“Very Serious Threat to Democracy” - 7% of Voters Swayed by Google Searches
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 кві 2024
- Founder of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell sheds light on the significant influence exerted by just 7% of adults who base their voting decisions solely on Google searches, labeling it as a serious threat to democracy.
------
Patrick Bet-David
Valuetainment promotional links (with UTM codes)
Connect one-on-one with the right expert to get the answers you need with Minnect!
Visit Valuetainment University for the best courses online for entrepreneurs:
Get best-in-class business advice with Bet-David Consulting:
Visit VT.com for the latest news and insights from the world of politics, business and entertainment:
Patrick Bet-David is the founder and CEO of Valuetainment Media. He is the author of the #1 Wall Street Journal Bestseller Your Next Five Moves
So we should be able to sue Google for all the extra inflation we are paying...
What is the common thread among the fascist companies of Big Tech (Google, Yahoo, Facebook, etc.)? They are owned by a single group of people with a shared background. How does something like that happen? And no, it's not a coincidence.
If people had the ability to think for themselves , this would never be an issue.
Call me crazy but illuminati
@@promx96 Jews...
@@promx96 Nope. But the group that I'm referring to has rituals, too. You can show proof that they own everything, and they will attack you for exposing the truth. They don't just own Big Tech. They own and control all of media. They are the dominant force in government, academia, the stock market, you name it. None of that happens by coincidence. None of it.
Again, America is not a democracy. It's a republic. Idk how many times we have to go over this
A democratically elected republic.
Wikipedia is a PUBLISHER! Every story on the site states "from Wikipedia", enough said.
If you need a search engine to research presidential candidates you are clueless and should never vote.
Do you go to the library to research candidates? They listed in the card catalog system? Perhaps you only ready your local newspaper? Ahh but then you are subject to your local editor’s political perspective. No no you read the big national newspapers like the NYT and Washington Post because they are not biased at all. Not that’s not it, you must get your info from CNN, Fox News or MSNBC because they don’t have an agenda at all. Or maybe, you use a search engine to access all of that data, plus more from independent journalists on sub stack or Reddit along with independent pod casts, from all over the country, for some real journalism and then make an informed decision. Yep you are right, the search engines are useless when researching political candidates. I will just stick to the totally unbiased newspapers and news stations.
How is that any different from the news or even newspapers?
Tech companies should not be political. When individuals search something on Google, they do not expect bias towards a specific political party. Nowadays, just by knowing the name of a news company or newspaper, you can easily identify the party they support and are likely to favor them.
@@f.j.c4444Everything you just said is supposed to also apply to journalism. Just because you and I know who they’re biased towards doesn’t mean the ignorant do and that’s a huge swath of voters.
Definitions of what is "publishing" and editorial output? Maybe weighted and biased algorithms count as editorial? I would argue it does.
The future looks bright 🙏🏽💪
Thanks to Valuetainment 🇺🇸
Good.show today..guys
The media n Google. Cant fool.me..i.can think 4myself😂
This is why I haven’t used anything made by Google for years
You are using something made by Google right now dude.
@@sincityguns3460 Ah, right. Crap, well I’m out of here. Later.
@@sincityguns3460 In all seriousness, UA-cam is the perfect example of how Google censors on a regular basis. I’ve lost count of the number of times that a comment I’ve left has been hidden for no obvious reason. They like to say it’s not happening but they didn’t cover their tracks very well. The idiots left a bug where the comment thread count will tell you the actual number of replies but when you look at it the number of comments you see doesn’t match.
@@deadli-us Lol
@@sincityguns3460 It's not made by Google. As happens a lot of times, Google ( Alphabet ) just bought it to keep on going with their monopoly.
negative seven percent?
or seven?
serious syntax question
This guy was good in "big daddy" can't believe he took sandlers girl
Try talking bad things about the Hungarian philanthropist in UA-cam comments.
Can I hear you defend Trump around the hush-money trial, for which his former lawyer spent time in jail? Tell us all that you think Trump committed no campaign violations, PBD. :) ‘Cause, after all, for Christians like you it doesn’t matter what Trump does in his private life. He should still be our president.
We are a republic not a democracy
I still maintain that the Google is funded by the sea eye aye
Doubt that. You can criticize the CIA on UA-cam, but you will get suspended for criticizing China or India.