10 More Upcoming Movies That Are Already Doomed
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 тра 2024
- These upcoming movies seem destined to bomb.
For more awesome content, check out: whatculture.com/
Follow us on Facebook at: / whatculture
Catch us on Twitter: / whatculture - Розваги
Leslie Nielson was originally hired for parody movies exactly because he wasn't a comedy actor.
People who don't try to be funny are the ones who succeed at being funny
When I was a kid I used to see him in sci-fi reruns.
Exactly. What most people fail to recognize is that Nielsen was playing against type when he did Airplane!
My thought exactly
Yeah, it's okay to give people like him a chance. Everyone can have a sense of humor
No one has any business remaking The Naked Gun.
Given how sensitive people are these days it won't be naked it'll be modestly dressed.
Pamela Anderson is still trying to convince us that she can act 🙄🤦♀️
Right!
A movie like that should never be touched
WTF!!!!!
Don't forget Snow White
Rachel Zelger ruined her career before it has truly began.
@@David-dc3nk Don't forget that mass murder Barbie is now a bigger box office poison than Rachel Zelger .
I think that got shelved (Thank God!) The quote from Disney was "indefinitely". (I think. it's been several months and I have tried to wipe that monstrosity from my brain!)
Gal Gadot currently is a far more toxic name than Rachel Zegler .
@@David-dc3nk And now Gal Gadot is another reason why the movie might be problematic.
Nobody can recreate Leslie Nielsen's portrayal of Frank Drebbin. He had such great timing for humor.😊
I'll give it a chance.
Have you seen Neeson on "Life's too short" he's hilarious as an over serious character
@@rodscarbrough2337 Me too.
It would be like when Steve Martin portrayed Inspector Clouseau.
@@Aurochhunter A great comedic actor taking on a great comedic character and totally failing.
Little known fact: Chad Stahelski (director of all the John Wick movies) was also Brandon Lee's stunt double on The Crow, and was the one who finished playing him in the scenes Lee wasn't able to film.
So is that hopeful, or...?
Yeah, and Shane Black was in Predator then made the Predator. Sometimes, you should know enough to let alone.
@@gottfriedosterbach3907 He's not directing the movie. I just find it funny that everyone's complaining it has John Wick vibes when The Crow inspired John Wick to begin with.
First major use of CGI to replace an actor's face with someone else's.
John Wick 4 was a dud, that final fight scene going up the stairs was a complete joke, it didn't work at all. John Wick 3 was not as good as JW2 and JW1 was a masterpiece of its genre. So, I feel Chad has gone downhill greatly since JW1, this doesn't auger well for his next movie.
JW4 was truly an awful movie from beginning to end, it was so bad, only the diehard fans could say anything good about it. History will prove me right, JW4 will be regarded as a bad movie.
I have to respect that UA-cam chose to insert a commercial of Garfield, into a video detailing why it will fail.
i think those ads are mainly choosen by an A.I. / random. It just recognized that this video mentions "Garfield" therefore it chose an ad matching
@@rgerber thank you for explaining away a joke.
I had the same ad! I do sometimes wonder if we all see the same.
I used Brave and haven't seen a commercial in years on UA-cam... What us that like?
I think Pratt is just overused at this point, we all had the same reaction to Mario, now it’s just getting ridiculous
Wicked just looks like an ESG loan requirement
yep
It totes doesn’t look like Barely Legal ~
It's not that Star Wars fans don't want more Star Wars, it's that the crap Disney has been doing is ruining Star Wars. All blame starts with Kathleen Kennedy, her horrible leadership, her complete lack of vision, and the people who she keeps putting as directors and writers.
My entire group stood up and walked out of TLJ when Luke tossed the lightsaber over his shoulder. I'm talking about 80 people walking out of the theater en masse. Disney Star Wars ceased to exist to me at that moment.
At this point in time I just want it to go to a galaxy far, far away... and stay there.
Andor is amazing.
I still had a great time with the newer movies. Why are Star Wars fans so freaking rabid?
@@witchdoctorteepoStar Wars fans who still are mad about the sequel trilogy seemingly being bad movies just need to stop and move on.
I got something to say: I think there should BE no reboot to "The Crow" I think the film is better the way it is!
you know there was a lot of them, right?
Sadly, there were several reboots, copying almost everything from the original and diluting the effects of the story. These reboots, and the almost non--stop Spiderman reboots, have given me grave doubts about Hollywood's ability to create and invest in original storylines.
@@lfcbpro I know there were a lot of 1990s movies which billed themselves as "Crow 2" and the like but they are abominable.
@@zimriel wow yeah, they were beyond bad.
The first was pretty much perfect, but the follow ups were just a crime, lol.
That would require Hollywood "creatives" to come up with something original, which is clearly beyond their powers.
Destroying EVERYTHING you find remotely likeable is a way of life for these people.
Not sure I'd agree that Eddie Murphy broke it big with Beverley Hills Cop, he was already huge thanks to 48 Hours and Trading Places.
Definitely a stepping stone for his career among the other two films mentioned. Eddie was built, not made. Never broke.
BHC put him over the top..he became mega after BHC, 48 and TP put him on the map for sure but super stardom didnt happen till BHC.
so huge hes basically been replaced by Kevin Hart and Chris Tucker and Chris Rock within the course of 10 years, they act the same, so he wasn't really special. Trading places was interesting, but I wouldn't ever say those two movies made him huge.
@@ravinraven6913 Eddie Murphy at one point was the biggest star on the planet, 1984 onwards was pretty much his time. He is also very much still in demand, can you say the same for either Chris, or any of the others who have tried to replace him? Martin Lawrence, Damon Wayans, Bernie Mac, Tommy Davidson, Jamie Foxx, none of whom captured what Murphy has, Will Smith is close, and even he has some turkeys.
Considering how many also-ran cop movies he's made not called "Beverly Hills Cop" but tried to ween off its success, coming out with a 4th sequel doesn't seem that farfetched.
When I first heard they were remaking The Crow, I was like, "Noooo!!!". Then they revealed Bill Skarsgård was going to be starring, I was like, "...okay, you have my attention". But when they revealed his look, I was like, "...NOOOOOOOO!!!!!"
Lol 😆
But yes, nobody asked for a remake of The Crow.
Bill's a great actor but I definitely do not see that individual playing that part it just doesn't work Brandon Lee made it his own. If you watch how badly the second and third installment of the original crow did It's pretty obvious that series died with Brandon Lee.
@@Arctic_1975 Yeah, I refuse to watch the sequels or TV show. But I totally believe you. They could never really replace him.
@FoggyBadger tv show wasn't bad, actually.
Ya, the look is kinda 90's Goth looking. And not in a good way.
Years ago, I read that Stephen Schwartz wanted Wicked to be an animated feature. Sorry he didn't get his wish.
"herrr derrr animation is for kids derr....."
- braindead Hollywood retards apparently -
Honestly would have revived traditional animation had Disney tried at all to secure the rights for it. Universal might not be the right studio for this movie.
Warner Bros. claimed that they would be making animated films of Septeimus Heap once Harry Potter ended. Now, thirteen years later, not a single Septeimus Heap film has been released.
@@matthewcole4753 Disneyfilm isn't interested in traditional methods, even when they boasted that their CG movie Wish was "traditional". Give it to Sylvain Chomet or Ari Folman if you want traditional.
“Fast and furious is running out of steam” You mean it’s not out of steam already?
That shit ain't even running on fumes anymore... For a LONG TIME.
Haha right it isn't running out of steam....it already RAN out lol
I'm surprised it's not running on solar panels and an EV battery.
If was revamped as steampunk, I'd actually watch it.
just waiting for fast XVI where they are zooming around on mobility scooters
#5. Whoa, whoa, whoa. What, what, what?
Didn't we learn from trivia pages just like this one that Leslie Nielsen was a serious dramatist throughout his prime? Bet Liam was chosen for the same reason!
Leslie Nielson was picked for AIRPLANE due to being a serious dramatist, just as many other serious actors were picked for that film.
Police Squad was released in 83, The Naked Gun in 88 - He'd already proven his comedic chops when he got the role of Frank Drebbin!
He was also significantly YOUNGER than Liam Neeson who is 71, Nielson was only 67 when he made Naked Gun 3 in 94!
Neeson was picked because he's a big name - If they were going to even attempt this they'd have been far better off with David Duchovny, Colin Firth or Antonio Banderas who are all 63 and have all shown talent for comedy!
He's funny in the movie Gun Shy, @@franohmsford7548
Granted the tone of its humor is much more subdued, though.
Leslienielsen is funny even in non comedic movie.
I love how a Garfield trailer played as an ad before this
That was funny
You get ads?
@@Clownboy15 yeh I did.
@@GibsonHReviews I forgot those were a thing on UA-cam. I use the app a lot listening to podcasts and music, so I pay for premium so I can play it with the screen off or switch between apps and still have it playing in the background. The one feature I liked the best was playing it with my screen turned off. Saves on battery life. It’s been totally worth it for me!
you get ads? that sucks
Alternative title for this list: "scrapings from the bottom of the IP barrel"
Or "what fan-base hasn't been milked lately?"
that was like 5 years ago, they really have to scrape to get anything good. Specially with multiple daily videos, so are you surprised? if so, why are you still here? they are pandering to the lowest common denomination and here you are....so you make them think you like it by watching it...
The Garfield movie is the only one that shouldn’t be here. You highly underestimate how many children, parents, and nostalgic adults are going to show up for this
Yep I'd say Garfield will be fine. Hey, maybe Pizza Goldfish is the perfect snack for eating while watching it.
This channel does get it wrong sometimes. They thought Puss n Boots: The Last Wish would bomb because of the poor receptions to Shrek 3 and 4 and the fact that The first Puss in Boots movie is not held in as high esteem as the first Shrek or How to Tame Your Dragon or Kung Fu Panda. Yet The Last Wish was one of the biggest surprises ever in how great it was.
@@jimmyboy7817 To be fair, I don't think anyone could predict how well The Last Wish would turn out to be. The trailers didn't excite most people and it was a years-late sequel to a spin-off to a franchise than ran out of steam years ago. It had everything going against it but somehow managed to capture lightning in a bottle.
This aged like milk...
It had a comparatively small budget. The studio has already sold it to Netflix …so it’s already broken even ( as I type this on Monday evening)
In the "Musical Genre"'s defense, "Being a musical" isn't the sole reason the Disney Live-Action Remakes are failing. Although, replacing the iconic "Be Prepared!" with a longer version of "Hakuna Matata" didn't help its case.
Let's just be open. Remakes/reboots/live-action remakes and decades-later sequels are failing. I know writers cost money, but originality will help things.
The reason they are failing is because disney is refusing to try any thing original
@@metheus108
Remakes have been a hallmark of Hollywood for nearly a hundred years. The Maltese Falcon was a remake of a lesser known 1931 film, and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde had A DIZEN ADAPTIONS BY 1941.
The problem now is that generally bad writing. Coupled with wokism, have left Hollywood creatively, and soon to be financially bankrupt.
Turning one of their most iconic villain songs into a half-length spoken word poem that was half over before you even realise that it had started was a terrible idea. They obviously shoe-horned it in after the negative backlash to their announcement that they wouldn't have it in the film, but they couldn't even do that right.
It's not super hero fatigue, it's bad movie fatigue.
Also woke fatigue!
Invincible and The Boys would agree.
I've moved from Superhero movies to Anime because unlike movies Anime is not crap.
Leslie Nelson was also seen as a serious actor and not a comedian before doing Airplane so I say we give Neason a chance before saying the movie is doom and I thought he was funny in Ted
I believe it's the same with Lloyd Bridges. Also Neilson was 58 when he switched over to comedy so yeah your right give him a fucking chance lol
Not only that, he has been in 2 comedies and his dry humor is perfect for that parst!
eh no thanks, not for me. I didn't like Airplane and the last 100 spoof movies that came out recently bombed, we just don't care about spoof movies. That's the type of stuff we see at school plays. If I want to see a lame movie, I will do that. But if I want something great right away, I will chose not to see something that looks so very disappointing
you do you, some people like garbage. Some people don't notice it's garbage until others peel off that golden candy wrapper to show a melted moldy chocolate egg under neath the gold.
Garfield creator Jim Davis was a frustrated artist who cynically created Garfield in order to be marketable. It was never really meant to be funny, it was meant to be cute so people would buy stuff with Garfield on it. That’s why there’s endless film adaptations, toys, merchandise etc. no hate intended, make your money, dude
"Garfield" has done pretty well. It was ho-hum during its early years, but then it became VERY funny during the mid-'80s, when the tone shifted from satirical to cartoon zany. In the mid-'90s, however, Davis seemed to stop caring about it much, and the stories became not only boring but practically nonexistent. The strip still gets a chortle out of me now and then, but for the most part it's even less interesting than "Dilbert" - and that is saying something. An entire generation of kids has now grown up not thinking Garfield is a cool character. As with "The Simpsons," it's time to just let "Garfield" end.
@@SeasideDetective2 Garfield was my favorite growing up in the 90’s - I loved the tv adaptation, especially the Christmas special on the arbuckle farm. I just think the marketing ploy makes the endless adaptations make more sense
I had wondered as a youngster how much effect that had on Bill Watterson's legendary refusal to license C&H for anything at all.
Mind you, that was pre-internet times, so all I could do was ask myself... but I didn't know anyway.
I always wanted a stuffed Hobbes. This older version of me is glad to have never had one.
Ridiculously stupid. Garfield started in 1976. Nobody back then was thinking about merchandising.
Yeah I felt like the reasons given here for whyt he Garfield film would bomb make no sense. A real reason would be less of actual Garfield in the film than one would like. But this is kind of like Mickey Mouse, it doesnt have to be true to the comic strip to sell.
The Crow ad gives me Morbius vibes.
It’s Crowin’ time!
I just saw the mini clip at the beginning of this video, and from that I thought there was a competing version of the Joker set to come out.
At least I wasn't right... but that's about the same as being happy your sandwich doesn't have two pounds of live maggots in it.
@@majorgear1021 And then he crow'd all over the place!
‘Handled with care and finesse’ while showing the Rock in a deer onesie shooting guns. Nice touch
honestly, Id rather take the Rocks gritty take than what they will inevitably release.
That Bambi SNL skit was one of the few things The Rock acted well in...
My first memory of Liam Neeson was in a comedy movie called High Spirits. I thought him doing action movies was him trying to get away from comedy.
my first experience with Neeson was Next of Kin as Patrick Swayze's Kentucky Cousin (Brother?) and then Darkman.. (although I didn't know it at the time
-- I didn't know him by Name until Schindler's List and recognized him in Hindsight
even then 'Taken' and his Direct to Video work felt like an active attempt to distance himself from the 'Awards Bait' Drama that he seemed to do for much of the 90s
.
@@TJ52359 Darkman was the shit, hands down. It's too bad Neeson wasn't in the sequels, but I can't give Arnold Vosloo any hate because at least we got more Darkman out of it.
Huh, shades of Alec Guinness. Also had his start in comedy - I can recommend "Lavender Hill Mob".
Krull. 😎
@whiskeyvictor5703 You know, it was on TV all the time when I was a kid, but I forgot he was even in Krull.
Leslie Nielsen played his roll 100% straight, if Neeson place it straight, a fish out of water, and not for comedy, it could be amazing.
Frank was a “hard boiled” police detective Neeson can do that
@@carltontaylor6500 my point exactly, it’s not a comedic roll, it’s a straight roll surrounded by crazy
"Let's make a Naked gun reboot with the original actor, what was his name again?
L. Neeson?"
"L. Nielsen!"
"sounds close enough. Let's do it! "
I see the logic
Oh, actor name alliteration is TIGHT.
@@commandercaptain4664 Did you mean L Nielsen? Oh, whoops! Whoopsie!
Garfield might actually be good, I mean Super Mario Bros was. As long as the movie is entertaining then it doesn't matter Chris Pratt is voicing the main character.
I feel sorry for "The Crow". It has so much potential but it's never going to fulfill it. It really should be a different Crow every Halloween night. The Devil offers a return to life with power to take revenge to an innocent, wronged, soul every Halloween. It's his little gift to himself.
I haven't read the comics so I could be WAY off base, but I didn't think it was anything to do with The Devil?
@@DavidGowers He returns to the world of the living on Halloween night with super powers? The "Devil" isn't named specifically but the supernatural is obviously referenced even if that reference remains intentionally vague.
@@jeptoungrit9000 'the supernatural' isn't the sole domain of Satan/Lucifer/The Devil, though.
- How many times are you going to put The Crow on the same type of lists?
- Yes.
well the trailer looks like the gay joker let him have his fun
Liam Neesan MIGHT be able to pull it off. He once did a skit where the character he played in Taken was auditioning to be a mall Santa. It was hysterical.
I'll never go to another Star Wars film. I've learned my lesson.
The first trilogy was so great that a zillion crappy movies have made money.
No hate. Just don’t care.
Didn't they also predict that the BeeKeeper was going to be a flop, and it totally was not.
it didn't do good, I have no idea what movie that even is. But compared to their budget, they made 152m which really isn't great. So it to me is a flop. You can make money and still be a flop. Not a single person around me has even mentioned it, it sounds bad. I will never watch it.
But this is their opinion, if you disagree why are you here...do you need to be told what to do and what to think?
@@ravinraven6913 "You can make money and still be a flop." -- said someone who is ostensibly AI.
@@ravinraven6913you have zero insight you dweeb. Beekeeper was a hit.
@@commandercaptain4664 making. Only doesn’t mean you make a profit. The Marvels ‘made money’ ($206 million). Unfortunately. That was against a production budget of $278 million, and over $100 million in marketing. Then subtract the distribution and theater cut. So in the final analysis, The Marvels ‘made money’ year still lost upwards of $300 million for Disney Corp.
@@commandercaptain4664 Well if The Producers taught us anything it's that the entertainment industry can make money off of a flop. Just don't ask to see the receipts.
I've got no problem with musicals but turning Joker 2 into a musical after the story and tone of the first is a wild choice. But hey you never know, it could end up being a 10/10
It's not a musical, this has been corrected by the director as a quote taken out of context.. but you know.. got to make a list somehow.
I feel it's either going to be great, or end up in the realm of "so bad it's good".
I haven't been keeping up with the Joker 2 news, but what if the musical aspects are some kind of fever-dream sequence? That could work really well.
It could be the next Dancer in the Dark, which was phenomenal and sinister as fffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
I know it won't be a 10 out 10. It's got Lady Gaga in it. That's worse idea than putting Anya Taylor-Joy in a MadMax movie.
I just feel bad for Garfield having to go through this 😢 make crappy movies if you want to, but leave Garfield out of it.
To paraphrase Jurassic Park:
"They were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
best quote so far
Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F should have gotten a theatrical release, not Netflix. And Fast X shouldn’t have ended on a cliffhanger. If they were to end it on a cliffhanger, then Fast X should have been filmed back-to-back with the previous one. As for Venom, I honestly didn’t mind the first two. I just hope they go out with a bang and not a whimper.
is it a copyright issue that they can't put spider man with venom ?
@@rodscarbrough2337 I don’t know.
They put these cheesy movies on Netflix to save the 'Stars' from the embarassment of the box office results being public. Did you watch "You People"? It was awful. Or Atlas or The Mother with JLo?
@@daveclark8337 I actually enjoyed The Mother and Atlas. In fact, Atlas reminded me of super robot and mecha anime...
The Garfield argument made in this video is pretty funny considering how many adaptations that gave zero effs about the source material have been done in recent years.
I would argue that GArfield is the tye of character that a movie featuring him will not suffer at the box office due to departure from canon. It might still struggle, I dunno, but not for that reason.
@@kipolem53 I feel like what is being forgotten is that Garfield has had 2 cartoons since the 1980's and many TV specials. The first cartoon that aired from the late 1980's to mid 1990's, did deviate from the comic strip but also simultaneously took the beloved overweight feline on many crazy and outlandish adventures. I believe the second cartoon from the 2000's also did that as well. So I think a lot of parents, who were children during the time when the Garfield and Friends cartoon was in syndication, are going to take their kids to watch this movie simply because they remember the cartoon very fondly. The movie may not do gangbusters but it will likely be in it for the long haul and will stick around in theaters for at least half of the summer before it hits streaming platforms. So I see the movie at least breaking even before it leaves theaters and then make up the rest of money in DVD and streaming sales.
I actually think Liam Neeson is perfect for a Naked Gun reboot. He basically just has to act exactly like he does in his action films while saying purposly ridiculous dialog.
Isn't that what Leslie Nielson basically did?
I learned that way before with the Naked gun films and other comedy films, he take serious or villain roles. I was surprised that he one of the many actors can work really well to play opposites by character or tone, just like how many once believed Micheal Keaton won’t be taken seriously as Batman.
The writing is gonna be what makes or breaks the Naked Gun reboot. Liam Neeson is quite capable of being funny but if the writers give him bs, it won't be good.
I read somewhere that Leslie nielson was almost completely humorless and didn't get any of the jokes.
he was a perfect straightman because he thought the whole thing was stupid and unfunny and simply did as instructed...then was genuinely surprised by the success
Leslie Nielsen - Liam Neeson... Oddly similar names.
They probably thought "eh, close enough."
Hold on, "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey" made $5.2 *million* on a budget of $50k... Not exactly a "failure" no matter how much you dislike the film. So I can absolutely see why the studio would go and make a bunch more, no matter how terrible the movie is...
The Crow remake also has a mediocre director
Disney need to from a song from one of their movies "Frozen" - Let it go.
Why does it sound like every. Single. Line. Of this video sound like it was recorded separately? Sounds like fucking AI...!
Frankly, kudos to the creators of the Garfield movie for finding literally Anything that wasn't already part of canon after 40 years of writing. It's a terrible idea, but it's kind of impressive that they were able to make that mistake.
Don't. They might take it as a challenge. Who knows, now they might want to explore what happens if Jim and Liz get into a raging custody battle... over a cat..
@@stevekirkpatrick1612 one gets Garfield and one gets Ody 😂
Garfield: Totally missing the fact that kids don’t care about the source material. And kid tickets cost just as much as adult tickets.
Wicked: Wide appeal? No. Theater freaks seeing it 4 times in a week? Yes.
Venom: Typical 3rd film drop, but not Morbius level drop.
Who cares about kids not caring. They aren't the ones buying the ticket. The real problem is that these decisions are being made by people who were more out of touch than I currently am when I was still a kid.
2 weeks later Garfield movie has been a hit.
Borderlands has all the signs of a failed movie, even just ignoring the concept, the character deviations, and casting choices.
Like the fact that theyve had a set date for this movie for over a year now and we have seen so little promotion from it. Its here in a couple months and there's only been 1 trailer. And while Im all for less is more, since most trailers tend to spoil the whole movie. Gearbox hosts their own showcases dedicated to their IP and they never bring this movie up. They only did it like once 2-3 yrs ago in a pseudo behind the scenes walkaround.
Probably because some people weren't ok with what has been shown in the trailer, i'd guess...
They made a 2D animated Garfield show that I watched as a kid that actually held up well to the source material. We have it on DVD because my brother still likes to watch it every now and again.
Hell yeah, with Lorenzo Music as Garfield!
loved it too every Saturday morning Garfield and friends
I’m reserving judgment on “Garfield”. 🤔
Wicked has been made into a two-parter because it includes many story elements in the original novel that were not included in the play. It's trying to be "truer to the text", so to speak.
I do see your point, but given how much I loved the play, I plan to give Wicked a chance at least.
I am a huge huge Wicked fan there are so many plot point differences from the book (much darker) and the musical is family friendly
Not that I disagree, but oddly the Garfield movie made $91M globally. Not sure it's doomed.
Some of my co-worker's and I had a conversation a while back about The Crow reboot and we all agreed that it shouldn't be made concidering what happened to Brandon Lee on the set of the first movie (he got shot with a gun that was supposed to be full of blanks). R.I.P.
Rest in Peace to Brandon but his death is not a reason for creators to not take a stab at The Crow again. It was a comic before it was a movie and if someone wants to adapt it they should be able to.
It was full of blanks. The metal that was in the barrel (for safety) broke loose and killed him. I remember that night watching the news and them reporting he'd been shot only to report 15 mins later he was dead.
_The Crow_ had multiple sequels and a TV series, all of which rode the success of the Brandon Lee film. No idea why this one entry is suddenly crossing a line.
Venom: The Last Dance is safe. it's Kraven the Hunter you should really be worried about. Venom is at least dumb fun, Kraven is just another Morbius
Sure, The Last Dance is as safe as Transformers: The Last Knight
I mean any venom movie is a masterpiwce compared to the las knight. Far more entertaining than the last trash. @RayMcElroy50
@@raf686 And far dumber too
@RayMcElroy50 not even close. But you continue to love the last knight more which I still don't know what made you bring up the last knight either.
@@raf686 I brought TLK because of Transformers
Despite being an awful franchise, it made a fortune, so by the producers followed the same logic and believed that TLK was a safe bet, just because it was Transformers.
But instead of being just another hit at the box-office, it became the lowest-grossing movie of Bay's saga
The "Twisted ChiIdhood Universe" is literally what I filmed as an edgy high schooler.
The original "Crow" WAS, goth John Wick.
Ok, let’s get order correct Wicked the musical is based on the 1st book in a series by Gregory Maguire. The 4 books are Wicked, Son of A Witch, A Lion Among Men, and Out of OZ. Now there were some interesting changes that the musical made to the source material. Honestly the book was phenomenal and I would prefer a more faithful adaptation.
I tried to read that book. I felt it was way too serious and dreary. I guess I was spoiled by having heard the musical first and was expecting something like that. I got about two thirds of the way through before I just trashed it.
Given how far the musical veers from the book, and the fact that the book doesn't align at all with the Wizard of Oz timeline, mixing these will cause a tonal and narrative mess. I was hoping a film adaption would fix the pacing of the second act but any conceivable fix would not support an entire film. I think production is worried though. Marc Platt's last two musicals (Dear Evan Hanson and CATS) were disasters, precisely because they didn't address the known issues and instead went for neopotism and spectacle. They've announced a behind-the-scenes TV special that airs before the movie releases. Seems kind of desperate after all the promo they've done. In hindsight they probably shouldn't have cast two leads known for breaking up marriages in a story focusing on selfless acts for friendship. I was so excited when they announced but since the cheating scandal, there's no way I'm going to pay to see Ethan Slater smirk for 2 hours in two different sittings.
Please, refrain from including in this list movies that haven't started filming. Until then, they will only sound like a bad idea, hopefully.
I actually want to go see Garfield lol
Me too
I still have hope for The Naked Gun reboot. I think with enough effort from the director and Liam Neeson, this can be a good film or reboot.
This doesn't age well for Garfield. lol
Garfield did surprisingly well at the box office. Its predicted box office was on the low side but it also had a modest production and advertising budget when compared to many other films mentioned on this list.
It’s definitely turned a profit for the studio so look forward to Garfield 2 😅
I was highly skeptical of any of these movies being doomed, but then you mentioned Venom and I immediately knew that you had no idea what you were talking about.
I mean….you guys included Free Guy, Super Mario Bros and The Beekeeper on previous iterations of these lists back in the day, and we all saw how they turned out at the box office. 🤷🏻♂️
Your track record isn’t the best either these lists.
they all sucked, all those movies blows. You guys will pay money to watch some one eat garbage. Society really has been dumbed down haven't they.
Really hope Garfield is a sleeper hit. Grew up with my mom reading me the comics on Sundays
I grew up with Garfield comics. But as an adult, garfield is worse than Mondays. Definitely should be only for children, not man children. It's like people forgot that when they grow up, they are supposed to stop watching children stuff and actually grow up. Maybe it's because their parents haven't been around to let them know they are acting like a child, lord knows strangers saying it sounds more as an insult, even if it is not.
But then here I am watching Dragonball anime. So I definitely didn't fully grow up despite being in my 30s, but that doesn't stop me from seeing the truth, which makes us a bit insane to be polite about it.
@@ravinraven6913imagine being so miserable that you believe that only children can enjoy classics, or cartoons. There is no age limit on enjoying anything, especially something that brought us joy as children. Get back in touch with your inner child, while you watch your dragon ball z. It’ll do you a world of good so that you don’t have to write strangers and try to talk down to them for enjoying something.
I hope that Garfield outperforms Wicked because screw that overrated SJW CGI fest.
I don't see why Garfield is on a list like this. IF would make more sense. If people can tolerate Seth McFarlane ninja turtles, then then can watch this.
Venom and the sequel made money because they were both enjoyable movies to watch. I watched the both I enjoyed them
bambi:the reckoning? they should have made the SNL version of bambi.
The Crow WAS Brandon Lee, and always will be. Out of respect for him, there should never be any remake.
Breaking Wicked into two parts could be okay... If they treat it like the break between the two acts of the musical. And the extra run time might leave room for stuff from the book that the musical left out. So, I'm reserving my judgment.
This list as aged really bad (the video came out last night😆).
Garfield came out on 1/4 of the european markets and already made almost all its budget back (40 millions) and it's getting great reviews from critics. This will easily be a success😅
I think Beverly Hills Cop-Axel F, looks good.
"Venom: The Last Dance" has the writer from "50 Shades of Grey"
In her DIRECTORIAL DEBUT
Look, just wait until the movie comes out. Like the beginning of the video said it’s not fair to judge films before release
@@daniellewis4154 True. You can't judge a book by its cover. But you can judge by the people that made it.
@@daniellewis4154 life isn't fair. Why should a book/film be any different!
@@daniellewis4154 Rather ironic considering the title to the video.
ok so what, porn writers have been lead writer in many movies and no one thinks it will suck because of it.
disagree with you on Wicked - it's gonna be a huge hit.
and the musical has an act1 & act11 with a break between. The film is following that
Actually I have always been fascinated by the different incarnations of the Wizard of Oz story line. And over the years there have been many. Tin Man, The Wiz, Return to Oz, Oz the Great and Powerful...just to name a few. Was surprised to hear that Wicked will be a 2 parter, but still I am looking forward to seeing this. Had never seen the stage play, as this will be a complete unknown for me and yes, I will see both parts.
I would see Wicked for the world building aspect. Saw the play numerous times due to my job at the time in event staffing. I loved the play.
You put too much faith in people, most of these will be alright, because social media pressure and FOMO( Even for trash) is real
Bambi looks good,from what I saw.
To be fair Garfield source material barely exists. It's just like same comic, over, and over
Huh, I didn't even know that Coming 2 America had been a thing...
*"Ted"* is more Garfield than Garfield.
Nah, that's a ridiculous statement. Ted is more like Paddington plus the Ted movies are overrated imo.
@@ihavethecorrectopinion8754i agree. I like Seth McFarlane but his live-action movies are never really any good imo
@@HelloMyNameIsRED Yes Seth has a bad track record with live action movies. I never cared for Ted and I would much rather just Family Guy.
The only way I can see Wicked possibly working is if they add in a lot of scenes originally from the books. (Tho not sure if political goat murder could save this? Maybe?)
Did you have a cup of coffee between each sentence? 😂
Garfield will be fine I think. It might be more based off of the cartoons from the 1980s/90's and that other one from the 2000's. I'm saying this because those cartoons had a lot more creative liberties than what the comic strips had. The comic strips were more of a lifestyle based on regular everyday life whereas the cartoons often took Garfield on some crazy but memorable adventures.
The only ones that I agree with is number 10(Horror Bambi) and number 1(you do a Crow movie with another character than Eric Draven). The rest of this list is just wishful thinking on this channel's behalf.
I haven’t seen Wicked, so maybe I’m missing something, but it seems entirely reasonable to me that a 150 minute play would (and arguably should) be made into two movies.
1: A two and a half hour movie is too long for many audiences
2: Films tend to focus more on drawn out scenes to fully display an actor’s emotion vs telling you via song
3: The settings are so much more interesting to look at in film than on stage that it would be straight-up weird if there weren’t plenty of scenes without dialogue that just displayed the majesty of OZ, which would at to the running time
Having seen the theatre production of Wicked in London, I can tell you that a single movie would work just fine; after all, there are many other films that have long shots of the setting with little to no dialogue (LOTR), have been 2.5 hours long (again, LOTR), and have used a mixture of dialogue and songs to tell the story (Les Miserables). I'm actually excited to see the film when it releases in the cinema, and I'd like it to do well personally - given the success of Les Miserables (which is also a film adaptation of a play), they should be able to do it justice.
It's going to be hilarious when over HALF of these become amazingly huge box office record smashing hits and then WhatCulture won't update this, or say a damn thing.
1:55 Tf you mean REASONABLY entertaining? Garfield is fking comedy GOLD!!
It’s not superhero fatigue… it’s BAD SUPERHERO MOVIE fatigue. Maybe give us something where the bad guy has different powers from the hero.
Oh no, it IS different! See, the bad guy has immediate mastery over the skill, but the good guy had to go through some sort of training montages. Totally different.
yeas thats why we love the batman. we want good fking movies not this mcu trash
@@blacky8987 the batman is a bad superhero movie.
But Gaia has the powers of all MCU characters.
Capeshit was always overrated anyway.
You are going to be so wrong about Garfield bombing. It caters to kids and families, and in a style that is easy on the eyes and a great cast. This is the worst take you've probably ever had.
Right? It's SO not my bag, but I can see it doing massive business among parents with young kids. I won't go see it but there'll be a LOT of people who will, and I hope it does well. Even if just to piss off haters
We really are in a cultural dark age.
It is an insult and blasphemy do remake The Crow.
Meh. I'll still watch what I want to watch.
AVI ARAD has ruined so far...
* Daredevil (2003)
* The Punisher (2004)
* Elektra (2005)
* Fantastic Four (2005)
* X-Men: The Last Stand
* Spider-Man 3
* Bratz (2007)
* Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
* The Amazing Spider-Man 2
* Ghost in the Shell (2017)
* Venom: Let There Be Carnage
* Uncharted (2022)
* Morbius
And now he's gonna ruin...
* Borderlands
* Kraven the Hunter
* Venom: The Last Dance
* The Legend of Zelda movie
* Naruto
As long Arad lives, there's no hope
Legend of Zelda? I don't think Nintendo will let something bad happen to their movie.
Why do you think his presence makes movies bad? What did he do to each of those movies that made you hate them?
@@daniellewis4154Nothing. That's what he does.
He half-asses everything he works on. His first priority is how to use it to sell toys. The story and script are the last priorities.
Bratz? You can't ruin that. That was NEVER gonna be good. Borderlands looks hilarious, tho. "OMG KEVIN HART IS TOO SHORT" and Hugh Jackman is too tall. Don't care.
I already paid for these movies with my stolen taxes via ESG. I'm not going to pay them twice.
Unless Wicked is going to include more of the plot from the book, then two parts really is unnecessary.
Wicked can't fail hard or fast enough to suit me.
Imagine being so selfish you want the work of literal HUNDREDS of people to fail just to soothe your own chafed arse.
@@DavidGowers Imagine caring what someone else thinks...
@@cowetascore8476 couldn't be you, could it?
Why? After all, it isn't as if anyone will force you to watch it.
I strongly disagree with you guys about “Wicked”!! I think it looks amazing and having it divided into two parts is actually quite smart. There’s so much in the book that’s not in the musical that I’m hoping that they will include in this movie. And I think your wrong, I think this movie will be extremely “popular” *wink wink*
i think the joker film has the potential to be absolutely unique and ground breaking. R rated musical with A list actors and talented director….
“Liam Neeson isn’t the first name you think of when you hear the words ‘wacky comedy.’”
Sort of like Leslie Nielsen before _Airplane!_