Chinook Ultralight Breakfast at Carrollton, Ohio... Heavy Traffic

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @robertlafnear9115
    @robertlafnear9115 2 роки тому +6

    Just found this aircraft (the Chinook) on another channel............I LOVE THIS ! What a great little plane 🤗Love it !

  • @blairguinea6811
    @blairguinea6811 Рік тому +1

    Great flight Sir, thank you

  • @atmm89
    @atmm89 Рік тому +1

    thank you for the upload, very interesting

  • @justincase1575
    @justincase1575 2 роки тому +3

    I live close by. Have flown into Carrol Co many times!

  • @johnhalter8317
    @johnhalter8317 2 роки тому

    Flew in their many times in my 172, had my picture on the wall at one time.

  • @edgardopinero4748
    @edgardopinero4748 10 місяців тому +1

    Is posible to find a chinook to buy

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  10 місяців тому

      Yes. The one you see in this video is for sale for $12,000 and is a flyable aircraft.
      You can contact me at badge417@ yahoo.com

  • @alanswanson5642
    @alanswanson5642 2 роки тому +2

    I always considered a shute for when you don't have control, not just for engine out

  • @varieze117pj7
    @varieze117pj7 3 роки тому +4

    I was looking at the Detroit Sectional and you have more towers than Montana has mountains.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, there are a lot of towers, but I like them. They keep larger and faster aircraft away from me, as I always fly low.
      Larger planes have an engine and lots of instruments in the front, and cannot see me very well. Some of the guys I fly with have transponders and ADSB, but my Chinook is not required to have one.🙂

  • @sledawgpilot
    @sledawgpilot 2 роки тому +2

    Looks fun.

  • @LWJCarroll
    @LWJCarroll 2 роки тому

    Thanks enjoyed the flight into my namesake!….

  • @Mike-01234
    @Mike-01234 Рік тому +3

    BRS would be useful for midair collisions with birds, or other aircraft or flight control failure.

    • @MicheIIePucca
      @MicheIIePucca Рік тому +1

      Thats what I was thinking. If you had a structural/air frame failure and lost a wing or tail, etc, etc, it probably wouldn't matter what you did with the flight controls. I would settle for hitting the ground anywhere, trees, ground, water, power lines, if I had a parachute slowing my fall so I'd be less likely to lose consciousness, compared to no parachute.

  • @jamesowens2781
    @jamesowens2781 Рік тому

    Subbed thanks might be driving out to Texas this spring

  • @mikep60
    @mikep60 2 роки тому +2

    New meaning to stick tha landing god Almighty bro

  • @markraciborski4289
    @markraciborski4289 2 роки тому +3

    Runway needs a few more cracks.

  • @jacksemporiumofstuff
    @jacksemporiumofstuff Рік тому +4

    This may be a stupid question ( I have so many) but do you navigate by landmarks or do you actually have a GPS unit, maps, or what? What altitude do you usually fly at? I love those little planes! Thanks for posting.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  Рік тому +7

      That is a good question. It is easy to get lost up there. Different times of day and weather conditions can make things look so different, it is easy to get lost. You can't just follow roads, as it is easy to get mixed up.
      When I started flying in 1995, I found it difficult to find grass strips. In Ohio there are many farm fields, and they all look like grass strips.
      When I started flying, I used a sectional maps, followed power lines, and looked for landmarks such as water towers, coal mines, etc. Most towns have their names on the water towers.
      I fly at about 700 or 800 feet above the ground. You won't find big aircraft that low, as they are very afraid of cell towers.
      Later, I got a camping and hikers GPS. They are much cheaper than aircraft units. I always used just the arrow that points to my destination. I flew much straighter with it, and it told my ground speed, too. You will see it in some of my videos attached to my control stick. Thanks for the question.

  • @johnhalter8317
    @johnhalter8317 2 роки тому +1

    Landing long because of hill was an easy mistake for first timers in. The restaurant was really good at one time. I hope it still is.

  • @danseals3128
    @danseals3128 2 роки тому +2

    Man u gotta do o something bout ur fogging lexan. Your whole cabin looks frosted. That could cause complications . Dandahermit

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      Camera angle makes it seem a lot worse than it is.

  • @alanswanson5642
    @alanswanson5642 2 роки тому +1

    There was one a couple hundred miles from me 2500. Needed a recovering. Still kick myself for passing on it

  • @kenferguson2341
    @kenferguson2341 2 роки тому +1

    Loved your video
    It's been a while since I've flown into that airport for grub 😀

  • @edgardopinero4748
    @edgardopinero4748 10 місяців тому

    Where is de factory?

  • @timbo21
    @timbo21 2 роки тому +3

    Amazing bird you have. Did you build it or buy it built?

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому +4

      I built it it 2001. Took 90 days. Been modifying it ever since. Engine has over 1400 hours on it with no parts required. Only gaskets. Just now put in new rings and replaced 2 main bearings on the crankshaft.

  • @varieze117pj7
    @varieze117pj7 3 роки тому +2

    I'm jealous.

  • @451dskots88
    @451dskots88 2 роки тому +4

    How fast is the chinook? Awesome video, really enjoyed it.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому +7

      Top speed on mine is about 95 mph. I have 65 hp. I almost never go that fast. I cruise at 65 to 75 when flying with others. If I am buy myself, usually 60 mph. I am not talking knots. It drinks about 3.5 gph
      Faster speeds = $$$
      There is one of my videos where I go 95 on a pass down the runway. My early videos do not have narration, only subtitles.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому +4

      I built it in 2001. Engine was used, and I had that before getting the kit. Took me 90 days to build, paint, and wire it. First plane I ever built. Engine had 1400 hours on it before I put anything but gaskets in it. Check my videos. Thanks

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 Рік тому

      Anyone wanting a new engine on one of these has to pay for an 80 horse power Rotax 912 now the 65 horse power 582 is out of production.

  • @1pottercounty
    @1pottercounty 2 роки тому

    Surprised you didn’t do a run up…

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      There are cuts in the video. Some of my videos show my run-up and mag check, but others do not. How many times do you want to to see it?

  • @kevinwelsh7490
    @kevinwelsh7490 2 роки тому

    I want an ultralight float plane to fly just above the waves like a WIG. it seems WIG are too complex and nobody makes them anyway. why isn't there such an aircraft?

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      I think you would find very few places in Ohio to land a float plane. Lake Erie, the Ohio river, and some private lakes. Better check into it.

    • @kevinwelsh7490
      @kevinwelsh7490 2 роки тому

      @@Adventurepilot70 I don't understand. What would stop me from landing on Georgia Strait, which is a 30 miles wide inland sea in British Columbia, Canada?

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      @@kevinwelsh7490 Maybe nothing. I am just saying you are limited in the state of Ohio.

  • @edgardopinero4748
    @edgardopinero4748 10 місяців тому

    I dont have idea of price

  • @EdwardKelly-vi9sg
    @EdwardKelly-vi9sg 10 місяців тому

    IS THIS A PART 103 OR A LSA

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  10 місяців тому +1

      This is an LSA aircaft. While it is an ultralight type aircraft, it has 2 seats, large fuel tanks, and a weight of 550 lbs. The top speed in level flight is 95 mph.

    • @EdwardKelly-vi9sg
      @EdwardKelly-vi9sg 10 місяців тому

      @@Adventurepilot70 THANX...WHY DO THEY ADVERTISE IT AS A ULTRALIGHT AND NOT A LIGHT SPORT AIRCRAFT

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  10 місяців тому +1

      @@EdwardKelly-vi9sg Early Chinooks were single seat, had only a Rotax 277 engine and 5 gallon fuel tanks. They were indeed an ultralight.

  • @enzolee5772
    @enzolee5772 Рік тому

    Is this still for sale?

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  Рік тому

      Yes. Just keep watching the videos on the play list. There are several showing my last flight in it to Put-in-Bay. Videos now are how it was several weeks ago. They are on a timer.

    • @enzolee5772
      @enzolee5772 Рік тому

      ​@@Adventurepilot70 I'd like more information as I'm interested in purchasing it. How can I get in touch with you?

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  Рік тому

      You can contact me at badge417@yahoo.com

  • @donausmus4281
    @donausmus4281 Рік тому

    Looking for a landing spot is a good idea. But it's almost as if he expects it.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  Рік тому +1

      When flying Ultralight type aircraft, you should always expect it and be prepared for a forced landing. I practice forced landings.

    • @donausmus4281
      @donausmus4281 Рік тому

      @@Adventurepilot70 good idea! I flew a Kitfox II for 5 years ( about 500 hours). The Rotax 582 never sputtered.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  Рік тому +1

      I had 1489 hours on my 582 there when I sold the Chinook. The engine was in great shape as you can see in my engine video.
      2 best things I did was remove oil injection, and run zero pressure in cooling system.

  • @mmichaeldonavon
    @mmichaeldonavon 2 роки тому

    Is that a screaming 2 cycle? 582?

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      Yes. It is a grayhead Rotax 582 with 65HP. 1489 hours when I sold it. Still running fine.
      I do take it apart about every 300 hours to check wear and be sure rings are not stuck.
      See my other videos.

  • @glbaker5595
    @glbaker5595 Рік тому

    Anyone know what the top wind speed is that you can fly that in safely, I know very little about flying always thought I would enjoy it though, stay safe out there

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  Рік тому

      I usually prefer crosswinds of 20 mph or less if landing on pavement. 25 mph if landing on grass. Need to watch out for rotors when landing down in a slot with trees. Winds straight down the runway are no problem.

  • @edpaine7982
    @edpaine7982 2 роки тому

    How do I find this single seat chinook? I have recently decided this is the plane I need.. wanted another Aventura UL but this could be a lot of fun when done right.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      Keep checking on barnstormers.com. A single seater would be an ultralight.

  • @kneedeepinbluebells5538
    @kneedeepinbluebells5538 2 роки тому +1

    A M E R I C A ...

  • @danseals3128
    @danseals3128 2 роки тому +1

    Thats like flying in powder snow. I'm in from Alaska n I like to see. Haha.Hard to dodge tree tops if ya can't see them. Aye??

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  2 роки тому

      Hard to see wires, too. I know where they are, because we fly this route every saturday in the summer. We don't fly in winter.

  • @Manggarbelitung-d2f
    @Manggarbelitung-d2f 4 місяці тому

    Semoga ...... I love and I like .....😮😮😮😢😢😢😮😮😮 🎉🎉🎉 respect .... Respect. AVIATOR AIR show sports flying wind speed sport.

  • @ItAintMeBabe99
    @ItAintMeBabe99 2 роки тому

    A ballistic parachute should not be deployed for an “engine out”. It is there for a catastrophic failure of you air frame or controls. With an engine out, just pick a spot and land it.

  • @L2FlyMN
    @L2FlyMN Рік тому

    They say a successful landing, is any landing you can walk away from, a bad landing though, is cringeworthy expensive & a sick feeling to see any damage to your bird knowing you’ll be grounded till repairs are made!!!!!!! 😖😫😢

  • @Manggarbelitung-d2f
    @Manggarbelitung-d2f 4 місяці тому

    Mudah-mudahan kita bertemu dan kamek akan membuat itu jika yang di atas mengiizinkan and people serta kemampuan dari diri bisa membawa orang banyak keatas melihat pemandangan alam dan melihat pemandangan di bawah pemandangan yang luas penciptaan dari alam ........ ???? !???!!! Mmm dan kita juga bisa ya ... Turun melihat pemandangan yang dari dan sebelum kita di atas kembali people AVIATOR AIR show sports location imformasi engine airport this is line street. Hoo hoo good luck people share processing..... ????

  • @Manggarbelitung-d2f
    @Manggarbelitung-d2f 4 місяці тому

    AVIATOR AIR show sports speed wind teak up flying high and slowly but reality play landing speed sport AVIATOR AIR show. 😮😮😮🎉🎉🎉😮😮😮.

  • @varieze117pj7
    @varieze117pj7 3 роки тому +3

    Your radio seems to work well with your antenna setup. I saw that in an earlier video. I'm gonna copy your setup. k.i.s.s.

    • @Adventurepilot70
      @Adventurepilot70  3 роки тому +2

      I have used the same A3 radio for over 25 years. $165 ICOM. Range is an easy 80 miles. I no longer use the rechargable battery pack, and have the adapter wired into cigarette lighter 12v power.