Particle Life - A Game of Life Made of Particles

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
  • An organic alternative to Conway's Game of Life involving only particles and forces.
    Download:
    Standalone (Windows 64-bit): github.com/HackerPoet/Particl...
    Source Code: github.com/HackerPoet/Particl...
    Browser Version: github.com/fnky/particle-life
    Links:
    Conway's Game of Life: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%...
    Online Simulator: bitstorm.org/gameoflife/
    Jeffery Ventrella's 'Clusters': www.ventrella.com/Clusters/
    Music:
    Stress - Luxurious Vegetation
    / luxuriousvegetation

КОМЕНТАРІ • 488

  • @xenontesla122
    @xenontesla122 5 років тому +1149

    It's interesting how many of the stable arrangements are symmetric.

    • @CodeParade
      @CodeParade  5 років тому +370

      It's also true in Conway's Game of Life!
      The reason is because if it was asymmetric, the forces would be unbalanced, so particles would tend to move. Either the whole arrangement gets a torque (spinning) or a particle will change position to make it symmetric.

    • @davelife3324
      @davelife3324 4 роки тому +44

      MorTobXD Most animals today are bilaterally or radially symmetric, but some animals are asymmetric. Most are only asymmetrical due to a single part of their body (think snapping shrimps) while others are completely asymmetrical (think some sponges).

    • @mdoerkse
      @mdoerkse 4 роки тому +24

      @@davelife3324 Humans look symmetric on the outside, but not completely on the inside.

    • @davelife3324
      @davelife3324 4 роки тому +23

      mdoerkse That’s true. Symmetry (for the most part) is selected for due to aerodynamics, so it doesn’t matter what’s on the inside near as much.

    • @NStripleseven
      @NStripleseven 4 роки тому +8

      Makes sense, actually. If an arrangement weren't symmetric, it would be moving, as forces would be unbalanced.

  • @chepulis
    @chepulis 5 років тому +679

    Now repeat this in 3D. Seems a simple enough leap

    • @LamanodeManolo
      @LamanodeManolo 5 років тому +67

      I really thought that's what he did with the bit shown at 2:30. I was blown away and would love to see it!

    • @kalenipclaw5683
      @kalenipclaw5683 5 років тому +19

      And then FRACTALLISED 3D

    • @seannissenbaum3704
      @seannissenbaum3704 5 років тому +26

      @@LamanodeManolo lol just spent like an hour doing it in unity. Pretty cool, some really fascinating arrangements however a lot of it looks kinda like messy blobs. edit: I should add I did not follow the source code, just made up whatever numbers I liked for the interactions and tweaked for "coolness".

    • @CodeParade
      @CodeParade  5 років тому +121

      Someone already did it! ua-cam.com/video/mnr0UoClDNQ/v-deo.html

    • @hexagonist23
      @hexagonist23 5 років тому +5

      No don't do that
      That's my job

  • @g59enjoyer48
    @g59enjoyer48 3 роки тому +31

    2:41 "Life, it seems, is really a giant fractal. It all goes back to that emergent behavior arising from simple rules. And that's what the universe is."
    I love this channel. Profound video, thank you for this.

  • @davawen9938
    @davawen9938 4 роки тому +663

    "And that's what the universe is made out of : Simple rules."
    Quantum Mechanics : *Get a load of this guy*

    • @alansmithee419
      @alansmithee419 4 роки тому +72

      *laughs in superposition*
      Or does it?
      Well, yes but actually no.

    • @hubert6943
      @hubert6943 4 роки тому +21

      i would love the universe to be made of just a couple of amazingly simple rules. like, in a sense we always kind of miss out on everyday basis of how everything works

    • @videogmz7047
      @videogmz7047 4 роки тому +37

      @@alansmithee419 it only laughs when you observe it

    • @realdragon
      @realdragon 4 роки тому +9

      Probably it can be simplyfied to wave function

    • @tassadardaris7294
      @tassadardaris7294 3 роки тому +13

      Simple rules still apply, but our observation messes up detection of any patterns, so we have to find patterns in the mess ups to describe the universe. If the universe were a simulation you could just observe these states without interfering with them so no problem there.

  • @gustuscom1061
    @gustuscom1061 5 років тому +55

    you should make this a background that refreshes every 20 mins or something

  • @cng-
    @cng- 4 роки тому +26

    Imagine if certain colors ate each other. And they changed depending on particles around them ex: constant attraction means particles will become more attractive and less repulsive, and minimal attraction will fade into nothing.

  • @deltuhvee
    @deltuhvee 5 років тому +104

    i think they are slowly achieving sentinence, soon they will make their own particle life simulator and replace you

    • @CyberCrow4
      @CyberCrow4 Рік тому

      Maybe everyone around us was once a simple life simulator and we have already replaced our creators...

    • @CyberCrow4
      @CyberCrow4 Рік тому

      Maybe everyone around us was once a simple life simulator and we have already replaced our creators...

  • @Eichro
    @Eichro 5 років тому +224

    1:17 build speed forever? 12 hours is enough to get to a PU

    • @gius8068
      @gius8068 5 років тому +39

      But can you do it in 0.5 A presses?

    • @Michael-cg7yz
      @Michael-cg7yz 5 років тому +23

      I see you are a man of the culture.

    • @fendoroid3788
      @fendoroid3788 5 років тому +6

      I see you are a man of culture too

    • @boltstrikes429
      @boltstrikes429 5 років тому +8

      @@gius8068 half an A press? Heresy!

    • @fendoroid3788
      @fendoroid3788 5 років тому +2

      Actually, there are lots of men of culture here.

  • @wencesvm
    @wencesvm 5 років тому +68

    Dude I love your content, such interesting projects, keep it up!

  • @drdca8263
    @drdca8263 5 років тому +83

    Hm, if this also had a mechanism for particles to be created and destroyed, or changed in type, I wonder if glider-gun like structures could be made.

    • @CodeParade
      @CodeParade  5 років тому +33

      That would be really interesting, and a totally different dynamic to the game. I'd bet you *could* get glider-gun structures that way.

    • @eddieh7962
      @eddieh7962 5 років тому +7

      I made my own implementation of this and I’ve definitely had structures with like 3 strongly charged molecules in the back that control the direction of the whole structure

    • @Oberon4278
      @Oberon4278 4 роки тому +12

      @@CodeParade Give each particle randomly-assigned "mass," add an energy field, and a way for particles to be created/destroyed. Creation can only happen when there's enough energy in a localized field to make up the mass of a particle, and destruction of a particle turns their mass into energy.
      Of course then you have to have a way for the energy in the field to influence the movement of the particles, and for the particles to interact with the energy, and it gets really complicated really quick.

    • @goldenwarrior1186
      @goldenwarrior1186 9 місяців тому +1

      @@Oberon4278And ta-da, the universe pops out!

  • @Komplexitet
    @Komplexitet 3 роки тому +5

    2:40 "Life it seems is, really a giant fractal."

  • @AndrewDinspechin
    @AndrewDinspechin 3 роки тому +1

    I don't know how to say this other than watching these things is very serene, like watching koi fish

  • @yboris
    @yboris 5 років тому +10

    Phenomenal!
    I have a BA in math, have read a lot of math books, am a programmer now, and only _now_ I come across this! This should be more-widely known

  • @NonTwinBrothers
    @NonTwinBrothers 5 років тому +2

    Glad I'm not the only one aware of Ventrella's work

  • @darthalex314
    @darthalex314 5 років тому +4

    That's crazy. I'm currently reading The Salmon of Doubt by Douglas Adams, and I just finished the part where he discusses how his fascination with computers and evolutionary biology both stem from the amazing idea that beautiful complexity can come from simple rules. It's truly a fascinating concept.

  • @Liam_Patton
    @Liam_Patton 3 роки тому +1

    you and I could have an unbelievable conversation about particle physics

  • @halonothing1
    @halonothing1 Рік тому

    I'm really glad I found this video. I must have downloaded this while I was half asleep and couldn't for the life of me figure out EXACTLY what it was. I could definitely tell it was similar to Conway's Game of Life, and something to do with the attraction/repulsion of the particles based on color, but that was as much as I could figure out by watching it and studying the various controls. It took a lot of searching around your site to find this video, and the "about" section on the app only shows the name of who I assume is the creator and nothing more. But I'm just glad I can finally understand this. I've gotta say, it's a really fun app to play with and a really great idea. I'm glad I stumbled across this.

  • @misterjigolo
    @misterjigolo 5 років тому +1

    Amazing content man. Your channel is a hidden gem for now but I'll bet it won't stay that way for long! Hope you the best.

  • @XDKvlogs
    @XDKvlogs 5 років тому +1

    Life is a fractal, that statement just helps reiterate the old saying 'as above so below' although in a slightly different context

  • @Rotem_S
    @Rotem_S 5 років тому +15

    hmm. perhaps in the future I'll try to create some continuum differential equations for this to see what would happen for really large things

    • @zokalyx
      @zokalyx 5 років тому +2

      be sure to let us know. that seems cool.

    • @alexs710
      @alexs710 5 років тому +1

      can u develop ur idea with more accessible terms ? Sounds interesting. from what i get now, you mean you want to be able to change the size of the particles in the game but then the physics rules within the game should be changed too to get more close to reality right ?

  • @Jamie-my7lb
    @Jamie-my7lb 4 роки тому +1

    Rest in peace, John Conway.

  • @timtrussnersims
    @timtrussnersims 5 років тому +5

    Very very cool. Been looking for something like this for a long time. It’s a kind of low level evolution simulation. I’ve got tons of ideas for my own simulation again. Very inspiring.

  • @bevo65
    @bevo65 3 роки тому +1

    I'd "like" this a thousand times if I could.

  • @AtomicBlastPony
    @AtomicBlastPony 5 років тому +1

    The Homogeneity randomizer seems to be the best so far. The first time I tried it I got red balls with purple edges, which had a few green particles in a circle around them some distance away. When two of these collided, the result was an EXPLOSION which sent particles flying all across the screen, and then the remains of the two balls split into like 5-6 smaller balls. I saved the parameters.

  • @FrostMonolith
    @FrostMonolith 3 роки тому +2

    If this in some way exists back then, this would be the most underrated screensaver ever.

  • @wesleydellinger4344
    @wesleydellinger4344 5 років тому +1

    I am soooo glad youtube recommended this channel. The videos are fantastic!

  • @dog-ez2nu
    @dog-ez2nu 3 роки тому

    The fundamentals of life is always fascinating to me - the idea that you can have an organism which thinks, has a 'being' and 'self', and does complicated actions - based on a huge Rube Goldberg of small, tiny mechanisms IS INSANE. We really are organic machines.

  • @rolininthemud
    @rolininthemud 5 років тому +11

    You always make the coolest stuff

  • @FerdiTheSecond
    @FerdiTheSecond 6 місяців тому +1

    Damn. I can't imagine how complex this could get with features such as machine learning, reproduction, need for resources (for example food, which would turn out to create herbivores, carnivores, and omnivores) etc. This has incredible potential!

  • @-_Nuke_-
    @-_Nuke_- 5 років тому +1

    CodeParade your creation is actually really poetic - as it actually does represent life even in our everyday scale: As we move in life, being repealed by some, attracted by others, chased by some others and chasing some others ourselves...

  • @exendrawrrens9157
    @exendrawrrens9157 5 років тому

    I just found your videos and they are amazing in a game design, programming and scientific perspective :^D since i love those things things.
    i really love to learn and see cool different stuff and your vids fit in right there, thanx for making them, made my night better ;'^) and keep up the hard work

  • @joshuahunt8911
    @joshuahunt8911 5 років тому +1

    I love your videos! Both informative and chill.

  • @keterpatrol7527
    @keterpatrol7527 5 років тому +3

    what i find rly common in particle life are what i call fusion and fission cells. they are when two big cells collide and they glitch, creating this very glitchy ball of particles. Fusion cells are when it doesnt spew out any particles, but is still very glitchy, and fission are when it does. Also, the particles they spew out (if they do) usually create new cells (collections of particles)

  • @tempname8263
    @tempname8263 5 років тому

    In the name of all existing! I had not been so shocked and excited like I am right now for months!
    You have NO idea how much I enjoy evolving N-body systems

  • @samvdheisteeg
    @samvdheisteeg 5 років тому

    It seems your channel is blowing up, great for you! Great informative videos on how fractals can be applied btw. I am thinking about their usefulness in protein engineering, molecular dynamics and synthetic biology, since I probably want to master in one of these topics as a third year biomedical engineering student, right now.

  • @feynstein1004
    @feynstein1004 5 років тому +2

    This is a really interesting concept. I wish to see more of this in the future.

  • @jerrylou9285
    @jerrylou9285 Місяць тому +1

    R.I.P John Conway

  • @bloodypommelstudios7144
    @bloodypommelstudios7144 3 роки тому +5

    Would be interesting seeing this with Brownian motion added to the mix or 3D with gravity.
    Perhaps permeability could lead to some interesting emergent behaviors such as cell formation.

  • @zhatar4214
    @zhatar4214 5 років тому +1

    man I love this channel so much, keep it up

  • @ziggyzoggin
    @ziggyzoggin 2 роки тому

    I love the motion blur on the particles!

  • @The_Foreman
    @The_Foreman 5 років тому +3

    Second creature, Typically uses a yellow body, and a pair of wing like appendages. Pink particles are typically used as tail feathers and a single red or green head. Due to the lesser particle count needed for the creature multiple can be found at a given moment. Despite their bird like apearence, They cannot flock, as they tend to collide either exploding into a shower of particles ore merging creating a larger faster bird. These larger birds tend to collect further eventually resulting in massive explosions resetting the system.

  • @onlyguitar1001
    @onlyguitar1001 3 роки тому +1

    This is also how i view the universe, not exactly a fractal but a kind of cellular automaton that generates fractals. Awesome video bro, physicists and computer scientists need to work together to create better simulations like this

  • @TimothyDavison
    @TimothyDavison 5 років тому

    This is connected to swarm intelligence (like boids). You mention biological molecules. Many students have a misconception that molecules interact via a lock-and-key model. Molecular interactions are driven by random movements and the probability that two species of molecules will interact (when close), depending on their current conformation. Your particle life, with its interaction vectors, does indeed have a connection to molecular biology, as you pointed out! Nice work. This is an interesting channel!

  • @Captain8Cake
    @Captain8Cake 5 років тому +592

    ""The universe is based on simple rules"
    Somebody didn't learn Quantum Physics.

    • @neomarrodriguez9255
      @neomarrodriguez9255 5 років тому +47

      That's because, WE NEED TO GO DEEPER!

    • @nuadathesilverhand3563
      @nuadathesilverhand3563 5 років тому +43

      I mean, thats pretty simple too: a very small particle could be in a given place. It could also be in an infinite number of other given places. really though its in all of those places, and none of them. see? just three sentences!

    • @CodeParade
      @CodeParade  5 років тому +285

      I did take Quantum Physics :P I still say field equations are relatively simple. It's just that when we try to analyze the behavior at higher levels and formulate what's going on with a bunch of formulas that things start getting difficult. It's like the Game of Life, the cell rules are easy, but try analyzing the structures and behaviors that emerge from those rules! That's where the complexity comes in!

    • @joost199207
      @joost199207 5 років тому +17

      Well it probably is because it can only be 100% logical, we just don't understand it yet.
      It's like saying subtracting two numbers is NOT based on simple rules because a baby can't understand it.

    • @ARBB1
      @ARBB1 5 років тому +25

      Quantum Physics *is* based on simple rules. In fact, quantum physics is a extremely natural and reasonable way for _any_ universe to function.
      The best read on this is by RC Henry's paper on the subject, _Quantum Mechanics made Transparent_ , 1990.
      aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.16277
      It discusses how on a universe, when you have a particle and you want to find properties about it with no specific information given, quantum physics arises naturally. It goes on to define Hilbert Spaces, operators and even derive the time-dependant and independent Schroedinger equation in a delightful way.

  • @OrangeC7
    @OrangeC7 5 років тому +5

    I would've never thought of something like this!

  • @MetroAndroid
    @MetroAndroid 2 роки тому +6

    It would be cool to see the game of life adapted to 3D space with voxels.

    • @o_sch
      @o_sch 2 роки тому

      done many times before

  • @deoxyplasmic
    @deoxyplasmic 3 роки тому

    The movement seems so natural! So... organic.

  • @nonsensicalhumanoid
    @nonsensicalhumanoid 2 роки тому

    A lot of cells (mainly the ones I've been seeing in random configuration for clusters) tend to form walls around themselves.
    This makes them efficient at keeping out other cells and occasionally consuming a particle or two in order to expand.
    As an example, I'm seeing this type of "ship", which can recover from most damage. There's also this type of still blob that has a forcefield of yellow/greens. The ship ends up steering itself into the still blobs. The ship does seem to consume a few particles, but the still blob's forcefield repels the ship.

  • @RaskaTheFurry
    @RaskaTheFurry 4 роки тому +1

    simple rules make complex rules and those make more complex rules that we are abiding by.

  • @tttreyflip17
    @tttreyflip17 3 роки тому +1

    I love this so much. Thank you.

  • @peterwalkington1412
    @peterwalkington1412 5 років тому +1

    Thank you for making this video. This is amazing

  • @piggi5xtheawesome973
    @piggi5xtheawesome973 5 років тому +2

    You sir, have inspired me to make a sandbox/life simulation game in the future.

  • @The_Foreman
    @The_Foreman 5 років тому +2

    Idk how but I've created a pair of very interesting creatures. The first uses pink particles for its head, followed by a series of greenish yellow and red stripes. The other uses yellow as its head, followed by a dotted blue pattern with each dot having 2 teal dots on either side between them.
    Both creatures use the same method of locomotion. The head is pulling from the body, but the larger size of the attracting body causes it to "catch up". The larger the head, the faster the worm. This becomes a problem for the blue worm because it's head is made of the red-ish worms body, so it rarely gains much speed. Meanwhile the redish worm is zooming across the screen.

  • @Fregmazors
    @Fregmazors 3 роки тому +1

    I downloaded this an it's absolutely amazing! I think my favorite is Chaos, because it generates these semi-stable objects that collide and EXPLODE, only to reform into different clusters.

  • @dudeareyoucrazy202
    @dudeareyoucrazy202 5 років тому +1

    I don't think I've ever been more excited to download something off of the internet

  • @tobenamed610
    @tobenamed610 3 роки тому +1

    I played with it until I found one where all the yellow and blue particles clump up, and then some of the pink ones cluster around that. It's actually really cool. If these clumps are given enough time, they can take other particles and turn into *really* interesting shapes - which doesn't happen often because these clumps are always smashing into each other and going absolutely nuts, which is also incredibly entertaining.
    Something I've noticed while playing with this is basically each particle has rules as to how it reacts with things. Some are attracted to everything, others are repelled by everything, some are attracted to certain others but keep a distance, etc. So each and every particle reacts differently with each other. When two particles come together they become one unit which reacts to others based on the rules that the two individual particles have, which makes for some incredibly interesting reactions with others.
    For example, let's say we have three particles; red, green and yellow. Green and yellow are attracted to each other, so they become a unit, but they both have different interactions with red. Green is attracted to red, and yellow is repelled by red. So when the unit comes across one yellow pulls away and so does red, but green tries to get to red; the result is they all become 'one' - because with the way green and yellow are reacting with red, they keep each other in place.
    All you need to do to make different behaviors is to tamper with the rules or properties of each particle. And I love that so much.

  • @aaronanderson9058
    @aaronanderson9058 5 років тому +1

    Your channel is fantastic! I'm sad it took me so long to find!

  • @AltairBlue
    @AltairBlue 4 роки тому +5

    *"This was inspired by jeffery ventrella's clusters."* Me playing DarwinPond while watching this: somebody recognized this? *Hol' Up*

  • @MrSplonger
    @MrSplonger 5 років тому

    This channel is amazing.

  • @yeahorightbro
    @yeahorightbro 5 років тому

    Mate I watch a lot of UA-cam.. but this channel is legit! So Good!

  • @rioppp7855
    @rioppp7855 4 роки тому +1

    Rest in peace conway 😓✌🏻

  • @VtinMusic
    @VtinMusic 2 роки тому +1

    We need this as a screensaver

  • @jaidenlang4991
    @jaidenlang4991 5 років тому

    Earned yourself a sub! This is awesome!

  • @da_xbox360
    @da_xbox360 3 роки тому +1

    dani is taking notes

  • @Blockinger
    @Blockinger 3 роки тому

    Underrated Channel.

  • @tomtheravenclaw8661
    @tomtheravenclaw8661 5 років тому +2

    Wow! This video was PARTICULARLY interesting

  • @fabiobauer7754
    @fabiobauer7754 5 років тому +1

    This channel will grow so fast I bet

  • @vehicleboi5598
    @vehicleboi5598 Рік тому +1

    particle life. 50% particle, 50% life.

  • @espen990
    @espen990 5 років тому +1

    I'd love to see a follow-up video where you take a look at specific structures and find out how they work. Some of the bigger, more complex structures seem to show symmetry and stuff.

  • @Shango
    @Shango 2 роки тому +1

    Sometimes I feel like a little purple dot floating in a sea of chaos.

  • @stevepittman3770
    @stevepittman3770 5 років тому

    This is very cool. I'd love to see you revisit this at some point and add reactions between various particles (simple chemistry) to turn into other particles.

  • @VoidSec3
    @VoidSec3 3 роки тому +1

    Bro this feels good

  • @dcterr1
    @dcterr1 3 роки тому

    Very cool - I need to check this out!

  • @absolutedogy346
    @absolutedogy346 5 років тому

    Wow, I love your video style and quick and interesting projects! I imagine each of these videos takes such a disproportionate amount of time to make with how much work goes into showing such neat little programs. What is your language of choice for these projects? I notice that this one at least was written in CPP, is there any particular reason you chose that over something like python? just comfort? Thanks for the entertainment you put out! seeing these is really inspiring me to try getting into making videos for my little projects and putting them out there for people!

  • @longrangeshotgun4321
    @longrangeshotgun4321 4 роки тому +1

    Dang this looks awesome

  • @divijvora3762
    @divijvora3762 2 роки тому +1

    Imagine it as a desktop wallpaper!

  • @applebanana6149
    @applebanana6149 5 років тому +1

    Very cool! I'm making that as my screen saver :)

  • @thegoodthebadandtheugly579
    @thegoodthebadandtheugly579 4 роки тому +1

    Interesting to understand ‘emerging properties’ from this simulation..

  • @clockworkkirlia7475
    @clockworkkirlia7475 3 роки тому

    Beautiful stuff!

  • @mgetommy
    @mgetommy 5 років тому

    so cool. Love this

  • @Jar.Headed
    @Jar.Headed 3 роки тому +1

    Actualy , both particles would interact the same if they have the same power of atraction (EX: red has atraction 1 on blue and blue has -1 on red so it will repel red) both of them would interact the same as if they had no atraction / repulsion at all , but if blue had for example -0.5 atraction , it would experience half the atraction by red . So it wouldn't be a chase

  • @NonisLuck
    @NonisLuck 5 років тому +1

    Just found yout channel. Excelent content

  • @TheAprone
    @TheAprone 5 років тому

    I've been watching a pretty neat little assembly of cells. These clumps of purple, orange, and red cells would wander the screen with a few cyan colored "moons" orbiting them. They would absorb more of those colors as they passed, growing in size. Most of the blue specs would slowly avoid them, but every now and then one would impact with enough force to breach the outer (red) layer. The inner color must hate blue because it would violently pop and split the whole thing in half. Sometimes it would merge back together a moment later, but more often one of the "moons" would orbit into the middle and cause each half to rearrange into mini versions of the original. Each half would go it's separate way eating and growing, until eventually a blue would divide them again. If there was a constant resupply of the random background dots, I imagine these would have continued to eat and multiply. It was very neat to watch.

  • @garyshannon1424
    @garyshannon1424 5 років тому

    This looked so familiar to me, then I remembered why: Scientific American, September 1987, Computer Recreations Column; "Diverse personalities search for social equilibrium at a computer party" by A.K. Dewdney. I had to dig through a mountain of back issues of SciAm to find it, but there it is. It's available online, for a price, or better yet, check your local library for back issues. In his version, the dots were guests at a party that each had a preferred distance for each other guest. The main difference is that there was only one of each guest, or, equivalently, one dot of each color.

  • @DreadedEgg
    @DreadedEgg 2 роки тому +1

    This is so cool. One thought I've had is that some interesting configurations get stuck on the border wall. Perhaps you would consider making this region continuous, carrying over to the opposite side of the screen like old arcade games? Love this stuff.
    Edit: To give a bit more clarity, it seems that configurations with linear movements inevitably end up stuck against the artificial constraint of the border, remaining in the middle space only those with rotational movement. This effectively separates everything into distinct bubbles which never again interact.

  • @h-Films
    @h-Films 4 роки тому +1

    Natural selection actually appears in this!

  • @deede963
    @deede963 Рік тому +1

    The perfect screensaver xD

  • @joops110
    @joops110 5 років тому

    Why do you only have 10k subs? I love your videos!

  • @TheRealToaster2
    @TheRealToaster2 5 років тому +1

    I came across this channel yesterday and I am LOVING IT. Particle life and the marble marcher games are ideas that I have thought about making into a game for a long time. I am shocked that something like this already exists.
    I love fractals, cellular automaton, 4D space, and AI learning.

  • @_fragment
    @_fragment 3 роки тому +1

    This has given me enough inspiratiion to start a custom nature simulator, of sorts, where instead of simple rules, it's based on survival. I'll come back to this comment when I make some progress.

  • @vamshivams5029
    @vamshivams5029 5 років тому

    You have amazing content

  • @qbblast
    @qbblast 5 років тому

    Incredible.

  • @mykolask
    @mykolask 4 роки тому +1

    we need a user friendly, interactive version of this :D

  • @Zi7ar21
    @Zi7ar21 5 років тому +2

    +1 for motion blur

  • @Kitsudote
    @Kitsudote 5 років тому +1

    That's awesome! Think I have to code this myself, just for fun :)

  • @NuncNuncNuncNunc
    @NuncNuncNuncNunc 4 роки тому +1

    It might be interesting to see particles, each with potentially different attributes, like A is attracted to B on one side but repelled on the other. Also add in some random rotation.

  • @WildAnimalChannel
    @WildAnimalChannel 5 років тому

    Interesting indeed. Not often I see something new these days!

  • @michaelstout7955
    @michaelstout7955 3 роки тому

    I hope we can see this as a mobile game someday soon. It would be an awesome time killer.

  • @swamihuman9395
    @swamihuman9395 4 роки тому +1

    Very nice. Thx.

  • @drsquash2003
    @drsquash2003 5 років тому

    If this simulation was robust enough, it could be a wonderful demonstration of how evolution works, and how RNA and DNA can lead to more complex life