DIY Hot Tub- Part 2: setting the first blocks

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @heroknaderi
    @heroknaderi 4 роки тому +3

    I’m doing the same project too. Great job 👍

  • @ShahriarBahmani-z2s
    @ShahriarBahmani-z2s 3 місяці тому

    Hello John. I am Making a small hot tub in my backyard, 4 x 4 foot. I'm putting 7 jets, do I need to put separate pump for jet and filters, and how do I buy 7 complete jets with housing like the one you have?

    • @johncoaltrain9485
      @johncoaltrain9485  3 місяці тому

      @@ShahriarBahmani-z2s get a hold of Gene at custombuiltspas.com and he can run the specs, see how many jets you need, calculate the HP of the pump you need, etc.

  • @robertsoobramani202
    @robertsoobramani202 3 роки тому

    Hi John. I noticed you mortared the block straight into the concrete base. I was told I need to have steel rods/bars coming out of the base. The blocks are then to installed over the steel then the blocks loaded with concrete. Is this necessary?

    • @johncoaltrain9485
      @johncoaltrain9485  3 роки тому

      Not necessary unless you plan on building a deeper tub than mine. And mine is deep. That’s a common way of building pools. But not necessary for this type of tub. (Please look into Gene’s book at custombuiltspas.com for a more detailed explanation.)

    • @robertsoobramani202
      @robertsoobramani202 3 роки тому

      @@johncoaltrain9485 Thxs...appreciate it

  • @friendlyoldbum9182
    @friendlyoldbum9182 2 роки тому

    If you use Pythagoras Theorem correctly you can use the total length of your edges (a and b). You don't always have a easy 3-4

    • @johncoaltrain9485
      @johncoaltrain9485  2 роки тому

      I’m a math guy. The Pythagorean Theorem is definitely useful. BUT way more practical to find, or make, a 3 and 4 to measure your 5. For those who don’t walk around with a scientific calculator and get overwhelmed by decimal and fraction conversions, I’d say sticking with the 3-4-5 method (which is really just a simplified Pythagorean equation anyway) is the most practical solution. In my opinion of course. :)

    • @friendlyoldbum9182
      @friendlyoldbum9182 2 роки тому

      @@johncoaltrain9485 Haha yeah I don't bother testing my mental math abilities.
      Larger scale it is more practical to go 3-4-5. Though i'd argue that everyone has a phone in their pocket now days 😂
      I'm thinking from a metal fab point of view, often I have needed the theorem in situations I didn't have the length on a or b and a square isn't comfortably usable.
      Up to part 6 in this build 👌

    • @friendlyoldbum9182
      @friendlyoldbum9182 2 роки тому

      @@johncoaltrain9485 I'm in Aus so we use metric, imperial would be a pain in the butt.

    • @johncoaltrain9485
      @johncoaltrain9485  2 роки тому

      @@friendlyoldbum9182 I’ve spent my life learning how to calculate in Freedom Units, so I can’t be much help with metric. 😂 I kid, I kid. Good luck on your build if you’re trying your hand at this.

  • @danieli708
    @danieli708 3 роки тому

    You remember what the cinders cost, roughly?

    • @johncoaltrain9485
      @johncoaltrain9485  3 роки тому

      I don’t, honestly. Construction material costs fluctuate a lot these days.