Bruz just accept it, it’s not that the 4 cylinder is amazing it’s just that the vdj is shit unless your pour heaps of money into it like the rest of a 79
@@SmartAceHole82 Idealisticly 700cc per cylinder: a 2.8L(75 HP per litre) inline four, a 4.2L(70 HP per litre) inline six, or a 5.6L(65 HP per litre) V8 for LC 70 series. 4.5L is an awkward displacement for a utilitarian work vehicle with a V8. But the 3.3L(75 HP per litre) V6 diesel would be would be my choice of the current Toyota engines if the reliability is there.
One of the best reel life test i have ever seen, very well done and the result is phenomenal 🤠👍 Great job Toyota, now just waiting for the towing results on 35s.
If you have ever seen one of these toyota V8 diesels out of the ute for such a small displacement a baby V8 really they are externally bigger than they need to be and quite heavy. I feel if the hp & torque are the same for both engines just losing that overweight underperforming slug of a V8 would see the 4cyl turbo diesel at a significant advantage in the power to weight ratio. The V8 lovers should call for another test with the trays loaded equally and tow weights equal then throw that boat anchor of a V8 on top of the 4cyl diesel as well, should make for a more interesting test but even then the 4cyl diesel would still win. Walter.
In the United States 35 inch tires are considered small and everyone changes the gears in the axles. No one goes on a two week expedition like the way it is considered normal in Australia. It’s just so interesting to see how different it can be in another country.
The majority of USA people wold not know how to drive/or need to drive in 35 inch tyres - seems to be more penis than driving skill as required. Yes - I said it - most people in USA do not tackle the terrain they build their trucks up for. Penis.
Thats true. But how many of these huge trucks with 37s+ are going places where you need them? I guess a lot of them got big tires to compensate for something not so big and it's not their ego
Did you compare the fuel economy? Apart from that, I think the conclusion is clear, sell the V8 whilst value is still there! There's going to be a crazy waitlist on the auto 76! The remaining test is of course, longevity/duration and on that point only time will tell! Thanks, Ronny, another very informative video.
It's one of your best videos, mate. The editing was excellent. Love the ghosting effect, and it was clever marketing using your new patches as a marker and Trav using your armrest. Great results, too, for the 76. I will never sell my V8 Troopy mate, nor should you. Say bye to your 79 though. Cheers, John from Darwin
Search UA-cam for 3 videos: 1) Fullboost: GVM test where both cars are factory but they put an additional 500kg on the 2.8 with the steel 33” and only alloy 31” on V8 and it still looses. 2) Car Expert: Towing tests both standard everything hauling a dynometer to set a controlled test. 3) Auto Expert: Search for a video with a Troopy and listen to an actual engineer and learn.
Upgrade to dba disc rotors and extreme pads, no fade and braking is super smooth on steep downhills. Then add 165kw Toyota tune from Rogue/South African models and it’s a weapon. Don’t forget aftermarket transmission cooler.
He's done this elsewhere I think, the fuel use with 35's is much worse. But it's irrelevant, most guys with 35:s have social media show vehicles they make money from.
Interesting comparison, I’ve had the 79 V8 for 10 years and it’s been a reliable platform. Seriously thinking about the 76 Auto mainly for the wife but also the convenience around town. The 76 is pretty adaptable and has some advantages for sure.
Certainly interesting. That said I want to see how the towing does with the 35's. One thing I still want to note(even though I was a little surprised) is a Automatic will always do better at transferring Torque allowing for a smoother operation. That doesn't necessarily mean that it will do the best job overall as that will depends on the vehicle with engine. Some will do better than others
Me, I'm still running around in my LN106 and I can't see that changing any time soon. I'll probably be buried with that thing. But the advances in auto transmission over the decades have well and truly caught up and anyone looking at a new 4WD would be nuts to go for a manual. Auto now makes far more sense and gives far greater capability. If I were looking for a new machine it'd be an auto, hands down.
It's a sign of maturity, admiting the more advanced 2.8l auto is better the the old 4.5l manual. I'd be curious to know the l/100km fuel consumption comparison for each speed for each vehicle.
Hi guys, just want to share my stats regarding LC76 plus 19.6 Jayco over 12 months . SETUP = ,2008 LC76 (315.75.16 tyres) towing 19.6 Off road Jayco. Stock motor ,no tune ,airbags in rear for leveling when fully loaded. Consumption over 12 months = May 23 to Feb 24 Towing speed highway = 90 km perhour is my cruizing speed Distance driven = 16494 km Fuel economy (avg) 17.9 l/ km this is for total km driven Fuel economy (min) 13.29 l/ km this is town driving or slow , easy pace Fuel economy (max) 23.57 l/km this is wind / mountain and heavy sand Total fuel used 2982.1 lt Ave price from Perth to Melbourne , then up to Brisbane ,longreach ,mt Isa , Townsville Frazer Island to Brisbane. So a mixed terrain. Cost 35.9 cent per km. So my experience with an old LC 76 v8, 439,000km on the clock, is the deeper you push the peddle (i.e. increase the wind pressure on the front of the vehicle , the consumption goes up exponetially.) At 85 to 90 km , the old girl and caravan does 18 to 19 lt/km, push it any harder and it cost you a box of beers :)
I would love to see the new Landcruiser up against a v8 with a 6 SPEED auto conversion. I recon this is what I would do instead of buying a new Landcruiser it would be much cheaper too.
Its interesting. As we get older we like comfort and convenience ie auto over manual. As an employer, I would have a duty of care to provide a rock to staff driving the manual to mitigate handbrake failure. Boys old school needs aside, the auto will be a better choice for modern comfort work in a 79.
Ngl it’s kinda sad how many people cried over the fact that it was a “unfair test” because of tyres and then there’s people saying to add more weight to the car, I say take some copium since the 4 cylinder is newer and has better performance for only 4 cylinders
How many inches is the lift kit? I just bought the new 70 pick up and I’m going for 3” lift with the OME MT64 parabolic with air bags and going for ‘35 tires.
Hi Ronny... awesome content. Thanks! Question - a while ago you explained in a video that 33s on the hilix ruins yet it has the same 2.8l engine. Can you explain why 33s and 35s are ok on the new landcruiser with same engine?
Shad - don’t do it you will want one. I have a 76 V8 like you and test drove the 78 2.8 and it would murder my V8. Also much smoother and quieter. Nicer on the highway as it’s not revving.
I find all this angst and agony over the introduction of the 2.8 pretty hilarious. But also the never-ending need to modify these vehicles as if the factory spec is critically insufficient! If you’ve used these vehicles for heavy duty work application in the very remote outback (in my case 20+ yrs geological exploration drilling) then you will know that in stock form they are totally capable of dealing with very heavy loads in incredibly rough Outback conditions day in day out, without the need to resort to much in the way of modification. As long as the vehicle is being properly serviced (i.e. not by a Toyota dealership) then the incidence of breakdown will be very low. I couldn’t even begin to imagine how many kilometres our Land Cruisers (and KUN & GUN Hilux) did in the Outback over the years. I suppose I could work it out (its a few million). We bought the vehicles new and traded at 3 years, typical mileage around 200,000km, all outback from the depot to wherever. Delivered in cab chassis format they got a very staunch steel tray, additional fuel filtering (with water trap), auxiliary battery, inverter, UHF & VHF, cellphone antenna, toolkit, medkits. Some got long range tanks and the tool / rod carriers got a pre-registration GVM upgrade. Later all vehicles were fitted with GPS tracking and an EPIRB. But engines, drivetrain, rims, untouched. Same tyre size, just upgraded to 10 ply rated LT / AT. The 1GD-FTV is a very capable motor and proven now in multiple applications across the Toyota world from lighter duty & heavy utes to SUVS, vans, passenger buses / small coaches and Hino trucks. No need to worry!
Really nice comparison. Those steep long descents may be a bit tricky. Any chance you could test how well toyota breaks coolong works? One more thing I was wondering about are the dunes. I usually had the biggest power issues when climbing sandy hills. This could really manifest after upgrading to 35" MT.
I would love to see the auto 76 series vs a 76 or 79 series with the automatic conversion done on the V8 and see what they are both like. I know the automatic conversion is a $30k extra but does it make the v8 worth it to do or should you just buy the 2.8L
I'm not buying a land cruiser for performance as much as I'm buying it for reliability and build quality. What will the higher psi in the 2.8L do to longevity?
Ya'll harp on downhill rolling speed like proper application of the brakes isn't the same thing. It's just resistance to rolling it, all equals the same thing at the contact patch of the tire. A good driver might have one foot on each pedal and even use both simultaneously.
I don't think anyone is doubting that the engine can handle it, the difference in my opinion will be long term reliability. Norway and Iceland are both tiny compared to Australia, and the conditions are completely different. It's very common to have a car on 35s that will also do a 5000km camping trip, or even longer. I'm really curious to see what the long term reliability is with these 2.8s, because in my experience, getting more hp out of a smaller engine usually just means that it doesn't last as long. I'd be very impressed to see a 2.8 with a million kms on it.
I've been wondering about this since I saw the fullboost comparo. It sort of reminds me of my Prado auto only it has real power and proper axles! Autos are super easy to drive offroad.
Is it feasible or practical to add an engine brake or exhaust brake to the vehicle to aid the auto's down hill decent. Electronically similar to a dynatard or other brands?
I find on 34s with the v8 i take off downhill in first low i couldn't imagine the auto, my holden colorado auto though was fantastic just as good as my 79 in first low on the same tracks but I'm talking extremely steep tracks at 3.5t
Its great you can run 35s but for remote travel I will stay with stock sized tyres and steel rims that are available in the remote parts of Australia, it would be a interesting comparison to see if the wheel bearings are effected by the larger and heavier wheels.
Fantastic comparison video. Is the new 2.8l Auto due to emissions or to crack a new market, will be interesting to see. I guess the biggest question is, will it be as reliable as the V8 diesel, only time and km's will tell
Watching this after the Ineos video, what I think will be fascinating to watch is how Ineos will listen to customer complaints and optimise their product, Toyota clearly do not, wheel track, hand break, poor tech, they need to watch out! I drive a Toyota today, but might not be by my next one. It will come down to Ineos reliability 🤔
I'm interested to see some temps. Egt and transmission when towing. I don't think we'll see these things doing heavier work over many years. It really does show up how massive the v8 got detuned by Toyota to make them last longer though.
I used to frown upon automatic transmissions, but after having had one in my last three vehicles, you couldn't pay me to drive a manual anymore. Especially off road. I'll never buy another stick shift.
Downhill assist. V8 - due to extra four cylinders going through retarding force created by suction/vacuum decreasing and slowing the spin of the crankshaft, helping in engine breaking. The more the cylinders, the greater the retarding force provided that decceleration is maximum
NOW, for the revised towing test with comparable tyre sizes
Bruz just accept it, it’s not that the 4 cylinder is amazing it’s just that the vdj is shit unless your pour heaps of money into it like the rest of a 79
Geeezus karen give it a rest. Your v8 is shit.
@@jacksonwelch9870 you're wasting your time, he's a "muh v8" guy.
@@SmartAceHole82 Idealisticly 700cc per cylinder: a 2.8L(75 HP per litre) inline four, a 4.2L(70 HP per litre) inline six, or a 5.6L(65 HP per litre) V8 for LC 70 series. 4.5L is an awkward displacement for a utilitarian work vehicle with a V8. But the 3.3L(75 HP per litre) V6 diesel would be would be my choice of the current Toyota engines if the reliability is there.
better tune and regear the 4cylinder aswell
Congrats on 500k subs Ronny
One of the best reel life test i have ever seen, very well done and the result is phenomenal 🤠👍
Great job Toyota, now just waiting for the towing results on 35s.
If you have ever seen one of these toyota V8 diesels out of the ute for such a small displacement a baby V8 really they are externally bigger than they need to be and quite heavy.
I feel if the hp & torque are the same for both engines just losing that overweight underperforming slug of a V8 would see the 4cyl turbo diesel at a significant advantage in the power to weight ratio.
The V8 lovers should call for another test with the trays loaded equally and tow weights equal then throw that boat anchor of a V8 on top of the 4cyl diesel as well, should make for a more interesting test but even then the 4cyl diesel would still win.
Walter.
In the United States 35 inch tires are considered small and everyone changes the gears in the axles. No one goes on a two week expedition like the way it is considered normal in Australia. It’s just so interesting to see how different it can be in another country.
Because in the US the trucks are the size of a small city so anything would look really small. I own a 76 they are like the size of a JK Wrangler
The US can do anything and still be legal it seems. In Au the tyres have to be within the fenders.
In WA 35 inch tyres and a 2” lift is illegal on most 4WD
Max is 2” total
Not sure how warranties and insurance deal with this
The majority of USA people wold not know how to drive/or need to drive in 35 inch tyres - seems to be more penis than driving skill as required. Yes - I said it - most people in USA do not tackle the terrain they build their trucks up for. Penis.
Thats true. But how many of these huge trucks with 37s+ are going places where you need them? I guess a lot of them got big tires to compensate for something not so big and it's not their ego
This series has changed a lot of peoples minds I reckon, well done Ronnie...
Its basically become a huge ad campaign, if he didn't get that 76 for free he definitely should have.
how ? he has tested it back to back and bought it himself and given honest opinions ? @@CaptLonestar
Did you compare the fuel economy? Apart from that, I think the conclusion is clear, sell the V8 whilst value is still there! There's going to be a crazy waitlist on the auto 76! The remaining test is of course, longevity/duration and on that point only time will tell! Thanks, Ronny, another very informative video.
It's one of your best videos, mate. The editing was excellent. Love the ghosting effect, and it was clever marketing using your new patches as a marker and Trav using your armrest. Great results, too, for the 76. I will never sell my V8 Troopy mate, nor should you. Say bye to your 79 though. Cheers, John from Darwin
Thorough, informative and fun to watch. Love your work guys!
Search UA-cam for 3 videos:
1) Fullboost:
GVM test where both cars are factory but they put an additional 500kg on the 2.8 with the steel 33” and only alloy 31” on V8 and it still looses.
2) Car Expert:
Towing tests both standard everything hauling a dynometer to set a controlled test.
3) Auto Expert:
Search for a video with a Troopy and listen to an actual engineer and learn.
Upgrade to dba disc rotors and extreme pads, no fade and braking is super smooth on steep downhills. Then add 165kw Toyota tune from Rogue/South African models and it’s a weapon. Don’t forget aftermarket transmission cooler.
Ive upgraded my N70 hilux to DBA slotted rotors and Xtreme pads❤ next mod would be rear disc brake convertion so no drums
good to hear dba recommendation instead of bendix who seem to be sponsoring every content creator and his dog
What was the fuel usage comparison? Compared with v8 and also with the standard tyres?
He's done this elsewhere I think, the fuel use with 35's is much worse. But it's irrelevant, most guys with 35:s have social media show vehicles they make money from.
lol @@404errorpagenotfound.6
Channels gotten really good Ronny glad to see you doing well this was a great test
Interesting comparison, I’ve had the 79 V8 for 10 years and it’s been a reliable platform. Seriously thinking about the 76 Auto mainly for the wife but also the convenience around town. The 76 is pretty adaptable and has some advantages for sure.
They did make a 70 auto in the nineties. The 70 Prado.
The hzj77, hzj71, hzj74, hzj73, hzj76, bj74, bj71 also all available in Auto.
Dang!! Are you guys sure 😂😂😂 Thanks Ronny… just keep all three rigs 😊🎉
Certainly interesting. That said I want to see how the towing does with the 35's.
One thing I still want to note(even though I was a little surprised) is a Automatic will always do better at transferring Torque allowing for a smoother operation. That doesn't necessarily mean that it will do the best job overall as that will depends on the vehicle with engine. Some will do better than others
finally at 500k!
Congrats Ronny!
This channel: best thing on internet.
Congrats on 500K subs Ronny!
Great video. The quality is very high, excellent shots/angles, great audio and very good editing. Keep it up.
Did you regear? Or plan to? And does the torque converter still lock up?
Me, I'm still running around in my LN106 and I can't see that changing any time soon. I'll probably be buried with that thing. But the advances in auto transmission over the decades have well and truly caught up and anyone looking at a new 4WD would be nuts to go for a manual. Auto now makes far more sense and gives far greater capability. If I were looking for a new machine it'd be an auto, hands down.
I bet your LN106 is still going strong. My 80 is still bringing me so much joy.
ua-cam.com/video/ZmWMoe-J9zA/v-deo.html
A eight speed auto would be excellent behind the V8, and fuel efficient, but cost of conversion would probably nulify any savings.
Put in a 3 speed transfer case instead.
It's a sign of maturity, admiting the more advanced 2.8l auto is better the the old 4.5l manual. I'd be curious to know the l/100km fuel consumption comparison for each speed for each vehicle.
Very interesting, but I would be concerned about the long term with the 4 Cylinder
I guess it depends on how long you intend to keep the car for
Low pressure V8 vs high pressure 4 cylinder? V8 for sure when it comes to longevity but it should take 300k to stop 4 cylinder. Time will tell.
Plenty of 2.8 litre hiluxes that have been overworked and they're fine.
Select 1st or 2nd gear in the auto , and see if that changes the way it handles hill decent.
Wow this modified 76 series is such a beauty😍
Hi guys, just want to share my stats regarding LC76 plus 19.6 Jayco over 12 months .
SETUP = ,2008 LC76 (315.75.16 tyres) towing 19.6 Off road Jayco. Stock motor ,no tune ,airbags in rear for leveling when fully loaded.
Consumption over 12 months = May 23 to Feb 24
Towing speed highway = 90 km perhour is my cruizing speed
Distance driven = 16494 km
Fuel economy (avg) 17.9 l/ km this is for total km driven
Fuel economy (min) 13.29 l/ km this is town driving or slow , easy pace
Fuel economy (max) 23.57 l/km this is wind / mountain and heavy sand
Total fuel used 2982.1 lt
Ave price from Perth to Melbourne , then up to Brisbane ,longreach ,mt Isa , Townsville Frazer Island to Brisbane. So a mixed terrain.
Cost 35.9 cent per km.
So my experience with an old LC 76 v8, 439,000km on the clock, is the deeper you push the peddle (i.e. increase the wind pressure on the front of the vehicle , the consumption goes up exponetially.)
At 85 to 90 km , the old girl and caravan does 18 to 19 lt/km, push it any harder and it cost you a box of beers :)
I would love to see the new Landcruiser up against a v8 with a 6 SPEED auto conversion. I recon this is what I would do instead of buying a new Landcruiser it would be much cheaper too.
fuel comparison over this test would have also been a great info
Its interesting. As we get older we like comfort and convenience ie auto over manual. As an employer, I would have a duty of care to provide a rock to staff driving the manual to mitigate handbrake failure. Boys old school needs aside, the auto will be a better choice for modern comfort work in a 79.
what was the fuel use difference with the 35s?
These videos keep getting better and better, well done!
10:24 Toyota did, there were auto-options in the very early years. JDM BJ7x often come with an auto.
Ngl it’s kinda sad how many people cried over the fact that it was a “unfair test” because of tyres and then there’s people saying to add more weight to the car, I say take some copium since the 4 cylinder is newer and has better performance for only 4 cylinders
Ronny suggest testing against a v8 auto conversation
Would be interesting but pretty irrelevant when considering it's a $30k modification.
Question: why didnt you use low gear downhill in the 76? With downhill control you would then have much less braking?
How many inches is the lift kit?
I just bought the new 70 pick up and I’m going for 3” lift with the OME MT64 parabolic with air bags and going for ‘35 tires.
Would love to follow the same, “35’s on the 76. What lift have you put on?
That ghosting is coool !! 👍 (comparison) congrats on the 500k🎉
Really nice video guys. Thanx
Hi Ronny... awesome content. Thanks!
Question - a while ago you explained in a video that 33s on the hilix ruins yet it has the same 2.8l engine. Can you explain why 33s and 35s are ok on the new landcruiser with same engine?
Hi, I have just followed your channel. Can I ask how many inch lift is your new 2.8 with 35?
Brand new off the lot. Did you do anything for the break in period?
Im scared to test drive one 😂, looks awesome with 35s and the new look front end
Shad - don’t do it you will want one. I have a 76 V8 like you and test drove the 78 2.8 and it would murder my V8. Also much smoother and quieter. Nicer on the highway as it’s not revving.
@@motorsportfreak1 yeah the 78 would be nice 👍
Who’d have thought?
Just keeps on impressing.
Good video, cheers
I’d like to know the weight difference of these two vehicles?
Another game changing 76 build😂😂
Hi Ronny. Your videos are awesome. Just have a question. What suspension are you using?
What viking plate you gonna get on the wagon?
I find all this angst and agony over the introduction of the 2.8 pretty hilarious. But also the never-ending need to modify these vehicles as if the factory spec is critically insufficient! If you’ve used these vehicles for heavy duty work application in the very remote outback (in my case 20+ yrs geological exploration drilling) then you will know that in stock form they are totally capable of dealing with very heavy loads in incredibly rough Outback conditions day in day out, without the need to resort to much in the way of modification. As long as the vehicle is being properly serviced (i.e. not by a Toyota dealership) then the incidence of breakdown will be very low.
I couldn’t even begin to imagine how many kilometres our Land Cruisers (and KUN & GUN Hilux) did in the Outback over the years. I suppose I could work it out (its a few million). We bought the vehicles new and traded at 3 years, typical mileage around 200,000km, all outback from the depot to wherever. Delivered in cab chassis format they got a very staunch steel tray, additional fuel filtering (with water trap), auxiliary battery, inverter, UHF & VHF, cellphone antenna, toolkit, medkits. Some got long range tanks and the tool / rod carriers got a pre-registration GVM upgrade. Later all vehicles were fitted with GPS tracking and an EPIRB. But engines, drivetrain, rims, untouched. Same tyre size, just upgraded to 10 ply rated LT / AT.
The 1GD-FTV is a very capable motor and proven now in multiple applications across the Toyota world from lighter duty & heavy utes to SUVS, vans, passenger buses / small coaches and Hino trucks. No need to worry!
Y’all are lucky I want a yota diesel in the states!! I want that 70s series Land Cruiser! I have an Fj still below 200k but that thing is cool
The last thing you want to rely on is the hand brake pall inside an auto transmission.
Any auto transmission
Woudl love for you to go though the details of what you did on that suspension.
Be good to get a modified on Travis' cruiser to see what suspension set up and tyres are on his and how he has set everything up
Really nice comparison. Those steep long descents may be a bit tricky. Any chance you could test how well toyota breaks coolong works? One more thing I was wondering about are the dunes. I usually had the biggest power issues when climbing sandy hills. This could really manifest after upgrading to 35" MT.
Could you provide tyre size 35 inch in metric size? Thx. I wanted to upgrade my LC too!
what lift kit did you go with ?
Nice comparison test. I guess we’ll have to wait a while for longevity results.
I would love to see the auto 76 series vs a 76 or 79 series with the automatic conversion done on the V8 and see what they are both like. I know the automatic conversion is a $30k extra but does it make the v8 worth it to do or should you just buy the 2.8L
I'm not buying a land cruiser for performance as much as I'm buying it for reliability and build quality. What will the higher psi in the 2.8L do to longevity?
It will reduce it.
Thank you for killing the on screen close captioning!! ❤
Ya'll harp on downhill rolling speed like proper application of the brakes isn't the same thing. It's just resistance to rolling it, all equals the same thing at the contact patch of the tire. A good driver might have one foot on each pedal and even use both simultaneously.
This guy loves brake fade
I would be adding a tc lockup clutch kit
Great video, thanks
QUESTION...I have a Toyota hiace diesel manual rear wheel..is possible to put a diff lock in this one
nice .. a great rig
We run 37s and even 40s with hiluxes and prados in norway and iceland no problem
I don't think anyone is doubting that the engine can handle it, the difference in my opinion will be long term reliability. Norway and Iceland are both tiny compared to Australia, and the conditions are completely different. It's very common to have a car on 35s that will also do a 5000km camping trip, or even longer. I'm really curious to see what the long term reliability is with these 2.8s, because in my experience, getting more hp out of a smaller engine usually just means that it doesn't last as long. I'd be very impressed to see a 2.8 with a million kms on it.
What tires do you use?
Don't you need to regear the front and rear axle to keep the downhill speed in check in 4lo?? That's pretty critical to regear for crawl speed.
How many inches is this car lifted?
I've been wondering about this since I saw the fullboost comparo. It sort of reminds me of my Prado auto only it has real power and proper axles! Autos are super easy to drive offroad.
Is it feasible or practical to add an engine brake or exhaust brake to the vehicle to aid the auto's down hill decent. Electronically similar to a dynatard or other brands?
Hey do you disconnect your front sway bar when you run rough trails so you can articulate more?
Was the auto in M1 going downhill?
Are you allowed to add an exhaust brake as an aid for going Down hill?
I find on 34s with the v8 i take off downhill in first low i couldn't imagine the auto, my holden colorado auto though was fantastic just as good as my 79 in first low on the same tracks but I'm talking extremely steep tracks at 3.5t
How do you know that it is different in the 35s?
Its great you can run 35s but for remote travel I will stay with stock sized tyres and steel rims that are available in the remote parts of Australia, it would be a interesting comparison to see if the wheel bearings are effected by the larger and heavier wheels.
A mate has the lasted model but still in V8 just how many are there ?
Nice review you did a could job 👍but personally I’d rather have a manual any day of the week coupled to a 1Hd
Fantastic comparison video. Is the new 2.8l Auto due to emissions or to crack a new market, will be interesting to see.
I guess the biggest question is, will it be as reliable as the V8 diesel, only time and km's will tell
A comparison of the fuel consumption and the effect of the 35's would have been interesting.
You should try to regear the axles
Need some 75 series stickers mate for us old school owners
Is that the same engine they put in the 150 we get in the UK?….. I know owners that have had major injector problems at about 8,000 miles…
Nice review guys, I like the auto as well. Cheers
Watching this after the Ineos video, what I think will be fascinating to watch is how Ineos will listen to customer complaints and optimise their product, Toyota clearly do not, wheel track, hand break, poor tech, they need to watch out! I drive a Toyota today, but might not be by my next one. It will come down to Ineos reliability 🤔
Now they have finally put autos in the 70's all they need now is a petrol straight 6.
I personally would go for a 275/75 - 16 All Terrain ..... just to not give it more effort , and put a lift kit for sure.
I'm interested to see some temps. Egt and transmission when towing. I don't think we'll see these things doing heavier work over many years. It really does show up how massive the v8 got detuned by Toyota to make them last longer though.
Would like to see the same full review done once you regear to the appropriate ratio to suit the 35s....then do it all again.
You need to compare the 4cyl against the v8 auto 70
I used to frown upon automatic transmissions, but after having had one in my last three vehicles, you couldn't pay me to drive a manual anymore. Especially off road. I'll never buy another stick shift.
Pretty Interesting how they both compare 🤔 but I see pros and cons in both 😊
Great video mate, extremely interesting 👍
Downhill assist. V8 - due to extra four cylinders going through retarding force created by suction/vacuum decreasing and slowing the spin of the crankshaft, helping in engine breaking. The more the cylinders, the greater the retarding force provided that decceleration is maximum
Should be on 31-33, sweet spot if we consider everything
Are 35" tyres even legal in WA? Mr Google says 50mm diameter bigger.
WA cops aren't like NSW or Vic cops. Only thing a copper has told me to fix on mine (very modest 3" lift and 35s) was when my indicator was blown
Finally 500k!