Sensitivity and Specificity Explained Clearly (Biostatistics)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 125

  • @kirstenroche8160
    @kirstenroche8160 3 роки тому +36

    I have tried to learn this concept about 100 times in medical school. It never made sense to me. Your one short video talking about cars has somehow completely driven this concept into my mind! Thank you SO MUCH!

  • @MuhammadJunaidAshraf
    @MuhammadJunaidAshraf 4 роки тому +4

    I have an exam in a week and I couldn't understand the the SPIN and SNOUT thing so I searched Sensitivity and specificity explained intuitively and this came up. Not disappointed, it explained so much. Thank you.

  • @cili5724
    @cili5724 4 роки тому +8

    OH MY GOSH this actually makes sense finally! As I write boards, here I am
    Once again trying to learn this! Thank you! You’ve done it!

  • @ORagnar
    @ORagnar 4 роки тому

    Thanks for this video from 6 years ago. What makes this concept clear is to realize that there is noise you're trying to contend with.

  • @alphavirginis260
    @alphavirginis260 6 років тому +4

    This is, by far, the best explanation of Sensitivity and Specificity! Thank you!

  • @pcookieness
    @pcookieness 8 років тому +8

    Speaking my language, you used the perfect examples and methods to teach this!

  • @toddmason1865
    @toddmason1865 9 років тому

    Excellent video from an excellent physician. I worked with Dr. Seheult for several years and I can say he definitely knows his stuff and has a great voice and ability to explain clearly, no doubt. Thank you doctor it helped immensely.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      Todd Mason Thank you Todd, great to hear from you

  • @jcleach2764
    @jcleach2764 2 роки тому

    This was by FAR the best breakdown and explanation I've come across. Thank you!!

  • @SubhabrataMoitra
    @SubhabrataMoitra 7 років тому +23

    Brilliant explanation. Could you make a video on sensitivity and specificity with a real-time example? A drug-disease interaction would be great.

  • @annetteasbury7415
    @annetteasbury7415 10 років тому +1

    Wow, you made it so much easier to understand than our professor. Great use of the analogy of the car alarm. Thank you!

  • @brianjackson4177
    @brianjackson4177 7 років тому +1

    All of your videos are great. They are concise, well planned, and effectively communicate the concepts! Thank You!

  • @radwaandjama923
    @radwaandjama923 4 роки тому +3

    You sir are an absolute legend. Couldn't't have explained it any better. Thank you!!

  • @mateuszkaczmarek9848
    @mateuszkaczmarek9848 3 роки тому

    Best video on sensitivity and specificity, great job!

  • @salam7905
    @salam7905 3 роки тому

    that car example has clarified everything I was confused about .. thank you so much ^-^

  • @burakORAKC
    @burakORAKC 10 років тому +8

    this was fab thank you so much. Your title is just what I found in the video "EXPLAIND CLEAR" meaning we have a true-positive (TP) :D

  • @nothodube3698
    @nothodube3698 Рік тому

    Great stuff. Simplified👌

  • @ankursatya4733
    @ankursatya4733 8 років тому +1

    Quite explanatory and the car example was chosen "specifically".

  • @badr985
    @badr985 10 років тому +7

    where is the second video for the mathematical interpretation part ?

  • @pohsstudio7769
    @pohsstudio7769 10 років тому

    Great analogy with the car, makes it so much more simpler!

  • @DeepBlueMuslim
    @DeepBlueMuslim 9 років тому

    Thank you, simple explanation for what is a relatively difficult concept. Think i struggled due to my understanding of the words 'specific' and 'sensitive'

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому

      +Omer Elhassan Thank you for the feedback

  • @helenhayes3298
    @helenhayes3298 2 роки тому

    What is the next video called please? I can't find it

  • @Gossypol
    @Gossypol 2 роки тому +1

    I have understood 50% of the video. But after 6:21 the next part was a bit confusing for me. Still for the 50% a thank you won’t be enough. But still thank you very much. 🤚

  • @00bean00
    @00bean00 3 роки тому +2

    The interpretation I made:
    Spec. is the number (or %) of negative cases it _accurately_ rules out. (Negatives)
    Sens. is the number (or %) of cases it accurately _identifies_ . (Positives)
    Thus, for any given test there will be a gap (or %), which is the number of cases that cannot be accurately known, or, are _unknowable_ (as FP or FN).

  • @AjaySharma-pg9cp
    @AjaySharma-pg9cp 7 років тому +2

    Explanation provided is quite good

  • @bodybalanceanneloes9666
    @bodybalanceanneloes9666 Рік тому

    Thank you for this great explanation!

  • @cortis77
    @cortis77 10 років тому

    This is the best video I could find explaining sensitivity and specificity clearly, THANK YOU!

  • @MrKoolguy9
    @MrKoolguy9 8 років тому

    Excellent explanation with lucid examples ... awesome !!!

  • @bobolob
    @bobolob 9 років тому +3

    Helpful, but when you got to the bell curves, it was hard to visualize TP/FP and TN/FN because you didn't actually label them under the curves. If that makes any sense. You filled the spaces in, just no labels.

    • @DreamEclipse
      @DreamEclipse 5 років тому

      That's because it's very hard, he would have to draw it three times. But for reference, if the test is equally sensitive and specific (point B), the half of the curve on the left is the TN, the half of the curve on the right is the TP, and the bisecting part in the middle from left to right is the FN and FP.

  • @Bekah07
    @Bekah07 10 років тому

    This is fantastic.. thanks so much. When is the next video in the series going up?

  • @kikithepupper6774
    @kikithepupper6774 Місяць тому

    9:35 Im sorry I am dumb. If there is very low false positive rates, doesnt that mean youre very sensitive, instead of specifc? This confuses me so much

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  Місяць тому

      A low false positive rate means that it will only be positive when it’s true, which makes it very specific

    • @kikithepupper6774
      @kikithepupper6774 Місяць тому

      @Medcram Ohh I thought of the opposite, thank you

  • @otacon3d
    @otacon3d 10 років тому +28

    At the end of the video it says there's a "next video"
    Still waiting on a part 2, will it still come? Also can you explain positive and negative predictive values?

    • @FlyingFlaneur
      @FlyingFlaneur 4 роки тому +1

      They released another one. ua-cam.com/video/ZPc6_UkdtzU/v-deo.html

  • @amirrezaeterafi3959
    @amirrezaeterafi3959 Рік тому

    Fantastic! thank you sir

  • @為主作工
    @為主作工 9 років тому +3

    Yes, it's really clear in explanation. Thank you so much!!

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  9 років тому +1

      為主作工 good to hear- thank you

  • @saileshbalanagu7530
    @saileshbalanagu7530 7 років тому +1

    Thank you so much! Its very clear now.

  • @moe1n
    @moe1n 9 років тому

    Excellent. after many years I got my answer. Thank you .

  • @Eric-sq4hd
    @Eric-sq4hd Рік тому

    we need this for npv. and ppv too

  • @jakirhossain8409
    @jakirhossain8409 10 років тому +3

    a lot of thanks
    you make the things so easy

  • @pammyholisticmed
    @pammyholisticmed 7 років тому

    I appreciate the misspelling... I'm not alone! Evil e-i combos. THANK YOU for this video...

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  7 років тому

      +Pam deWilde Thanks for the comment, but what is the misspelling are you referring to?

    • @pammyholisticmed
      @pammyholisticmed 7 років тому

      MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY : Forgive me, I meant to reply to the comment below. At minute 2:50ish, the word "Thief" is misspelled. The last person to comment made mention of it, or I wouldn't have noticed. This video was very helpful, truly.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  7 років тому

      +Pam deWilde No problem at all, thanks for letting us know, and apologies for the misspelling!

  • @AbdullahMQ
    @AbdullahMQ 9 років тому +1

    Great video, but does any one tell me where is the following part about the mathematical part?

  • @leezanewill-cordington8395
    @leezanewill-cordington8395 4 роки тому

    What is and why do tests have a "pre-setting"? 🤔. Take the covid-19 testing, could it be that the prerequisite for identifying the virus is highly similar to other viruses, thus giving false positives?

  • @nnp418
    @nnp418 8 років тому

    Hi, I am confused about the cutoff point for most of the true positives, the highest positive predictive value, the lowest negative predictive value and the highest specificity on graph. At what point, I get most of the true positives and at what point I get the highest specificity. I hope someone clarifies these. I would be much more appreciated.

  • @nichols44nancy
    @nichols44nancy 10 років тому +1

    great video...hope you will go on to part 2 :)

  • @DrMilanii
    @DrMilanii 10 років тому

    Great video! Can you please explain IV fluids in clinical practice? Thanks a lot

  • @saraamin8154
    @saraamin8154 10 років тому

    Thank you :) ! You always have wonderful explanations.

  • @narjesseghatoleslam5307
    @narjesseghatoleslam5307 7 років тому

    Dear Dr. Seheult,
    I did two different test for detection of a bacteria in the same population. Is it possible to calculate PPV, NPV, Sensitivity and Specificity of each test Separately with out gold standard ? Could you guide me please. Thank you for your consideration and confirmation would be appreciated.
    Sincerely,
    Narjes

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  7 років тому

      +Narjes Seghatoleslam in order to calculate Ppv and npv you need to have accurate info on disease. This requires a gold standard.

    • @narjesseghatoleslam5307
      @narjesseghatoleslam5307 7 років тому

      Dear Dr. Seheult, thanks a lot for response, it is very nice of you.

  • @Mrseabase1
    @Mrseabase1 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for the video. It was helpful.

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  8 років тому

      Glad it was helpful - thanks for the comment

  • @kayaksta
    @kayaksta 11 років тому

    excellent Roger!

  • @b.kwanmin3367
    @b.kwanmin3367 6 років тому +1

    This is brilliant !

  • @tomtong9859
    @tomtong9859 10 років тому

    Brilliant video!

  • @PiyD2537
    @PiyD2537 10 років тому

    Very Well Explained...!

  • @petesburgher
    @petesburgher 6 років тому +1

    thanks for the explanation ... I get it now!

  • @nazmaahmed1544
    @nazmaahmed1544 8 років тому +1

    Really helpful. Thank you

  • @bhaskergowda2203
    @bhaskergowda2203 6 років тому

    Could any one solve my problem or come a cross this problem pls let me know
    I have got trigenomial neuralgia from 17 yrs and I have been taking tegretol for all these years now lately l have developed sensitivitiness in leg and arm l cannot touch cold or hot water cannot walk longer pls help

  • @terigopula
    @terigopula 6 років тому

    That was a nice explanation. Cheers! :)

  • @miladchenaghlou5278
    @miladchenaghlou5278 9 років тому +1

    Excellent !!!

  • @chiragmehta2955
    @chiragmehta2955 4 роки тому

    If population is on y axis,What is on x axis?

  • @reneeshortz3404
    @reneeshortz3404 7 років тому

    still a bit hard to grasp but I think I'm on the right track now!!

  • @AballVR6
    @AballVR6 10 років тому +1

    I love your lectures!!! Could you do one on neuro?

  • @Eric-sq4hd
    @Eric-sq4hd Рік тому

    finally makes sense. wow..

  • @Med.School.Wizards
    @Med.School.Wizards 8 років тому

    Great presentation :)

  • @niharikadharmapuri8343
    @niharikadharmapuri8343 6 років тому +1

    well explained! thanks

  • @naghmeazadi8294
    @naghmeazadi8294 8 років тому

    Great as ussual.Thanks

  • @AK.ALMAHASNEH
    @AK.ALMAHASNEH 2 роки тому

    thank u so much bro God bless you

  • @Princesscamiii
    @Princesscamiii 5 років тому +1

    I love you! I will always refer to disease as "thief" and test to "alarm". hehe

  • @R0V3Rvids
    @R0V3Rvids 10 років тому

    Cool bro! Great job!

  • @neard89
    @neard89 10 років тому

    please upload next one...

  • @oodon3220
    @oodon3220 4 роки тому +1

    thank you!

  • @ioannisdikeoulias
    @ioannisdikeoulias 6 років тому

    Specificity = TNR and Sensitivity = TPR...you mixed something up at your explanations 9:48 ...still good video!

  • @mechanizatorius
    @mechanizatorius 9 років тому +2

    next video??

  • @FaisalYami
    @FaisalYami 9 років тому +1

    really good !!!

  • @ednamayseymour2053
    @ednamayseymour2053 6 років тому +1

    THANK YOU!!!!

  • @zarsblackhorse123
    @zarsblackhorse123 2 роки тому

    Thank you.

  • @vdp5837
    @vdp5837 7 років тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @syedwraza6184
    @syedwraza6184 3 роки тому

    Great simple easy

  • @arnabsaha3006
    @arnabsaha3006 10 років тому

    excellent...

  • @rayanhasnat2140
    @rayanhasnat2140 4 роки тому +1

    I think, sensitivity= TN/ TN+FN
    And specificity= TP/ TP+FP

  • @misanteojos5934
    @misanteojos5934 8 років тому +2

    Thanks for the video its awesome, the car example is genius! but theif!!! makes my eyes hurt! hahaha

  • @hlulanisambo1933
    @hlulanisambo1933 6 років тому +1

    Thanks

  • @Runcible2010
    @Runcible2010 6 років тому

    Because of the epidemiological fallacy, test sensitivity should be high regardless of any demographic factors.

  • @Stonefalconetti
    @Stonefalconetti 10 років тому +6

    Thief written "theif" and you are obviously a Native English speaker.. Yes, you really must be a very good doctor!!! ( No sarcasm. It's true. :))

  • @boyuanchen4997
    @boyuanchen4997 5 років тому

    Came here from Jeff Heaton's Machine Learning course :)

  • @johnweir1217
    @johnweir1217 4 роки тому

    Really good but I before e except after c. 😄

  • @Olu_Segun
    @Olu_Segun 5 років тому

    Brilliant

  • @imeann...
    @imeann... 2 роки тому

    6:00

  • @bhupensinha3767
    @bhupensinha3767 6 років тому

    FP and FN aren't correctly put .. interchange em...

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  6 років тому +1

      +Bhupen Sinha false positives are people who don’t have disease but test positive. They go in the right column and top row by definition. False negatives are people who have disease but test negative. They go in the left column bottom row by definition.

  • @khankhan-cw2bq
    @khankhan-cw2bq 5 років тому

    Dont understand car eg make it more difficult...

  • @joshuahornick3221
    @joshuahornick3221 5 років тому +1

    "Thief", not "Theif." Still, very clear. Thank you.

  • @janicebaker3499
    @janicebaker3499 8 років тому +30

    Spell thief correctly please

    • @joeymatee
      @joeymatee 8 років тому +2

      lmaooo

    • @Medcram
      @Medcram  8 років тому +17

      +janice baker yeah I know. "Thief" there!

    • @carog4969
      @carog4969 7 років тому +1

      Get out of here

    • @ryezizzle
      @ryezizzle 6 років тому +2

      unwatchable video! jkjk!

  • @dr.ghaith
    @dr.ghaith 10 років тому

    great thanx

  • @daradangana5625
    @daradangana5625 2 роки тому

    Thankssss

  • @كهعص
    @كهعص 7 років тому

    High
    Sensitivity low specificty

  • @dr.osmanelamin77
    @dr.osmanelamin77 11 років тому

    Great :) Thanks alot

  • @Yazan-Baki
    @Yazan-Baki 2 роки тому

    Greeeeeeat

  • @monicaherrera-rickman3704
    @monicaherrera-rickman3704 7 років тому

    👌🏻👌🏻🙌🏼🙌🏼👏👏

  • @themossman77
    @themossman77 4 роки тому +1

    Thief not theif....👌

  • @swngstr
    @swngstr 6 років тому

    What’s a boombox? Ha ha jk.

  • @LD-pt5ur
    @LD-pt5ur 3 роки тому

    I like your tutorial. I hate the car alarm example.

  • @awolf81
    @awolf81 4 роки тому

    “I don’t get it” *twirls long blonde hair with index finger*

  • @leezanewill-cordington8395
    @leezanewill-cordington8395 4 роки тому

    "Thief"

  • @Bj0rken1984
    @Bj0rken1984 10 років тому

    Thief ;)