The White Western Star can also carry medium logs without a trailer (maybe not when this video was made), you can also combine the medium log carrier with log trailer and carry 2x medium logs with it. Of course it will barely get out of its own way due to the terrible P2W ratio of that truck. I think the Azov 6 can drag the white faster than the White can drive itself up a hill with a full load of logs haha. Of course the Azov 6 despite not having a great P2W on paper can basically pull anything with its super low gearing.
The Medium Log Carrier was not a thing until Phase 6 (Maine DLC). Medium Logs are far less annoying now that it doesn't require either a trailer or Cat 745C specifically. Hallelujah really 😆
Another great piece of content, thank you so much for this video too (and for the one on the tires, and...) 🙂 I have one residual question, though. It seemed to me at some point you were suggesting that the right question is not "what engine should I install on my truck), but rather: what is the best truck for my job? Which, in my interpretation of your words, could be chosen by adding to the weight of the truck-without-wheels the weight of everything else we need like, for instance: the wheels, the boardbed, the cargo for the bed, the small crane, the empty trailer, the full trailer. I know that combining everything would result in an unmanageable sheet, but at least, do we have the single weights to add? Wheels, beds, trailers, cargo? Thanks 🙂
Wheel & Frame Add-ons (for carrying cargo) usually make up a small portion of a truck's total mass. I won't go as far as to say they are negligible (especially for light trucks), but they will not affect the viability of truck setups in most cases. The mass of the truck body will always make up anywhere from "most" to "almost all" of the total mass (perhaps with only the exception of the Fuel Tank, which is a bad idea for almost any purpose😆😆). As for Trailers & the cargo themselves - please see links below. Those posts are old, and newer things like the Medium Logging Frame are missing, but they are the only compiled data in accessible form (I assume you can't be bothered to skim the game files yourself lol). Tbh Trailers are a topic that deserves it's own video, which I have yet to gotten to making (I dropped off from Snowrunner for a while 😅). I assume it's coming if SR continues to hold my interest like it has for the past 3 years. Trailers Mass Chart: preview.redd.it/v73zjzrc4cf61.jpg?width=884&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=9d21d32d6e840786a85e03af5d758afdab424843 Cargo Mass Chart:preview.redd.it/kf5zba2rsaj61.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=88b5683d629e9ec81ed22d749eecf6947120852e
Wondering if it's really necessary to put all the stronger engines with massive fuel consumption on every truck. Yeah, I understand that more power can be better but now that we are getting more wider maps with less fuel depots available maybe it would be nice to re-evaluate the usefulness of mid tier or even stock engines? Some times I feel that all those engines are not there just for show.
Might also make for less scout trucks flipped on roof. I know the CK is a handful with 39in tires and the 5.2 engine. The scout 800 is barely driveable with the stock engine + lift haha
That azov with the super low front bumper that just gets jammed on everything and slows the truck down is not one I'm gonna get. This game benefits from trucks with high overhang or and axle protecting bumper if available, but I see some people use this truck and it's always the same just problems with the low front.
What would u recommend for the CK1500 scout in Hard mode? With how fast u can get the "best" engine is it worth equiping that in Hard mode when fuel cost money and u would reduce its range with higher fuel consumption. I have seen a few videos saying that it is better to keep the standard engine for lower fuel consumption over the added power but i am still not sure what to go for.
I wonder if the lower spec engine might also help make the CK less of a dune buggy once you get 39in mudders on it. With the 5.2 it is quite a handful and very easy to roll on the big mud tires. I have definitely heard it is often best to stay with the base engine in hard mode since you have to make every drop of fuel count, at least for scouts.
We all forget about The weight of truck wich give grip, i drive pacific p16 with only diff lock on & excelent tires, so good grip, but its weight give us some good grip, even he have an A for p2w, so That is only informative
Towing Power to weight Means nothing Take my semi for example 80,000lbs… 450hp… 1,000tq It comes down to gearing among other qualities Like my truck literally does 5mph in 1st gear… I climb MOUNTAINS in 8th-9th-10th at 35-50mph…. Gearing in fact is a torque multiplier so it doesn’t matter if you have a heavy truck that makes 100tq, you gear it low enough it could apply 1,000tq to the ground Hence why the off-road gearbox and fine tuned box are the superior transmissions in mudrunner:))))
@@FireflyOnUA-cam, I've tried to post a Reddit link to my engine stats spreadsheet, but every time UA-cam was deleting my comment. Are the links forbidden?
@@vladvulcan It might be links. Although it is strange that I can't see the message - because if something gets auto-deleted I should be able to see it. I know that youtube doesn't allow for certain types of links like file hosting sites (which could be used for illicit activity etc.). I know this because I used one in my description once and got a community strike😲
Actually, you are oversimplifying. There are other engine parameters that matter, including durability and tied to it - critical damage threshold, damaged fuel consumption and damaged torque penalty. The trend is that the crazy one-off superpowerful engines not only get higher torque and fuel consumption, but also much less durability and lower damage threshold.
I am simplifying, particularly because durability & fuel consumption matters little outside of Hard Mode, at least for the way I've seen most people play. Yes it creates a "difference" but I have never been able to justify picking a less-powerful engine due to durability or fuel consumption. Have you? (outside Hard Mode)
@@FireflyOnUA-cam I have. When it's about LAZ-6 TA240 for old Russian trucks, or the Si-8v 2850 Tc for new Western Stars, I usually install the previous ones, because they are much more reliable. Only switching to the top ones when I need that power boost (logging?) or am going for a short trip where durability doesn't matter.
Such an underrated channel. Really great work on all the snowrunner content.
Thanks!
Always good to see the game stats behind everything, thank you for making this!
Thx for watching!
Smart man, with detail sens.
Thanks dude, glad you appreciate it.
Shame I don’t understand but I’m sure it’s pretty interesting video like and other. Thanks for you content for people!
The White Western Star can also carry medium logs without a trailer (maybe not when this video was made), you can also combine the medium log carrier with log trailer and carry 2x medium logs with it. Of course it will barely get out of its own way due to the terrible P2W ratio of that truck. I think the Azov 6 can drag the white faster than the White can drive itself up a hill with a full load of logs haha. Of course the Azov 6 despite not having a great P2W on paper can basically pull anything with its super low gearing.
The Medium Log Carrier was not a thing until Phase 6 (Maine DLC). Medium Logs are far less annoying now that it doesn't require either a trailer or Cat 745C specifically. Hallelujah really 😆
Another great piece of content, thank you so much for this video too (and for the one on the tires, and...) 🙂
I have one residual question, though. It seemed to me at some point you were suggesting that the right question is not "what engine should I install on my truck), but rather: what is the best truck for my job? Which, in my interpretation of your words, could be chosen by adding to the weight of the truck-without-wheels the weight of everything else we need like, for instance: the wheels, the boardbed, the cargo for the bed, the small crane, the empty trailer, the full trailer. I know that combining everything would result in an unmanageable sheet, but at least, do we have the single weights to add? Wheels, beds, trailers, cargo?
Thanks 🙂
Wheel & Frame Add-ons (for carrying cargo) usually make up a small portion of a truck's total mass. I won't go as far as to say they are negligible (especially for light trucks), but they will not affect the viability of truck setups in most cases. The mass of the truck body will always make up anywhere from "most" to "almost all" of the total mass (perhaps with only the exception of the Fuel Tank, which is a bad idea for almost any purpose😆😆).
As for Trailers & the cargo themselves - please see links below. Those posts are old, and newer things like the Medium Logging Frame are missing, but they are the only compiled data in accessible form (I assume you can't be bothered to skim the game files yourself lol).
Tbh Trailers are a topic that deserves it's own video, which I have yet to gotten to making (I dropped off from Snowrunner for a while 😅). I assume it's coming if SR continues to hold my interest like it has for the past 3 years.
Trailers Mass Chart: preview.redd.it/v73zjzrc4cf61.jpg?width=884&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=9d21d32d6e840786a85e03af5d758afdab424843
Cargo Mass Chart:preview.redd.it/kf5zba2rsaj61.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=88b5683d629e9ec81ed22d749eecf6947120852e
Wondering if it's really necessary to put all the stronger engines with massive fuel consumption on every truck. Yeah, I understand that more power can be better but now that we are getting more wider maps with less fuel depots available maybe it would be nice to re-evaluate the usefulness of mid tier or even stock engines? Some times I feel that all those engines are not there just for show.
For scouts, i prefer stock or second engine, because fuel means more, trucks, all the way on torque.
Might also make for less scout trucks flipped on roof. I know the CK is a handful with 39in tires and the 5.2 engine. The scout 800 is barely driveable with the stock engine + lift haha
Another great video. I don't see a link in the description
It's there, at the very top. Here you go: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12zWGPyhh32xC7f9n2dKh35yST0Lt4jX-NmK7xQp7Ob0/edit#gid=1015917062
Thanks, must be how it's displayed on my tablet.
That azov with the super low front bumper that just gets jammed on everything and slows the truck down is not one I'm gonna get. This game benefits from trucks with high overhang or and axle protecting bumper if available, but I see some people use this truck and it's always the same just problems with the low front.
If you mean the Azov 73210, I've just unlocked the active suspension upgrade, can't wait to see how this changes the performance of this truck.
What would u recommend for the CK1500 scout in Hard mode? With how fast u can get the "best" engine is it worth equiping that in Hard mode when fuel cost money and u would reduce its range with higher fuel consumption. I have seen a few videos saying that it is better to keep the standard engine for lower fuel consumption over the added power but i am still not sure what to go for.
If you are worried, stick with the stock engine. 30k torque is sufficient to move the Chevy anyways.
I wonder if the lower spec engine might also help make the CK less of a dune buggy once you get 39in mudders on it. With the 5.2 it is quite a handful and very easy to roll on the big mud tires. I have definitely heard it is often best to stay with the base engine in hard mode since you have to make every drop of fuel count, at least for scouts.
We all forget about The weight of truck wich give grip, i drive pacific p16 with only diff lock on & excelent tires, so good grip, but its weight give us some good grip, even he have an A for p2w, so That is only informative
Towing
Power to weight
Means nothing
Take my semi for example
80,000lbs… 450hp… 1,000tq
It comes down to gearing among other qualities
Like my truck literally does 5mph in 1st gear… I climb MOUNTAINS in 8th-9th-10th at 35-50mph….
Gearing in fact is a torque multiplier so it doesn’t matter if you have a heavy truck that makes 100tq, you gear it low enough it could apply 1,000tq to the ground
Hence why the off-road gearbox and fine tuned box are the superior transmissions in mudrunner:))))
Why every my comment gets deleted??
What lol? I just got on now to respond to you. I can see them all from here nothing has been deleted....
@@FireflyOnUA-cam, I've tried to post a Reddit link to my engine stats spreadsheet, but every time UA-cam was deleting my comment. Are the links forbidden?
@@vladvulcan It might be links. Although it is strange that I can't see the message - because if something gets auto-deleted I should be able to see it.
I know that youtube doesn't allow for certain types of links like file hosting sites (which could be used for illicit activity etc.). I know this because I used one in my description once and got a community strike😲
noice
Actually, you are oversimplifying. There are other engine parameters that matter, including durability and tied to it - critical damage threshold, damaged fuel consumption and damaged torque penalty. The trend is that the crazy one-off superpowerful engines not only get higher torque and fuel consumption, but also much less durability and lower damage threshold.
I am simplifying, particularly because durability & fuel consumption matters little outside of Hard Mode, at least for the way I've seen most people play. Yes it creates a "difference" but I have never been able to justify picking a less-powerful engine due to durability or fuel consumption. Have you? (outside Hard Mode)
@@FireflyOnUA-cam I have. When it's about LAZ-6 TA240 for old Russian trucks, or the Si-8v 2850 Tc for new Western Stars, I usually install the previous ones, because they are much more reliable. Only switching to the top ones when I need that power boost (logging?) or am going for a short trip where durability doesn't matter.
Way too little views on this channel...
haha thanks lol
RETIRED ?
Rogue assault.
Yeah... too much grind :(
@@FireflyOnUA-cam Oh... you are great player!!
;-(