Lovely video thanks to Orhan and Toni,I love the way he speaks, so knowledgeable. I get scared when he says "This may be a bit difficult to explain". Thanks guys
Brilliant Toni and Orhan! This is an incredibly important discussion on a challenging and powerful technology. Thanks for your time putting this together.
discussion around example with silent host cafe in slide named "RT-5 silent host" ended to RT-2 update sent by SW-101. so where does RT-5 play role there? quite confusing.
good video guys,. but i must confess it is quite difficult to follow if you do not annotate or use your mouse to show or point to what you are talking about. it makes it really difficult. i had to rewind several times. good effort though , it is not easy to explain so i appreciate the effort
In the 47th minute when Toni is explaining about silent hosts the route type used is type 2 right and not type 5. But when you guys discuss you are talking about route type 5. Am little confused. Sorry if I had missed anything
This video is the part of Orhan Ergun's EVPN - VXLAN Zero to Hero Training with Toni Pasanen. You can access to it on www.orhanergun.net/courses/self-paced-evpn-vxlan-training You can follow Orhan Ergun on Twitter twitter.com/OrhanErgunCCDE If you found this video helpful, like the video and don't forget to subscribe to channel, receive the notification!. Much more information on EVPN and other MPLS VPN or many other MPLS Topics, you can access to full course on : orhanergun.net/courses/self-paced-ccie-service-provider-training/
when we talk about route-type 4 , and taking the scenario of VXLAN with VPC fabric-peering , i don't see route-type 4 being shared or present in the "l2vpn evpn bgp update " , so , is this statement correct that for all ethernet shared segment, route type -4 route will be shared ?
Thank you Orhan for this exellent conversion sharing and I REALLY REALLY appreciate it. I just have a small question about the silent host issue by EVPN Route Type-5, how the AGW for VLAN10 in Leaf-102 get this prefix route if there is no VLAN10 interface but only VLAN20? I mean this prefix route is automatically generated by other leaf nodes wherever there is VLAN10 interface or it need to be manually configured? And I think in the normal condition in a large data center there should be a numerous leaf nodes that's also the concern i asked this question.
Thanks Orhan and Passanen for the fruitful explanation however I have question , In my production environment i observed that there is no different RT has been assigned to route type-2 MAC and MAC-IP route. My question is in what situation SW does assign same RT to both type-2 (MAC and MAC-IP)? What is the harm or benefit of having same or different RT in BGP EVPN l2 route scenario?
But actually there are more types available, like type 678, use cases tenant multicast. Basically is BGP fashion encoding IGMP control plane and others like BGP mvpn ad route something like that, but it’s still drafting RFC. If you’re interested about it, you can check latest version Cisco nexus 9000 configuration guide and chapter TRM(tenant routing multicast maybe..
Orhan Ergun thank you for this amazing course and reply. In my personal opinion, BGP Address family is the way to encoding traditional control plane to BGP update messages and distribute to other speakers. So BGP is too powerful. But in today’s network, it has too many replicated func inside BGP AFI, so maybe best BGP design course is on the way...I think..
Type 4 route NLRI is NOT always sent in Cisco's VXLAN implementation only with anycast border gateways. VPC leafs and border gateways uses VPC rules for DF election
they both must be well versed in this particular technology..But they lack teaching skills according to me...they are just talking...I am missing the why and big picture...
Zipp zapp, don't be a $^%#! You try presenting in a second language!? Never ceases to amaze me how these guys can explain difficult technologies and topics in a foreign language. Good job guys 👏
Toni Pasanen's blog must be inclided to CCIE DC curriculum! This was the place of truth where I found many things which were absent in official documentation to NX-OS.
Great work Orhan and Toni, thank you so much
the best explanation of type-1 and type-4 in the internet
Lovely video thanks to Orhan and Toni,I love the way he speaks, so knowledgeable. I get scared when he says "This may be a bit difficult to explain". Thanks guys
Brilliant Toni and Orhan! This is an incredibly important discussion on a challenging and powerful technology. Thanks for your time putting this together.
Welcome Dave
Thanks a lot guys, you are doing an amazing job with your videos, I am looking forward for another ones.
Great explanation of everything I couldn't get by my own.
Thanks for your work Orhan and Toni!
Nice to hear that
discussion around example with silent host cafe in slide named "RT-5 silent host" ended to RT-2 update sent by SW-101. so where does RT-5 play role there? quite confusing.
good video guys,. but i must confess it is quite difficult to follow if you do not annotate or use your mouse to show or point to what you are talking about. it makes it really difficult. i had to rewind several times. good effort though , it is not easy to explain so i appreciate the effort
Fantastic detailed explanation.. Appreciate it
Thanks Orhan for rephrasing and making the explanations more coherent.
Thank you Orhan and Toni .... Excellent Stuff .... It's really worth spending 2 hours or maybe more on this video :)
20 hours full course on EVPN , VXLAN and LISP coming soon :)
@@OrhanErgunCCDE When? Where?
@@jzartmann Hi Jacob, we already started recording, when the outline is completed, course will be published on www.orhanergun.net
Amazingly informative!!! Toni please speak near yo mic 🎤... really having the hard time understanding to low pitch voice....
You both are legends 💜👏
In the 47th minute when Toni is explaining about silent hosts the route type used is type 2 right and not type 5. But when you guys discuss you are talking about route type 5. Am little confused. Sorry if I had missed anything
still not clear how does switch bind specific RT-2 to RT-1|RT-4 route.
This video is the part of Orhan Ergun's EVPN - VXLAN Zero to Hero Training with Toni Pasanen. You can access to it on www.orhanergun.net/courses/self-paced-evpn-vxlan-training
You can follow Orhan Ergun on Twitter twitter.com/OrhanErgunCCDE
If you found this video helpful, like the video and don't forget to subscribe to channel, receive the notification!. Much more information on EVPN and other MPLS VPN or many other MPLS Topics, you can access to full course on : orhanergun.net/courses/self-paced-ccie-service-provider-training/
when we talk about route-type 4 , and taking the scenario of VXLAN with VPC fabric-peering , i don't see route-type 4 being shared or present in the "l2vpn evpn bgp update " , so , is this statement correct that for all ethernet shared segment, route type -4 route will be shared ?
Thank you Orhan for this exellent conversion sharing and I REALLY REALLY appreciate it.
I just have a small question about the silent host issue by EVPN Route Type-5, how the AGW for VLAN10 in Leaf-102 get this prefix route if there is no VLAN10 interface but only VLAN20? I mean this prefix route is automatically generated by other leaf nodes wherever there is VLAN10 interface or it need to be manually configured? And I think in the normal condition in a large data center there should be a numerous leaf nodes that's also the concern i asked this question.
Thanks Orhan and Passanen for the fruitful explanation however I have question , In my production environment i observed that there is no different RT has been assigned to route type-2 MAC and MAC-IP route.
My question is in what situation SW does assign same RT to both type-2 (MAC and MAC-IP)?
What is the harm or benefit of having same or different RT in BGP EVPN l2 route scenario?
Master class Toni!
Very knowledgeable video. Thanks Orhan and Toni....
Enjoy
EVPN course is not ready yet? I just checked the website and its not there yet
I don’t see much request here as a comment, thus we didn’t put much emphasis
Hi Orhan, this is a great video, possible to share the slides, please..
Orhan, what do think about running BGP-EVPN with two stand alone Nexus switches (no spine) across an MPLS WAN?
Useful material.
Amazing video, thanks!
thanks for you effort
Can you please provide the link to the EVPN book you mentioned at beginning of the video? WOuld love to go over it. Thanks
Perhaps it is this? leanpub.com/virtualextensiblelanvxlanapracticalguidetovxlansolutionpart1
Great video. Would be even greater if Toni had had a proper microphone :/
But actually there are more types available, like type 678, use cases tenant multicast. Basically is BGP fashion encoding IGMP control plane and others like BGP mvpn ad route something like that, but it’s still drafting RFC. If you’re interested about it, you can check latest version Cisco nexus 9000 configuration guide and chapter TRM(tenant routing multicast maybe..
Yes I seen that, and morr will come too
Orhan Ergun thank you for this amazing course and reply. In my personal opinion, BGP Address family is the way to encoding traditional control plane to BGP update messages and distribute to other speakers. So BGP is too powerful. But in today’s network, it has too many replicated func inside BGP AFI, so maybe best BGP design course is on the way...I think..
awesome !!
Type 4 route NLRI is NOT always sent in Cisco's VXLAN implementation only with anycast border gateways. VPC leafs and border gateways uses VPC rules for DF election
For the single site, two PE scenario, how DF election is performed there then? Is it SH Label etc?
@@OrhanErgunCCDE I'm not sure what you mean? In VPC the DF is negotiated between the peers.
Please make presentations on ethernet oam
more on this -> LISP book
nice
Awesome
they both must be well versed in this particular technology..But they lack teaching skills according to me...they are just talking...I am missing the why and big picture...
good vid, but awful pronunciation.
Two non-native speakers, forgive us :)
Zipp zapp, don't be a $^%#! You try presenting in a second language!? Never ceases to amaze me how these guys can explain difficult technologies and topics in a foreign language. Good job guys 👏
Toni Pasanen's blog must be inclided to CCIE DC curriculum! This was the place of truth where I found many things which were absent in official documentation to NX-OS.