I like insurance defense. You don't need to be an a--hole and can help the injured parties receive adequate compensation for their injuries. And you don't usually have to worry about getting paid, win or lose, although the rates are lower.
The case with the parent giving up the kids for furniture, could have been my biological father. He said he wouldn’t contest custody, or try for the house (that my mum solely paid for) - if he got mine and my sister beds (he claimed they were heirloom, but they weren’t) and $40k. Mum only agreed as long as he paid for new beds for us, and she made sure we didn’t get anything expensive. Even when he takes his kids beds away, my mum has more class
HOA dude: my mom used to be a legal secretary before she realized how much she hated desk work, and also before me or my full siblings were in the picture (almost 30 years ago). Part of that office’s job was dealing with this 1 HOA that foreclosed on a couple memorable houses. The first was a guy who’s lawn mower had broken and he was working all week long and hadn’t had time to fix it. He had communicated this with the HOA and said he would get his lawn cut as soon as possible. HOA wasn’t having it and foreclosed. Then another house was foreclosed because their garbage disposal wasn’t working. Now how did the HOA know it wasn’t working? They’re not allowed to go into your house. And this is why ever since I learned this I tell people you don’t have to join an HOA and they legally cannot refuse a sale if you refuse to join. Sure if there’s public resources for HOA members you won’t be able to access them, but HOA fees are ridiculous and the money you save from not joining can go to a gym or pool membership.
I love the way the text reader reads CRASH with the same intense level of inflection no matter what context the word is used, or how calmly the other words are read 😆
My divorce attorney told me to “Face it, he’s getting custody.” I pointed out that none of the kids were his and we had only been married for two years and he was an proven abuser and he just waved me out of his office. I was shocked. I knocked on his partner/boss’s office door, someone I’d known since I was a kid, and told him what had happened. He stood up and left the office then I heard very loud voices and then he returned with my file. He took over and I got my divorce and sole custody of the kids. Oh and a decade later the first lawyer became a judge and when I was appearing before him, as a representative/prosecutor for my employer’s legal cases, he would be borderline rude to me.
@@oldwoman5942 WTF THATS CRAZY!-- what was his problem with you? What a COMPLETE ASSHOLE. -when I was engaged to my (now) husband, his ex got all ticked and sent her attorney after ME (…like I was a home wrecker.) mind you, they divorce and custody had been finalized for at least 8-9months and I met him years after they’d separated. Anyhow her attorney was RIDICULOUS! I receive a discovery packet asking me “what business I had dating” my husband and asking me personal questions about my job at the time (granted I was being filmed for a reality show, assuming the ex thought I was making big bucks and she was entitled to it) Never completed the discovery packet of bullshit questions. Husband goes to court ( I wasn’t invited btw) her attorney opens with “your honor look at this whore!” …..it was a photo of me. I’m significantly better looking and younger than the ex wife, so naturally I’m a “whore”. Unbelievable. BTW- husband represented himself that day and judge sided with him 😊 never returned to court again.
I went in for a public transit hearing about the price difference between a student and a non-student transit ticket. The price difference is $5 and I was a broke college student. I showed up, with the transit ticket in question (it reads Student ticket) and was asked if I had a student ID. I did and ahowed it to the judge. The judge looked over the ticket and asked the officer who gave me the ticket if it is suppose to be an age restricted ticket (between 5-18 year old). The officer said yes. The judge dismissed the fine and charge as there was no age restriction listed on the ticket. Just that there are student and non-student tickets. Apparently it took the transportation company a year to change the prints on the tickets. They now specify age pricing tickets.
DUI people never learn. My former BIL’s step dad got caught driving drunk on 3 separate occasions, only had his license temporarily suspended because he needed it for his job, and as far as I’m aware it took the people threatening to revoke his green card and ship him back to Mexico for him to stop driving drunk. Didn’t stop the fool from inviting his buddies over to get drunk at his own daughter’s birthday parties, which is just a whole ‘nother issue in and of itself.
Not a Lawyer but we ran through hypothetical court cases of historical figures where two members of the class posed as the attorneys, teacher was the judge and the rest of the class was the jury. Each pair was given their person then had one day to prepare arguments based on what was known about them in history and the following day would have our 'court date'. When it was my turn to get an assignment the hypothetical scenario was if Hitler had been taken alive and brought to trial and I was going to be his defense. I looked the teacher in the face and calmly stated: "The only thing I will do to prepare for court will be to have a shirt made that says 'I would do my part to help my country but murder is illegal' and with God is my witness I will be proud to take that F and uniform suspension because my grandfather fought against fascism and so will I". The class cheered me on, making it very obvious what their judgment was going to be. Our person was changed and I don't even remember to who anymore because this was back in high school, but I still remember the shocked look on my teacher's face with how strongly I felt over being asked to defend Hitler and was willing to poison my jury over my beliefs.
I'm not a lawyer however when I went in for a custody hearing for my boys my ex's attorney proved my case that I needed to remain the custodial parent and needed a restraining order. He tried to run me off the road with my boys in the car then his attorney made the claim that because he was out of town the week after the incident he couldn't have possibly have been in town to do it...
Of all these stories, my favorites are the ones where opposing counsel just have the most half-witted leaps in logic and genuinely think they're making a good argument. Glad you got your boys
Right at the start of my career, I was the lawyer for a good looking woman in a divorce case, no children. We worked out an extremely, almost unbelievable, property settlement for my client. Some years later, I discovered that the reason that we got such a favorable settlement was that my client was sleeping with the husband's attorney during the course of the proceedings. I knew nothing about this at the time. I was shocked, especially at the conduct of the opposing attorney. I learned a few lessons from this, especially that I did not want to handle divorce cases, which I did not in the future. I had a similar case later, where the attorney got involved in a romantic relationship with his own client. He withdrew from the representation, which is an appropriate result, and subsequently married the client. They remained together until his death, decades later.
Restraining order case with my uncle was fun, ex girlfriend files and gets restraining order (it was on BS charges which the judge stated were bs in legalise several months later). My uncle is in his usual restaurant with friends when she shows up, he leaves to follow the order, gose to his favourite pub, she follows 30 minutes later, at this point he decides he won't leave, she screams at him to and when he refuses calls the police, two hours later she is in a cell as she had forgotten to read the order carefully, it's a two way order(they all are) since it was provable she did not regularly visit these place when he did and she followed him SHE had violated the order, two days later magistrate drops the order as my uncle shows that the order was requested for malicious reasons and community member vouch for him that the order won't be needed for him to avoid contact. The court case between them a few months later is a favourite family tale but can't be told on the internet as it has too much personal info
Yeah, they do it so people can't steal the content because these videos are so cookie cutter, anyone could do it. If two videos both have glitches they can just say "well mine had it first" As if anyone would steal this content anyway 🤣
Idk if this is in the video cause I'm not watching 3 hours of reddit videos, but I heard this one story about someone who had their wallet stolen. They said there was "x, y things in there" and the person accused said "actually there wasn't y in there, there was z" I cant remember exactly how it went but it lasted about 30 seconds.
If you ever get accused of flashing someone or being inappropriate and it’s one word against the other….. It’s not illegal to be naked in your own home. And it’s not illegal to have your curtains or blind open. It’s easier if you were on the first floor (above the one you walk in to) where the bedrooms are. You can be naked at your window watching birds outside. It’s not illegal. If claiming indecency- your looking up at the birds- they’re looking at you. ^this is if your on a residential road in a house or something. or apartment. If your watching the birds naked (NOT ILLEGAL) and they’re looking at you watching birds. Don’t make eye contact with them- if you do- you saw a bird/ butterfly/ something on the window. Don’t acknowledge the people or it’ll be harder to fight the case
the whole jury thing. atleast for the usa. why blame the freaking person when you straight up ask them a question and all that. LIke hello your at fault not the person. Take the extra day of work and just interview each person alone and not out in the open to taint everyone else.
Wait, in the case at 58:55 the boyfriend walked free when the girlfriend walked into court with all the injuries he was alleged of they make it sound obvious as to why it was thrown out and she was charged with contempt of court. What exactly is the reason? It sounds far more reasonable to continue the case and prove if the boyfriend caused those injuries, not throw it out and charge her with anything. 🤔
The one where the dude jacked then had to make the witness describe his size and confirm it with the Jury, I can’t tell if that was a pure alpha move or an intentional mockery of the justice system 😂
Wouldnt there have had to have actually been pot and ''m'' found in the defendant's vehicle in addition to the k9 unit "saying" that such substances were present? And if so, just the fact that a police officer says that thats where it came from is normally sufficient evidence to convict.
Wait, that one lawyer is having interns put together letters implying (or stating), lawsuits? A person's life shouldn't be homework! At the absolute minimum, it ruins your day. For those prone to anxiety, sky's the limit to how bad it could get. I hope I misunderstood.
you do miss understan the intern put to gether the document but the lawyer must review the document before it sent that it's correct, as it sent out in their name
There were several parts in here where they talked about context was not set correctly or contexts was missing altogether. It took me awhile because I'm extremely honest and people would twist things and nitpick certain words without the context to make me look bad. And then one of them was an individual that work say did you say it did you say it immediately after repeating something I said but did not say the entire statement which would have changed everything. So it wasn't until I heard a preacher make a comment that it is a lie to take things out of context and pick only portions of the statement which make the other argument valid. So therefore if the context is missing it is all right to say no that is a lie because it is, because without the context you didn't make that statement. And I ran in the same issue where an individual didn't want to hear the context. So rather than using my honesty against me while they'll sit there and lie I would just tell the truth, and It's upsetting a judge and some of these examples acted that way without context since you're supposed to State the whole truth, not a snippet of it. And for judge to act that way really hasn't believed they should not be on a bench.
Lmao... Pretty sure literally EVERYONE would not expect the judicial system to do basically anything truthfully or by the book... Lawyers are trained professional liar's.
Will / money stuff; always give everyone a specific amount EG £1 for daughter 1, son, daughter 2, and stepson ... or whatever.. Then they can't contest that they werent given anything, can't fight the will and can't say its unfair. if they all get the equal small amount. atleast this is my understanding of it... also I'd like a few quid from my nan/grandad and so on so i can buy something in remembrance of them, a garden angel, or a train, plane so on whatever is in reference to that specific person, otherwise I'm fine without the money.
Re the comment on the parmentry court case, not the US case isn't different. The direct comparison is the Marinda case, where a confestion gets though as non voltariary if you put the defended in a position where they don't think they have an option to remain silent. the old oath didn't give them a option to raimin silent (or the equvelnt of the line "I plead the 5th") hence wasn't a voltary confesstion
This vid shows how many bad , authoritarian ego fueled judges there are. When prople express their opinion in court, which they have every right to do (1st ammenment) they get thrown into jail for contempt of court aka contempt of judges ego. Disgusting
Lawyers are scum. "It's not your fault" even though you knew this drunk driver has a history of being trash and so you defend him. Yea it is your fault for getting him off
I worked in insurance defense for a little more than 2 months. Worst depression I ever had. Now I do estate planning and am so much happier.
That’s great you got out of it then, so many people just stay and suffer in a bad spot
I like insurance defense. You don't need to be an a--hole and can help the injured parties receive adequate compensation for their injuries. And you don't usually have to worry about getting paid, win or lose, although the rates are lower.
😊
The case with the parent giving up the kids for furniture, could have been my biological father. He said he wouldn’t contest custody, or try for the house (that my mum solely paid for) - if he got mine and my sister beds (he claimed they were heirloom, but they weren’t) and $40k. Mum only agreed as long as he paid for new beds for us, and she made sure we didn’t get anything expensive. Even when he takes his kids beds away, my mum has more class
HOA dude: my mom used to be a legal secretary before she realized how much she hated desk work, and also before me or my full siblings were in the picture (almost 30 years ago). Part of that office’s job was dealing with this 1 HOA that foreclosed on a couple memorable houses.
The first was a guy who’s lawn mower had broken and he was working all week long and hadn’t had time to fix it. He had communicated this with the HOA and said he would get his lawn cut as soon as possible. HOA wasn’t having it and foreclosed.
Then another house was foreclosed because their garbage disposal wasn’t working. Now how did the HOA know it wasn’t working? They’re not allowed to go into your house.
And this is why ever since I learned this I tell people you don’t have to join an HOA and they legally cannot refuse a sale if you refuse to join. Sure if there’s public resources for HOA members you won’t be able to access them, but HOA fees are ridiculous and the money you save from not joining can go to a gym or pool membership.
I love the way the text reader reads CRASH with the same intense level of inflection no matter what context the word is used, or how calmly the other words are read 😆
Computer voice.
@@oldwoman5942 yes
Time?
IAAL = I am a lawyer. Hadn't encountered that one before this
IPALDUMB
@@fireiron369 You've got me. What is that supposed to mean? 🤔
@@CNinjaa I Put A Lego Dinosaur Up My Butt
@@fireiron369 congratulations
@@CNinjaa aww thanks last person I told called the cops on me 😊
The divorce attorney I used was just awful. She didn't even try and completely ruined my case. I regret hiring her every day.
My divorce attorney told me to “Face it, he’s getting custody.” I pointed out that none of the kids were his and we had only been married for two years and he was an proven abuser and he just waved me out of his office. I was shocked. I knocked on his partner/boss’s office door, someone I’d known since I was a kid, and told him what had happened. He stood up and left the office then I heard very loud voices and then he returned with my file. He took over and I got my divorce and sole custody of the kids. Oh and a decade later the first lawyer became a judge and when I was appearing before him, as a representative/prosecutor for my employer’s legal cases, he would be borderline rude to me.
@@oldwoman5942 Law is so fucked if people like that are allowed to be on these cases and become the judge to decides what the result would say.
@@oldwoman5942 report him. That’s unethical at best. Obviously look up all of the relevant info first but that’s not okay.
@@oldwoman5942 WTF THATS CRAZY!-- what was his problem with you? What a COMPLETE ASSHOLE.
-when I was engaged to my (now) husband, his ex got all ticked and sent her attorney after ME (…like I was a home wrecker.) mind you, they divorce and custody had been finalized for at least 8-9months and I met him years after they’d separated. Anyhow her attorney was RIDICULOUS! I receive a discovery packet asking me “what business I had dating” my husband and asking me personal questions about my job at the time (granted I was being filmed for a reality show, assuming the ex thought I was making big bucks and she was entitled to it) Never completed the discovery packet of bullshit questions. Husband goes to court ( I wasn’t invited btw) her attorney opens with “your honor look at this whore!”
…..it was a photo of me. I’m significantly better looking and younger than the ex wife, so naturally I’m a “whore”. Unbelievable. BTW- husband represented himself that day and judge sided with him 😊 never returned to court again.
Can lawyers get sued for malpractice like doctors? Because if so, sue her ass into oblivion
I went in for a public transit hearing about the price difference between a student and a non-student transit ticket. The price difference is $5 and I was a broke college student.
I showed up, with the transit ticket in question (it reads Student ticket) and was asked if I had a student ID. I did and ahowed it to the judge. The judge looked over the ticket and asked the officer who gave me the ticket if it is suppose to be an age restricted ticket (between 5-18 year old). The officer said yes.
The judge dismissed the fine and charge as there was no age restriction listed on the ticket. Just that there are student and non-student tickets. Apparently it took the transportation company a year to change the prints on the tickets. They now specify age pricing tickets.
I’m koi
Bn mm
College students are students also. In addition not all college students have lots of money.
DUI people never learn. My former BIL’s step dad got caught driving drunk on 3 separate occasions, only had his license temporarily suspended because he needed it for his job, and as far as I’m aware it took the people threatening to revoke his green card and ship him back to Mexico for him to stop driving drunk. Didn’t stop the fool from inviting his buddies over to get drunk at his own daughter’s birthday parties, which is just a whole ‘nother issue in and of itself.
1:04:37 I can relate to this. I used to be an HOA attorney and it was miserable work.
Just because you did it doesn't mean you're guilty!
It doesn't mean you can be found guilty, if you're lucky and have a good lawyer. But doing it means you are guilty.
Not a Lawyer but we ran through hypothetical court cases of historical figures where two members of the class posed as the attorneys, teacher was the judge and the rest of the class was the jury. Each pair was given their person then had one day to prepare arguments based on what was known about them in history and the following day would have our 'court date'.
When it was my turn to get an assignment the hypothetical scenario was if Hitler had been taken alive and brought to trial and I was going to be his defense. I looked the teacher in the face and calmly stated: "The only thing I will do to prepare for court will be to have a shirt made that says 'I would do my part to help my country but murder is illegal' and with God is my witness I will be proud to take that F and uniform suspension because my grandfather fought against fascism and so will I". The class cheered me on, making it very obvious what their judgment was going to be.
Our person was changed and I don't even remember to who anymore because this was back in high school, but I still remember the shocked look on my teacher's face with how strongly I felt over being asked to defend Hitler and was willing to poison my jury over my beliefs.
grats on feeling like hitler was bad. so brave
Great job. Your moronic take on the point really showed them. 👍
1:44:47 WITH THE EXPRESS
It's amazing seeing people grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory
6:40 I shed a tear for him
I'm not a lawyer however when I went in for a custody hearing for my boys my ex's attorney proved my case that I needed to remain the custodial parent and needed a restraining order. He tried to run me off the road with my boys in the car then his attorney made the claim that because he was out of town the week after the incident he couldn't have possibly have been in town to do it...
Of all these stories, my favorites are the ones where opposing counsel just have the most half-witted leaps in logic and genuinely think they're making a good argument. Glad you got your boys
The reader sounds so annoyed and it's always funny
3:35 this sounds dumb until youve had a car that accelerates after you start trying to pass them!
Gotta laugh at the Police Officer who got all those tickets dismissed... hilarious. I'd have had to leave the room due to uncontrollable laughter
Right at the start of my career, I was the lawyer for a good looking woman in a divorce case, no children. We worked out an extremely, almost unbelievable, property settlement for my client. Some years later, I discovered that the reason that we got such a favorable settlement was that my client was sleeping with the husband's attorney during the course of the proceedings. I knew nothing about this at the time. I was shocked, especially at the conduct of the opposing attorney. I learned a few lessons from this, especially that I did not want to handle divorce cases, which I did not in the future. I had a similar case later, where the attorney got involved in a romantic relationship with his own client. He withdrew from the representation, which is an appropriate result, and subsequently married the client. They remained together until his death, decades later.
Cool first name
Good for the second attorney, I guess...?
Maybe?
I have no idea how to respond to that.
"Not a lie-war." Gotta love robot readers.
Restraining order case with my uncle was fun, ex girlfriend files and gets restraining order (it was on BS charges which the judge stated were bs in legalise several months later). My uncle is in his usual restaurant with friends when she shows up, he leaves to follow the order, gose to his favourite pub, she follows 30 minutes later, at this point he decides he won't leave, she screams at him to and when he refuses calls the police, two hours later she is in a cell as she had forgotten to read the order carefully, it's a two way order(they all are) since it was provable she did not regularly visit these place when he did and she followed him SHE had violated the order, two days later magistrate drops the order as my uncle shows that the order was requested for malicious reasons and community member vouch for him that the order won't be needed for him to avoid contact. The court case between them a few months later is a favourite family tale but can't be told on the internet as it has too much personal info
That 2nd story is on another level.
Glitches in these videos really throw my whole focus. Wtf.
Yeah, they do it so people can't steal the content because these videos are so cookie cutter, anyone could do it. If two videos both have glitches they can just say "well mine had it first"
As if anyone would steal this content anyway 🤣
Yeah, same… 1:44:47 “with the express- with the express- with the express- with the express-“ i was like STAHP
3:75 bro failed middle school math, never got out of middle school, ever.
That skillet story was from Boston legal
I thought that sounded familiar!
14 dollars a day for jury and to be taxed for the pay. Yeah you bet I'm going to piss in the pool.
I watched this after the Rittenhouse trial. Kinda feel like that’s a good fit for this vid.
Yupppp it was really a case of state-called witnesses bolstering not the prosecutions case but the defendant. Can't wait for the defamation suits.
wdym you feel like its a good fit for the video
It was glorious, self defense is not a crime
@@cjl7045 the prosecution has no case, and it only got worse from there.
@@DrEpicness144 oh, thanks for clarifyign
Ads on the first half go B R R R R R R
Idk if this is in the video cause I'm not watching 3 hours of reddit videos, but I heard this one story about someone who had their wallet stolen. They said there was "x, y things in there" and the person accused said "actually there wasn't y in there, there was z" I cant remember exactly how it went but it lasted about 30 seconds.
If you ever get accused of flashing someone or being inappropriate and it’s one word against the other…..
It’s not illegal to be naked in your own home. And it’s not illegal to have your curtains or blind open.
It’s easier if you were on the first floor (above the one you walk in to) where the bedrooms are. You can be naked at your window watching birds outside. It’s not illegal. If claiming indecency- your looking up at the birds- they’re looking at you.
^this is if your on a residential road in a house or something. or apartment.
If your watching the birds naked (NOT ILLEGAL) and they’re looking at you watching birds. Don’t make eye contact with them- if you do- you saw a bird/ butterfly/ something on the window. Don’t acknowledge the people or it’ll be harder to fight the case
This thread has convinced me that being a judge is absolutely tiring
Around here you can’t get a dui while riding a horse since a horse and go places without the assistance of anyone.
the whole jury thing. atleast for the usa. why blame the freaking person when you straight up ask them a question and all that. LIke hello your at fault not the person. Take the extra day of work and just interview each person alone and not out in the open to taint everyone else.
Wait, in the case at 58:55 the boyfriend walked free when the girlfriend walked into court with all the injuries he was alleged of they make it sound obvious as to why it was thrown out and she was charged with contempt of court. What exactly is the reason? It sounds far more reasonable to continue the case and prove if the boyfriend caused those injuries, not throw it out and charge her with anything. 🤔
1:58:11 dude that son mustve felt so bad after knowing what happened
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
that one with the chickens just made me sad...
2:32:50
A hand in his carry on...
Was his name... Yoshikage Kira, by chance?
Air Force BMT one, I've seen just enough trainee things as a trainee that it's believable
The one where the dude jacked then had to make the witness describe his size and confirm it with the Jury, I can’t tell if that was a pure alpha move or an intentional mockery of the justice system 😂
With the express
3 hours of lolz
Wouldnt there have had to have actually been pot and ''m'' found in the defendant's vehicle in addition to the k9 unit "saying" that such substances were present? And if so, just the fact that a police officer says that thats where it came from is normally sufficient evidence to convict.
What does physical shaming mean in this context? Is it a U.K. thing, or a phrase that is only used in some states?
Sxual assault, I think it's a censorship thing
How the hell do you impound a Horse* how could no one tell me about the spelling mistake
You rein it in
@@MinatheRaichu You Sir/Ma’am are underrated. I just want you to know you made me literally laugh out loud after a long day of work.
@@noahbell7297 Thank you, thank you. Now rest easy
At 1:44:50 its repeating
With drunk driving they can use your blood sample to trace back of how drunk you were the say 12 hours ago
Wait, that one lawyer is having interns put together letters implying (or stating), lawsuits?
A person's life shouldn't be homework! At the absolute minimum, it ruins your day. For those prone to anxiety, sky's the limit to how bad it could get.
I hope I misunderstood.
you do miss understan the intern put to gether the document but the lawyer must review the document before it sent that it's correct, as it sent out in their name
1:49:03 naw he ate them up😂
The 2 that raised their hsnds...hands.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
There were several parts in here where they talked about context was not set correctly or contexts was missing altogether.
It took me awhile because I'm extremely honest and people would twist things and nitpick certain words without the context to make me look bad. And then one of them was an individual that work say did you say it did you say it immediately after repeating something I said but did not say the entire statement which would have changed everything. So it wasn't until I heard a preacher make a comment that it is a lie to take things out of context and pick only portions of the statement which make the other argument valid. So therefore if the context is missing it is all right to say no that is a lie because it is, because without the context you didn't make that statement. And I ran in the same issue where an individual didn't want to hear the context.
So rather than using my honesty against me while they'll sit there and lie I would just tell the truth, and It's upsetting a judge and some of these examples acted that way without context since you're supposed to State the whole truth, not a snippet of it. And for judge to act that way really hasn't believed they should not be on a bench.
Lmao... Pretty sure literally EVERYONE would not expect the judicial system to do basically anything truthfully or by the book... Lawyers are trained professional liar's.
🖤🖤
Will / money stuff; always give everyone a specific amount EG £1 for daughter 1, son, daughter 2, and stepson ... or whatever.. Then they can't contest that they werent given anything, can't fight the will and can't say its unfair. if they all get the equal small amount.
atleast this is my understanding of it...
also I'd like a few quid from my nan/grandad and so on so i can buy something in remembrance of them, a garden angel, or a train, plane so on whatever is in reference to that specific person, otherwise I'm fine without the money.
Hey Brits, is a Magistrate the judge of a British country? What does a Magistrate do?
Re the comment on the parmentry court case, not the US case isn't different. The direct comparison is the Marinda case, where a confestion gets though as non voltariary if you put the defended in a position where they don't think they have an option to remain silent. the old oath didn't give them a option to raimin silent (or the equvelnt of the line "I plead the 5th") hence wasn't a voltary confesstion
Ollie I hope you and the the rest of the family have a fantastic holiday love you all lots auntie Debbie
Does this count as an r/oldpeoplefacebook?
16:25 🤣🤣🤣 🎤🐕
1:44:45 lol
A compilations not repeating that same stories over and over.
What does TLDR mean ?
Why do old people always fall for scams?
with the express with the express with the express with the express with the express with the express
Someone confused inches with centimeters
17:00
Bahahahahaha! Oh my god
Law do be stupid sometimes
25th
Soooo people here in the comments and on reddit just love ignoring the question. You aren't a lawyer, don't fucking answer.
Why do people hate prosecutors so much...
Same reason we hate stupid questions.
This vid shows how many bad , authoritarian ego fueled judges there are. When prople express their opinion in court, which they have every right to do (1st ammenment) they get thrown into jail for contempt of court aka contempt of judges ego. Disgusting
15 inches. Ok.
This AI voice, does make a lot of grammatical errors because of context. Especially with lives and résumé’.
What the hell is “physical shaming”? Like making fun of fat or skinny or messed up people? I’m confused.
Euphemism for sexual assault.
I hear lawyer and think liar liar lol
10334😊
69th B)
Earnest Borgnine married Shelly Winters. She filed for divorce after the thirty day honeymoon.....
The one who confessed to something at 1 15 08 or so.. honest man orr woman . maybe dumb too.. but honest
Lawyers are scum. "It's not your fault" even though you knew this drunk driver has a history of being trash and so you defend him. Yea it is your fault for getting him off