Thanks for all the helpful comments and feedback. Please keep them coming. I need them! Please help me on style, title and cover art by filling in this short survey forms.microsoft.com/r/FYdLFhUQrc
I'm using an iPad Gen 9, and sometimes when I open Excalidraw files that already have imported PDFs, the app crashes-possibly due to insufficient RAM. As a result, the data in some of the Excalidraw tabs I had open at the time gets completely erased. I lost all my notes from three hours of work because of this issue. I hope you can fix this bug in future updates. Thank you-you’re doing a great job!
Just note or rather a worry, people are here because of you, your personality and insights. If you merge to much stuff via AI I fear your book could turn into a frankenstein monster of different creators, were a consistent style is missing. Which might happen because of the harsh time limit. And its funny that "tiny experiment" is up there already, while not being out for another month :D
Thank you! I assure you that the ideas in the book (if/when published) will be original, will be mine, will be impactful and new... or else I will not publish it. I'd frame "The Frankenstein's Monster" risk slightly differently: I have so many ideas that staying on topic (actually finding the topic) is extremely difficult. I guess this is one reason I like visual thinking, I am not very good at the straightjacket of linear text - as in a book. As for Tiny Experiment, I was looking for book covers that my community will likely see and might want to read. In this regard, I am not interested in its content only the cover design.
@@VisualPKM My idea of the Frankenstein Monster was more in the direction of mixing the writing/wording style of different authors. Not about the content. But the point you bring up, with mixing to many ideas, concepts, stuff to talk about is valid as well. Going down to a few topics but going deep with them, exploring them in depth is better, than having 100 topics in a superficial way. Another mistake that happens nowadays is that authors just say the same thing in different way through the entire book. Were after the 3. chapter nothing new is to be learned. But i dont think that will apply to this book ;) I have no clue, if Tiny Experiment is going to be any good. From the newsletter from the author potential is definitely there.
Thanks for all the helpful comments and feedback. Please keep them coming. I need them!
Please help me on style, title and cover art by filling in this short survey forms.microsoft.com/r/FYdLFhUQrc
I'm using an iPad Gen 9, and sometimes when I open Excalidraw files that already have imported PDFs, the app crashes-possibly due to insufficient RAM. As a result, the data in some of the Excalidraw tabs I had open at the time gets completely erased. I lost all my notes from three hours of work because of this issue. I hope you can fix this bug in future updates. Thank you-you’re doing a great job!
This is really an interesting experiment! Thanks for sharing!
Just note or rather a worry, people are here because of you, your personality and insights. If you merge to much stuff via AI I fear your book could turn into a frankenstein monster of different creators, were a consistent style is missing. Which might happen because of the harsh time limit.
And its funny that "tiny experiment" is up there already, while not being out for another month :D
Thank you! I assure you that the ideas in the book (if/when published) will be original, will be mine, will be impactful and new... or else I will not publish it. I'd frame "The Frankenstein's Monster" risk slightly differently: I have so many ideas that staying on topic (actually finding the topic) is extremely difficult. I guess this is one reason I like visual thinking, I am not very good at the straightjacket of linear text - as in a book.
As for Tiny Experiment, I was looking for book covers that my community will likely see and might want to read. In this regard, I am not interested in its content only the cover design.
@@VisualPKM My idea of the Frankenstein Monster was more in the direction of mixing the writing/wording style of different authors. Not about the content.
But the point you bring up, with mixing to many ideas, concepts, stuff to talk about is valid as well. Going down to a few topics but going deep with them, exploring them in depth is better, than having 100 topics in a superficial way.
Another mistake that happens nowadays is that authors just say the same thing in different way through the entire book. Were after the 3. chapter nothing new is to be learned. But i dont think that will apply to this book ;)
I have no clue, if Tiny Experiment is going to be any good. From the newsletter from the author potential is definitely there.