Su-30MK demonstration flight. This two seats fighter looks really big. Slow and graceful flying. Too bad in 2007 & 2009 he doesn't perform Colbit maneuvers.
@popmerde The Raptor is another story, the US did a hell of a job with its stablity and performance, but it's the TVC that makes it agile.If it wasn't for the TVS,I'd be surprized if it would actually be able to turn. Ontopic:the Su-30MK is one of the most maneuverable aircraft on the planet, no need to compare it with anything.
@mauricioalfredo83 The Su-27's chassis is truly an amazing piece of art.It is aerodynamically neutral, and that's what gives it its agility.Many countries have developed fighters with a great level of maneuverability, but no nation has ever achieved what the Russians did with the Su-27. P.S. Just for the record, the F-22's TVC is 2D ;)
Extraordinary plane - for an air show but here's some hard facts: the Dogfight Era is gone, long since replaced with today's Stealth Era. If you don't have it, then hey, you ain't got it. This jet's maneuverability is phenomenal but its modern era fighter capability is no match for cutting edge stealth aircraft and no one even comes close to the level of US stealth technology. Sorry, Ruskies - that's just the way it is.
Oh yes. While you are totally invisible to the enemy, a red dot will appear on your screen. You will launch a missile and some seconds later the red dot will disappear. Just like those F-22 games you play. Sorry yankees, but reality is a little more complicated than that. Even today, when you fight those great wars against incompetent air forces in the middle east you don't fire until you get visual confirmation, because you just can't identify the dot you see on the screen, when there is a dot.
So, you are telling me that if I fire an anti-radiation missile, like the russians have now, to destroy or at least to force the AWACS to turn the radar off, the precious, expensive and "stealthy" f-22 will be blind? I have another question. What do you think is cheaper and more logical? To build a whole fighter around the concept of stealth or to develop a radar able to counter that stealth? For how long do you think the stealth technology will be usefull against advanced, competent air forces? My point is that one technology anulates the other. In the end you can't throw away dogfights.
Cumulus Nimbus Russian radiation missiles can't travel ground to air 300 miles distant where AWACS operate at. Every air force on earth is at least 5 years (conservative estimate) behind US GEN 5 stealth. When they catch up, US will be operating at GEN 7. Everyone other than US is just another wannabe in effective St Technology. Last dog fight was during Iraq war 25 years ago when US showed up with GEN 1 and everyone fled to Iran or died. Dogfights? Gone. Face it.
That missile is air to air. Please, cut that "generation" talk. It's just a mindless Cliché. Propaganda from your DoD and the military industrial complex to take away your tax money. They say they can deliver a product that has no way to be proved. And you still believe it.
IRST functions independently of radar.This is what makes for example a MiG-29 capable of a passive stealth attack.Although IRST has a limited range.But once you've got enough heat signature from the target,you don't need a target lock.
The su-30 is still in development, actually Russia and India are in talks to manufactur a new Su-30 with new improvements, guess they will take many things from Su-35BM and improve it
IRST has to be guided to a target somehow.It needs to be shown where the target is, it is a TV camera not an IR seeker (although it can sort of function as one).MiG-29s are capable of stealth attacks only with the use of heat-seeking versions of missiles like the R-24 or R-27, and that's at very limited ranges (about 15km max).
I mean what do you think Sukhoi designers should have done with this aircraft so that it could become better? Is RCS really important? Even very Low observable flying objects can be detected by electro-optical radars.
@gtamodman122 ...Iam agree whit a lot what U said BUT Su27 T10 its the best layout or fighter chasis Ive ever seen...it can performe cobra whitout TVC nozzles and older engines and avionics...americans are at least 20 years behind whit hinges 1D thrus vectoring
OMG, I was watching the video amazed as hell from the incredibly insane agility of the plane, saying myself "Never seen something like that before. Only thing that is missing is the ability to fly backwards." and then 1:56 came. Russians you rule! :-))
No problem, we all have other things to do :) IRST sensors are not really capable of searching for IR emissions because the sky is a vast space and they have no clue where to look.Perhaps in close ranges they can find something, but for longer (read as "combat-efficient) ranges they need something to tell them where to look at. The RQ-170 was most likely hacked, but not detected via IRST.Even visual contact is possible.
I wish Sukhoi had made it even better...but now this poor plane (that could have been a supermaneuverable strike eagle) suffers from lack of modern electronics and a HUGE RCS.
Actually without TVC the F-22's maneuverability would be like an F-18, but with it it comes close to an Su-35 I know its not as maneuverable but is good enough
@popmerde feel free to say it, as long as you're not going to spam your rage on me.It probably will matter,because I'm not American, I live on the other side of the planet, hehe.What I'm saying is that it's a good plane, but it has its disadvantages.Firstly, look at its size.We're talking about an enormous RCS (I've read articles getting it as high as 12m2 (squared).Secondly, despite the fact that it has been heavily modernized, some importance should have been given to the strike role too.
I think that they should have invested in electronics, weapons and low observability.RCS is still an extremely important factor, because EO sensors cannot scan for infrared sources on their own.They are slaved to the radar.In order to lock onto a target with an EO sensor (e.g. an IRST) you need to find that target first with your radar, or another plane should tell your radar where the target is.
Sorry for replying very late. I'm confused.IRST detects objects that give off infrared radiation.I know it will function much more efficiently if the pilot knows where to look for the target.(for example from the source of a hostile airborne radar emitter.) But it doesn't necessarily require target coordination. Yes, the range is limited for IRST and passive stealth attack ,but I don't think that the Low observable RQ-170 has been intercepted by an IRST system!
@tht1drnkrussian I consider it an improved single-seat Su-30.For me, it's not the plane of the year.I'm waiting for the PAK-FA to see if the Russians make their breakthrough in the aircraft market.
@gtamodman122 I wasnt going to insult you or anything, im not like that. Im just telling you this is the future. Yes it is big but you saw it with your own eyes, no american aircraft can do this, not even the raptor.
I love this camouflage, best one.
Master of the sky dancing on his stage, beautiful!
Enough only one word for all Russian planes and pilots. PERFECTION.
Everything else is superfluous.
@popmerde The Raptor is another story, the US did a hell of a job with its stablity and performance, but it's the TVC that makes it agile.If it wasn't for the TVS,I'd be surprized if it would actually be able to turn.
Ontopic:the Su-30MK is one of the most maneuverable aircraft on the planet, no need to compare it with anything.
2:53 great turn!!! amazing
I love the camouflage 🇷🇺👌👍💪
Супер 👍
wow!!!! :)
05:15 Holy..............!
Excellent!
Крутая тьехника пилатьирования , спасибо за видос . 😎
Good plane! we,the Netherlands should buy this plane,far better then the F35!
@mauricioalfredo83 The Su-27's chassis is truly an amazing piece of art.It is aerodynamically neutral, and that's what gives it its agility.Many countries have developed fighters with a great level of maneuverability, but no nation has ever achieved what the Russians did with the Su-27.
P.S. Just for the record, the F-22's TVC is 2D ;)
Extraordinary plane - for an air show but here's some hard facts: the Dogfight Era is gone, long since replaced with today's Stealth Era. If you don't have it, then hey, you ain't got it. This jet's maneuverability is phenomenal but its modern era fighter capability is no match for cutting edge stealth aircraft and no one even comes close to the level of US stealth technology. Sorry, Ruskies - that's just the way it is.
Oh yes. While you are totally invisible to the enemy, a red dot will appear on your screen. You will launch a missile and some seconds later the red dot will disappear. Just like those F-22 games you play. Sorry yankees, but reality is a little more complicated than that. Even today, when you fight those great wars against incompetent air forces in the middle east you don't fire until you get visual confirmation, because you just can't identify the dot you see on the screen, when there is a dot.
That's what the AWACS and drones are for. Recognizing an enemy 200 miles out. What era data book are you learning from? 1960 dog fighting 101?
So, you are telling me that if I fire an anti-radiation missile, like the russians have now, to destroy or at least to force the AWACS to turn the radar off, the precious, expensive and "stealthy" f-22 will be blind? I have another question. What do you think is cheaper and more logical? To build a whole fighter around the concept of stealth or to develop a radar able to counter that stealth? For how long do you think the stealth technology will be usefull against advanced, competent air forces? My point is that one technology anulates the other. In the end you can't throw away dogfights.
Cumulus Nimbus
Russian radiation missiles can't travel ground to air 300 miles distant where AWACS operate at. Every air force on earth is at least 5 years (conservative estimate) behind US GEN 5 stealth. When they catch up, US will be operating at GEN 7. Everyone other than US is just another wannabe in effective St Technology. Last dog fight was during Iraq war 25 years ago when US showed up with GEN 1 and everyone fled to Iran or died. Dogfights? Gone. Face it.
That missile is air to air. Please, cut that "generation" talk. It's just a mindless Cliché. Propaganda from your DoD and the military industrial complex to take away your tax money. They say they can deliver a product that has no way to be proved. And you still believe it.
wooowww!!! This is what I call "SUPERIORITY". Great fighter aircraft, great pilot, thank you Sukhoi, Thank you Russia!!! ;-)
IRST functions independently of radar.This is what makes for example a MiG-29 capable of a passive stealth attack.Although IRST has a limited range.But once you've got enough heat signature from the target,you don't need a target lock.
The su-30 is still in development, actually Russia and India are in talks to manufactur a new Su-30 with new improvements, guess they will take many things from Su-35BM and improve it
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Actually Russians are pretty clean precise people I think they can build a lot.
Mon frére. ❤❤
IRST has to be guided to a target somehow.It needs to be shown where the target is, it is a TV camera not an IR seeker (although it can sort of function as one).MiG-29s are capable of stealth attacks only with the use of heat-seeking versions of missiles like the R-24 or R-27, and that's at very limited ranges (about 15km max).
Amazing :)
Observe @ 2:50 ,3:40, 5:20 You can see thrust vectoring clearly.
By the way, great video! May I know which camera you use?
I know, and so the F-22 is an awesome plane!!!
Gooood 😃😃😃🤘🤘🤘🤘👍👍👍👍👍💪💪💪💪
I love Su30MKI "04" Camuflage !!! ...This is Su27 T10M-11 aka Su37 legacy for sure :) canards...tvc...event to T50
It is a Su-30MKI, in a different paint. Su-30SM came in 2011-12.
❣
I mean what do you think Sukhoi designers should have done with this aircraft so that it could become better?
Is RCS really important? Even very Low observable flying objects can be detected by electro-optical radars.
@gtamodman122 ...Iam agree whit a lot what U said BUT Su27 T10 its the best layout or fighter chasis Ive ever seen...it can performe cobra whitout TVC nozzles and older engines and avionics...americans are at least 20 years behind whit hinges 1D thrus vectoring
where the heck is the fuel tank on this thing ? it looks so that this thigh doesnt have a fueltank is is running magic :P
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🇷🇺
OMG, I was watching the video amazed as hell from the incredibly insane agility of the plane, saying myself "Never seen something like that before. Only thing that is missing is the ability to fly backwards." and then 1:56 came. Russians you rule! :-))
It can fly backward
And inverted backwards
No problem, we all have other things to do :)
IRST sensors are not really capable of searching for IR emissions because the sky is a vast space and they have no clue where to look.Perhaps in close ranges they can find something, but for longer (read as "combat-efficient) ranges they need something to tell them where to look at.
The RQ-170 was most likely hacked, but not detected via IRST.Even visual contact is possible.
Gravity: you SU30sm?
SU30sm: who the fuck are you?
I wish Sukhoi had made it even better...but now this poor plane (that could have been a supermaneuverable strike eagle) suffers from lack of modern electronics and a HUGE RCS.
)))) Даааа... эй F-там какой-то))) есть чем ответить......)))) особенно на взлете, переворот с разворотом )))))
Russian is underrated but they are the best.
Actually without TVC the F-22's maneuverability would be like an F-18, but with it it comes close to an Su-35 I know its not as maneuverable but is good enough
@popmerde feel free to say it, as long as you're not going to spam your rage on me.It probably will matter,because I'm not American, I live on the other side of the planet, hehe.What I'm saying is that it's a good plane, but it has its disadvantages.Firstly, look at its size.We're talking about an enormous RCS (I've read articles getting it as high as 12m2 (squared).Secondly, despite the fact that it has been heavily modernized, some importance should have been given to the strike role too.
GREAT ! God bless Russia ! PAX +
RUSSIA No.1 :-)
Impressive. If I would be the president of my country, I would like to buy some of these. Does Russia sell these only to India?
that's why it has tvc.For super agility
I think that they should have invested in electronics, weapons and low observability.RCS is still an extremely important factor, because EO sensors cannot scan for infrared sources on their own.They are slaved to the radar.In order to lock onto a target with an EO sensor (e.g. an IRST) you need to find that target first with your radar, or another plane should tell your radar where the target is.
Sorry for replying very late.
I'm confused.IRST detects objects that give off infrared radiation.I know it will function much more efficiently if the pilot knows where to look for the target.(for example from the source of a hostile airborne radar emitter.) But it doesn't necessarily require target coordination.
Yes, the range is limited for IRST and passive stealth attack ,but I don't think that the Low observable RQ-170 has been intercepted by an IRST system!
Does Sukhoi take PayPal???????
they take bottles of vodka
This is a free- flying cyborg! Pilot can't make this.))))
@tht1drnkrussian I consider it an improved single-seat Su-30.For me, it's not the plane of the year.I'm waiting for the PAK-FA to see if the Russians make their breakthrough in the aircraft market.
@gtamodman122 no, the su-35 is an improved SU-27, but i see ur point as an improved su-30
Any recommendation?
SUKHOI RULES ALWAYS.
Great video!
anyone know 5:17 manouver name???
Their economy is booming, making these?
drift!
What do you mean?
@gtamodman122 sukhoi DID make something better: SU-35BM
@gtamodman122 I wasnt going to insult you or anything, im not like that. Im just telling you this is the future. Yes it is big but you saw it with your own eyes, no american aircraft can do this, not even the raptor.
so should Australia
Плохо не знаете что значит кобины, 'щимись stels'!
OMFG