WATCH: Protestors and police clash on college campus | LiveNOW from FOX
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 кві 2024
- Pro-Palestine protestors on the campus of USC in Los Angeles are confronted by police on Wednesday morning. Law enforcement ended the demonstration after a scheduled speech was disrupted.
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! ua-cam.com/users/livenowfox?su...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
None of those students know anything about politics unfortunate
Tax dollars are paying for their student loans....😂
Funny part is they have no idea what they’re protesting none !!
They are protesting for peace. It’s like the simplest thing.. maybe you’re confused with their protesting.
@@Hezekiah1 more like protesting for control and fear. they are all cowards ironically.
@@Hezekiah1they are not promoting peace when they are attacking Jewish students or anyone who does not agree with them!
With violence? @@Hezekiah1
@@Sunshinebabe110I agree this isn't peaceful at all.
Immigration madness
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country.
Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime:
1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government.
2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies.
3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions.
4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa.
5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism.
It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share.
Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent.
Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis.
Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday.
The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.
It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.
Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers.
Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera.
Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel.
"No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused.
"This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said.
More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV.
Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community.
"The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said.
And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera.
"Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said.
"It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry."
Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections.
"This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said.
"Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job."
A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes.
From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy.
From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
@@thed3008 some of us work for generations
Obama started all this hate
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country.
Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime:
1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government.
2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies.
3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions.
4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa.
5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism.
It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share.
Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent.
Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis.
Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday.
The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.
It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.
Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers.
Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera.
Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel.
"No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused.
"This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said.
More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV.
Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community.
"The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said.
And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera.
"Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said.
"It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry."
Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections.
"This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said.
"Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job."
A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes.
From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy.
From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
Nice try wht devil
The first bigot in charge
8 years late pal
Trump is Pro-Israel. Just remember that when you vote.
Our government let all this crazy people in to the country.
Send them to Tel Aviv. Let them go protest the IDF over there.
They’re already all protesting over there, dude.. they’re literally protesting themselves there right now.
No send the to Palestine
Or send the Ashkenazi Pilgrims back to Europe.
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country.
Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime:
1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government.
2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies.
3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions.
4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa.
5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism.
It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share.
Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent.
Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis.
Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday.
The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.
It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.
Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers.
Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera.
Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel.
"No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused.
"This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said.
More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV.
Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community.
"The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said.
And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera.
"Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said.
"It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry."
Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections.
"This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said.
"Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job."
A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes.
From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy.
From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
@@bartmanxoxo you’re obviously lost dude.. everyone in the world would love to visit Palestine.. you guys destroyed it though. Duh…
No truth no nation no freedom
Democracy at its best 😂
🔵 🕳️
So sad this division between our young adults.shameful
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country.
Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime:
1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government.
2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies.
3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions.
4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa.
5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism.
It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share.
Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent.
Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis.
Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday.
The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.
It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.
Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers.
Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera.
Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel.
"No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused.
"This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said.
More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV.
Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community.
"The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said.
And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera.
"Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said.
"It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry."
Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections.
"This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said.
"Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job."
A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes.
From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy.
From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
Where are the water cannons? Those protestors look thirsty.
It's alarming that someone has a dog in the crowd!!
Trump 2024
If they had MAGA hats on they'd sure as hell stop it & start congressional hearings.
Oh yea but you aren’t allowed to love America anymore only allowed to chant death to America, f them people !!!
Get the batons out.
Don’t mess with Texas
You're government leaders love this. "A HOUSE divided cannot Stand!
Heaven forbid that there is a medical emergency or some kind of fire on campus.
Send new National Guard already get out the tear gas
Who is the parents of those kids are they the same
We used to ship all these protesters to Nam and they are still in the jungle.
FUSC
First wave !’ First wave !’ Protect the horses !’ Stand with our Allie’s.
Nice spelling 😅
Hello Scuffel? Thats called assualt on a peace officer!
Repercussions of Muslim Migrants.
Israel 🇮🇱 you are not alone, we stand with you 🇮🇱🙏🇮🇱🇮🇱🙏❤️
Not all of us...not with Palestine, Isreal, Ukraine, Russia, China, Mexico..only stand with America, well have if it....if not, I don't care..
I think Israel should say "Give all the hostages back and we will end this war". Enough people have died.
It is the LAW !! THE LAW
I see students pushing more
That's nothing
Marshal Law🤷🏽♂️
Get rid of those ‘ALUMNI’ license plate frames people! These clowns will make you their target 😂
Expel them! Then maybe they'll wake up! Grow up kids!!
Not so peaceful, huh?
Free college looks fun
KENT STATE NOT AGAIN !
madness in the US Universoties
I just look forward to the day Yahyah is made accountable.
Who is Biden?? ,an American or Islamic??😅😅😅
Mulțumesc frumos. 😮
I believe something is else causes this
Look at all the republicans getting all nostalgic for kent state
Israel help will put Braiden in truble
Look, we appreciate that Americans live their "freedoms" but we are at war with Hamas ISIS and your relationship with us in Israel is more important than your democratic freedoms. It's just how it is. We do appreciate your compliance though 🇮🇱🇺🇸
Obiden
God bless Israel! 😊
😮❤
At any moment one of those protesters could take a law enforcement officer’s gun!
🍕
Go protesters! We love you!
Shame of you USA!