Disgusting behaviour from the master. He had a duty to those passengers and his crew and his ship (in that order of priority, I imagine) and he ought to have been found in dereliction of said duty, at minimum! I certainly wouldn't sail with such a ship's master again.
I hate to point out the obvious, but as in aviation any smoke should be an immediate emergency distress call. When you figure out it's not serious then you can cancel the emergency
Also the obvious is that when the driving force for doing things is profit, which is blatantly postulated in companies’ charters, then safety does not matter as much as profits. This is just how capitalism works.
@@tatianaes3354 Absolute nonsense my friend lmao. Why do people like you have to try to do this everywhere? The Admiral Nakhimov for example had nothing to do with profit motivation. Just give it a rest.
@@jimmydesouza4375 I think it would be fair to say that a great many disasters (maritime or otherwise) can at least be traced back to someone not wanting to hurt their or their superior's bottom line, regardless of what their nominal economic philosophy was. So, not necessarily capitalism itself, though, as an aside, I do in fact agree with that commenter that it can be blamed directly for a lot of misfortunes. In the case of the sinking of admiral nakhimov, and the exceptionally high loss of life, there were a number of contributing factors that would at least fall under the "protect the bottom line" mantra. But yeah, of course an accident taking place in the soviet union involving two soviet ships can't really be blamed on capitalism hahaha
@@stinkytoy Of course human fallibility is to blame for everything that isn't simple freak happenstance. It still doesn't change the fact that screaming about capitalism is never a cogent observation and simply people giving airtime to their brainwashing. And it is so boring too. 24/7/365 every single thing in media or online is "capitalism bad!!" Does someone like the guy I replied to think he is being brave or unique by parroting the thing he was told to parrot all through his education?
@@jimmydesouza4375 ....I think you may be overstating the degree to which society is inundated with anti-capitalism propaganda. I guess you could just run into it a lot, but I certainly don't. And even if it was indeed constant and insufferable, you can rest assured that it isn't making a difference beyond annoying some folks. It does sound like you're pretty upset about this, though. Don't worry, capitalism isn't going anywhere. In the meantime, it's easy to just write off and ignore the comments you're talking about.
So there were no sprinklers in the storeroom because it was orrigionally a toilet. Genuine question, why were there no sprinklers in the toilets? All I can think is they're either unnecessary due to the amount of other plumbing, or somehow unsafe.
I would imagine the lack of flammable materials, since retty much everything would be metal/ceramic/porcelain. Which would naturally prevent the small fires that could start in the trashcans and toiletpaper/paper towel holders from spreading or growing too large.
Gordon Lightfoot wrote and recorded “The Ballad of the Yarmouth Castle”. It was really interesting to learn the real details from this video and compare them to the lyrics (I think the song did a very good job.)
The mandated installation of fireproof and fire resisting materials in the fitting out of vessels, together with the banning of materials which emit toxic smoke has gone a long way to ensure vessels safety. Likewise, the shipwide installation of sophisticated electronic fire detection, alarm and suppression systems and CCTV, and a mandated Fire Watch Officer helps to minimise the incidence of shipborne fires. It took horrendously large losses of life before proper systems were mandated which ship owners were forced to comply with, but modern vessels have immensely better protection than at any other time in marine history.
@@Hybris51129 My point is that this is all indeed textbook stuff, so why did the industry take so long resisting the implementation of these obvious safety measures until they had to be forced into doing it by government legislation?
@@Hybris51129No, that's just what it looks like when someone actually knows how to write their sentences and structure their paragraphs in a logical and coherent manner. It's really quite sad that it's so rare.
@@Hybris51129 You're not wrong, it's just sad that this is where we find ourselves. In most other contexts I'd be inclined to agree with your assessment.
Such a sad ending to such a beautiful ship. Its a good thing tho that there were other vessels nearby, which i got sattisfied of seeing another ship giving aid to a sinking ship and rescuing her Passengers. I cant imagine how terrifying it would be if the Finnpulp had already gone away faster and didnt detected the Yarmouth Castle, or if the Bahama Star was too far away behind the sinking ship... Rest in peace for those who had lost their lives in that tragedy
While the master did leave the ship early, they also didn't get any distress call off, so direct person to person communication was the only way the rescue ships knew the number of souls or how many lifeboats were needed and such I would guess
Did the master of the Yarmouth Castle get in any trouble? Or was taking a lifeboat to the nearby ship to communicate about the evacuation correct protocol since they lost radio contact?
Was wondering this too but I concluded that surely it was more important for him to stay on the ship to do whatever he could and instead delegate someone else to be responsible for sending out communications, like, say, the radio operators who otherwise had no duty to perform anyway.
The investigation blamed him and the crew for abandoning ship and not properly assisting in evacuation, but I can't find any info on whether or not he faced any consequences. The captain claims he always intended to return to the ship (which according to one report he did), and that he was the last to leave.
So this is where Schettino got the idea of fucking off the moment shit hits the fan... though he seems to have missed the part about making himself useful.
It might be an unknown aspect of the incident but I was wondering what caused the ship to actually sink? Did the fire burn/melt through the outer hull or was it a result of all the firefighting water not getting drained/pumped overboard?
Seems like the fire burned through the hull: "All survivors had been pulled aboard Finnpulp and Bahama Star by 4:00 a.m., by which time YARMOUTH CASTLE´s hull was glowing red. The water around the ship was visibly boiling. Just before 6:00 a.m., YARMOUTH CASTLE rolled over onto its port side. There was a roar of steam and bursting boilers, and it sank beneath the surface at 6:03 a.m." Source: Article from Wrecksite
Thanks- I had the same question and was wondering how to ask without looking like a complete noob- I was certain I was missing something obvious. You managed to hit on what I had considered, so thanks for getting it addressed.
@0topon By that account, I'd say it's possible the hull didn't burn through, but softened enough from the high temperature that it yielded and folded in on it self, potentially ripping it self apart on the process. End result is the same non the less.
It's very unlikely the hull "burned through". However ships have many intakes, drains, sea chests and other openings. The fire would have melted or burned off seals or gaskets. Components are often brass, which has a much lower melting point than steel. The subsequent failure of these openings would allow tons of water in to the hull.
Im kind of surprised the ship is still undiscovered as i wouldve thought the rescue ships wouldve documented the exact position so as to later find it or at least for the investigation.
I think it's because it's not a high priority wreck. It's too deep there for any chance of post-sinking survivors, and the causes could be determined without the wreck. The only information that could only have been determined by investigating the wreck is the initial cause of the fire, but that evidence was probably destroyed by either the fire or the sinking.
@@hanzzel6086 Fair enough it's just still kind of a surprise it hasn't been found yet just because you think okay somewhat easy find. But maybe one day someone will stumble upon it by accident like so many other wrecks throughout history have been. It would be interesting to see if any of the burned part of the ship still remains given it's how badly it's probably degraded over time.
That long ago, "exact position" without GPS would not be what we think of it today. On top of that, she's VERY deep and they got a pretty good report without finding her, so you have to wonder how much added benefit would it be to find her compared to the cost of finding her.
@@weylinpiegorsch9253 Probably not super accurate tue but gives searchers a decent location to look. Other ship wrecks have been much further down and it's more of just a way of finding long lost forgotten ships. There's rarely money to be made in finding a ship but the historical value is there. There are so many ships out there that have gone missing and the reason they're famous and wish to be found is that there were no survivors and people want to know what happened. Obviously in this case yeah we know what happened but it still be nice to see what the ship looks like today. Again someone may stumble across her though probably unlikely at this point. Still it be nice if just one more lost ship could be found. Heck it be nice if all lost ships could be found but that's a big ask.
@@weylinpiegorsch9253 Plus exact position on the surface, it's still got a ways to go down and it drifts with currents to some extent, it won't go dead straight down to the floor
@@cruisinguy6024 That's true. Other channels talked about what failed on the sub. But I'd be interested to hear CasNav's description of the communication and failures therein from the surface vessel.
I want to extend my sincere thanks to the crew of the finnpulp and bahama star for doing what they could. Without your courage and hard work, it would've been so much worse.
Not grandfathering in previously deemed safe technology would mean that we need to replace 80% of all buildings, cars, trains, ships and power plants. That is not economically viable. New stuff has to follow the new rules is the only way to ever get it done without massive disturbance to the economy.
@@TheHalfBorg The economy is not a person. The economy is, in fact, zero people. "The Economy" is just wall street bankers' drug funds. I don't give a flying shit about "The Economy". I care about knowingly endangering HUMAN LIVES to save money. That's morally disgusting to me.
@@bryceanderson4864you'll never know that. Everything made by someone or something else is good enough, until it isn't. I work in IT, I could tell you how many critical systems are protected by "admin123" and are tied into a 20 years old vendor software with proprietary code that does some absolutely critical function. My entire career has been in make these 3 or 4 distinct systems talk to each other and then make the output human readible. Also business was behind the 8 ball with the funding approvals and prioritization and you now have 6 weeks to solve and productionize all of the code or the client will be big mad. I would still trust legacy tech that has been continuously in service over anything modern.
I never understood why some (older?) engine powered ships also have masts and ropes...?? The 87 casualties were due to the fire and not the sinking of the ship, right?
Shouldn't the location of the wreckage be pretty well known? It was before GPS but there were two other ships and several aircraft on site. Then again, I don't know if much effort has gone intro trying to find it.
Seems like the fire burned through the hull: "All survivors had been pulled aboard Finnpulp and Bahama Star by 4:00 a.m., by which time YARMOUTH CASTLE´s hull was glowing red. The water around the ship was visibly boiling. Just before 6:00 a.m., YARMOUTH CASTLE rolled over onto its port side. There was a roar of steam and bursting boilers, and it sank beneath the surface at 6:03 a.m." Source: Article from Wrecksite
@@sct913I'm gonna look into this more myself but do you happen to know anything more about that? Like did he just leave him in the lifeboat to go back and rescue more people, having him take up a seat each time?
The explanation of events is a bit unclear. The way you explain it, the crew knew about the fire for a while, and searched for it before bothering to alert anyone, and when they perhaps maybe kind of thought about sounding alarms it was too late????
I wish to create a channel similar to your but instead of ships I will create animations about planes.could you tell me which animation software you use
I always get a lump in my throat and slightly teary eyed when external people help, and when the engine staff go down with the ship while on duty and giving more time to everyone else to get out. They always go last, if ever :(
I can't imagine showing my face in public or even living with my conscience if I was a ship captain and abandoned everyone. That captain and the Costa Concordia captain have to be sociopaths.
I hate get my peanut butter in y'all's chocolate, but this is what we're fighting for, in Ukraine, and at the ballot box in the US. Institutions. Democratic scientific institutions. That's what gives value to these lessons.
Smart to see that on the radar and respond immediately!
How many people would have no care or curiosity about why something was moving away from you
Yes indeed, truly exceptional professionalism.
yeah a fucking sarcasm shit
Props to the engineer crew staying to the end while the master ran off.
Master should have been charged with redrum and manslaughter, then banned from any seafaring activities.
Disgusting behaviour from the master. He had a duty to those passengers and his crew and his ship (in that order of priority, I imagine) and he ought to have been found in dereliction of said duty, at minimum! I certainly wouldn't sail with such a ship's master again.
I hate to point out the obvious, but as in aviation any smoke should be an immediate emergency distress call. When you figure out it's not serious then you can cancel the emergency
Also the obvious is that when the driving force for doing things is profit, which is blatantly postulated in companies’ charters, then safety does not matter as much as profits. This is just how capitalism works.
@@tatianaes3354 Absolute nonsense my friend lmao. Why do people like you have to try to do this everywhere? The Admiral Nakhimov for example had nothing to do with profit motivation.
Just give it a rest.
@@jimmydesouza4375 I think it would be fair to say that a great many disasters (maritime or otherwise) can at least be traced back to someone not wanting to hurt their or their superior's bottom line, regardless of what their nominal economic philosophy was. So, not necessarily capitalism itself, though, as an aside, I do in fact agree with that commenter that it can be blamed directly for a lot of misfortunes.
In the case of the sinking of admiral nakhimov, and the exceptionally high loss of life, there were a number of contributing factors that would at least fall under the "protect the bottom line" mantra. But yeah, of course an accident taking place in the soviet union involving two soviet ships can't really be blamed on capitalism hahaha
@@stinkytoy Of course human fallibility is to blame for everything that isn't simple freak happenstance. It still doesn't change the fact that screaming about capitalism is never a cogent observation and simply people giving airtime to their brainwashing.
And it is so boring too. 24/7/365 every single thing in media or online is "capitalism bad!!" Does someone like the guy I replied to think he is being brave or unique by parroting the thing he was told to parrot all through his education?
@@jimmydesouza4375 ....I think you may be overstating the degree to which society is inundated with anti-capitalism propaganda. I guess you could just run into it a lot, but I certainly don't. And even if it was indeed constant and insufferable, you can rest assured that it isn't making a difference beyond annoying some folks.
It does sound like you're pretty upset about this, though. Don't worry, capitalism isn't going anywhere. In the meantime, it's easy to just write off and ignore the comments you're talking about.
Still so important to this day to always have crew members designated to keeping watch.
One of the incidents that caused a world wide ban on timber framing onboard passenger ships.
Admirable efforts by both the crew and the rescuers. They surely rescued many people given the circumstances.
Crew maybe but commander who ran in the first boat? LOL no...
With the notable exception of the Captain and other crew who were in the first lifeboat off
So there were no sprinklers in the storeroom because it was orrigionally a toilet.
Genuine question, why were there no sprinklers in the toilets?
All I can think is they're either unnecessary due to the amount of other plumbing, or somehow unsafe.
I would imagine the lack of flammable materials, since retty much everything would be metal/ceramic/porcelain. Which would naturally prevent the small fires that could start in the trashcans and toiletpaper/paper towel holders from spreading or growing too large.
People smoking in the toilet?
I should think there were plenty of sprinklers in the toilets.
I like your intro ... extremely respectful of the tragedy that happenned. Well done.
Gordon Lightfoot wrote and recorded “The Ballad of the Yarmouth Castle”. It was really interesting to learn the real details from this video and compare them to the lyrics (I think the song did a very good job.)
Not the only shipping tragedy he did a song about. The Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald. One of the saddest songs I know.
When you train to be a licensed captain, a huge amount of time is spent on fire prevention and fire-fighting training. This is why.
The mandated installation of fireproof and fire resisting materials in the fitting out of vessels, together with the banning of materials which emit toxic smoke has gone a long way to ensure vessels safety.
Likewise, the shipwide installation of sophisticated electronic fire detection, alarm and suppression systems and CCTV, and a mandated Fire Watch Officer helps to minimise the incidence of shipborne fires.
It took horrendously large losses of life before proper systems were mandated which ship owners were forced to comply with, but modern vessels have immensely better protection than at any other time in marine history.
While I don't question any of these statements this is so textbook that it sounds like an AI bot made the comment.
@@Hybris51129 My point is that this is all indeed textbook stuff, so why did the industry take so long resisting the implementation of these obvious safety measures until they had to be forced into doing it by government legislation?
@@Hybris51129No, that's just what it looks like when someone actually knows how to write their sentences and structure their paragraphs in a logical and coherent manner. It's really quite sad that it's so rare.
@@user-Aaron- In this age of rampant bot accounts it pays to question when something looks too good.
@@Hybris51129 You're not wrong, it's just sad that this is where we find ourselves. In most other contexts I'd be inclined to agree with your assessment.
Such a sad ending to such a beautiful ship. Its a good thing tho that there were other vessels nearby, which i got sattisfied of seeing another ship giving aid to a sinking ship and rescuing her Passengers. I cant imagine how terrifying it would be if the Finnpulp had already gone away faster and didnt detected the Yarmouth Castle, or if the Bahama Star was too far away behind the sinking ship...
Rest in peace for those who had lost their lives in that tragedy
While the master did leave the ship early, they also didn't get any distress call off, so direct person to person communication was the only way the rescue ships knew the number of souls or how many lifeboats were needed and such I would guess
Did the master of the Yarmouth Castle get in any trouble? Or was taking a lifeboat to the nearby ship to communicate about the evacuation correct protocol since they lost radio contact?
Was wondering this too but I concluded that surely it was more important for him to stay on the ship to do whatever he could and instead delegate someone else to be responsible for sending out communications, like, say, the radio operators who otherwise had no duty to perform anyway.
@@user-Aaron- "Congratulations Kiff, you're promoted from radio operator to captain! I'll see you soon. Maybe.""
The investigation blamed him and the crew for abandoning ship and not properly assisting in evacuation, but I can't find any info on whether or not he faced any consequences. The captain claims he always intended to return to the ship (which according to one report he did), and that he was the last to leave.
He was tried for "Violation of Duty" but I can't find anything about the outcome of the trial.
Amazing work from the nearby ships.
Binocliars? 4:24 And the wonky 'P' in the Port sign, lol. Love watching for that easter egg.
Fun fact: Apparently a woman the Captain of The Bahamas Star was dating was actually on the Yarmouth Castle and she survived the disaster
Also thank YOU for the interesting topic again!
So this is where Schettino got the idea of fucking off the moment shit hits the fan... though he seems to have missed the part about making himself useful.
He was probably useless
It might be an unknown aspect of the incident but I was wondering what caused the ship to actually sink? Did the fire burn/melt through the outer hull or was it a result of all the firefighting water not getting drained/pumped overboard?
Seems like the fire burned through the hull: "All survivors had been pulled aboard Finnpulp and Bahama Star by 4:00 a.m., by which time YARMOUTH CASTLE´s hull was glowing red. The water around the ship was visibly boiling. Just before 6:00 a.m., YARMOUTH CASTLE rolled over onto its port side. There was a roar of steam and bursting boilers, and it sank beneath the surface at 6:03 a.m." Source: Article from Wrecksite
Thanks- I had the same question and was wondering how to ask without looking like a complete noob- I was certain I was missing something obvious. You managed to hit on what I had considered, so thanks for getting it addressed.
@0topon By that account, I'd say it's possible the hull didn't burn through, but softened enough from the high temperature that it yielded and folded in on it self, potentially ripping it self apart on the process. End result is the same non the less.
@@2testtest2 I thought the same, i would classify this scenario though as "burned through".
It's very unlikely the hull "burned through". However ships have many intakes, drains, sea chests and other openings. The fire would have melted or burned off seals or gaskets. Components are often brass, which has a much lower melting point than steel. The subsequent failure of these openings would allow tons of water in to the hull.
Now i understand, one of my own long standing questions about ship structure.
Im kind of surprised the ship is still undiscovered as i wouldve thought the rescue ships wouldve documented the exact position so as to later find it or at least for the investigation.
I think it's because it's not a high priority wreck. It's too deep there for any chance of post-sinking survivors, and the causes could be determined without the wreck. The only information that could only have been determined by investigating the wreck is the initial cause of the fire, but that evidence was probably destroyed by either the fire or the sinking.
@@hanzzel6086 Fair enough it's just still kind of a surprise it hasn't been found yet just because you think okay somewhat easy find. But maybe one day someone will stumble upon it by accident like so many other wrecks throughout history have been. It would be interesting to see if any of the burned part of the ship still remains given it's how badly it's probably degraded over time.
That long ago, "exact position" without GPS would not be what we think of it today. On top of that, she's VERY deep and they got a pretty good report without finding her, so you have to wonder how much added benefit would it be to find her compared to the cost of finding her.
@@weylinpiegorsch9253 Probably not super accurate tue but gives searchers a decent location to look. Other ship wrecks have been much further down and it's more of just a way of finding long lost forgotten ships. There's rarely money to be made in finding a ship but the historical value is there. There are so many ships out there that have gone missing and the reason they're famous and wish to be found is that there were no survivors and people want to know what happened. Obviously in this case yeah we know what happened but it still be nice to see what the ship looks like today. Again someone may stumble across her though probably unlikely at this point. Still it be nice if just one more lost ship could be found. Heck it be nice if all lost ships could be found but that's a big ask.
@@weylinpiegorsch9253 Plus exact position on the surface, it's still got a ways to go down and it drifts with currents to some extent, it won't go dead straight down to the floor
Would you ever consider doing a breakdown of the OceanGate stuff? Not the physics but the procedure and mishandling.
I don’t know what he could offer that hasn’t already been covered by numerous other channels and analysis. We all know what went wrong there.
@@cruisinguy6024 That's true. Other channels talked about what failed on the sub. But I'd be interested to hear CasNav's description of the communication and failures therein from the surface vessel.
Best channel on youtube
Really good video. Well done!
No mention of the fate of captain "Schettino"? That guy at least got 16 years in prison.
more vids of cases with this type of animation , love it
I want to extend my sincere thanks to the crew of the finnpulp and bahama star for doing what they could. Without your courage and hard work, it would've been so much worse.
Hi there great vid however I'd would like to a video on ship prefixes ie SS and MV as I still don't understand what there for thank you
I remember when it happened. It was an old tub, too old to still be sailing.
5:30 still don't know what a rollock is
Rowlock - it's the brace in the side of a boat that the oar sits in to hold it in place and acts as the fulcrum to provide the leverage.
@@SMqk9oo Thank you! Part of it was the accent / pronunciation. If I heard "row lock" instead of "roll ock" I could've figured it out from context.
30 year anniversary of M/S Estonia
Grandfathering in things that aren't up to code should not be a thing. If it's not safe, it's not safe, never mind how old it is.
The Boeing 737 has entered the chat
Not grandfathering in previously deemed safe technology would mean that we need to replace 80% of all buildings, cars, trains, ships and power plants.
That is not economically viable.
New stuff has to follow the new rules is the only way to ever get it done without massive disturbance to the economy.
@@TheHalfBorg The economy is not a person. The economy is, in fact, zero people. "The Economy" is just wall street bankers' drug funds. I don't give a flying shit about "The Economy". I care about knowingly endangering HUMAN LIVES to save money. That's morally disgusting to me.
@@TheHalfBorgFair, but people should have the right to know if and how something is not up to code.
@@bryceanderson4864you'll never know that. Everything made by someone or something else is good enough, until it isn't.
I work in IT, I could tell you how many critical systems are protected by "admin123" and are tied into a 20 years old vendor software with proprietary code that does some absolutely critical function. My entire career has been in make these 3 or 4 distinct systems talk to each other and then make the output human readible. Also business was behind the 8 ball with the funding approvals and prioritization and you now have 6 weeks to solve and productionize all of the code or the client will be big mad.
I would still trust legacy tech that has been continuously in service over anything modern.
dumb question but how did the ship sink if the fire was on the upper decks? how did water start getting into the hull?
A security officer on rounds didn't check the area where the fire started. That was the only area he missed. Coincidence?
What a night.
I never understood why some (older?) engine powered ships also have masts and ropes...??
The 87 casualties were due to the fire and not the sinking of the ship, right?
Often they are for radar and radio. They aren’t ropes, they’re antennas.
@@DanStaal thank you very much!
The Moby Prince disaster would make a good video
What happens to the steel hulls when this happens? I mean they sink so does the hull just warp and let water in?
can you do the dona paz next?
Renaming a ship brings bad luck.
Shouldn't the location of the wreckage be pretty well known? It was before GPS but there were two other ships and several aircraft on site. Then again, I don't know if much effort has gone intro trying to find it.
Was the ship master punished for abandoning ship so early?
Was the master’s surname Schettino by any chance?
So why exactly did it sink? Heared about ships that have burned for days without sinking
Seems like the fire burned through the hull: "All survivors had been pulled aboard Finnpulp and Bahama Star by 4:00 a.m., by which time YARMOUTH CASTLE´s hull was glowing red. The water around the ship was visibly boiling. Just before 6:00 a.m., YARMOUTH CASTLE rolled over onto its port side. There was a roar of steam and bursting boilers, and it sank beneath the surface at 6:03 a.m."
Source: Article from Wrecksite
@@0topon Thanks
@@0topon Thanks for that info, Casual Navigation could have been more informative.
That's the great thing about seamen, they see someone in need and they turn their shit around and help
Captain first one to evacuate 😅
I always understood that the master of Bahama Star refused to let him board his ship.
@@sct913I'm gonna look into this more myself but do you happen to know anything more about that? Like did he just leave him in the lifeboat to go back and rescue more people, having him take up a seat each time?
@@user-Aaron- As I recall, he was directed to go back to the Yarmouth Castle.
The explanation of events is a bit unclear. The way you explain it, the crew knew about the fire for a while, and searched for it before bothering to alert anyone, and when they perhaps maybe kind of thought about sounding alarms it was too late????
He was the schettino of the 60s.
This captain i have very few sentences to describe him for what he did.
new video keep up the good work
People Coughed to death
Safety regulations are written in blood.
Surely it's pronounced "Nas-saw" in the Bahamas, "Nass-ow" in New York state.
42 min response time from the coast guard. 😮
Nuggets
I wish to create a channel similar to your but instead of ships I will create animations about planes.could you tell me which animation software you use
I will watch when you do, aviation safety has long been an interest of mine
Why do Greek and Italian captains seem to abandon ship so quickly?
The Master abandoned while there were still hundreds of passengers to be evacuated???
73rd!
it was lucky
As a former Army grunt, I learned that pretty much all rules and regulations were written in blood.
I've been a UA-cam member for 1 year 8 months. Are we chop liver?
FINLAND MENTIONED RAAAHHHHHH!!!🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅
Another vid about this suspected Arson as the fire cause , disgruntled employee ..
Nass-ow? It’s not German :)
I always get a lump in my throat and slightly teary eyed when external people help, and when the engine staff go down with the ship while on duty and giving more time to everyone else to get out. They always go last, if ever :(
Another cowardly captain.
hello
I can't imagine showing my face in public or even living with my conscience if I was a ship captain and abandoned everyone. That captain and the Costa Concordia captain have to be sociopaths.
Nope, just Mediterranean 😂
real.
Safety rules, as the saying goes, are always written in blood.
My TV shortened the video title after "SS" so I came here to say "Nürnberg"...
ein Kommentar
Nessow bahamas
I hate get my peanut butter in y'all's chocolate, but this is what we're fighting for, in Ukraine, and at the ballot box in the US. Institutions. Democratic scientific institutions. That's what gives value to these lessons.
😂😂😂 in Ukraine? What?
First
K
K
🥂
Hi
7th
2nd