🟢07 - Gauss-Seidel Iteration Method: Example 1

[@TN-wh3yf]

You are just the best when it comes to this Man. Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😊😊😊😊

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

You are most welcome. Keep watching for more

[@mateobilbao6296]

Man you saved my semester, God bless you

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

Amen
Thanks so so much

[@Favsdata]

Thank you so much for making this so easy and clear

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

You are most welcome

[@stephenatiene3450]

Thanks for making this so easy😊, my maths lecturer just dey make this course look like its so difficult 😢

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

You are most welcome. Keep watching for more

[@nemenlahfreeman4731]

That’s what they do

[@TosinTibeju]

Thank you. You made comprehension easy.

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

Thanks so so much

[@miguelrodriguez-qc2uf]

GREAT EXPLANATION! THANKS A LOT

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

You are most welcome

[@Donya.ss38]

Hi, could you please explain the difference between this method and Jacobi method?

[@brahiminounou2665]

this one is more efficient , it takes less iterations meaning less time

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

That's true, because you update the values every time

[@mancchannel9807]

Why you assume k=2 please anyone answer asap i got exam in like 4 more hours thanks!

[@lilianbotchway6510]

Please do you have the matrix approach for this one ?

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

Not yet sir

[@lilianbotchway6510]

Alright please , but would be looking forward to it .Thank you @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn

[@MyCharm85]

If you followed the Jacobi method for the same problem, should you get the same answer for 2 iterations?

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

No please, this is because.
The 2nd iteration for Jacobi takes the previous values for x1-3.
While the Gauss Seidel takes the updated values in each step to find x1-3

[@MyCharm85]

Makes sense, thank you for the good lesson and feedback. Interested to know if you would get the same answer with enough iterations using different methods

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

@MyCharm85 yes with enough iterations you are likely to get the same answers. But you are likely to arrive at the actual values faster with Gauss-Seidel as compared to Jacobi, since Gauss-Seidel has inputs updated every now and then.

[@abbeyuptown-sd4ry]

Do you teach for the GATE exam sir?

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

Oh no please

[@SameNameasU]

​@@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohnokay lol😅

[@ALIEAKAMARA-gy2vo]

Sir do have video tutorial videos on Applied electricity (D.C)

[@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn]

Yes I do have