No please, this is because. The 2nd iteration for Jacobi takes the previous values for x1-3. While the Gauss Seidel takes the updated values in each step to find x1-3
Makes sense, thank you for the good lesson and feedback. Interested to know if you would get the same answer with enough iterations using different methods
@MyCharm85 yes with enough iterations you are likely to get the same answers. But you are likely to arrive at the actual values faster with Gauss-Seidel as compared to Jacobi, since Gauss-Seidel has inputs updated every now and then.
You are just the best when it comes to this Man. Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😊😊😊😊
You are most welcome. Keep watching for more
Thanks for making this so easy😊, my maths lecturer just dey make this course look like its so difficult 😢
You are most welcome. Keep watching for more
That’s what they do
Man you saved my semester, God bless you
Amen
Thanks so so much
Thank you. You made comprehension easy.
Thanks so so much
Please do you have the matrix approach for this one ?
Not yet sir
Alright please , but would be looking forward to it .Thank you @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
If you followed the Jacobi method for the same problem, should you get the same answer for 2 iterations?
No please, this is because.
The 2nd iteration for Jacobi takes the previous values for x1-3.
While the Gauss Seidel takes the updated values in each step to find x1-3
Makes sense, thank you for the good lesson and feedback. Interested to know if you would get the same answer with enough iterations using different methods
@MyCharm85 yes with enough iterations you are likely to get the same answers. But you are likely to arrive at the actual values faster with Gauss-Seidel as compared to Jacobi, since Gauss-Seidel has inputs updated every now and then.
Sir do have video tutorial videos on Applied electricity (D.C)
Yes I do have
Do you teach for the GATE exam sir?
Oh no please
@@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohnokay lol😅