I have great regard for Dhushyanth Sridhar's immense knowledge in the field of spirituality and his revolutionary thinking of reaching the scriptures to today's young generation who he believes would question and reason the traditional methods followed so far and hence wants to approach imparting knowledge in as scientific and acceptable ways as possible. All this at such a young age. It is almost like Adhi Sankara who died in his early 30's after having had a profound impact in the world of Sanathana Dharma being reincarinated for today's world. Dhushyant Sridhar recently visited Singapore where he was lecturing youngsters. He was explaining the 4 stages of human life in Sanathana Dharma in such a way that they sounded so male oriented...... Bramhacharyam.......grihastam.....vanaprastha.......sanyaasam..... etc. Aren't women human beings? If the stages for women are different, then we would like to know what they are from him. If it is Mr. Dhushyant Sridhar's professed idea of reaching our scriptures to today's generation, isn't gender neutrality one of the critical areas that today's generation watches out for in such lectures? How did he slip up on this when trying to reach our scriptures to the new generation? Even in revolutionizing the teaching, he should have got the blessings of his guru before releasing his book especially when his guru does not agree with him on his ageing of Lord Rama. This is fundamental - I mean both correlating the ageing of Rama with handed down information on the ageing and receiving the blessings of his guru before the launch. There is no reason not to follow sampradhaya and parampara while trying to revolutionize the teaching to reach today's generation
No sanadanam is different.and dont use that word. Abled speaker....present audience want quips sudden jokes ...available with osho also.Booklish knowledge is not wisdom...
Adiyenin namaskarankal
I have great regard for Dhushyanth Sridhar's immense knowledge in the field of spirituality and his revolutionary thinking of reaching the scriptures to today's young generation who he believes would question and reason the traditional methods followed so far and hence wants to approach imparting knowledge in as scientific and acceptable ways as possible. All this at such a young age. It is almost like Adhi Sankara who died in his early 30's after having had a profound impact in the world of Sanathana Dharma being reincarinated for today's world. Dhushyant Sridhar recently visited Singapore where he was lecturing youngsters. He was explaining the 4 stages of human life in Sanathana Dharma in such a way that they sounded so male oriented...... Bramhacharyam.......grihastam.....vanaprastha.......sanyaasam..... etc. Aren't women human beings? If the stages for women are different, then we would like to know what they are from him. If it is Mr. Dhushyant Sridhar's professed idea of reaching our scriptures to today's generation, isn't gender neutrality one of the critical areas that today's generation watches out for in such lectures? How did he slip up on this when trying to reach our scriptures to the new generation? Even in revolutionizing the teaching, he should have got the blessings of his guru before releasing his book especially when his guru does not agree with him on his ageing of Lord Rama. This is fundamental - I mean both correlating the ageing of Rama with handed down information on the ageing and receiving the blessings of his guru before the launch. There is no reason not to follow sampradhaya and parampara while trying to revolutionize the teaching to reach today's generation
No sanadanam is different.and dont use that word. Abled speaker....present audience want quips sudden jokes ...available with osho also.Booklish knowledge is not wisdom...