Introduction to LTI Systems

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • An explanation of how an LTI (Linear Time-Invariant) system is completely specified in terms of its impulse response, transfer function, or frequency response. The relationship between impulse response, transfer function, and frequency response is also explained.
    This video is one in a series of videos being created to support EGR 433:Transforms & Systems Modeling at Arizona State University. Links to the other videos can be found at sites.google.co...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @mohamedramadanmohamed3744
    @mohamedramadanmohamed3744 6 років тому +1

    Really you don't know how thankful i'm for you Professor Morrell.

  • @thomaslewis9526
    @thomaslewis9526 11 місяців тому

    I learned this more than twenty years ago, and it still mostly confuses the hell out of me.
    But if you plug the correct time functions into the convolution formula and follow the rules of integration, you can get the right answer. And, you can always check it with Laplace/inverse- Laplace transforms.
    Having a clear intuitive understanding of what is going on, that is a whole different level of effort.
    These straight-forward worked examples, will help, especially if you are new to convolution.

  • @yichizhang795
    @yichizhang795 10 років тому +1

    A million of thanks from Sydney

  • @DarrylMorrell
    @DarrylMorrell  12 років тому +2

    If the output is the same as the input (y = x), then the system impulse response is a delta function and the system transfer function is 1.

  • @GY9944
    @GY9944 7 років тому

    Great videos ! Made me understand this subject a tad more than I previously did. Thanks !

  • @amandafalke7670
    @amandafalke7670 9 років тому +7

    Great work Professor Morrell! I wish you were my circuits teacher.

  • @mhsunny123
    @mhsunny123 9 років тому +1

    thanks for the video. Not many engineering video out there

  • @leocmen
    @leocmen 13 років тому

    Very good vides Mr. Morrell, thanks a lot for posting that.

  • @hhorace100
    @hhorace100 12 років тому

    And to think I looked stupid in class because of this. Thanks a great deal.

  • @real0mar
    @real0mar 5 років тому

    This taught me as much as my 60 minute lecture on the same topic...

  • @LifeReDiscovery
    @LifeReDiscovery 12 років тому +1

    Well done, Darry! Thanks a lot.

  • @ngup1000
    @ngup1000 4 роки тому

    omg this is such a clear video thanks a lot

  • @EdgarParedes.127
    @EdgarParedes.127 12 років тому

    Thank you, this clarifies their relation.

  • @princeshah6444
    @princeshah6444 8 років тому +3

    awesome...sir...

  • @MB-tt5ms
    @MB-tt5ms 8 років тому

    Thank you for this videos.

  • @DarrylMorrell
    @DarrylMorrell  12 років тому

    @squarepusher303 No, the relationship is the same. In my experience, about half the textbooks use just omega, and half use jw. It is up to you (or your instructor or other authority figure) what you use.

  • @RWD_Faiz
    @RWD_Faiz 12 років тому

    Thanx from Melbourne :)

  • @sirelegant2002
    @sirelegant2002 9 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @uandhimanshu1
    @uandhimanshu1 11 років тому

    dear sir thanx for such an easy explaination of this difficult topic. but i am facing problem in finding the limit of integration and graphing . please take complicated problems of sinusoidal and sinc function.

  • @annau7551
    @annau7551 2 роки тому

    hard topic, nice explanation

  • @karimkhan1312
    @karimkhan1312 11 років тому

    UNIQUE LECTURE

  • @bruninie
    @bruninie 8 років тому

    So the impulse response is just the behaviour of an ouput when the input is given a big impulse?

  • @squarepusher303
    @squarepusher303 13 років тому

    In my book the Fourier relation is given as H(w)=Y(w)/X(w) i.e. without the j attached to the w (omega). Is that relationship in any way different from what you've described in this video?

  • @jeenasir4820
    @jeenasir4820 11 років тому

    may I know..how to calculate two system that connected in parallel..what is the formula?..is it same as cascade?..

  • @firzathereds
    @firzathereds 12 років тому

    Heyy,, if i have linear graphic x=y, how to make it transfer function in laplace?

  • @ujjvalpatel5353
    @ujjvalpatel5353 7 років тому +2

    I think you are Left handed ? is it correct ?

  • @DrMaillard
    @DrMaillard 7 років тому

    Fantastic lecture, thank you for your time. Minor comment: you are pronouncing asterisk as asterix!

  • @squarepusher303
    @squarepusher303 12 років тому

    @DarrylMorrell Thanks!

  • @sharperguy
    @sharperguy 13 років тому

    We've done this before at my uni but they never even mentioned the term 'LTI system'

  • @sauravti
    @sauravti 3 роки тому

    Coollllllllllllllllllllllll😎

  • @lightspeed79
    @lightspeed79 12 років тому

    I wish this could have been explained this well when I took linear system analysis course, i would have probably got an A! damnit, I see it wasn't all my fault, these profesors don't explain well!

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 3 роки тому

    In short: 11:28

  • @thevoid141
    @thevoid141 7 років тому +1

    7:38 lol

  • @sj_coder
    @sj_coder 9 років тому +1

    just look the subtitles..........its funny............calling h(t) as 850..........and others too.

  • @princeshah6444
    @princeshah6444 8 років тому +2

    awesome...sir...