If Radovid wasnt made to be such madman, this union of the thrones would make the north very powerful,and with the inclusion of Kaedwen would basically form a almost united northern empire.
@Haljordan4life Everything about that questline ended badly, Radovid should be a power hungry zealot, not mad. And Djikstra shouldn't spring his trap with Geralt present.
@Haljordan4life He's not even that power hungry, he just seized opportunity with the north in disarray but I'd say Henselt is a much more agressive expansionist, Radovid tried things in a more subtle manner and I doubt Kings like Foltest wouldn't have done otherwise given the chance.
So sad for Roche. To save Temeria, it's either to sell your princess and soul to Radovid (TW2 here), or to sell your sovereign and soul to Emyr (TW3 siding with him). To save motherland, one must sell part of it, pure tragedy.
@@Matt-bg5wg I’m going to sacrifice him to make dijkstra King I think this will be the best choice Nilfgaard don’t deserve to be on top I hate them even more then I hated Radovid (I was only playing TW3 before)
Actually I learned recently that if Adda is alive Radovid implies Anais will simply stay in Tretogor with her half-sister (and probably be married off to some other high-standing noble Redanian) then when she comes of age she can return to Temeria to be the queen. He says "My future Bride" in this video which is only something he says if Adda isn't alive from Witcher 1.
@@HEKVT It's funny considering the "War Recap" scene in Witcher 3 does account for your Henselt choice but nothing else as far as I know. I'm going to do a save import with this choice to see whether there is any difference. I doubt many people have footage considering you can't choose this outcome if you Simulate a save (Natalis is just the default)
@@TaxFraudTutorials Mhm, I started W3 before the other 2, then played them, I did a save from W1 with neutral ending where I spared Siegried and Yaevinn, as well as curing Adda again - in Witcher 2 it counted Siegfried as dead and Adda alive, and I did the Iorveth ending - in Witcher 3 I'm going to do a NG+ and import the save from that but I think the only change that will occur is Geralt having the tattoo, and Letho being alive.
@@individumm5366 Too bad that it possibly was too difficult to add him into the game. I mean what could be his purpose? The Temerian Guerillas are under Roches command, most of the deserters under the Baron... there is just no place for him where he could fit in well in the story. But thats a shame, i like Natalis. But on the other hand, i wouldn't want to see a broken Natalis in some stinking hole in Velen.
@2x11 Nickname It is possible... But you can survive a losing battle without being a coward. There are other ways to fight Nilfgaard, not only the guerilla-warfare of Roche. He could be in another Nothern Kingdom. But who knows. I hope he is alive
This is objectively the best outcome for anais herself. If Adda is alive, she's with her half-sister, and in the Capitol of Redania, far from the harm that she'd be in with Natalis and his civil war, she'd be a target for assassination's. If you gave her to Natalis she's probably dead by the time Witcher 3 rolls around whereas I can buy the idea of her at least surviving if she went with Radovid.
The lack of a mention in TW3 leads me to believe that Anias is probably still alive. I don't see why Radovid would kill Anias, anyway, since depending on the ending of TW2, he may have had Anias in his possession in the first place and was his link to the Temerian throne. Still, even if she was given to Natalis, it would be strange that she and Jon Natalis have disappeared for some silly reason. Odd how the so-called greatest military mind in the north just vanishes with the heir to Temeria. i mean I find the idea that he's hiding Anais more plausible although all this is mostly my take on it and not based on any solid factual grounding.
Know I’m late to the game here, but if I’m understanding correctly this path will let Redania annex Temeria? How come this doesn’t reflect in the Witcher 3?
5:00 roche is such a hypocrite. he literally called henselt a villian for saying where there is smoke there is fire yet he basically says the same by using other words. glad i joined iorveth, saved triss and helped dijkstra to become a chancellor.
In all honesty considering everything and all the choices. Radovids United Redenia and Temeria truly would be best in uniting the North and making it stronger.
From a Witcher 2 perspective, perhaps. From a Witcher 3 perspective, absolutely not - and the North would be better off under Nilfgaard than Redania in that regard.
@@indyMachineCristal I just don't get why they made Radovid a madman. Sure he was an opportunistic bastard but he wasn't insane enough to do the stuff in Witcher 3 without reason and out of pragmatism. He felt charismatic in the first game and the king that seemed to be best choice for witcher 2. The only thin I liked was how he was able to beat nilfgaard against the odds and a damn good military leader.
@@journey95far49 I hated what they did to Radovid and politics in general in TW3. It’s still my favourite game ever, but blind fanboys who never criticise it will jump down your throat if you hate the bad politics of the game.
@@stephen8805I'll call those" blind fanboys" Mainstreamers Whores,most of them didnt even played tw1 and 2 at first,they wont understand the difffrence and it wouldn't matter to them
Nicholas Ohmann But this is in Roche’s path. She gets her eyes taken out if you take Iorveth’s path; there’s a few events that play out differently in each one’s path.
@@boskifigueroa In TW3, you learn that she lost her eyes no matter which path you took. The only difference is you get to see it happen if you side with Iorveth, and only get to hear about it if you side with Roche.
@@thetardyowlvg9155 so basically none of your choices matter? As much as I like witcher 3, it feels like a lot of the choices made in the first 2 games don't matter. The scoiatel and order of the flaming rose/Roche paths don't matter.
I actually like some things in this game better than tw3, I would be so hyped if it came out like right now full open world graphics and size like tw3... I hate that I got spoiled by witcher 3 open world so it's really hard in witcher 2 for me
The story of TW2 is better in my opinion. The main story in TW3 is not bad, but it isn't the thing that gets you to replay the game over and over. The world is it. There are so many locations, so many contracts, so many side-quests and most of them got so much impact... emotional, complex, dark... Even in your third oder fourth walkthrough you encounter new things. Its just beautiful. The main story is just the string that keeps everything connected. In TW2 the main story is absolulety amazing, no comparison.
@@dwightsmith3815 the witcher 1 story is also really good in my opinion better than w2 or w3 but the gameplay is outdated and most of the game you re just walking around
@@belakanej There is so much lore too! The monsters I felt were great in w1. Different areas. Tons of characters. w1 is long and definitely keeps you interested. but yeah the point and click combat ehhh
@@belakanej The main story in W1 suffers the same as W3, the side quests are amazing though. The twist at the end is the only thing interesting about the main plot in W1.
@@josephryan5797 I feel like I’m the only one who likes the Witcher 1 combat, 3 different sword stances/styles (6 all together if you include silver sword) 5 unique move sets for each style, including a power move similar to reind or whirl, like dude that is ducking epic, And walking around during midnight was actually a huge risk due to monsters walking about, once ran into a herd of these weird fat witch looking things which I only found in the chapter 4 during the night
What happens To Anais Bother? This is a sad ending...Redanian is ruled by a Madman Radovid who hates Witches and all magic users alike. Both of Geralt's Love interests are Witches, on top of that Ciri is a MAgic user as well. Having Radovid Rule the lands is the worst ending there will be no peace for Witches or Wizards if they have the magic they are getting killed by him since he doesn't trust them. Nilfgaardians Accept all who are different even to their Ruler is pretty bad as well, at least he is far more accepting them Radovid is when it comes to Witches and Wizards.
did you read the books and played the games? nilfgaardians don't like witchers and they are outlaws in their lands, execute every druid and sometimes execute random mages for fun by dismembering them.
MYGOD Radovid would fall either way very soon. He promised to restore the old borders yet he didn’t. That’s bound to creat unrest. The Temerian Partisans will revolt, the keadwenis might also, and after that radivid will basically rule a kingdom in full on civil war and he won’t even able to do shit
@@theArab__ no, kaedwen has fallen into radovid's hand in the witcher 3, i forgot who said this, probably roche in temerian hideout. And nilfgaard dispose whoever useless to them. But when the need arise, they will use witchers and sorceresses, like letho, geralt, yen, fringilla, cynthia, vilgefortz, etc.
Looks like Sabrina Glessving (I dont remember her name well.) which is absurd because she was tortured and burned alive by the king of Caedwani during (or maybe after) a war. But not in front of civilians and not in a city
Trading a kid for political shit is never the right choice. Specially when you're getting her married off to a very older man. Its seriously not right, its sickness.
Skinny Snake I know they did. But that still doesn't make it right. In history, a lot of genocides happened to win realms. It was quite common. Does that make genocide right? No.
it doesn't make it right but you can only deal with it. in that case at least she is safe. genocides have nothing in common with these traditions. ah anyway i saved triss in both paths
Hello letalis can u make a another video about roche to show us what happens in witcher 3 with redanian roche,i want to learn myself but too lazy to do it.
So people say nothing about this but lose their sh*t when someone thinks of Geralt x Ciri? ik that's not the relationship they have in the books but Ciri's mother was exactly the same with her father, it's not an alien idea in the franchise, but people treat it like such, lol
"Never take your eyes off her," said Geralt to Roche as Anais was trailing behind the group, out of Roche's sight...
If Radovid wasnt made to be such madman, this union of the thrones would make the north very powerful,and with the inclusion of Kaedwen would basically form a almost united northern empire.
@Haljordan4life Everything about that questline ended badly, Radovid should be a power hungry zealot, not mad.
And Djikstra shouldn't spring his trap with Geralt present.
@Haljordan4life He's not even that power hungry, he just seized opportunity with the north in disarray but I'd say Henselt is a much more agressive expansionist, Radovid tried things in a more subtle manner and I doubt Kings like Foltest wouldn't have done otherwise given the chance.
@@sevach
Yeah the quest line is terrible. Radovid was ambitious but not a mad bigot. Long Live Radovid and the North!!
No
Roche wont do that
For a second I though it was Roach the horse, and was so confused
This was my very first ending, and once I saw Roche in Redanian red I felt myself violated. The end does not justify the means. Not like this.
Radovid is the one true king to save the North. Anyone who sided with Nilfgaard is evil.
@@stephen8805 in my 2nd w3 playthrough I let Radovid live. He might have crushed nilfgaard but he was incredibly cruel to his people
So sad for Roche. To save Temeria, it's either to sell your princess and soul to Radovid (TW2 here), or to sell your sovereign and soul to Emyr (TW3 siding with him). To save motherland, one must sell part of it, pure tragedy.
Vernon Roche - Ultimate Patriot
@@Matt-bg5wg I’m going to sacrifice him to make dijkstra King I think this will be the best choice Nilfgaard don’t deserve to be on top I hate them even more then I hated Radovid (I was only playing TW3 before)
@Cynical maybe your right but it’s hard to sacrifice him , but dijkstra will be a good king it’s better for the people
@@Blackpanther-cr2vr i have another solution let nilfgard win but make ciri it's empress
@@Sahil-hp3fz I can’t do that she will be unhappy it will be like a life in prison
Wonder how the conversation went in Tretogor.
"So ye Adda, I'm marrying your half sister"
Actually I learned recently that if Adda is alive Radovid implies Anais will simply stay in Tretogor with her half-sister (and probably be married off to some other high-standing noble Redanian) then when she comes of age she can return to Temeria to be the queen. He says "My future Bride" in this video which is only something he says if Adda isn't alive from Witcher 1.
@@TaxFraudTutorials I see, thanks for the information. Shame either way that any choice you make at the end of 2 has no impact on 3.
@@HEKVT It's funny considering the "War Recap" scene in Witcher 3 does account for your Henselt choice but nothing else as far as I know. I'm going to do a save import with this choice to see whether there is any difference. I doubt many people have footage considering you can't choose this outcome if you Simulate a save (Natalis is just the default)
@@TaxFraudTutorials Mhm, I started W3 before the other 2, then played them, I did a save from W1 with neutral ending where I spared Siegried and Yaevinn, as well as curing Adda again - in Witcher 2 it counted Siegfried as dead and Adda alive, and I did the Iorveth ending - in Witcher 3 I'm going to do a NG+ and import the save from that but I think the only change that will occur is Geralt having the tattoo, and Letho being alive.
He's gentle to Anais.
I like John Natalis and I think he's a little underated, I don't exactly remember what happened to him in Wild Hunt tho
same here
Zyad Hakmi bloody baron says Natalis is lost without trace.
@@individumm5366 Too bad that it possibly was too difficult to add him into the game. I mean what could be his purpose? The Temerian Guerillas are under Roches command, most of the deserters under the Baron... there is just no place for him where he could fit in well in the story. But thats a shame, i like Natalis. But on the other hand, i wouldn't want to see a broken Natalis in some stinking hole in Velen.
@2x11 Nickname As far as i know Roche never said that Natalis died. Only that he disappeared and no one knows anything. It is possible, though.
@2x11 Nickname It is possible... But you can survive a losing battle without being a coward. There are other ways to fight Nilfgaard, not only the guerilla-warfare of Roche. He could be in another Nothern Kingdom. But who knows. I hope he is alive
Bann Teagann playing John Natalis threw me off for a second
yeah indeed :)
This is sacrilege, am I right?
This is objectively the best outcome for anais herself. If Adda is alive, she's with her half-sister, and in the Capitol of Redania, far from the harm that she'd be in with Natalis and his civil war, she'd be a target for assassination's. If you gave her to Natalis she's probably dead by the time Witcher 3 rolls around whereas I can buy the idea of her at least surviving if she went with Radovid.
The lack of a mention in TW3 leads me to believe that Anias is probably still alive. I don't see why Radovid would kill Anias, anyway, since depending on the ending of TW2, he may have had Anias in his possession in the first place and was his link to the Temerian throne. Still, even if she was given to Natalis, it would be strange that she and Jon Natalis have disappeared for some silly reason. Odd how the so-called greatest military mind in the north just vanishes with the heir to Temeria. i mean I find the idea that he's hiding Anais more plausible although all this is mostly my take on it and not based on any solid factual grounding.
if you imported this save into witcher 3 would there be any unique dialogue during the quest where you assassinate radovid?
Sadly, no.
Know I’m late to the game here, but if I’m understanding correctly this path will let Redania annex Temeria? How come this doesn’t reflect in the Witcher 3?
Yeah the Witcher 2 doesn't fully translate into the next game ;[
Radovid is the one true King!!
Non canon? Roche is supported by Radovid, Temeria is under invasion wheter it is united or not and mages are hunted in W3 anyway so...
I never let Radovid marry Anais cause he's already married to Adda since I saved her and cured her of her striga curse.
I had no idea this was an outcome
5:00 roche is such a hypocrite. he literally called henselt a villian for saying where there is smoke there is fire yet he basically says the same by using other words. glad i joined iorveth, saved triss and helped dijkstra to become a chancellor.
In all honesty considering everything and all the choices. Radovids United Redenia and Temeria truly would be best in uniting the North and making it stronger.
From a Witcher 2 perspective, perhaps.
From a Witcher 3 perspective, absolutely not - and the North would be better off under Nilfgaard than Redania in that regard.
@Haljordan4life At least Nilfgaard doesn't burn herbalists at the stake.
@@indyMachineCristal I just don't get why they made Radovid a madman. Sure he was an opportunistic bastard but he wasn't insane enough to do the stuff in Witcher 3 without reason and out of pragmatism. He felt charismatic in the first game and the king that seemed to be best choice for witcher 2. The only thin I liked was how he was able to beat nilfgaard against the odds and a damn good military leader.
@@toledochristianmatthew9919 they just needed an antagonist for witcher 3 and they simp for nilfgaard and ignore its problems
@@indyMachineCristal No,stop sucking nilfgard off
If you do this, does Vernon still wish to assassinate Radovid in the third one?
I think so, but i'm not sure
yes, they took a shit on all the TW2 choices
@@journey95far49
I hated what they did to Radovid and politics in general in TW3. It’s still my favourite game ever, but blind fanboys who never criticise it will jump down your throat if you hate the bad politics of the game.
@@stephen8805I'll call those" blind fanboys" Mainstreamers Whores,most of them didnt even played tw1 and 2 at first,they wont understand the difffrence and it wouldn't matter to them
Obviously this ending not canon, seeing Eilhart trussed up on the stake at the end.
Thats not phillipa, she still has her eyes
Nicholas Ohmann But this is in Roche’s path. She gets her eyes taken out if you take Iorveth’s path; there’s a few events that play out differently in each one’s path.
@@boskifigueroa In TW3, you learn that she lost her eyes no matter which path you took. The only difference is you get to see it happen if you side with Iorveth, and only get to hear about it if you side with Roche.
@@thetardyowlvg9155 so basically none of your choices matter? As much as I like witcher 3, it feels like a lot of the choices made in the first 2 games don't matter. The scoiatel and order of the flaming rose/Roche paths don't matter.
I actually like some things in this game better than tw3, I would be so hyped if it came out like right now full open world graphics and size like tw3... I hate that I got spoiled by witcher 3 open world so it's really hard in witcher 2 for me
The story of TW2 is better in my opinion. The main story in TW3 is not bad, but it isn't the thing that gets you to replay the game over and over. The world is it. There are so many locations, so many contracts, so many side-quests and most of them got so much impact... emotional, complex, dark... Even in your third oder fourth walkthrough you encounter new things. Its just beautiful. The main story is just the string that keeps everything connected. In TW2 the main story is absolulety amazing, no comparison.
@@dwightsmith3815 the witcher 1 story is also really good in my opinion better than w2 or w3 but the gameplay is outdated and most of the game you re just walking around
@@belakanej There is so much lore too! The monsters I felt were great in w1. Different areas. Tons of characters. w1 is long and definitely keeps you interested. but yeah the point and click combat ehhh
@@belakanej The main story in W1 suffers the same as W3, the side quests are amazing though. The twist at the end is the only thing interesting about the main plot in W1.
@@josephryan5797 I feel like I’m the only one who likes the Witcher 1 combat, 3 different sword stances/styles (6 all together if you include silver sword) 5 unique move sets for each style, including a power move similar to reind or whirl, like dude that is ducking epic, And walking around during midnight was actually a huge risk due to monsters walking about, once ran into a herd of these weird fat witch looking things which I only found in the chapter 4 during the night
Roche dressed in red looks pretty great !
Bet he'd be Radovids body guard in Witcher 3 if the save gets simulated
No
Commie roche
i dont think doing this mission in any way changes anything in TW3
please inform me if i am wrong
indeed I don't think it does :(
What happens To Anais Bother? This is a sad ending...Redanian is ruled by a Madman Radovid who hates Witches and all magic users alike. Both of Geralt's Love interests are Witches, on top of that Ciri is a MAgic user as well. Having Radovid Rule the lands is the worst ending there will be no peace for Witches or Wizards if they have the magic they are getting killed by him since he doesn't trust them.
Nilfgaardians Accept all who are different even to their Ruler is pretty bad as well, at least he is far more accepting them Radovid is when it comes to Witches and Wizards.
did you read the books and played the games? nilfgaardians don't like witchers and they are outlaws in their lands, execute every druid and sometimes execute random mages for fun by dismembering them.
Boussy La Valette was death.
MYGOD Radovid would fall either way very soon. He promised to restore the old borders yet he didn’t. That’s bound to creat unrest. The Temerian Partisans will revolt, the keadwenis might also, and after that radivid will basically rule a kingdom in full on civil war and he won’t even able to do shit
@@theArab__ no, kaedwen has fallen into radovid's hand in the witcher 3, i forgot who said this, probably roche in temerian hideout. And nilfgaard dispose whoever useless to them. But when the need arise, they will use witchers and sorceresses, like letho, geralt, yen, fringilla, cynthia, vilgefortz, etc.
@@tegarsatriyo486 I doubt that if Ciri's in charge
Does this was any meaning in witcher 3?
don't think so :(
I feel like this game is better than witcher 3
Who is the sorceress being burned in the ending scene?
Looks like Sabrina Glessving (I dont remember her name well.) which is absurd because she was tortured and burned alive by the king of Caedwani during (or maybe after) a war. But not in front of civilians and not in a city
@@hallacson8535 I’m pretty sure it’s just some random sorcerer
@@notacockgobbler2054 fair enough, looks like they used the same models
pretty sure its phillipa eilhart
What have you done???!!!!!
the right choice is to save triss
Trading a kid for political shit is never the right choice. Specially when you're getting her married off to a very older man. Its seriously not right, its sickness.
+Mark Russel did you read the history? a lot of royal little children got married old people in the middle ages.
Skinny Snake I know they did. But that still doesn't make it right. In history, a lot of genocides happened to win realms. It was quite common. Does that make genocide right? No.
it doesn't make it right but you can only deal with it. in that case at least she is safe. genocides have nothing in common with these traditions. ah anyway i saved triss in both paths
Damn cutscenes in this game are long.
Hello letalis can u make a another video about roche to show us what happens in witcher 3 with redanian roche,i want to learn myself but too lazy to do it.
Keep going with witcher content
I don't have much left ;[ unless I go to Witcher 1
@@xLetalis he said 2 years ago
@@Jaann1919 hehe, I was referring to the Witcher 2
REDANIA!
WHAT! TEMERIA, AH F**K IT
is this a mod?
no
Why do you think that?
I hate Roche's path, I always side with iorveth, just seems like the real Geralt story to me.
thats fucked up
How you liking Witcher 2?
I like it a lot
TheeasyDM who doesnt like it
Can you do Witcher 1 videos? xD
I've been thinking about it
So people say nothing about this but lose their sh*t when someone thinks of Geralt x Ciri? ik that's not the relationship they have in the books but Ciri's mother was exactly the same with her father, it's not an alien idea in the franchise, but people treat it like such, lol
This is just fucking weird
poor kid forced to married a crazy man who took off the eyes of is last girlfriend. Roche made the worst decision for the kid
No.