New Perspectives: Challenging philosophical trends | Penrose, Žižek, Singer, Noble, and many more!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 тра 2024
  • Do our theories of physics and the universe work? How do we relate to the world around us? What is our basis of morality? From physics to philosophy, watch the world’s leading thinkers debate today’s biggest ideas, including Roger Penrose, Slavoj Žižek, Peter Singer, Thangam Debbonaire, Priya Natarajan, Lisa Randall, Tim Maudlin, Marika Taylor, Denis Noble, Joscha Bach, Tommy Curry, Paul Bloom and Rowan Williams.
    Join the debate live at the upcoming HowTheLightGetsIn festival in Hay-On-Wye in May 2024! For more information, visit: howthelightgetsin.org/festiva...
    00:00 Introduction
    01:12 Do our theories of physics work? | Roger Penrose, Priya Natarajan, Lisa Randall, Tim Maudlin, Marika Taylor
    13:22 How do we relate to what’s out there? | Denis Noble, Joscha Bach
    17:35 What is in our nature? | Paul Bloom, Rowan Williams, Slavoj Žižek
    27:25 What’s right and what’s wrong? | Peter Singer, Tommy Curry, Thangam Debbonaire
    #physics #philosophy #debate
    Debates and talks featured:
    The trouble with string theory (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/the-trouble-with...
    Gravity and the universe (London, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/gravity-and-the-...
    The centre of the universe (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/the-centre-of-th...
    Beyond experiment (London, 2022)
    iai.tv/video/beyond-experiment
    Beauty and the meaning of life (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/beauty-and-the-m...
    Rhetoric and reality (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/rhetoric-and-rea...
    The rational animal (2020)
    iai.tv/video/the-rational-animal
    In conversation; Rowan Williams and Iain McGilchrist (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/on-the-nature-of...
    Surplus happiness (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/surplus-happiness
    A rule to live by (London, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/a-rule-to-live-by
    The good and the evil (Hay 2022)
    iai.tv/video/the-good-and-the...
    Democracy in the dock (Hay, 2023)
    iai.tv/video/democracy-in-the...
    The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! iai.tv/subscribe?Y...
    For debates and talks: iai.tv
    For articles: iai.tv/articles
    For courses: iai.tv/iai-academy/courses

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @TheInstituteOfArtAndIdeas
    @TheInstituteOfArtAndIdeas  9 днів тому +2

    What questions would you ask to challenge the status quo? Let us know in the comments below! Join the debate live at the next festival: howthelightgetsin.org/festivals/hay?UA-cam&

    • @AlexHillsCandles4Assange
      @AlexHillsCandles4Assange 7 днів тому

      Why can't I comment without censorshup?

    • @AlexHillsCandles4Assange
      @AlexHillsCandles4Assange 7 днів тому

      I asked if someone would try the challenge of watching playlist on w1t$1t get$1t channel for my proposed challenging question

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited 9 днів тому +3

    Great collage of perspectives, thank you to all. Peace ✌️ 😎.

  • @SpokoSpoko
    @SpokoSpoko 9 днів тому +6

    It looks like compilation of talks we saw many times already

    • @ruinsphisic
      @ruinsphisic 9 днів тому

      y

    • @dunk1089
      @dunk1089 8 днів тому

      it is. this is a common tactic used by this channel to have you wanting more access to talks and then being met with a paywall.

  • @bretnetherton9273
    @bretnetherton9273 5 днів тому

    Awareness is known by awareness alone.

  • @wulphstein
    @wulphstein 9 днів тому

    I would have thought that a constant speed of light would have/should have encouraged physicists to ask how that trick (the invariance of c) is achieved ontologically, how nature does that.

  • @danielberkowitz3524
    @danielberkowitz3524 8 днів тому +1

    You need to get Penrose and Zizek together.

  • @homewall744
    @homewall744 9 днів тому +9

    Funny how they use "theory" to mean "hypothesis" when they are the same people who keep telling us we're stupid for not understanding how these differ in science.

    • @0l_pops531
      @0l_pops531 9 днів тому +1

      The "String Theory" Hypothesis?

    • @CONNELL19511216
      @CONNELL19511216 9 днів тому +3

      You're nit picking to the nth degree

    • @fujifooj875
      @fujifooj875 7 днів тому

      If i allow for a bit of wiggle room in language, mixing up theory vs hypothesis is not a big problem.

  • @davidbond5448
    @davidbond5448 9 днів тому +1

    Goosestepper at 19:30

    • @user-iu4wh1zs6t
      @user-iu4wh1zs6t 8 днів тому

      Yeah. I wonder why maga crowds spread COVID. Was it their politically driven resistance to masks and vaccines?
      BLM crowds took vaccines and wore masks... But, he wanted to make his own uninformed point.

    • @waltershumer4211
      @waltershumer4211 День тому

      What?

  • @homewall744
    @homewall744 9 днів тому +1

    Why does each new dimension from point (0D), to line (1D), to plane (2D), to cube (3D), to 3D throughout time (4D), then has a bunch of new dimensions that are all tiny and folded in as if anything is smaller than 0D to 1D.

    • @helicalactual
      @helicalactual 8 днів тому

      Time is not a dimension. It is merely a convention for substructures of the universe to coordinate intent.
      It is not itself an orthogonal direction, therefore it is not a degree of freedom.
      This is only a matrix convention.

  • @contemplatico
    @contemplatico 7 днів тому

    How many times are you gonna keep re-hashing these old 'clips' ... Talk about a re-run of a re-run of a re-run 😞

  • @konichiwaburajirujin
    @konichiwaburajirujin 6 днів тому

    Everything is theorical

  • @PuppetMasterdaath144
    @PuppetMasterdaath144 9 днів тому +1

    it's hilarious to me how difficult to articulate probabilistic correlation reasoning is not that much worse a method to deductive reasoning in terms of theoretical analysis vs experimental empirical scrutiny trough the scientific method, in terms of a quite a few things, is it because they are afraid to be laughed at it seems very much so lol

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited 9 днів тому +1

    Well, was somewhat scripted as is the norm. Maybe I was expecting to much, but perspectives are just that,and when everyone is, it appears to be terrified to try and put forth arguments for a better understanding. By understanding, I mean look up and think that's just not correct. Is it the questions that are being asked that need to change. Why are we asking these questions, and why not those. In my opinion, those seem to be more exciting. Represent urging for more information knowledge wanting to know. So why do galacty exist? What are their purpose in the overall scheme of our observations. So my opinion is this. Blacksphere ⚫️ are born to form galacty, to gather matter to form closed systems. To remove all the material from the infinite ♾️ vacuum space, to cleanse it. And we are part of this system. I believe we're looking at the system and misunderstanding the underlying purpose. We want it to be special not because it serves a purpose but because our brains try to make sense of what we observe. But what the brains aren't doing is finding the purpose. We're too busy being in awe of the spectacle instead of realizing what it's doing and why? We need to change our thinking on the matter, we need to figure out how to use what's available for our survival in the vastness that is the infinite ♾️ vacuum space. Peace ✌️ 😎.

  • @PuppetMasterdaath144
    @PuppetMasterdaath144 9 днів тому

    Roger Penrose is quite odd to position against consciousness as a philosophical ponderance of importance LMFAO.