fun fact: From the guy with the wires in the field you can calculate the wire gauge used from the current and voltage readings.
im glad you finaly came to terms with your own ignorance and could accept and learn from it. few people can do that now days. ego ran world.the science community was created with different terminolgy and fields for the same things to keep people divided and confused and only be able to create what the gov wants you to.
Even though Ken is somewhat critical of Walter Russell, I do think reading his book "the secret of light" can help one wrap their mind around the questions you're asking in this video. It would be a hard read for an atheist, yet I would still suggest they set their assumptions aside enough to understand that the book is about physics.
Knowing the words and phrases can make you sound authorative and knowledgeable. Stay on a specially crafted script and you are pretty bulletproof against anyone who has no special understanding. However get pulled off script and people without true understanding quickly reveal it. Unfortunately I have no special understanding and I found the idea of the energy flowing through the field rather than the wires uncomfortable. I am fine with the idea of the particle having charge that generates a field that can effect the field generated by another particle and so pass energy through the interaction of the two fields. It seemed Veritasium went further than that so I wish you well and hope you can explain it to us . . . eventually.
@@michael-bell Why doesn't the energy flow without the help of matter? We see matter in the form of wires and other physical components manipulate the field. We see matter affected by the field. Saying the energy is flowing through the field rather than the matter seems to run counter to my experience.
I feel like whatever this is, it’s going over my head. I know you can’t mean that KW is actually right, but finding it tough to find the satire/facetiousness key phrases… I’m not sure what it is I’m missing here, so help me out. Counterspace.
Counter space is the space between or within a defined threshold. The easiest way of conceptualising it is that counter space is the space between two points on a ruler.
@@harryjester282 counter space is the space between the sink and the stove that allows the semiotics of relativized formalisms to fully counter the space
That was my point on your other video. Ken Wheeler seems to go out of his way to get and make things sound more complex than they really are. He could actually explain it simply the way Derek (Veritasium) does. Ken puts a lot of effort into sounding smart and complex, whether he is right or wrong. Another point, this is a perfect example of why science will always win over religion or conspiracies like flat earth. When presented with new information, science adapts. It's okay to be wrong because that means you're learning something new.
I don't think he goes out of his way. I just think that's who he is. Him going out of his way to be more complex is just you projecting don't you think?
On your point around science, I don’t completly agree. Science SHOULD adapt to new information, but for reasons even showcased with this Ken Wheeler ’conflict’ facts in themselves are not enough. Either you lack enough understanding to be willing to accept what the facts might mean, or you lack the proper framework to understand them in the right way, which leads to scientists not adapting (even to what is ultimately true). There is also the second factor of scientists having strong egos and an ’expert’ position based on their knowledge that many won’t give up easily, making quite few budge to new/alternative facts. So to see science as only objective is very far from reality, it faces very similar biases as for example religion.
@@nocbvideos6458 yep i went and checked his later video to find it lmao. i only found his channel like 3 vids before this so i was like "no way this smart dude turned around"
That veritassium video was terrible, very misleading. If you have any questions feel free to hit me up. I'm a third year physics student. There is no aether, this is the most famous null result in all of experimental physics.
you asked , in short .ken says : Philosophical pressure mediation . Virtual .or not . Everything work this way . He does not say philosophically because it would be wrongly understood . Copilot understand this very concily
This is similar to the Einstein vs Newton farce. Heaviside simplified Maxwell's equations from about 20 down to 4 to end up with simple algebra for everyday situations. Similar to using F=ma instead of the tensors of Einstein's field equations . Everything, including electromagnetism is far more complicated in reality, but for most cases, a simplified version suffices by neglecting variables of small significance under the circumstances. So, you are welcome to use the calculus line integrals, gradient and curls to calculate electric fields for all situations or just use the simple algebraic ones like you were probably taught at school. Ken Wheeler just takes the complicated formulae and explanations and dresses them up with his own word salad to sound important. So Planarwalk, what you were taught was not wrong for everyday steady state use, but would probably only be so under, for instance, transient conditions.
It's a bit like Ohm's law. V=iR is only true for a perfect conductor. As soon as there is current flowing heating takes place and numbers start to change but for everyday use Ohm's law is good enough for practical considerations.
@@martinconnelly1473 Indeed. Also, F=ma is only true if the mass remains constant. With a rocket, the mass is rapidly changing from burning fuel. More correct becomes F=d mV/dt = m dV/dt +V dm/dt.
@@martinconnelly1473 V=iR is still true, it's just that R changes with temperature. And sometimes that's very useful, for example for making temperature sensors.
Well done. There is no shame in admitting you are wrong especially when you turn shame into pride by admitting that you now understand. The reason that a dunning Kruger affect happens is because of what we call beliefs. Beliefs happen when people take information they hope is true and want it to be true and they turn their thoughts into reality in their own mind. After people convince themselves that the thoughts they had in their mind are true then this becomes their reality even though outside their mind in the real world it is not true. This applies to everything. People form beliefs about science and religion and viruses and cures for those viruses. People want their thoughts and beliefs to be true so they cause them to become true in their own mind.
1st question would be answered by Euclidean geometry and henri poincare’s disk model of projective geometry (counter space or the ether is like a projective accretion disk and space is an after effect) this would be a reason why the hypertrocoid and hyperboloid are overly stated
I didn't catch the background on all this although I think I saw something by Wheeler well over a year ago. But if he's espousing hypotheses that contradict peer reviewed, published, mainstream science (he was a year ago), then he needs to get his stuff peer reviewed and published before it's deserving of much attention. It's like those Flat Earthers who ignore atmospheric refraction. I tell them, "Look, if you get your atmospheric refraction ideas peer reviewed and published, and the US military and the telecommunications industries incorporate your work into their training and design manuals, then I'll give you the time of day. Until then I can't be bothered."
Peer reviews mean absolutely nothin! Other than you appeal to authority and know how to word your theory to appeal to a broader intellect. It means you have to dilute your theory to only move the status quo forward two inches. Rather than blast through the generally accepted rubbish passed as degrees in academia today. You need to appease them... Again peer reviews mean bollocks
@@teddansonLA hahaha fortunately for you it is. Unfortunately you choose to appeal to authority rather than authenticity and knowledge. Not sure if your comment was intended to be sarcasm as it’s hard to detect if you have autism and even harder over a text comments.
Where have I appealed to authority? I can't see that in my comment. _Not sure if your comment was intended to be sarcasm_ Well then you are stupider than you appeared at first. _rather than authenticity and knowledge_ Ken Wheeler has almost no knowledge of electricity or magnetism. He's a crank, at best.
What knowledge do you have? Science doesn't understand gravity. Then you have to define which gravity you're talking about. Newtonian gravity, Einsteinian gravity, or any of the other gravity theories out there. Gravity is not understood and Scientists are still trying to work it out
I'll have to test Ken's hypothesis.
Does anyone know suppliers of hydrocoptic marzlevanes or polar grammeters?
They're on the back shelf next to the dunsels and gonkulators.
@@rustyclaymore1105 while I'm here, do you have any relative bearing?
The grammeters aren't polar, they're cardinal. The turboencabulator is the correct instrument for testing Ken's hypotheses, though. At least, that's my suspicion.
All I know is that my
B#!!$#!t detector is working perfectly.
@@UFOUAPMagnet the nice thing is you don't even have plug it in when the bs is piled this high. Saves wear and tear on the machine.
Love the salad at the beginning setting of the sarcasm tone for the video. That broken key on your keyboard set off my OCD all I wanted to do the whole video was lift that dam thing up.
I can't answer any of those questions, PW. I'll just say that I enjoy your videos. You have a unique wit, laced with sarcasm and the occasional double entendre. See you in 2022!
Takes a very big person to openly admit (especially this publicly) that they were wrong. But it also shows a lot of integrity and intellectual honesty and therefore only increases the validity of the arguments raised in the past on subjects you do know about. You do actually know the earth is a globe, right?
@Roger because when one learns new, updated knowledge, one can let go of the old, outdated knowledge. When one had beliefs, they simply hold on tighter to them rather than to change their beliefs.
I know for a 100% fact the earth is flat. It’s not even arguable in my eyes .
@@SpencerGBful And that single statement shows how dumb you are. When there is mountains of evidence to the contrary and not one single piece of evidence, or a single measurement of anything to prove the flat earth, you go and say something as stupid as that.
@@SpencerGBful yes but you're one of the believers whom we are trying to impart actual knowledge 🤔💕🖖
@@kevinscollan8293 actual knowledge? Like a globe? Its not even a question that it’s flat. Not at all.
As a physicist I have it easier but still I am careful not to criticize an argument unless I understand well what the person tries to say and why it is wrong.
You don't have it easier chap, you just think you do and have yet to realize that you have the same issue in understanding as Planarwalk here!!!
@@glensalch3156 Are you one of the guys who tries to teach physics to the physicists? If so, good luck!
@@arctic_haze lol.....how Scientific of you!!!
@@arctic_haze your focus on gravity has you blinded chap
@@glensalch3156 You see, on top of K-12 education, I have studied physics five years for my master degree and then I was a graduate student for six more years. And you say you know physics better than me. Welcome to the Dunning-Kruger club.
Kruger not Kurger
Umm, April fool's day is in April, not December.
very fun random fact is that in Spain we actually have "April" fools day on December well its not a holiday but its more of an end of year programme
AB Science did a couple of rebuttal videos on Ken’s s videos. Given AB’s background in studying magnetism, I would recommend you watch those. Very interesting.
There's an awful lot of pseudoscientific nonsense having to do with magnetism, so people really need to be careful to check the sources of what they're watching, listening to, or reading. For example, anyone pushing anything to do with the "electric universe" are just total crackpots.
It seems that no-one has bothered to answer the questions I posed around 5:30
Surely somebody understands Ken well enough to tell me what I'm missing here, right?
Question #2 it is generally accepted the law of conservation of charged particles.
Counter space (aether) is the particles by themselves.
the dielectric inertial plane is a gradient that allows the particles to do work on physical objects. It does not have to create particles. They cycle back to counter space, which coincides with the law of conservation of charges.
We cannot feel forces without a gradient, gradients are why everything happens.
Regarding question #1, strictly speaking everything in space affects everything else through deformation of space-time by mass.
The ether or was proposed as a medium by which light could propagate through space. When it was proved that no such medium exists it was eventually determined that electromagnetic waves are self-propagating. We don't need an ether for that so the concept was dropped by science since our understanding expanded to clear up the need for it. Not really an answer to question two but I'm not sure there needs to be one.
"Counterspace" sounds very much like word salad to me. I don't think it's a thing that exists, but I'm not completely clear on what Ken means by it.
No idea on question #3.
Sickens me that you wish to engage with that bonehead. While he might be interesting on some levels, his compromised and hypocritical ideology is ripe for ripping apart.
2) there are NO particles. Hope that helps.
@@karl4834 nice so an emotional reaction because he says something you dont understand.
Well played keeping a stright face through that. I see you got a lot of bites in the comments from people who have had their irony removed. 😂😂
_Ssshut up..._
If it is ironic, it's poorly presented.
You're in funny
i understand nothing
update after watching video im confused and know nothing
@@SarcasticBarman now you have the same experience that Ken Wheeler has 24/7
I used to do a lot of photography and I came across Ken Wheeler's channel multiple times. He was known to used other peoples images and copy reviews from smaller channels almost word for word. I remember one video where the American government pleaded with him to do some super special work for them and he refused. A lot of the people arguing for Ken Wheeler were a guy called Ken Wheeler using aliases. There was a guy (whose name I’ve totally forgotten) was more than a bit obsessive about debunking him. He showed how so many of the names trailed back to KW.
lol.... uncle Ken is always right.....
I was totally skeptical of him at first. It took a lot of reading boring books more than once and my own experiments to realize Ken Wheeler is correct about field theory and magnetism. When you get into the meta/physics it makes sense. Just because you don't understand something or like the person information is coming from, that doesn't negate truth. Also, anyone who even touches flat earth with a stick is a fool and not worth debating any science.
The cosmos doesn’t care about terms such as ‘physics’ or ‘metaphysics’.Either something is or it is not.
IOW: when you learned the terms and definitions, and it all made sense…
No scientific breakthrough since Tesla, indicates error and flawed science.
With Ken’s definitions, all paradoxes disappear and it can be explained via classical physics.
Cudos for being able to correct your self. It is the sign of true intelligence!
Are you saying there has been no scientific breakthroughs since Tesla? And are you saying that all of the universe can be explained from a classical physics perspective, completely negating all of quantum mechanics once Ken's theories on the dielectric field are integrated?
Even a working clock is broken twice a day.
How does that work out
Sorry, PW - but even after watching Veritasium's video (& only partially understanding it!) I still cannot shake my impression of Ken Wheeler as a word-salad-meister who deliberately sows confusion and complexity for the PRIMARY purpose of making himself appear as some highbrow scientific intellectual, when any genuine scientific objective would be to impart and share knowledge in the easiest and most practical manner! Ken utterly fails at this!
How about asking Veritasium for their opinion on Ken's explanations of electricity, dielectric and the ether??
Ken Wheeler is the leader of the Cult of Pseudoscience. End o' story.
Some people just don't understand satire very well.
@@maxine_q - Oh well, I guess he was just too good at it! As a Brit, I normally grasp irony and sarcasm almost instinctively - but this one just passed me by!!
@@markchip1 Have to agree, this one is not easy to see through.
It’s easy to understand what Ken says if you actually try to understand what he is saying. Who cares about big words, if your complaining about big words that’s shows your level of intelligence. If you really wanted to understand magnetism you would approach every theory with an open mind. Don’t negative criticize a man because you don’t understand what he is saying. Take the time to actually understand it
Got yer answers right here, me ol' Trout, all nice 'n' concise:
A1: Vegemite
A2: Sky hooks
A3: Timbits
Get it now? Of course you do.
You're welcome, eh?
I was waiting for the punch line 😳
Same though.
I thought his 3 questions were the punchline, no?
@@hewe4625 me too, are we wrong? Shit the bed are we the stoopid ones?🤣💕🖖
@@kevinscollan8293 🖖
@@kevinscollan8293yes
This video had me in tears. 😂
I fear the satire nature has slipped past far too many.
Dont pretend this is some avant garde trolling of his own audience. It's not. Who tf makes a video about how HOW Hitler isn't all bad because he was a vegetarian painter, while eating a bowl of sauerkraut? Nice try. He became an apologist for a provably unscientific cult leader, and talked me I to unsubbing all in one fell swoop. This is pandering to his trolls, nothing more.
@@UFOUAPMagnet and you seem to be too stupid to see what’s actually happening here. I pity you.
The people in these comments are so confused lol. And that can be the problem of satire itself: people miss that it's satire.
Especially you
What’s really funny is that P.W. actually had to make a follow up video explaining exactly what I said in my OP because some vocal individuals were just wanting it to be true so desperately.
But fortunately those few suffering from hollow head syndrome can repeat the idea of P.W. Being serious over and over all they want, but that doesn’t magically make their delusions a reality.
Astonishingly enough, it’s still missed by so many dense individuals because of the issues with the very nature of satirical content and the social adequacy’s required for cognitive comprehension.
But it still shouldn’t be an issue to anyone smarter than a house fly.
Wait a second, that's not humble pie you're eating there.
Ken blocks ANYONE that disagrees or questions him.
Question 1: All things in Spacetime are in contact with each other by being connected by the tensor field of SpaceTime itself, as characterized by Einstein. Imagine 1,000 corks floating in a swimming pool. They are connected by the tension of the water between them.
How can you prove that the corks are held together by surface tension? Have you tested this hypothesis, or can you cite any tests supporting this hypothesis?
@@Mike-bs5pi corks held together with surface tension-no
corks connected through surface tension- yes
considering this is a single water body, it must have a surface connecting all the corks, surface of water has surface tension idk then.
@@rainbowsquash673 false axioms like what? if A = B and B = C then A=C. Does this sound wrong to you? mathematics is built from the ground up using such axioms that are agreeable by everyone. Tell me one false axiom. If you want to believe that unicorns exist and shit rainbows then call it the truth throught "logic" by saying "its obvious brrrruh get smart lol dummy", then go ahead.
If a false explaination makes sense to you, sitting in your couch never actually going about to learn, then it doesnt mean its correct
That Ken Wheeler uses his "knowledge" to make youtube videos instead of turning it into millions of dollars / publishing papers on his views is most interesting to me.
Publishing peer-reviewed papers does not generate revenue. I published an Amazon #1 Best Seller in the Physics of Gravity, and I am far from wealthy. But, let me say to your point that he could perform experiments, test his theories, publish testable equations, or ANYTHING besides sitting on his Gold Bond zone and waxing condescending to the rest of us about what he supposedly knows.
@@UFOUAPMagnet Nicely put! He at least appears to subscribe to the Rush Limbaugh / Donald Trump model of ego comes first and foremost, truth and integrity somewhere far down the list. But that's just my opinion, no empirical evidence from experimentation or anything.
@@UFOUAPMagnet I agree, I think he is trying to help himself first. rather than publishing his experiments like you said it makes no f all money publishing papers.
Compared to being a UA-cam guru
In informal English the / can mean and/or. In this instance I meant or but I should have typed or instead of / as I see how confusing that was.
@@UFOUAPMagnet what books? i would love to read some and like different perspectives on physics
Way to handle the situation with poise and grace. Well done, sir!
Counterspace is a pretty flower that smells bad. Clear now?
Hmmm - ..... - ..yes! .. uh no!!
To clear up your third question. There is no negative dielectric pressure modifying the foil of counterspace. Keep in mind the net annular current flow is zero.
Net Current flow cannot be zero.
We constantly have emf’s being charged and discharged.
Through the aether From the original source of the perturbation, like a snake eating is own tail.
We have millions of tonnes of copper and iron deposits and millions of tonnes of molten ferrous magma moving past those deposits, creating a massive current flow which also causes a magnetic field.
Also the same for our oceans are one massive lord kelvin generator, salt water moving past large iron and copper deposits....
this is hilariously wrong
I have not fecking clue about anything you said, keep up the good work
Nor me. I do know that I love fluffy kittens though!
The verbal dielectric of your quantificable espousements are conflabitambly conflabulable with the flumpabulous ideology that Arkham’s quantable metric is indeed relevant when considering the umphet establishment of a slobalum hypothesis. Great video
Wait, what!!!! I think I've respawned into an alternate universe. 😱
Ben Eater has a fantastic series wherein he builds a computer from (electronic) scratch. I highly encourage anyone interested to check it out. He breaks it down logically, adding sensible functions only after the present functionality is fully understood and working.
Can definitely recommend. Ben Eater makes the best videos on basic computer architecture.
If im understanding your 1st Q.. Do you know what a fractal is ? Do you know what holography is? The aether is the point of complete rest. or pure Inertia it lies at the centre of all phenomena .. because it is counter spacial it has no fixed locus , no place in space.. so it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time.. Understanding the torus geometry and it's inverse geometry the hyperboloid you will understand the physical/ metaphysical universe we live in. The aether ( Dielectric) is the inverse of our 3d material existence (magnetism) and vice versa. You need to watch a lot of ken wheeler videos to familiarise yourself with words he uses but the Torus is all he is really talking about.
Ken loves talking bollocks, he loves using big words to talk bollocks, it's his thing.
I wish we talked like this in the States. I mean, I do, but no one gets it. It's pork pies in a bag of tripe, isn't it? He's havin a tin bath, takin the piss, sixes and sevens, a floppy Muppet. I get you bro. It's also total bloody bollocks,, mate. Crack on.
I disagree, I think the words matter, and seriously helps to understand what is actually happening, helps visualize too, just cuz your a dunce and dumbed down doesn't mean he should dumb it down for the rest of us!
Is he wrong though?
I've learnt more from Ken in a few years than my whole time at School and college.
@@AtommHD none of what you’ve learnt from him is correct though
Watch Eric Dollard's lectures on the history on electricity. They're freely available on UA-cam and cover everyone from Maxwell, Heaviside, Steinmetz etc etc and he defines counterspace, aether and dielectricity very well.
I’ll stick to lectures from people who know things
Say who I'll check it out
@@Emperorhirohito19272 those individuals are the Mt Rushmore on subject. I see you didn't wear boots today, that dog shit is quite engaging to scrub off XD
I thought the "ether" was disproved long ago. Am I missing something?
You are missing nothing.
"Disproved" isn't really a word we like to use - proofs are the domain of mathematics.
But yes, despite what the flat earth idiots think, the Michelson / Morely experiments failed to confirm the predictions made by the aether hypothesis. The aether is a discarded 19th century idea with no place in modern physics
@@drlegendre This comment baffles me. On one side it seems like a "critique". But it also seems like a person trying present themselves as intelligent but not quite getting there. Do you know what I mean?
I like to view the ether as a place holder word for a domain in which force and convergent vectors extrapolate energy
Ether was renamed “Nuetrinos” which have been proven to be in fact “Real” by CERN
“How does nothing within space itself touch every aspect of space.” Im not sure i quite understand your question. If I understand you correctly this is my answer. Space itself is not a thing, it has no properties, it is an absence. The Einstein idea that space and time can be bent or manipulated is utter nonsense and there is a simple analogy that proves this. If someone told you that you could take your shadow cast by the sun and nail it to a wall (like from peter pan) you would obviously say they were crazy. Although we name our shadow and in human language we speak as if its a actual thing, the reality is it is a privation, the absence of the phenomenon we call light. You can only “do” things to matter. You can bend a spoon, shatter a piece of glass, cut a piece of wood, you cant do that to a privation or the absence of stuff. Space is the absence of matter, shadow is the absence of light. The Aether is the only field that truly exists. Everything else is an expression of that field the same way water can be ice, liquid, or gas. Or how water can move as a longitudinal wave or a transverse one. The ways that the field is expressed create light, magnetism, electricity, gravity, etc. the field permeates everything and does not exist in what we would call conventional space. And the fact that these things are not physical makes it very difficult for the mind to wrap around. All we know and understand is the space inside of s box and the stuff inside of it. Eric P. Dollard explains these concepts i believe better than i can, and he also explains the concept of the electron, one in which the discoverers and engineers of the electrical world believed, which is that the electron is not s physicsl negatively charged ball orbiting an atom, but rather the end point of a line of force. Imagine the eraser end og s pencil being pressed into a piece of clothe , on the other side where you cannot see the pencil you find a raised area, a bump. For every piece of matter in existence, the Aether connects to it via lines of force, and the end points are called electrons. And a theory that was proposed at one point by i believe JJ Thompson was that some of the mass of objects is actually held in the Aether via this connection. And since static electricity as well as lightning is the result of lines of force snapping after a saturation event in the aether, its was theorized that if you could disconnect all of the lines of force from your body, you could accelerate and decelerate instantly. The example used was a car. Anyways i hope this answers your question, space has no properties, its a privation. And the Aether connects to all things on a molecular level via lines of force terminating in what we call electrons which do not have mass at rest.
While that's a fun and interesting thought, it's not a good claim without something to verify any aspect of it being true.
For example i can claim space is actually a rapidly flowing hyper light superfluous liquid that exerts great pressure when it's direction is challenged, forcing 'bubbles' of denser gases to bound together via buoyancy, which repel the liquid and form atmospheres and an escape from the crushing pressure. The pressure is still present though, and is being pushed from all sides as the liquid wraps around the sphere, causing a downwards pressure towards the centre of a sphere which is what modern science believe is gravity. But it's not mass pulling, it's liquid pushing from the outside.
That's the absolute undeniable truth - prove me wrong
@@MelodicTurtleMetal actually there is over 100 years of scientific research and experimentation for my theory. Nearly all the electrical engineers that came up with the math and inventions to harness electricity believed these things. So to your example. You couldnt say that your theory is true but you also believe Nasa who claims to send space craft into space and that space is not some light liquid. If your theory were true Nasa would have to no about it and engineer their spaceships around the problems caused by it. Likewise you can either believe the titans that developed electricity, or you can say they are all wrong. And it is my argument that they couldnt not have developed everything they did and simultaneously be wrong about how everything worked.
@@unshapingtheearth7916 i can say they are all wrong
einstein has been wrong
stephen hawkins
Nicola tesla
anyone you look up to has and we've proved them wrong mutiple time, yes they were right about what they proved, but were aslo wrong about many thing they couldnt prove. there's 200+ years of research regarding perpetual machine would you be willing to say the titans who though such a machine exists are wrong? smh
Eric p dollard explains this as well from an actual engineering perspective however he is a dinosaur in his field and pioneering highly theoretical works
One thing you can learn from people like Ken is that you have a lot of power yourself.
I really feel like you should wear a Rush shirt, preferably Permanent Waves
I think you've been watching too many videos on trap door spiders. But I've only been using my critical thinking skills to counter Ken Wheeler's claims, not my knowledge of electricity and magnetism which is not extensive.
aether is just a word . Penultimate of 100% nothing < penultimate of 100% something . < this sign is oversimplied . You would need greater then tetration since the..... Anyway you get the point
Veritasium was not entirely right, and deliberately left out important parts, especially when talking about DC As shown in his diagrams. He also left out I2R losses.
There is a spool of something like 38 miles of fibre at a trading exchange (IEX?) to slow down signaling.
Vintage oscilloscopes used coils of coax to delay signals enough for the horizontal trace to start for delayed trigger modes.
There may be something I'm not seeing here. I get induction and capacitive coupling - I need to watch Veritasium's video again.
@@johnnyragadoo2414 And in analog video camera (the spool of coax) and in analog reverb equipment. I think that the key point in coax, not single wire.
@@olivier2553 Interesting subject - it's pretty spooky that a time domain reflectometer can find a wire break.
Don't forget he said assume zero resistance in the wiring as if it were a superconductor. There was no reason to overcomplicate it by factoring in even more unknowns.
Yeah.. like deliberately missing proximity from his 1/c. It should have been 1m/c.. naughty boy
nice one jreg, you really showed those mathematicians who's physicist.
Ken Wheeler is a gifted man. His ideas are difficult to grasp at first, but once one's mind gets around initial skepticism everything kinda clicks. Then suddenly he makes more sense (by far) than other theories claiming things like "virtual photons". (Nonsense)
He certainly has a dizzying intellect.
I have followed KW since 2016. It has taken me years to not fully understand his alternative take on science. Now, coaxial light circuits seem far more feasible than virtual photons. Magnetism is less of a mystery. The guy is off the scale and can be entertaining too although he does get a lot of bad press...
@@craige7007 if had you actually studied it woudve made sense, you just want everything to be "it feels wrong so it must be", a good amount of modern quantum physics is very new and constantly evolving. We propose hypothesis and test them through research and experiments then throw out what fails, the models that are currently in use havent been disproven or are extremely accurate with most real world results. You have a model that works? tell us about it in standarized words and definitions, do some experiments, make predictions through it then well see if it holds up. The guy you believe is schizophrenic
Kruger, not Kurger!
Ken makes a science picture. His ferrocell explanations are completely wrong. Specular refraction was the cause I think? Just reflection stuff and not fields made visible.
I’ve been in invested in practicing a lot of engineering and studying scientific theory these last few years and all I can say is my opinion is that sometimes Ken Wheeler is right and sometimes he’s wrong. I have no clue whether he’s more wrong or more right but it’s just human nature to have misconceptions about some things. Many of his ideas I find very interesting and logical but I wish he provided more replicable proofs for his claims as there are many other supporting theories to combat his explanation and it’s hard to believe what you haven’t done and seen.
One thing I’ve invested a lot of time studying and I want to see Ken Wheeler’s take on is the electrolysis of H2O using DC current electrodes and caustic hydroxides as electrolyte. When I’ve performed this myself I produced hydrogen and oxygen gas, oxygen at the positive electrode, hydrogen at the negative electrode. I’ve been really trying to wrap my head as to why in H2O electrolysis, the paramagnetic O2 product and the diamagnetic H2 is produced at specific electrodes and how the gas molecules can travel to different electrodes through the water in order to separate.
For those who don’t know, H2O electrolysis is essentially just shearing apart water molecules into gaseous HHO rocket fuel using electricity. The HHO (H2 + O2) also burn together to form water (H2O). With a stoichiometric ratio of 2 mols of H2 and 1 mol of O2 the flame will burn at over 5,000° F and produce only pure water in the form of hot steam as a emission.
Ask Toyota.
Ken invented his own science. Easy tobe an expert when your the only one
Your kidding right? He's just building on top of Stinemitz, Tesla, Dollard
@@trexx32 the commentors of this channel know nothing ignore them
Is it April first in NZ?
So, here's a good method for establishing whether or not someone like Ken is actually correct with his assertions;
Has he actually published any official research on the topics he covers, and failing that is there any official research published by other sources which actually corroborates the claims he makes?
So far, the most I can find on him regarding published work is his book, which doesn't even come close to making him a credible source of scientific information. All this shows is that he's intelligent enough to mix actual facts with his BS to make it seem more credible.
Ken Wheeler is a pseudo- scientific propagandist, at large. Emphasis on large.
@@druidjackson527 Oh, btw you know who knows I am right about magnetism? Your buddy Ken. He literally wrote me and asked me for a copy of my #1 Amazon Best Seller in the Physics of Gravity. Boy, did you step on a landmine 👈🤣
@@UFOUAPMagnet you know it could be to use your theory like LEGO. It’s just one of the blocks.
Your so intellectually tied to your “#1” selling paper that your afraid to add to it, because it means it was only accurate based on the information you had available to you at the time.
Try and build on what you published don’t be afraid to says some areas of what you said is not quite accurate and needs improvement based on new information.
Don’t get stuck in your own information bias and a best selling high horse.
I think your a smart man, I wish you all the best
@@UFOUAPMagnet lol
@@vlogcity1111 x2 what an arrogant statement to make
Is it New Zealand's fool's day?
@Martin Major 😂 I'm just trying to figure out if this video is some sort of joke.
Clearly the issue is with how Ken presents it.
For instance, he has never addressed how waldorf chik'n elements interact with cruton crumbles or even how cole's slaw fields work to bind it all together.
Perhaps he should add some elements from Greek ideas and include how feta fro-mage introduction can add contrast to the bowl field.
He could use try less empasis on nockluu dressing, so people can actually see the hidden dissonace layers in his picked cherry medley function and could become aware of the false fairae structure underlying his work?
Lol, very Gouda.
Cheese! Now I'm hungry.
Let’s just make a Greek salad with some of that fillo pastry.
But seriously you guys could be making your own contributions to understanding of magnetic fields.
I think it’s easier to mock rather than clarify and build on a theory.
@@vlogcity1111 _But seriously you guys could be making your own contributions to understanding of magnetic fields_ - Oh no! got me there! If only someone actually did that for a living... oh wait...
So... where are your efforts?
@@FeCoNi_science why would I publish intellectual property that can be directly profited from.
The downfall of every inventor is trying to help too many people at once.
AB I suggest if you make any breakthrough inventions or applications of your theories, go to medium sized companies and leverage your intellectual property for a 5-25% share. Or a salary or lump sum and a share.
I’m not joking. You can’t help the world if your down an out yourself.
Edit: I’m not saying I don’t want to publish my results, I’m saying it is personal economic suicide if you publish a breakthrough you have not patented yet or are unable to get a patent.
People only freely publish results
That do not affect their personal finances negatively.
You see AB there is a lot of economic incentive behind your education. Or education by omission which is what it really is.
Try and look past all the economic bias of the information your were taught......energy is a trillion dollar industry.
Have you tried inviting him on for a conversation to flesh out these ideas and raise any objections you have?
So I guess this from sciencing....c.....o.......m isn't a thing? "In one ampere of current, 6.242 × 10 to the 18th electrons are flowing every second. Multiply the strength of the current by this number to find the number of electrons flowing in the circuit per second."
Electrons are flowing, it's just that the device doesn't consume electrons.
Dafuq???
being wrong and admiring it is how we keep leaning...when you know it all...theres nothing left to learn:)
It's really simple the magnetic divergence of the dialectric inertial plain manifests itself is in a counterspacial toroidal hyperbolic modality. These convergent tangential conjugate counterspacial toruses spin at the inverse of counterspacial Flux acceleration giving the hyperbolic toroidal conjugate spheroid it's rotating coaxial.
lol, this guy gets it. Though you could at least address his questions. 😅 Ether is akin to the Higgs field. It’s like describing a field and needs no modality aside from maybe a spatial coordinate system. As for the symmetry of the dielectric and gravity - they are geometrically equivalent and they follow the same principle of force vectors gravity and magnetism actually at singularities like black hole material is ejected in hyperbolic geometry as the frequency of all attracted perturbations are accelerated to the point that the mass dynamos are ejected - reentering spatial ether as fresh elements of hydrogen and different arrangements of matter
Just woke up. I'm going to have to watch again to sort out if this is a joke or a real apology. KW always seemed like he was spewing trash to me. Did he have real things to say?
"Did [KW] have real things to say?" We may never be certain. We do know he had a perturbation in the toroidal dielectric. With therapy and the latest anti-flatulence medication he's expected to make some kind of recovery. The rest of us, well, we may never recover.
In short, NO. I have an extensive and more highly regarded body of work on the subject of magnetism, and I can assure you that he is the road to ruin. It's a cult of pseudo science, with principles of magnetism borrowed from people like myself. I am a rebel of mainstream academia, but I am still scientific about it, and speak in plain terms. If you can't say it simply, you dont know what you're talking about.
@@UFOUAPMagnet check out
The good vibrations on UA-cam. Let me know if you have seen his experiments on gravity and magnetism
The problem with luminipherous ether is not that it's inconsistent. It just failed to be observed, whereas the competing theory of special relativity was indeed verified time and time again. It's good to learn about these old theories, and there is value in that but do keep in mind that theories mean nothing without experiment. Experiments have killed the ether, and validated special relativity.
We are not talking about that model of the Aether, this is a different model. Hence why you think still believe in spacetime and relativity.
Well since light slows down and accelerates in different mediums, it can only be a wave. A wave of what? Of the aether.
I mean to get away from all irony, that is the only logical explanation, unlike the mental gymnastics of what they try to tell you now
It makes more sense that the theory of relativity is a metaphor. It makes more sense it is describing the effects of aether on light etc., that it is a field phenomena. What is omitted from the theory of relativity is how space and time are warped, ie, since space is essentially nothing, how do you warp nothing? Or time? Time is motion of particles in space. How is the warping of time accomplished?
@@gerretw space-time is not nothing. It is space-time. When you're in motion with respect to me, I see your clock ticking slower, and I see your length contacted. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that.
@@DarklightSpirit it's a wave of the electromagnetic field.
I hope that was a joke, because if not, I'm genuinely worried. Are you feeling OK?
Oh thank f#@& I'm not the only one thinking that
You guys are the children!
afraid to admit he was more intellectual integrity than you do. To admit faults and move forward with learning is as SANE as it gets.
This is hilarious to think it’s better to move
Forward like a horse with blinders on
@@vlogcity1111 you must love a bowl of word salad for lunch 🥗
@@andma5117 I actually really dislike the taste of salad. ;)
@@vlogcity1111 word salad, not salad salad.
If I'd know the subject of this video before watching, I'd have bought some ham and salad cream to go with that word salad!
01:10 Is that how _Kruger_ is pronounced?
It is if you're from New Zealand, apparently. He does it a few times :-)
@@dnomyarnostaw
I didn't think it was just that - but thanks. ;)
Ask him if he's like to go eat out on the deck...
It's on purpose. In a "debate" he had with a flatard named Jason, said flatard called it Dunning-Kerger.
Planarwalk did a highlights video on 10th of March, and the gaffe occurs at about 14:46 in the video.
He's even sported a Dunning-Kerger tee in a vid or 2, including "Flat Earther Tries To Prove Flat Earth With An Encyclopedia"
Just saying for those who haven't seen some of Planarwalk's past videos.
@@hewe4625 Ooooooooh! An IN Joke! Thats funny 🙂
Ken Wheeler is actually Eric Cartman in reality.
Remarkable. This comment section still has people that miss the joke. In case it wasn't clear from the absolute nonsense... and the fact that he made a clarification video about it: This is trolling you Ken Wheeler fans.
lmao they wont get it, really tells how smart they are with their annular dielectric shits
There is smart folk that do not agree with Veritasium and even some debunk videos that make experiments that show that it is kind of true but not 100 % true, so do not fall for the trap of saying something is true just for one smart source did say so.
When folk start to talk about gravity and magnetism, and electric universe it is always good to be sceptical, at least when they use language that is hard to understand and sound super complicated, for the simple truth is that we do not understand how gravity works, we do not even fully understand the electrons or the "spooky action at a distance", when it come to Veritasium thought experiment it is an hypothesis and not a explanation how it work.
Counterspace!
I have seen some follow-up videos that investigated further into the claims made in the Vetitasium video. One was ElectroBOOM that made a simulation model, and another guy (forgot the channel's name) that made a physical experiment with parallel wires. Both showed that the current transmitted between the wires was mininal
Unfortunately Electro boom has demonstrated that he hasn't got the slightest understanding of the physics behind it. Wrong right hand, no understanding, why the Poynting has to point to the power source, wrong model and so on.
That's a question of the size and distance of the conductors. You can dimension them in a way that the lamp actually lights up somewhat immediately and does not burn out once the wave travelled the conductor and back.
Fun fact: From the guy with the wires in the field you can calculate the wire gauge used from the current and voltage readings.
Planarwalk is never wrong !
It was only a little refraction !
checks out. My polar diagonal ratios match what Ken has been saying as well.
This is so rare, I really respect this.
Solid move, and a good look.
im glad you finaly came to terms with your own ignorance and could accept and learn from it. few people can do that now days. ego ran world.the science community was created with different terminolgy and fields for the same things to keep people divided and confused and only be able to create what the gov wants you to.
Reading through the comments a couple months later I'm a bit disappointed
“Dude that’s never heard of steinmetz debunks the dielectric field” lmao
Even though Ken is somewhat critical of Walter Russell, I do think reading his book "the secret of light" can help one wrap their mind around the questions you're asking in this video.
It would be a hard read for an atheist, yet I would still suggest they set their assumptions aside enough to understand that the book is about physics.
Well done, Sir. You seem to be a truly scientific person and a decent guy.
Well played sir, well played.
Knowing the words and phrases can make you sound authorative and knowledgeable. Stay on a specially crafted script and you are pretty bulletproof against anyone who has no special understanding. However get pulled off script and people without true understanding quickly reveal it. Unfortunately I have no special understanding and I found the idea of the energy flowing through the field rather than the wires uncomfortable. I am fine with the idea of the particle having charge that generates a field that can effect the field generated by another particle and so pass energy through the interaction of the two fields. It seemed Veritasium went further than that so I wish you well and hope you can explain it to us . . . eventually.
Lol this is natural laws, not something for your comfort. Lol.
What about energy flowing through a field instead of flowing through a wire makes you uncomfortable?
@@michael-bell Why doesn't the energy flow without the help of matter? We see matter in the form of wires and other physical components manipulate the field. We see matter affected by the field. Saying the energy is flowing through the field rather than the matter seems to run counter to my experience.
I feel like whatever this is, it’s going over my head. I know you can’t mean that KW is actually right, but finding it tough to find the satire/facetiousness key phrases… I’m not sure what it is I’m missing here, so help me out.
Counterspace.
Counter space is the space between or within a defined threshold. The easiest way of conceptualising it is that counter space is the space between two points on a ruler.
@@harryjester282 counter space is the space between the sink and the stove that allows the semiotics of relativized formalisms to fully counter the space
@@PplsChampion counterspace is the space where bank tellers count the money
Yeah he’s the smartest human alive obviously 😇🙏🐶🐾🐣💙🏡🌲
That is some delicious looking salad. Word salad. I see what you did there.
That was my point on your other video. Ken Wheeler seems to go out of his way to get and make things sound more complex than they really are. He could actually explain it simply the way Derek (Veritasium) does. Ken puts a lot of effort into sounding smart and complex, whether he is right or wrong.
Another point, this is a perfect example of why science will always win over religion or conspiracies like flat earth. When presented with new information, science adapts. It's okay to be wrong because that means you're learning something new.
I explain some things and describe others depending on audience
I don't think he goes out of his way. I just think that's who he is. Him going out of his way to be more complex is just you projecting don't you think?
On your point around science, I don’t completly agree. Science SHOULD adapt to new information, but for reasons even showcased with this Ken Wheeler ’conflict’ facts in themselves are not enough. Either you lack enough understanding to be willing to accept what the facts might mean, or you lack the proper framework to understand them in the right way, which leads to scientists not adapting (even to what is ultimately true).
There is also the second factor of scientists having strong egos and an ’expert’ position based on their knowledge that many won’t give up easily, making quite few budge to new/alternative facts.
So to see science as only objective is very far from reality, it faces very similar biases as for example religion.
@@_VISION. You saying I'm projecting is just you projecting, don't you think?
@@ScottyHugefellow Semantics, I suppose.
Flat Earth confirmed! I knew it ;)
Just kidding.
Just me, or does P-walk look a bit like a young Brian Eno these days!
dis is gonna be interrrresting.
That's way over my head! Boy am I glad that the Newtonian approximations work just fine!
I can't answer your questions, since my questions are radically different. Just keep on trying
How can he be right he believes in the globe
i sincerely hope this is satire. it feels like it, but i was waiting for the reveal at the end and none came. also "kerger"??
it is satire
@@nocbvideos6458 yep i went and checked his later video to find it lmao. i only found his channel like 3 vids before this so i was like "no way this smart dude turned around"
@@ayooobro Dunning and Kerger :D
That veritassium video was terrible, very misleading. If you have any questions feel free to hit me up. I'm a third year physics student.
There is no aether, this is the most famous null result in all of experimental physics.
you asked , in short .ken says : Philosophical pressure mediation . Virtual .or not . Everything work this way . He does not say philosophically because it would be wrongly understood . Copilot understand this very concily
Dude.... I bet this comment section is making you cry xD
This is similar to the Einstein vs Newton farce. Heaviside simplified Maxwell's equations from about 20 down to 4 to end up with simple algebra for everyday situations. Similar to using F=ma instead of the tensors of Einstein's field equations . Everything, including electromagnetism is far more complicated in reality, but for most cases, a simplified version suffices by neglecting variables of small significance under the circumstances. So, you are welcome to use the calculus line integrals, gradient and curls to calculate electric fields for all situations or just use the simple algebraic ones like you were probably taught at school. Ken Wheeler just takes the complicated formulae and explanations and dresses them up with his own word salad to sound important. So Planarwalk, what you were taught was not wrong for everyday steady state use, but would probably only be so under, for instance, transient conditions.
If you formulate Maxwells eqs in à Clifford Algebra you get One equation del F=J
It's a bit like Ohm's law. V=iR is only true for a perfect conductor. As soon as there is current flowing heating takes place and numbers start to change but for everyday use Ohm's law is good enough for practical considerations.
@@martinconnelly1473 Indeed. Also, F=ma is only true if the mass remains constant. With a rocket, the mass is rapidly changing from burning fuel. More correct becomes F=d mV/dt = m dV/dt +V dm/dt.
@@martinconnelly1473 V=iR is still true, it's just that R changes with temperature. And sometimes that's very useful, for example for making temperature sensors.
He may be correct but that's not the same as being right 😁
BOOM 💥 thats what I'm saying
Well done. There is no shame in admitting you are wrong especially when you turn shame into pride by admitting that you now understand. The reason that a dunning Kruger affect happens is because of what we call beliefs. Beliefs happen when people take information they hope is true and want it to be true and they turn their thoughts into reality in their own mind. After people convince themselves that the thoughts they had in their mind are true then this becomes their reality even though outside their mind in the real world it is not true. This applies to everything. People form beliefs about science and religion and viruses and cures for those viruses. People want their thoughts and beliefs to be true so they cause them to become true in their own mind.
Hahahahaha reading these replies really make my day
Is this irony? Sarcasm? An act?
Dielectric pressure need to be higher in silicon then in silver
1st question would be answered by Euclidean geometry and henri poincare’s disk model of projective geometry (counter space or the ether is like a projective accretion disk and space is an after effect) this would be a reason why the hypertrocoid and hyperboloid are overly stated
I didn't catch the background on all this although I think I saw something by Wheeler well over a year ago. But if he's espousing hypotheses that contradict peer reviewed, published, mainstream science (he was a year ago), then he needs to get his stuff peer reviewed and published before it's deserving of much attention.
It's like those Flat Earthers who ignore atmospheric refraction. I tell them, "Look, if you get your atmospheric refraction ideas peer reviewed and published, and the US military and the telecommunications industries incorporate your work into their training and design manuals, then I'll give you the time of day. Until then I can't be bothered."
Peer reviews mean absolutely nothin! Other than you appeal to authority and know how to word your theory to appeal to a broader intellect. It means you have to dilute your theory to only move the status quo forward two inches.
Rather than blast through the generally accepted rubbish passed as degrees in academia today. You need to appease them...
Again peer reviews mean bollocks
@@vlogcity1111 That's right. All the newest and most important science is published on youtube these days.
@@teddansonLA hahaha fortunately for you it is.
Unfortunately you choose to appeal to authority rather than authenticity and knowledge.
Not sure if your comment was intended to be sarcasm as it’s hard to detect if you have autism and even harder over a text comments.
Where have I appealed to authority? I can't see that in my comment.
_Not sure if your comment was intended to be sarcasm_
Well then you are stupider than you appeared at first.
_rather than authenticity and knowledge_
Ken Wheeler has almost no knowledge of electricity or magnetism. He's a crank, at best.
What knowledge do you have? Science doesn't understand gravity. Then you have to define which gravity you're talking about. Newtonian gravity, Einsteinian gravity, or any of the other gravity theories out there. Gravity is not understood and Scientists are still trying to work it out
Talk to AB Science... He'll clear it up for you! Magnetism is his thing! It's part of his PhD work...