I own one of these lenses, used it almost exclusively on my last vacation. I think its flexibility is its strength. I was on a safari at the end of the trip and the lens made it easy to capture photos of animals from a distance.
XT-5 user here for the last year. I have been shooting Nikkor glass via a Fringer. Great stuff, but while my NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR is a FINE lens, combined with the Fringer is a heavy, unbalanced beast. An awesome looking one for sure, but tiring when working street and events. This is my first native X fit lens, and MPB just sent me one that was in the OEM box and that I could not tell a difference from unboxing new. It's as light as my beloved NIKKOR 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR (actually a bit less without the Fringer) and is balanced perfectly. Sleek (almost too much so) and the focus is instant! The zoom ring is a bit stiff, but that's OK as I sure won't worry about lens creep. And a very big surprise for me (something that no one seems to mention) is that at a full 300mm extension, there is ZERO wiggle or slop! You are right about the construction feel. Metal has its own aura--but all plastics are not created equally. I feel the plastic--but it has a nice dense, solid, well-made feel. Not as substantial as the substance of metal barrels, but a hell of a lot lighter to tote around! I think that this one is a keeper...
I recently bought one of these in Sony emount. I have several fast prime lenses that I use for specific shooting situations. But, the 18-300 is on my camera all the time. It's an excellent all around lens that works well for just about any impromptu shooting situation I find myself in. A very useful lens and well worth the price.
I own the Fujifilm X-T5, the Fujinon 10-24mm f4, also the 23mm f2, the Fujinon 35mm f1.4 (legend) and the 18-200mm from Tamron. All are really decent lenses for different needs but the Tamron is simply just a weapon when you don't know what's gonna happen and you wanna be prepared for all kinds of shots. ;-) I love it although I use mostly the 23mm and the 10-24mm as I do street and travel photography mostly. But when I'm a a zoo for example the 17-300 is just a no brainer.
I'm considering this for Urbex photography. A lot of places I go have limits as to where I can physically go without putting myself in danger, so a higher zoom will help with that. And not having to change the lens in dusty, dirty environments is a massive added bonus.
Ok I got this lens today. It will not be the most sharpest lens but sharpness is better than I expected. I actually never buy super zooms, mostly primes. But hauling with a bag full of lenses is not a picknick either. With good light and ISO at 800 the shutter speeds are high enough. Even at F8. Great adition to my Fujifilm gear.
I think it's a great lens for landscape photographer because you don't need wide open ap. like 1.8 - 2.8. You need f8 and more usually (f11, f16). So if you connect old body like X-T3 with this lens on a tripod - you'll achieve great results!
@traffbros no it won’t. Why’d you say that? I very often shoot between f9 and f11 and not a problem with softness. Did you experience issues with this lens?
@@cris_photography lower megapixel cams won't be as affected as higher megapixel ones, but on aps-c diffraction starts to kick in at around f8-f-11. Have a look
could you please compare video for Tamron 18-300 to Fuji 70-300? would like to know how these two compare with respect to image sharpness, image stabilization etc
I have one since a month. I appreciate its flexibility, ideal for travel photography, photo walks ,... Pictures quality is good, AF is quite decent considering Fuji in general. So I think it is perfect for one lens, outdoor activities, vacation etc
The example photos of the 90mm definitely aren’t both at F5… The bokeh difference is way too drastic. I think you accidentally posted the 90mm image at f2
Hi Cris! Thank you very much for doing a great review on the Tamron 18-300! You just sold one! I just purchased an XT3, and have been looking for a lens just like this for it. When I used to shoot a Nikon D70s, I had Tamrons 18-200, and absolutely loved it. I expect I'll love this one the same.
Just ordered this lens and having switched from Olympus, Nikon and, here it comes, Leica Q2 ( ?!? ) the reason I ordered it was as you say in the video, to try out what I prefer in focus length. What do I like? In my life, how do I shoot? What is it that I need? My oh my, I've got grandchildren now… Now, you might say having owned a host of cameras and lenses, shot more pics than I care to count, I should know what style, what preferences, what feel in a picture I want. Not to mention that I sold my Leica Q2 due to the fact that I found myself trapped in the focus length. I know, I know, but that's a personal experience and you know… it just wasn't me, was it? But my god, what a camera! Jeeezus… So having just switched to Fuji X-T4, I have to reinvent myself. And this is a lens that lets me explore what I want from a lens and what focus length I use. Or tend to use. To be creative. To find that childish, youthful kid in me that lent my dads camera to just play with… and now and again actually got a decent picture doing it. ( And for all of you out there that's focusing on tech, “searching for sugerman” was partially shot with an iPhone. It went and got an Oscar. And more photographers than just Todd Hido uses one now and then. So have fun! Just shoot some pictures 😉 )
Thanks! Great perspective and in totally see what you mean - can tell you’ve been taking photos for a while 😌 hope this lens will help you reinvent yourself and find the youthful kid in you - when photography achieves that no mater the gear used, it has accomplished its purpose imho. Take care and thanks for what gin the video
I think there is a mistake at 4:01. I think you accidentally inserted a picture from the 90mm fuji wide open. It does not make sense for them to be so different.
Hello, no, i triple checked the EXIF and it is the same aperture. It’s a 90mm so am not that shocked to be honest. But yes, the difference is insane! Cheers
@@cris_photography Thanks for checking. That is super surprising. Does the 90mm focus breaths like crazy? I see the camera in the picture is bigger from the Fuji lens. So in reality at this distance the 90mm is more like 120mm? Also, were the exposures the same (same ISO, shutter speed?). Other possibility is that the Tamron is not truly a f/5 at 90mm.
Noticed this as well. There should be little difference in DoF providing same focal length and aperture settings. Appreciate the video either way I have the 70-300mm but the 18-300 would be an alternative or better choice depending on use case.
Thanks Cris! I travel with a 3 lens setup, so this is probably not ending up in my kit. I would travel with a 23 f/1.4 or 35 f/1.4 lens, a Sigma 18-50 2.8 Zoom, and either the Fuji 55-200 or 70-300 lens (mostly the Fuji for its faster aperture). At the moment I have the Fuji 18-55 and 35 mm f/2, and looking at the Fuji 55-200 to complete my travel kit :)
Teacher, may I ask, I currently use x-t4, the lenses are xf16, xf56, xf70-300, I am sure to buy tamron 150-500mm, but I also like tamron 17-70 and tamron 18-300, if it is you , tamron 17-70, tamron 18-300, xf70-300, these three lenses, choose two or one, how would you choose, can you give me a reference??? Thank you
Hi there, thanks for your message. It very much depends on what you want to do with your lenses and the type of photography. The 17-70 has a better aperture throughout but the 18-300 is much more versatile in well lit environments. The 70-300 is a very nice and well made lens but if you need to go wider you’ll have a problem. You need to decide if you a) need a wider aperture and b) what type of framing you’ll need to have and if you need wider than 70mm. Hope that helps take care
I just ordered this lens Used for 499-00 US.. Sadly I saw your review after I pulled the trigger. Let's see how I like it... I think I may go for the Xf 50-140 just spend the money not as much reach but Quality. Im shooting Xpro2 and Xt4.. Will let you know.
Excellent question. Unfortunately I have t tested the 50-230mm so can’t tell you. However and that been said, i would tho l the Fuji lens might be a tad sharper (as for most of my Fuji prime lenses) but that is not a tested opinion. Might do a video comparing the 2 - why not. Take care
I would personally get the XC 50-230mm. This is my favorite. Even I have the 70-300mm. 18-300mm becomes out of focus and extremely blurry. 50-230mm is surprisingly not like that even if it is varifocal. The IOS is even better with the 50-230mm than the Tamrons. The only downside of the XC 50-230 is the plastic mount. While the Tamron 18-300 has a versatile range. Good for vacation and minimalist. But quality wise overall, video and photos, I would NOT get the Tamron. As for sharpness, Tamron lack in this area as well. For quality photos, I would not go for the 18-300mm. But for vacation, fast and light travel, 18-300mm is good if you dont care about photo quality.
Did you try putting a ring for the focus pulling? This is not a lens made for video originally so you will have to use a ring that will allow you to use it with a focus pulling system.
Thx for making this review! The lens seems really nice. How does it compare to the Fujinon XF18-135mm? Currently deciding which one to get (mainly vacation photography) ;)
Thanks. Well you really do gain the extra length (up to 300mm vs 135mm). They are very similar to be honest but I’d root for Fujifilm in terms of image quality (due to the size and versatility of the Tamron lens) but for an « all in one » type of lens I’d take Tamron. Hope that helps. Take care
the only downside for me is that i cant change the diafragma myself , and that it automatically changes light for you . Is there any way i can fix that ?
Which do you prefer between this lens and fuji xf18-135 ? I am considering about the lighter weight and the more focal length which is more useable for me.
Hello there. Honestly it really depends on your needs. I like fuji better for the quality of the lens but the Tamron lens is very good too for the price and it really is very versatile. Cheers
If you’re set to 6.3 there won’t be any change. However if you’re set to a lower aperture and you zoom, the aperture will vary as you zoom in (since it can’t open as much when it’s zoomed in)
@@cris_photography Oh ok. Reason I'm asking is cos the Fuji 2.8 and f4 zooms have a bad exposure stepping when zooming in video. If the Tamron doesnt have that issue then I'll be hopeful about the tamron 17-70 coming to x mount
Thank you for the video! Does the zoom lock only work to keep it at 18mm, or can it be activated to keep it fixed at 50mm, for example? I ask this because a Canon lens I had only locked at the shortest focal distance, and when taking pictures pointing downwards, the zoom would automatically increase. It was terrible.
Ciao Duilio, ti capisco! È stato una bella sorpreso quando l’ho provato, non mi aspettavo una qualità d’immagine così alta. Se ne hai l’occasione, provalo, penso che ti piacerà. Bella serata!
3:15 That video also shows that the lens is terrible while zooming during video mode. The focus is all over the place, something that doesn't happen with other brands. Every recent Fuji lens (or apparently other brand lenses made for X-mount) behaves like this.
🤷🏻 probably because it’s made for photography not videos (my guess at this point). I use cine lenses most of the time for video but I guess in a run-and-gun typa situation it could work
@@cris_photography I can't even replicate that background with my FF 85. Another way to check is the shutter speed and ISO, they have to be the same as the other images.
The XT4 has a great IBIS plus the VR of the Tamron lens I believe the combo will be good. Not the lightest though (it’s a zoom lens and you’ll want to keep the lens at 18mm for vlogging)
@@cris_photography yes sorry your right a new 18-120mm by Fuji will be announced very soon!!! And the tamron definitely looks great but the tamron I believe is a lens that can be used only on a bright sunny day only especially at the longer focal length as it’s aperture doesn’t let much light in
@@Snapit551 Well there are no details about the Fuji 18-120 lens yet, hopefully it does come out this year. Yes obviously the Tamron is not a "fast" lens but it's a great all in one option. It can also be used at night if you know how. Mine should be arriving very soon, hopefully tomorrow!
Nice Amit! Yes it is great for all purposes. Would not trade my 18 and 56 for weddings but hey, if you need all those focal lengths in one lens it’s per-fect! 😀 Take care
@@amitchandra2179 that’s great news about your lens arriving tomorrow and I look forward to more videos about it and then I can make up my mind if I need to buy it too!! Keep the video’s coming as they are absolutely a joy to watch 👌📸
Ok I got this lens today. It will not be the most sharpest lens but sharpness is better than I expected. I actually never buy super zooms, mostly primes. But hauling with a bag full of lenses is not a picknick either. With good light and ISO at 800 the shutter speeds are high enough. Even at F8. Great adition to my Fujifilm gear.
I own one of these lenses, used it almost exclusively on my last vacation. I think its flexibility is its strength. I was on a safari at the end of the trip and the lens made it easy to capture photos of animals from a distance.
Great example of use for this lens!
XT-5 user here for the last year. I have been shooting Nikkor glass via a Fringer. Great stuff, but while my NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR is a FINE lens, combined with the Fringer is a heavy, unbalanced beast. An awesome looking one for sure, but tiring when working street and events.
This is my first native X fit lens, and MPB just sent me one that was in the OEM box and that I could not tell a difference from unboxing new. It's as light as my beloved NIKKOR 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR (actually a bit less without the Fringer) and is balanced perfectly.
Sleek (almost too much so) and the focus is instant! The zoom ring is a bit stiff, but that's OK as I sure won't worry about lens creep. And a very big surprise for me (something that no one seems to mention) is that at a full 300mm extension, there is ZERO wiggle or slop!
You are right about the construction feel. Metal has its own aura--but all plastics are not created equally. I feel the plastic--but it has a nice dense, solid, well-made feel. Not as substantial as the substance of metal barrels, but a hell of a lot lighter to tote around!
I think that this one is a keeper...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experience - much appreciated! Take care
I recently bought one of these in Sony emount. I have several fast prime lenses that I use for specific shooting situations. But, the 18-300 is on my camera all the time. It's an excellent all around lens that works well for just about any impromptu shooting situation I find myself in. A very useful lens and well worth the price.
Can’t agree more with you! Thanks for your feedback!
I own the Fujifilm X-T5, the Fujinon 10-24mm f4, also the 23mm f2, the Fujinon 35mm f1.4 (legend) and the 18-200mm from Tamron. All are really decent lenses for different needs but the Tamron is simply just a weapon when you don't know what's gonna happen and you wanna be prepared for all kinds of shots. ;-) I love it although I use mostly the 23mm and the 10-24mm as I do street and travel photography mostly. But when I'm a a zoo for example the 17-300 is just a no brainer.
Well said!
I'm considering this for Urbex photography. A lot of places I go have limits as to where I can physically go without putting myself in danger, so a higher zoom will help with that. And not having to change the lens in dusty, dirty environments is a massive added bonus.
Hello Nina, didn't think about Urbex for this lens but it would make sense in fact! I think you could for for it ;) cheers
Ok I got this lens today. It will not be the most sharpest lens but sharpness is better than I expected. I actually never buy super zooms, mostly primes. But hauling with a bag full of lenses is not a picknick either. With good light and ISO at 800 the shutter speeds are high enough. Even at F8. Great adition to my Fujifilm gear.
Absolutely! Enjoy your new lens!!
The best review by far because your video contains sample footage. Nice work
Thanks a lot - much appreciated
I think it's a great lens for landscape photographer because you don't need wide open ap. like 1.8 - 2.8. You need f8 and more usually (f11, f16). So if you connect old body like X-T3 with this lens on a tripod - you'll achieve great results!
Absolutely! Good point 😉
Closing aperture beyond f8 will make your images look softer btw
@traffbros no it won’t. Why’d you say that? I very often shoot between f9 and f11 and not a problem with softness. Did you experience issues with this lens?
@@cris_photography lower megapixel cams won't be as affected as higher megapixel ones, but on aps-c diffraction starts to kick in at around f8-f-11. Have a look
could you please compare video for Tamron 18-300 to Fuji 70-300? would like to know how these two compare with respect to image sharpness, image stabilization etc
Hello there, sure 👌🏼
Thank you for all of the great information. I'm purchasing the Fijifilm XT-5 along with this lens. For me, it will be a great all around combo.
Awesome!
The xt5 is a sweet camera dude.
he Fujifilm XF 70-300 is a better choice then the Tamron 18-300
If all you want to do is carry around 1 lens to cover most shooting situations this lens is a no brainer. Reasonably sharp and affordable.
Absolutely!
I have one since a month. I appreciate its flexibility, ideal for travel photography, photo walks ,... Pictures quality is good, AF is quite decent considering Fuji in general. So I think it is perfect for one lens, outdoor activities, vacation etc
Totally 👌🏼
The example photos of the 90mm definitely aren’t both at F5… The bokeh difference is way too drastic. I think you accidentally posted the 90mm image at f2
I was thinking the same
Very possible, I'd have to go check the EXIF but am sure it is not 5.6 indeed (was a while back so not sure). Cheers
Hi Cris! Thank you very much for doing a great review on the Tamron 18-300! You just sold one! I just purchased an XT3, and have been looking for a lens just like this for it. When I used to shoot a Nikon D70s, I had Tamrons 18-200, and absolutely loved it. I expect I'll love this one the same.
Hello there, thanks for your message - happy it was helpful to you!
Awesome video. Can you perhaps make a comparison video between the 18-300 and Fuji 70-300 within that same focal range just to compare the two🙌🏻🙌🏻
Thanks Arno! I had thought about that and might do one soon 😁 take care!
If you can buy only one, which one would you go for? 18-300 vs 70-300?
hot dog. power of the crop sensor lens! that's impressive range
It is indeed!
Just ordered this lens and having switched from Olympus, Nikon and, here it comes, Leica Q2 ( ?!? ) the reason I ordered it was as you say in the video, to try out what I prefer in focus length. What do I like? In my life, how do I shoot? What is it that I need? My oh my, I've got grandchildren now…
Now, you might say having owned a host of cameras and lenses, shot more pics than I care to count, I should know what style, what preferences, what feel in a picture I want. Not to mention that I sold my Leica Q2 due to the fact that I found myself trapped in the focus length. I know, I know, but that's a personal experience and you know… it just wasn't me, was it? But my god, what a camera! Jeeezus…
So having just switched to Fuji X-T4, I have to reinvent myself. And this is a lens that lets me explore what I want from a lens and what focus length I use. Or tend to use. To be creative. To find that childish, youthful kid in me that lent my dads camera to just play with… and now and again actually got a decent picture doing it.
( And for all of you out there that's focusing on tech, “searching for sugerman” was partially shot with an iPhone. It went and got an Oscar. And more photographers than just Todd Hido uses one now and then. So have fun! Just shoot some pictures 😉 )
Thanks! Great perspective and in totally see what you mean - can tell you’ve been taking photos for a while 😌 hope this lens will help you reinvent yourself and find the youthful kid in you - when photography achieves that no mater the gear used, it has accomplished its purpose imho. Take care and thanks for what gin the video
Well produced and very informative for a beginner considering whether to get more into photography. Thanks!
Glad it was helpful to you! Cheers
I think there is a mistake at 4:01. I think you accidentally inserted a picture from the 90mm fuji wide open. It does not make sense for them to be so different.
Hello, no, i triple checked the EXIF and it is the same aperture. It’s a 90mm so am not that shocked to be honest. But yes, the difference is insane! Cheers
@@cris_photography Thanks for checking. That is super surprising. Does the 90mm focus breaths like crazy? I see the camera in the picture is bigger from the Fuji lens. So in reality at this distance the 90mm is more like 120mm? Also, were the exposures the same (same ISO, shutter speed?). Other possibility is that the Tamron is not truly a f/5 at 90mm.
Noticed this as well. There should be little difference in DoF providing same focal length and aperture settings. Appreciate the video either way I have the 70-300mm but the 18-300 would be an alternative or better choice depending on use case.
I have both lenses and at 90mm f/5 the bokeh looks very similar (bit more harmonic on the prime) so never as far off as in the video...
Thanks Cris! I travel with a 3 lens setup, so this is probably not ending up in my kit. I would travel with a 23 f/1.4 or 35 f/1.4 lens, a Sigma 18-50 2.8 Zoom, and either the Fuji 55-200 or 70-300 lens (mostly the Fuji for its faster aperture). At the moment I have the Fuji 18-55 and 35 mm f/2, and looking at the Fuji 55-200 to complete my travel kit :)
Nice! 😏
i have the 18 55 too and i want to upgrade, but i think i will buy the fuji 70-300 mm
just purchased one and really pleased to have such a range
Awesome 😉
Great Video. I prefer 18-55 + 70-300.
Thanks 👍🏼
Teacher, may I ask, I currently use x-t4, the lenses are xf16, xf56, xf70-300, I am sure to buy tamron 150-500mm, but I also like tamron 17-70 and tamron 18-300, if it is you , tamron 17-70, tamron 18-300, xf70-300, these three lenses, choose two or one, how would you choose, can you give me a reference??? Thank you
Hi there, thanks for your message.
It very much depends on what you want to do with your lenses and the type of photography. The 17-70 has a better aperture throughout but the 18-300 is much more versatile in well lit environments. The 70-300 is a very nice and well made lens but if you need to go wider you’ll have a problem. You need to decide if you a) need a wider aperture and b) what type of framing you’ll need to have and if you need wider than 70mm. Hope that helps take care
I just ordered this lens Used for 499-00 US.. Sadly I saw your review after I pulled the trigger. Let's see how I like it... I think I may go for the Xf 50-140 just spend the money not as much reach but Quality. Im shooting Xpro2 and Xt4.. Will let you know.
Ok! Yes please keep me posted on your findings and how you like this lens personally
I like it. I was surprised. Sharp enough, compact, well built, Pairs nicely with My Xt4... Ok no aperture ring but not a deal breaker.
I do photography for youth camps and this is absolutely perfect!!! Don't have time to switch lenses there.
Thats a gréât use of this lens indeed!
Tamaron 18-300mm Fuji or XC 50-230mm ois 2 which lens produce better image quality?
Excellent question. Unfortunately I have t tested the 50-230mm so can’t tell you. However and that been said, i would tho l the Fuji lens might be a tad sharper (as for most of my Fuji prime lenses) but that is not a tested opinion. Might do a video comparing the 2 - why not.
Take care
I would personally get the XC 50-230mm. This is my favorite. Even I have the 70-300mm.
18-300mm becomes out of focus and extremely blurry. 50-230mm is surprisingly not like that even if it is varifocal. The IOS is even better with the 50-230mm than the Tamrons. The only downside of the XC 50-230 is the plastic mount. While the Tamron 18-300 has a versatile range. Good for vacation and minimalist. But quality wise overall, video and photos, I would NOT get the Tamron.
As for sharpness, Tamron lack in this area as well. For quality photos, I would not go for the 18-300mm. But for vacation, fast and light travel, 18-300mm is good if you dont care about photo quality.
7:00 nice photo
Crazy right?
In my Tamron 18-300 zoom works hard.
Follow focus doesn't want to run smoothly.
Jumps on gears.
Is it just my lens acting this way?
Regards.
Did you try putting a ring for the focus pulling? This is not a lens made for video originally so you will have to use a ring that will allow you to use it with a focus pulling system.
@@cris_photography Of course, but when rotating the follow focus, the camera goes up. I'm talking about zooming. The focus ring works perfectly.
Thx for making this review! The lens seems really nice. How does it compare to the Fujinon XF18-135mm? Currently deciding which one to get (mainly vacation photography) ;)
Thanks. Well you really do gain the extra length (up to 300mm vs 135mm). They are very similar to be honest but I’d root for Fujifilm in terms of image quality (due to the size and versatility of the Tamron lens) but for an « all in one » type of lens I’d take Tamron. Hope that helps. Take care
@@cris_photography thx so much for your opinion!
the only downside for me is that i cant change the diafragma myself , and that it automatically changes light for you . Is there any way i can fix that ?
What you mean? You can’t change the aperture?
U mean when you zoom?
Hey, can you make a Video Tamron 18-300 vs Fuji 70-300? :) Greetings from Germany
Hey there, sure! I put it in my future videos list 😊 take care!
I use it to walk my dogs and do random captures as lens changes with pooches are too hard
Makes sense Adam
Which do you prefer between this lens and fuji xf18-135 ? I am considering about the lighter weight and the more focal length which is more useable for me.
Hello there. Honestly it really depends on your needs. I like fuji better for the quality of the lens but the Tamron lens is very good too for the price and it really is very versatile. Cheers
@@cris_photography thanks for the replying!
good review
Thanks
$1,000.000 Question: Can I use the "70-300mm XF 1.4x TC WR Teleconverter" -- with the TAMRON 18-300MM?
Hey there - great question!
Did not try that BUT I am pretty sure you can! No reason not to
Great video thanks.
Glad it could be of some help 😊
im a beginner, would you recommend this or the Fuji xf 55-200mm. I want to try out a bit of wildlife, architectural and landscape photography?
Hello, no, for landscape and architecture 55mm is too narrow. I’d take this one which also gives you more zooming possibilities for wildlife. Cheers
Have a look at Fujinon XF 18-135mm. If you want a first party lens.
@@philipcooper8297 Thanks!
@@jexbuddy There's also supposed to be a XF 18-120mm coming out soon.
If the aperture is set at f6.3 and you zoom in video, will there be exposure stepping?
If you’re set to 6.3 there won’t be any change. However if you’re set to a lower aperture and you zoom, the aperture will vary as you zoom in (since it can’t open as much when it’s zoomed in)
@@cris_photography Oh ok. Reason I'm asking is cos the Fuji 2.8 and f4 zooms have a bad exposure stepping when zooming in video. If the Tamron doesnt have that issue then I'll be hopeful about the tamron 17-70 coming to x mount
Thank you for the video! Does the zoom lock only work to keep it at 18mm, or can it be activated to keep it fixed at 50mm, for example? I ask this because a Canon lens I had only locked at the shortest focal distance, and when taking pictures pointing downwards, the zoom would automatically increase. It was terrible.
Thanks. It only locks at 18 (for transportation purposes really). Cheers
The only reason I don't get this lens, is the os ...I tried it in my xt4 and it was not good at all, especially on longer focal lengths.
Y’a that can be an issue indeed for some
I’ll have to test that
Ne sono interessato,perché è un tutto . Anche se utilizzo molte lenti Vintage
Ciao Duilio, ti capisco! È stato una bella sorpreso quando l’ho provato, non mi aspettavo una qualità d’immagine così alta. Se ne hai l’occasione, provalo, penso che ti piacerà. Bella serata!
Is this lens sharp at 300 focal?
Hello, yes it is (based on personal tests). Take care
@@cris_photography Damn. I just bought the 70-200 fuji.. I would have bought this if I knew tamrom would release this. Thanks anyway
Oh no! Well that 70-200 is sharper in my opinion if that can make you feel better 😊 enjoy it!!
3:15 That video also shows that the lens is terrible while zooming during video mode. The focus is all over the place, something that doesn't happen with other brands. Every recent Fuji lens (or apparently other brand lenses made for X-mount) behaves like this.
🤷🏻 probably because it’s made for photography not videos (my guess at this point). I use cine lenses most of the time for video but I guess in a run-and-gun typa situation it could work
@@cris_photography But Fuji is the only one to show this behaviour. The other brands also produce lenses mainly for photography. What's Fuji excuse?
that 90mm shot can't be f5 with that background. It's probably locked at f2.
I triple checked - it was. Dunno what to say 🤷🏻
@@cris_photography I can't even replicate that background with my FF 85. Another way to check is the shutter speed and ISO, they have to be the same as the other images.
Nice review. 👍👍
Thanks Sean
Ummm, you are the only one that gave this lens a good review and the Fuji 70-300mm a bad...
Yup, cause I say what I think - and that’s what I think
Make a walking vl9g
That’s a good idea! It’s be VERY shaky tho as I don’t have a Fuji camera that has IBIS 😬
@@cris_photography Thats is the point I want to use this 18-300mm with X-E4, Want to see how good is the OIS for walking!
The XT4 has a great IBIS plus the VR of the Tamron lens I believe the combo will be good. Not the lightest though (it’s a zoom lens and you’ll want to keep the lens at 18mm for vlogging)
1:21 LOL
Glad you laughed 🤷🏻🫠
Fujifilm is also making the same lens but with better image quality
No they don’t. 18-135 or 70-300. A 18-120 is expected this year too. Where did you see a Fujinon 18-300? Am VERY curious!
@@cris_photography yes sorry your right a new 18-120mm by Fuji will be announced very soon!!! And the tamron definitely looks great but the tamron I believe is a lens that can be used only on a bright sunny day only especially at the longer focal length as it’s aperture doesn’t let much light in
@@Snapit551 Well there are no details about the Fuji 18-120 lens yet, hopefully it does come out this year. Yes obviously the Tamron is not a "fast" lens but it's a great all in one option. It can also be used at night if you know how. Mine should be arriving very soon, hopefully tomorrow!
Nice Amit! Yes it is great for all purposes. Would not trade my 18 and 56 for weddings but hey, if you need all those focal lengths in one lens it’s per-fect! 😀
Take care
@@amitchandra2179 that’s great news about your lens arriving tomorrow and I look forward to more videos about it and then I can make up my mind if I need to buy it too!! Keep the video’s coming as they are absolutely a joy to watch 👌📸
As you can see what? This was the worst comparison of lenses I have witnessed on youtube.
Thanks!
Ok I got this lens today. It will not be the most sharpest lens but sharpness is better than I expected. I actually never buy super zooms, mostly primes. But hauling with a bag full of lenses is not a picknick either. With good light and ISO at 800 the shutter speeds are high enough. Even at F8. Great adition to my Fujifilm gear.
I think this comment is double
@@cris_photography you are right. Stupid Samsung phone😡
Don’t worry 😉 I answer all my comments that’s why. Hope my previous reply was helpful to you - take care!