Yes, however the previous question was actually quite backhanded: "it could have been a play". This is definitely not a compliment and it just flew over his head.
I'm sorry but it was actually terrible and not at all for the reasons everyone was pointing to. Since it drops every ounce of realism and naturality, it just becomes a pointless and pretentious exercise on a sort of pure theatricality to which Jobs & Apple were absolutely secondary. For instance, seeing a 6 year old Lisa drop the same pace and complexity of dialogue as Steve looked like an involuntary self-parody. Ironically, just like Jobs in the 80s, Sorkin just became completely self-absorbed in the last decade and stopped delivering decent quality.
I have no issue with a moderator type being there, I probably prefer it. It's Steven Galloway specifically that's the problem. Whether by presumption, condescension, or basic general interuptiveness, he never misses and opportunity to incorrectly read a room and barge in at the wrong time. And this has been routinely for a number of years now. He is objectively awful at doing this.
You have Aaron Sorkin at the table and can ask him any question and you choose to ask him about some stupid emotional rumor? Some people are just beyond reach.
@@reelinlucky1074 well she did write the screenplay for what I recall being a fairly well successful and critically appreciated film. Part of the point of this series was trying to capture that particular moment of the industry, even if it was someone new (well the fact that each one is directly based around those who are connected with the nominations season). It's not always about "lets bring these filmmaking giants together".
If you watch any Aaron Sorkin interview, he says the same things and same stories, almost word for word. He is a fantastic writer, but not a very good improviser
a lot of the interviews he does they give him pretty much the same questions so it's not surprising that he has a series of polished go-to answers for them. For the longer interviews you get more off the cuff stuff out of him.
From 3:08 on, Aaron Sorkin destroyed that interviewer's question.
Yes, however the previous question was actually quite backhanded: "it could have been a play". This is definitely not a compliment and it just flew over his head.
Steve Jobs by Aaron Sorkin was the best screenplay of 2015. *Shame* on the Academy for not nominating it for Best Adapted Screenplay.
I'm sorry but it was actually terrible and not at all for the reasons everyone was pointing to. Since it drops every ounce of realism and naturality, it just becomes a pointless and pretentious exercise on a sort of pure theatricality to which Jobs & Apple were absolutely secondary. For instance, seeing a 6 year old Lisa drop the same pace and complexity of dialogue as Steve looked like an involuntary self-parody. Ironically, just like Jobs in the 80s, Sorkin just became completely self-absorbed in the last decade and stopped delivering decent quality.
Aaron Sorkin and Amy Schumer being at the same table for outstanding writing is hilarious!
3:08 uh oh
I love what Aaron Sorkins did with Newsroom, amazing writer.
Galloway doesn't need to be here. This roundtable should be run by the writer's. Writer's on Writer's.
Nah. it's called a show :P
I have no issue with a moderator type being there, I probably prefer it. It's Steven Galloway specifically that's the problem. Whether by presumption, condescension, or basic general interuptiveness, he never misses and opportunity to incorrectly read a room and barge in at the wrong time. And this has been routinely for a number of years now. He is objectively awful at doing this.
You have Aaron Sorkin at the table and can ask him any question and you choose to ask him about some stupid emotional rumor? Some people are just beyond reach.
This host is the worst thing about these amazing roundtables.
2:53 is this a scene from The Social Network? 😂
there is always that one odd guest amost the great writers or directors in these round tables. someone that makes you go "really, that person? wtf?"
this one being Amy Schumer
@@reelinlucky1074 well she did write the screenplay for what I recall being a fairly well successful and critically appreciated film. Part of the point of this series was trying to capture that particular moment of the industry, even if it was someone new (well the fact that each one is directly based around those who are connected with the nominations season). It's not always about "lets bring these filmmaking giants together".
Amy is thinking likeeeee whaaaat is happening. When do hot and dumb people show up?
That English guy needs to watch his mouth.
@Etta James because Nicholas might do something to him lol
If you watch any Aaron Sorkin interview, he says the same things and same stories, almost word for word. He is a fantastic writer, but not a very good improviser
a lot of the interviews he does they give him pretty much the same questions so it's not surprising that he has a series of polished go-to answers for them. For the longer interviews you get more off the cuff stuff out of him.