Modernist Apologists and the New Theology: What Happened To Catholicism? Episode 6

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лют 2025
  • Modernist Apologists and the New Theology
    This is a preview. Watch the full video at meretradition....
    MODERNISM BOOK: sophiainstitut...
    MEN'S CONFERENCE: canadianmartyr...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @authorityfigure1630
    @authorityfigure1630 17 днів тому +13

    When people in comment sections on popular channels say you’re crazy and no one should listen to you. You’re doing something right. Keep it up, Kennedy!

    • @aloyalcatholic5785
      @aloyalcatholic5785 16 днів тому

      More in more in my last few years of life, I am of that opinion. I remember a time when "conventional" opinion meant "truthiness" a priori. No longer.

  • @glennb2819
    @glennb2819 15 днів тому

    Yup. This was a good episode mr. Kennedy. Thanks.
    This was more of modernism rather than getting lost in politics etc

  • @philcortens5214
    @philcortens5214 17 днів тому +1

    "Oodles". Now there's a word I haven't heard for a long time. That's what I love about Mr. Hall.

  • @mariimichelle
    @mariimichelle 17 днів тому +8

    Modernism and “Modernists” is not Catholicism or Catholic!!!

  • @PalermoTrapani
    @PalermoTrapani 17 днів тому +1

    Kennedy: I listened to your presentation here. You made some good points but there are some I disagree with, but that is ok, you might disagree with some of mine.
    Regarding Cardinal Ratzinger and his theological studies after WW2, he did think that Thomism was to dominate in Catholic Theology starting with the Council of Trent so in his Doctoral studies, he did not use Thomism as his theological framework. Rather in his 2 Doctoral Dissertations he relied on 1) The work of Saint Augustine (Patristic) and 2) Saint Bonaventure who relied more on Plato than Aristotle and was seen as someone whose theology while 100% orthodox, took a different approach than his Dominican contemporary Saint Thomas Aquinas. So regarding the New Theology, yes some of those guys did go to the full modernist that you talk about (Hans Kung would be the most famous example).
    On the other hand, Fr. Ratzinger before he became Bishop and Cardinal was in the "Communio" camp of the New Theology vs. the other camp that did go full modernist "Hans Kung" and American "Charles Curran", etc who did publicly as theologians openly criticize Doctrines of the Church. Cardinal Ratzinger and then as Pope Benedict and others like him are the ones who after the Vatican II council as technology became more and more a part of our daily life were responsible for the works of the Church Fathers being widely available for Catholic laity.
    I first bought Fr. Jurgens 3 volume Set on the Church Fathers back in 1993 when I was in my later 20's in graduate school, by around 1998 with the internet now in full swing New Advent was online with more of the Church Fathers available as were the Reformed Scholar Phillip Scaff's works on a protestant site. Thus, Catholic Apologist (lay Apostolates) were already integrating the Church Fathers into catechesis and apologetics, as did the 1992 Catechism of John Paul II. All that with YT today and the Church Fathers is in my view the biggest evangelization tool the Catholic Church has to bring secularist who are interested in Christianity broadly into the Catholic Church and bring back protestants from various ecclesial communities [Corporate reunion is no longer a viable option with any of those communities] back into the Catholic Church.
    Anyway, from someone who attends Mass in 2 parishes, both with reverent celebrations of the 1970 Missal and someone who is more aligned with those who attend the TLM than the progressive spirit of V2 types (not that common anymore as priests in my diocese over last 15 years or so very orthodox in homilies and Liturgy) and charismatic types (which thankfully are not prevalent much more in my Diocese).
    Cheers and God Bless and best wishes with your book on the Charismatic movement.

  • @BigPapaPerique
    @BigPapaPerique 17 днів тому +3

    Have you done any videos on theology of the body? My diocese mandated we reach it and needed to get certified. As I was listening i I got the impression that it's a kind of bottom-up theology.
    It sounded like it endorsed the categorical imperative of kant and seemed to place way too much focus on the body and being in communion with others as the trueist expression of the image of God (which made me wounder what about the saints who lived in apart from others?) With marraige being the best analogy for the trinity.
    Just my gut gave me red flags.

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 16 днів тому

      Bottom up sorta like the joke about Kamala being “heels up “

    • @BigPapaPerique
      @BigPapaPerique 16 днів тому

      @glennso47 well they seemed to make conclusions about anthropology and God based on the subjective experince of the persone. Which is what personalism and phenomenology does. Objective true as confirmed by the subjective. My gut tells me it should be reversed. The subjective ought to be confirmed by the objective. But I done have a masters in theology or anything. Nor am I a saint.

  • @flyingtigers3747
    @flyingtigers3747 17 днів тому +1

    *Bravo Kennedy.*

  • @1951kvk
    @1951kvk 16 днів тому

    Sometimes I envy Orthodox Jews. They have a culture and community based on their beliefs We need something similar in Traditional Catholicism.

    • @MsCardio1
      @MsCardio1 16 днів тому

      You bet. they follow all sorts of rule on purification and ritual.....the perfect Pharisees........Oh and what was Jesus' impression of the Pharisees. "decorated tombs...beautiful on the outside...and inside full of dead men's bones" We see that in Trad Catholics today who worry about whether they are sinning by not genuflecting!!! Assholes!!!

  • @MsCardio1
    @MsCardio1 16 днів тому

    Sir: do you view the move from the absolute power of kings/ queens to the more democratic regimes of Western society as a good or a bad thing?

    • @lucidlocomotive2014
      @lucidlocomotive2014 16 днів тому

      Obviously a bad thing

    • @MsCardio1
      @MsCardio1 15 днів тому

      @@lucidlocomotive2014 obviously says a lot about you ...and me. I despise kings and queens "Absolute power corrupts absolutely"

    • @lucidlocomotive2014
      @lucidlocomotive2014 15 днів тому

      @@MsCardio1 that quote is from anti Catholics, this is a Catholic channel so yeah obviously we will side against the French Revolution and the enlightenment philosophy that’s kind of a big part of church teaching read the syllabus of errors a magisterial document

  • @stmartin17773
    @stmartin17773 16 днів тому

    Guaranteed modernists don't pray the Rosary as requested by the BVM. They become easy pickings for the real exponents of spiritual pride.

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 16 днів тому

      They added to the rosary to include the “Luminous “ mysteries. And some of them recite the Chaplet of Divine Mercy because it is shorter and quicker than the rosary. I’ve been to a place like that. Saint Jimmy Bobs church. 😂

  • @TimothyAdams-ln2jr
    @TimothyAdams-ln2jr 16 днів тому

    What happened to RCC? Heresy, sexual degeneracy, corruption.

  • @eaglehawkpanther
    @eaglehawkpanther 17 днів тому

    well said

  • @BronxCat
    @BronxCat 17 днів тому +4

    Reinvented modernism, tsk

  • @philipschaffer9414
    @philipschaffer9414 17 днів тому

    My grandpa fought in WW1 .

  • @philipschaffer9414
    @philipschaffer9414 17 днів тому

    Sounds almost like hegelian synthesis

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 16 днів тому

      Whatever that is. 🤷‍♂️