“Cancel Culture Is Unproductive!” Waterstones Sacks Influencer Who Hit Out At Gender-Critical Author

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
  • Waterstones has sacked a book influencer who said she’d enjoy ‘tearing up’ a gender-critical author’s work.
    Talk’s Kevin O’Sullivan discusses the story with free speech advocate Lois McLatchie Miller.
    Click here for more from Talk talk.tv
    If you need any help visit: talk.tv/helplines
    #cancelculture #culturewars #gender

КОМЕНТАРІ • 207

  • @maxi.7011
    @maxi.7011 28 днів тому +95

    Please stop calling them trans “women”, they are NOT women!

    • @pickleperryemz
      @pickleperryemz 28 днів тому +9

      They also need to stop calling illiberal people liberals.

    • @amyleeming245
      @amyleeming245 27 днів тому

      Trans women are women

    • @wadtony123
      @wadtony123 27 днів тому

      Paraphilic men are men

    • @glastiger7598
      @glastiger7598 26 днів тому

      No, keep calling them transwomen because that is what they are (some of them). What they are not are women, I agree with you on that.

    • @amyleeming245
      @amyleeming245 26 днів тому

      @@glastiger7598 I'm a girl that wears nappies and pees myself, I'm wet right now

  • @phoebecaulfield4062
    @phoebecaulfield4062 28 днів тому +63

    The book seller cannot "love books" very much if she is posting about destroying them. No wonder Waterstones fired her. Her job is to SELL books, not to be a self-imposed censor, or to destroy books.

  • @marieparker3822
    @marieparker3822 28 днів тому +91

    Good for Waterstone's!!😄

  • @user-wt2rs2mm9n
    @user-wt2rs2mm9n 28 днів тому +50

    Well done Waterstones.

  • @martygough
    @martygough 28 днів тому +22

    This is not a free speech issue. They had a policy to protect their brand. This person threatened to burn and destroy books, she was threatening. The very fact she was fired with her views proves she was extreme as they are usually immune from it.

    • @mrgabagoo580
      @mrgabagoo580 25 днів тому

      Ah, so presumably you agree with the supermarket who sacked someone for sharing a Billy Connolly joke on Twitter? If so, fair enough. If not, it's hypocrisy. Believing in free speech means believing in free speech we agree with, but also believing in free speech for those we disagree with, find stupid and offensive.

  • @harrygraham5810
    @harrygraham5810 29 днів тому +63

    Remember compelled speech is Fascism and a breach of human rights

    • @spectre8788
      @spectre8788 28 днів тому

      @@harrygraham5810 it is - so why do the Left keep insisting on compelling other speech? Whilst crying that people who refuse are the facists.
      The left are totalitarian

    • @MrReubenTishkoff
      @MrReubenTishkoff 27 днів тому +1

      According to them it's progressivism now.

    • @harrygraham5810
      @harrygraham5810 27 днів тому +1

      @@MrReubenTishkoff what they really mean is regressivism

    • @MrReubenTishkoff
      @MrReubenTishkoff 27 днів тому

      @@harrygraham5810 they mean progressivism. Regressivism is what they _are_ ... 😉

    • @harrygraham5810
      @harrygraham5810 27 днів тому +1

      @@MrReubenTishkoff im still waiting for them to create trans animals of other species or ones that identify as non binary so they can show how its a normal thing we should all accept, instead of the truth of male and female only.

  • @JescaML
    @JescaML 28 днів тому +37

    Spoiled brats is what they are called

  • @spectre8788
    @spectre8788 29 днів тому +55

    Not the whole story is it? She threatened to burn books owned by waterstones

    • @marksavage1108
      @marksavage1108 29 днів тому

      Does that make any difference? did the nazi fascists only burn certain publishers' books?

    • @fabiennemitchell2371
      @fabiennemitchell2371 28 днів тому +2

      No, she was sacked for her social media posts in matters connected to her job, not for her opinions.

    • @spectre8788
      @spectre8788 28 днів тому +13

      @@fabiennemitchell2371 yes in which she said she was going to burn the books? That are the property of waterstones?

    • @barryevans791
      @barryevans791 28 днів тому +2

      @@fabiennemitchell2371 She wouldn't have been sacked for Tweeting that she loved bunnies would she?

    • @fabiennemitchell2371
      @fabiennemitchell2371 28 днів тому +1

      @@barryevans791
      Tilly Fitzgerald might have been sacked if the rule against social media posts was strictly applied to ensure that no staff members bought the company into disrepute or controversy on a present or future contentious matter. Such areas include, for example:
      - the social justice cultural wars (BLM, trans, race, DEI, the BBC and bias),
      - war (Ukraine & Russia, Israel & Hamas, China & Taiwan),
      - politics (the UK election and opinions as to which party is "racist", Trump v Biden) and so on.

  • @HarryFlashmanVC
    @HarryFlashmanVC 28 днів тому +22

    She breached her employment contract

  • @nielszindel1151
    @nielszindel1151 28 днів тому +21

    The most I want to hear from a person selling books is oh that is a good read and nothing else thanks. Destroying books is like burning art. Delia Morris

  • @megsley
    @megsley 29 днів тому +59

    oh, so we're finally punishing the gender zealots?

    • @unitysprings3631
      @unitysprings3631 29 днів тому +19

      I hope so.

    • @fabiennemitchell2371
      @fabiennemitchell2371 29 днів тому +9

      Tilly Fitzgerald was sacked for using social media on matters about her job, not because of her views.

    • @barryevans791
      @barryevans791 28 днів тому +1

      @@fabiennemitchell2371 Wrong again, how many times do you have to state the same thing?

    • @fabiennemitchell2371
      @fabiennemitchell2371 28 днів тому

      @@barryevans791
      Why am I wrong?

    • @nielszindel1151
      @nielszindel1151 28 днів тому +3

      @@fabiennemitchell2371 .. I think you are right, but I cannot speak for Waterstones. Their main purpose is to sell the books they order. Delia Morris

  • @leunisvandewege9651
    @leunisvandewege9651 29 днів тому +27

    That's what preoccupies me for years. There is so much agression in this "liberal" movement. If I don't agree with something, why the hell should I want to destroy it? I think you must be very frustrated and insecure for that.

    • @stevepowell491
      @stevepowell491 28 днів тому

      Please stop calling them liberals: They're socialists, the exact opposite of a Liberal.

    • @pickleperryemz
      @pickleperryemz 28 днів тому

      The liberals are illiberal, who would have thought.

  • @paulsharp2565
    @paulsharp2565 28 днів тому +12

    Concerning gender ideology, I was using the gender neutral toilet at my workplace yesterday and two things occurred to me. The first was that when we used to have a toilet purely for men, if I wanted to urinate, I could use a urinal rather than the current situation where I have to use a cubicle where a lot of the time I have to pull up a toilet seat which means increased contact and more germs. The second thing that struck me was that before shared toilets we didn't have the need for disposal bins for women's sanitary products in men's toilets. I know this is a necessary requirement for women and I'm not criticising, but why do men have to put up with this extra hygiene risk just for the sake of an ideology?

    • @davetdowell
      @davetdowell 28 днів тому +4

      Fairly sure the point of the hygiene bins is to contain the risk, so you weren't exposed to any extra risk, as long as you didn't go fucking around with the hygiene bin, did you? Tell us you didn't fuck around with the hygiene bin... please!

    • @OrwellsHousecat
      @OrwellsHousecat 28 днів тому

      Don't put the seat up.

    • @Michelle-iz5bh
      @Michelle-iz5bh 28 днів тому +3

      The toilets at the RSC now have female toilets (thank goodness) and the men’s is gender neutral. I enjoyed walking past recently to a huge queue for the “men’s” and all of them grumbling about the need to queue. I assume this is because they’d got rid of the urinals. If you have a penis and favour a dress I’m unsure how upsetting a urinal can be?!

    • @sumary7663
      @sumary7663 27 днів тому

      Gender neutral toilets are an abomination

    • @gug1970
      @gug1970 23 дні тому

      Shuuush.. Remember, you're a man. That means you don't have the right to comment on any of this.

  • @notabiologist9865
    @notabiologist9865 28 днів тому +12

    Seems like progress to me...Now get rid of Sensitivity Readers" in the Publishing Industry.

  • @user-yr5kl1iw3t
    @user-yr5kl1iw3t 28 днів тому +15

    Well done Waterstones if they did this for the right reason ie no woke ideology if so I’ll make it the place to buy books.

    • @phoebecaulfield4062
      @phoebecaulfield4062 28 днів тому +3

      They did it because they sell books and want to make a profit. Employing someone who does not want to sell books is rather contra their mission statement.

  • @simonclare-fu7sx
    @simonclare-fu7sx 29 днів тому +17

    she just had to be called Tilly😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 that's where arrogant intolerance gets you, maybe she needs to learn to have an open mind.....might help her to grow up and realise she can be wrong

    • @ruthcollins2841
      @ruthcollins2841 29 днів тому +2

      She can still read books from a library if she loved them so much!📚

  • @CB-dl1vg
    @CB-dl1vg 29 днів тому +15

    “Tilly” thick skinned, down to earth working class girl I assume 🤔

  • @historex54tamiya
    @historex54tamiya 28 днів тому +19

    The first thing I was ever taught by my dear departed dad was to look after a book. All books whether reference, historical or fiction, and at 52 I do to this day. Wash hands, don’t break the spine and respect what is written.

    • @rachellandry3116
      @rachellandry3116 28 днів тому +2

      not all books deserve respect. It depends on what's between the cover... acompendium of Penthouse, gold gilt edges and bound in fine-grained leather.. is still penthouse...
      its only print in page.. respect? nah.

    • @BobSmith-vo9hv
      @BobSmith-vo9hv 28 днів тому +1

      As a student I creased the front cover of my Riverside Chaucer through injudicious handling. I went inconsolably until opening time.

    • @souxcasa
      @souxcasa 28 днів тому +3

      ​@@rachellandry3116 all books deserve respect even if the content doesn't. You have no idea which ones will survive time and give us a glimpse into the past for an accurate view of the good and the bad even if that's 'mein kampf' or Wordsworth's poetry about grief, clouds and daffodils

    • @historex54tamiya
      @historex54tamiya 27 днів тому

      @@rachellandry3116 Showing your Neanderthal traits nicely!

  • @AJ-zr5ls
    @AJ-zr5ls 26 днів тому +2

    She literally said she’d tear up books that she doesn’t agree with. How can a bookstore keep her employed after that? The victim narrative is getting exhausting!

  • @jayWalk8
    @jayWalk8 27 днів тому +2

    She could have just ignored & not reviewed the books. Anyone who loves books WILL NOT EVER tear up a book & bin them.
    Waterstones are 💯 within their rights to terminate her employment.

  • @chrismattravers5434
    @chrismattravers5434 28 днів тому +2

    I like Waterstones... now I love them! Well done Waterstones!

  • @maggielucas8685
    @maggielucas8685 28 днів тому +18

    Biological women are women. Transmen are transmen not women. Good for Waterstones.

    • @judyparsons1333
      @judyparsons1333 27 днів тому

      She needs to take them to a tribunal

    • @oliverjones5350
      @oliverjones5350 15 днів тому

      @@judyparsons1333 I don't think she'd get very far. Waterstones HR will be air tight, the dismissal will have been done by the book. Good for them.

  • @Nicole-Faith
    @Nicole-Faith 29 днів тому +23

    Silly Billy Tilly was not quite the right fit for her job.

  • @lindapayne1595
    @lindapayne1595 28 днів тому +8

    Because she was going to destroy books owned by Waterstones, that is why she was sacked.

  • @johnwickham9805
    @johnwickham9805 28 днів тому +30

    Women do not even back each other up, they need to stand against the trans nonesence

    • @user-hg2ow2em6n
      @user-hg2ow2em6n 28 днів тому +5

      Who do you think gave the t's the platform and backing they heeded to become privilaged enough to attack women?
      Heard of karma?

    • @salaciouscrumb555
      @salaciouscrumb555 28 днів тому

      ​@@user-hg2ow2em6nit was misogynists like you. You weakling

    • @emma24ism
      @emma24ism 28 днів тому +5

      Women do back each other up, but there are a lot of traitors sadly.

    • @OrwellsHousecat
      @OrwellsHousecat 28 днів тому

      The sisterhood is the tightest cult of them all

    • @phoebecaulfield4062
      @phoebecaulfield4062 28 днів тому +10

      Women are not a homogenous group that all think and act the same way - as you seem to imagine. It has nothing to do with "backing each other up" - we're not a gang from the "West Side Story". 🙄

  • @ocdmusic
    @ocdmusic 28 днів тому +6

    Tilly needs to read some books on karma! 🤭

  • @OrwellsHousecat
    @OrwellsHousecat 28 днів тому +2

    It's misogyny to say any wmn should face the consequences of her actions.
    Labour has said that they will make Misogyny a hate crime.

  • @madmelwood3778
    @madmelwood3778 26 днів тому +1

    Never an excuse for burning books

  • @user-hg2ow2em6n
    @user-hg2ow2em6n 28 днів тому +3

    What goes around comes around....
    What's good for the goose is good for the gander...
    Karma is a b*itch....

  • @terryjacob8169
    @terryjacob8169 29 днів тому +8

    Good.

  • @ChrisPhillipsDrumLessons
    @ChrisPhillipsDrumLessons 28 днів тому +2

    Waterstones is a class act

  • @davetdowell
    @davetdowell 28 днів тому +1

    Well done Waterstones. If you won't stand against 'book burning' who will, eh?
    Evelyn Beatrice Hall would be proud of you for this stance and action.
    Cancel culture is exactly the same thing as blame culture, not just unproductive, but counter productive.

  • @Toracube
    @Toracube 26 днів тому +1

    You are paid to put books out..Not rip them up, love…

  • @Josie545
    @Josie545 28 днів тому +2

    She would have been delighted if someone was sacked or cancelled for agreeing with JKR’s beliefs. Sorry but what’s good for the goose is good for the gander! No sympathy suck it up!

  • @DFrDaug7970
    @DFrDaug7970 28 днів тому +2

    Poor Tilly, gotta attend book anger management training...😢

  • @user-xu9ht9fx4e
    @user-xu9ht9fx4e 27 днів тому +3

    There not even trans women, just trans,, there men , full stop

  • @acerrubrum5749
    @acerrubrum5749 29 днів тому +1

    What are Waterstones media policies?
    Has Waterstones fired anyone else?
    How would she know what the author thinks if she hasn't read the book?
    Presumably her job was to READ and review, not throw books in the garbage and tell other not to purchase.
    Is free speech as a representative of a company, need to be more circumspect ?
    Is she giving an honest critique or suggesting that this book should be thrown out unread because of her personal biases?
    It does make one wonder if she is incapable of doing her job and brings into doubt if she has actually read and reviewed previous books.🎉
    More journalism, facts, and information, less um um um

    • @fabiennemitchell2371
      @fabiennemitchell2371 28 днів тому +1

      There is no big issue apart from Tilly Fitzgerald using social media in a way that connected her to her employer. Social media posts was a forbidden act, and it did not matter what her thoughts were.

    • @acerrubrum5749
      @acerrubrum5749 28 днів тому

      @@fabiennemitchell2371 Good to know, thanks. That sheds a completely different light on the situation.

  • @jablev564
    @jablev564 23 дні тому +1

    Oh dear. What a shame. Not.

  • @jk6919
    @jk6919 27 днів тому

    I support free speech. I do not want to see anyone fired for their speech....even when I dislike what they say.

  • @carasimpsontanooki9188
    @carasimpsontanooki9188 11 днів тому +1

    I still support Waterstones ❤

  • @michaelvoisey8458
    @michaelvoisey8458 28 днів тому +4

    Recycle not put in the bin

  • @jaynehenderson5240
    @jaynehenderson5240 26 днів тому +1

    Ms. McLatchie Miller, the pro-trans ideology side of this debate is not the "liberal" side. Many liberals are opposed to trans ideology. Trans people and most of the media like to say we're all conservatives bcuz it's easier for them to dismiss us then. We are from all points on the political spectrum. I'm surprised to hear you don't know that.

  • @pickleperryemz
    @pickleperryemz 28 днів тому +2

    Waterstones have finally got the message, I’ve been purchasing books elsewhere for the past year since they started selling the propaganda book ‘beautiful black british history’, it should have been called the book of lies and trying to rewrite history. If they want my custom again they will stop selling that rubbish for a start.

  • @pkkerley6028
    @pkkerley6028 27 днів тому +1

    Another virtuous waste of space bites the dust,

  • @MultiVentris
    @MultiVentris 28 днів тому +1

    Well Tilly has a lot of free time now to love books. 📕

  • @janpetersen7440
    @janpetersen7440 29 днів тому +12

    The whole cancel culture stems from the Me-too movement - which, by the way, was also about confused women.

    • @AdaGeddon
      @AdaGeddon 28 днів тому +3

      No, it wasn't.

    • @barryevans791
      @barryevans791 28 днів тому +4

      Key word "also". Bring back the days when people didn't want to throw paint everywhere, tear down statues and cancel people they don't agree with.

  • @JL-sw7mh
    @JL-sw7mh 28 днів тому +1

    What books were they burning, Kevin?

  • @user-nq1vs4ss9x
    @user-nq1vs4ss9x 26 днів тому

    I totally disagree with Tilly's comments but I also deplore people being fired for expressing opinions on their own time and their own social media - even ridiculous opinions.

  • @patrickwalker-nolan7617
    @patrickwalker-nolan7617 28 днів тому +1

    It’s not the JK Rowling point of view it’s the grownup point of view, though I believe JK, bless her, does indeed share it. 😂😂😂

  • @lewissmith350
    @lewissmith350 27 днів тому +1

    Its perfectly OK to believe what you want, but a book seller should remember Fahrenheit 451, its what the Michael Moore movie Fahrrenheit 9 11 was in title based on, and not support burning books, as they oppose the beliefs of the person, she is perfectly entitled to believe what she likes, but not to support burning books of pretty typical mainstream beliefs, I could understand if it was some far out hateful extremism, but even then its not for her to burn books, but gender critical beliefs are quite normal and mainstream. She should really be apologising. We are all guilty of hyperbole, but that would have been a better thing. Book sellers are for selling books, not for burning books, thats not their job. Its simple. A book seller should love books, and love reading all sorts of opinions, to support, or even pull them apart, burning books is not the move of intellectuals. Firstly she should apologise.

  • @juliesuberg8965
    @juliesuberg8965 28 днів тому +2

    would she have bought them first. I can quite see why Waterhouse is worried.

  • @dcollins4679
    @dcollins4679 28 днів тому +1

    The "liberal" side my... eye.

  • @blah914
    @blah914 28 днів тому

    pretty sure she got rehired after the lgbt made a stink. personally i find it abhorrent that u cant even go to a bookstore and buy a book without getting harassed by these crazies

  • @iamspartacus3114
    @iamspartacus3114 28 днів тому

    She now has plenty of time to do more reading........to confirm her own ideas.

  • @cherylgreen895
    @cherylgreen895 28 днів тому

    Wow free publicity, now I'm curious about this author. Need to buy the book

  • @sallywright8065
    @sallywright8065 28 днів тому +1

    Bloody Tilly!

  • @stevepowell491
    @stevepowell491 28 днів тому

    If she bought the books, she can destroy them if she wants.
    If she doesn't: Prison seems like a good answer.
    Threatening to destroy the books... that goes to the above two conditions. However, an employer whose business is to sell books won't like the threat to destroy books: Bad form and off to the unemployment line it is.

  • @fabiennemitchell2371
    @fabiennemitchell2371 29 днів тому +3

    Tilly Fitzgerald breached her employment contract about social media - the only reason she was sacked.

  • @charlieburrows7490
    @charlieburrows7490 28 днів тому

    This is the way of things now.. don’t agree with something? Whaaa whaa.. whaaa I’m going to cancel them.. ignore them and claim they’re evil. This was foreseen years ago when kids were given way too much leeway.. no discipline, never told no.. this is the result. I’m 40.. so I ain’t some pensioner whingeing about “the youth of today”… these are kids that our generation have had.. little brats that grew up and had their kids and now everyone’s entitled.

  • @STEVEBINNION1
    @STEVEBINNION1 29 днів тому +2

    We love you Kev... but please try and stop saying um and are so much ❤

  • @misfit2022
    @misfit2022 28 днів тому +1

    Is normal service being resumed?

  • @Sp0tthed0gt
    @Sp0tthed0gt 28 днів тому

    I don't mind if she years up copies of books, or burns them, provided she buys them first. I somehow doubt that was her intention.

  • @geraldcoffey3303
    @geraldcoffey3303 28 днів тому +1

    You still seem to hold on to the transwoman label.

  • @nightowl7459
    @nightowl7459 26 днів тому

    If only the British Bashing Corporation was as staunch and socialist media rules as Waterstones.

  • @merlinambrosius4398
    @merlinambrosius4398 27 днів тому

    Rowling as in toe ... not wow. Can you still not get this right?

  • @tenniskinsella7768
    @tenniskinsella7768 27 днів тому

    They voted labour for gods sake why

  • @Guitar387
    @Guitar387 28 днів тому

    I think it is wrong that anyone should be sacked for their views on gender whether they support the ideology or not.

    • @Sp0tthed0gt
      @Sp0tthed0gt 28 днів тому +1

      People should be sacked for destroying other people's property.

  • @stevemonkey78
    @stevemonkey78 29 днів тому +1

    This is a local chanel for local people. Wel have no trouble here.

    • @nigelcarren
      @nigelcarren 29 днів тому +1

      "My wife lied... There is a block in your toilet!"

  • @emma24ism
    @emma24ism 28 днів тому +1

    I think I'll go buy a book from Waterstones.

  • @williambarnes3868
    @williambarnes3868 28 днів тому +1

    Simple bottom line...Keep your personal opinions out of your working life. Man, many people DO NOT agree with your opinions and you CANNOT foist your woke ideas onto other people.

  • @Hipnosis65
    @Hipnosis65 28 днів тому

    Topic aside... just call it X.

  • @MrPinkStrat
    @MrPinkStrat 28 днів тому

    It's Time this Liberal Freak show Came to an End & WE got back To Normality & Common Sense !

  • @deal2live
    @deal2live 28 днів тому +1

    I do not agree with this. But I know for sure she loves JK Rowling being cancelled!

  • @pomerau
    @pomerau 28 днів тому +1

    I couldn't follow this story at all. Which side was this influencer, er, on? I gave up after 4 minutes. Fan of Kevin btw.

    • @ETM2024
      @ETM2024 28 днів тому +2

      Tilly, a Waterstones employee, is fully on board with the woke side and thinks cancelling people whom she deems as terfs for daring to think there is such a thing as a real woman is perfectly fine. The author is one such person and is part of a publishing network that seeks to protect women in that space from being cancelled for their views. Tilly found out, threw a hissy fit and said she would destroy the authors books and throw them in the bin. This breached Waterstones social media policy and she was fired. She then made a video bemoaning her lot and seeking validation for her actions, hoping to get the woke mob on board and force her employer to walk back their stance and start harassing the author to get her cancelled etc, because she hasn't learned her lesson. The mob did exactly what was expected, contacted the employer and the media and turned it into a bigger situation and now here we are.

    • @pomerau
      @pomerau 28 днів тому +1

      @@ETM2024 Well written too. Thank you for that.

    • @ETM2024
      @ETM2024 28 днів тому +1

      @@pomerau
      You're welcome 👍

  • @user-ck2hr5vn8e
    @user-ck2hr5vn8e 28 днів тому

    Um.. what is Waterstones?

  • @haydenwalton2766
    @haydenwalton2766 28 днів тому

    'first they came for the communists, but i did not speak out.....'

  • @keithdenton8386
    @keithdenton8386 28 днів тому

    They can become trans, but not trans women.

  • @anthonyharmon7242
    @anthonyharmon7242 28 днів тому +1

    Middle class woman with nothing going on in her life professional Karen and we give these people position's of power

  • @Pepper6972
    @Pepper6972 28 днів тому

    She knows it's Waterstones policy not to post these posts. So you did it and lost your job. Your own doing Silly Tilly.

  • @carltaylor6452
    @carltaylor6452 29 днів тому +5

    I'm as gender critical/sex realist as they come, but I still don't think this woman should have been sacked. One of the reasons I despise gender ideology is because of its intolerance; trans activists hate freedom of speech; but we have to defend it, especially for speech we disagree with. And there's a lot of hypocrisy from the trans activist mob in this case, demanding Waterstones reinstate her, because they regularly target gender critical people for 'cancellation', many of whom have lost their livelihoods, etc.

    • @simonclare-fu7sx
      @simonclare-fu7sx 29 днів тому +5

      agreed but it will give her a much needed lesson, burnt by her own ideology

    • @carltaylor6452
      @carltaylor6452 29 днів тому +1

      @@simonclare-fu7sx Oh yes, I'm not saying I don't feel the schadenfreude!

    • @bules6790
      @bules6790 29 днів тому +5

      I disagree. She said..."Oh I'll enjoy tearing up your books and putting them in the bin".
      If you work for a book store it's a reasonable assumption from the employer (if they stock the author) that they mean their merchandise.
      You dont want your employees saying you will destroy their products on social media...

    • @nielszindel1151
      @nielszindel1151 28 днів тому +1

      Her employer will have staff conduct rules. Her job is to sell book for them, even books she does not like. Delia Morris

    • @MrCliveado
      @MrCliveado 28 днів тому +2

      You're welcome to your opinion but I disagree. She discovered the consequences to her actions.

  • @alext.5853
    @alext.5853 28 днів тому +1

    Mein Kampf - love of books? Bad example.

  • @GeorgesDupont-do8pe
    @GeorgesDupont-do8pe 26 днів тому

    Does an employer with no respect for obvious truth deserve you? No.

  • @TheMindfulnessLab
    @TheMindfulnessLab 28 днів тому

    I found an echo chamber

  • @sparkyinsertnamehere6673
    @sparkyinsertnamehere6673 26 днів тому

    Its time we had a law guaranteeing free speech. I disagree with virtue signalling Tilly about her idiotic views, but this creeping tide of censorship (you listening UA-cam?) has got to be stopped.

  • @Rosemary-iz5vc
    @Rosemary-iz5vc 28 днів тому

    Anyone else think Tilly looks rather manly?

  • @MS-jm7me
    @MS-jm7me 28 днів тому

    EVERYONE. BOYCOTT WATERSTONES BUY ONLINE FROM OTHER BOOKSELLERS ,,,YOU KNOW WHO I MEAN !!

  • @padijeff5675
    @padijeff5675 28 днів тому

    Tilly was right to bring theses Terfs to account!😮

  • @alasshewasthehighwaywoman8886
    @alasshewasthehighwaywoman8886 29 днів тому +4

    So fucking great ❤ boohoo, babe! Boohoo 🥲🥲🥲

  • @rachellandry3116
    @rachellandry3116 28 днів тому

    I do not like "Mein Kampf"
    cuz its in book form. The book matters. If I keep such a book on my shelf for hhistoric research purposes, its not front and center.... with gold gilt edge.. its in the "special collections" corner where the spiders live.....
    all books are basically flammable and thus good for starting fires..
    as for us clutching pearls about it?
    eh....
    book burners waste far more time burning their fingers and someone's feelings than freezing crappy messages via bound msterial.
    This Book is Queer is an example if perfectly good flammable eohemera ..
    hell.. just typing in the name of the book could be a suspendable offense.. cuz the title includes They Who Shall not be Named!

  • @mjm0787
    @mjm0787 29 днів тому +1

    Lois, you are really fit.

  • @user-sq8rs1bu9y
    @user-sq8rs1bu9y 29 днів тому

    ITS EASY BOYCOTT WHATERSTONES

    • @ruthcollins2841
      @ruthcollins2841 29 днів тому +5

      Why boycott them? Silly Tilly broke their rules.🤷‍♀️

    • @nielszindel1151
      @nielszindel1151 28 днів тому

      No way they believe all books have rights. It would make me buy from them. Delia Morris