Integral over a ring

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2018
  • In this video I calculate the integral of 1/sqrt(x^2 + y^2) over the ring with inner radius a and outer radius b. It’s nothing fancy, but I think the result is pretty neat!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @taubone9257
    @taubone9257 5 років тому +17

    6:16 What a beautiful simplicification

  • @marcioamaral7511
    @marcioamaral7511 5 років тому +11

    Anyone remembered ring of charge from classic E & M?

  • @Arycke
    @Arycke 5 років тому +1

    Your jokes are so great! I make jokes like that all the time (shoulda put a ring on it) lol. I love your personality and your style of teaching :D

  • @The_Professor123
    @The_Professor123 5 років тому +6

    very nice. Gives me confidence in multivariable calc :>

  • @juliusgroenjes8115
    @juliusgroenjes8115 5 років тому +2

    This was awesome! I love your videos, Gruss von Deutschland!

  • @duckymomo7935
    @duckymomo7935 5 років тому +4

    If you like Dr Peyam then you should integrate a ring with him

  • @tatjanagobold2810
    @tatjanagobold2810 5 років тому

    Haha I love your videos! Wish we had teachers like you here in our school in Austria:D

  • @scottalder2374
    @scottalder2374 5 років тому

    I had a feeling we'd get a Peyam video today! Yaay

  • @Czeckie
    @Czeckie 5 років тому +4

    commutative algebra kids will understand that double entendre title

    • @duckymomo7935
      @duckymomo7935 5 років тому

      Czeckie
      Integral domain over a ring R or integral vector field over the ring of polynomials?

    • @Czeckie
      @Czeckie 5 років тому +1

      take your pick :) but I was thinking about integral element over a ring, which is a generalization of algebraic integer from algebraic number theory.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  5 років тому +3

      Wow, I was making a pun on rings, but I did not expect a pun on integrals, wow!!!

  • @weerman44
    @weerman44 5 років тому +1

    Love these calculus problems! :D

  • @rafaellisboa8493
    @rafaellisboa8493 5 років тому

    math chillax session, that's what i wanted to hear m8

  • @plaustrarius
    @plaustrarius 5 років тому +2

    Its so satisfying to see all of the terms cancel out haha its like some perfect algebraic balance!

    • @NoNTr1v1aL
      @NoNTr1v1aL 5 років тому +1

      Did u know? Algebra literally means balance!

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  5 років тому

      ^ I had no idea! :O

    • @NoNTr1v1aL
      @NoNTr1v1aL 5 років тому +1

      @@drpeyam wait I'm wrong. It actually means to reunite or restore. I don't remember where I heard balance lol.

    • @plaustrarius
      @plaustrarius 5 років тому

      @@NoNTr1v1aL I love that still, it calls to mind the idea of 'the sand reckoner'; algebra is an accounting tool to 'rectify' the numbers and our errors in estimation.
      I can see how restore or reunite could translate to balance, if a situation is unfair you balance, rectify, or restore it to fairness.
      Oftentimes in algebra in a way you are 'reuniting' seemingly different information to come to a common idea.
      Thanks for the info! I've never studied a language that wasn't based in latin haha

    • @NoNTr1v1aL
      @NoNTr1v1aL 5 років тому

      @@plaustrarius yeah I think the idea of fairness did lead me to think of the word 'balance'.

  • @MrRyanroberson1
    @MrRyanroberson1 5 років тому

    I wonder if we should make an inequality notation for comparing the radii of polar numbers? Or at least the understanding that "this < assumes the left and right are absolute values". An interesting difference to normal comparators is that the identity x

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  5 років тому

      See my video on comparing complex numbers :)

  • @swaree
    @swaree 5 років тому

    This man is so happy lol

  • @mipmip4575
    @mipmip4575 5 років тому

    Fantastic :)

  • @HilbertXVI
    @HilbertXVI 5 років тому

    That is amazing lol

  • @faizanurrehman6220
    @faizanurrehman6220 5 років тому

    Dr. peyam's please make video on convergence of sequence,series and function.I'm little bit confused what is exact means of this.

  • @masheroz
    @masheroz 5 років тому

    What would the answer look like in the general case where the ring is centered at some arbitrary point and the same initial function is centered at some other point?

    • @masheroz
      @masheroz 5 років тому

      1/sqrt(x^2 + y^2) is centred at (0,0). The ring, a^2

    • @masheroz
      @masheroz 5 років тому

      Patrick Salhany I know it gets more complicated, hence my question.

  • @louisferreira1012
    @louisferreira1012 4 роки тому

    could you please do some examples where the circles aren't centered at the origin and when there isn't any nice symmetry that can be abused? lol thanks, great vid!

  • @sansamman4619
    @sansamman4619 5 років тому

    i am beginning to realize that, multivariable calculus is easier than normal calculus!

    • @HilbertXVI
      @HilbertXVI 5 років тому +1

      Um that's because this is kinda an easy problem which is *made* to be completely simplified in the end.
      Not saying it's not elegant, but it's far from conventional multivariable calc problems.

    • @sansamman4619
      @sansamman4619 5 років тому

      Hilbert Black, you are completely right, but what i meant is when you try solving some problems with single variable calculus ( if possible ) it gets pretty difficult when you try to solve single variable calc. problems with multivariable calc. it is usually easy

  • @giovannimariotte4993
    @giovannimariotte4993 4 роки тому

    Savage

  • @eliyasne9695
    @eliyasne9695 4 роки тому

    But what if the ring is not centered around (0,0) ?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому

      You would shift the ring until it’s centered at (0,0)

  • @AndDiracisHisProphet
    @AndDiracisHisProphet 5 років тому

    0:35 -boy- boi, in my first LA class in rthe beginning this confused me soooo hard. Also, what is a "Körper"? Something like a cone?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  5 років тому

      Körper? I think it’s the German word for Field!

    • @AndDiracisHisProphet
      @AndDiracisHisProphet 5 років тому

      yes. But it is also the german word for 3d geometric shapes.

    • @koenth2359
      @koenth2359 5 років тому

      @@AndDiracisHisProphet ... and also for body (zB in 'Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper')

    • @AndDiracisHisProphet
      @AndDiracisHisProphet 5 років тому

      ja, aber Körper für body ist ja eher im biologischen sinne gesehen, während die Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper eher feste Objekte sind.

    • @koenth2359
      @koenth2359 5 років тому

      @@AndDiracisHisProphet True, but not exclusively, as in 'free body diagram' for any object. (B.t.w. Is german your mother tongue, or are you just good at languages?)

  • @JorgetePanete
    @JorgetePanete 5 років тому

    is a disk a filled circle?

    • @JorgetePanete
      @JorgetePanete 5 років тому

      @Patrick Salhany locus? i understood the rest, thanks

  • @arnabkarak3927
    @arnabkarak3927 5 років тому

    👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻

  • @yellowman_goes_wild
    @yellowman_goes_wild 2 роки тому

    the guy seems high lol

  • @dhunt6618
    @dhunt6618 5 років тому

    you pwned me on this one - from the title, I thought the answer about the average value of an annulus was the origin, since it was symmetric around the origin... grrr

  • @davide467
    @davide467 5 років тому

    Top

  • @helloitsme7553
    @helloitsme7553 5 років тому

    I prefer 1/average r

  • @PackSciences
    @PackSciences 5 років тому

    I don't think integrating 1/r is very interesting tbh, maybe something harder?