Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains Big Numbers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
  • 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. That’s the estimated number of stars in the universe. That’s a pretty big number. But, how did we get here? And, can we go bigger? You bet we can go bigger. In this video, Neil deGrasse Tyson and comic co-host Chuck Nice are here to help you understand how big some numbers truly are.
    We have to start small. Neil takes us from a simple million to a billion and then way beyond anything you’re imagining. You’ll learn how many stars are in our galaxy. And, how many galaxies are in our universe. What does the number really mean in the scale of everything?
    How long would it take you to count to a billion? How long would it take you to count to a trillion? Then, we cross the point where numbers get so big that you have to start using words to describe them. Discover more about a mole, a googol, a googolplex, and Skewes’ number. After this video, you’ll look at numbers a whole different way!
    Support us on Patreon: / startalkradio
    Subscribe to StarTalk: ua-cam.com/users/startalk...
    About the prints that flank Neil in this video:
    "Black Swan” & "White Swan" limited edition serigraph prints by Coast Salish artist Jane Kwatleematt Marston. For more information about this artist and her work, visit Inuit Gallery of Vancouver, inuit.com/
    Follow StarTalk:
    Twitter: / startalkradio
    Facebook: / startalk
    Instagram: / startalkradio
    About StarTalk:
    Science meets pop culture on StarTalk! Astrophysicist & Hayden Planetarium director Neil deGrasse Tyson, his comic co-hosts, guest celebrities & scientists discuss astronomy, physics, and everything else about life in the universe. Keep Looking Up!
    #StarTalk #neildegrassetyson
    0:00 - Introduction
    0:46 - Exponential Notation
    2:01 - Billions
    2:41 - How Much Money Does Jeff Bezos Have?
    4:16 - How Many Hamburgers Has McDonald’s Sold?
    4:33 - Trillions
    5:10 - A Billion Seconds in Years
    5:41 - How Long Does It Take To Count To A Trillion?
    6:30 - Quadrillions
    7:36 - Quintillions
    8:50 - Sextillions
    9:48 - Moles
    12:41 - The Sum of All Particles
    13:05 - Googol
    14:09 - Googolplex
    16:35 - Skewes’ Number
    17:55 - Closing
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,9 тис.

  • @daddoesthings9461
    @daddoesthings9461 3 роки тому +818

    I love how Neil genuinely goes back and forth from hysterical to dead serious explaining something in a matter of seconds

    • @joshuageorge7997
      @joshuageorge7997 2 роки тому +22

      Easily among the best scientific illustrators to exist

    • @BlakeGibbons
      @BlakeGibbons 2 роки тому +19

      It's called fake laughing so the other person will just shut up and let you finish your point.

    • @irenaveksler1935
      @irenaveksler1935 2 роки тому +4

      @@BlakeGibbons okay?

    • @SqaurebearSqaurebear
      @SqaurebearSqaurebear Рік тому +2

      @@joshuageorge7997 Amongsus

    • @mgrootemaat
      @mgrootemaat Рік тому

      Likewise I hate how the other guy is or pretends to be as smart as a 6 year old.

  • @365er
    @365er 4 роки тому +2047

    you guys have the best dynamic of knowledge and comedy in your shows. great content

    • @reallymysterious4393
      @reallymysterious4393 4 роки тому +39

      Only to be rivaled by a press conference featuring Fauci and Trump ...

    • @polat__
      @polat__ 4 роки тому +9

      Indeed, simple, funny and educational by high-degree astrophysicist

    • @unnamedchannel1237
      @unnamedchannel1237 4 роки тому +1

      What about buzz liteyear?

    • @matt4787
      @matt4787 4 роки тому +14

      I must have missed the comedy.

    • @MonsieurDrobot
      @MonsieurDrobot 4 роки тому +2

      It’s sci fi babble at it’s finest. Neil gets paid a dollar for ever idiot that still believes humans exist in the opposite direction below them on “the other side of the world.”🙃😹🥂 Needless to say, there’s a ton of sci fi programmed retards that still think they exist on the exterior of an infinitely ballerina twirling lava filled dirt ball that gracefully moves with nearly ZERO turbulence as it whizzes around the sun in the air we are all breathing.😹😹😹🌍🤾🏻‍♂️🗑

  • @theinterruptedlife1783
    @theinterruptedlife1783 Рік тому +55

    If you cant express it simply, you have not learnt it yet. How beautifully Mr.Tyson potrays this.

    • @larrycurrycarpediem
      @larrycurrycarpediem 11 місяців тому +4

      That's one to grow on. I tip my hat to you sir!!!!

    • @ianmikael3019
      @ianmikael3019 9 місяців тому +2

      well said!

    • @theinterruptedlife1783
      @theinterruptedlife1783 9 місяців тому

      @@ianmikael3019 it has helped me in my work life. I am a hardware engineer and technical stuff is really important. I keep digging unless I understand it simply
      Luckily I also have a mentee and therefore I have someone to explain things to

  • @sreenathc
    @sreenathc 2 роки тому +105

    Neil is one seriously brilliant educator….his explanation with analogies, and giving Aha moments is just amazing!

  • @Varrik159
    @Varrik159 4 роки тому +405

    "You don't know inconceivable yet"
    It was such a throwaway comment but I love it XD

    • @carealoo744
      @carealoo744 3 роки тому +2

      I happened to skip ahead through the video, and landed right where he said that :)

    • @NathanY0ung
      @NathanY0ung 3 роки тому +4

      Can I drink you?

    • @Varrik159
      @Varrik159 3 роки тому +5

      @@NathanY0ung Yes. Yes you can.

    • @Robo-xk4jm
      @Robo-xk4jm 3 роки тому +2

      Especially since they were only at quadrillion

    • @Puppy_Puppington
      @Puppy_Puppington 3 роки тому

      In my peripheral vision, ur profile picture looked like that little ninja people have... it’s so Trippy looking at it directly and realizing it’s not.

  • @thelants8569
    @thelants8569 4 роки тому +341

    6 year old me: Dad, what's the biggest number?
    My Dad: It's a big number.

    • @imadetheuniverse4fun
      @imadetheuniverse4fun 4 роки тому +12

      He wasn't wrong.

    • @nebtheweb8885
      @nebtheweb8885 4 роки тому +3

      Reminds me of the Cosmos segment where Carl Sagan explains a GooGOL Plex. ua-cam.com/video/0lFQOmb6mVs/v-deo.html

    • @animationspace8550
      @animationspace8550 4 роки тому +2

      My dad said it's a trillion, and I wondered what happened to a trillion and one.

    • @JoeMarine
      @JoeMarine 4 роки тому +1

      1 with as many zeros...lol

    • @Speed001
      @Speed001 4 роки тому +2

      The biggest number is the biggest number.

  • @StaticBlaster
    @StaticBlaster Рік тому +10

    You should do a part 2 to this and talk about Graham's number, Tree(3), and countable/uncountable ordinals, Rayo's number, and absolute infinity. And the Hilbert Hotel paradox.

  • @burnout_2017
    @burnout_2017 Рік тому +7

    These videos are so fun and interesting and educational all at the same time. Please keep them coming

  • @bitcores
    @bitcores 4 роки тому +397

    "There are air molecules that were breathed by Genghis Khan"
    That's not the only thing I have from Genghis Khan.

    • @evo2542
      @evo2542 4 роки тому +24

      uh.... his genes?

    • @frocat5163
      @frocat5163 4 роки тому +58

      Giggity. Or would it be Genghiggity?

    • @Purrfect_Werecat
      @Purrfect_Werecat 4 роки тому +3

      uwu?

    • @Wikidspidr
      @Wikidspidr 4 роки тому +8

      @@frocat5163 lol, underrated

    • @xxx-js9go
      @xxx-js9go 4 роки тому +7

      @@frocat5163 uh family guy, I see you're a man of culture

  • @gigifox9004
    @gigifox9004 3 роки тому +534

    “A yahoo” 😆 He wins

  • @urieowrjdf
    @urieowrjdf 3 роки тому +5

    You make your shows seems so simple and that it just popped into your head...but you obviously put in a lot of effort into these shows and I would just like to say that I appreciate it very much!

  • @zachc.1923
    @zachc.1923 Рік тому

    This has officially become my favorite thing ever watched on UA-cam in the last 7 years.

  • @ericson0504
    @ericson0504 4 роки тому +504

    I had a headache before I started watching this, now my brain is leaking out of my ear.

    • @timkremer6329
      @timkremer6329 3 роки тому +11

      Leak on me

    • @Turn420
      @Turn420 3 роки тому +3

      Yeah, watching these are not really a cure for headaches

    • @Sejal001
      @Sejal001 3 роки тому +3

      @@timkremer6329 😂

    • @chasemiller7974
      @chasemiller7974 3 роки тому +2

      Well atleast your headache is gone.

    • @benjackson9299
      @benjackson9299 2 роки тому +2

      Search:
      Neil deGrasse Tyson meets Post Malone
      It’s hilarious! 😂 😆

  • @lukeh2379
    @lukeh2379 4 роки тому +116

    It’s cool that he showed the universe is not only incomprehensibly large but also incomprehensibly small.

    • @rravitejamavr6650
      @rravitejamavr6650 4 роки тому +2

      Woow great perspective!

    • @Drinnan
      @Drinnan 4 роки тому +5

      The universe is smaller than it is larger

    • @apolicum
      @apolicum 4 роки тому +5

      @@Drinnan Everything by definition is smaller than it is larger

    • @st.clairbij9208
      @st.clairbij9208 4 роки тому +1

      @@apolicum How do you mean?

    • @jordanlong00
      @jordanlong00 4 роки тому +2

      @@st.clairbij9208 I'm not sure I'm correct, but given that the smallest any given object could be is a single point in the universe, and there is no upper limit for volume given the infinite size of the universe, everything is closer to the smallest that it can be than the largest

  • @andrew1072
    @andrew1072 2 роки тому

    I just love how enthusiastic they are about big numbers. Chucks face when he is told about a Google plex is excellent.

  • @The-binge_710
    @The-binge_710 5 місяців тому +1

    I love your content 😁 great work

  • @Explorer724
    @Explorer724 4 роки тому +188

    chuck.exe has stopped working 15:03

    • @naysayer8772
      @naysayer8772 4 роки тому +4

      Ghost In The Shell 😂

    • @M1w2a3n4s5a
      @M1w2a3n4s5a 4 роки тому +3

      😂😂😂

    • @theduder2617
      @theduder2617 4 роки тому +6

      Core system dump. He should be scanned for errors, then restored to his latest recovery point. I suspect an over-clocking issue based on how long it took to write the dump file and restart.
      lol

    • @jeffreyfahie1502
      @jeffreyfahie1502 4 роки тому

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @youpratter
      @youpratter 4 роки тому

      you must be a millennial :)

  • @RandallStephens397
    @RandallStephens397 4 роки тому +248

    "It's a googolplex. It's a big number."
    - Neil deGrasse Tyson, 2020

    • @TheDisorganizedNerd
      @TheDisorganizedNerd 3 роки тому +3

      It's 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
      Times
      10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 so I'm not typing that but Google might count a googolplex. Granted it would take a lot of time but still

    • @69erthx1138
      @69erthx1138 3 роки тому +1

      I still remember as a kid watching the original Cosmos. and Carl Sagan explaining the googal by rolling out a scroll he carried for a long distance, then blowing your mind further by saying, "now take the one followed by one million zeros and raise it to the power of itself."

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheDisorganizedNerd Not even close

    • @TheDisorganizedNerd
      @TheDisorganizedNerd 3 роки тому

      @@MadScientist267 when i said that i meant im not typing out the extended version of 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
      to the power of 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 thats what i meant by im not typing out a google plex and im not sure if google has the server space for it.

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheDisorganizedNerd I suspected... But had to run with what was there... You used the word "times", indicating simple multiplication, not the exponential equivalent, that's all... So it came up horribly short 🤣

  • @ShinyGroudon
    @ShinyGroudon 2 роки тому +1

    of all the episodes i have watched. this one absolutely blew my mind further open, than the rest.

  • @michaell.8938
    @michaell.8938 Рік тому

    I love this show. I always get introduced to a new way of looking at something.

  • @originalhazelgreene
    @originalhazelgreene 3 роки тому +174

    I love how you make this information understandable by the common person. But not talking down to us in the process. Thank you ❤️

  • @Jay-Kaizo
    @Jay-Kaizo 4 роки тому +445

    I like hearing what Chuck has to say in between Neil's explanations. He's very valuable to this show in my opinion. Love Chuck. :D

  • @bluerain9104
    @bluerain9104 2 роки тому

    I love these explainer videos!

  • @FranciscoJNarez
    @FranciscoJNarez 2 роки тому

    This is the first video I have seen of these two. Probably one of my favorite shows ever now!!

    • @andrewm000
      @andrewm000 Рік тому

      My advice to you is to binge Neil DT.
      Search for the video of "What keeps Neil up at night"

  • @Chartovar
    @Chartovar 4 роки тому +94

    Whomever came with the idea of pairing Neil with Chuck is a genius. Neil’s topics can be, at times, really tough to follow, but having Chuck there to offer a more playful way to approach those topics is what I call “a winning combination”.

    • @rottenpoet6675
      @rottenpoet6675 4 роки тому +4

      you know I tought the opposite...Neil make it funny enough....I dont need a comment hussar for his explanations

    • @donrico8212
      @donrico8212 4 роки тому +3

      I find Chuck corny

    • @vihashah5975
      @vihashah5975 4 роки тому +5

      I like Chuck cuz he’s normal and if he doesn’t understand then probably an average person would not understand as well so I guess it helps Neil for like when he need to simplify more or not..

    • @THEronleon1
      @THEronleon1 4 роки тому +1

      @@donrico8212 I agree. No offense, but I can't get a laugh out of his attempts.

    • @donrico8212
      @donrico8212 4 роки тому +3

      @@THEronleon1 agree. I have never laughed at anything he has said and alot of times I find he takes away from something interesting NDT is saying

  • @M_Alexander
    @M_Alexander 4 роки тому +197

    "The total number of combinations of how you could orient the matter in the universe."
    I got a little unsteady on my feet processing that sentence

    • @nebojsanikolic254
      @nebojsanikolic254 3 роки тому +6

      You too huh 😶

    • @No1_Inpa_Ticular
      @No1_Inpa_Ticular 3 роки тому +6

      And I thought all the combinations of possible winning lottery numbers was big...

    • @phil7218
      @phil7218 3 роки тому +7

      Which means that given enough time the combination of matter that makes up you could happen again and you would exist again!

    • @moeschajackson5326
      @moeschajackson5326 3 роки тому +2

      a. Me too lol😂

    • @M_Alexander
      @M_Alexander 3 роки тому +3

      @@phil7218 there would be uncountable iterations where you exist exactly as you do now but literally everything else is every possible kind of different

  • @psychachu
    @psychachu 3 роки тому +1

    This is one of my favourite ones.

  • @marcelo.n
    @marcelo.n Рік тому +7

    The chemistry between these two is even more amazing than the most complex star in the sky. Great video!

  • @rossdatwelder
    @rossdatwelder 4 роки тому +53

    Neal’s laugh is so wholesome.

  • @rosiesullivan9150
    @rosiesullivan9150 4 роки тому +189

    "Is that called a Yahoo?" - Chuck 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 This was an amazing explanation. Thank you for continuously educating me, Neil! Thanks for the laughs, Chuck!

    • @voidremoved
      @voidremoved 4 роки тому

      No number big enough to measure my yahoo baby. What about YOUR number, sugar?

    • @XtreeM_FaiL
      @XtreeM_FaiL 4 роки тому +1

      Rosie Sullivan I chuckled a bit, but the there is a logic error.
      Number: Googol.
      Company: Google.
      Company: Yahoo.
      Number should be Yahuu or something.

    • @damyr
      @damyr 4 роки тому +1

      @@XtreeM_FaiL No. It's called zillion.

    • @rosiesullivan9150
      @rosiesullivan9150 4 роки тому

      @@XtreeM_FaiL 😂

  • @OtakumaVII
    @OtakumaVII 2 роки тому +1

    this blew my mind. I love Neil deGrasse Tyson's explanation and charisma so much.

  • @spysmile123
    @spysmile123 2 роки тому

    These videos are underrated.. It just blew my mind and my ego destroyed.

  • @2br
    @2br 3 роки тому +272

    its an honor for all coming generations to breath molecules from you Mr.Tyson 🙌

    • @DarkSkay
      @DarkSkay 3 роки тому +18

      And to drink water molecules that went through Marilyn Monroes kidneys ;)

    • @EarlHare
      @EarlHare 3 роки тому

      ...............

    • @shared29
      @shared29 2 роки тому

      @@DarkSkay r/cursedcomments

    • @Competitive_Antagonist
      @Competitive_Antagonist 2 роки тому +1

      There's probabably a serious market for that.

  • @drcraby356
    @drcraby356 4 роки тому +137

    Skewes Number:
    _BIG_
    .
    Graham:
    Im bouta end this mans whole career

    • @Einyen
      @Einyen 4 роки тому +42

      TREE(3): Graham worry about your own career
      Rayo's number: Hello guys!!!

    • @Sparkz147
      @Sparkz147 4 роки тому +14

      einyen1 Did numberphile send you too? 😆

    • @moosemoomintoog230
      @moosemoomintoog230 4 роки тому +8

      ​@@Einyen Rayo's Number for the win. It's so big it's just a concept.

    • @matthewwargo6266
      @matthewwargo6266 4 роки тому +7

      Hey, what’s up my numberphile guys

    • @MajdFreiji
      @MajdFreiji 4 роки тому +1

      The universe will reset itself.

  • @mike814031
    @mike814031 Рік тому +5

    At the end I would have asked Neil is there anything that blows his mind after everything he knows? I'd love to know what he tries to wrap his mind around, because he's got this vast amount of interesting knowledge, I really wish someone would have asked him that. And Incase you're reading this Neil, I've been a big fan of yours for quite a while!

  • @evanhdez
    @evanhdez 3 роки тому +15

    Once I learned about Graham"s Number, Tree(3), and Rayo(10^100) all these numbers seem really small to me. In fact once I learned about Knuth's Up Arrow notation I was blown away by the size that numbers can become.

  • @chrishodgson5430
    @chrishodgson5430 4 роки тому +38

    This blows my mind and somehow I really do understand big numbers better. Neil is like the Led Zeppelin of science.

  • @maxbell9723
    @maxbell9723 4 роки тому +76

    I almost became a math major in the 1st minute of this

  • @TheStarlightKing
    @TheStarlightKing Рік тому +26

    First time hearing about Skewes' number. I was always told that a googolplex is the largest number.

    • @JustLeftLeg
      @JustLeftLeg Рік тому +4

      dude, you can always +1 to any number to get a bigger one, theres no such thing as "the largest" number. Thats why there is a term "infinity"

    • @Krisztian1941
      @Krisztian1941 Рік тому +2

      It's the largest that has its own name, other than "someone's number".

    • @JustLeftLeg
      @JustLeftLeg Рік тому

      @@Krisztian1941 so now we actually talking. By "largest number" you mean the furtherst you can comparably count something and name it. Cuz as I said, there are always a bigger number and also, there are "big" numbers on the other side of the spectrum. Just use not positive but negative powers of 10. But not many people talk about it cuz theres nothing to count with these numbers.

    • @metaltyphoon
      @metaltyphoon Рік тому +5

      Graham's number. Is much larger than Skewes thats is actually applicable to a problem. There is even a notation, the arrow notation, used to write down the last few digits of the number.

    • @donsmith3167
      @donsmith3167 Рік тому

      No, Infinity is the Biggest number, and it's so big that a googolplex is just as far from infinity as the Number 1

  • @Flaeren
    @Flaeren 3 роки тому +4

    10^10^10^56 years: the amount of time you need to wait for the next big bang :) but hey, it's not forever.

  • @trevor3233
    @trevor3233 4 роки тому +135

    When I read the title I thought you were talking about big numbers like 7 or 14

    • @trevor3233
      @trevor3233 3 роки тому +4

      @Sagenth the amount of between when this was posted and you replied is bigger than all the numbers he said in this video

    • @DFord301
      @DFord301 3 роки тому +5

      @@trevor3233 Actually 3 months have passed since u posted this so that's 7,890,000 seconds (googled it 😁) Jeff Bezos still wins

    • @theanglohouse601
      @theanglohouse601 3 роки тому

      LOL!

    • @petergriffin8767
      @petergriffin8767 3 роки тому +1

      @@DFord301 how many 1^-9999999999999 seconds? checkmate loser

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 3 роки тому +1

      @@petergriffin8767 lame

  • @treborironwolfe978
    @treborironwolfe978 4 роки тому +186

    This episode of *StarTalk* was unofficially sponsored by the makers of *Advil*

    • @JimLigon
      @JimLigon 4 роки тому +3

      BAHAHAHAHA! I literally laughed aloud when I read that. Hilarious. Thank you.

    • @PixelPhobiac
      @PixelPhobiac 4 роки тому

      Or any pain killers for that matter 😉

    • @nothisispatrick6832
      @nothisispatrick6832 4 роки тому

      clever very clever

  • @jonalthehost3232
    @jonalthehost3232 Рік тому +17

    If I would of known about Neil when I was a kid, I would of probably have a major in science. Man this guy just makes me want to learn more and ask more questions

    • @bitspacemusic
      @bitspacemusic Рік тому

      Basics first, young Grasshopper: It's *would've, as in would have. Would of doesn't mean anything. Your second part there even becomes weird because of this mix up, "I would've probably have a major in science", instead of "I would probably have a..." It's never too late to pick up the books. Of a nice day!

    • @jonalthehost3232
      @jonalthehost3232 Рік тому +3

      ​@@bitspacemusic When idle time tempts one to correct the grammar of strangers on the internet, you know it's too much. Don't go getting carried away now! Many of us are familiar with the basics of proper writing and yet somehow end up neglecting them in favor of phrases we compose without thought. It's a commonplace occurrence, but hey, it’s the internet, Go Nuts!

    • @bitspacemusic
      @bitspacemusic Рік тому

      @@jonalthehost3232 I love you, if that means anything on the internet.

  • @user-vt4bz2vl6j
    @user-vt4bz2vl6j 3 місяці тому

    Skew's Number : I'm Big.
    Graham's number in the corner : Hold my funny notation.

  • @nekojtamu6065
    @nekojtamu6065 4 роки тому +57

    How lucky must we be to live in this century and be able to grasp new knowledge this easily...

  • @spidaxtreme
    @spidaxtreme 3 роки тому +67

    Friend: How did you know the answer to that problem?
    Me: I just 10^100ed it.

    • @joltster109
      @joltster109 3 роки тому +3

      That's one way to make a mathematician laugh 😆

    • @ariyanmiah54
      @ariyanmiah54 3 роки тому +2

      Me: I just 10^(10^100)ed it

    • @evanhdez
      @evanhdez 3 роки тому

      @@ariyanmiah54 that's a googolplex

  • @davidnemirow5476
    @davidnemirow5476 2 роки тому +1

    Gives new meaning to the googelaphonic speaker system. Great Steve Martin routine. And don’t forget your moon rock needle for the record player

  • @brooklynbarber8946
    @brooklynbarber8946 Рік тому

    This is my favorite Star Talk episode of all time. 👌

  • @hafsasj
    @hafsasj 4 роки тому +75

    Neil has always been the reason why I am interested in science. Though having Chuck there really helps getting things easily !

  • @abdullahemad9457
    @abdullahemad9457 4 роки тому +34

    Glad he didn’t mention grahams number
    Now that would’ve taken an hour to just say how big of a number it is

    • @jpdemer5
      @jpdemer5 2 роки тому +4

      Even if you use a stack of exponents, there aren't enough particles in the universe to write down Graham's number.
      And then there's TREE(3), which makes Graham's number look insignificant.

    • @alexlocke178
      @alexlocke178 2 роки тому +3

      Or Rayo's number.

  • @davidfarrall
    @davidfarrall 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks. That was very revealing. I’ve played around with big numbers and infinite Math in my head. I wonder about the Skews number though. If it means all the combinations of all components of matter being interchangeable, what does that mean in practice? Does it mean We can eventually re-design the entire Universe? And how far are we off achieving that situation? Maybe, in the New Age and New Order, We will be able to generate that condition fairly rapidly? It’s a wonder concept hopefully it should be stable and safe?

  • @SuperiorWare
    @SuperiorWare Рік тому +3

    5:15 When you deal with physics you can calculate so many things you had questions about. Like how many heartbeats gave done so far.vAll this can be calculated

  • @omegagaming7865
    @omegagaming7865 4 роки тому +147

    Much love u 2. Hated Science when I was in school but since then you have opened my mind and ive learnt so much. Inspirational and educational... Can't go wrong

    • @TheExoplanetsChannel
      @TheExoplanetsChannel 4 роки тому

    • @voidremoved
      @voidremoved 4 роки тому

      I am new here can u explain 2 to me?

    • @Mikemfm666
      @Mikemfm666 4 роки тому +1

      Learnt so much? Except how to spell.

    • @Kornelius.1228
      @Kornelius.1228 4 роки тому +1

      voidremoved 2=too or to

    • @JasonWW2000
      @JasonWW2000 4 роки тому +4

      Mike Miller, Not everyone is a native English speaker. Try to be understanding. :)

  • @Brockthedog315
    @Brockthedog315 3 роки тому +80

    My favorite part about about Neil is how easily he is amused. Probably why he has gained so much knowledge.

  • @vids2see4me
    @vids2see4me 3 місяці тому

    Most definitely one of my favorite mind blowing episodes... And you two have many mind blowing episodes.
    Thanks, yet again, for pushing my lazy brain to work harder!

  • @LisaRamseyArt
    @LisaRamseyArt Рік тому +1

    There are so many times in this video that I go to hit the Like button and realize I’ve already hit it.

  • @kepler1175
    @kepler1175 3 роки тому +22

    “and is that called a Yahoo?” Just found this series and I’m deeply in love with the combination of these two

  • @DizzNutt93
    @DizzNutt93 3 роки тому +51

    Absolutely amazing! Neil DeGrasse Tyson said that you should always have your mind blown at least once a day, and it's really wonderful seeing him contribute to that and help others achieve that goal with facts that once blew his very own mind. Truly inspirational!

  • @manny011
    @manny011 Рік тому

    Wonderful video !

  • @PopeLando
    @PopeLando 3 роки тому +2

    Ron Graham : Hold my beer.
    TREE(3) : Hold the combination of things in the Universe raised to Graham's beers.

  • @hatebreeder999
    @hatebreeder999 3 роки тому +4

    Amazing. This was much needed. Do something similar for extremly small numbers too

  • @jakeportolese4031
    @jakeportolese4031 4 роки тому +12

    You can’t find amazing content like this anywhere else! Love it!!

  • @alanhehe4508
    @alanhehe4508 Рік тому

    Fun and informative!!

  • @nijapp
    @nijapp 2 роки тому

    Great explainer guys.

  • @Radiant_OWL
    @Radiant_OWL 3 роки тому +36

    9:44 “But let’s keep goin....I’m not done witchuu”
    Preach Neil...preach.

  • @aliciawiley6479
    @aliciawiley6479 3 роки тому +5

    I will be using this in my Algebra class next year when we talk about exponents. Awesome!

  • @thebeyonder8814
    @thebeyonder8814 2 роки тому +1

    Incredibly well done 👍

  • @ibrahimjaleel5900
    @ibrahimjaleel5900 2 роки тому

    Excellent.
    Speechless.
    Mind boggling.

  • @kapilshenviamonkar4641
    @kapilshenviamonkar4641 3 роки тому +39

    "This is in conceivable."
    Neil deGrasse Tyson: "We're getting there. You haven't seen inconceivable yet." 😍😍

    • @LauraTenora
      @LauraTenora 2 роки тому +1

      America: "one billion"
      Rest of us: "One thousand million" (10 ^ 9)
      America: "one trillion"
      Rest of us: "one billion" (one million million) ( 10 ^ 12)
      America: "one quadrillion"
      Rest of us: "one thousand billion"
      America: " 1 quintillion"
      Rest of us: "1 trillion"
      America: " 1 sextillion"
      Rest of us: " one thousand trillion"
      America: " 1 septillion"
      Rest of us: 1 quadrillion
      America 1 octillion
      Rest of us: one thousand quadrillion
      America: 1 nonillion
      Rest of us: 1 quintillion

  • @I-VisiBomb-I
    @I-VisiBomb-I 4 роки тому +64

    No one:
    me at 4am: its a big number

    • @PafMedic
      @PafMedic 4 роки тому

      I VisiBomb I ,I Just Woke Up,Its 0315😂😂😂😂

    • @dheerajrao2179
      @dheerajrao2179 4 роки тому +1

      4:31 here

    • @PafMedic
      @PafMedic 4 роки тому

      Dheeraj Rao 7:56 PM Now,Sun Is Just Setting,Im Getting My Telescope and Camera Set Up

  • @user-of5lw4oy3c
    @user-of5lw4oy3c 3 місяці тому

    Well done gents. Very informative.

  • @michaelschwartz9485
    @michaelschwartz9485 Рік тому +1

    Chuck Norris can write a googolplex on one sheet of paper.

  • @WordUnheard
    @WordUnheard 4 роки тому +18

    I love Neil deGrasse Tyson. He really does help make this pandemic a little more bearable.

  • @droniholland7185
    @droniholland7185 3 роки тому +50

    this is absolutely incredibly unconceivable. learning what a googolplex really is, absolutely blew my mind. thank you, Neil.

    • @jlnger149
      @jlnger149 Рік тому +1

      Next is a Googolplexian, which is 10^10^10^100 or 1 x 10^googolplex zeros. And don't get me started on TREE 3 and Graham's Number. 🤯🤯🤯

    • @SmileFlame3
      @SmileFlame3 Рік тому

      @@jlnger149 yes

  • @silvja8868
    @silvja8868 2 роки тому

    How great are these videos?! 💗

  • @favio1415
    @favio1415 2 роки тому +1

    Love this! We just need Neil to speak in various languages :)

  • @bourkey07
    @bourkey07 4 роки тому +8

    You guys have awesome chemistry, I love the show! And I could listen to Neil talk about absolutely anything for hours on end 😂

  • @johnny_veritas
    @johnny_veritas 3 роки тому +22

    I always get a tingling in my spine when Neil gets to the number of stars in the universe.

  • @brandonsg1367
    @brandonsg1367 7 місяців тому +2

    So a googol is 10 quintillion times more than all the particles in the universe

  • @ankitsarkhel1750
    @ankitsarkhel1750 Рік тому +4

    Absolutely loved the explainer. Also, Dr. Neil you forgot to mention the fact that a 3X3 rubik's cube has approximately 43.252003 quintillion different ways to scramble it.

    • @alvaroq2024
      @alvaroq2024 Рік тому +3

      He didn’t forget to mention it, it just didn’t come up.

    • @chriswebster24
      @chriswebster24 10 місяців тому +1

      Nah, he just didn't know that.

  • @sciencewizard8805
    @sciencewizard8805 3 роки тому +7

    Not the first time I've heard about extraordinary numbers, but it was more interesting than I expected. I love that I think I'll always remember what a Google plex is, and how it compares to all the particles in the universe.

  • @Kevin-ul8ux
    @Kevin-ul8ux 3 роки тому +8

    "...you have 10 to the google power." "Is that called a yahoo?"- the wittiest joke I've heard Chuck make to date.

  • @shanewright4650
    @shanewright4650 Рік тому

    So I've heard about skews number and Graham's number, but how far does it go, which of these values and functions are the biggest?

  • @saxogrammaticus3917
    @saxogrammaticus3917 Рік тому

    Learning is easier with these guys

  • @HiR0SHi.the.D0G
    @HiR0SHi.the.D0G 4 роки тому +62

    I had no idea what Jeff Bezos can do with 1$-bills.

    • @renatoigmed
      @renatoigmed 4 роки тому +2

      try save air companies from bankruptcy maybe?

    • @cryptid1925
      @cryptid1925 4 роки тому +1

      he can go around the earth 200 times and then to the moon and back 10 times

    • @insane_troll
      @insane_troll 4 роки тому +2

      He can't because there aren't that many dollar bills.

    • @cryptid1925
      @cryptid1925 4 роки тому +1

      @@insane_troll If you listened to the whole video carefully, you would know there are enough bills.

    • @GetFunnied
      @GetFunnied 4 роки тому +1

      enslave the world

  • @aaronnalder4177
    @aaronnalder4177 4 роки тому +3

    I read once that there are more possible ways a standard deck of playing cards can be shuffled then there are atoms in the universe. Meaning, when you shuffled a deck of cards, it's very likely that no other deck of cards has ever been in that order, ever! Pretty cool stuff.

  • @bradarmagost1541
    @bradarmagost1541 Рік тому

    Is that the U.S. Space Force logos @ 1:22 in the bottom the left of nice in the pic frame!? If so nice touch!

  • @Rob-gr4yl
    @Rob-gr4yl 3 роки тому

    I have a question. Do we have the computing power and memory to write down a google plex? and if so, how many pages of let’s say a word document would it be?

  • @lifecoachanant
    @lifecoachanant 3 роки тому +3

    Amazingly informative and entertaining.

  • @mrs.morris5506
    @mrs.morris5506 3 роки тому +5

    Tyson never ceases to amaze. Love it!

  • @CoolCJ1410
    @CoolCJ1410 Рік тому +1

    Petition for Niel to make a StarTalk explaining small numbers

  • @sphumelelesijadu
    @sphumelelesijadu 2 роки тому +1

    It's when Chuck said a Yahoo for me😂😂

  • @jdderew1
    @jdderew1 4 роки тому +4

    15:49 ''That's insane''
    Yep xD This bit had me laughing for a while, thanks for the video!

  • @zangorajura
    @zangorajura 4 роки тому +18

    Dayum, chuck does really need money judging from the amount of ads in this video lol, love the vid content anyway as always ❤️

  • @EgonFreeman
    @EgonFreeman 3 роки тому +1

    @13:15 " Okay, but! That doesn't stop _mathematicians._ " ... if there was ever a catchphrase for maths (or science in general), this would be it.

  • @vassa1972
    @vassa1972 2 роки тому

    Great stuff

  • @cobraman90
    @cobraman90 4 роки тому +5

    This is just mind blowing!
    Side note: I love how the ads for his videos are of him 🤣

  • @jennj8149
    @jennj8149 4 роки тому +3

    I love how they make it seem so interesting!! (that’s because it is) And they are the best duo ever!!!

  • @gheorghecaluser6454
    @gheorghecaluser6454 Рік тому

    I learn a lot watching your channel but at the same time I have a good time. It's like watching Oliver Hardy and Stan Laurel (Oliver with a Nobel prize and Stan with another Nobel in stand un comedy)

  • @shpresim43
    @shpresim43 Рік тому +1

    He taught me more about numbers and astronomy than all my teachers together.