I think knowledge can't be truly lost or destroyed. What is discovered can be discovered again. So there indeed can be Jungians all over the world without them knowing Jung. I once burned some of my notes and felt very sad. But I believe the same insights will come to me again.
Just for fun I would like to relate this old song. "Van Amburgh is the man, who goes to all the shows He goes into the lion's cage, and tells you all he knows; He sticks his head in the lion's mouth,and keeps it there a-while, And when he pulls it out again, he greets you with a smile. ... That Hyena in the next cage, most terrible to relate, Got awful hungry the other day, and ate up his female mate; He’s a very ferocious beast, don't go near him little boys, For when he's angry he shakes his tail, and makes this awful noise."
It seems that what makes analysis so fascinating is also what makes it so frustrating to grasp. It's the border where cold factual knowledge isn't enough and you need to develop a kind of je ne sais quoi to develop it. It melds multiple things and that also means it forces you to develop multiple skills, and perhaps that's why so many of Jung's students fell short because they took the teachings as more static things than fluid; like a recipe that is adapted to each single person. Perhaps, in order to be a good analyst, one has to be profoundly human. Develop all the facets of being a human and, simultaneously, polish themselves to be better.
Well here's the rest of the silly song which gives my heart some joy and hopefully yours too. "Next comes the Anaconda Boa Constrictor, oft called Anaconda for brevity, He's known throughout the whole wide world for his age and great longevity; He can swallow himself, crawl into himself, and crawl out again with facility, He can tie himself into a double-bow-knot with his tail, and smile with the greatest facility. The peacock is a pretty bird, his tail is wondrous fine, The Jay bird and the jackdaw are mad to see it shine, The Kangaroos are jumping, and rattling the cage door, Look out ye little boys, for the lion's going to roar. The monkey in the next cage, is cuffing his little brother, He's not to blame for doing that, for he learned it of his mother; The skin of his face is drawn so tight, and coverv'd o're with kinks, And when he winks, he's sure to gape, and when he gapes he winks. Next comes the Great Vulture, awful bird, from highest mountain's top, He's been known to eat up little girls, and then to lick his chops; The performance can't go on, there's too much noise and confusion, Ladies don't feed those monkeys cakes, you'll ruin their constitutions."
I think knowledge can't be truly lost or destroyed. What is discovered can be discovered again. So there indeed can be Jungians all over the world without them knowing Jung. I once burned some of my notes and felt very sad. But I believe the same insights will come to me again.
Knowledge is. Everything is Consciousness 🙏🏻
Just for fun I would like to relate this old song.
"Van Amburgh is the man, who goes to all the shows
He goes into the lion's cage, and tells you all he knows;
He sticks his head in the lion's mouth,and keeps it there a-while,
And when he pulls it out again, he greets you with a smile.
...
That Hyena in the next cage, most terrible to relate,
Got awful hungry the other day, and ate up his female mate;
He’s a very ferocious beast, don't go near him little boys,
For when he's angry he shakes his tail, and makes this awful noise."
I dare to say that analysis is three fold science art and happening more to the core semblance
It seems that what makes analysis so fascinating is also what makes it so frustrating to grasp. It's the border where cold factual knowledge isn't enough and you need to develop a kind of je ne sais quoi to develop it. It melds multiple things and that also means it forces you to develop multiple skills, and perhaps that's why so many of Jung's students fell short because they took the teachings as more static things than fluid; like a recipe that is adapted to each single person. Perhaps, in order to be a good analyst, one has to be profoundly human. Develop all the facets of being a human and, simultaneously, polish themselves to be better.
She's somewhat wise herself
somewhat???
Somewhat?!?!? Oh, She is Wisdom Itself 😊
@alteracco2715 you just triggered my shadow 😊 Oh, you're brilliant 👏🏻 thank you 🙏🏻
Well here's the rest of the silly song which gives my heart some joy and hopefully yours too.
"Next comes the Anaconda Boa Constrictor, oft called Anaconda for brevity,
He's known throughout the whole wide world for his age and great longevity;
He can swallow himself, crawl into himself, and crawl out again with facility,
He can tie himself into a double-bow-knot with his tail, and smile with the greatest facility.
The peacock is a pretty bird, his tail is wondrous fine,
The Jay bird and the jackdaw are mad to see it shine,
The Kangaroos are jumping, and rattling the cage door,
Look out ye little boys, for the lion's going to roar.
The monkey in the next cage, is cuffing his little brother,
He's not to blame for doing that, for he learned it of his mother;
The skin of his face is drawn so tight, and coverv'd o're with kinks,
And when he winks, he's sure to gape, and when he gapes he winks.
Next comes the Great Vulture, awful bird, from highest mountain's top,
He's been known to eat up little girls, and then to lick his chops;
The performance can't go on, there's too much noise and confusion,
Ladies don't feed those monkeys cakes, you'll ruin their constitutions."
How are archetypes scientific?
Archetypes are. "Science" is an archetype itself 😊
@@AnaAuriga28 What I mean is how can the existence of archetypes be shown through scientific method?
@mertkusluvan3107 Everybody talking about the same all throughout the world, arriving at the same conclusions... archetypal wisdom.