If you throw dice an infinite number of times, eventually you'll get all 6s a thousand times in a row. The dice rolls are random, but this "order" could still be formed. Anyone saying "you can't get order from chaos" is flat-out wrong.
Anti Theist Words like _random, order and chaos_ are quite misleading, just like concepts like _free will, choice,_ etc. From our perspective things seem random and chaotic and we seem to have free will, but the roll of the die is determined by everything that went before it that has a causal relation connecting to the die. It's just that we don't have full information of every quantum state and their effect on everything else. In theory, if you could measure all quantum states of a cigarette and the particles in the visible universe around it without affecting them, you could predict exactly how the turbulence of the smoke moves and what it looks like, but we're a part of this universe, so we can't. We'll have to settle for inaccurate models and simulations and averages and chance calculations. Which also give us the sensation of free will, but we never had it and never will. We have the illusion of free will because we are limited in our knowledge and it's not physically possible to have full knowledge. We will have to make do with repeating patterns and making educated guesses, which also gives us a good reason to hold ourselves and others accountable because wild ass guesses shouldn't be treated as equal to or better than educated ones like religion treats them and we are demonstrably better off basing our decisions and hypotheses on actual knowledge instead of made up nonsense. Knowledge = freedom. The more you have of it, the more free you are to make decisions. But from the perspective of the universe, there is no order nor chaos and there is no freedom. Those are just our perception of patterns in a particular system we look at. If you look at a grain of sand, the molecules seem ordered, look at a handful and it's chaos, look at the beach, it's ordered, look at the planet and the sand seems random, look at the solar system and it's ordered, the universe and it's chaotic again, but every one of those is structured by the same causal effects and the same physics. The universe just is. The rest is perception.
@@jacksonheathen2092 I felt the same way. The student seems to be a willing conspirator, possibly a shill to draw a crowd. Notice the lack of crowd, however.
Someone who understands sounds wave propagation, and understands the curvature, and discovered a way to send vocal cord vibrations further XD its just that as normal, flerfers don't understand the science behind it, and use it wrong XD
We wrote the laws of Mathematics out to understand why they even exist. There’s something called a book. Dunno is this preacher has ever heard of one though...
Flat earthers LOVE god over a religious conspiracy. Reality vs. Fantasy, which do they choose? Fantasy, mainly. By why try and meld fantasy and reality to make it look like 1 reality and not 2? Yeah, that is how dumb they are! Fantasy is made up, while real-time reality is true reality. Both fantasy and reality do not meld and connect to each other, unless you a little child and love fantasy! Yes, we have a Paralell world that runs through ours, but we do not see it and it does not see us! Those religious fantasy believers think "you can see heaven and heaven can see you!", when that is pure fantasy, not reality. It is a matter of how dumb someone is...
I would not be surprised considering this happened in Georgia. I recognize the campus as that of UGA’s. Where they are is about a 15 minute walk from churches of various Christian denominations.
God is about belief. Why are you guys bothered by the fact that I feel good about believing in a God? It makes me feel better about life and makes me happy, leave me alone.
thotheface, Few atheists care what you believe. That’s why nobody is forcing you to watch this video. We are leaving you alone - you’re the one forcing this upon yourself. Please don’t blame others for your actions.
@@thotheface I'm pretty sure most atheists only care if people state it as fact or use god to spread misinform, like the flat Earth. Pretty much other than that they probably don't care
@@guytheincognito4186 oh believe me, I know! I just love to argue with them until I hear the words "NASA is all CGI", "you're suffering from cognitive dissonance", and "gravity isn't real". Soon as I hear one of the above, my job is done.
He asked "who wrote those laws" and the dude with the backpack is absolutely correct. It doesn't mean those laws didn't exist before man wrote them down. But it is man that put those laws of physics and their effects into words.
Numbers are simply labels we use to describe natural phenomena. "I have a rock, I have another rock, now I have two rocks." Counting is resultant of this behavior, and addition is resultant of repeated counting, etcetera. Those laws were inherent until the 1800s when there was a logical crisis in which we needed some very strictly defined laws: Namely, axioms. Axioms are simply the laws that govern how a system works, and the math that we are acquainted is a result of those axioms. So with this in mind, I would like to change the question: Who made logic? I'd argue that logic is not created in the same way maths is, but rather, it is simply inherent in the universe. You cannot have an item that simultaneously is and is not itself.
Because religion needs an escape from the ever growing presence of science. If you jump into the mathematical, this would be one way to escape. However, us mathematicians require far more rigor than science, so they're doomed.
@@JM-us3fr I absolutely don't see why religion and science can't go together. Science can't answer questions like if God exists, what happens after death, etc. I think that's the point of religion? It's not meant to answer scientific questions...
@@54-geo Well if most religions made only abstract claims, then that would be absolutely fine; science and religion could live side by side, science answering the physical and religion answering the abstract (to classify spiritual phenomena as nonphysical, they would need to be abstract). However, we already have a field that rigorously answers the abstract questions, and that's mathematics. Now religion could try to become a subfield of mathematics, but that would mean they would need FAR more rigor than they typically display, so it's highly unlikely they would (or could) go that route. The day an apologist makes a fully formal argument (definitions, axioms, theorems, etc) is the day I will take their argument seriously. Unfortunately, they seem incapable of doing this. It's certainly possible (just look at Kurt Godel's ontological argument), but such arguments are rarely convincing because they don't connect to useful concepts and don't seem to reflect the typically associated properties of a divine being. Furthermore, it's pretty black and white that religions DO make many scientific claims. Any physical claim is a claim that can be tested with science, since science studies the physical. On issues where science can't prove something due to lack of evidence, the default position should not be to believe, but to reframe from belief.
@@JM-us3fr I guess it's up to the individual. I'm a christian and people seem to think that being religious means believing everything in the Bible, which is obviously not true as it would be plain ignorance. You can't say that we know the answers to ALL questions. Religion is there to satisfy us with answers until we reach the actual explanations with science. The Bible is 2000 years old and people didn't know much then, of course it is to be taken with a pinch of salt. Flat earthers are a good example of religious fanatics when it comes to christianity but saying that we all believe the world is flat is like saying all muslims are terrorists
I feel you Stick...being violated brings the worse out of people. My new year's resolution is quit smoking tobacco, I've already started a week before new year, but still. I encourage every smoker to join me, I'm vaping without nicotine, although I'd eventually like to quit vaping too. I wasn't a chain smoker, so I was never really addicted and I've got no abstinence symptoms, lucky me. I'd also say seeing more Stick vids, but I already watch them all...so that would depend on you ^^
@@professorstick Thanks for the cheering Stick, I wish you the best this year and that you gain loads of subscribers, this has become one of my favourite channels, you deserve it.
My NY resolution this year is to get my guardianship back. In 2009 I was in a car wreck and because of that, I’m not my own guardian anymore. That’s gonna change this year!
@@Chris-hx3om It's your Dad I'm looking for.....if your Dad is Douglas. If not, and your Dad is Bryan or Gerry then I'm not sure if he'll know why 42 is the answer.
I don’t usually watch these types of videos but i always find my self searching for Professor Stick because i love your commentating and you logic. Keep up the good work. Also i May or may not have genuinely laughed at the Last Year joke...
The only creator that can be proven real is a content creator because they give physical evidence of existence and directly communicate to the masses, unlike god who thinks books are an appropriate form of communication with the occasional bullsht of having only a select few "see" him despite saying all his "children" are equal.
Cats and dogs share an MRCS in carnivora with a division that traces back to about 43 million years ago; caniformia and feliformia from carnivora. I'm not really sure what that does for the cat vs dog argument.. I just happen to find that interesting 😁
how to drive a Tardis? gatekeeping, what a great person you are! I’m disgusted you like this channel and *especially* disgusted you like Doctor Who, wow, anti furry gatekeepers are cancerous.
Subscribed! Not sure how many subs you had when this video was uploaded, but it says "173K" on the button now. Assuming a flat 173,000 subs, that's 69.2% of the way there! Only 30.8% left!
My resolutions are 1. Control my depression 2. Get a date 3. Get to a healthy weight to prevent my predisposition to diabetes and heart disease taking me like my parents. 4. Start my UA-cam channel
Reduce my sugar levels. Actually, objective reality ultimately writes the laws. In the case of mathematics, mathematics is simply a specialized field of logic. Numbers have the relationships they do to each other in logical reality, because of how they are defined.
You know what's funny? I'm a Catholic. I don't know if were I was raised the priests were different from the rest of the world, but not a single one of them believed the creationist theory. They used to say that when reading the Bible, you have to account to WHEN it was written, you can't just take everything as a fact. Using religion to justify distorting science is just dumb.
Heck the human creator, the jokes were great, DOWN WITH YOU HUMAN AND UP WITH THE STICK KIND, stick figures best kind, muaaaaaa Edit this is the most likes I ever gotten thank you Nice video btw
I've been subbed to you since pretty much the very beginning, you even made a video on 1 of my suggestions, lets hope you make 500,000 subs by the end of the year
I just looked back, you posted my suggestion in march of 2017, so almost 2 years, wow, it's been a long, great journey ua-cam.com/video/fE0HJqxzG08/v-deo.html
My New Year's resolution: I want to convince my friend to GET OFF HIS COMPUTER. I had never done it before, and I fainted in shock when I accomplished this two weeks ago.
I just accidently deleted my comment that got a heart... I meant to edit it... w h a t t h e f u c k i t h a d a h e a r t edit: my new years resolution is to get a heart on every comment i post on your videos
@@tarmairon431 maths is just the language of physics, WHICH IS A SCIENCE. It does make claims about reality if it proves science. Maths is also natural! We have just devised a system of noting it
This is an example of my favorite quote from Tao-te Ching, “Those who tell, do not know. Those who know, do not tell.” In this case, he keeps telling about things he has no understanding of. And those who know, are just not wasting their time on him.
Actually, we don't *really* know if the universe has constants. It surely seems that way, all experiments we've done up to now point us to that direction, but we're confined to a very small slice of spacetime by cosmic standards so it _might_ be possible that at different places or different times, the laws of physics might be different. But until we find otherwise, we assume they are constants because it works, and because it's simpler. It doesn't matter _why_, it just is that way. Math is different, math is not something that's observed, math is something we created, and we created it to be constant. Is not that we have to observe constantly that 2+2=4 in case it changed, it can't change, because the _definition_ of addition lets us prove it without making a single observation, using only basic axioms (which are the base of the definition). The relationship between maths and physics comes later, and while physics might change or not conform to the math, the math is still constant and correct in and of itself.
if the physical laws were different we wouldnt be here to ask the stupid question of why they are as they are. also random chance and time explains the "why" so why dont these idiots rather thry to understand what the laws are and how they work? thats a way better use of so much free time.
@@uteriel282 We literally don't know if other physical laws could have resulted in intelligent life. It would be quite different and we as in you and I would not be here for sure, but a different set of individuals might be somewhere asking questions instead. Also, asking why is in our nature. The quest for why is the reason we understand so much of the universe right now. The problem is when people see a gap and jump to answer with god without justification.
@@Dani0x1B even if intelligent life would exist if the physical laws were different its still stupid to ask why the laws are the way they are. maybe when this universe is gone another one will form with different laws but the end result is still the same. the universe exist the way it does because it had to happen sooner or later. thats why scientists dont ask why the laws arent different and instead ask how thes existing laws impact the things around us.
@@uteriel282 the core principle of science is asking why, and that is with regards to e v e r y t h i n g, so it is very much in the interest of science to ask why our universe's laws are like they are. just imagine, if we solved that mystery, we would have discovered which processes lead to the creation of a universe if that isn't scientific, nothing is
Great video, Professor Stick. It sounded like those two were working together. Hmm. Resolution? I made my last one in the early 90's. It was... Never make new years resolutions, then fail and feel awful! So, be happy!! And 250k by 2020? You should 'see' that perfectly! So, be happy and have pun! Love and Peace
As both a Christian and a mathematician, all I have to say is, "What?" Proving God is a meaningless task, a God that can be proved empirically wouldn't be much of a God. Yes, I see things that I interpret as evidence of God, but I also understand that you, or anyone, may interpret them some other way. You know what? I am okay with that. Also, why do I feel like his one person "crowd" is working with him?
I feel the same, at a job I had my boss caught me off guard with the whole why are you an atheist debate. I had just come off a weekend working 24 hours straight for an event and then some, 5pm on a Friday to like 10pm on a Saturday, with about 4 hours to sleep during between events, if I could. Then some sleep till my Sunday shift to run said event a third time, end of the day I wanted to go and not have this debate with a lack of sleep. I know this pain all to well.
My new year's resolutions are: To beat someone up. Drive drunk. Learn to make bombs. I have to admit thus far I've failed to meet any of these. I usually don't do any of the things I put on my resolution list.
Stick! love your vids! thank you for sacrificing your sanity for our education and entertainment :) YES KITTENS!!!! resolution: learning more about different types of woo by studying claims and scientific studies to counter them (it helps with practicing research too and reading speed [because dyslexia], doing about Homeopathy in January and probably things like aura and crystals later on this year) cheers! yes, it felt like 2018 was just a few days ago... XD
Resolutions: ~ Finish some arts & crafts projects ~ Get some solid progress on that novel I'll finish some day ~ Healthy lifestyle changes, mostly regarding sleep & making introvert time ~ Get at least a partial escape from my woo career [got ideas at least] ~ Set people straight about their condescending ways regarding my & other mental illnesses
As a business major, I explain "micro-" and "macro evolution" to creationists like I do interest. Lets say you have 1 dollar on your bank account, and ever year it gains 1% interest. After one year, you have 1.01 dollars. After two years you have 1.0201 dollars. And after three you have 1.030301 dollars. And after 1000 years, you have almost 21000 dollars. Same change happens over the course of 1000 generations. You cant OBSERVE 1000 years worth of interest, but you damn well can calculate it, and figure out what happens.
@@glados9298 idk it fits with your name though, since it was obvious to me =). As for why it works , 1% is a shift of 2 places, then adding, but this would work for 10% as well sans the 0s, however it will stop earlier then, as soon as 10 for 10% or 100 for 1% is reached, then the numbers start overlapping. The shift creates the second half of each addition in Pascal's triangle while the addition of the original gives the first.
I won New Years back in 2003. "My resolution this year is to never make another resolution." - New Year's Resolution champion longer than Anne Frank was the hide and seek champion.
These are the same people that say if the bible said 2+2=5, they would believe it.
At one point in can be interpreted to say that pi equals 3 (through doing the math on the dimensions of a basin)
Old Scratch - that was actually Big Brother in 1984 but I know what you mean, metaphor.
Old Scratch you've obviously neve beard of the old mathematicians joke: 2+2=5 is correct for large values of 2.
Cosmic Rift there are enough contradictions in the bible that one more wouldn't be a problem.
They already believe that 1+1+1=1.
If you throw dice an infinite number of times, eventually you'll get all 6s a thousand times in a row.
The dice rolls are random, but this "order" could still be formed.
Anyone saying "you can't get order from chaos" is flat-out wrong.
"flat-out wrong" 😂😂
@@user-zv8qg1co4z How do we know this hasn;t happend over and over and over again the big crunch then big bang etc...
Robert W right we don’t and probably won’t ever
@Optimus27 they use false dichotomies all the time like either you are with us or your of the DEVIL the nature of duality
Anti Theist Words like _random, order and chaos_ are quite misleading, just like concepts like _free will, choice,_ etc.
From our perspective things seem random and chaotic and we seem to have free will, but the roll of the die is determined by everything that went before it that has a causal relation connecting to the die. It's just that we don't have full information of every quantum state and their effect on everything else. In theory, if you could measure all quantum states of a cigarette and the particles in the visible universe around it without affecting them, you could predict exactly how the turbulence of the smoke moves and what it looks like, but we're a part of this universe, so we can't. We'll have to settle for inaccurate models and simulations and averages and chance calculations.
Which also give us the sensation of free will, but we never had it and never will. We have the illusion of free will because we are limited in our knowledge and it's not physically possible to have full knowledge. We will have to make do with repeating patterns and making educated guesses, which also gives us a good reason to hold ourselves and others accountable because wild ass guesses shouldn't be treated as equal to or better than educated ones like religion treats them and we are demonstrably better off basing our decisions and hypotheses on actual knowledge instead of made up nonsense. Knowledge = freedom. The more you have of it, the more free you are to make decisions.
But from the perspective of the universe, there is no order nor chaos and there is no freedom. Those are just our perception of patterns in a particular system we look at. If you look at a grain of sand, the molecules seem ordered, look at a handful and it's chaos, look at the beach, it's ordered, look at the planet and the sand seems random, look at the solar system and it's ordered, the universe and it's chaotic again, but every one of those is structured by the same causal effects and the same physics. The universe just is. The rest is perception.
Who decided two people need microphones to speak to each other?
Haha probably to get proper voice recording in for the video
I thought of that too. But it's pretty obvious that this is all rehearsed & scripted.
@@jacksonheathen2092 I felt the same way. The student seems to be a willing conspirator, possibly a shill to draw a crowd. Notice the lack of crowd, however.
Someone who understands sounds wave propagation, and understands the curvature, and discovered a way to send vocal cord vibrations further XD its just that as normal, flerfers don't understand the science behind it, and use it wrong XD
@@IAmAlgolei He's probably not even a student. He probably came there with Todd Friel.
I believe in millimetres, but kilometres is just going to far for me.
Did you just...?
@@pottaishi8679 he did just
smugb 😳 But surely you mean ‘TOO’ ...................far?
We have observed millimeters, but we have not observed kilometers.
Have you ever SEEN a millimeter become a kilometer???
"Why is math always perfect?"
Me: because we designed it that way.
"Who wrote the laws for math?"
Me: We did.
its like they cant comprehend that humans could create a system that helps them to understand the world around them.
We wrote the laws of Mathematics out to understand why they even exist. There’s something called a book.
Dunno is this preacher has ever heard of one though...
If we "designed" math that way, why can't we make 2+2=5?
Maths is not perfect. Come back we have an explanation of 0/0.
@@1Hol1Tiger you can. Redefine the + operator
Flat Earthers HATE math. Ergo..... Flat Earthers HATE god.
That was easy...
Logic!
Ladys and gentalmen, we got'em
Flat earthers LOVE god over a religious conspiracy. Reality vs. Fantasy, which do they choose? Fantasy, mainly. By why try and meld fantasy and reality to make it look like 1 reality and not 2? Yeah, that is how dumb they are! Fantasy is made up, while real-time reality is true reality. Both fantasy and reality do not meld and connect to each other, unless you a little child and love fantasy! Yes, we have a Paralell world that runs through ours, but we do not see it and it does not see us! Those religious fantasy believers think "you can see heaven and heaven can see you!", when that is pure fantasy, not reality. It is a matter of how dumb someone is...
This 👏 hurts 👏 my 👏 nonexistent 👏 soul 👏
Oh 👏 please 👏 stop 👏 the 👏 pain 👏
Ain't afraid of no ghost (Ghostbusters theme song starts to play)
@G V Oh shit, I just turned it off and that worked
Just to be on the safe side, I have several written contracts for other people's souls.. so if I am wrong I have the ability to barter.
Ayri oh good I’m not the only one without a soul,but somehow it hurts so GODDAMM MUCH WITH THEESE STUPID PEOPLE
My resolution
1:Nothing
2:Nothing
3:Nothing
4:Nothing
5:Nothing
Nice to see you've already completed all of them!
Wait, you were thanos snapped!!!1!!1!!
6:Jerk it more
1: Gain 50 subs on UA-cam.
2: Pass my Black Belt phase 1 test.
3: Nothing...
4: Still nothing...
5: *Shrugs*
My resolution.
720p
“share them in the description below”
lol
I was about to write that myself lol
tbh i said that in one of my early videos
*Soviet anthem intensifies*
LaGG335 SBD3 YUS
Fish became fish with legs, than humans.......I THINK HE SKIPPED SOME STEPS!
more like he jumped from the start line all the way to the goal.
Aren't there a good few steps between fish and fish with functional legs?
Pff fuck those steps totally overrated.
You could make a good Animation out of this.
*badum tss*
nope he completely butchered it
My new year resolution is to watch more Professor Stick.
Forhago you're the first
best resolution yet
How is this from 18 hours ago?
Applesong -iscool patreon
Same, as well as finding the meaning of life.
From the moment the guy said he believed in microevolution I assumed the entire thing was staged. Preacher and choir working the crowd.
What crowd? I see no one other than those two goons.
@@apackofhoboes
it was probably staged just for the video.
most "normal" people know to avoid lunatics like that preacher.
I would not be surprised considering this happened in Georgia. I recognize the campus as that of UGA’s. Where they are is about a 15 minute walk from churches of various Christian denominations.
I feel that exact way, I hate watching street-preacher conversations with people who aren't familiar with Creationist tactics.
Religion=fantasy. Just remember how foolish they choose religion to be little children believing in fantasy and not reality...
I really want to get into such a conversation and just push them into the ground using SCIENCE
Meth Proves God
God is about belief. Why are you guys bothered by the fact that I feel good about believing in a God? It makes me feel better about life and makes me happy, leave me alone.
Meth proves god
thotheface, Few atheists care what you believe. That’s why nobody is forcing you to watch this video. We are leaving you alone - you’re the one forcing this upon yourself.
Please don’t blame others for your actions.
@@thotheface I'm pretty sure most atheists only care if people state it as fact or use god to spread misinform, like the flat Earth. Pretty much other than that they probably don't care
@@connoradams3318 NO THATS WRONG!
My New Year's Resolution is to debunk every Flat Earther I come across
As if they haven't debunked themselves.
Lets burn the world and see how the smoke goes to prove the earth is a baseball diamond
Take care while doing so though, no one should force that kind of mental atrophy upon themselves for extended periods. 👍😜
@@guytheincognito4186 oh believe me, I know! I just love to argue with them until I hear the words "NASA is all CGI", "you're suffering from cognitive dissonance", and "gravity isn't real". Soon as I hear one of the above, my job is done.
@@sahidmerced2542
👍😁👌
"Who made those laws?" --- Moron #`1
"Man did." --- Moron #2
@Optimus27 ; Indeed, i suppose the cultist just assumed that laws of nature require a "who." LOL. Spooky how cultists "think." Sad also.
He asked "who wrote those laws" and the dude with the backpack is absolutely correct. It doesn't mean those laws didn't exist before man wrote them down. But it is man that put those laws of physics and their effects into words.
Desertphile the question was who WROTE those laws... And the answer isn't wrong, man did write the laws down on paper, noone else bothered to. ;-)
Numbers are simply labels we use to describe natural phenomena. "I have a rock, I have another rock, now I have two rocks." Counting is resultant of this behavior, and addition is resultant of repeated counting, etcetera. Those laws were inherent until the 1800s when there was a logical crisis in which we needed some very strictly defined laws: Namely, axioms. Axioms are simply the laws that govern how a system works, and the math that we are acquainted is a result of those axioms. So with this in mind, I would like to change the question: Who made logic? I'd argue that logic is not created in the same way maths is, but rather, it is simply inherent in the universe. You cannot have an item that simultaneously is and is not itself.
And I can't get enough of your gravity rant. ;)
How can anyone think that is possible?
Bil ceifer teh dorito Bill you’re drunk go back to uncle Stans head
Because religion needs an escape from the ever growing presence of science. If you jump into the mathematical, this would be one way to escape. However, us mathematicians require far more rigor than science, so they're doomed.
@@JM-us3fr I absolutely don't see why religion and science can't go together. Science can't answer questions like if God exists, what happens after death, etc. I think that's the point of religion? It's not meant to answer scientific questions...
@@54-geo Well if most religions made only abstract claims, then that would be absolutely fine; science and religion could live side by side, science answering the physical and religion answering the abstract (to classify spiritual phenomena as nonphysical, they would need to be abstract).
However, we already have a field that rigorously answers the abstract questions, and that's mathematics. Now religion could try to become a subfield of mathematics, but that would mean they would need FAR more rigor than they typically display, so it's highly unlikely they would (or could) go that route.
The day an apologist makes a fully formal argument (definitions, axioms, theorems, etc) is the day I will take their argument seriously. Unfortunately, they seem incapable of doing this. It's certainly possible (just look at Kurt Godel's ontological argument), but such arguments are rarely convincing because they don't connect to useful concepts and don't seem to reflect the typically associated properties of a divine being.
Furthermore, it's pretty black and white that religions DO make many scientific claims. Any physical claim is a claim that can be tested with science, since science studies the physical. On issues where science can't prove something due to lack of evidence, the default position should not be to believe, but to reframe from belief.
@@JM-us3fr I guess it's up to the individual. I'm a christian and people seem to think that being religious means believing everything in the Bible, which is obviously not true as it would be plain ignorance. You can't say that we know the answers to ALL questions. Religion is there to satisfy us with answers until we reach the actual explanations with science. The Bible is 2000 years old and people didn't know much then, of course it is to be taken with a pinch of salt. Flat earthers are a good example of religious fanatics when it comes to christianity but saying that we all believe the world is flat is like saying all muslims are terrorists
I feel you Stick...being violated brings the worse out of people.
My new year's resolution is quit smoking tobacco, I've already started a week before new year, but still. I encourage every smoker to join me, I'm vaping without nicotine, although I'd eventually like to quit vaping too. I wasn't a chain smoker, so I was never really addicted and I've got no abstinence symptoms, lucky me.
I'd also say seeing more Stick vids, but I already watch them all...so that would depend on you ^^
Nice. I'm glad to see hear you are making progress. That's a resolution worth completing!
@@professorstick Thanks for the cheering Stick, I wish you the best this year and that you gain loads of subscribers, this has become one of my favourite channels, you deserve it.
My NY resolution this year is to get my guardianship back. In 2009 I was in a car wreck and because of that, I’m not my own guardian anymore. That’s gonna change this year!
My resolution was totry not to laugh at flat earthers.
I lost within 2 hours.
@John Paterson 🤣
Lasted longer than me, I’ll give you that
What's 2+2?
*God*
Praise 4 !!
No. 4 x 10 + 2 = God
If you get the reference. You get a cookie.
@@MrSuperbeast92 I'll call Mr Adams and see if he can help me.
@@ianmacfarlane1241 Hi, I'm Mr Adams, how can I help?
@@Chris-hx3om It's your Dad I'm looking for.....if your Dad is Douglas.
If not, and your Dad is Bryan or Gerry then I'm not sure if he'll know why 42 is the answer.
I don’t usually watch these types of videos but i always find my self searching for Professor Stick because i love your commentating and you logic. Keep up the good work.
Also i May or may not have genuinely laughed at the Last Year joke...
My resolution is to survive. It's a fair enough goal for the year.
@John Paterson You're an artist? I always need to meet more of those.
Hey man, December’s around the corner, you still alive? If so, congrats on achieving your resolution
If not
Better luck next year
You simple fool. If only you knew
*laughs in 2020*
This comment is not aging well
humans are evolution type but stick figures are created :O
You can tell they're artificially manufactured because they don't have melanin 👏
The only creator that can be proven real is a content creator because they give physical evidence of existence and directly communicate to the masses, unlike god who thinks books are an appropriate form of communication with the occasional bullsht of having only a select few "see" him despite saying all his "children" are equal.
Resolution: beat Magnus Carlsen at chess.
The 5 years old version of him from his app i mean.
That feeling you cant even beat age 9.
I beat the 13 year old any day
Beat him at chess or at the hairstyle department?
@@marcocappelli2236 chess
@@ailderwitha5591 age 9 still gifts you material, it's age 12 that gives me nightmares
I wonder if Professor Stick likes cats.
More than dogs.
@@professorstick ironic that a stickman doesn't prefer dogs ;)
Cats > dogs all day.
Cats and dogs share an MRCS in carnivora with a division that traces back to about 43 million years ago; caniformia and feliformia from carnivora. I'm not really sure what that does for the cat vs dog argument.. I just happen to find that interesting 😁
@@fgvcosmic6752 not surprising, though; all that fetching might get old after a while...
I just got the notification and some how there is a comment from 18 hours ago..
Trippy.
He is a member to become a member to see it before us press the join button and throw 5 pounds at the phone trust me works every time.
they must have been travelling e x t r e m e l y slowly
My New Years Resolution is to think of a New Years Resolution next years
My New Year's Resolution is The Earth is Round.
@@BryanMullinsTheFox you moaron it's a triangle duuuuh
Idiots, idiots, idiots! Minecraft long ago proved the world a cube.
Awesome video, Professor.
Thanks!
@@professorstick No problem.
how to drive a Tardis?
gatekeeping, what a great person you are!
I’m disgusted you like this channel and *especially* disgusted you like Doctor Who, wow, anti furry gatekeepers are cancerous.
If math is in every universe does that mean that god is in every universe???????
I think not
math > god
@@sensei9767 logic > god
I mean, that's the idea of God. It's like Grand Zeno from Dragon Ball Super
But is there one god that can travel in the multiverse or is there a god for every single universe???
@John Myers IDK i don't believe in god
"The only micro here, is the microwave I will shove your head into"
-Professor Stick 2019
Every year fells the same . I don't think we need to celebrate it , we need to survive it
Yeah the earth going around the sun once isn't really worth celebrating if you think about it.
@@professorstick yeah . Ill try to not get hit by a car this year
Subscribed! Not sure how many subs you had when this video was uploaded, but it says "173K" on the button now. Assuming a flat 173,000 subs, that's 69.2% of the way there! Only 30.8% left!
This makes me furious, using the thing completely unrelated to theism to "prove" theist claims...
My resolutions are
1. Control my depression
2. Get a date
3. Get to a healthy weight to prevent my predisposition to diabetes and heart disease taking me like my parents.
4. Start my UA-cam channel
Wait I know how to prove it 7x4x9=GOD!
Surely God is 7x4x15, and not 7x4x9...
XD
The Wonderful Duke Of Beans. Yeah god of the gaps :P
@@randomguy-tg7ok oh shit, you right
Yes, 252 is a very godly number
"here's my premise".. He concludes before getting started...
Reduce my sugar levels.
Actually, objective reality ultimately writes the laws. In the case of mathematics, mathematics is simply a specialized field of logic. Numbers have the relationships they do to each other in logical reality, because of how they are defined.
"You know what really grinds my gears?" hahaha All I could picture is Peter Griffin at that point...
It's hard to believe that it's 2019
And people still think the earth is flat..
I believe the Earth is thicc father
You know what's funny? I'm a Catholic. I don't know if were I was raised the priests were different from the rest of the world, but not a single one of them believed the creationist theory. They used to say that when reading the Bible, you have to account to WHEN it was written, you can't just take everything as a fact.
Using religion to justify distorting science is just dumb.
Many Christians believe in evolution. Just many stupid people who don’t understand
Love your vids. (just commented early because I feel more special now. I hate myself)
Ps.: the first sentence was honest besides cringe
Yaay I got a heart! My life goal is complished!
Thanks
So awkward it's relatable.
"I'm really simple"
Yep that sums up everything,
Heck the human creator, the jokes were great, DOWN WITH YOU HUMAN AND UP WITH THE STICK KIND, stick figures best kind, muaaaaaa
Edit this is the most likes I ever gotten thank you
Nice video btw
YEET
I've been subbed to you since pretty much the very beginning, you even made a video on 1 of my suggestions, lets hope you make 500,000 subs by the end of the year
I just looked back, you posted my suggestion in march of 2017, so almost 2 years, wow, it's been a long, great journey
ua-cam.com/video/fE0HJqxzG08/v-deo.html
Yay my snowy day just got 10x better.
same
I've tried getting this covered by others, thank you for doing this
New year resolution, 1080p
My Resolutions:
1: Don’t create paradoxes.
2: Keep all my New Years Resolutions.
Oh sh*t I failed both!
"Why is it consistent?"
Because science uses metric system, instead of imperial.
"...I'm really simple..." oh we are well aware of that M8!
1:41 leave your New Years resolutions in the *description*
I don’t have one
I love talking to theists. I keep asking “Why” until they get mad.
Also no new year’s resolutions. Just gonna get ripped.
4:11 *Professor Stick has lost his sanity.*
3:03 that dude in the background is like wtf get a room
Lol sticking you full of knowledge and science
148 likes, 81 comments and 50 views! Very noice.
UA-cam go to bed. You're drunk again.
My New Year's resolution:
I want to convince my friend to GET OFF HIS COMPUTER.
I had never done it before, and I fainted in shock when I accomplished this two weeks ago.
I just accidently deleted my comment that got a heart... I meant to edit it...
w h a t t h e f u c k i t h a d a h e a r t
edit: my new years resolution is to get a heart on every comment i post on your videos
Here's a new one.
@@professorstick ty
@@siracha4956Here's another one on top of the other one ♥️
♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ :D
No pineapple on pizza! No! Also, no tomato in fruit salad.
He started off being honest, he said I'm really simple.
Oh my non-existent god! Creationists are so annoying.
Think of a kindle of kittens 😺😺😺
8:41 - "Different people have DNA."
You got me... Different people have DNA. Whatever that means. God must exist.
Maths prove science.
MATHS IS SCIENCE
But are they related?
@@manny0573 *HEY VSAUCE, MICHEAL HERE*
@@epicstimulus282
No. Math is not science, because it does not make claims about reality.
@@tarmairon431 maths is just the language of physics, WHICH IS A SCIENCE. It does make claims about reality if it proves science. Maths is also natural! We have just devised a system of noting it
This is an example of my favorite quote from Tao-te Ching, “Those who tell, do not know. Those who know, do not tell.” In this case, he keeps telling about things he has no understanding of. And those who know, are just not wasting their time on him.
Actually, we don't *really* know if the universe has constants. It surely seems that way, all experiments we've done up to now point us to that direction, but we're confined to a very small slice of spacetime by cosmic standards so it _might_ be possible that at different places or different times, the laws of physics might be different. But until we find otherwise, we assume they are constants because it works, and because it's simpler. It doesn't matter _why_, it just is that way.
Math is different, math is not something that's observed, math is something we created, and we created it to be constant. Is not that we have to observe constantly that 2+2=4 in case it changed, it can't change, because the _definition_ of addition lets us prove it without making a single observation, using only basic axioms (which are the base of the definition). The relationship between maths and physics comes later, and while physics might change or not conform to the math, the math is still constant and correct in and of itself.
if the physical laws were different we wouldnt be here to ask the stupid question of why they are as they are.
also random chance and time explains the "why" so why dont these idiots rather thry to understand what the laws are and how they work?
thats a way better use of so much free time.
@@uteriel282 We literally don't know if other physical laws could have resulted in intelligent life. It would be quite different and we as in you and I would not be here for sure, but a different set of individuals might be somewhere asking questions instead. Also, asking why is in our nature. The quest for why is the reason we understand so much of the universe right now. The problem is when people see a gap and jump to answer with god without justification.
@@Dani0x1B
even if intelligent life would exist if the physical laws were different its still stupid to ask why the laws are the way they are.
maybe when this universe is gone another one will form with different laws but the end result is still the same.
the universe exist the way it does because it had to happen sooner or later.
thats why scientists dont ask why the laws arent different and instead ask how thes existing laws impact the things around us.
@@uteriel282 the core principle of science is asking why, and that is with regards to e v e r y t h i n g, so it is very much in the interest of science to ask why our universe's laws are like they are. just imagine, if we solved that mystery, we would have discovered which processes lead to the creation of a universe
if that isn't scientific, nothing is
Laws of physics count with factors affecting how they work.
i got an ad titled 'why do you believe in God?'
48 views 42 comments and 92 likes... seems legit.
Gr2020ant It must be God
youtube comments prove god?!
Oops, i accidentily pressed the sub button, activated the bell and liked the video. How could that happen? Love your content Professor Stick.
2+2=God
Also god + god = 8.
@Chara doG
@Chara 2
@Chara okay then chara
and here we see prof stick having his first mental breakdown of 2019
7th vie...oh you don’t care
I still think your pretty calm considering the topics you cover, I think I'd be pulling my hair out and screaming by now haha! Good job Stick x
Hi stick
Hello SwordClasher
I didn't know it was possible to beg the question so many times in one speech.
*8 views/36 likes/38 comments* seems legit
Proof of god (jk)
Great video, Professor Stick. It sounded like those two were working together. Hmm. Resolution? I made my last one in the early 90's. It was... Never make new years resolutions, then fail and feel awful! So, be happy!! And 250k by 2020? You should 'see' that perfectly! So, be happy and have pun! Love and Peace
1:42 "in the description" , you already failed in the new year bud.
I bet you will have 400,000 subs by the end of the year you have amazing, scientific episodes
As both a Christian and a mathematician, all I have to say is, "What?" Proving God is a meaningless task, a God that can be proved empirically wouldn't be much of a God. Yes, I see things that I interpret as evidence of God, but I also understand that you, or anyone, may interpret them some other way. You know what? I am okay with that. Also, why do I feel like his one person "crowd" is working with him?
Of course a god whose existence you cannot prove also isn't any kind of god at all.
"I am a simple person," in other news, a clear midday sky is blue.
One day the creationist will conquer the world by making everyone insane
I love this guy at 3:09 in background going like "What?... Yeah, i'm not getting into this shit"
This is THE BEST channel ever
Subscribed
I feel the same, at a job I had my boss caught me off guard with the whole why are you an atheist debate. I had just come off a weekend working 24 hours straight for an event and then some, 5pm on a Friday to like 10pm on a Saturday, with about 4 hours to sleep during between events, if I could. Then some sleep till my Sunday shift to run said event a third time, end of the day I wanted to go and not have this debate with a lack of sleep. I know this pain all to well.
Yes, you really need to start sticking up for yourself! Good luck with the 250k target.
My new year's resolutions are: To beat someone up. Drive drunk. Learn to make bombs. I have to admit thus far I've failed to meet any of these. I usually don't do any of the things I put on my resolution list.
Stick! love your vids! thank you for sacrificing your sanity for our education and entertainment :)
YES KITTENS!!!!
resolution: learning more about different types of woo by studying claims and scientific studies to counter them (it helps with practicing research too and reading speed [because dyslexia], doing about Homeopathy in January and probably things like aura and crystals later on this year)
cheers!
yes, it felt like 2018 was just a few days ago... XD
Resolutions:
~ Finish some arts & crafts projects
~ Get some solid progress on that novel I'll finish some day
~ Healthy lifestyle changes, mostly regarding sleep & making introvert time
~ Get at least a partial escape from my woo career [got ideas at least]
~ Set people straight about their condescending ways regarding my & other mental illnesses
Happy new year Professor Stick
Oh god, it's an argument between 2 wrong people!
- But what is that answer that God is giving?
- The answer is God.
- Yes, but what is the answer that he is actually giving?
- Gogogogod.
As a business major, I explain "micro-" and "macro evolution" to creationists like I do interest. Lets say you have 1 dollar on your bank account, and ever year it gains 1% interest. After one year, you have 1.01 dollars. After two years you have 1.0201 dollars. And after three you have 1.030301 dollars. And after 1000 years, you have almost 21000 dollars. Same change happens over the course of 1000 generations. You cant OBSERVE 1000 years worth of interest, but you damn well can calculate it, and figure out what happens.
Yay Pascal's triangle
@@willowarkan2263 how is Pascal triangle related to this?
@@glados9298 look at the non 0 numbers in that sequence:
1
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1 (if you continue to add 1%)
1 4 6 4 1 (and so on)
@@willowarkan2263 holy shit how did I not see this. Nownim trying to understand why and how this happens
@@glados9298 idk it fits with your name though, since it was obvious to me =). As for why it works , 1% is a shift of 2 places, then adding, but this would work for 10% as well sans the 0s, however it will stop earlier then, as soon as 10 for 10% or 100 for 1% is reached, then the numbers start overlapping. The shift creates the second half of each addition in Pascal's triangle while the addition of the original gives the first.
"I believe in microevolution"
I see, so you're a paid actor, gotcha.
It is fucked-up "conversation" when both parties have to use microphones to communicate.
Holy fuck the outdoor microphone forum is awesome...
"I'm in desperate need of subscribers right now..."
Ok fine! I'll subscribe since I've been binging your content for hours....
Shit, I need to make my Megamouth shark a Megathin shark.
My last New Year's Resolution (back in 1999): Don't make any more New Year's Resolutions
It's the only one I've ever managed to keep....
I won New Years back in 2003.
"My resolution this year is to never make another resolution." - New Year's Resolution champion longer than Anne Frank was the hide and seek champion.
7:24 I would of gone with kiss my ass, but apparently Prof. Stick isn’t as far gone as I am.
Here’s my New Years resolution,
1 don’t die
2 stay alive