Feel the same but on the other hand he might have doubled with the aq hand. Think he would have played that hand (if not on the bubble while people had a piece of the action). This would have set him more comfortable for the streak of bad hands he had afterwards.
Used to play split/short deck from 7 to Ace (2,3,4,5,6 removed from deck) draw poker when I was a teenager back in Dublin Ireland. 4 players limit, 32 cards so just enough if everyone asks for 3 cards. Had a lot of fun. Hard to adjust back to full deck 7 card stud that we also played
I love listening and watching these old streams while I work and laugh how people are telling Daniel how to play when he has nearly 50 million in tourney winnings and more logged hands then most the people combined in the chat 😂
Daniel is the bomb ... keeps it real, playin' online short deck on vaca w/ his wife and talkin' Romanian food and dissing crappy NFTs ... I luv it, keep keepin' it real Daniel, and thanks for welcoming us into your world. peace bruh
Can anyone explain the reasoning behind only using one stack at a time and not 2 or all 3 at once? Especially when it's near the end of late reg and 1 stack is only like 13 bigs?
@@hellerjet8630 I would think you want a bigger stack to get more chips with your all ins but I'm assuming this is wrong because these players are on a much higher level of play then I am I just play $40-$100 tourneys.
hey my big time fav, any advice to play against fishers :) , i feel i often gets called by some random hands and drawn dead even before the tournement realy starts
I honestly dont know if the QT high call was winning or not because u didnt consider that yes he has draws but when u check river u also lose to some of his bluffs like k9 hearts which might check back but not always and turning jx into bluff to fold out kk etc and unless you know the opponent wont bluff KQ hearts etc then in my opinion which isnt that great i admit but i think when u lose to bluffs even its a fold when u also take into consider he has 8888 AJ and other Ax small kicker, dont think it can be winning call for 3/4 pot, would like to know experts opinions, because expert i am not at short deck that is, even 8x bets river IP after u check although dont know what 8x wants to get called by but if u hero QT high then 8x is a value bet IP after aggressor checks, i suppose its all player dependant???? Could someone please correct the errors in my analysis, thanks guys and have a lovely day
At 30.40 its bad ship against the PFR with top 2 when 6 pairs because he is behind to your range too many hands beat him that why your call is prob winning because he shouldnt be shoving JT now so knowing that population dont ship top two and he dont have many 6x or boats so he just has way more bluff combos than value, so it has to be a call, he obv domt understand the game
@Daniel Negreanu - Hey Daniel, I've noticed during several hands when you have the nuts on the flop that you bet when first to act. The pre-flop pots I've seen are pretty small to. I'm interested in that reasoning as opposed to checking, and letting the other player/s bet. Every hand that I've seen you bet into the nuts, the other person has folded. If you have the nuts, wouldn't it make more sense to check and let them bet or at least bluff? Seem like you could get paid off a little more. I feel like a noob poker player, and I'm still learning more modern game theory after being away from the game for 10 years. Appreciate your streams and listening to your thought process as you play! 🤜🤛
im no pro but im pretty sure this is the case because if he checked it everytime he had the nuts he would be easy to read, and not always the opponent will have a hand thats bluff worthy, hes doing it to mask his weak hands and his strong hands so that its harder to tell if he has it or not, that way if he bets on the flop he could be doing it with shit or with the nuts, so if the opponent has decent equity he will call a lot more, players rarely fold flop now unless they have absolutely nothing
it seems like you still have the exact same chances of hitting a flush. for instance if you need the river to be a certain suit, you still have a 1 in 4 chance of that even though thre are less of each suit
The ratios change because while the number of cards in the deck shrinks the number of cards in a complete hand, whole cards, and community cards remain the same
@@jbachman01 youre righr but still the difference between 16% and 19% (which of course just one example of how ha flush hand can play out) isnt big enough in my opinion to warrant daniels attitude here of "a flush is basically never gonna happen so dont worry about it". but obviously he is more likely correct than i am
@@OGRE_HATES_NERDS I don’t think it changes either of the numbers I found earlier. If you have four known cards and need one more for the flush I don’t think it matters if you have one in your hand and three on the board or two in your hand and two on the board.
At the start you were talking about the size of peoples decks, its only how you use your deck that counts, i thought you were playing poker not comparing dcks anyway?
Waste of time if you don't have a huge bankroll and something tangible to fall back on, even pro sports players have degrees etc to fall back on. I'd imagine 99 percent people trying to play poker don't and waste valuable time to educate themselves. Good luck watching how other people live lol
![2024 WSOP Online - Main Event [Final Table], $29,193,500 Prize Pool with Jeff Gross & Phil Laak](/img/n.gif)
Daniel, great video! Thank you so much. I have been following your game on and off for 20 years.
Hey Daniel, GG. Just gotta say, seeing you lay low so that your "minvestors" make a profit is very classy, and I'm not one.
Feel the same but on the other hand he might have doubled with the aq hand. Think he would have played that hand (if not on the bubble while people had a piece of the action). This would have set him more comfortable for the streak of bad hands he had afterwards.
Used to play split/short deck from 7 to Ace (2,3,4,5,6 removed from deck) draw poker when I was a teenager back in Dublin Ireland. 4 players limit, 32 cards so just enough if everyone asks for 3 cards. Had a lot of fun. Hard to adjust back to full deck 7 card stud that we also played
Nobody here understand s what you just explained
@@thebroughamshow6985 Do you understand what I said? I edited my post.
I love listening and watching these old streams while I work and laugh how people are telling Daniel how to play when he has nearly 50 million in tourney winnings and more logged hands then most the people combined in the chat 😂
short deck is the bomb... thank you daniel, so digging this ... as well as ivey's triton action, fantastic! peace
Daniel is the bomb ... keeps it real, playin' online short deck on vaca w/ his wife and talkin' Romanian food and dissing crappy NFTs ... I luv it, keep keepin' it real Daniel, and thanks for welcoming us into your world. peace bruh
Remember folks, it's not the size of the deck, it's how you use it.
Wow , aren't you clever . 12 years old?
never knew you played short deck at all! cool stuff!
Woah. GG.. that was intense. Never seen short deck before.
Took me way to long to realize that this isnt holdem hhahaah
daniel u are a original legend
thanks for sharing this with us
wish u all the best
57:00. Dan woulda killed 2 hands in a row with straight,s. 97 s. Even look pretty with this format.
@3:13:00 how does the Ace count as a wild card??? I've never heard of this.
its not a wild, A in shord deck play(6to A cards only) counts as a 5 and an Ace, also flush is stronger then full house in this format
I thought you played a little timid on the bubble.
The water part made me laugh
Can anyone explain the reasoning behind only using one stack at a time and not 2 or all 3 at once? Especially when it's near the end of late reg and 1 stack is only like 13 bigs?
insurance against a losing all in.
@@hellerjet8630 I would think you want a bigger stack to get more chips with your all ins but I'm assuming this is wrong because these players are on a much higher level of play then I am I just play $40-$100 tourneys.
how do you get a piece of Dnegs?
Daniel calls a bet on the river with Queen high. Then he folds Jacks and 10s preflop 😂
28:00
2:26:40 😂😂👌🏼 you got so lucky
How do you see the live earnings of the players
Hi sir love from India.. i am your huge fan..lots of love❤❤
I really want to play some short deck poker now. Looks like a ton of fun!
4:55:35 wait, whaaaa? Did DNegs have a brain fart? Since when does an Ace-high flush beat a full house?
its short deck flushes beat boats
@@ComedyCarouselLive oh wow, had no idea. Thanks.
hey my big time fav, any advice to play against fishers :) , i feel i often gets called by some random hands and drawn dead even before the tournement realy starts
In first hour dont think i see anyone show down AA? Which obviously way more likely in SD
feels like low stakes wsop app all in every hand lol
2:23:31 bruh what is this fold
lol, how do you like seing your face with the emotes
56:30
Game wasnt broking. Dnegs play was broken imho. Although he stayed mentally strong which i respect
How can the j 10 fold be correct ?
I honestly dont know if the QT high call was winning or not because u didnt consider that yes he has draws but when u check river u also lose to some of his bluffs like k9 hearts which might check back but not always and turning jx into bluff to fold out kk etc and unless you know the opponent wont bluff KQ hearts etc then in my opinion which isnt that great i admit but i think when u lose to bluffs even its a fold when u also take into consider he has 8888 AJ and other Ax small kicker, dont think it can be winning call for 3/4 pot, would like to know experts opinions, because expert i am not at short deck that is, even 8x bets river IP after u check although dont know what 8x wants to get called by but if u hero QT high then 8x is a value bet IP after aggressor checks, i suppose its all player dependant???? Could someone please correct the errors in my analysis, thanks guys and have a lovely day
Hey checking the Full House?
Just like PLO card removal/ blockers and un blockers are surely way more important in this game ???
Yesss
1:53:20
When you gives million$ advices for free♥️♥️♥️♥️
2:12:00
omg, he fucking folded A Q aginst player who went in the last 3 min 3 times all in.....very bad!!! tight scared!!
Only play I disagreed with but he played well overall.
Doing good Negs keep it go'in man
Someone needs to show Dan how to edit.
At 30.40 its bad ship against the PFR with top 2 when 6 pairs because he is behind to your range too many hands beat him that why your call is prob winning because he shouldnt be shoving JT now so knowing that population dont ship top two and he dont have many 6x or boats so he just has way more bluff combos than value, so it has to be a call, he obv domt understand the game
Wow man stop playing scared. He’s naming every hand ! He jammed on top of a raise with Q8
Is it panned or pammed? Pam or pan
@Daniel Negreanu - Hey Daniel, I've noticed during several hands when you have the nuts on the flop that you bet when first to act. The pre-flop pots I've seen are pretty small to.
I'm interested in that reasoning as opposed to checking, and letting the other player/s bet.
Every hand that I've seen you bet into the nuts, the other person has folded. If you have the nuts, wouldn't it make more sense to check and let them bet or at least bluff? Seem like you could get paid off a little more.
I feel like a noob poker player, and I'm still learning more modern game theory after being away from the game for 10 years. Appreciate your streams and listening to your thought process as you play! 🤜🤛
im no pro but im pretty sure this is the case because if he checked it everytime he had the nuts he would be easy to read, and not always the opponent will have a hand thats bluff worthy, hes doing it to mask his weak hands and his strong hands so that its harder to tell if he has it or not, that way if he bets on the flop he could be doing it with shit or with the nuts, so if the opponent has decent equity he will call a lot more, players rarely fold flop now unless they have absolutely nothing
@@sebofon7214 Gotcha, thanks for the insight.
1 of the best
Not at short deck clearly 😂
99.99999 should go to trade schools and enjoy life's certainties .
109:20
G.O.A.T
НА 5Ч 31 МИН С А Д РАЗН . ПУК-ПУК!!!! СЫКЛИВЫМ СТАЛ ДЯДЯ!!!! ФОЛД НА ПУШ ОТМОРОЖЕННОГО МИШИ, А НА ФЛОПЕ А Д !!!
Ну ты их из за размера стека?
That Deny guy is so bad.. he played the lowest pair on a board with 2 pairs of higher cards. I don't even see bots in $1/2 doing this lol
You are awesome
FROM GEORGIA
it seems like you still have the exact same chances of hitting a flush. for instance if you need the river to be a certain suit, you still have a 1 in 4 chance of that even though thre are less of each suit
Check your math. NLHE River flush draw you have a 9/46 (19.5%) chance. Short deck you have a 5/30 (16%). How are you getting 1/4?
The ratios change because while the number of cards in the deck shrinks the number of cards in a complete hand, whole cards, and community cards remain the same
@@jbachman01 youre righr but still the difference between 16% and 19% (which of course just one example of how ha flush hand can play out) isnt big enough in my opinion to warrant daniels attitude here of "a flush is basically never gonna happen so dont worry about it". but obviously he is more likely correct than i am
@@jbachman01 if you have two suited hole cards, do you not have the same chances of flopping a flush in either game?
@@OGRE_HATES_NERDS I don’t think it changes either of the numbers I found earlier. If you have four known cards and need one more for the flush I don’t think it matters if you have one in your hand and three on the board or two in your hand and two on the board.
Who he raid
Dario sammartino the best
Like watching fucking grass growing
I like Negreanu for poker smarts even tho his wimpy vaxx politics punk him out.
DENEGS... PLEASE TRYING TO BE COOLD. YOUR DANCING MAKES ME WANT TO THROW UP...OTHER THAN THAT I LOVE YOUR POKER ANALYSIS AND SITE.
Short deck is such gambling.
Fearful !!!!!!!
Did anyone else want to reach through the screen and take that fking water bottle away from him.
Literally took 25 microscopic sips and it wasn’t empty
At the start you were talking about the size of peoples decks, its only how you use your deck that counts, i thought you were playing poker not comparing dcks anyway?
JJ was a call Dnegs
GG
Hello
i can make it(salata de vinete)
Wow
J8
存·100包赔100存1000包赔500
20
Dannie's play is too passive and fearful.
You should buy into that tourney and show him how to play....
sais the nobody
What a shit game. Plus, even if you make the money , you don’t even double your entry. And if you had two bullets, you lose money.
I don’t believe your less likely to get a flush . Your just more likely to get a full house . And thats why a flush beats full… right?
Waste of time if you don't have a huge bankroll and something tangible to fall back on, even pro sports players have degrees etc to fall back on. I'd imagine 99 percent people trying to play poker don't and waste valuable time to educate themselves. Good luck watching how other people live lol
2:38:40