Quantity theory of money | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 45

  • @ynn1759
    @ynn1759 3 роки тому +23

    Khan literally knows everything whoa thanks for sharing your knowledge with us!

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP Рік тому +3

      It's like there's nothing he khan't know...

  • @justinabegg730
    @justinabegg730 2 роки тому +3

    thanks, you made it clear to understand the relationship between money supply and price index (inflation)!

  • @CanaanZhou2002
    @CanaanZhou2002 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for your explanation! These extreme examples really help.

  • @crazieeez
    @crazieeez 2 роки тому

    It is a qualitative look. Reality has time.

  • @emelito888
    @emelito888 6 років тому +34

    At first I thought it said quantum theory of money lmao

    • @theelderelk5582
      @theelderelk5582 5 років тому +5

      Yeah :( money that changes if you observe it

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP Рік тому +1

      That would be an awesome theory though...

  • @cloroxbleach5105
    @cloroxbleach5105 6 років тому +10

    Hello

  • @ENAIRAMA1
    @ENAIRAMA1 6 років тому +6

    I thought I could applied this to my own economy LOL! And if it does, how applicable is it and for what circumstances.

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP Рік тому

      Out of curiosity, what do you consider to be your own economy?

  • @edlitwak2857
    @edlitwak2857 Рік тому

    in 08 the banks did NOT put the money in the economy, they shored up there balance sheet and did not loan it out

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP Рік тому

    Quantity theory of money? More like "Khan Academy keeps helping us to study!"

  • @deborahsakazhila4068
    @deborahsakazhila4068 4 роки тому +3

    Can this be used to explain the classical model of monetary policy?

  • @bargdaffy1535
    @bargdaffy1535 2 роки тому

    Just an example New Zealand has a GDP of $200 Billion annually.

  • @oddwork2183
    @oddwork2183 6 років тому

    Great

  • @jamesmorton7881
    @jamesmorton7881 3 роки тому +1

    Velocity is at record low. GDP is inflated by financial returns (unproductive)

    • @deltasource56
      @deltasource56 2 роки тому

      8.5 percent as of april 2022 says your wrong

  • @pajeetsingh
    @pajeetsingh Рік тому

    So inflation is a monetary "phenomenon" and has nothing to with rich people hoarding assets and then asking for higher price?
    Like houses?

  • @MooShaka89
    @MooShaka89 6 років тому +1

    This is quite close to how Austrian economists think when it comes to monetary policy

  • @khirabdhitanaya8931
    @khirabdhitanaya8931 4 роки тому

    Can you please explain Fischer's approach?

  • @courseconceptsacademy4546
    @courseconceptsacademy4546 4 роки тому

    fudge factor

  • @frankiepatron9834
    @frankiepatron9834 2 роки тому

    Qefeseral reserve can tac it

  • @s73squee
    @s73squee 3 роки тому

    How could you translate this into crypto stats such as cdd

  • @thembanitheone
    @thembanitheone 4 роки тому +1

    "Velocity of money" ?👀

  • @chaimaaharmouche8151
    @chaimaaharmouche8151 2 роки тому

    i don't get how p.y equal to nominal gdp

    • @zanecoates7082
      @zanecoates7082 2 роки тому

      We have the price we paid (p) times the amount of total goods/services in the economy (y). So this gives us nominal gdp which is the current "inflated" perception of what our economy is worth. This is why the number is usually above one for P because it is factoring in inflation.

  • @tuckervskele8024
    @tuckervskele8024 3 роки тому

    Scary MIT and IIT bombayx gateways till Loyal And Royal Gates silver and gold

  • @nftmojo79
    @nftmojo79 2 роки тому

    How do I calculate price level?

  • @DarkMelodies-hv9wf
    @DarkMelodies-hv9wf 6 років тому +3

    Bruh this explanation is not good. its the first time in saying this

    • @gauravlakhotia2279
      @gauravlakhotia2279 6 років тому +2

      Why?

    • @Tetragrammaton22
      @Tetragrammaton22 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah you can't just say it's not good without explaining why it's not good.

    • @collinblatchford
      @collinblatchford Рік тому

      To be fair he's explaining a circular theory so it's shouldn't make sense. A*B=C*D makes as much sense as MV=PY.

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP Рік тому

      What specific issue(s) did you have with it?