Su-34 vs Patriot Engagement Audio Breakdown!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024
  • Fighter pilot reacts to audio from a recent Su-34 vs Patriot Missile engagement. Watch the original video here: • Su-34 Narrowly Survive... www.cwlemoine.com
    The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.
    Views presented are my own and do not represent the views of DoD or its Components.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,9 тис.

  • @Scohill
    @Scohill 3 місяці тому +650

    And people still say maneuverability on an aircraft is not as important yea right..dodging 3 patriot missiles with a heavy yet maneuverable BOMBER is enough to justify maneuverability.

    • @yoshimitsu1260
      @yoshimitsu1260 3 місяці тому

      People saying manouvrability doesn't matter anymore are the same people swallowing up the same propaganda which tells such bs because our doctrine was focused in the last two to three decades on "stealth" and BVR. I'm sure that as soon as our doctrine will change (and it's alreadg changing because we have to keep up to Russia and China) our propaganda will tell us something different.
      Sad reality of things is that we live in a little bubble of bs, because manouvrabilities always matter and what still matter is high speed; high speed matters maybe even more than "stealth" in some specific cases.

    • @Sputniksim
      @Sputniksim 3 місяці тому +23

      That's a very ignorant comment by a person who lacks any knowledge of aircraft in general. This is not a heavy bomber but a fighter bomber. Second thing the manouverability you think of, aka airshow manouverability has nothing to do with high speed missile evading which is limited mostly by pilot and machine G limits. In this scenario Su-34 is no different than any other su-27 family jet.

    • @Scohill
      @Scohill 3 місяці тому +113

      @@Sputniksim and a su34 is different than every other su 27 family jet, its slower, heavier and some reports indicate that the airframe can only pull 7 G's as opposed to the 9 of the su 35 for example. This is also reflected in the losses in Ukraine where missile have higher chances of hitting Su34 meanwhile Su35 evade more often. You made so many mistakes in 1 comment that I had to comment twice. Thats crazy.

    • @ФедорФурин
      @ФедорФурин 2 місяці тому +54

      @@Sputniksim The Su-34 is significantly heavier than the Su-27, with an armored body larger than that of the Su-25. It is designed to carry two crew members.

    • @exploringtheplanetsn
      @exploringtheplanetsn 2 місяці тому +6

      @@ScohillNo one says maneuverability isn’t important, but what isn’t important is super maneuverability. The days of pulling sustained g’s in a dogfight are long gone when you consider things like aim-9x exist and will continue to become more maneuverable. And the su-34 isn’t exactly an f-22. Besides that these missiles were at the peak of there range anyways, if the su-34 came close this would have ended differently probably.

  • @et9949
    @et9949 2 місяці тому +1354

    Defending against 3 missiles with a fighter bomber is crazy😮,, Respect to the pilot and radar crew

    • @johnsteiner3417
      @johnsteiner3417 2 місяці тому +10

      If my understanding is correct during the Vietnam [conflict] A-6Bs were expected to wait for two SA missiles to be in the air before launching a shrike to take down the radar.

    • @typicallifeoh4304
      @typicallifeoh4304 2 місяці тому +36

      In Russia first team, that will confirmly shot down f-16 will have 190 000$ bonus from business community.

    • @deadvatniks
      @deadvatniks 2 місяці тому

      The russian terrorist pig will be shot down next time.

    • @johnsteiner3417
      @johnsteiner3417 2 місяці тому +3

      @@typicallifeoh4304 Part in parcel of why the UAF must be judicious in when and where they use their Vipers.

    • @Sirikazy
      @Sirikazy 2 місяці тому +55

      ​@@eminence_ and that show the small brain you have...

  • @krower11
    @krower11 3 місяці тому +701

    Just to clarify. Russian methodology of combat operations with this airplane is to use them only in pair. Since Syria they adopted this strategy. 1. SU-35 which is fully loaded for Air-to-Air combat is flying high up with its radar looking into BVR while the 2. SU-34 carrying the bombs is flying in front and below. The job of the 1. SU-35 is to cover the bomber and to provide him with more detailed information through the altitude advantage he has. Therefore he can also see the missles and tell them.

    • @PlanetWalking-qd8gv
      @PlanetWalking-qd8gv 3 місяці тому +4

      yah right whatever

    • @helvosthecreator1920
      @helvosthecreator1920 2 місяці тому +135

      ​@@PlanetWalking-qd8gv I know nothing about avionics or tactics, but even a dense bloke like knows that they fly in pairs. You can literally find that info in any interview of RU forcess...

    • @digitaldyslexia7589
      @digitaldyslexia7589 2 місяці тому +16

      As a guy that don't really know anything about Russian doctrine or tactics in regards to aviation yes I agree definitely

    • @Sorum777
      @Sorum777 2 місяці тому +13

      In most cases its x2 SU-34 and x1 SU-35

    • @sk11ff
      @sk11ff 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Sorum777 its 34 and MIG i think

  • @adomalyon1
    @adomalyon1 3 місяці тому +868

    Dude evaded 3 patriots in a heavy fighter bomber mad respect to him and the AWACS/Ground crew.

    • @PunkN_JTM
      @PunkN_JTM 2 місяці тому

      Considering the Patriot missile was never designed to take down aircraft it doesn't surprise me at all..
      It's for intercepting ballistic missiles...
      I literally watched one crash into a scud missile directly over our heads in 2003..
      If it wouldn't have been for the Patriot battery, our engineers would have died...
      you need anti-aircraft, Patriots are missile defense.. and it's questionable if they can even handle intercontinentals..
      I think you can Google this information versus taking my word for it I'm just spouting what I know

    • @vladimirpopovic8471
      @vladimirpopovic8471 2 місяці тому +47

      Ураааа! 🇷🇺💪🏻

    • @chargedx5768
      @chargedx5768 2 місяці тому +14

      5 according to new sources

    • @ESB-f3z
      @ESB-f3z 2 місяці тому

      Doesn't matter! They are russians. And you need to stop putting this kind of comments!

    • @ajsis
      @ajsis 2 місяці тому +4

      Yea and imagine how easier is for su 35 to evade this

  • @collinallison283
    @collinallison283 3 місяці тому +555

    Doing that in an SU-34 is seriously impressive

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 2 місяці тому

      I laughed when i heard the ukrainian nonsense that patriots had shot down all the awacs. ... here is an audio clip of awacs aiding an SU-34
      When are people going to learn that nato is waging a full blown propaganda war where lies are mandatory?

    • @m_zbrv3967
      @m_zbrv3967 2 місяці тому +24

      i believe that's the reason SU-34 was made.. to be able to evade dangers

    • @cherrypoptart2001
      @cherrypoptart2001 2 місяці тому

      @@m_zbrv3967 SU-34 is a based of the SU-27 flanker , an aircraft known for its power and agility but the SU-34 is a jet bomber modification , it sacrificed a lot of maneuverability of the flanker for a strengthen airframe to carry more ordinance , remember this aircraft was intended to replace the SU-24, SU-25 and the russians intend for it to replace to their long range bombers to an extent in the future . It's not easy to dodge SAMs, let alone Patriot missiles in such a heavy aircraft , some russian telegrams also reported that this SU-34 did this with a lot of weapons (weight) still under its wings

    • @arturg.j.167
      @arturg.j.167 2 місяці тому +35

      Su-34 is very agile, most modern russian planes are.

    • @Sosyy79
      @Sosyy79 2 місяці тому +10

      Plus it was armed with at least 3 UMPC FAB-500

  • @Gymhumandesk312
    @Gymhumandesk312 3 місяці тому +259

    It was scary, the pilot was saying that he can't see any missile coming at him and the ground control telling him you are being chased by 2 to 3 missiles.

    • @MysticSage-hg3jh
      @MysticSage-hg3jh 2 місяці тому +5

      😢☹😢

    • @Jack_Sparrow17
      @Jack_Sparrow17 20 днів тому +2

      ​@@MysticSage-hg3jh he is ok don't worry

    • @nabihlakkis562
      @nabihlakkis562 10 днів тому +1

      It wasn't ground control, it was another aircraft flying on his tail at a higher level providing overwatch.

  • @IMAN7THRYLOS
    @IMAN7THRYLOS 3 місяці тому +1498

    If I understand correctly, a Patriot system locked on them, fired three missiles and they managed to evade them.
    I guess this means the Su-34 is a stellar plane and these pilots are TopGun material.

    • @RyeOnHam
      @RyeOnHam 3 місяці тому +60

      Hmmm, given that between 25 and 35 SU-34's have been shot down during the conflict, I'd say your guess is a little off the mark.

    • @technoartfest8708
      @technoartfest8708 3 місяці тому +140

      The way i understand is the Su-34 job was to drop the glide bomb and follow instructions how to evade the patriots missile , with real time location of the missile flight path. The SU-35 job was to defend their wing bomber by takinge down 2 of 3 patriots missiles.
      A drone operator missing in the chat likely warned Central command of Rus airforce of a missile launch of Patriots. Because there are videos of this when it happens , of a patriot battery firing 2 missiles. So it was a team work.. not just the work of Su-34

    • @nomad7734
      @nomad7734 3 місяці тому +319

      @@RyeOnHamLol… propaganda nonsense 😂

    • @gilianrampart8514
      @gilianrampart8514 3 місяці тому +11

      EXACTLY!!!!!

    • @gilianrampart8514
      @gilianrampart8514 3 місяці тому

      ​@nomad7734
      Russia will smoke the USA,watch!

  • @greybuckleton
    @greybuckleton 3 місяці тому +616

    I felt the weapons officer was pretty good here. Only spoke a few times, mostly let his pilot work. Gave him a few useful bits of info at the right time. The controllers showing the most stress ironically enough.

    • @arthurmoore9488
      @arthurmoore9488 3 місяці тому +53

      Plus, talking is difficult when you're pulling Gs like that. You can really hear it in the coms.

    • @robrob9050
      @robrob9050 3 місяці тому +30

      @@greybuckleton He was cold AF much more pro than A-50 dude, who got quite emotional.

    • @tropickman
      @tropickman 2 місяці тому +26

      The navigator speaks so softly to the pilot: "Go right Andruha"

    • @Deno2100
      @Deno2100 2 місяці тому +55

      well the guy on the ground is going to blame himself if the pilot gets hit, sometimes or for some people it's more scary to be responsible for someone else then for yourself

    • @Todd_357
      @Todd_357 2 місяці тому +9

      @@Deno2100 100% true

  • @thorstenkurafeiski1845
    @thorstenkurafeiski1845 3 місяці тому +1156

    Calling metric units "communist" is the most "tell me you're american without telling me you're american" I ever heard.

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  3 місяці тому +116

      Hell yeah. 🤘🏼🇺🇸

    • @zippyfinleyadventures
      @zippyfinleyadventures 3 місяці тому +44

      ​@@CWLemoineEven if metric is french it will never not be funny 🤣🤘

    • @crevis12
      @crevis12 3 місяці тому

      Metric has nothing to do with commies.. the rest of the world is Metric.. you will be to one day 💙🇨🇦

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  3 місяці тому +12

      Not likely.

    • @zippyfinleyadventures
      @zippyfinleyadventures 3 місяці тому +9

      @@CWLemoine thanks for doing what you do from a small country, trying to recall what my Southern Buddy said was a good greeting - Raise hell praise Dale !

  • @aligatork
    @aligatork 3 місяці тому +1358

    what I found very impressive, is the fact that the SU-34 which is really a heavy jet and more a kind of bomber manage to survive.. I mean in a fast and maneuverable jet like SU-35 or F-18 the chances of escaping might be bigger, but if you realize how heavy SU-34 is, you realize the smart design of Flanker in therm of maneuverability.. and it shows that even in age of electronic warfare and other high-tech anti-missile system the maneuverability of a jet and the skills of the pilot is still damn important

    • @charlie15627
      @charlie15627 3 місяці тому +346

      The 34 is still designed to fly fast and pull Gees, even though it is a large aircraft.
      They hit the deck (less than 1000 ft), at max thrust and started pulling the missile left and right. They forced that missile to burn itself out pushing through dense air while pulling 180s.
      I thought they did a great job 10/10👍

    • @DrakenDXD
      @DrakenDXD 3 місяці тому +26

      @@charlie15627 hell yea

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 3 місяці тому +139

      Su34 is a badass big boi

    • @darugdawg2453
      @darugdawg2453 3 місяці тому +24

      Su34 is bad ass? So tf is happening to ukraine this past yr

    • @3dmax911
      @3dmax911 3 місяці тому +6

      true 100%

  • @panpanplusplus
    @panpanplusplus 2 місяці тому +1128

    But hey. At least patriot can hit an F16

    • @Neyreyan
      @Neyreyan 2 місяці тому +87

      brutal:)

    • @hksp
      @hksp 2 місяці тому +73

      su57 hit it from 200km+++ away

    • @LabiaLicker
      @LabiaLicker 2 місяці тому +3

      hahahahahha

    • @Giganibba511
      @Giganibba511 2 місяці тому +7

      @@hksp what?

    • @mrobocop1666
      @mrobocop1666 2 місяці тому +12

      ​@@hksp only if it's R-37M missile

  • @Scohill
    @Scohill 3 місяці тому +278

    Everyone talking about GCI here, but GCI literally saved the pilotes life, I am not a pilot but I understand enough to know that the stress of having 3 patriot missiles hunting you and pulling G's for 4 minutes straight is not exactly gonna give you the clearest head to make the most optimal decisions, especially if you don't see the missiles.

    • @gilianrampart8514
      @gilianrampart8514 3 місяці тому +3

      THANK YOU!😅

    • @shisui3436
      @shisui3436 2 місяці тому +29

      It were actually 5 missiles. 3 launched at the beginning and two added when a Su-35 was detected but chased also the Su-34 since they were in a tandem flight.

    • @mariano7699
      @mariano7699 2 місяці тому +4

      Plausible 👍 😊

    • @toriyshaov2245
      @toriyshaov2245 23 дні тому

      @@shisui3436 Call sign for Su-35 was 813. They managed to kill the Patriots radar with X-31 or something like it that flight as I heard.

    • @BurntPlaydoh
      @BurntPlaydoh 13 днів тому

      Nobody says that, but it's better to not be shot at - let alone detected - in the first place. Evasion is for when you're already a few layers into the survivability onion.

  • @vaclovasverikaitis4172
    @vaclovasverikaitis4172 3 місяці тому +431

    You may hate Russians, but credit where credit is due. You're a pilot, man. He escaped a Patriot missile battery. Russian jets are pretty good. BTW the controller with the radar was likely an A50 AWACS.

    • @ymroo8299
      @ymroo8299 3 місяці тому +23

      obviously he didnt care, he is on the otherside so he wouldnt be rooting for the enemy to be as skilled when time comes.

    • @Кънязь
      @Кънязь 3 місяці тому

      Who gives a fuck? He is enemy from the enemy terrorist state

    • @izajahmed8863
      @izajahmed8863 2 місяці тому +104

      ​​@@ymroo8299It's always obvious and typical of an American to show this gesture towards Russians both in Hollywood and real life... Dude should have done something like that and talk... Till then he needs to be quiet 🤫

    • @JPragma4657
      @JPragma4657 2 місяці тому +9

      Pilots are that percentage of machiavellian narcissists who just happen to be adored for their ability to operate machinery under stress.🤡

    • @eminence_
      @eminence_ 2 місяці тому +6

      0 credit to these orcs

  • @Stinger522
    @Stinger522 3 місяці тому +941

    Politics aside. Pilot skill is pilot skill. Anyone who can pull that off in a heavy ass plane...
    Respect.

    • @soccerguy2433
      @soccerguy2433 3 місяці тому +27

      respect to the RU? no way.

    • @beatmaker50
      @beatmaker50 3 місяці тому +144

      Came here to say the same thing. It really humanizes the struggle when you hear the audio like this.

    • @Stubbies2003
      @Stubbies2003 3 місяці тому +8

      The only reason this was "pulled off" is due to early warning from the ground controller. If it hadn't been for that no amount of pilot skill would have saved that aircraft.

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 3 місяці тому +141

      @@Stubbies2003 so.. he did his job? What a suprise

    • @xaber_
      @xaber_ 3 місяці тому +203

      @@soccerguy2433 just because you 'stand with Ukraine' doesn't change it. End of the day it's soldiers doing their job for their country.

  • @rodman7224
    @rodman7224 2 місяці тому +257

    The SU34 is a bad ass bird great design

    • @BoringBrandi
      @BoringBrandi 2 місяці тому +19

      Definitely a pretty plane

    • @Ariana321
      @Ariana321 9 днів тому +3

      @@BoringBrandi The whole Flanker line is absolutely beautiful. Yeah, you can say what you want about the performance figures, but aesthetically it's just a work of art.

  • @DarkTranqz
    @DarkTranqz 3 місяці тому +142

    They dragged that missile down into dense air by staying low and made it burn most of it's energy in said dense air with all of the maneuvering left and right.

    • @Frugivorix34
      @Frugivorix34 2 місяці тому +2

      Yes it's either this or trying a notch but the last one is not safe and for last resort.

    • @antonywooster6783
      @antonywooster6783 2 місяці тому

      Thanks for that explanation.

    • @АнтоДив
      @АнтоДив 2 місяці тому +6

      Первое разумное объяснение.

    • @shawntandy4326
      @shawntandy4326 2 місяці тому

      make sense brother!

    • @loicalex
      @loicalex 2 місяці тому +8

      @@Frugivorix34 we can hear the constant G pulls breathing from the pilot, that's high speed G's maneuvering in dense air IMO. That aircraft was good for some heavy maintenance tho lol

  • @ANTONMOKOS
    @ANTONMOKOS 3 місяці тому +184

    Maverick is now quietly envious.

  • @sovietbanana4589
    @sovietbanana4589 3 місяці тому +218

    Hey so the directing voice is either AWACS or ground controller connected via datalink to a AWACS. Because of datalink the patriots can’t be detected on rwr until the missiles go pitbull relatively close. However due to the power and range of a AWACS radar it can detect them on launch. This evasion shows a successful information chain and proper training from all involved parties.

    • @bruce271085
      @bruce271085 3 місяці тому +31

      Yes. Mover showed some arrogance when he rubbished the VVS and stated the awacs have all been shot down.

    • @sovietbanana4589
      @sovietbanana4589 3 місяці тому +42

      @@bruce271085 it’s a weird claim too, Russia operates about 40 a-50 awacs and have only lost 2 of them during the war.
      Edit: my dumbass took original production numbers while not considering those lost in dissolution. Although the general point still stands that Russia is far from being out of AWACS aircraft.

    • @_b_x_b_1063
      @_b_x_b_1063 3 місяці тому

      ​@@sovietbanana458912

    • @tawahachee8914
      @tawahachee8914 3 місяці тому +9

      ​@@sovietbanana458940? There was info that they only had like 8 total, and now it's 6

    • @sovietbanana4589
      @sovietbanana4589 3 місяці тому +9

      @@tawahachee8914 going off official production run, probably lost a few as the years went on. We don’t know ow to official numbers because that shit is classified af

  • @zemm9003
    @zemm9003 2 місяці тому +82

    The "maneuverability is not important" nonsense started with the F-35. Lockheed Martin were supposed to make a better plane but they couldn't. Pilots starting complaining the plane is a brick. The company replied "all that matters is the electronics". The DOD that is corrupt as hell, instead of demanding an improved plane just bought into the excuse and still moved ahead with the orders, now real combat in a real war has demonstrated that maneuverability is still very important to preserve the lives of the pilots and the aircraft itself.

  • @Minato_Tendo
    @Minato_Tendo 2 місяці тому +50

    ​@CWLemoine why the downtalk? Are you even evade strikes like that against modern air defence system? And SU-34 is a masterpiece, multipurpose fighter bomber and prove that one more time by evade not 1 but 3 Patriot missiles, how many american jets can do that? Any bomber? Your totally downtalk about achievement that only a few pilots and planes can do.
    Never gonna understand why americans hate russians so much, because russians people don't hate americans and anybody can see that if travel there. Decades of hollywood propaganda make a good job it seems...

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  2 місяці тому +1

      What down talk?

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  23 дні тому

      @ where did you fly?

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  21 день тому

      @@birchwot6979 so you didn’t fly. STFU.

    • @karlson8524
      @karlson8524 50 хвилин тому

      U absolutely right, dude

  • @Carl-o5d
    @Carl-o5d 2 місяці тому +101

    As a pilot I have a lot respect for the Russian Pilot, I was not cheering to hear him die. Great maneuvering and skill, not to many fighter pilots can pull that out against patriot.

  • @ArtemKatranzhi
    @ArtemKatranzhi 3 місяці тому +760

    Your guess is right - there are 4 persons in conversations, one was missed during translation.
    754 - Su-34 with "JDAMS"
    813 - Su-35 with Kh-31P working as a cover for 754. His voice calls "Patriot i illuminating, egress"
    And the ground officer, who tells headings, speed, altitudes, etc.
    Brief description of circumstances.
    Night strike mission for Su-34 and Su-35 as a anti-SAM. Seconds before bomb drops radar of Patriot start to engage a Su-34.
    Ground officer order to abort the mission, but the crew wait and drop the bombs to the target(s)
    813 wich is also saw the Patriot's radar work shoot the Kh-31P to the source of radiation.
    UPDATE
    FAQ answers:
    1. The source of this record - russian telegram channel, and the UA-cam channel of the same author. Record was published at the beginning of July.
    2. These details which i stated here were in description and comments of original posts in telegram and UA-cam in russian.

    • @starkov7284
      @starkov7284 3 місяці тому +14

      Hi, interesting addon to the story, could you share you sources?

    • @killman369547
      @killman369547 3 місяці тому +29

      Hmm i wonder what happened to the Patriot battery then if any of those weapons found their mark.

    • @Igor-ug1uo
      @Igor-ug1uo 3 місяці тому +3

      How do you know this? Also, why is your profile impossible to access and find in search?

    • @ArtemKatranzhi
      @ArtemKatranzhi 3 місяці тому +14

      @@mikes989 fifth if we count RITA

    • @AMOUREDD
      @AMOUREDD 3 місяці тому +17

      Awacs not ground control

  • @AlexanderSeven
    @AlexanderSeven 3 місяці тому +155

    The pilot cannot decide which direction he chooses as he cannot see missile behind him at distance, it's speed, movement direction etc, ground operator has all information and gives pilots best directions to evade attack, they don't have to follow it, it's just best thing they can do in this situation.

  • @stevidente
    @stevidente 3 місяці тому +200

    Came for the “Blyats”, stayed for the skill.

    • @aatifrehman4150
      @aatifrehman4150 2 місяці тому +4

      Suprise stereotypes who would have thought of it

    • @ZhivkoIvanov-pq9eb
      @ZhivkoIvanov-pq9eb 2 місяці тому +6

      Normally, the “Blyats” are not coming from the direct counterparts in such an engagement. You can see in other pilot videos- the guys are unnormal cool.

  • @ionutvrabie5730
    @ionutvrabie5730 3 місяці тому +58

    He is not only alive, he is a f.... legend now....Brilliant!!!

  • @kittyhawk9707
    @kittyhawk9707 3 місяці тому +480

    I don't give a damn about petty politics .. no matter what the nationality .. I don't want to hear somebody die on air thank you very much .. Total respect to that Pilot .. he flew for his life ..and won

    • @TMAN-iq2kz
      @TMAN-iq2kz 2 місяці тому +34

      You have to give credit where it’s Due…..

    • @thelongvirtuesignal8551
      @thelongvirtuesignal8551 2 місяці тому +15

      Amen.

    • @vmasing1965
      @vmasing1965 2 місяці тому +14

      This is war, not some schoolbus carrying kids to school. The Russian bomber was busy killing people when it was targeted and managed to get away with it scot-free. If you're happy about it you have never thought it through what are you actually supporting. Like with a career criminal, by saving him today you will only condemn all his future victims to their deaths.
      Unfortunately you're noty alone in this, there's lots of people in this world who can't understand this, as we can see playing out every day in NY, Los Angeles and Chicago...

    • @tonyv5202
      @tonyv5202 2 місяці тому +61

      ​@@vmasing1965Russian pilot was flying a mission. He wasn't a mad criminal bomber blowing up busses full of children.

    • @vmasing1965
      @vmasing1965 2 місяці тому +11

      @@tonyv5202 Neither were Nazi pilots. Congratulations, those are your new heroes. You should stop and think about that for a second...

  • @joshuarooney8614
    @joshuarooney8614 2 місяці тому +100

    Has anyone ever evaded a patriot missile ? Apart from these ballsy pilots

    • @samuelhufschmid70882
      @samuelhufschmid70882 2 місяці тому +23

      Bonne question. C'est la première fois à ma connaissance qu'on a un retour d'informations après une attaque de 3 missiles Patriot.

    • @El_Presidente_YT
      @El_Presidente_YT 2 місяці тому +43

      Russian pilots say that they have to do this on a regular basis every day and every night.

    • @joshuarooney8614
      @joshuarooney8614 2 місяці тому +15

      @@El_Presidente_YT that means they are getting more experience daily

    • @killman369547
      @killman369547 2 місяці тому +15

      @@El_Presidente_YT Then they must be getting pretty f**king good at it by now.

    • @robrob9050
      @robrob9050 2 місяці тому

      ​@@samuelhufschmid70882SPEAK ENGLISH

  • @torquebiker9959
    @torquebiker9959 2 місяці тому +78

    how about Patriot vs F16 🤣🤣🤣

    • @CHRISKASSMUKEN
      @CHRISKASSMUKEN 2 місяці тому +14

      The patriot shot down it own F-16 jet 😂😂

  • @dewboy910
    @dewboy910 2 місяці тому +22

    American here and I was pulling for the Russian. Absolutely!

  • @charlie15627
    @charlie15627 3 місяці тому +205

    They were at less than 1000 ft pulling hard Gs at max thrust.
    You heard them pulling left and then switching back to pull right, making the Patriot, which has to pull lead on them, have to make a 180° turn to pull lead on them again. This is long after the Patriot expended all its fuel and no longer has thrust. Its pretty hard to pull a 180° and keep flying when you no longer have thrust. Sure, you can manage it with long slow turns but that's not an option for a SAM.
    I thought they did a great job.👍

    • @barbdwyer22
      @barbdwyer22 3 місяці тому +5

      One patriot still hit in proximity. They got lucky more than anything.
      The missile damaged comms and supposedly the pilot was hit in the arm.

    • @wubuck79
      @wubuck79 3 місяці тому +56

      @@barbdwyer22oh yeah, pure luck. No skill, no purposeful maneuvering. Just luck. 🙄

    • @Stubbies2003
      @Stubbies2003 3 місяці тому +3

      Yeah you might want to work on your math degrees skills. If anything turns 180 degrees it is completely reversing direction. That is NOT happening here. Yes the missile has to adjust course but it is no where even REMOTELY close to 180 degrees. The only time it is going to even be a big change is if the pilot keeps flying off angle in one direction. If he is just turning left and right over and over the degree change at range is small. Enough to cause extra drag on the missile though.

    • @joelau2383
      @joelau2383 3 місяці тому +5

      ​@@barbdwyer22It looks more like the long high G maneuver loosening something in the com system. If the missile fragments really hit the aircraft, the aircraft would suffer significant aerodynamic vibration and instability even it only makes a few holes on the aircraft.

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 3 місяці тому

      @@joelau2383 it is a 45 ton machine after all, maybe surviving a hit sounds plausible

  • @nevbones4599
    @nevbones4599 2 місяці тому +27

    The Russian pilot just wasted 12 Million dollars of our Tax dollars.

  • @to1tu_sr7_34b
    @to1tu_sr7_34b 2 місяці тому +59

    Petriot missiles exploded from behind the plane. That's what the pilot says. After the explosion, the pilot lost communication with the right side of his helmet. And injured his arm. The planes were leaving at top speed and the safety system warned of overload. The events are taking place in the Donetsk region under the control of the Russian Federation near the city of Mariupol.

    • @hotcakesism
      @hotcakesism 2 місяці тому +37

      Glad they made it, salute to the Russian fighters!

    • @ahatrunglun4801
      @ahatrunglun4801 2 місяці тому

      @@to1tu_sr7_34byeah yeah yeah time for your meds

    • @nukleincheg
      @nukleincheg 2 місяці тому +12

      His right had was injured by G-forces. Russian fighters has a controle joystik between pilots' legs. It's difficult to controle your hand on it when 7-8 G-force push you.

    • @Escapist_on_the_Moon
      @Escapist_on_the_Moon 2 місяці тому

      ​@@to1tu_sr7_34byour dream, no more

  • @louielouie7806
    @louielouie7806 2 місяці тому +46

    "Most of their AWACS have been shot down?" According to who, Ukraine, lol?
    The same Ukraine who refuses to admit it was a SU 57 that shot down the "game changing" F16 and cope so hard theyd rather advance an incident of blue on blue than giving Russia the credit.

  • @abissuminvocat
    @abissuminvocat 3 місяці тому +75

    The two-seater cabin of the Su-34 is surrounded by a shell of titanium armor 17 mm thick, the mass of armor protection is almost one and a half tons. It is a distant descendant of the Il-2.

    • @exploringtheplanetsn
      @exploringtheplanetsn 2 місяці тому +7

      The two aircraft have literally nothing in common. It’s like saying the Abrams is the descendant of the Sherman tank because of armor.

    • @milangacik994
      @milangacik994 2 місяці тому +11

      Not many knows that SU 34 is equipped with chemical WC and small kichenette... I guess next development will be sauna.

    • @milangacik994
      @milangacik994 2 місяці тому +1

      Same armor has Su 25 and MiG 23.

    • @tonyk3912
      @tonyk3912 Місяць тому +1

      Russia has more titanium than any other country

    • @lil__boi3027
      @lil__boi3027 28 днів тому

      Yo wait a min mig-23 has titanium armor? Any source?​@@milangacik994

  • @user-di5rm9ee1p
    @user-di5rm9ee1p 3 місяці тому +495

    For decades western "experts" speak how maneuverability is not important but here we see heavy bomber avoiding 3 AA missiles. Those russian shovels...

    • @arseniy_viktorovich
      @arseniy_viktorovich 3 місяці тому +27

      Yep, they always say that you need it only for the merge, but I've always wondered why these guys neglect THIS kind of situation.

    • @mikeck4609
      @mikeck4609 3 місяці тому +33

      They don’t say maneuverability isn’t important….they say it isn’t as important as stealth, SA and BVR capabilities. In other words, the F-35 isn’t an inferior fighter to the SU-27 just because the latter is more “maneuverable”. The abilities above are more relevant… that doesn’t mean everything else is irrelevant

    • @user-di5rm9ee1p
      @user-di5rm9ee1p 3 місяці тому +37

      @@mikeck4609 You just proved my point. As they, you are first thinking about dogfight. For Russians, maneuverability of the plane has little to do with air to air combat.

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 3 місяці тому +97

      @@user-di5rm9ee1p americans usually don’t like to see feats unless it’s their own

    • @Agnemons
      @Agnemons 3 місяці тому +12

      Like anything, it's not important until you need it. At that point, if you don't have it, it's usually critical or termianl.

  • @alexgoler7617
    @alexgoler7617 2 місяці тому +54

    Slipping 3 in a bomber is nuts.

    • @ESB-f3z
      @ESB-f3z 2 місяці тому

      It's fake news. Stop watching this crap. We have more reliable sources like CNN

    • @Sedona-cl6eg
      @Sedona-cl6eg 2 місяці тому

      They were caught with their pants down and lived to tell about it. Should of had more mutual support.

    • @theorncampbell4432
      @theorncampbell4432 2 місяці тому +10

      5 missiles were fired.

  • @batkex3002
    @batkex3002 3 місяці тому +122

    one thing should be kept in mind when comparing NATO with Russian pilots, NATO pilots have never been in combat where technically advanced anti-aircraft systems are used.
    most of what was taken down during the Yu Wars in the 90's was hit with a portable(shoulder) launcher systems.

    • @flamezealous
      @flamezealous 2 місяці тому +4

      You misfired yourself; an F-16 is famous for dodging 6 SAMS in Iraq, and NATO jets too did around Yugoslavian SAMs!!

    • @MM-tw7pu
      @MM-tw7pu 2 місяці тому +24

      NATO pilots don’t even have 1/100th the experience the Russians gained from Ukraine war against NATO equipment

    • @SuperDjavol
      @SuperDjavol 2 місяці тому +20

      usa and nato atack only countries without or low level air defence!

    • @SuperDjavol
      @SuperDjavol 2 місяці тому +15

      @@flamezealous thats all air defence from 1960

    • @batkex3002
      @batkex3002 2 місяці тому +11

      @@flamezealous which part of "technically advanced" you don’t understand? The army of Yugoslavia used the Neva and Kub systems. Both are equipped with technology from the 60's and 70's. It is true that the F117 was taken down with NEVA, but anyone who understands this topic will say that pilot error is the 100%cause of this.
      In both cases, Iraq and Serbia, before the attack by planes the stationary radar systems were totally destroyed with tomahawks.

  • @fairwarning007
    @fairwarning007 3 місяці тому +410

    I recently saw someone refer to the Su-34 as a “flying platypus” and now I can’t unsee it.

    • @SoloRenegade
      @SoloRenegade 3 місяці тому +27

      many of us have called it that for years 😃

    • @kdavidsmith1
      @kdavidsmith1 3 місяці тому +53

      An Su-34?
      PERRY the Su-34!?!
      -Dr. Doofenshmirtz, probably

    • @aarontheaviationaddict3643
      @aarontheaviationaddict3643 3 місяці тому +18

      @@kdavidsmith1
      Agent SU

    • @Mobius118
      @Mobius118 3 місяці тому +1

      @@kdavidsmith1 You win comment of the week

    • @greybuckleton
      @greybuckleton 3 місяці тому +4

      Duckbill

  • @BrianM78
    @BrianM78 3 місяці тому +141

    The mighty Hell Duck

    • @StefanBlagojevic
      @StefanBlagojevic 2 місяці тому +1

      @BrianM78 Back in early 2000's we used to call it after the Aussie "Platypus". The Hell Duck in news to me...

  • @sharjinalaviantik9688
    @sharjinalaviantik9688 2 місяці тому +82

    patriots against advanced f16: 💀
    patriots against a bomber fighter: 🤡

    • @NikolaTesla-nb5nm
      @NikolaTesla-nb5nm 2 місяці тому +6

      LMAO

    • @StefanBlagojevic
      @StefanBlagojevic 2 місяці тому +3

      @sharjinalaviantik9688 Extra points for originality! 👍👍👍👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣

  • @tonymontana-zg5tt
    @tonymontana-zg5tt 2 місяці тому +43

    The SU 34 bomber is a masterpiece of aviation technology! The pilot got maximum power from his jet and was able to survive.💪

  • @2000toinfinity
    @2000toinfinity 2 місяці тому +299

    Yet they want you to believe Patriot downs Khinzals🤣

    • @techzolute
      @techzolute 2 місяці тому +40

      It was all propaganda.😂😂😂😂

    • @jbeverley67
      @jbeverley67 2 місяці тому +13

      They do. I remember when a certain country said the s400 was the best sam ever yet yall lost entire batteries to atacms.

    • @2000toinfinity
      @2000toinfinity 2 місяці тому

      @@jbeverley67 there is no evidence of this. Kiev Post doesn't count as evidence, neither do CIA bots or NAFO turds.

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER 2 місяці тому +23

      ​@@jbeverley67entire 😂 they have 13 launcher destroyed and all with saturated with atamcs 12 missile vs 1 s-400 battery also only those laucher taken out where pantsir TOR BUK are not placed and us awacs and ecm jet given their postion to atamcs operator otherwise russian will bring down all us air asset 1st then you see atamcs become ineffective

    • @kirtigkg
      @kirtigkg 2 місяці тому +1

      😂

  • @АркадийНевыдуманный
    @АркадийНевыдуманный 3 місяці тому +241

    Btw: controller was not in the ground, but in A-50 AWACS plane.

    • @RasyidNazar
      @RasyidNazar 3 місяці тому +6

      So it would be the destroyed a50 by patriot around sea of azov then , they are referring to mariupol and coastline,probably right .

    • @Anonymous-tj8xm
      @Anonymous-tj8xm 3 місяці тому +96

      @@RasyidNazarthere isn’t just the one a50, there are several of them

    • @Krishna0666
      @Krishna0666 3 місяці тому +84

      @@RasyidNazar A50 working range is much bigger, than Patriot's. When Ukrainians managed to hit A50 down it was an "ambush", when they delievered Patriot battery close to frontline and made an attack from there. But nowdays they don't do it, because Russian military improved airdrone intellegence a lot

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Krishna0666 It wasn't a Patriot, but a S-200.

    • @Krishna0666
      @Krishna0666 3 місяці тому +41

      @@JAnx01 That was a disinformation. S200 was not capable of that shot.

  • @ismaelkone7365
    @ismaelkone7365 3 місяці тому +282

    Haters will always be haters can’t admit that Russians fighter are as good as western fighters😂😂😂

    • @divinehenry
      @divinehenry 2 місяці тому +51

      Far better than western fighters

    • @EstraNiato
      @EstraNiato 2 місяці тому +30

      Imagine "rooting" for a missile vs for a crew trying to survive. The comparison with stroke 3 is completely ridiculous those were defending against SA-2 :)

    • @techzolute
      @techzolute 2 місяці тому +13

      And better. Really.

    • @Frugivorix34
      @Frugivorix34 2 місяці тому +33

      Maybe more, I saw a french documentary where french pilots said they welcomed a russian pilot on their base, briefed him a few hours on the Mirage 2000 and got in the air for simulated dogfights... They said he took all of them one by one !

    • @silentone11111111
      @silentone11111111 2 місяці тому +11

      Glad they won. Revelling in death isn’t very cool

  • @mussydesign7933
    @mussydesign7933 2 місяці тому +22

    looks like the patriot is as useful now as it was in the 1990s, for those of you too young to remember it took more than 20 missiles to take out a single SCUD

    • @tonyk3912
      @tonyk3912 Місяць тому

      According to Prof Postol an MIT rocket scientist it never got any scuds. See Daniel Davis Deep Dive recently

  • @DXD2004-
    @DXD2004- 3 місяці тому +93

    Lets wait for round #2: S400 vs F16!

    • @andreasfjellborg1810
      @andreasfjellborg1810 3 місяці тому +17

      Going to be R-37M vs F16.

    • @tumelochana345
      @tumelochana345 3 місяці тому +18

      Mig31 will pick those F-16s like birds using R37M.

    • @f4ucorsair153
      @f4ucorsair153 3 місяці тому +4

      Time will tell. Both sides are conservative with their aircraft use due to heavy SAM presence.

    • @divinehenry
      @divinehenry 2 місяці тому

      😅😊😅😊 you are mad man, that is funny

    • @firefly2900
      @firefly2900 2 місяці тому +18

      So far f16 vs Patriot has happened

  • @alexandervolte8240
    @alexandervolte8240 2 місяці тому +19

    theres a good video here on youtube ( interview of a german jet pilot of the western german army who got his hands for the first time on a MIG29 in 1990s when the eastern german army got included into the western german army) he said the Mig29 ( ofc its not a heavy bomber like the Su34) but he said the MIG29 is like driving a formula 1 car compared to the NATO stuff he flew before ) only complainment was the Mig29 has low range

  • @claytonskinner568
    @claytonskinner568 3 місяці тому +187

    That was probably so physically taxing. Holy crap, bet he was tense for days after that at the very least

    • @greybuckleton
      @greybuckleton 3 місяці тому +28

      No, the Vodka kicked in only 30 mins after landing.

    • @quazars236
      @quazars236 3 місяці тому +8

      @@greybuckleton actually just half of a cigarette.

    • @greybuckleton
      @greybuckleton 3 місяці тому +10

      @@quazars236 Ohh I dunno man, that was a lot of missles he just dodged and one of them blew up close enough that he thought Viktor was hit! Thats at least 1/4 of a a bottle of stress there.

    • @PaulusN-p3m
      @PaulusN-p3m 3 місяці тому

      In these days he couldn't murder Ukrainians

    • @СемёнСемёнов-д3э
      @СемёнСемёнов-д3э 9 днів тому

      на самом деле потребовалась только половина ложки стирального порошка для внутренней поверхности костюма от перегрузок) а сам пилот уже после магического русского заклинания "bl.ad'" был в порядке

  • @jorgerosado6674
    @jorgerosado6674 2 місяці тому +41

    Patriots system isnt that of a wonder weapon as you lead us to believe and then again you just down played the work of the Russian pilots and shows your biased but good tho you managed to explain some of it...😊

    • @pointerish
      @pointerish 2 місяці тому +5

      He's from the US and used (?) to be a pilot for the US military. Of course he's biased and that's normal. I would never believe him if he said otherwise.

    • @thestruggler3338
      @thestruggler3338 2 місяці тому

      patriot is wonder waffle

    • @zartic4life
      @zartic4life 2 місяці тому +4

      Bro he's American probably watches Fox News take it easy seems like a good guy like most average Americans.

    • @Sedona-cl6eg
      @Sedona-cl6eg 2 місяці тому

      He was brainwashed long ago into believing the US was not run by political criminals.

  • @Heegooat
    @Heegooat 3 місяці тому +16

    You just know that there is something special about the fullback....it just looks legendary...and it is

  • @Stockfish1511
    @Stockfish1511 2 місяці тому +84

    What do they say? Bad planes and bad pilots? yeah sure lets say US aces pull shit like this. Oh wait they only fight arabs in sandals ofc.

    • @OverG88
      @OverG88 Місяць тому +4

      Well, I wouldn't underestimate US pilots at all. However, until this war, we had never seen an engagement by a SAM at a distance of over 30 km. What was the most dangerous thing that the US Army faced? Like Kub SA-6? Just this engagement was made at a distance of approx. 90 km! To make things even more challenging, thanks to AESAs and active radar homing, you don't even know if a missile was fired at you unless your radar, GCI or A50 doesn't detect it. Mocking both Russian and Ukrainian losses is nonsense, considering the sheer power of nowadays SAM's.

    • @Stockfish1511
      @Stockfish1511 Місяць тому +11

      @@OverG88 it easy to say russian pilots are bad. Harder to fight against one of the most layeres airdefences in the world in Ukraine and russian pilots are flying lets say alot. Ive seen pilot interview were he said they do sometimes 3-4 flights surviving on red bulls. Su34 alone does on average 40-50 flight missions a day. Imagine doung all that with so many air defences against you. Well ukrainian pilots barely manage to do anything because russian air defences at the borders are extremely powerful and they have always mig31s and su35s lurking in the air. I dont think US pilots are bad,but compared to what russians and ukrainians are dealing with past 3 years they are rookies. They would need alot of experience and training to match them. There is nothing more teaching than real combat and risky one ag that. No matter how many simulators you do real combat is different

  • @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я
    @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я 3 місяці тому +53

    I read about this case today. As I understand it, the Su-35 covered the Su-34 and provided information about the missile. A missile was also fired at the Patriot launcher in response. As I understand it, one Patriot missile was shot down. A Russian pilot in his blog says that Patriot and Nasams/IRIS systems are constantly used against Russian aircraft.

    • @ajstyles5704
      @ajstyles5704 2 місяці тому

      Did they hit the Patriot? 3 missiles, all missed against SU34, could a full squadron be able to hit their original target and take out the patriot as well?

    • @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я
      @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я 2 місяці тому +8

      @@ajstyles5704 1 missile was shot down, but I'm not sure about that. As I understand it, it was like this. Su-35 attacked Patriot in response with Kh-31 (AS-17 Krypton) missile

    • @deadvatniks
      @deadvatniks 2 місяці тому +2

      ​This missile would take hours to reach the Patriot launch side, sounds like russian propaganda

    • @ajstyles5704
      @ajstyles5704 2 місяці тому +5

      @@deadvatniks you actually expect Patriots to shoot the moment it entered within a patriot top range, that's insane, this aint a game.

    • @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я
      @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я 2 місяці тому

      @@deadvatniks you didn't study physics well at school, cope

  • @olanrewajuin2008
    @olanrewajuin2008 2 місяці тому +11

    This is why the building of fighter bombers that Russia usually does and carried over from the soviet doctrine makes sense. You build a heavy plane that can cary large layloads, and very manouverable even when fully loaded.

  • @arvinthkumar841
    @arvinthkumar841 3 місяці тому +83

    I read somewhere that a SU-35 was escorting them

    • @lukewhitehouse4103
      @lukewhitehouse4103 3 місяці тому +34

      Usually the case a Su-35 will carry the R-37M and a Anti radiation missile.

    • @kermittoad
      @kermittoad 3 місяці тому +31

      ​@@lukewhitehouse4103Always with 2x37M, 2x77-1, 1xKH-31, 2xR-73

    • @Errorcutive
      @Errorcutive 3 місяці тому

      ​@@kermittoad source ?

    • @Slavic_Goblin
      @Slavic_Goblin 3 місяці тому +2

      @@lukewhitehouse4103
      If true, that makes a dead radar, presumably.
      But I doubt Ukrainians would be so merrily painting the Su 34 with radar if such escorts were the norm.

    • @kermittoad
      @kermittoad 3 місяці тому +9

      @@Slavic_Goblin not how that works, ARMs(AGM-88C, KH31PD/AD) are not very hard to shoot down, even the early S300PT ukraine have will be able to shoot down a KH-31, not considering other measures to defeat ARMs.

  • @N.California
    @N.California 2 місяці тому +11

    Honestly, I'm just glad he made it home to see his family.

  • @NickyDekker89
    @NickyDekker89 3 місяці тому +136

    Mover talking about commie units when the USA is more communist than Russia at the moment 😂

    • @petartrajkovski465
      @petartrajkovski465 3 місяці тому +8

      👏👏👍👍👍👍❤❤

    • @chilbiyito
      @chilbiyito 3 місяці тому +3

      How exactly?

    • @glennvanhoecke7798
      @glennvanhoecke7798 3 місяці тому

      @@chilbiyito You must remain stupid, it makes you smart 😂🤣

    • @ZeuRus09
      @ZeuRus09 3 місяці тому +9

      In the US they use imperial units. And what's so bad about communism? I hope to get an answer from a man from the US who thinks he's a woman )

    • @NickyDekker89
      @NickyDekker89 3 місяці тому +3

      @@ZeuRus09 Maybe you should read a book more often.

  • @Koozomec
    @Koozomec 3 місяці тому +600

    US control : I am your eyes.
    Russ control : You are my body.

    • @joelau2383
      @joelau2383 3 місяці тому +39

      @@Koozomec US control provide info for pilot. US pilot need experience and brain power to make decisions. Russia control provide info and decision for pilot. Russia newbie pilot can simply focus on flying according to orders. Russia control concept is kind of sci-fi if it has cutting edge technologies.

    • @mrbigberd
      @mrbigberd 3 місяці тому +138

      When you're pulling max Gs, your vision is tunneled, your thought process is impaired, and you may not have loads of flight hours, simply obeying the clear-headed guy with much better awareness of the situation doesn't seem like such a bad idea.

    • @z1maass727
      @z1maass727 3 місяці тому

      @@joelau2383 There's a reason that soviet fighter pilots are known to have very poor dog fighting skill ( WVR combat) even compare to the countries they are selling warplanes to. Vietnamese and even Egyptian pilots, from their experience fighting against US and Israeli pilots, are far more skillful in air to air combat than soviets who has never seen an actual fight. Search for "Operation Rimon 20" and you'll find more interesting stuff.
      During the later years of cold wars the soviets are also trying to build they own "TOPGUN" school in middle asia, specifically training MiG-23 pilots for dog fighting without ground control

    • @3.9L_V8
      @3.9L_V8 3 місяці тому +23

      This is a good way to put it. In Russian aviation, the GCI is the shaft of the spear, the fighter itself is the tip. The tip is useless on its own, the shaft cannot attack without the tip

    • @sadstupidclown
      @sadstupidclown 3 місяці тому +9

      He isnt newbie man. His voice is old man voice

  • @jenykoo
    @jenykoo 3 місяці тому +53

    I WISH THERE WILL BE AUDIOS US PILOTS TRYING TO EVADE SAM S-400 NO NEED FOR TRANSLATION

    • @МуслимОмаргаджиев-о4к
      @МуслимОмаргаджиев-о4к 2 місяці тому +21

      😂😂😂 запись будет не долгой.

    • @blackbreed6265
      @blackbreed6265 2 місяці тому +2

      There are none!

    • @ntks6720
      @ntks6720 26 днів тому

      Su 35, 34 get killed by s400 more often indeed

    • @СемёнСемёнов-д3э
      @СемёнСемёнов-д3э 9 днів тому

      там записи переговоров не будет. там будет горящее фортепиано после вылета с аэродрома и грустные лица родственников

  • @pollylewis9611
    @pollylewis9611 3 місяці тому +97

    Thank you for explaining what was going on and how a patriot missile tracks a target, this was a near miss for sure wow!

  • @defencebangladesh4068
    @defencebangladesh4068 2 місяці тому +22

    Someone is Jealous. 😅

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  2 місяці тому

      Of what?

    • @sadstupidclown
      @sadstupidclown 22 дні тому +9

      ​@@CWLemoine
      My suspicion is that narcissism is an exclusively аmerican invention.

  • @TheStowAway594
    @TheStowAway594 3 місяці тому +274

    I bet those pilots didn't sleep easy that night. I don't care what country the pilot's from, evading any kind of modern SAMs is absolutely terrifying. Also they should have bought a lottery ticket right after landing, because it's obviously their lucky day.

    • @TeemarkConvair
      @TeemarkConvair 3 місяці тому +24

      no to the lottery they USED their luck,,

    • @ninjalectualx
      @ninjalectualx 3 місяці тому +13

      That's not how luck works. Flipping a coin and getting heads 9 times in a row doesn't make it more likely the next will be tails

    • @alispeed5095
      @alispeed5095 3 місяці тому

      @@TeemarkConvair Depends on how you think of luck, some think that lack is a phenomena that happens for a duration not a moment. I too believe so, when am lucky, l normally try another thing and sometimes it holds. So l think this individual thinks so too

    • @robrob9050
      @robrob9050 3 місяці тому +3

      @@TheStowAway594 Yes..luck..higher spirits - it is skill my friend, the skill.

    • @drewd2
      @drewd2 3 місяці тому +5

      It sounds like the Patriot shot from pretty far out and they picked it up quickly, which gave them the best opportunity to survive the attack.

  • @markpolshin1633
    @markpolshin1633 3 місяці тому +77

    Confirmed Info: He had a wingman, and the wingman launched a couple anti radar missles back at the patriot

    • @robrob9050
      @robrob9050 2 місяці тому +1

      Source?

    • @mugilangp2148
      @mugilangp2148 2 місяці тому

      Trust me bro​@@robrob9050

    • @markpolshin1633
      @markpolshin1633 2 місяці тому +1

      @@robrob9050 shii my boy i lowkey cant find the interview with the pilot, someone interviewed him, some russian military blogger

    • @СемёнСемёнов-д3э
      @СемёнСемёнов-д3э 9 днів тому

      ведомого не было. был истребитель прикрытия. он пустил ракету по радару патриота

    • @markpolshin1633
      @markpolshin1633 9 днів тому

      @ wingman это не ведомый, это как раз истребитель прикрытия)

  • @TXLorenzo
    @TXLorenzo 2 місяці тому +32

    If that Patriot battery doesn't pick up and move soon, it will be getting a visit from Mr. Iskander.

    • @thestruggler3338
      @thestruggler3338 2 місяці тому +1

      Yes but Mr Iskander had to take a break because Uncle Himars was on to him.

    • @TXLorenzo
      @TXLorenzo 2 місяці тому +12

      @@thestruggler3338 That's OK, because Mr. Khinzal and Mr. FAB 3000 will more than make up for it.

    • @thestruggler3338
      @thestruggler3338 2 місяці тому +2

      @@TXLorenzo Mr Fab more likely to end up bombing own country lol Mr Khinzal is one of those upper class cousins you don't have the money to play with very often...

    • @TXLorenzo
      @TXLorenzo 2 місяці тому +2

      @@thestruggler3338 I wonder why the lights are out in Kiev tonight?

    • @thestruggler3338
      @thestruggler3338 2 місяці тому +1

      @@TXLorenzo it will be lights out for you know who real soon and the show will be over. Meanwhile there are plenty of lights and balls of heat around your refineries.

  • @Chuck8541
    @Chuck8541 3 місяці тому +57

    First time reading Mover's comments, and it's crazy how many folks are GCI, Su-34 and Patriot missile system experts. lol 😂

    • @arthurmoore9488
      @arthurmoore9488 3 місяці тому +15

      To be fair, there are some people here who really are. Plus plenty of people, like me, who want to share whatever bits of trivia we've learned over time. It's just hard to put that nuance of "I'm not an expert, but here's an interesting fact."

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 3 місяці тому +1

      This is UA-cam, many chair jockeys act like an “expert” in the comments.

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 3 місяці тому +1

      @@arthurmoore9488 An excellent, underrated comment.

    • @gracewnell6464
      @gracewnell6464 2 місяці тому +2

      The same people in 2020 were immunology experts, 2022 left them with a new career, as international foreign policy and warfare scholars. I can't wait for their next adventure.

  • @ThePhantomRocket
    @ThePhantomRocket 3 місяці тому +33

    There is a version where someone roughly geolocated the positions of the aircraft and animated it.

  • @JamesTKirk-ez6ip
    @JamesTKirk-ez6ip 2 місяці тому +31

    Before you poo poo Russia look into the history of bith countries.
    Were all the wars the U.S. fought just, no especially in recent decades.
    Russia is fighting a just war.
    Just compare it to the U.S. , UK or Israel.

    • @OC3707
      @OC3707 2 місяці тому

      You're delusional and brainwashed. Intentionally hitting maternity hospitals and apartments with missiles is your idea of just?

    • @trisk999
      @trisk999 2 місяці тому

      @@OC3707 Donbass?

    • @user-SergeyK.
      @user-SergeyK. 14 днів тому +4

      @@trisk999I am a Russian from Donbass. And I say that Ukraine started all this shit back in 2014, and Russia has been trying to persuade all this time, and only started acting at 22

  • @clivehamman5018
    @clivehamman5018 2 місяці тому +199

    Amazing how Americans think all their junk is the best.

    • @bobtate6812
      @bobtate6812 2 місяці тому +6

      Ya like Patriot limited angle view missing Yemeni skuds

    • @zazu-xt4py
      @zazu-xt4py 2 місяці тому +11

      Some Americans. Just some of us fall for the hoopla.

    • @EagleDescent
      @EagleDescent 2 місяці тому +4

      Without the ground crew telling the pilot the heading of the missile, the jet would've been hit

    • @ramironunezsandoval3317
      @ramironunezsandoval3317 2 місяці тому

      @@EagleDescentde eso se trata trabajo en equipo

    • @forfun6273
      @forfun6273 2 місяці тому +7

      Why doesn’t Russia have full blown air superiority in Ukraine? You guys have the best stuff right? It should be no problem. But you guys seem to be struggling against your old technology and old U.S. technology.

  • @alasseon99
    @alasseon99 3 місяці тому +61

    No Sukhois were harmed during filming this event, only Patriot was Iskandered.

    • @ChucksSEADnDEAD
      @ChucksSEADnDEAD 3 місяці тому

      Two decoys lol

    • @killman369547
      @killman369547 2 місяці тому +7

      @@ChucksSEADnDEAD Decoys don't explode that vigorously.

    • @zemm9003
      @zemm9003 2 місяці тому

      ​@@ChucksSEADnDEAD it is very difficult to decoy an AD missile system because they usually are not spotted visually first.

    • @mdanikhossain2247
      @mdanikhossain2247 2 місяці тому +2

      ​@@ChucksSEADnDEADThose decoys were launching interceptor missiles lol. You may wanna check out the drone video footage that had spotted the patriot battery. The Patriot tried to destroy the incoming Russian missile(s) but failed.

    • @StefanBlagojevic
      @StefanBlagojevic Місяць тому

      @alasseon99 Amen!

  • @Kinny202
    @Kinny202 3 місяці тому +64

    NGL
    Hard not to root for the Su34 pilot
    Great job!

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 3 місяці тому +10

      @@Kinny202 the fact many does just because of origin is baffling. They can’t appreciate skill unless its theirs

    • @Kinny202
      @Kinny202 3 місяці тому

      @@FlyLeah I don’t think Gonky would have meh’d it 😊. CW is predictable in his responses but what’s to complain when his stuff if free and fun to watch.

    • @vmasing1965
      @vmasing1965 2 місяці тому

      Would you cheer for a Nazi pilot who kills Ukrainians as well? The circumstances how both pilots ended up in Ukraine are exactly the same...
      It's a serious question. You should think about it.

  • @stevannikolovski
    @stevannikolovski 2 місяці тому +55

    "I was kinda rooting for patriot, it is russian jet afterall" Every time i see american jets i am rooting for S300.

    • @EstraNiato
      @EstraNiato 2 місяці тому +35

      The hilarious part is that Patriot ended up scoring the first F-16 kill of the war

    • @zartic4life
      @zartic4life 2 місяці тому +2

      Majority are s400's. Some s500s coming into play also.

    • @theorncampbell4432
      @theorncampbell4432 2 місяці тому +6

      @@EstraNiato Naw, they womped a few on the ground. In typical style, Ukraine released social media videos of the pilots and ground crew talking about how they were going to take Crimea and Moscow. To no ones surprise, the video revealed the location of the jets. Iskanders inbound.

  • @steffenjespersen247
    @steffenjespersen247 3 місяці тому +16

    It is such a life saver having a radar operator watching your back.
    He would have been toast without it.

    • @Escapist_on_the_Moon
      @Escapist_on_the_Moon 2 місяці тому

      Isn such life save, is daily job by airspace force russia. Sometimes wrong, Sometimes succesfull.

  • @BrownBabyJesus
    @BrownBabyJesus 2 місяці тому +9

    Didn't Ukraine lose their first F16 to a patriot recently? Stuffs getting awkward 🤦

  • @Tod_oMal
    @Tod_oMal 2 місяці тому +19

    I guess the Ukrainian pilot on the F-16, was not so lucky avoiding the Patriot...

  • @alevi9340
    @alevi9340 2 місяці тому +15

    CALLING METRICS UNITS JUST TELL ME HOW IGNORANT YOU ARE.

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  2 місяці тому +7

      SORRY FOR TRIGGERING YOU COMMIE BUT NAME A NON COMMIE COUNTRY THAT USES METRIC IN AVIATION. I WILL WAIT.

    • @pragmaticno1630
      @pragmaticno1630 2 місяці тому +1

      🤣🤣Commie haha

  • @Juandinggong
    @Juandinggong 3 місяці тому +17

    Intially video mention how the communication took place through placement on the screen in different places. I believe ground controller did a great job. They have a better picture of the situation and guide the pilot. He even encourages him to keep on maneuvering when they sounds exhausted. I have listened to this few time to understand it better.

    • @АсНур-л3о
      @АсНур-л3о 2 місяці тому +1

      При этом американские и западные ,,эксперты,, говорят что это плохая система, когда контроль имея лучшую осведомленность говорит что делать пилоту. Они говорят пилот должен быть самостоятельным, и сам принимать решения куда лететь , потому что так у них принято.

    • @Juandinggong
      @Juandinggong 2 місяці тому

      @@АсНур-л3о idk what your comment says my brother! I can’t translate into English

    • @pavel3596
      @pavel3596 2 місяці тому

      @@Juandinggong Translated by browser: "At the same time, American and Western “experts” say that this is a bad system when control, having better awareness, tells the pilot what to do. They say a pilot should be independent and make his own decisions about where to fly, because that’s what they do."

    • @Juandinggong
      @Juandinggong 2 місяці тому +1

      @@pavel3596 i believe the system that Russians use were based on not having jets with very powerful radar because ground radars would tell them whats going on. In the US Jets tends to have more powerful radars and AWCS support and that is why pilots tend to not rely on the ground control. At least that is what i think is the case.

    • @pavel3596
      @pavel3596 2 місяці тому

      @@Juandinggong I was translating. Some browsers have the capability. Only Firefox seems to not offer the translate button. A pity.

  • @ernestocamachoestrada6571
    @ernestocamachoestrada6571 3 місяці тому +52

    Of course, for many on this channel, it is not the same as for me, but the best thing is the total defeat of the Patriot system that was in ambush. The SU 34's mission was not SEAD, it was CAS to destroy enemy fortifications, the SU 35 in the air was SEAD and air escort. I say total defeat because the SU 34 returned home thanks to the good work of the pilot and his controllers and a few hours later the radar and two Patriot launchers in ambush were destroyed. Fewer weapons in fascist hands.

    • @V12F1Demon
      @V12F1Demon 2 місяці тому

      Well said. We fought WW2 only to prop this shit up again for some spooks with an agenda!

  • @ВасилийПетров-ш6н
    @ВасилийПетров-ш6н 2 місяці тому +13

    The last part, that was not shown - is the most important. «Sosite nogi»!

  • @zartic4life
    @zartic4life 2 місяці тому +11

    Despite 99% of the planet uses metric it never ceases to amaze Americans 😂 Anyways ridiculous performance by that pilot that was insane.

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  2 місяці тому +1

      Who uses metric in aviation?

    • @Mayank_11111
      @Mayank_11111 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@CWLemoine everyone except MUrican 😂

    • @alexanderlee1077
      @alexanderlee1077 2 місяці тому

      @@CWLemoine Ukraine ))

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  2 місяці тому

      @@alexanderlee1077 Nope. The only three countries that use metric in aviation are China, Russia, and North Korea. Even Ukraine uses feet/knots now.

    • @zartic4life
      @zartic4life 6 днів тому +1

      @@CWLemoine so only 1/3rd of the world population. Besides that every single pilot needs to know how to fly using metrics at least commercially my arrogant friend.

  • @samgreenwood8313
    @samgreenwood8313 3 місяці тому +54

    I was under the impression that they were largely not flying AWACS due to crew and airframe shortages, but this sounds like an AWACs controller, not sure how a ground controller could detect a launch at 80 clicks without a powerful airborne radar that could see that far; would also explain how they could see headings/speeds/distances/closure rates etc.

    • @ozzyphil74
      @ozzyphil74 3 місяці тому +13

      That's not what I heard. They pulled them further back after a couple were downed but they still fly them

    • @charlie15627
      @charlie15627 3 місяці тому

      Yeah, they're using their AWACS as bait for the Patriots.
      They fly them just under 300 miles from the line of contact. If Kiev moved the Patriots up to the line they might get a shot at one but it could easily evade, from that distance and the Patriot would be guaranteed to be spotted and destroyed.

    • @ThePppp89
      @ThePppp89 3 місяці тому +16

      From what I understand they still have AWACS up, but while they previously were close enough to cover most of Ukraine, they are now only close enough to cover the frontlines.

    • @west3979
      @west3979 3 місяці тому +6

      They don't fly AWACS much because it's just *not* a Russian thing. Ground-controlled intercept has been their modus operandi since the Soviet times. The Patriot launch was detected by the pilot's wingman, not the ground controller though.

    • @dejavudeux
      @dejavudeux 3 місяці тому +12

      ​@west3979 the lunch was detected by the AWACS from Russia not ground control

  • @komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257
    @komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257 3 місяці тому +19

    Not as cool as Serbia shooting down an F-117 use SA-2 From the 60s and radars still using vacuum tubes

  • @Shilka242
    @Shilka242 2 місяці тому +11

    Patriot operators now can draw F16 image on the launcher 😅

  • @SashaTibelius
    @SashaTibelius 2 місяці тому +12

    Su-34 the most beautiful jet!

  • @ZingaraJoe
    @ZingaraJoe 2 місяці тому +10

    What do I think. There would not be this very expensive blood bath by both sides if the arms merchants had not been pushing for Ukraine's inclusion into NATO. This is/was contrary to many verbal assurances by various US officials over the years that NATO would not be expanded to USSR / Russia's borders. Lot of bad karma - these people don't know the meaning of guilt or conscience, alien emotions to sociopaths.

  • @Oscar-ds2vb
    @Oscar-ds2vb 2 місяці тому +12

    As a "europoor", american bloodthirst has always puzzled and disgusted me. they way you talk about other people and their countries, the way you use other countries to fight your wars and offer them on the altar of blood for your corporations profit is so alien to me..and I guess to most of us non americans. are the people that own and have the power in the US even human?

    • @ВосславьСолнце-е5х
      @ВосславьСолнце-е5х Місяць тому +2

      Вы тоже чувствуете их высокомерное отношение и гордыню к остальному миру?😅

  • @Sosyy79
    @Sosyy79 2 місяці тому +3

    a perfect example of coordination between AWACS and the Su-34 w pilot

  • @Chaldon-hl6yk
    @Chaldon-hl6yk 2 місяці тому +9

    time for new video F-16 vs Patriot

  • @vasbadrou8414
    @vasbadrou8414 3 місяці тому +34

    That missile system can't even defend itself

    • @V12F1Demon
      @V12F1Demon 2 місяці тому

      It's trash. They never talk about the S300 that almost brought down and Israeli F35 over Syria.

  • @cyr8913
    @cyr8913 2 місяці тому +5

    Brilliant pilot - top class !

  • @libertarianbydefault
    @libertarianbydefault 2 місяці тому +11

    CWLemoine , not impressed, huh? Would you want to try dodging 3 x S-400 missiles in an F-15E? If you succeeded, would you have considered that to be "nothing special"? Pettiness is not becoming, malevolence towards those who have never wronged you - even less so.

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  2 місяці тому +1

      First, I wouldn't want to fly a MudHen because I have no use for a passenger. Second, not impressed? What did you want me to do? Scream like a schoolgirl? Don't be an idiot. There is no pettiness or malevolence. I reacted to the comms. That's it. Don't drag me into your bullshit.

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 Місяць тому +1

      @@CWLemoine All you had to do at the end is to say well done to the Russian pilot, but your expressions on your face said it all.

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  Місяць тому

      @@lastmanstanding9389 that's dumb.

    • @zloyvinnipuh2411
      @zloyvinnipuh2411 8 днів тому +1

      @@lastmanstanding9389 чувак просто очень завидует русскому пилоту. Американцы же думают, что они избранные, а тут какой-то "орк" показал высший пилотаж.

  • @harveyianfroilan4
    @harveyianfroilan4 2 місяці тому +6

    This video is a mistake. It should be Patriot Missile vs F16. 😅

  • @tstorm83
    @tstorm83 3 місяці тому +52

    “Patriots are not easy to defend against.” Mover took this quote from the British circa 1776. 🇺🇸

    • @JohnJones-k9d
      @JohnJones-k9d 3 місяці тому +11

      How about.
      Us air force look at our invisible non shoot down able B117.
      Serbian SAM commander using a 30 up year old obsolete Russian Sam, hold my beer.
      US pilot “oh shit we’ve been shot down”.
      Very embarrassing to gphave your newest latest plane shot down by obsolete junk, let alone a new Russian sam

    • @tstorm83
      @tstorm83 3 місяці тому +1

      You missed the joke.

    • @Billybutchercunt9
      @Billybutchercunt9 3 місяці тому

      Bradley destroyed a t90😂 cry​@@JohnJones-k9d

    • @pmeagle
      @pmeagle 3 місяці тому +4

      @@JohnJones-k9d He's referring to Patriots, what the american militia that fought for indipendance was called against the British in 1776, against the Loyalists that were in support of British rule.

  • @David-nr6uz
    @David-nr6uz 2 місяці тому +57

    Russian old su 34 won the most advanced NATO equipment 😂

    • @hertzwave8001
      @hertzwave8001 2 місяці тому +12

      >old
      >entered service in 2014

    • @galileo_rs
      @galileo_rs 2 місяці тому +11

      @@hertzwave8001 It entered service with the Russian Air Force in 2014 but it is a 1990s design.

    • @japutaruko8052
      @japutaruko8052 2 місяці тому

      ​@@galileo_rsSU-34 is the latest cutting edge tech dude. Its not 1990s tech.

    • @galileo_rs
      @galileo_rs 2 місяці тому +5

      @@japutaruko8052 It was created in the 1990s

    • @Sorum777
      @Sorum777 2 місяці тому +1

      @@galileo_rs in 90s its was just prototype not done fighterjet, serial production start on 2014

  • @agumatthew9149
    @agumatthew9149 2 місяці тому +30

    Bro the pilot breathing is crazy

    • @Kosti2332
      @Kosti2332 2 місяці тому +7

      He is literally fighting for his life and you can hear that. Glad he came out alive and brought his WO back home, too.

    • @ESB-f3z
      @ESB-f3z 2 місяці тому

      It's not difficult. Everyone could do that

    • @javiermedina4228
      @javiermedina4228 2 місяці тому +9

      Just imagine the G force on the pilot on those manouvers AND the psycological pressure.. Body pressure 100% + Psycological Pressure 100%.

    • @ESB-f3z
      @ESB-f3z 2 місяці тому

      @@javiermedina4228 it's all Putin's propaganda. Everyone can do it.

    • @SnoW-pk9zo
      @SnoW-pk9zo 2 місяці тому

      @@ESB-f3zlol

  • @bossdog1480
    @bossdog1480 2 місяці тому +7

    Patriot couldn't hit a barn door on a clear day.

  • @altair_204
    @altair_204 3 місяці тому +17

    One report said there was another covering aircraft carrying an anti-radiation missile precisely for this purpose, who launched at the Patriot PAC-3

    • @gilianrampart8514
      @gilianrampart8514 3 місяці тому +4

      Excellent!
      They have hit many Patriots!

    • @motordyne_super37
      @motordyne_super37 2 місяці тому +3

      @@gilianrampart8514lol no they haven’t

    • @V12F1Demon
      @V12F1Demon 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@motordyne_super37Er.. yes they have. Cope.

    • @motordyne_super37
      @motordyne_super37 2 місяці тому

      @@V12F1Demon lol no they have not i have way more info than some random Russian fan boy stop believing everything you see on the internet both sides have been lying and overexaggerate everything

  • @adityaprakash50
    @adityaprakash50 2 місяці тому +8

    What we are not talking about here is that the patriot missile failed its purpose. But Mad respect for the pilot.

    • @mattiasdahlstrom2024
      @mattiasdahlstrom2024 2 місяці тому +3

      AA officers always argue (after they miss to shoot down the plane) that the mission was aborted and thus AA did its job.

    • @ryosuketakahashi3232
      @ryosuketakahashi3232 7 днів тому

      I mean, yea. Either way, troops' lives were protected even if the enemy airmen survived

  • @allankaunga9863
    @allankaunga9863 2 місяці тому +7

    Very impressive for a bomber outrun patriot missile, I wonder how su 35 would perform

  • @igorbt6706
    @igorbt6706 2 місяці тому +2

    Jet pilots are really special. Very few qualify as fighter jet pilots. Respect all of them

  • @bencrd6150
    @bencrd6150 2 місяці тому +4

    Magic weapons as patriot can only hit other magic weapons as F16!

  • @ghettostreamlabs5724
    @ghettostreamlabs5724 3 місяці тому +27

    I spent my entire military career (a whopping 4 years lol) with the 1st 203rd ADA (PATRIOT) unit here in Athens, Alabama. I know nothing about flying jets but will only say that I have seen a PATRIOT launch up close and personal, and it is by far the fastest thing I have ever seen go across the horizon, and that was over 20 years ago. They never would tell me "officially" what the maximum speed was, but I did hear several brass mention >Mach 6. No idea if that is true - but it can 100% be across the horizon within seconds of coming out of the launcher. If the eye "had" him and he evaded, good on him. That system does not F around even at 30+ years old now.

    • @djinn666
      @djinn666 3 місяці тому +6

      Why guess? The first distance measurement was 80 km and in the original video it took another 1 minute and 50 seconds before the explosion was called. That gives an average speed of 700 m/s or mach 2.
      Maybe the max speed is a little higher, but there's an acceleration phase and post-burn maneuvering would've slowed it.