obviously not. actively making the world a more just and fair place is objectivly a good thing. but i suppose there are always those that want to keep privilege for themselves instead of sharing it, whether it meant standing against the civil rights and women's suffrage movements in the past, or DEI today.
@@rahdo No Radho, actively being a racist and "in the name of diversity" choosing winners and losers based on the color of their skin is the OPPOSITE of a just and fair place. Martin Luther King Jr is rolling in his grave over this leftist crap you nutjobs keep flinging. Objectively you are acting like Nazis, the sad thing you do not realize it, until when? When is enough? When you chose people on their merit, hard work, ability, and are color and gender blind, THAT is a just and fair place. The endless pandering is so funny from the actual privileged.
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9miVG2xT5jY/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for your review. 👍
Unfortunate coincidence. Diversity, equity, and inclusion, which, obviously, sucks.
obviously not. actively making the world a more just and fair place is objectivly a good thing.
but i suppose there are always those that want to keep privilege for themselves instead of sharing it, whether it meant standing against the civil rights and women's suffrage movements in the past, or DEI today.
@@rahdo No Radho, actively being a racist and "in the name of diversity" choosing winners and losers based on the color of their skin is the OPPOSITE of a just and fair place. Martin Luther King Jr is rolling in his grave over this leftist crap you nutjobs keep flinging. Objectively you are acting like Nazis, the sad thing you do not realize it, until when? When is enough? When you chose people on their merit, hard work, ability, and are color and gender blind, THAT is a just and fair place. The endless pandering is so funny from the actual privileged.
@@rahdo you are so privledged Macro deletes my comment!