I'm still surprised nobody sinned the fact that Belle remembers the windmill area, and says it's from her childhood, and yet she's a baby in the scene when they leave.
Right before she sings, she says "It's so much smaller than I imagined" so all she knew about it was based on what Maurice had told her because she was too young to remember physically being there herself. It was still a part of her childhood though.
Brenna Montgomery hellooo don't you remember the music box Maurice was working on? It was literally a mini version of the windmill...and her father obviously was open to describe the home at one point in her life he just left out the part about how her mom died
I appreciate the responses...I admittedly did not put as much thought into that part of the movie. The movie itself added a lot more details that took a lot of thought, and I was confused by the way they worded it. I mean, it was a very haphazard explanation of how she knew, only through one song lyric and Maurice telling her stories about it that we never saw or explained in-movie.
I honestly really enjoyed this movie, and saw it in theaters twice. But the original is my favorite Disney movie of all time, so really this was kinda a fan fiction for me. It was visually beautiful. At the same time, I had a good laugh at this Cinema Sins and agreed with a lot of the sins. Cheers!
@Amazon Rose I think the live-action French version was more fantastical IMHO. Lea Seydoux did great. hellogiggles.com/reviews-coverage/casts-american-vs-french-beauty-and-the-beast/
Gail Wiley agreed completely i just finished a junior theatre musical where a TWELVE year old played belle and her acting singing and costumes was way better
Why the servants weren't animals!? The curse, was to show perspective. The servants saw the Prince as a "beast". The Prince saw the servants as "objects".
I remember leaning over to my mother during the movie and jokingly saying: "Belle's mom probably died of plague, or something." Then when plague was revealed, both my mom and I cackled for a few short seconds.
Another sin: We see in the beginning of the movie the librarian is Belle's only real friend in town. In the scene where Gaston locks up Maurice and Belle and rallies the town to kill the beast, the librarian is shown to not agree. But the question is, what happens to him? We don't see him at all at the castle, implying that he stayed in town. But if he stayed in town, why was he not at least attempting to help Belle escape the asylum wagon? Question's bothered me for months.
Je ne said quoi = that something special, I learned that during a movie, an American girl movie. That’s concerning that a French man doesn’t know that.
The thing is. Emma Watson actually can sing, not greatly, but decently. They could've spent the autotune budget on singing lessons. Look at Mamma Mia, none of those actors were really good singers, but they spent their money and time where they should've.
Toon Holman That is why to this day I was so disappointed to know Emma Watson was cast as Belle. She isn't that kind of actress suited for films like this.
Scattered Thoughts my issue with La La Land. It’s about starving, yet talented artist that haven’t met their chance, and yet they hired actors that literally can’t perform the art that they’re supposed to be portraying. Love Emma Stone, but so many actresses can actually sing and act and are waiting for their breakout moment, but the movie picked already known names.
In the real story beast was a child when the enchantress came to the castle so it makes sense that he was scared and disgusted by a woman that randomly came into his kingdom.
@@Skyebright1 I've been seeing alot of people getting upset about this funny detail being pointed out. like do people actually hold this against the movie?
Why was the part where Beast threw a goddamn snowball the size of a soccer ball at Belle's face not included?! That shit had me dying in the theater when I first saw it. Happened during the song Something There and Belle was completely unharmed lol
That growl at the end when she asks about him growing a beard is SO cringy.... like it could have been sexy in a totally different context... but given the age gap and the complete lack of chemistry they have... *cringe*
I'm guessing it depends on how real the CGI looks?? I don't know, I feel like at least Jungle Book should be considered animated. Literally everything is CGI except for the boy :/
Doesn't this film just make you...long for the days when actors were hired for their ability to actually act, sing and dance. You know like ppl with talent should be hired.
But she played sweet bookish Hermione in Harry Potter, technology can supplement for the actual talent required to perform in a musical (#sarcasam). Emma Watson's acting is passable (as Hermione). But I too miss kinda looking for good singers and not tweaking so-so ones.
Adrian Ramirez This only happens when Jeremy truly hates a movie and this one deserved it. They should have done a bonus round for all the scenes copied line for line from the animated version.
Yeah he literally complained about the same sin twice, the whole witch wiping everyone's memory of the prince and then saying why does no one remember the prince.
Actually I agree with Alexej; based solely on the time period the film takes place in there shouldn't be any black people at all. It's something that bugs me when films just put black people in roles where, to be historically accurate, they shouldn't be. Same thing for Frozen; people keep bitching about them all being white, because it's set in Norway in what, the early 1900s? No black people there then, either. Honestly.
For sin #63 the enchantress changed them into what they saw of each other. The staff saw him as a beast/monster so that's what she turned him into. As for the staff, the beast merely saw them as things. For example, cogsworth was turned into a clock. In the beginning of the movie you can se him holding a pocket watch saying, "master its *time.* " so I hope that answer people's questions 😁
+5 sins for the terrible use of Autotune (since it's used multiple times. And is horrible and distracting). Also, +1 for ruining Belle's iconic yellow dress! I know Emma was being a modern feminist or whatever and refused to wear an actual corset, but they could have at least made a dress that looked like it had a corseted bodice or, for that matter, ANY styling whatsoever consistent with the time period! That was an entirely modern-day dress in a movie set in the 1700's. And even if you go with the original Disney version's setting of the 1800's, it's still a dress 200+ years out of place.
feminists these days are fucking stupid. Like honestly, its nothing like before. They just get mad over stupid shit instead of talking about real issues. cOrSeTs
Not to mention that, while the plague still sprouted out occasionally and killed people in the 1700s, it was 200 years past it's peak, and there weren't plague doctors, but the movie wanted to make sure everyone knew it was plague by throwing in a plague doctor mask which was 200 years too vintage for this movie.
The shot of them dancing in the original animated film as the camera pans all around them in the ballroom was literally the only reason I wanted to even see this film, and it wasn’t there. Unlike a book where you just copy the script almost apart from some adjustments you literally had the script and shots from a animated classic, and you copied so many things from the original but not the one famous scene this movie is known for 😂
Kae I know! I feel terrible for people who work hard on their voices, then AutoTune comes along and ruins everything. But it sounds so artificial. It's simply hideous.
Kae it fucking hurts my ears and im so frustrated because who ever the fuck plays beat has a un- auto tuned version of evermore on the album and its 100 times better than the movie.
The Autotune in this movie is straight out offensive. You take a musical. And cast TWO people for the LEADING roles who can not sing and have to be autotuned to oblivion. And one of thems appearance doesn't even matter because he's freaking CGI 99% of the movie.. Seriously? Seriously? I am just baffled at this.
Belle seeming to be out of focus and smiling for no apparent reason during the Be Our Guest scene is because in reality Emma Watson was filmed separately from other actors just sitting in a chair in a room in which she was the only cast member present. In reality, she was smiling and giggling at crew members telling her jokes during takes.
*The aesthetics of this movie were **_beautiful_**.* But the producers/directors spent to much time on background characters then Belle and the Beast, making their love gradually grow. They missed the entire point of the movie, the story. And that's why I really hate it. Again beautiful, but no point.
Even if they did it couldn't convince me, because Dan Stevens gave a scarily accurate performance in The Guest, whereas Emma Watson delivered one in Regression, so I couldn't shake the thought of two people dancing, who played convincing and lethal sociopaths. Stevens is such a badass, during his performance in Legion, he hasn't simply opted for a convincing American accent, but also changed his voice, so when his actual voice came up near the end, he made me totally forget that he's a Brit with a much deeper voice.
That's what comes after the line? Cause I heard nothing, it's just silence for me... could it be a copyright infringement issue - only in specific countries?
When the Beast is reading a book about "King Arthur and his knights",it`s a reference to Dan Stevens playing Lancelot in Night at the Museum 3 as a sort-of villain.
No. You're wrong. That will not ever happen, because the Emoji Movie is going to be the greatest and single most important film of all time. It _oozes_ with originality, is visually stunning, and is bound to have the most amazing script in all of entertainment history. Just you wait and see.
Yeah, it must suck. It has the word "emoji" in it. And we're supposed to hate millenial phrases more and more as millenials get younger and younger. Right.. logic.
Honestly wouldn’t be surprised if this was a Harry Potter spin-off disguised as a Beauty and the Beast remake, with the adventure being about Hermoine, and cheating on Ron for a Beast.
Cinema Sins you forgot that Gaston's telescope can look that far in the village and perfectly pinpoint Belle from about 10 miles away Edit: Holy Cow my sarcastic a$$ comment got ALOT of likes!
0:47 "Who has the door right behind the throne in the throne room?" That would be a good question if it was, in fact, a throne room. It's not. It's very clearly a ball room. The throne is because he's a) the host, and b) a prince.
Evermore is original to the movie. On Broadway Beast's song is If I Can't Love Her. He sings it closing Act I and reprises it after he lets Belle go (which also gives her a quick change moment).
Blue A and yet it still made 1 billion dollars in box office. But I gotta admit, the song that the beast sang made me feel sorry for him and kind of hit me in the feels.
Two more sins: 1) This is set in France, right? So why is the book in the scene where Belle teaches the girl to read in ENGLISH? 2) Did anyone noticed that when the horse runs from the castle to Belle's village it is completely dirty? But funny enough in the next scene when they head to the castle it is perfectly clean. Seems like Belle was like "Omg! My dad's in danger but I better clean this horse, bc maybe the guy who has captured him is my future husband😍"
You know how in guardians of the galaxy all the aliens speak perfect English? Well same reason here, just cause they speak English and sound English doesn't mean they are English, its the movie translating for the appropriate audience
caseymac MacL that was a big thing with their relationship. While they were cursed they would always talk about how they can't be together because it was DANGEROUS!
16:08 Everyone's following Gaston, who remembers where Maurice said where the castle was, therefore, the villagers can find the castle. The real sin is the fact that they're actually able to go there this time when Maurice just looked like an idiot when he tried to show Gaston
Also, how the heck is this wolf pack aggressive if they looked healthy. Sure wolves can attack and kill people, but they only do so if they're too old or sick to hunt natural prey like deer and such, so there's no way they would be hunting Belle or her father in the first place.
Well, it could also be because there was a time (and in the movie they are in that time) when humans were prey for wolfs, and wolfs usually also eat regularly.
Common mistake. These are fairy tale wolves. Fairy tale wolves are always mean and blood -thirsty . Always. Except the ones in the jungle book, for unknown reason. Also, that's exactly where the prejudices against wolves came from. People couldn't differ fairy tale wolves from real normal ones, though it's obviously two different species. Fairy tale ones also are much bigger and always hungry and have darker fur for example.
Good job CinemaSins, now every time I see a movie, I sin it as I watch it. **ding** Oh, and every time in a TV show or movie I hear that Wilhelm Scream, well... **OBLIGATORY WILHELM SCREAM** I think, as I make a mental youtube video and imagine pissing off millions of fanboys and fangirls alike **ding** You're welcome, I actually enjoyed typing this **ding**
I actually liked that they put that line in. If I recall correctly, in the original animated version, one of the creators was debating whether or not to put that line in because they actually liked the way the Beast looked before he was turned back into a human, but I think they decided not to. I'm glad they used it here as a reference to that, although again, that's if I'm recalling correctly.
when i saw this for the first time i haven't seen the oringinal ethier and once i have i actually liked this one better just cause i saw it first but I also like The Beast and Belle's relationship better in this one.I can ignore the auto tune.
When we watched this in the theatre, the scene where Belle runs out of the town singing and then is a few miles away, my husband leaned in and said "man, she's fast!". I immediately thought of this channel and started laughing hysterically!
The devil came to steal kill and destroy. Jesus came to give you life and that more abundantly. Long ago, a lamb 🐑 without spot and blemish would be sacrificed on an altar daily to remove sins🐑. God is Holy and to commune with God, you must be holy🙇. God made mankind to have FELLOWSHIP. He loved us💕. The devil tempted Adam and Eve to sin, and when I thought about it, I would have sinned as well because it's human nature😳. The devil is still tempting people into sin today! A curse was placed on mankind because of sin. God knew this would happen so before the foundations of the world He chose to come as man and redeem man🙆. He created hell for Satan and his demons. God didn't create man mindless but He gives each of a choice to choose good or evil, life or death. That choice is in your hands today, even as it was with Adam and Eve. Jesus is the Lamb without spot and blemish, God the Father's only begotton Son, who died to take away our sins. He gives us a chance to strive to be perfect, through love with the help of His Spirit. We become SPIRITUALLY ALIVE when we believe in God's Son, as opposed to being spiritually dead after the fall of Adam. God is pleased with faith. If you believe, repent and be baptized and you will receive 🎁the gift of His Holy Spirit. God's Spirit is full of Love and Mercy. He's gentle and compassionate. He is God! He is also dangerous to the devil. He will comfort you, help you, teach you and guide you. He will give you power to do work in His Name to advance His Kingdom, seeking and saving the lost. Choose Jesus. Taste and see that God is good💖.
+Real-life lies Well, at least it gave me a chance to catch up on sleep in one of those nice cinema chairs... Oh, and San... you are sinning at the moment - excessive use of emojis is a mortal sin, dude.
Yeah, "this movie exists" actually surprised me. Just because it's something you see in the comments section of pretty much every video they do, but I can't recall CinemaSins themselves ever saying it before. Maybe they have and I just don't remember it. Just thought it was funny hearing them say it for once.
The biggest sin of this movie was to want to "fix" the problem of the original movie : by doing it, or it makes no sense, or it leaves us with more questions than before
I lost it at the "ass eating an apple" sin. lmao! But yeah, after reading the comments, I listened closely and...you can tell Emma Watson's singing is auto-tuned. Usually, I can't -- that's how obvious it was.
FireHeart321 it was the first thing I noticed when they aired the trailers. I went "no no no no no no no no" I can't believe there are people to finance such productions, or to cast the wrong actors.... She can't sing doggamitt !!
Well she wasn’t only casted for her singing- And also think about it, this movie wouldn’t be watched if they didn’t cast ‘Hermione Granger’ I don’t think it would be so famous- Idk
Wasn't the prince originally like...11 or something when he rejected the disguised fairy? Not a twisted or cruel man, but a child who answered the door late at night and turned away a scary looking stranger (yes, I'm aware of what hospitality traditions were like, but still, he was a kid). I guess they changed that to make the setup seem a little less "disproportionate retribution".
I read somewhere that he doesn't physically age in this movie as a beast, so he's the same age getting turned into one as he is returning back to human form
The thing that makes Emma's auto tune a bigger offense is that Paige O'Hara, the original voice actor for Belle, was her voice coach! And they still felt it was necessary to auto tune her after she had lessons from the most qualified professional they had. It's not like Meryl Streep in the first Mama Mia where they cast her regardless of the fact that she couldn't sing and let her sing terribly anyway. (Along with most of the rest of that cast in general.) And Streep only got voice lessons AFTER that role to be in other musicals. This is someone who tried to learn first, and they scrapped all that learning and made it meaningless.
Do you mean Descendants as in Disney Descendants. Because all of the cast could actually sing apart from a few of the boys. They weren't as autotuned as this.
How to fix the Disney plot hols. stick to the original the story : a loving prince who breaks his promise to his wife about hunting a magical dear that turns out to be his wife and the daughter of the forest god who curses him to be a relentless predator as a punishment. the roses are a symbol of his love for her and are magically part of her so Morris plucking one is more significant to him. the time he has been cursed is never given so we can assume he has been like that for probably hundreds of year which deals with the outside world not knowing about him plus the impossible to find castle. Bells desire for a flower is brought about because of her love of plants and the fact that their recent impoverished state means she can not grow any roses and she would like her father to bring her one. oh and Gaston is a gambling greedy airhead who just wants money. so moral of the story: DON'T BREAK YOUR FUCKING PROMISES! and don't be a greedy materialistic a-hole.
That's not the actual origin story. Probably from the Grim Brothers. The origin story was based on a real life couple. The man had a rare disease where he had hair everywhere, including his face( like he was considered an actual Beast). He had an arranged marriage with a girl and their story was spread everywhere and led to this tale. (However I am not entirely sure if this is the real origin cause the one you're talking about doesn't really make any sense. Not saying you're wrong..srry)
My point was if she hadn't come from any magical castle then how else would she have gotten the dress? She's a farmer who probably doesn't earn anything without her father.
The narration in the animated film was superb. A great voice, well read, good tempo (wasn't rushed). This version was as if a teacher was reading a 4th grade student's essay on Architectural brick work. zzzzzzzzzzzz
Finally got around to watching this movie and there are a few things you left out. 1. Why the hell does Belle always have the hem of her dress tucked in the waistband so it shows off her fugly bloomers? 2. The Beast apparently hates all bannisters, railings, and anything else that might keep you from falling off of stairs, balconies, and assorted walkways. 2. The fact that the dungeon thing has no back wall. Yeah, there's a drop off, but a sufficiently determined prisoner could probably escape. 3. If this is set in the 1700s, Belle' s lack of sleeves/gloves in her fancy dress is a no no. Showing of ladies elbows is indecent. 4. Maurice abandons his sick wife completely and utterly. Seriously, did he even go back to bury her or make sure she died? 5. Belle is a baby when Maurice moves her from Paris, which means she probably grew up in that town. So she needs to stop bitching about things sucking since they moved there. She doesn't remember Paris anyhow. 6. If the castle curse affects only those who live in the castle, why are Mr Potts and Mrs Cogsworth not objects? Do they not live with their families? 7. Movie ignores perfectly good songs from the stage version for much shittier ones that make the same points. 8. The Enchantress lady is the beggar woman from town, right? Gaston insults her a couple times. Why is he not cursed?
Barbara Wilcox to refer to you #3: If this set in the 1700’s then they royally screwed up their time line by adding that her mother died of plague. Seeing as the plague happen in Europe in the 1300 - 1400’s, with it peaking between 1346-1353. So if you look at it the movie is saying that Belle and her father are over 300 years old.
#1 They explain in one of the behind the scenes things on the DVD that her dress is like that because she loves to horseride, and having her dress like that made it easier for her to get on the horse (but I completely agree about the bloomers being fugly)
MusicTS23 the edges of the cell didn't appear rough like the wall had accidentally fallen away, nor were there any scars along the edges of the walkways high up that might indicate bannisters or railings may have crumbled or entire sections fell away. It looked deliberate.
Ruby Qnn you probably have the best comment on here and you're right about the Harry Potter references, I especially love the first reference where the baker quickly forgets something and he can't remember what he forgotten
Millions might be pushing it. I bet you NO kids cried while watching it and this movie (like all disney remakes) is aimed at small children bc Disney assumes kids are stupid and they will swallow all the Disney Remake sh*t they shovel down their throats.
I thought that added some depth to the story, tbh. It's all the more crueler that the prince had to grow up as a Beast and adds to his identity-complex when Bell first sees him, and it explains why the castle was in such disarray when Bell first arrives. (since years have passed)
To tell the truth I never saw him as a young kid. In the 1991 version it's said the "rose would bloom until his 21st year." I took that to mean he was 21 when it started wilting, and it had been wilting slowly. He could have been anywhere in his teens when cursed. By the end he was somewhere in his twenties.
David Kreiger Hey little 12 year old boy don't be stingy or hundreds of people will be horribly punished and you'll be turned into a furry but have no sex life.
'I'm going ti bed before either of you cone up with a great plan ti get us killed. Or worse... Expelled' GET REKT VOLDEMORT... THERE IS SOMETHING WORSE THEN DEATH!
There’s a theory about beauty and the beast You know how the candle said they’d been there for 10 years right well the story says he’s 21. So the prince was 11 when when he was cursed. ELEVEN. And people might say maybe he didn’t age but they said he was doomed to GROW UP as a beast. I know the live action shows him as a grown up but I think that’s the wrong interpretation of the original. Also she cursed the REST OF THE CASTLE TO DIE OR LIVE FOREVER AS NON MOVING UTENSILS JUST FOR THE PRINCE’S ACTIONS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WITCH
am i the only one cringing at the super metallic auto-tuning in their voices??? i just came from the video on the original one, and goddamn that singing was gorgeous.... this stuff just makes me want to diiie
The biggest sin for me was during the Be our Guest scene with Belle. She literally just sits there and smiles while all that magical shit goes on around her. In the animated movie Belle was dancing and participating. Emma just sits still. That bothered the shit out of me!
That bugged me too, but I don't blame Emma for it. That was a director's issue. I was watching some of the bonus features that came with the blu ray and one of them was the making of the "Be Our Guest" scene; Emma tried to put a little bit more life into her performance there and was constantly asking, "is that too much?" Well apparently it was. Stupid director.
It makes more sense for Belle to be miserable than dancing around and happy. She's being held captive by the Beast, she can't leave the castle, she's never going to see her father again, and just prior to that scene, he'd shouted at her that if she didn't eat with him, she wouldn't eat at all. Would you be is particularly jovial mood after all of that happened?
I'm still surprised nobody sinned the fact that Belle remembers the windmill area, and says it's from her childhood, and yet she's a baby in the scene when they leave.
Brenna Montgomery Amen!!
Right before she sings, she says "It's so much smaller than I imagined" so all she knew about it was based on what Maurice had told her because she was too young to remember physically being there herself. It was still a part of her childhood though.
Brenna Montgomery hellooo don't you remember the music box Maurice was working on? It was literally a mini version of the windmill...and her father obviously was open to describe the home at one point in her life he just left out the part about how her mom died
I appreciate the responses...I admittedly did not put as much thought into that part of the movie. The movie itself added a lot more details that took a lot of thought, and I was confused by the way they worded it. I mean, it was a very haphazard explanation of how she knew, only through one song lyric and Maurice telling her stories about it that we never saw or explained in-movie.
I honestly really enjoyed this movie, and saw it in theaters twice. But the original is my favorite Disney movie of all time, so really this was kinda a fan fiction for me. It was visually beautiful. At the same time, I had a good laugh at this Cinema Sins and agreed with a lot of the sins. Cheers!
Emma Watson playing a bookworm in a castle full of enchanted objects is further proof I'm watching a Harry Potter movie.
and that emma watson can play one role... almost
She's a bookworm in a magical castle in over 8 movies i am starting to think thats the only role she'll play in any movie
YASSS MAH POTTAHHEADS
"Shut up Hermoiny!!" XD
This comment is better than any of this guys videos
“But that was way back YESTERDAY, so I’m sure he’s worked through his shit now”
The sarcasm in all of these video is simply magnificent.
😂
@Amazon Rose I think the live-action French version was more fantastical IMHO. Lea Seydoux did great. hellogiggles.com/reviews-coverage/casts-american-vs-french-beauty-and-the-beast/
Oliyu Primizhu dude I would totally like this but it’s at 666 likes now and there’s no fucking way I’m messing up that masterpiece
"You know, I WAS stronger than you yesterday."
"Yeah, but that was a year ago. We've all grown."
@@Ponera-Sama no one gets your obscure dbza references, stop trying
May I point out that Belle's yellow dress is very underwhelming?
Agreed. I think they got it from Wish.
Gail Wiley agreed completely i just finished a junior theatre musical where a TWELVE year old played belle and her acting singing and costumes was way better
Looks like the wrong color again yule ball dress
Apparently there was this news article saying that a five year old helped make it 🤨
Ouat belle has better yellow dress.
Why the servants weren't animals!? The curse, was to show perspective. The servants saw the Prince as a "beast". The Prince saw the servants as "objects".
Ben Adama like it would make sense and it would be at least a bit more easier the bird was not helpful anyway she was just singing
Crispy, a new rendition of this old story doesn't change the original concept of what the curse meant or stood for.
Disney was not the first to use inanimate objects.
Who said that? xd
Nobody.
I remember leaning over to my mother during the movie and jokingly saying: "Belle's mom probably died of plague, or something." Then when plague was revealed, both my mom and I cackled for a few short seconds.
Span you my friend, are a terrible person :D
LOL
Another sin: We see in the beginning of the movie the librarian is Belle's only real friend in town. In the scene where Gaston locks up Maurice and Belle and rallies the town to kill the beast, the librarian is shown to not agree. But the question is, what happens to him? We don't see him at all at the castle, implying that he stayed in town. But if he stayed in town, why was he not at least attempting to help Belle escape the asylum wagon? Question's bothered me for months.
Maybe they locked him up somewhere?
*DING!!*
Dalia Rose, he was brutally murdered
He's the only black guy in the movie
Dalia Rose he was the town priest
no one is gonna lock up the priest
You forgot how to sin Gaston for being French and not knowing what je ne sais quoi meant
I don't no what that means
@@LucyAdroit I'm not, but I'm sure it's what it means"I don't know", linguistics classes yay!
@@SomeoneUDK00 you are correct. In different contexts it can mean "A certain quality not able to be explained." More blunt "I don't know why."
Je ne said quoi = that something special,
I learned that during a movie, an American girl movie.
That’s concerning that a French man doesn’t know that.
That's the whole joke though 😂
You know CinSins is about to tear your movie apart when sin #1 is "this movie exists" 😂
snoop loops Ha ha ha ha. Every time.
No mentions of the constant and obvious autotune? That's a sin for you.
Gemini the Stellar Dreamer
*DING*
4:48
The thing is. Emma Watson actually can sing, not greatly, but decently. They could've spent the autotune budget on singing lessons. Look at Mamma Mia, none of those actors were really good singers, but they spent their money and time where they should've.
Toon Holman That is why to this day I was so disappointed to know Emma Watson was cast as Belle. She isn't that kind of actress suited for films like this.
Scattered Thoughts my issue with La La Land. It’s about starving, yet talented artist that haven’t met their chance, and yet they hired actors that literally can’t perform the art that they’re supposed to be portraying. Love Emma Stone, but so many actresses can actually sing and act and are waiting for their breakout moment, but the movie picked already known names.
The back of my DVD blurb just said: “A heavily auto tuned girl falls in love with a yak.”
LMAAOOO
Autotune and the Yak.
SwirlyHeadM8 -
“Autotune and the Yak”, sounds like a failed animated Disney show.
@Anakin SkyWalker Actually that's the name of a local legal-teen group who sing at the local bar on some nights.
Wow!
What a coincidence.
@@MasterAnakinSkyWalker well if it's the name for this movie, then that description fits perfectly.
“That’s bookcist.”
Like to end bookcism 😂
Yes lol
In the real story beast was a child when the enchantress came to the castle so it makes sense that he was scared and disgusted by a woman that randomly came into his kingdom.
Yeah or came to his front door when he has no parents
@@Skyebright1 I've been seeing alot of people getting upset about this funny detail being pointed out. like do people actually hold this against the movie?
Why was the part where Beast threw a goddamn snowball the size of a soccer ball at Belle's face not included?! That shit had me dying in the theater when I first saw it. Happened during the song Something There and Belle was completely unharmed lol
LovePatchSour I was looking for this comment! Honestly the highlight of the movie
I remember seeing a scene of that on UA-cam, the moment he smacked her with said snowball, they rolled the credits
That part was in the original movie, albeit it happened on the background when the staff watches them.
Same 😂
THAT HAD ME CRYING
He broke her freaking skull against the frozen pavement
And then hE'S JUST LIKE " *HEH* "
That growl at the end when she asks about him growing a beard is SO cringy.... like it could have been sexy in a totally different context... but given the age gap and the complete lack of chemistry they have... *cringe*
@Jalen Elrod Well in the original, Belle is 17 and the beast is 21.
There's not a big age gap. Belle would've only had to wait till her next birthday to be with him legally
No, it's just creepy. Like I'm laughing, but I'm laughing out of fear 😂😭😂
FoodandFaithfulness yup
Weeble Flufflycakes yup
The "this movie exists" sin for all these live action remakes are extremely satisfying
How much CGI can you have before the you have to change the label from "live-action" to "animated"?
What about Jungle book? That had loads of CGI
David Hong CGI never really gets considered animated
I'm guessing it depends on how real the CGI looks?? I don't know, I feel like at least Jungle Book should be considered animated. Literally everything is CGI except for the boy :/
At least it's good CGI
Nikodimos Triaridis That's an Insult to Bioware
Doesn't this film just make you...long for the days when actors were hired for their ability to actually act, sing and dance. You know like ppl with talent should be hired.
nope, since they autotuned all of emma watson's singing in this movie.
Movie is my favorite
😂✊🏿Right On
But she played sweet bookish Hermione in Harry Potter, technology can supplement for the actual talent required to perform in a musical (#sarcasam). Emma Watson's acting is passable (as Hermione). But I too miss kinda looking for good singers and not tweaking so-so ones.
The Dawn of Vanlife yup
Wow this channel has turned from pointing out things that are actually mistakes to roasting the shit out of a movie 😂
Adrian Ramirez This only happens when Jeremy truly hates a movie and this one deserved it. They should have done a bonus round for all the scenes copied line for line from the animated version.
Alexej Harm That's racist
Adrian Ramirez I like it when they point out actual mistakes a lot better
Yeah he literally complained about the same sin twice, the whole witch wiping everyone's memory of the prince and then saying why does no one remember the prince.
Actually I agree with Alexej; based solely on the time period the film takes place in there shouldn't be any black people at all. It's something that bugs me when films just put black people in roles where, to be historically accurate, they shouldn't be. Same thing for Frozen; people keep bitching about them all being white, because it's set in Norway in what, the early 1900s? No black people there then, either. Honestly.
For sin #63 the enchantress changed them into what they saw of each other. The staff saw him as a beast/monster so that's what she turned him into. As for the staff, the beast merely saw them as things. For example, cogsworth was turned into a clock. In the beginning of the movie you can se him holding a pocket watch saying, "master its *time.* " so I hope that answer people's questions 😁
Hey, thank you
Also, they used stock lion/tiger roars for the wolves and thought we wouldn't notice.
Are you serious?
HoopsAndDinoMan Seriously?
well clearly basing this off of some earlier replies people didn't notice too much
FUCK THIS MOVIE I HAD TO WATCH THIS IN THEATERS AND IT SUCKED!!!!
HoopsAndDinoMan the meaning I don't know
+5 sins for the terrible use of Autotune (since it's used multiple times. And is horrible and distracting). Also, +1 for ruining Belle's iconic yellow dress! I know Emma was being a modern feminist or whatever and refused to wear an actual corset, but they could have at least made a dress that looked like it had a corseted bodice or, for that matter, ANY styling whatsoever consistent with the time period! That was an entirely modern-day dress in a movie set in the 1700's. And even if you go with the original Disney version's setting of the 1800's, it's still a dress 200+ years out of place.
じょん Tell that to Emma Watson, she's the one who pushed that agenda. Corsets ftw
Y'know, after suffering the final dress and its gloriously plain tropicality, I'm not even maf anymore. I just feel empty inside.
feminists these days are fucking stupid. Like honestly, its nothing like before. They just get mad over stupid shit instead of talking about real issues. cOrSeTs
Y’all are bitching over a choice to not wear a piece of clothing. Accept the fact you wasted money watching the movie and leave the theater. lmao
I'm a modern feminist, and I made my own corset solely for back support!
Not to mention that, while the plague still sprouted out occasionally and killed people in the 1700s, it was 200 years past it's peak, and there weren't plague doctors, but the movie wanted to make sure everyone knew it was plague by throwing in a plague doctor mask which was 200 years too vintage for this movie.
It was so unnecesary when people died from everything back then. Childbirth could be a more suitable option.
@@vilwarin5635 yes
“Harmonious Hermione” LMFAO made my day 🤣😍
Same
Ok
He should have taken a sin off for Harmonious Hermione 🤣
sounded autotuned
@@88happiness that's not how it works lol
The shot of them dancing in the original animated film as the camera pans all around them in the ballroom was literally the only reason I wanted to even see this film, and it wasn’t there. Unlike a book where you just copy the script almost apart from some adjustments you literally had the script and shots from a animated classic, and you copied so many things from the original but not the one famous scene this movie is known for 😂
You ruined watching movies for me. Now I sin movies in the theaters.
D'Arby same :( also ruined movies I kinda liked. But I gotta stay W O K E
D'Arby Movies ?Books games tv shows
Sometimes but not nearly as much. Mainly movies.
Sadly I was doing this before I knew of cinemasins, He noticed more than I did though.
D'Arby It's worse for me. I sin video games and some shows as I watch/play them.
But...what about the offensive levels of autotune...?
Kae I know! I feel terrible for people who work hard on their voices, then AutoTune comes along and ruins everything. But it sounds so artificial. It's simply hideous.
Kae That's the editors fault for leaving the strong robotic auto tune in.
Kae it fucking hurts my ears and im so frustrated because who ever the fuck plays beat has a un- auto tuned version of evermore on the album and its 100 times better than the movie.
Kae I'm so glad that others feel the same way! Way too much auto tune.
The Autotune in this movie is straight out offensive. You take a musical. And cast TWO people for the LEADING roles who can not sing and have to be autotuned to oblivion. And one of thems appearance doesn't even matter because he's freaking CGI 99% of the movie.. Seriously? Seriously? I am just baffled at this.
Belle seeming to be out of focus and smiling for no apparent reason during the Be Our Guest scene is because in reality Emma Watson was filmed separately from other actors just sitting in a chair in a room in which she was the only cast member present. In reality, she was smiling and giggling at crew members telling her jokes during takes.
They must've been really crappy jokes, or she's not a very good actress...or both.
*The aesthetics of this movie were **_beautiful_**.* But the producers/directors spent to much time on background characters then Belle and the Beast, making their love gradually grow. They missed the entire point of the movie, the story. And that's why I really hate it. Again beautiful, but no point.
Even if they did it couldn't convince me, because Dan Stevens gave a scarily accurate performance in The Guest, whereas Emma Watson delivered one in Regression, so I couldn't shake the thought of two people dancing, who played convincing and lethal sociopaths.
Stevens is such a badass, during his performance in Legion, he hasn't simply opted for a convincing American accent, but also changed his voice, so when his actual voice came up near the end, he made me totally forget that he's a Brit with a much deeper voice.
Akos Barati I’ve never heard him with a deeper voice.
You can feel it in your heart *plays harry potter theme*
The Feels.
AmShaan YYYYESSEEEEEESSSSSS
That's what comes after the line? Cause I heard nothing, it's just silence for me... could it be a copyright infringement issue - only in specific countries?
You missed a pun opportunity.. instead of "that's booksist" you could have said "that's textist"
SomeHumanOnThe Internet what do you mean?
i think they mean it as a pun on sexist
When the Beast is reading a book about "King Arthur and his knights",it`s a reference to Dan Stevens playing Lancelot in Night at the Museum 3 as a sort-of villain.
That's Texas!
sin
Be Our Guest is supposed to be a culinary spectacular and Belle JUST SITS THERE!
I can't wait for him to roast the fuck out if the Emoji Movie.
No. You're wrong. That will not ever happen, because the Emoji Movie is going to be the greatest and single most important film of all time. It _oozes_ with originality, is visually stunning, and is bound to have the most amazing script in all of entertainment history. Just you wait and see.
say that to 🅱ee movie
8bit Nuke lmao 😂
Yeah, it must suck. It has the word "emoji" in it. And we're supposed to hate millenial phrases more and more as millenials get younger and younger. Right.. logic.
dude millenials are from 1977 - 1995 uuuuuuuh
“Damn the prince looks like he’s totally ready to chill down at the beach and knock back some sick cold ones, bruh” That part had my dying 😂
How are you not sinning the AUTOTUUUUUUNE
Oof
Emma Watson is an awful actress
Ella than why did she get in the movie
Jason because she is popular and if the movie has popular people in it people are more likely to go see it.
@@Possumkingthefirst When she got into to Harry Potter no one knew about her.Her good acting is the reason she is popular
Emma's so autotuned it hurts.
Honestly wouldn’t be surprised if this was a Harry Potter spin-off disguised as a Beauty and the Beast remake, with the adventure being about Hermoine, and cheating on Ron for a Beast.
first sin: "this movie exists"
oh how I love when Jeremy truly despises a movie. this is gonna be good.
Don't like this comment any further becuase it is 127, the amount of sins in this video
Yusuf Selman Abacı I'm sorry to tell you this, but it's gone over 200 now. Damn these people!
He only says that because the remake didn't NEED to exist, it doesn't mean "this sucks so bad it shouldn't exist"
Julie 1
None of yo' bidness ,
"THIS MOVIE EXISTS" Sin is back!!
"That's bookcist." lol
That's textist! Lol, someone else pointed out that alternative, and I wish it had been used.
I can't wait for Jeremy to take on the 2019 Cats movie. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
lmfaooo
The whole movie is a sin, no need to.
He'll have to give it like 100 sins right off the bat just for existing, though
"Gandalf and Obi Wan share a brief moment before heading off to fight Voldemort" That's was awesome xD
Shit, someone send this to Jacksfilms.
Cinema Sins you forgot that Gaston's telescope can look that far in the village and perfectly pinpoint Belle from about 10 miles away
Edit: Holy Cow my sarcastic a$$ comment got ALOT of likes!
Gastonception--that's what it was.
I just noticed that
I’ve been subbed to CinemaSins for a long ass time. And now they’re consistently getting number 1 on trending. I love watching great channels grow.
Nicolaj Nielsen Fuck off!
Yeah just like logan
0:47 "Who has the door right behind the throne in the throne room?" That would be a good question if it was, in fact, a throne room. It's not. It's very clearly a ball room. The throne is because he's a) the host, and b) a prince.
Not to mention full of himself.
Dang, this version of “Be Our Guest” has absolutely zero energy, almost like they weren’t even trying to make it sound and look good.
Agree
@Melat Gebeyehu actually I think it's more of a -1/10
Lmaoooo worst thing is it took three years to shoot and it ended up looking dead and unalive
It made me cry in the theatre lol im 31. I loved it
The animated version was better but Ewan Macgregor's singing is pretty good
the hermione voice over at the end killed me
selphie Same!
Rip in peace.
rip means ''rest in peace'' so you just wrote rest in peace in peace...
Flame Raptor lmao
A sin is only a sin if it sins a sin so sinful, it makes other sins a sin
Mustafa Chaudhry Truer words were never spoken.
Mustafa Chaudhry so fate of the sins?
Mustafa Chaudhry yes
There can be no Redemption without Sin.
I'd say so.
I actually really liked Beast's "evermore" solo, but that came from the Broadway version so doesn't really get the movie any credit
Evermore is original to the movie. On Broadway Beast's song is If I Can't Love Her. He sings it closing Act I and reprises it after he lets Belle go (which also gives her a quick change moment).
I can't believe nobody's talking about the OBVIOUS horrible autotune they had to give Emma Watson. Like holy shit it was bad
Blue A and yet it still made 1 billion dollars in box office. But I gotta admit, the song that the beast sang made me feel sorry for him and kind of hit me in the feels.
I know! It's so bad.
Two more sins:
1) This is set in France, right? So why is the book in the scene where Belle teaches the girl to read in ENGLISH?
2) Did anyone noticed that when the horse runs from the castle to Belle's village it is completely dirty? But funny enough in the next scene when they head to the castle it is perfectly clean. Seems like Belle was like "Omg! My dad's in danger but I better clean this horse, bc maybe the guy who has captured him is my future husband😍"
You know how in guardians of the galaxy all the aliens speak perfect English? Well same reason here, just cause they speak English and sound English doesn't mean they are English, its the movie translating for the appropriate audience
You'd be good at Cinema Sins.
"if not he would be doomed to remain a beast for all time"
Wait does that mean he would be immortal if the curse isnt broken?
1st- BECAUSE THE MOVIE IS IN ENGLISH
Iam Emma then why was the menu in French?
Anyone else just a wee bit concerned that Lumiere's girlfriend is made of highly flammable feathers?
yes, but I was more concerned that they changed her damn name. "Plumette" sounds ridiculous. That's not a name someone would have.
Probably because "Plume" is french for "feather" so Plumette makes sense for the character
She didn't say it didn't make sense, she said it was ridiculous. Which it is.
caseymac MacL that was a big thing with their relationship. While they were cursed they would always talk about how they can't be together because it was DANGEROUS!
So that way in case they catch fire she'll die of a burning love.
Missed outtake opportunity:
Gaston: It’s hero time...
* _Ben 10_ transformation effect ensues *
*Gandalf and Obi-wan share a brief moment before heading off to fight Voldemort.*
Light Yagami while Hermione tags along with nanny mcphee
Light Yagami I would pay to watch that movie.
Honestly they wasted Evan McGregor in this. Seriously.
16:08 Everyone's following Gaston, who remembers where Maurice said where the castle was, therefore, the villagers can find the castle. The real sin is the fact that they're actually able to go there this time when Maurice just looked like an idiot when he tried to show Gaston
One thing that really annoys me is how much you can hear the auto tune in belles voice
Jon Arbuckle at least it’s not as bad as Descendants.....
352 650 lol yeah..... stupid beard joke
it srsly gets worse each time you hear it.
I can't help to think that the amount of pressure the castle staff gave Belle along with their backstory...is a killer guilt trip.
Also, how the heck is this wolf pack aggressive if they looked healthy. Sure wolves can attack and kill people, but they only do so if they're too old or sick to hunt natural prey like deer and such, so there's no way they would be hunting Belle or her father in the first place.
Dylan Hooton mostly likely because she put them there to keep people from finding it and the beast from leaving
Well, it could also be because there was a time (and in the movie they are in that time) when humans were prey for wolfs, and wolfs usually also eat regularly.
are you a fucking zoologist all of a sudden?
Common mistake. These are fairy tale wolves. Fairy tale wolves are always mean and blood -thirsty . Always. Except the ones in the jungle book, for unknown reason. Also, that's exactly where the prejudices against wolves came from. People couldn't differ fairy tale wolves from real normal ones, though it's obviously two different species. Fairy tale ones also are much bigger and always hungry and have darker fur for example.
well because wolves are usually the blood thirsty villains in films and shit... sorry but i wrote this then I saw the Jane Doe covered it XD
Good job CinemaSins, now every time I see a movie, I sin it as I watch it. **ding**
Oh, and every time in a TV show or movie I hear that Wilhelm Scream, well... **OBLIGATORY WILHELM SCREAM** I think, as I make a mental youtube video and imagine pissing off millions of fanboys and fangirls alike **ding**
You're welcome, I actually enjoyed typing this **ding**
Emily Evans
17:42 The prince was a dick again, and then France was cursed into becoming a white-flag waving surrendering bitch.
TheUnspeakableFrog11 Epic Frog Queen what is the average amount of sins you give?
TheUnspeakableFrog11 Epic Frog Queen I find myself saying to shows and movies "He/She survives this."
Same
17:36, , "Gandalf and Obi-wan share a brief moment before heading off to fight Voldemort"😂😂!!
We just gonna have to live with the fact that live action remakes are stooopid
The CRINGE "you should grow a beard" line at the end
"Oh, fuck you movie" hahah I died
Emma Hellmer to be a good thing
I actually liked that they put that line in. If I recall correctly, in the original animated version, one of the creators was debating whether or not to put that line in because they actually liked the way the Beast looked before he was turned back into a human, but I think they decided not to. I'm glad they used it here as a reference to that, although again, that's if I'm recalling correctly.
The Toontastic Toon I think the sin was more to how he growled like the beast.
As a fan of both this remake and death metal, I've always wondered the same thing.
Emma Hellmer I think they should've changed that scene to having Belle ask what to call him since he's not a beast anymore
No mention of how Gaston looks like Robbie Rotten?
I can't unsee that.
Crollingin Meishkin Omfg you ruined Gaston for me now
Evryl Woon Wow
Shiiit now I will never not see him as Robbie rotten 😂😭
Did you just ruin Luke Evans for me?
I think you just ruined Luke Evans for me
She's never going to get away from being Hermione
It's kind of sad...
I liked this movie...
...it's because I've yet to see the 1991 version, isn't it?
when i saw this for the first time i haven't seen the oringinal ethier and once i have i actually liked this one better just cause i saw it first but I also like The Beast and Belle's relationship better in this one.I can ignore the auto tune.
The beast looks better in the original, obviously Belle looks better in this one.
Me too
Yes, you are absolutely correct
I’ve seen both. And I LOVE this one.
When we watched this in the theatre, the scene where Belle runs out of the town singing and then is a few miles away, my husband leaned in and said "man, she's fast!". I immediately thought of this channel and started laughing hysterically!
CassieMarie Mills Ha! Damn. He would be great a Cinemasins then. Also, it's unfortunate you and your husband wasted your money on this trash.
Your husband sounds fun at parties.
You missed the sin where Lumier was singing Be Our Guest and when he had the tablecloth on he dabbed
"this movie exists" 😂😂😂
The devil came to steal kill and destroy. Jesus came to give you life and that more abundantly.
Long ago, a lamb 🐑 without spot and blemish would be sacrificed on an altar daily to remove sins🐑. God is Holy and to commune with God, you must be holy🙇. God made mankind to have FELLOWSHIP. He loved us💕.
The devil tempted Adam and Eve to sin, and when I thought about it, I would have sinned as well because it's human nature😳. The devil is still tempting people into sin today!
A curse was placed on mankind because of sin. God knew this would happen so before the foundations of the world He chose to come as man and redeem man🙆.
He created hell for Satan and his demons. God didn't create man mindless but He gives each of a choice to choose good or evil, life or death. That choice is in your hands today, even as it was with Adam and Eve.
Jesus is the Lamb without spot and blemish, God the Father's only begotton Son, who died to take away our sins. He gives us a chance to strive to be perfect, through love with the help of His Spirit.
We become SPIRITUALLY ALIVE when we believe in God's Son, as opposed to being spiritually dead after the fall of Adam.
God is pleased with faith. If you believe, repent and be baptized and you will receive 🎁the gift of His Holy Spirit. God's Spirit is full of Love and Mercy. He's gentle and compassionate. He is God! He is also dangerous to the devil. He will comfort you, help you, teach you and guide you. He will give you power to do work in His Name to advance His Kingdom, seeking and saving the lost.
Choose Jesus. Taste and see that God is good💖.
the fuck
Alright
+Real-life lies Well, at least it gave me a chance to catch up on sleep in one of those nice cinema chairs...
Oh, and San... you are sinning at the moment - excessive use of emojis is a mortal sin, dude.
Yeah, "this movie exists" actually surprised me. Just because it's something you see in the comments section of pretty much every video they do, but I can't recall CinemaSins themselves ever saying it before. Maybe they have and I just don't remember it. Just thought it was funny hearing them say it for once.
5:41
The witch lady erased their memories remember
You should have enough bad experience with erased memories, huh?
Love your username btw
The biggest sin of this movie was to want to "fix" the problem of the original movie : by doing it, or it makes no sense, or it leaves us with more questions than before
I laughed so fucking much at the end with the Hermione part, anyone else?
Maka Hunter Evans 666 me
Maka Hunter Evans 666 me!
ME
Maka Hunter Evans 666 when was the part?
waikikisterling xxxxxx ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccccccccccccccccccccddccddddddddddddddddddddddddddsssddddedddeeeeddddddffgffffffggffggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhnm.
When I watched this, the growl at the end shocked me so hard I couldn't stop laughing omfg.
Based on Film Theory the prince was prob only 12 when the witch came and was being had the proper “stranger danger” response
I lost it at the "ass eating an apple" sin. lmao!
But yeah, after reading the comments, I listened closely and...you can tell Emma Watson's singing is auto-tuned. Usually, I can't -- that's how obvious it was.
FireHeart321 it was the first thing I noticed when they aired the trailers. I went "no no no no no no no no"
I can't believe there are people to finance such productions, or to cast the wrong actors.... She can't sing doggamitt !!
Well she wasn’t only casted for her singing-
And also think about it, this movie wouldn’t be watched if they didn’t cast ‘Hermione Granger’ I don’t think it would be so famous-
Idk
@@char8532 it made the movie painful to watch though, the only belle thing she had were the looks
Wasn't the prince originally like...11 or something when he rejected the disguised fairy? Not a twisted or cruel man, but a child who answered the door late at night and turned away a scary looking stranger (yes, I'm aware of what hospitality traditions were like, but still, he was a kid). I guess they changed that to make the setup seem a little less "disproportionate retribution".
I read somewhere that he doesn't physically age in this movie as a beast, so he's the same age getting turned into one as he is returning back to human form
they probably did that so he was more of a jerk.
42
Well geeze! What am I supposed to do with all these large burlap bags marked "candy" that I keep in my white van?
Ari Safari
Then they should have made him eat an apple during that scene.
You wanna know the real loser in that movie?
That horse
That poor horse
Everyone’s complaining about Emma Watson being auto tuned. Does no one remember Descendants?
The thing that makes Emma's auto tune a bigger offense is that Paige O'Hara, the original voice actor for Belle, was her voice coach! And they still felt it was necessary to auto tune her after she had lessons from the most qualified professional they had. It's not like Meryl Streep in the first Mama Mia where they cast her regardless of the fact that she couldn't sing and let her sing terribly anyway. (Along with most of the rest of that cast in general.) And Streep only got voice lessons AFTER that role to be in other musicals. This is someone who tried to learn first, and they scrapped all that learning and made it meaningless.
She’s actually a pretty decent singer without auto tune, espiecially for having no previous knowledge at all!
Do you mean Descendants as in Disney Descendants. Because all of the cast could actually sing apart from a few of the boys. They weren't as autotuned as this.
"This movie exists". Man, it's so refreshing to hear that again.
How to fix the Disney plot hols. stick to the original the story : a loving prince who breaks his promise to his wife about hunting a magical dear that turns out to be his wife and the daughter of the forest god who curses him to be a relentless predator as a punishment. the roses are a symbol of his love for her and are magically part of her so Morris plucking one is more significant to him. the time he has been cursed is never given so we can assume he has been like that for probably hundreds of year which deals with the outside world not knowing about him plus the impossible to find castle. Bells desire for a flower is brought about because of her love of plants and the fact that their recent impoverished state means she can not grow any roses and she would like her father to bring her one. oh and Gaston is a gambling greedy airhead who just wants money. so moral of the story: DON'T BREAK YOUR FUCKING PROMISES! and don't be a greedy materialistic a-hole.
Amanda Nield I like the original story better :)
In the original story I'm familiar with, there is no Gaston at all, rather Belle's selfish sisters are kinda the villains.
Exactly, thank you
That's not the actual origin story. Probably from the Grim Brothers. The origin story was based on a real life couple. The man had a rare disease where he had hair everywhere, including his face( like he was considered an actual Beast). He had an arranged marriage with a girl and their story was spread everywhere and led to this tale.
(However I am not entirely sure if this is the real origin cause the one you're talking about doesn't really make any sense. Not saying you're wrong..srry)
@@rachelhughes8487 Yeah, pretty sure Gaston is all Disney.
"There is a beast and I've just come from the castle"
"You'd say anything to save your father"
Then where did she get the f**king dress?!
The magic closet duh
Lexa Wolf7 His point was he didn't notice her shiny yellow dress. Another stupid change in this movie.
Randomfools whoops wrong reply
My point was if she hadn't come from any magical castle then how else would she have gotten the dress? She's a farmer who probably doesn't earn anything without her father.
Movie thought this opera-singer-turned-wardrobe thing wasnt weird enough, so it gave her narcolepsy 😂😂😂
Anybody else watch CinemaSins so much that they told themselves "Narration" when they watched it for the first time?😂🖐
Yes! I also happen to say skip when the annoying person at work starts talking about stuff.
I watch a number of action movies/shows, so "They survive this" is my most common carryover.
The narration in the animated film was superb. A great voice, well read, good tempo (wasn't rushed). This version was as if a teacher was reading a 4th grade student's essay on Architectural brick work. zzzzzzzzzzzz
"Damn, all the sudden it's apparent that Maurice would be excellent at CinemaSins!"
*"Damn, all the sudden"*
*_"all the sudden"_*
MeowDraws ding
It should be 128 sins for not allowing Audra McDonald to sing Beauty and the Beast!
Oh yes!!! Without the autotune and with that operatic voice!
It should be 128 sins for this movie existing.
Truly!! She was so wasted in this movie!!
I have to admit, the graphics are Amazing and any movie with Emma Watson makes it feel like a Harry Potter Movie.
Finally got around to watching this movie and there are a few things you left out.
1. Why the hell does Belle always have the hem of her dress tucked in the waistband so it shows off her fugly bloomers?
2. The Beast apparently hates all bannisters, railings, and anything else that might keep you from falling off of stairs, balconies, and assorted walkways.
2. The fact that the dungeon thing has no back wall. Yeah, there's a drop off, but a sufficiently determined prisoner could probably escape.
3. If this is set in the 1700s, Belle' s lack of sleeves/gloves in her fancy dress is a no no. Showing of ladies elbows is indecent.
4. Maurice abandons his sick wife completely and utterly. Seriously, did he even go back to bury her or make sure she died?
5. Belle is a baby when Maurice moves her from Paris, which means she probably grew up in that town. So she needs to stop bitching about things sucking since they moved there. She doesn't remember Paris anyhow.
6. If the castle curse affects only those who live in the castle, why are Mr Potts and Mrs Cogsworth not objects? Do they not live with their families?
7. Movie ignores perfectly good songs from the stage version for much shittier ones that make the same points.
8. The Enchantress lady is the beggar woman from town, right? Gaston insults her a couple times. Why is he not cursed?
I think the "Showing elbows" thing might have been deliberate to show she's an outsider, might just be me.
Besides the elbows and Baby belle thing, i completely agree
Barbara Wilcox to refer to you #3:
If this set in the 1700’s then they royally screwed up their time line by adding that her mother died of plague. Seeing as the plague happen in Europe in the 1300 - 1400’s, with it peaking between 1346-1353. So if you look at it the movie is saying that Belle and her father are over 300 years old.
#1 They explain in one of the behind the scenes things on the DVD that her dress is like that because she loves to horseride, and having her dress like that made it easier for her to get on the horse (but I completely agree about the bloomers being fugly)
MusicTS23 the edges of the cell didn't appear rough like the wall had accidentally fallen away, nor were there any scars along the edges of the walkways high up that might indicate bannisters or railings may have crumbled or entire sections fell away. It looked deliberate.
When I first watched this, when Gaston said "I feel like I've been missing something," I said "What? A brain?"
Odd Lemon Maybe his wife died
THE HARRY POTTER REFERENCES ARE GIVING ME LIFE
Ruby Qnn n
HARMONIOUS HERMOINE XD
nabil fattu So now comments have advertisements.
Ruby Qnn you probably have the best comment on here and you're right about the Harry Potter references, I especially love the first reference where the baker quickly forgets something and he can't remember what he forgotten
But no Neville reference
The fact that Cinemasins though Evermore would be just another forgettable addition. That song made me and millions of others cry repeatedly
I love Evermore! 😍😍😍
Millions might be pushing it. I bet you NO kids cried while watching it and this movie (like all disney remakes) is aimed at small children bc Disney assumes kids are stupid and they will swallow all the Disney Remake sh*t they shovel down their throats.
At least the prince wasn't 12 this time...
David Kreiger see in ňwees
I thought that added some depth to the story, tbh. It's all the more crueler that the prince had to grow up as a Beast and adds to his identity-complex when Bell first sees him, and it explains why the castle was in such disarray when Bell first arrives. (since years have passed)
To tell the truth I never saw him as a young kid. In the 1991 version it's said the "rose would bloom until his 21st year." I took that to mean he was 21 when it started wilting, and it had been wilting slowly. He could have been anywhere in his teens when cursed. By the end he was somewhere in his twenties.
mrsbasia122 It also shows how ducked up the enchantress is for cursing a child for being responsible.
David Kreiger
Hey little 12 year old boy don't be stingy or hundreds of people will be horribly punished and you'll be turned into a furry but have no sex life.
"Harmonious Hermione" 😂😂😂👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
'I'm going ti bed before either of you cone up with a great plan ti get us killed. Or worse... Expelled'
GET REKT VOLDEMORT... THERE IS SOMETHING WORSE THEN DEATH!
This is how you watch a whole entire movie without having to pay
Edit: woah so many likes thx!!!
Anna F Well your technically watching the worst parts of the movie.
I know right. This video would basically be every single second of the film, if they didn't cut out most of the songs.
Illicit Films they have CinemaWins
Illicit Films So basically the whole movie
Usually, I'm not fond of someone talking during the movie..
There’s a theory about beauty and the beast
You know how the candle said they’d been there for 10 years right well the story says he’s 21. So the prince was 11 when when he was cursed. ELEVEN. And people might say maybe he didn’t age but they said he was doomed to GROW UP as a beast. I know the live action shows him as a grown up but I think that’s the wrong interpretation of the original. Also she cursed the REST OF THE CASTLE TO DIE OR LIVE FOREVER AS NON MOVING UTENSILS JUST FOR THE PRINCE’S ACTIONS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WITCH
Right? The servants are supposed to criticize a KING'S parenting? Yeah that's not gonna happen
Dude you forgot about the terrible, TERRIBLE auto tune
Caged Bird he said "Harmonius Hermione"
I didn't notice it until this comment section and now the movie is worse
am i the only one cringing at the super metallic auto-tuning in their voices??? i just came from the video on the original one, and goddamn that singing was gorgeous....
this stuff just makes me want to diiie
The biggest sin for me was during the Be our Guest scene with Belle. She literally just sits there and smiles while all that magical shit goes on around her. In the animated movie Belle was dancing and participating. Emma just sits still. That bothered the shit out of me!
That bugged me too, but I don't blame Emma for it. That was a director's issue. I was watching some of the bonus features that came with the blu ray and one of them was the making of the "Be Our Guest" scene; Emma tried to put a little bit more life into her performance there and was constantly asking, "is that too much?" Well apparently it was. Stupid director.
ImmaPandaRawr 10:25 please tell me that's not dabbing
ImmaPandaRawr she omg SNAP and the whole time i was just like...Emma just sat and smiled...on a table....thats.....depressing
It makes more sense for Belle to be miserable than dancing around and happy. She's being held captive by the Beast, she can't leave the castle, she's never going to see her father again, and just prior to that scene, he'd shouted at her that if she didn't eat with him, she wouldn't eat at all. Would you be is particularly jovial mood after all of that happened?
SHE HAS 1 FUCKING BITE OF FOOD LIKE THE WHOLE TIME ANYWAY
"This movie exists"
Lmaoooo 1st sin
XD! You caught me at the beginning!
......." This movie exists".
I had to pause on that one. I needed a minute.
did the same with the amazing spiderman.
juuzou suzuya And Cinderella
hello
0/10
There was no egg swallowing in Gaston's song
Feature Length well yeah because he would choke
Feature Length it's a live action movie
and if he cracked and ate them....food poisoning might be a problem...
Agreed, and there was no hair joke
And he didn’t snap a belt with his neck
you should have taken off a sin for josh gad. just. josh gad.
How dare you! He’s adorable!
@@ellakaiba3102 He said to take a sin off, not add a sin
When Gaston said ‘future wife”, all I could think of was The Room