I used Fedora 39 and 40 with success. Upon upgrading to Fedora 41, Gnome 47 produced an annoying key chain syndrome. Suddenly, I was in password purgatory. I moved to CachyOS since it was serving me well on another notebook PC. Hyprland and Gnome 47 are going fine using this Arch based distro.
They are both good operating systems, but what about the btrfs filesystem? Is he mature now? Is it safe on SSDs or does it produce more write operations resulting in performance drop and issues with SSDs in case of prolonged use? Thank you very much
Btrfs is an advanced file system that offers superior features compared to Ext4, such as snapshots and rollback, built-in compression, support for multi-disk volumes, and dynamic resizing. However, it doesn't achieve the same level of stability and reliability as Ext4. Features like RAID 5/6 can present issues, and Btrfs is susceptible to fragmentation and slowness under heavy disk access loads. It's a bit like comparing a Mercedes, which can last a million kilometers, with a Gran Turismo racing car: both have their strengths, but they serve different purposes. Btrfs is suitable for those who seek advanced features and flexibility, while Ext4 is more suitable for those aiming for stability and security.
I used Fedora 39 and 40 with success. Upon upgrading to Fedora 41, Gnome 47 produced an annoying key chain syndrome. Suddenly, I was in password purgatory.
I moved to CachyOS since it was serving me well on another notebook PC. Hyprland and Gnome 47 are going fine using this Arch based distro.
Hyperland works better on Arch, that’s true.
It is a promo video for Fedora and why you shouldn't try Ubuntu?
I installed Ubuntu since when was released the first time ;) it's my opinion no a promo
They are both good operating systems, but what about the btrfs filesystem? Is he mature now? Is it safe on SSDs or does it produce more write operations resulting in performance drop and issues with SSDs in case of prolonged use? Thank you very much
Btrfs is an advanced file system that offers superior features compared to Ext4, such as snapshots and rollback, built-in compression, support for multi-disk volumes, and dynamic resizing. However, it doesn't achieve the same level of stability and reliability as Ext4. Features like RAID 5/6 can present issues, and Btrfs is susceptible to fragmentation and slowness under heavy disk access loads.
It's a bit like comparing a Mercedes, which can last a million kilometers, with a Gran Turismo racing car: both have their strengths, but they serve different purposes. Btrfs is suitable for those who seek advanced features and flexibility, while Ext4 is more suitable for those aiming for stability and security.