instead of playing one column I played 2 and just keep track of the different denominations on each column. I won $210 in 20 minutes. I think this is better that way there is alot more winning. You only have a 30% chance of losing. Your at least making some money almost every turn.
@@beefybitcoin8085 No you don't. The casino's margin stays the same no matter how you bet. This guy is a salesman, he posts misleading ''strategy videos'' and the link to his website. Come on, it's almost as obvious as that Nigerian prince trying to clean his billion dollars but needing your money to buy cleaning product.
I tried this Jan 4, 2024 at Aria in Vegas. I use a $1 denom. I put in $100 and cashed out $314. My longest loss streak was 8. It took me about an hour to achieve this win. I like the system.
I actually used this system at an electronic bar machine. Being a poor person I used the 1,1,2,3 etc. as it allowed a one dollar minimum. I always placed the bet on the second 12. I won three for three sessions - I quit each sessions after gaining fifty dollars. It took about twenty minutes to win fifty dollars - I left with a net profit of $155.00 - a meager amount for the high rollers but I was thrilled - I will continue to use this system - thank you very much
@@CasinoMatchmaker Yeah, push someone (who explicitly says he is poor) to keep gambling at a losing game while he clearly doesn't understand he will never turn a profit long term. You are so disgusting, it's unbelievable. No morals at all? Really?
Things to consider before you attempt this system. 1. Every spin you lose increases the probability that you will lose your entire bankroll. 2. There is a 1.3% chance you will lose your whole bankroll every time you restart the system, so if you play the system 50 times there is only a 42% chance you will win each of those 50 times without a single loss. 3. The system will lose your bankroll more often than doubling your bankroll. 4. Waiting for a streak before betting does not improve your odds, once it misses your dozen 5 times in a row, it is just as likely to miss another 11 times in a row vs a dozen that hasn't missed yet.
Thank you so much. Excellent video. You helped me win 800 dollars in Vegas yesterday. Such a good technique. Minimum bet was 3$. I started with $105 using the 3,6,9, 15 technique. Went down to maybe $80 dollars at one stage but it eventually hits your number again and if you stay true to the system you'll be fine. I ended up with 570 and cashed out. Went back on later, started with 145, using exact same technique, went down and lost it all, it missed the middle row maybe 6 times in a row, I put 20 dollars in immediately, thinking "it's gotta hit the middle row again, surely" , and it did, I won and went up to 60. From there using same technique , 3,6,9 etc. I kept going up and cashed out at 501. So I got very lucky the second time. But its definitely the best system I've ever seen/used before.
So here is the thing. His numbers are wrong. On spin bet number 15. You have odd variations to show up at a 96% chance of one of the numbers in that dozen. If it hasn't hit in 15 spins. I have math this out to a perfect degree. I know everything about this sequence bet. This is how you should actually play this bet. You do 2 bets on the dozens. Pick 2 of them. Then what you do is play each of them separate. After 1 of them wins. You move it to the dozen that didn't win. Then you continue in this off set pattern. This does 2 things. 1 it can hedge money for you other bet if you don't win in the sequence for a while. Also it gives you spread and removes you sticking on the same dozen none stop. I like this system better though. You bet 9 splits or 6 streets. You chase the 3 dollars or 4.5 dollars. How you do it is simple. if you lose, you re bet and spin again on same splits or street. Then if you lose 2 in a row. You double it then spin. O any win here at this point after a double you reset the bet to start. If it loses you double move to next stage. This is allowed on etg machines. You cover more numbers then just betting on 1 of the dozens also and the bets don't sky rocket off to the moon like the fib sequence. So like how you did get lucky at the end of that sequence and won. I had a result where I didn't get lucky and lost it all. This is the only way I actually play the fib sequence. I call it the pure degen negative/positive progression system. You do 3 bets on 1:1 odds. Red, small, odd. 3 of the ones that can win together. You play this bets with martingale system until they all win, you remove each bet after a win. Then you take you 3 unit bet plus the 3 unit winnings and move it all to one of the dozens. Then you do a fib sequence on this until a win happens. After this happens. You cover 12 splits on the board regardless of the wins. You can take all the profits and stack the splits a lot if you want. Your choice. The splits will be covering 24 numbers. Now just spam this until you lose. Then martingale it until you win again after the first lose. Then reset and start over. You will be up anywhere from 25 units to 300 units depend on lucky or bad luck during the fib sequence. Bad luck is a early win, good luck win on spin 3-4. This is a negative/positive progression system. It plays every system and rules to all the systems. While giving you more and more casino bank roll to push with.
I have tried the system for 14 days now, mixing with a cornerbet strategy, but not at same time. I was aiming for $30 a day, starting with a $70 bankroll (to small in my opinion, but so it was). After increasing my wins in the first week, I was aiming for $150 a day. And now after 15 days the result is a profit of $1400, without losing a single day. The highest amount I have been beting in a single day was $2075 for a win of $140. One of the best days was $410 bets for a total win of $165. When I started it just took around 5 minutes to win the $30, with a unit size of $3.5. Just love the Fibonacci dozen/column system.
Don't get too greedy...the House can catch up. I spite over 3 tables. Winning £20 each table, I walk away each day up £60. £420 a week for a few hours works. It's not retirement money, but it's money...not greedy
Not to pour cold shower on your good fortune... I had 53 consecutive winning sessions and then LOST IT ALL on the 54th.... CASINOS are not afraid of all the YT WINNING SYSTEMS out there, in fact, they encourage it to lure more players to "WIN" everyday... that is how they make money paying for their electricity bills...
I wish I was as lucky as you. I waited until a dozen or column didn't hit 7 times in a row before I even put bet 1 on and in 64 spins, I went to bet 9 once, bet 11 once, and then finally got cleaned out. I even had almost enough for bet 12 and i bet it and that lost too. I kept watching after I lost everything and the 2nd dozen was frozen for 21 spins in a row. Good luck everyone!
I just left the casino, used this playing one of the 3 12's, $50 bets, increasing $25 per loss, win $2200 in less than an hour. Never went more than 4 losses in a row!! Nice!!
Yeah, even if you tell the truth, It's called a ''small sample''. It doesn't prove the validity of that bs system. You will always lose long term. Always. Stop lying to yourself.
You can overcome the table maximum by dividing your bets. Instead of betting columns, bet the block segments (e.g. 1st 12). Then if you hit the maximum, your next bet is 720. Put 360 on the double street 1-6 and 360 on double street 7-12. Achieves same result as 720 on 1st 12. And, you have used a 0 Euro wheel for your calculations. Using 0/00 wheel the odds of 11 losses in a row are 1.538%. But from a Bayesian view, the odds of the 11th loss GIVEN you lost 10 prior is still 68.42%.
@@joesphcunningham4610 1/2/3 and 4/5/6 are streets. A bet placed on the outside edge at the line dividing the 1 and 4 covers both 'streets' and known as a double street bet. Since it covers 6 numbers it pays 36 /6 = 6 -1 or 5 units on a win.
Just tried this sequence in 2 video terminal casinos. Started with $50 and cashed out $60 in minutes in one location, went to another location and did the same. It may seem like a wee bit but a $20 profit in less than 10 minutes combined, I'd gladly take every time.
I started monitoring immersive roullete results in evolution casino after watching your video. straight losing streak of 12 round happened within first 10 minutes of obervation .
The math in this video checks out except for the "wait for 5 rounds and your chances increase" part. Each spin is an individual event so what happened before does not change the possibility of still hitting the 11 losing streak
Completely agree, I’m glad someone pointed this out. Probability is memoryless, what has happened before has no impact on what will happen next. It’s why those hot or cold numbers on a roulette table mean nothing.
Regarding the math.. You're not considering that by following the sequence you're essentially betting that you won't lose 11 in a row. You are right each individual spin has the same odds. But your betting you won't lose against those odds 11 times consecutively.. Which is where that math becomes true @@agtaylor123
Online Betting Anytime, Anywhere 100% Real Earning With "My-booki" tinyurl.com/2s35chbe fast-paced world of online betting, finding a platform that not only offers endless possibilities but also upholds the values of ethical gaming can be a challenge #MyBooki
At around 2k bets I got wiped out with 18 straigh losses, Eventually it's just getting lucky, and having a big enough bankroll to keep going. Mind you, it's not fib martinagle, I used a 60% increase in each bet as the automation I used it not so advanced to choose % inreases. I was a computing Roulette, I will have to try on a live roulette, but still. for my understanding the loss streak can be infinite.
yes it can. His math is also wrong. On roll spin 15 the % of seeing a number is 96% chance. He has it showing on like bet 44.5. Which is not the bet spin it would be at that % on. It would be around 305. Anything pass this is just insanely unlucky that the numbers aren't showing up. But this is roulette every spin is a 1/38 chance to show up. So every spin is only 31% chance. You don't actually have a 100% chance at any spin. All you have is a more likely hood this number shows up.. This is the only way I actually play the fib sequence. I call it the pure degen negative/positive progression system. You do 3 bets on 1:1 odds. Red, small, odd. 3 of the ones that can win together. You play this bets with martingale system until they all win, you remove each bet after a win. Then you take you 3 unit bet plus the 3 unit winnings and move it all to one of the dozens. Then you do a fib sequence on this until a win happens. After this happens. You cover 12 splits on the board regardless of the wins. You can take all the profits and stack the splits a lot if you want. Your choice. The splits will be covering 24 numbers. Now just spam this until you lose. Then martingale it until you win again after the first lose. Then reset and start over. You will be up anywhere from 25 units to 300 units depend on lucky or bad luck during the fib sequence. Bad luck is a early win, good luck win on spin 3-4. This is a negative/positive progression system. It plays every system and rules to all the systems. While giving you more and more casino bank roll to push with.
Just used, 450$ profit, however I made a slight variation taking a security margin to begin the series. In other words, choosing a dozen after three fails. It allowed me not to become in bankrupt due to my buy in was only 150$. Believe me I saw up to 13 times without hitting a dozen and I survived.
I have modelled this on a spreadsheet, and like most progression betting it eventually catches up with you and you lose too many in a row. It may look good for a little while, but then boom. Mugs game.
That's where you would control your greed with great discipline and only aim for a small win back, maybe $50-$100 per session. Also maybe use intuition and take a random guess that you should stop before your bankroll runs out, so you don't lose entirely everything. But, it is gambling so I know how hard that is lol
@@TheCr0wned it doesnt matter if you bet the next day or a year after. its the exact same chance. sessions are meaningless. one day sooner than later you will start a session and lose all your bankroll before you managed to double it.
I just went to Vegas and used the system at 3 separate casinos and it worked and I beat the casino each time on Roulette. I think was then wanting to up my game and used the system on 2 of the columns with the same betting system. And it worked too. It was confusing remembering the sequencing at times. I’d love to see. Video on this type of betting. 🎉🎉🎉
@@CasinoMatchmaker But wouldn't betting a second column reduce your total amount of spins with the table limit or is the table limit per individual bet?
Hi, I've seen numbers from one column and also one dozen not appear for much longer than 11 spins. It doesn't happen really often, but if it happens when you're playing using this method, you will lose all your bankroll. It's better to bet on what is happening with the number sequence - that is, follow it - rather than betting on what is not happening.
I had to learn and Learn, And LEARN That lessons so many times. That NO Matter how good I did for years planning on what will happen, it was alwys easier to go with the trends happening right in front of me!!! Hard to break the habbit that everyone seems to have, to bet on what trend will happen instead of what is happening!!! ::))
I did the math, if u play this system in this conditions, if you win you get between $5(roll 2) and $175(roll 11) but since its more probable that you win in the earlier rolls your expected win is of $14,30 each time you start the system **IF U WIN**, on the chance that you lose you lose $1160 so the expected outcome of playing like this gets you a net loss of $0,97. Remember that the house always wins and in this kind of roulette they have a 2,7% edge in the 0
Tip 1; make sure u got enough money to lose 11 times in a row. I had €400 lost a couple of times so ended up with €120. I did not had enough to do the 7th spin i think. From €120 I played with €1, instead of €5. Had 2 times that I’ve lost 10 times in a row, but won the 11th. Turned €120 in to €535 in 3 hours
@@abashamzi4480 You would not have the money to do that, you would also keep losing money. I done 1 to 35 thinking that it was fool proof way of winning, and then a losing bet I would double up. However, it is not idiot proof and I lost because you cannot double up on it and make the money back. You have to gamble to make a profit, so if you spend £50, you want to make at least £51. If you are spending £50 but winning £48 all the time doing multiple systems, then you are losing money and will go broke in the end.
@@Timlagor This only works if you actually stop for good. The odds don't care, if you play another round after you won or if you come back 2 weeks later to play again. In the long run you always loose.
This will be my first comment on UA-cam ever. Not really a gambler but I saw this video about 6 months ago and I’m leaving for the Air Force in 2 weeks and left my job but had $800 to mess around with. I treated it like a work shift and said I would do 8 hours in the casino with $5 units. I ended up staying 14 hours and profited $2500!! I went to $445 one time and was sweating profusely lol. So like a smart educated man I went back today and in 2 hours profited $740. I did leave early though because I had to bet $720(360 on 2 different machines) and my heart couldn’t take how nervous I was haha. Still I appreciate the $3220. I will play it two more times and then head off to the military.
Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. If you do keep playing this game you will find, rather quickly, that you are going to lose a lot of money at this game Fact is, let's face it, you already have
You changed my life, stick to the sequence and it'll all work out. Turned 40 into 160 onna $3 minimum double 00 table. Day one. I'll update tomorrow's run..payday is tomorrow
25 into 722 onna electric table. $2 minimum. I'm alright with no critical thinking according to you. Just sharing my experience and how I played. I had no comfort as much as I do now. Just be patient and wait. It'll work or it won't. The sequence always comes back. Sometimes you might need a sh*t ton and at that point I've just said screw it and left. But i never start with more than 50. And I've went more often since my last comment. And I'm still positive off it. My personal rule is if 50 didn't make it, it just wasn't my day 🤷♂️
@@JasonCoffman-xu5ks What's funny is you expect me to comment every win and everytime I gamble. It's been 5 months and you came here just to say sum negative Realistically speaking you cannot win everytime. Most of the time I've gone and taken it slow, with proper bankroll and waiting, I come out profitable. I said this system changed my life. And that is very true. Changed the way i look at roulette and the bet spread involved. I don't see why the excess negativity. It's like you waited 5 months just to hop on and text negativity. If you cannot follow this simple system and make some money, then I understand why your so negative about other people winning. PERSONALLY, I just wanted to win and wanted everyone here to win. The house, the casino, the 'big guy" wins most times. I always root for the small guys and girls. Not rich, not spoiled, gotta work hard. This is a good way to use some small bankroll for some nice traction
I did this for 3 days with only $200 deposited in each day. It worked really well the first two days, and I didn't need the full $1,160 for those two. My third day though, I was doing okay, got up $100 and then I got 8 losses in a row. I had to take the L because 1. I didn't have any more money to potentially lose, and 2. I didn't want to potentially lose more. I will continue to try this method once I have more I can lose though. So far, it is a very good system.
I'm no expert on UA-cam video's, but I've watched a few, and you're the first to add the factor of being patient. Wait for the table to miss a dozen 3-5 times and increase your odds without having to gamble any of your own money. Great video.
You are going to make a profit most of the time, but it is a small profit compared to the big loss when you eventually do lose. Your betting strategy is kind of a slider so you can have incredibly high chances of making profits, but the higher the chances the smaller the profits and the bigger the eventual inevitable loss. Its still pretty cool though. And better to play roulette in a controlled manner to increase youre chances of not losing all your money, even if it reduces your max potential win 😅
I did Fibonacci yesterday on a simulator. $5 on 1st and 3rd 12 and $5 on 2 columns (all placed at the same time). Always followed winning dozen and column. After 3 odds or even in a row (or black/red) I started Fibonacci. Ran it up to $1850 in simulator in about 100 rolls.
I saw this video then tried it on an electronic roulette game at Yonkers and made $250 in a couple hours starting with $200 out of pocket. I'll be trying again next time I go... What simulator do you use?
Good system .... thanks for the video. Limit the losing is one key to win. When losing 7 straight, I prefer to STOP. Go to the bar and have a coffee, enjoy then go home. Tomorrow come again with the system. Casinos don't like gamblers who have self controls, they like you to go hard and losing more. They hate winners, and love losers.
I've been using this exact method, over the last month, online. The results have been MUCH better than I expected. Thank you so much for sharing this with us, God bless.
@@budman-tw6rr - I just keep betting. However, be careful staying on 1 dozen, or, column for to long. I was on the 2nd dozen one game and it missed the hitting the 2nd dozen for 19 spins in a row!!. Maybe, rotate to a new dozen, column after each bet?.
@@Patso65 yes indeed the law of averages would work if you bet columns BUT the odds deem you will ALWAYS lose eventually. Say you cover two columns of 12 (one chip same denomination on each column) - one comes in BUT the other loses you lose one gain one - so profit is one chip. BUT if the 1 column you havent bet on comes in you lose 2. So effectively you have to win twice to cover 1 loss using a 2* 12 column system. The reason you lose is because the odds are 2/1 BUT they should be 3/1
No matter what combination of bets you place, you are just accelerating or delaying the inevitable... loosing. You won't beat the casino edge on the long run, unless you find a flaw on the roulette table. You may cashout with profits many times, but there is going to be that one time your bankroll goes to the gutter. So play for the fun of it and manage your money to bet only what you are ok to loose.
@@0its0not0mine my country, the one which put men on the moon, is currently a scandal among the nations as to maths and physics ability., especially among young folks. The comments under this vid well demo that fact
I be found the one rational person in these comments!!! Precious!!! My nation, the one which put men on the moon, is currently a scandal among the world's nations as for maths ability among the young. You can see this in these lame comments
Made 1200 yesterday at ballys from this strategy. Averaged $170 per hour profit on the video terminal roulette machine which is faster than table. While I was chasing the second column for 10th spin I hit it and then noticed third column hadn’t come out of 6 times so for next bet I went with third column thinking I got 6 free rides and hit it on the 9th spin which means it can go up to 15 times too. Got lucky this time.
Tried this yesterday at the casino, on the hybrid roulette game machines. Started with $200 bankroll, finished with $551 in a couple hours. $351 profit 🎉🎄 I did have a run of 8 misses in a row 🥵 but stayed disciplined and won.
haha me and my buddy came up with this strategy when we were in early 20s (back in 2008). We always waited for 6 minimum times that our numbers didnt hit in a row, before starting our bets. After about a 12 hour day, we finally lost it all with 14 losses, +6 = 20 in a row the numbers didnt hit. We had fun drinking the entire day though and testing our strategy out.
the waiting of 6 times actually meant nothing at all as to what was going to happen. The universe didn't know you wanted those 6 times. The gods of roulette weren't going to reward you for doing that
Iv bin doing this for years I play everyday with the intention of winning $100 it can get boring at times but if your trying the basically print money at the casino this is the way to do it but I do recommend for people that don’t have a lot of money to lose stop if you lose 7 in a row
Online Betting Anytime, Anywhere 100% Real Earning With "My-booki" tinyurl.com/2s35chbe fast-paced world of online betting, finding a platform that not only offers endless possibilities but also upholds the values of ethical gaming can be a challenge #MyBooki
I modified the system for baccarat or even money bets. On a win, I repeat the bet. If it wins, restart the series. If it loses, repeat the bet without advancing the level because the last two bets cancelled each other out. That gives more than 11 tries to hit two in a row. Your odds of losing are over 2000:1 and if you lose your lose only 273 units. So far ;playing baccarat I won over 30 shoes straight without losing any. I also play three hits per shoe, so that's over 90 hits. THANK YOU.🤩🤩
I have tested this out on a simulator. I had one streak of 15 losses of a single column 1 time in 1000 spins. I also add a 0/00 split bet and increase by $1 with each spin during a column bet. Results + $699 for a thousand spins. I would recommend 8 losses before starting a column bet
Fibonacci System on even chance bets works, but it’s not how you described in the video. Starting at 1 unit, you go once up the sequence with every loss, and twice back down with every win. This is because with every win, you’ve made exactly as much back as your last 2 losses. It’s the beauty of Fibonacci. Perfect symmetry. Every time you get back to 0 on the sequence, you’ll have made 1 unit. It doesn’t pay out as spectacularly as a 2:1 bet, but it keeps you at the table longer.
But if you lose 4 bets in a row following the fib sequence... Then you're guaranteed to be a loser as the next bet won't recover your 4 losses (Only your last 2)
@@CasinoMatchmaker Right, you move 2 steps back towards the beginning. The risk is never so high that you can win it all back with one bet. So if you lose 4 bets (1,1,2,3) and win your 5th bet (5), you move 2 steps to the left, and bet 2 units again. You’ll have made back the last 2 bets (2+3). Continue the chain.
Tried this with 20 cents and end up with a €7.20 profit in 50 minutes. Loved it. 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.40 - 0.60 - 1.00 - 1.60 - 2.60 - 4.20 - 6.80 - 11.00 - 17.80 - 29.80 ( and the max is €5000 at my table for dozens ) Also increased my chance by waiting for numbers not played for 3/4 times in a row. I can't see losing money long term to this strategy.
Thank you for the video. While some mathematical genius may pound you with the "Gamblers fallacy" and "the game has no memory", they clearly forgot the true nature of Roulette(I mean the humanly tossed ones, not those electronical or computer screen ones) is not pure mathematic nor statistic. By that I mean is that the spinner start their next spin base on the result of the previous spin. They usually have a SOP of picks up the ball, and after counter spins the roulette for so many seconds, then they toss the ball to either direction or the spinner have a tendency of selecting where they feel like to start their spin. As result, the next spin is pretty much related to the previous, (if the spinner does not have a specific idea in mind,) provided the spinner uses the same strength (which most of the time, they do, especially when it is a seasoned spinner) and tossing the same direction. So the spin result is actually pretty much humanly controlled and with enough practice, the dealer (spinner) can almost hit the same number when they use the same strength, starting point, with the roulette spinning the same direction and they also tossing the same direction as the previous. And obviously when they feel like, they can just randomly toss it and the result will be a random result Good thing is that what you suggested are very small bet amounts, and usually the spinner will not try to catch those bets, but rather the big ones on the numbers. So your theory will work, provided that you did study the spinner a bit, and make sure you don't bet on the neighbour blocks of numbers that the spinner "dislike"
It works and doesn't work. Table limits will result in this failing. I like this system better. This is the only way I actually play the fib sequence. I call it the pure degen negative/positive progression system. You do 3 bets on 1:1 odds. Red, small, odd. 3 of the ones that can win together. You play this bets with martingale system until they all win, you remove each bet after a win. Then you take you 3 unit bet plus the 3 unit winnings and move it all to one of the dozens. Then you do a fib sequence on this until a win happens. After this happens. You cover 12 splits on the board regardless of the wins. You can take all the profits and stack the splits a lot if you want. Your choice. The splits will be covering 24 numbers. Now just spam this until you lose. Then martingale it until you win again after the first lose. Then reset and start over. You will be up anywhere from 25 units to 300 units depend on lucky or bad luck during the fib sequence. Bad luck is a early win, good luck win on spin 3-4. This is a negative/positive progression system. It plays every system and rules to all the systems. While giving you more and more casino bank roll to push with.
you can easily stretch that by doing simple calculations to get more moves. Plus give your self a head start meaning you wait for certain number of losses without betting and when you feel comfy enough you start. I have seen both column and a dozen skip max 27 times, its rare but it does happen so consider this when building your strategy.
I just tested it while listening to the video and profited $20(using $1 bets instead of $5) in 2mins37seconds, now this was a very very short sample and I obviously have only tested it once but it worked for me so you sir get a like and sub
Tryed it, i know u dont wanna hear it, but those 1 in 555 are coming for u if u sit on this tactic. Its my 3rd day playin by these rules, and even after waiting 5 numbers in a row, 2to1 i was aiming for came after 17 rows. I know this is some unpopular opinion, im just sayin its still possible and sooner or latter, those 1 in 555 aint that rare :)
I also prefer dozen / column betting to even chance bets. But I recommend “to go with the wheel” and not stick to the dozen / column that is not appearing for a long time. Bet on what is showing up more often for the moment (works with numbers as well).
So I tested this on a demo of an online roulette game and showed it seemed to work well…I took the plunge and deposited a little cash…playing baby stakes (10p lol)…so far I’m £45 UP!!!! How the heck has that happened with 10p stakes!? I’m using second column all the time, not changing it…I don’t know how it works but it works…sometimes I will have a high bet but it always comes back around… Finally found something that works for me!
I tried it. Four runs. 1st time - I hit a few singles at the beginning then 10 straight losers, 2nd time - doubled up, 3rd time - wiped out faster than the first time, 4th - another wipeout a little bit slower than the other 2.
I did this simulation in Excel where I drew 100k rounds, and then drew 100k random guesses considering always betting on 2 columns. I got some martingales of 11,14 and even 15x. This becomes unfeasible even starting with a minimum bet.
Online Betting Anytime, Anywhere 100% Real Earning With "My-booki" tinyurl.com/2s35chbe fast-paced world of online betting, finding a platform that not only offers endless possibilities but also upholds the values of ethical gaming can be a challenge #MyBooki
4th day (8hrs total) with fresh deck studios at Wild casino (online) and i saw the bottom column miss 19x and hit on the 20th ,, within the 20 spins there were 3 green 0 hits and two double number hits , it was insanity ... to be safe with 12's or columns you would need a 6 - 7 trigger and a 15 progression ,, and even then anything is possible but just pray you get to x3 your bankroll before you bust ... and the problem is with a 7 trigger you're only playing maybe 8 times an hr and probably only making 100hr (which is ok but going to take you quite some time to get you to 3x your bust amount)
@@James_Ford4815 Depends. If its a real wheel with not bet interface otherwise it'll get front ran by payback rates. Am in vegas. Tried dimes on video american roulette. Took the L early in my progression to test runs and lost $500 due to due to multiple 50+ streak anytime I got more than 10% up. Played on a 10$ minimum table and smoked it making back 3x what I lost and then some without ever seeing the back half of the progression.
yeah, system massively understates probability of loss and the actual likely size of wins. you're actually rooting for that 11th bet winner, but kinda screwed if it goes over or winning earlier in the sequence.
Used this strategy on a 0 00 machine in las vegas. Doubled my bankroll and then increased my base bet. Was feeling pretty good and all the sudden some gangster looking guy whistled nearby and i lost 12 or 13 in a row. Across from my machine there was also a sketchy hooker lady not playing the machine. Not sure if i was paranoid or just had some bad luck...
Balls don't have memories. I love betting doz/col. 2:1 odds ain't bad. I wait for 9 misses before betting and gone up to 23 misses before stopping (it hit at 26 spins)! A system I have yet to try is to sit one day at your fav wheel and mark when each miss stops. Then calculate when Most of the misses stop. Second determine (based on your base bet amount )how many misses you can go to recoup that loss in say 3 wins. That will determine when you will stop. Example: You decide that most misses end at 7. You start betting at 6 misses. But unlike most bets you don't win at 7 misses. Instead you go up to 10misses and still not win. If you had previously decided that 10 misses was your max you would stop and take your loss Instead of riding the misses all the way to say 16 or 20 misses till you either 1) ran out of $$$ or 2) hit the max bet size I think I will try this out tomorrow when I go to YAMAVA in Southern California. If I do I will let you know my results 😊 Wish me luck, it couldn't hurt🤗
The house will always have the advantage henceforth why the lights still shine in Vegas but this is interesting strategy for the game. I've simulated this with $500 bank roll several times with great success when you set your winning line and walk away when you hit it.....Boarding plane for Aruba to test it on a real table....will follow up!
I had a go of this. I waited 6 spins and then I started the system. I bet a further 8 times, that's a run of 14 spins and then I stopped, it took a further 9 spins before it hit the column. That's a run of 23 spins.
Much worse in video/etg. IGT use unity games which is notoriously bad for modeling probability. I played some dimes and reset my sequence midway for longer runs. Have seen multiple 30+ streaks on those pieces of shit. Definitely play this on a real table with two instances, one hot one cold.
@User - I saw your post and basically dismissed it. A few days later I got caught in a run of twenty spins before hitting first dozen. Not saying I didn't believe you, but now I emphatically believe you.
The maths never change. I checked out the number of times the sixth was a win or loose after 5 losses and it was exactly the same as after 1 loss or even no loss.
I love your statistics and get what you are driving at. I still get stuck on the fact that each number on the wheel has the same odds of hitting each time the marble drops, no matter what happened previously. I Enjoy your channel, many thanks 👍
Thanks for the feedback Chadd. You are right that each spin has the same odds of winning/losing. But by following the sequence until the end you are betting that you won't lose 11 bets in a row. The probability of losing a dozen/column bet 11 times in a row is 98.7% Hope that clarifies the math.
@@CasinoMatchmaker It's bullshit math! You can only multiply to the power of 11 if there is any relation between all spins. In roulette the probability of the outcome of a spin is never related to the previous spin and therefor you can not calculate any winning or losing streak. The fact that many people think you can (made possible by this kind of fake math videos) is a big win for the casino's.
@@fritztweemeter8746it’s true, but future odds are calculable, and cannot be influenced by past results. If you bet, ahead of time, that it will come up red 10 times in a row, your odds are .475^10. That’s real, and valid probabilities. The reverse is also true though, betting that red will NOT come up in the future 10x in a row is .526^10. Also good and true. Whether it’s a good bet or not depends on the payout odds. The casino always has payout odds beneficial to them. They don’t care if any one player wins or loses, over time they get their money from the math. What makes those valid bets is that they ARE connected. They must occur consecutively to win. But, if you spin red 9 times and THEN bet the 11th will be red, the probability is no longer .475^10, they’re only .475. So you will not get paid commensurate odds for .457^10. The bit in this video about waiting x spins for a pattern do not affect your probability or odds. If you look at it as betting that you will not lose your bankroll in whatever number of spins your system dictates, then it’s good math. But it’s not good math to think any previous spins have anything to do with it.
You are not thinking outside the box believing every spin has the same chance equally a number comes up....a very simple to maths...or ask if you are lazy to chatgpt... What is the chances that every single numbers comes up on a European wheel in 37 spins...so based on this i can say never, in another word within 37 spins it will be either repeater/s...or neighbor/s...study the wheel and you will find it does has a pattern but you just need to find it
I work of 5 different tables (all online, virtual and live)) over 3 different sites (cryptocurrency) take £5;at each table. This is £75 a day with a bankroll of 300 which never goes. Even if you lose the bankroll at one site, you won't at another or it's very unlikely. The house roulette cannot catch up because the bets are so small that the likelihood off 11 straight is so so small. Yes the house does have a chance, but only if you remain at the same table. Be disciplined, not greedy.
I tried this system today betting with £s. I scaled down from a start point of 5 to 1. So my stakes were 1,1,2,3.5,8,13,21,34. I played for an hour,with a 15min bathroom break in between. I made £50 profit never staking more than £8. I have just finished playing for 90mins and made a further £80 profit,top stake being £13,which I placed once. I only stopped as I was getting a bit bored.I used the bottom row of numbers
@@CasinoMatchmaker William Hill,which is a live casino. Just tried same with Bet365 and won another £50 max stake £5. I am going to Malta next week for a holiday and may well go to the casino there and try the system out,with real chips
@@CasinoMatchmaker Yeah, he wants to direct you to a casino affiliated to his business, because you playing elsewhere makes him zero money. And while we are here, why would he provide a trick that makes casinos lose money when this is how he makes profits ?
Paying attention in your high school maths and statistics glasses would have been more bulletproof Casinos LOVE all of these strats, simply because none of them can work, no matter how disciplined you might be
@@JasonCoffman-xu5ks LMAO EXACTLY ! With a 5% house edge in the game the translation is the more you play the more you will go down the path of losing. There is NO BET in roulette where the house does not have edge at ALL times. And by the way 5% assumes the game is played to its maximum effecient which most people come no where near.. Roulette system are for the Mathematically Challenged plain and simple !
I used to do something similar and made a lot of dollars , I didn’t know it had a name , it was something I calculated on my own , the challenge was I started much higher and sure enough I lost a lot with incredibly bad streaks , waiting for 5 non hits may take a long long time , I am not one of those patient players !
If you were actually capable of "calculating", you would have known this couldnt work going in Casinos make theor billions off of people who are incapable at basic maths, and rational thinking.
@@JasonCoffman-xu5ks😂have you heard of gambler’s fallacy ! I agree with you actually, although not to blow my horn , but I am more than capable of doing basic math and rational thinking on most occasions
Anything is possible in roulette…no matter how much you want to believe there is some sort of pattern or strategy you can follow, the game will burn you. I like to bet dozens, and I used a strategy where’d I’d start a progression on a dozen that hasn’t hit in 5 times in a row. The amount of times I’ve seen it go 20+ times without hitting is incredible. It’s like the game knows, and it says watch this lol! It doesn’t happen a lot but it only takes that one time to wipe you out.
Heres one of my strategies... Wait 3 to 5 spins like you said for a first or 3rd column. Well yse 3rd column for example Once that happens bet one unit on 19 to 36 If that loses bet on last third If that loses bet one unit on last third qnd 19 to 36 if 19-24 hit you br3ak even rebet. If i lose i either go into the system you have or some times just pick one line in that third. That way you have potentialy dozens of chances for thoae 6 numbers to hit for profit before busting out
I played this strategy this past Saturday and turned my $1200 into more than $4000 in about 2 hours. I had to bet $445 two times winning that 11th bet twice. I played on a digital roulette table in the casino with $1 minimum and $3000 maximum. My betting values were 5, 5, 10, 15, 25, 40, 65, 105, 170, 275, 445. Since the table I played on had a higher maximum than I was expecting I plan to increase my bankroll to extend the number of losses needed to lose it all. Good luck everyone.
I know of a ETG in Las Vegas that has a middle row limit total maximum bet of $3,000.00 so if you have a very long loosing streak it is possible to still win yours very last bet. Unfortunately it is a American wheel but even so, it would allow you to loose 14 times before you are out of money. Possibly? Yes. Likely to happen? No. It is a very good chance you will win by your last bet.
Not being a baller myself , i tried it at minimum of 1, ( ex 1,1,2,3, etc,) and did manage to leave with profits. I did it twice, walked in with $150 and left at 500 both times. Also its small bets so takes some time, i was there for about 1 1/2 hrs each time. but yes you need to have enought money to loose a couple and keep betting,
It's easier to hit 10 losses in a row than you might think. I was in Ceasars the other day and they have 3 roulette tables going. I took a picture of them then went and played some slots coming back and taking a total of 8 pics of the numbers hit boards. 22 spins showing per board. On 6 of the boards the 2 column lost a whopping 8 times, 7 times, 6 times, 7 times 6 times and 5 times in a row. on 1 board the 1st column lost 8 times in a row. and on 1 board the 3rd column lost 7 times. If you played that day and had the misfortune of picking the 2nd column you would have had to have a bank of $1,320 at a $15 min table to win around $200. Granted if you played the right column you'd win a lot but um it still boils down to gambling folks and you have a 1 in 3 chance of losing big $$$ using this system if you pick the unlucky column.
@@hadistocktrader7819 as he said, he uses the fibonacci on 2 separate dozens. in other words, playing the above strategy on 2 dozens instead of just 1 dozen. this requires twice the bankroll of playing just 1 dozen.
you could do six simultaneous bets. all dozens and all columns. use the roulette card that casinos provide to help keep track of your bets. unless you are waiting for 5 skips. but if you play just one bet, look at every single dozen and column while you wait
I got on an online live roulette table with minimum of 0,10. I had a bankroll of 60,90 that way i could lose 13 times in a row, it was a very slow strategy but in 3 hours I doubled my money. So if you like to play slow and win money even if it is small amounts, this is a very good strategy!
I just did a simulation with a live online casino. Testing how this would work over 100 spins, in fact it was 104 spins to stop at a winner. It showed 149pts profit. Biggest losing run was eight and there were two losing runs of seven. I used the first street (1 - 34). I noticed that the 1st 12 also ran up a series of eight losers before one came in. I think theres some mileage in this system, thanks a lot for the video.
I tested this system on a simulator. it took 25 min to double 100$. I guess it works pretty well. Highest loss was at the 9th spin, but it also gives you the best profit
thing is, if the chance is 30%, even after the 100th game its still same chance. unfortunately this is how the game gets you. I know this from experience when you think a number wont bust, it will and has. you think it wont be possible to lose with this strat 30x in a row? you probably never lost 30 times at 50%, dont be fooled lol
Play on!!! All you will demo is that you cannot reduce the house edge with a strat. Btw, this strat is as old as time itself. Even has a well-known name.. It doesn't work
Just lost $232 doing this system. I saw that 2nd 12 hasn't hit in 6 spins, so I placed $1 on it. Lost 11 times in a row from there. Glad to hear lots of others found luck, wish I could find it.
Thats just gamblers fallacy, each spin is independant, doesn't matter if a column doesn't show up 7 times in a row, on the next spin its got the same exact probability of not showing up again.
@@sportspriceanalysis416 Agreed. It's like saying a customer who has been watching the spins after 7 consecutive reds and then decides to back black has an advantage over a newcomer who is unaware of the spin history and bets red. They both have the same chance of winning
It is the law of diminishing averages, which actually does not exist...lol. However, after watching several roulette videos (I had not seen this one yet) I ended up doing almost exactly this system. The only difference is that I would wait until 7 misses before betting, and it would be any 2-1 that had not hit in 7. Being an electronic roulette where you pick your game, AND it also having a 000, I would stake $500, walk away when I was over $100. I did this several times. I got wiped out once, and ended up walking away with $435. Your video is spot on, but you gotta have the guts to stick it out.
I rolled for exactly 100 spins on the simulator using the sequence faithfully. My bet was always on middle column. I finished up $355. There was never any danger. The highest I had to go in the sequence was $65. This is the greatest Roulette system I have ever tried, and I have tried a ton. I can imagine adding the extra step of waiting for 2 or three in a row not hitting before betting would make it even safer.
@@JohnDoe-vc7bw I ran a second run on the simulator using first Dozen this time. After 102 spins I was up $500 and cashed out. Obviously any system run for long periods of time will eventually lose, but the point is, this system is very safe overall and as long as you cash out early and don't run for a long time you can come out ahead. I would never sit there for 100 spins in real life. Since my starting bet is only $5 I would be happy to leave with $50 which is 10 times my starting bet. Remember, in all gambling, greed is what kills you, not the casino.
@@stevem9529 That's insane. The odds of that happening are like 0.13%. But people need to realize odds are usually used with large numbers, so things that seem rare can happen if you just do it a few times. But yeah past 17 I go past my casino's limit if I am starting with $1. What's crazy is how with this method, the longer you go, the more you make. So initially you just win $2 if you hit immediately. But if you win at 17, you win $611. Of course, you lose $4180 if you lose 17 in a row.
@@JohnDoe-vc7bw Yep that's how it always is. It's like you may as well take your life savings, and only bet ONCE. Put it all on 35 of the 37 spaces. With 94.5% odds of winning. So like $1M, you win $28,000. Then never bet again. Casinos aren't dumb, they know these systems. They set the maximums to make sure the odds are always in their favor. Without maximums and having infinite money, you could never lose at roulette.
Seems like a good system you have to be patient but for me I play the straight up split and corners bigger pay puts gambling is luck and timing and having a gut feeling as much as using any system my biggest win on roulette was 5k pounds from 500 pounds I hit 20 my favourite number 3 times on the bounce increasing the bet each time and cashed for 5k 4.5k profit also won 2.5k and 2k a few times just by being patient and using my instincts to when I think the ball will hit my numbers it works for 8 times out of 10 in last 30 years so I stick to it.
I tried this method and it works but I got 2 times no hitting for 11 consecutive times so luckily I have enough money to hit 12th time and than it hit with massive profit, so make sure to have enough money for 12th time also
Those was the best video on following a system for playing roulette I've seen for many years. Well explained, well presented and backed up with math explanations and examples that made the video exciting to watch to the end.
The maths was voodoo maths. Yes, one can do some simple maths to calc the chances of breaking a progression, and you did that. But rest assured the progression will break at some point. So what happens is that you very often win small, and very seldom lose huge, wiping out all those small gains, and more. There is no strat which will erase or even diminish the rather large house edge on this game. Yes, in the vid he presents calculations, but he also refused to do complete calculations which would have shown the truth
Started off really well, just keeping to the £1 min start point. Would leave at least 4 before starting to bet. Doing ok, then wiped out with an 18 spin losing streak. Not sure what the odds are of 18 spins without winning! So, this is certainly not perfect strategy as one huge loss wipes out all profit and bankroll!
Just tested this system online and it does surprisingly work. Only once did I run up to 8 losses in a row but won on the 9th spin. Otherwise it was usually within 6
@@CasinoMatchmaker Just ran it again and took the balance from 2k to 10,370. Not bad in an online demo but scary to try at a live table. I'll need to run it on a few different ones online and then go live at the casino on the $5 min.
@@MikeGervasi Don't. It's not real. You can't beat the basic math parameters, no matter how you twist your betting pattern. This idiot is trying to lure people to his gambling website with his videos, there is no other purpose.
Just as a follow up. Seems the online system (for real money) at first was playing normally. I took $500 up to $3000 within 15 mins. Came back a bit later and the system SEEMED to have adjusted to my play and I lost it all. I gave up gambling after that and haven't played since. The system/game is rigged against you.
thank god someone is finally talking some sense. EV is the way to look at any betting situation. The EV is negative and will always be negative when the payout is less than the odds ratio. To break even on a 2:1 you would need to hit 1 out of 3 times, or (12 out of 36 times) You can't hit 12 out of 36 times when a "0" or "00" is on the wheel, There are now 37 or 38 numbers on the wheel and that's what gives the house an advantage and gives you a negative EV
I used this tonight playing online live roulette and more than doubled my bankroll. I played starting with 10c plays and gave myself 11 chances to play which maxed my final bet at 8.90. I started with 23.20 and ended up with 48.50 before walking away which took 2 hours. 3 times I ended up on my max bet which wasn't fun. I would most times bet in 3rds which hadn't landed in 3 spins, sometimes 4. If you're playing low this is fine but I wouldn't like the feeling of playing higher stakes as I seen quickly you can almost lose everything.
Used this system and went 18 bullets deep. Heads up y’all the wheel has no mercy. I turned 5.5k into 15k in 20 min but lost it all going 18 Bullets deep. It’s great when it’s hitting and only going 5-8 loses then hitting your number to reset but when the wheel starts doing what it wants hard to wager a $8900 ball but sometimes I guess you gotta have the nuts to spin the ball. 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️ good system if your bankroll is 25k and up
I was using this strategy for few days, till today it screwed me over. Didn't hit the 3rd dozen for straight 22 times. and another time straight 17 times. lost my buy in and more hahahaha. Just be careful guys. When the odds not on ur side then it's not. It's a good strategy but there's the 1% of time u lose it.
While this system can work in the short term for some small profits, it is still a negative EV betting system. I calculated the EV to be about -1.63. As always the odds will be in the casino's favor, and any short term gains you make should not be seen as a way to best the system.
Thanks Jordan. Are you playing online? You can easily find tables with single zero which I would highly recommend. Playing a double zero wheel your chances of losing increase to 68.4% each spin
The probability that the longest losing streak is 11 equals 1.3%, ...AS LONG AS YOU PLAY 11 TIMES ONLY. If you increase the number of rolls in the sequence, that probability will progressively increase, and sooner or later, you will encounter a longer streak. For example, in a sequence of 100 rolls, the probability of encountering a losing streak greater than 11 is approximately 25%. This can be easily simulated using a spreadsheet. In summary, it seems like a reasonable method, but not as good as 99%. Be careful with your money, or even better, don't think you can play roulette for a living!
I do....if you stick to one table, yes, the probability increases. If you change tablets (online virtual and live) the probability keeps at bay....long enough to cover your bankroll. Once you cover your bankroll, withdraw. You can keep doing this. Ive been for over two years. (earning €500 a week for 1-2 hours a day)I'm disciplined and not greedy
@@centenarians72 it’s impossible to consistently win at roulette for the long term no matter what strategy you use except a limitless infinite martingale. I’d be very surprised if you managed to do what you claim (like win every day for two years) cause the math would be against you in the long run.
@@AjejeB if you play online roulette, over several tables, with small bets only taking small amounts, then you can. The house only has the edge if you stay at a table too long. It's about patience. Some virtual tablets have glitches that allow you to cover red n black. Do it several times and watch the pattern. Plus you only lose if you lose your bankroll. I haven't yet, and even if I lose my £300 bank roll, I've not lost it because I've been winning more....I'm happy
“Losing streak greater than 11 is ~25% “ what about you wait for 5 consecutive losses before you enter so this will make the system 16 losing streak >>> what’s the odds on that please ?
This system is just working perfect. But it is difficult to hold on the needed discipline. If you ever gambled, you have seen winning big in minutes. After that trill it feels frustrating winning very small in 30-40 minutes. But winning small is better than losing which we forget while playing
@@CasinoMatchmaker I am finding though, The probability of a number in any one row not being hit 16 times in a row on an American roulette wheel (including 0 and 00) is 0.295%, which translates to odds of about 1 in 337.84.
for anyone watching this... take a first year probability statistics course or simply search up the definition of independant events... also bare in mind that the probability of taking the number of turns you would need to double your entry bet without hitting the required losing streak is just under 1/3
After hit table max, couldn't you spread the additional (needed) risk amount on the individual numbers within the column, or dozen that your outside bet is on(?). I mean, obviously you hope don't doesn't come to that, but could be, a potential workaround? Say you need to risk 720 on next spin (from your example - after 11 losses)... each 2/1 odds bet,includes 12 individual numbers, so, bet 20 on each number (of the dozen you're playing) for a risk of 240, leaving you able to risk 460 on the outside bet
the part at 12:00 is wrong, waiting for it to lose 5x in a row does not change the prob of anything odds are odds and reset each occurrence. Please don't put bad information into gamblers hands.
Wanted to type the same, listen to this guy. A roulette wheel does not have any memory of past spins, past spins do not influence future outcomes. This is basic probability theory.
that's not what i said. Telling people its that much harder to lose is wrong. Sure the odds of x amount in a row is harder with 5 more occurrences but your odds to lose when starting on spin 5 are exactly the same. @@boudabousrami844
A roulette wheel definitely has a MEMORY!. I consistently win EVERY TIME! Because there are patterns. When you learn to recognize the patterns you cannot be beat!!!.
Find the best casino for you ➡ casinomatchmaker.com/quiz/
Никогда не играйте в онлайн казино. Там нет честных!
When playing Fibonacci on even money bets you aren't supposed to restart completely after a win. You are just supposed to jump back two steps.
instead of playing one column I played 2 and just keep track of the different denominations on each column. I won $210 in 20 minutes. I think this is better that way there is alot more winning. You only have a 30% chance of losing. Your at least making some money almost every turn.
@@beefybitcoin8085 No you don't. The casino's margin stays the same no matter how you bet. This guy is a salesman, he posts misleading ''strategy videos'' and the link to his website. Come on, it's almost as obvious as that Nigerian prince trying to clean his billion dollars but needing your money to buy cleaning product.
agree...take a pen and paper and keep track.. prints money@@beefybitcoin8085
I tried this Jan 4, 2024 at Aria in Vegas. I use a $1 denom. I put in $100 and cashed out $314. My longest loss streak was 8. It took me about an hour to achieve this win. I like the system.
Greetings to you costarr, Does the Aria in Vegas have a European table or did you play on a US 0,00?🙏
@@nlsndhenry my machine was a double 0. I don't know if MGM properties have single 0
So play on!!! How could you afford not to???
The fact is, you are going to lose a lot at this game, no matter what your strat might be
It's still stupid
The make $1 tables in Vegas???
I actually used this system at an electronic bar machine. Being a poor person I used the 1,1,2,3 etc. as it allowed a one dollar minimum. I always placed the bet on the second 12. I won three for three sessions - I quit each sessions after gaining fifty dollars. It took about twenty minutes to win fifty dollars - I left with a net profit of $155.00 - a meager amount for the high rollers but I was thrilled - I will continue to use this system - thank you very much
Nice work Mike!
$50 in 20 minutes is always good !
Don't! Study the law of large numbers and calculate how long it should take for you to loose everything. Thank me later.
@@CasinoMatchmaker Yeah, push someone (who explicitly says he is poor) to keep gambling at a losing game while he clearly doesn't understand he will never turn a profit long term. You are so disgusting, it's unbelievable. No morals at all? Really?
@@jagsuprising2389why there are always people like u that ruin everything
How would u do this system if you started at 1 dollar
Things to consider before you attempt this system.
1. Every spin you lose increases the probability that you will lose your entire bankroll.
2. There is a 1.3% chance you will lose your whole bankroll every time you restart the system, so if you play the system 50 times there is only a 42% chance you will win each of those 50 times without a single loss.
3. The system will lose your bankroll more often than doubling your bankroll.
4. Waiting for a streak before betting does not improve your odds, once it misses your dozen 5 times in a row, it is just as likely to miss another 11 times in a row vs a dozen that hasn't missed yet.
Finally someone making some sense! 👍
Wish I read this before I tried it. Lost my bankroll following this strategy after this guy said its a 98% wr strat. Barely played for 20 mins.
Playing online… the 11 times without a winner happens quite frequently
It’s good at times but will take you out every time if you play it
Roulette is random. In the long run, your buying £36 for £37, end of story 😂
If it missed your dozen 20 times, would you not be tempted???? 😂
Thank you so much.
Excellent video.
You helped me win 800 dollars in Vegas yesterday.
Such a good technique.
Minimum bet was 3$.
I started with $105 using the 3,6,9, 15 technique.
Went down to maybe $80 dollars at one stage but it eventually hits your number again and if you stay true to the system you'll be fine. I ended up with 570 and cashed out.
Went back on later, started with 145, using exact same technique, went down and lost it all, it missed the middle row maybe 6 times in a row, I put 20 dollars in immediately, thinking "it's gotta hit the middle row again, surely" , and it did, I won and went up to 60. From there using same technique , 3,6,9 etc. I kept going up and cashed out at 501.
So I got very lucky the second time. But its definitely the best system I've ever seen/used before.
So here is the thing. His numbers are wrong. On spin bet number 15. You have odd variations to show up at a 96% chance of one of the numbers in that dozen. If it hasn't hit in 15 spins. I have math this out to a perfect degree. I know everything about this sequence bet. This is how you should actually play this bet.
You do 2 bets on the dozens. Pick 2 of them. Then what you do is play each of them separate. After 1 of them wins. You move it to the dozen that didn't win. Then you continue in this off set pattern. This does 2 things. 1 it can hedge money for you other bet if you don't win in the sequence for a while. Also it gives you spread and removes you sticking on the same dozen none stop.
I like this system better though. You bet 9 splits or 6 streets. You chase the 3 dollars or 4.5 dollars. How you do it is simple. if you lose, you re bet and spin again on same splits or street. Then if you lose 2 in a row. You double it then spin. O any win here at this point after a double you reset the bet to start. If it loses you double move to next stage. This is allowed on etg machines. You cover more numbers then just betting on 1 of the dozens also and the bets don't sky rocket off to the moon like the fib sequence.
So like how you did get lucky at the end of that sequence and won. I had a result where I didn't get lucky and lost it all.
This is the only way I actually play the fib sequence. I call it the pure degen negative/positive progression system. You do 3 bets on 1:1 odds. Red, small, odd. 3 of the ones that can win together. You play this bets with martingale system until they all win, you remove each bet after a win. Then you take you 3 unit bet plus the 3 unit winnings and move it all to one of the dozens. Then you do a fib sequence on this until a win happens.
After this happens. You cover 12 splits on the board regardless of the wins. You can take all the profits and stack the splits a lot if you want. Your choice. The splits will be covering 24 numbers. Now just spam this until you lose. Then martingale it until you win again after the first lose. Then reset and start over.
You will be up anywhere from 25 units to 300 units depend on lucky or bad luck during the fib sequence. Bad luck is a early win, good luck win on spin 3-4. This is a negative/positive progression system. It plays every system and rules to all the systems. While giving you more and more casino bank roll to push with.
I have tried the system for 14 days now, mixing with a cornerbet strategy, but not at same time. I was aiming for $30 a day, starting with a $70 bankroll (to small in my opinion, but so it was). After increasing my wins in the first week, I was aiming for $150 a day. And now after 15 days the result is a profit of $1400, without losing a single day. The highest amount I have been beting in a single day was $2075 for a win of $140. One of the best days was $410 bets for a total win of $165. When I started it just took around 5 minutes to win the $30, with a unit size of $3.5. Just love the Fibonacci dozen/column system.
Love this! Nice work it really is a great system
Can you explain to me how you bet, thank you
@@jjjhhh1112 indeed i wanna know the corner bet strategy dat u do with fibonacci
Don't get too greedy...the House can catch up. I spite over 3 tables. Winning £20 each table, I walk away each day up £60. £420 a week for a few hours works. It's not retirement money, but it's money...not greedy
Not to pour cold shower on your good fortune... I had 53 consecutive winning sessions and then LOST IT ALL on the 54th....
CASINOS are not afraid of all the YT WINNING SYSTEMS out there, in fact, they encourage it to lure more players to "WIN" everyday... that is how they make money paying for their electricity bills...
I had to bet on the 11th spin twice on a $5 table. That pressure probably aged me 40 years.
Haha that is intense!
😂😂😂😂😂😂
But you won, right?
I wish I was as lucky as you. I waited until a dozen or column didn't hit 7 times in a row before I even put bet 1 on and in 64 spins, I went to bet 9 once, bet 11 once, and then finally got cleaned out. I even had almost enough for bet 12 and i bet it and that lost too. I kept watching after I lost everything and the 2nd dozen was frozen for 21 spins in a row. Good luck everyone!
I understand the pressure
I just left the casino, used this playing one of the 3 12's, $50 bets, increasing $25 per loss, win $2200 in less than an hour. Never went more than 4 losses in a row!! Nice!!
Yeah, even if you tell the truth, It's called a ''small sample''. It doesn't prove the validity of that bs system. You will always lose long term. Always. Stop lying to yourself.
Congratulations on your outcome. What do you do after a win? Do you keep betting or wait for "a couple losses" then bet again?
That doesn’t make sense when he says increasing $25 per loss
@@Dinkwadd it doesn't this guy did use the system at all. He did something else.
How stupid can you be? THIS system would NEVER add up to a $75 bet after a loss starting with $50. WTF is wrong with you???
You can overcome the table maximum by dividing your bets. Instead of betting columns, bet the block segments (e.g. 1st 12). Then if you hit the maximum, your next bet is 720. Put 360 on the double street 1-6 and 360 on double street 7-12. Achieves same result as 720 on 1st 12. And, you have used a 0 Euro wheel for your calculations. Using 0/00 wheel the odds of 11 losses in a row are 1.538%. But from a Bayesian view, the odds of the 11th loss GIVEN you lost 10 prior is still 68.42%.
What’s the double street
@@joesphcunningham4610 1/2/3 and 4/5/6 are streets. A bet placed on the outside edge at the line dividing the 1 and 4 covers both 'streets' and known as a double street bet. Since it covers 6 numbers it pays 36 /6 = 6 -1 or 5 units on a win.
Please could you lecture me on this your strategy
1to 18 and 19 to 36 you mean
Would that be $60 on each number 1-12?
Just tried this sequence in 2 video terminal casinos. Started with $50 and cashed out $60 in minutes in one location, went to another location and did the same. It may seem like a wee bit but a $20 profit in less than 10 minutes combined, I'd gladly take every time.
So play on! You will prove that you wont win. And it wont take a very large amount of time to prove that
I started monitoring immersive roullete results in evolution casino after watching your video. straight losing streak of 12 round happened within first 10 minutes of obervation .
me too it happen to me 9 round in row . really , i doupt about Evolution casino but i don't have another choice in my country
The math in this video checks out except for the "wait for 5 rounds and your chances increase" part. Each spin is an individual event so what happened before does not change the possibility of still hitting the 11 losing streak
Completely agree, I’m glad someone pointed this out. Probability is memoryless, what has happened before has no impact on what will happen next. It’s why those hot or cold numbers on a roulette table mean nothing.
but the row odds change @@agtaylor123
Regarding the math..
You're not considering that by following the sequence you're essentially betting that you won't lose 11 in a row.
You are right each individual spin has the same odds.
But your betting you won't lose against those odds 11 times consecutively.. Which is where that math becomes true
@@agtaylor123
Online Betting Anytime, Anywhere
100% Real Earning With "My-booki"
tinyurl.com/2s35chbe
fast-paced world of online betting, finding a platform that not only offers endless possibilities but also upholds the values of ethical gaming can be a challenge
#MyBooki
i mean it is kinda true though, your odds still increase probability wise if you wait 5 spins, even though every roll is independent.
At around 2k bets I got wiped out with 18 straigh losses, Eventually it's just getting lucky, and having a big enough bankroll to keep going. Mind you, it's not fib martinagle, I used a 60% increase in each bet as the automation I used it not so advanced to choose % inreases. I was a computing Roulette, I will have to try on a live roulette, but still. for my understanding the loss streak can be infinite.
yes it can. His math is also wrong. On roll spin 15 the % of seeing a number is 96% chance. He has it showing on like bet 44.5. Which is not the bet spin it would be at that % on. It would be around 305. Anything pass this is just insanely unlucky that the numbers aren't showing up. But this is roulette every spin is a 1/38 chance to show up. So every spin is only 31% chance. You don't actually have a 100% chance at any spin. All you have is a more likely hood this number shows up..
This is the only way I actually play the fib sequence. I call it the pure degen negative/positive progression system. You do 3 bets on 1:1 odds. Red, small, odd. 3 of the ones that can win together. You play this bets with martingale system until they all win, you remove each bet after a win. Then you take you 3 unit bet plus the 3 unit winnings and move it all to one of the dozens. Then you do a fib sequence on this until a win happens.
After this happens. You cover 12 splits on the board regardless of the wins. You can take all the profits and stack the splits a lot if you want. Your choice. The splits will be covering 24 numbers. Now just spam this until you lose. Then martingale it until you win again after the first lose. Then reset and start over.
You will be up anywhere from 25 units to 300 units depend on lucky or bad luck during the fib sequence. Bad luck is a early win, good luck win on spin 3-4. This is a negative/positive progression system. It plays every system and rules to all the systems. While giving you more and more casino bank roll to push with.
@@fighterpimp it doesn't matter what strat you use, it cannot work to give you a profit
Just used, 450$ profit, however I made a slight variation taking a security margin to begin the series. In other words, choosing a dozen after three fails. It allowed me not to become in bankrupt due to my buy in was only 150$. Believe me I saw up to 13 times without hitting a dozen and I survived.
Nice work! I like that variation
I have modelled this on a spreadsheet, and like most progression betting it eventually catches up with you and you lose too many in a row. It may look good for a little while, but then boom. Mugs game.
That's where you would control your greed with great discipline and only aim for a small win back, maybe $50-$100 per session. Also maybe use intuition and take a random guess that you should stop before your bankroll runs out, so you don't lose entirely everything. But, it is gambling so I know how hard that is lol
Walking away with small wins helps the odds. But even this does not work. @@TheCr0wned
@@TheCr0wnedhappens to me once with 11 streaks not hitting, lost all my bankroll.😂
@@TheCr0wned it doesnt matter if you bet the next day or a year after. its the exact same chance. sessions are meaningless. one day sooner than later you will start a session and lose all your bankroll before you managed to double it.
So it took a computer simulation to make such a simple conclusion> Lol
I just went to Vegas and used the system at 3 separate casinos and it worked and I beat the casino each time on Roulette. I think was then wanting to up my game and used the system on 2 of the columns with the same betting system. And it worked too. It was confusing remembering the sequencing at times. I’d love to see. Video on this type of betting. 🎉🎉🎉
Awesome thats great to hear.
I plan to make a video betting on 2 columns at the same time with this system!
@@CasinoMatchmaker But wouldn't betting a second column reduce your total amount of spins with the table limit or is the table limit per individual bet?
Hey buddy, if this actually worked, casinos wouldnt be dealing roulette
Hi, I've seen numbers from one column and also one dozen not appear for much longer than 11 spins. It doesn't happen really often, but if it happens when you're playing using this method, you will lose all your bankroll. It's better to bet on what is happening with the number sequence - that is, follow it - rather than betting on what is not happening.
I had to learn and Learn, And LEARN That lessons so many times. That NO Matter how good I did for years planning on what will happen, it was alwys easier to go with the trends happening right in front of me!!! Hard to break the habbit that everyone seems to have, to bet on what trend will happen instead of what is happening!!! ::))
I did the math, if u play this system in this conditions, if you win you get between $5(roll 2) and $175(roll 11) but since its more probable that you win in the earlier rolls your expected win is of $14,30 each time you start the system **IF U WIN**, on the chance that you lose you lose $1160 so the expected outcome of playing like this gets you a net loss of $0,97. Remember that the house always wins and in this kind of roulette they have a 2,7% edge in the 0
Math Nerds never win. Real people always win. You see it every day at every casino on every spin.
@@DrSchorBc their not dumb enough to play
@@DrSchor yuh, for every 1 person who wins, about 10 lose
Tip 1; make sure u got enough money to lose 11 times in a row. I had €400 lost a couple of times so ended up with €120. I did not had enough to do the 7th spin i think. From €120 I played with €1, instead of €5. Had 2 times that I’ve lost 10 times in a row, but won the 11th. Turned €120 in to €535 in 3 hours
tip 1. don't play.
1. tip don't play .. every time that you try in 1 hour happen that you ll find more than 11 in a row lost. It happens also 15 in a row.
Have enough money and table without limit so you can loose 37 times in a row.
Unless you have infinite money and the house has no limit you will always lose long term using any strategy.
Even then you only win by stopping when you happen to be ahead
what if you use many different strategies at once?
@@abashamzi4480 it doesnt change the odds, which are stacked against you in the long run.
@@abashamzi4480 You would not have the money to do that, you would also keep losing money. I done 1 to 35 thinking that it was fool proof way of winning, and then a losing bet I would double up. However, it is not idiot proof and I lost because you cannot double up on it and make the money back. You have to gamble to make a profit, so if you spend £50, you want to make at least £51. If you are spending £50 but winning £48 all the time doing multiple systems, then you are losing money and will go broke in the end.
@@Timlagor This only works if you actually stop for good. The odds don't care, if you play another round after you won or if you come back 2 weeks later to play again. In the long run you always loose.
This will be my first comment on UA-cam ever. Not really a gambler but I saw this video about 6 months ago and I’m leaving for the Air Force in 2 weeks and left my job but had $800 to mess around with. I treated it like a work shift and said I would do 8 hours in the casino with $5 units. I ended up staying 14 hours and profited $2500!! I went to $445 one time and was sweating profusely lol. So like a smart educated man I went back today and in 2 hours profited $740. I did leave early though because I had to bet $720(360 on 2 different machines) and my heart couldn’t take how nervous I was haha. Still I appreciate the $3220. I will play it two more times and then head off to the military.
Best of luck and thank you for your service !
Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. If you do keep playing this game you will find, rather quickly, that you are going to lose a lot of money at this game
Fact is, let's face it, you already have
Thank you for your service boss!
You changed my life, stick to the sequence and it'll all work out. Turned 40 into 160 onna $3 minimum double 00 table. Day one. I'll update tomorrow's run..payday is tomorrow
Turned 400 into 1800. Thank you good sir
The critical thinking skills are non existent here. Do you ACTUALLY believe that if any system like this worked, the casino would offer roulette??
25 into 722 onna electric table. $2 minimum. I'm alright with no critical thinking according to you. Just sharing my experience and how I played. I had no comfort as much as I do now. Just be patient and wait. It'll work or it won't. The sequence always comes back. Sometimes you might need a sh*t ton and at that point I've just said screw it and left. But i never start with more than 50. And I've went more often since my last comment. And I'm still positive off it. My personal rule is if 50 didn't make it, it just wasn't my day 🤷♂️
@@Sam24689 No, the strat will not work.
You proved that fact, didn't you??
Notice, the comments ceased 5 months ago..........
Just saying....
@@JasonCoffman-xu5ks
What's funny is you expect me to comment every win and everytime I gamble. It's been 5 months and you came here just to say sum negative
Realistically speaking you cannot win everytime. Most of the time I've gone and taken it slow, with proper bankroll and waiting, I come out profitable.
I said this system changed my life. And that is very true. Changed the way i look at roulette and the bet spread involved. I don't see why the excess negativity. It's like you waited 5 months just to hop on and text negativity.
If you cannot follow this simple system and make some money, then I understand why your so negative about other people winning.
PERSONALLY, I just wanted to win and wanted everyone here to win. The house, the casino, the 'big guy" wins most times. I always root for the small guys and girls. Not rich, not spoiled, gotta work hard. This is a good way to use some small bankroll for some nice traction
I did this for 3 days with only $200 deposited in each day. It worked really well the first two days, and I didn't need the full $1,160 for those two. My third day though, I was doing okay, got up $100 and then I got 8 losses in a row. I had to take the L because 1. I didn't have any more money to potentially lose, and 2. I didn't want to potentially lose more. I will continue to try this method once I have more I can lose though. So far, it is a very good system.
If it works you need to play all you can You will find out, rather quickly, that you are losing money at it. A lot of money
I'm no expert on UA-cam video's, but I've watched a few, and you're the first to add the factor of being patient. Wait for the table to miss a dozen 3-5 times and increase your odds without having to gamble any of your own money. Great video.
Thank you Ernest.
If there's any topics you're particularly interested in let me know and I'll try to get round to doing a video on them
The reason no one else includes that, is because its nonsense.
@@snotspat Thank you. Gambler's fallacy runs rampant in an insane amount of people. If winning was this easy everybody would do it, wake up!
that's my current strategy ...
You are going to make a profit most of the time, but it is a small profit compared to the big loss when you eventually do lose. Your betting strategy is kind of a slider so you can have incredibly high chances of making profits, but the higher the chances the smaller the profits and the bigger the eventual inevitable loss. Its still pretty cool though. And better to play roulette in a controlled manner to increase youre chances of not losing all your money, even if it reduces your max potential win 😅
or wait for a column that doesn't hit 8 in a row...This is pure insanity and I love it.
... correct. And one time I saw it go 10 times in a row.
25 times Ina a row
I did Fibonacci yesterday on a simulator. $5 on 1st and 3rd 12 and $5 on 2 columns (all placed at the same time). Always followed winning dozen and column. After 3 odds or even in a row (or black/red) I started Fibonacci. Ran it up to $1850 in simulator in about 100 rolls.
Wow that's pretty good going
Can you explain pls how I play this sistm
That doesn’t make any sense. You’re risking 4 to get 3. Occasionally you’ll get 6, but I’m not sure it evens out much less exceeds.
I saw this video then tried it on an electronic roulette game at Yonkers and made $250 in a couple hours starting with $200 out of pocket. I'll be trying again next time I go... What simulator do you use?
don;t be fooled by the simulator
Good system .... thanks for the video.
Limit the losing is one key to win.
When losing 7 straight, I prefer to STOP.
Go to the bar and have a coffee, enjoy then go home.
Tomorrow come again with the system.
Casinos don't like gamblers who have self controls, they like you to go hard and losing more.
They hate winners, and love losers.
I've been using this exact method, over the last month, online. The results have been MUCH better than I expected. Thank you so much for sharing this with us, God bless.
What do you do after a win? Do you keep betting or wait for "a couple losses" then bet again?
@@budman-tw6rr - I just keep betting. However, be careful staying on 1 dozen, or, column for to long. I was on the 2nd dozen one game and it missed the hitting the 2nd dozen for 19 spins in a row!!. Maybe, rotate to a new dozen, column after each bet?.
@@Patso65 yes indeed the law of averages would work if you bet columns BUT the odds deem you will ALWAYS lose eventually. Say you cover two columns of 12 (one chip same denomination on each column) - one comes in BUT the other loses you lose one gain one - so profit is one chip. BUT if the 1 column you havent bet on comes in you lose 2. So effectively you have to win twice to cover 1 loss using a 2* 12 column system. The reason you lose is because the odds are 2/1 BUT they should be 3/1
Are you still doing this method with success?
@@kingzt1212 Off and on, from time to time
No matter what combination of bets you place, you are just accelerating or delaying the inevitable... loosing. You won't beat the casino edge on the long run, unless you find a flaw on the roulette table. You may cashout with profits many times, but there is going to be that one time your bankroll goes to the gutter. So play for the fun of it and manage your money to bet only what you are ok to loose.
shhhh. Dont give the secret strategy which is....dont play with that game.
@@0its0not0mine my country, the one which put men on the moon, is currently a scandal among the nations as to maths and physics ability., especially among young folks. The comments under this vid well demo that fact
I be found the one rational person in these comments!!! Precious!!!
My nation, the one which put men on the moon, is currently a scandal among the world's nations as for maths ability among the young. You can see this in these lame comments
Made 1200 yesterday at ballys from this strategy. Averaged $170 per hour profit on the video terminal roulette machine which is faster than table. While I was chasing the second column for 10th spin I hit it and then noticed third column hadn’t come out of 6 times so for next bet I went with third column thinking I got 6 free rides and hit it on the 9th spin which means it can go up to 15 times too. Got lucky this time.
Tried this yesterday at the casino, on the hybrid roulette game machines. Started with $200 bankroll, finished with $551 in a couple hours. $351 profit 🎉🎄
I did have a run of 8 misses in a row 🥵 but stayed disciplined and won.
Love that! Thank goodness the 9th came in.
It's scary but it has the most reward
Worked pretty well on the Simulator. I tested it with real Money , lost everything in the 8. Round , Crazy
Ahh that sucks, it can get a bit intense.
What units were you playing?
Hahahahahahhahahaa it’s crazy isn’t 😂😂
@@CasinoMatchmaker 2€ per unit
haha me and my buddy came up with this strategy when we were in early 20s (back in 2008). We always waited for 6 minimum times that our numbers didnt hit in a row, before starting our bets. After about a 12 hour day, we finally lost it all with 14 losses, +6 = 20 in a row the numbers didnt hit. We had fun drinking the entire day though and testing our strategy out.
the waiting of 6 times actually meant nothing at all as to what was going to happen. The universe didn't know you wanted those 6 times. The gods of roulette weren't going to reward you for doing that
Iv bin doing this for years I play everyday with the intention of winning $100 it can get boring at times but if your trying the basically print money at the casino this is the way to do it but I do recommend for people that don’t have a lot of money to lose stop if you lose 7 in a row
Online Betting Anytime, Anywhere
100% Real Earning With "My-booki"
tinyurl.com/2s35chbe
fast-paced world of online betting, finding a platform that not only offers endless possibilities but also upholds the values of ethical gaming can be a challenge
#MyBooki
I modified the system for baccarat or even money bets. On a win, I repeat the bet. If it wins, restart the series. If it loses, repeat the bet without advancing the level because the last two bets cancelled each other out. That gives more than 11 tries to hit two in a row.
Your odds of losing are over 2000:1 and if you lose your lose only 273 units. So far ;playing baccarat I won over 30 shoes straight without losing any. I also play three hits per shoe, so that's over 90 hits. THANK YOU.🤩🤩
I have tested this out on a simulator. I had one streak of 15 losses of a single column 1 time in 1000 spins. I also add a 0/00 split bet and increase by $1 with each spin during a column bet. Results + $699 for a thousand spins. I would recommend 8 losses before starting a column bet
lol, you guys are hilarious! I take it you both quit your jobs? If not, why didn't you?
Fibonacci System on even chance bets works, but it’s not how you described in the video. Starting at 1 unit, you go once up the sequence with every loss, and twice back down with every win. This is because with every win, you’ve made exactly as much back as your last 2 losses. It’s the beauty of Fibonacci. Perfect symmetry. Every time you get back to 0 on the sequence, you’ll have made 1 unit. It doesn’t pay out as spectacularly as a 2:1 bet, but it keeps you at the table longer.
But if you lose 4 bets in a row following the fib sequence... Then you're guaranteed to be a loser as the next bet won't recover your 4 losses (Only your last 2)
@@CasinoMatchmaker Right, you move 2 steps back towards the beginning. The risk is never so high that you can win it all back with one bet. So if you lose 4 bets (1,1,2,3) and win your 5th bet (5), you move 2 steps to the left, and bet 2 units again. You’ll have made back the last 2 bets (2+3). Continue the chain.
Tried this with 20 cents and end up with a €7.20 profit in 50 minutes. Loved it. 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.40 - 0.60 - 1.00 - 1.60 - 2.60 - 4.20 - 6.80 - 11.00 - 17.80 - 29.80 ( and the max is €5000 at my table for dozens ) Also increased my chance by waiting for numbers not played for 3/4 times in a row. I can't see losing money long term to this strategy.
Thank you for the video.
While some mathematical genius may pound you with the "Gamblers fallacy" and "the game has no memory", they clearly forgot the true nature of Roulette(I mean the humanly tossed ones, not those electronical or computer screen ones) is not pure mathematic nor statistic. By that I mean is that the spinner start their next spin base on the result of the previous spin. They usually have a SOP of picks up the ball, and after counter spins the roulette for so many seconds, then they toss the ball to either direction or the spinner have a tendency of selecting where they feel like to start their spin. As result, the next spin is pretty much related to the previous, (if the spinner does not have a specific idea in mind,) provided the spinner uses the same strength (which most of the time, they do, especially when it is a seasoned spinner) and tossing the same direction.
So the spin result is actually pretty much humanly controlled and with enough practice, the dealer (spinner) can almost hit the same number when they use the same strength, starting point, with the roulette spinning the same direction and they also tossing the same direction as the previous. And obviously when they feel like, they can just randomly toss it and the result will be a random result
Good thing is that what you suggested are very small bet amounts, and usually the spinner will not try to catch those bets, but rather the big ones on the numbers.
So your theory will work, provided that you did study the spinner a bit, and make sure you don't bet on the neighbour blocks of numbers that the spinner "dislike"
Amazing, you clearly know your stuff.
I've also made a video on dealer bias and how you can sometimes predict where the ball will land
I tried this after watching the video. I did see a 10 losing streak so still kinda scary haha but it works!
It works and doesn't work. Table limits will result in this failing. I like this system better.
This is the only way I actually play the fib sequence. I call it the pure degen negative/positive progression system. You do 3 bets on 1:1 odds. Red, small, odd. 3 of the ones that can win together. You play this bets with martingale system until they all win, you remove each bet after a win. Then you take you 3 unit bet plus the 3 unit winnings and move it all to one of the dozens. Then you do a fib sequence on this until a win happens.
After this happens. You cover 12 splits on the board regardless of the wins. You can take all the profits and stack the splits a lot if you want. Your choice. The splits will be covering 24 numbers. Now just spam this until you lose. Then martingale it until you win again after the first lose. Then reset and start over.
You will be up anywhere from 25 units to 300 units depend on lucky or bad luck during the fib sequence. Bad luck is a early win, good luck win on spin 3-4. This is a negative/positive progression system. It plays every system and rules to all the systems. While giving you more and more casino bank roll to push with.
I loss in 15 row
you can easily stretch that by doing simple calculations to get more moves. Plus give your self a head start meaning you wait for certain number of losses without betting and when you feel comfy enough you start. I have seen both column and a dozen skip max 27 times, its rare but it does happen so consider this when building your strategy.
so when do you know when you are comfy. and how do you consider that when building your strategy. thats what we want to know. what is your secret?
I just tested it while listening to the video and profited $20(using $1 bets instead of $5) in 2mins37seconds, now this was a very very short sample and I obviously have only tested it once but it worked for me so you sir get a like and sub
Thank you sir.
Like you said, it won't win every single time, but it wins often and can be good fun to play
Tryed it, i know u dont wanna hear it, but those 1 in 555 are coming for u if u sit on this tactic. Its my 3rd day playin by these rules, and even after waiting 5 numbers in a row, 2to1 i was aiming for came after 17 rows. I know this is some unpopular opinion, im just sayin its still possible and sooner or latter, those 1 in 555 aint that rare :)
I also prefer dozen / column betting to even chance bets. But I recommend “to go with the wheel” and not stick to the dozen / column that is not appearing for a long time. Bet on what is showing up more often for the moment (works with numbers as well).
So I tested this on a demo of an online roulette game and showed it seemed to work well…I took the plunge and deposited a little cash…playing baby stakes (10p lol)…so far I’m £45 UP!!!! How the heck has that happened with 10p stakes!?
I’m using second column all the time, not changing it…I don’t know how it works but it works…sometimes I will have a high bet but it always comes back around…
Finally found something that works for me!
What is the name of your roulette game pls ?
no it doesn't work
I tried it. Four runs. 1st time - I hit a few singles at the beginning then 10 straight losers, 2nd time - doubled up, 3rd time - wiped out faster than the first time, 4th - another wipeout a little bit slower than the other 2.
Oh man thats super unlucky
Best method I’ve tried won 500 so far. Don’t lose hope when it comes to 7 or 8 spins with out a win because the numbers are in your favour
I did this simulation in Excel where I drew 100k rounds, and then drew 100k random guesses considering always betting on 2 columns. I got some martingales of 11,14 and even 15x. This becomes unfeasible even starting with a minimum bet.
Online Betting Anytime, Anywhere
100% Real Earning With "My-booki"
tinyurl.com/2s35chbe
fast-paced world of online betting, finding a platform that not only offers endless possibilities but also upholds the values of ethical gaming can be a challenge
#MyBooki
4th day (8hrs total) with fresh deck studios at Wild casino (online) and i saw the bottom column miss 19x and hit on the 20th ,, within the 20 spins there were 3 green 0 hits and two double number hits , it was insanity ... to be safe with 12's or columns you would need a 6 - 7 trigger and a 15 progression ,, and even then anything is possible but just pray you get to x3 your bankroll before you bust ... and the problem is with a 7 trigger you're only playing maybe 8 times an hr and probably only making 100hr (which is ok but going to take you quite some time to get you to 3x your bust amount)
@@James_Ford4815 exactly!
@@James_Ford4815 Depends. If its a real wheel with not bet interface otherwise it'll get front ran by payback rates. Am in vegas. Tried dimes on video american roulette. Took the L early in my progression to test runs and lost $500 due to due to multiple 50+ streak anytime I got more than 10% up. Played on a 10$ minimum table and smoked it making back 3x what I lost and then some without ever seeing the back half of the progression.
yeah, system massively understates probability of loss and the actual likely size of wins. you're actually rooting for that 11th bet winner, but kinda screwed if it goes over or winning earlier in the sequence.
Used this strategy on a 0 00 machine in las vegas. Doubled my bankroll and then increased my base bet. Was feeling pretty good and all the sudden some gangster looking guy whistled nearby and i lost 12 or 13 in a row. Across from my machine there was also a sketchy hooker lady not playing the machine. Not sure if i was paranoid or just had some bad luck...
Casino thugs. Had them work on me. Spill drinks, try to start a fight out of the blue. Working for the casino.
Balls don't have memories. I love betting doz/col. 2:1 odds ain't bad. I wait for 9 misses before betting and gone up to 23 misses before stopping (it hit at 26 spins)!
A system I have yet to try is to sit one day at your fav wheel and mark when each miss stops. Then calculate when Most of the misses stop. Second determine (based on your base bet amount )how many misses you can go to recoup that loss in say 3 wins. That will determine when you will stop. Example: You decide that most misses end at 7. You start betting at 6 misses. But unlike most bets you don't win at 7 misses. Instead you go up to 10misses and still not win. If you had previously decided that 10 misses was your max you would stop and take your loss Instead of riding the misses all the way to say 16 or 20 misses till you either 1) ran out of $$$ or 2) hit the max bet size
I think I will try this out tomorrow when I go to YAMAVA in Southern California. If I do I will let you know my results 😊
Wish me luck, it couldn't hurt🤗
The house will always have the advantage henceforth why the lights still shine in Vegas but this is interesting strategy for the game. I've simulated this with $500 bank roll several times with great success when you set your winning line and walk away when you hit it.....Boarding plane for Aruba to test it on a real table....will follow up!
I had a go of this. I waited 6 spins and then I started the system. I bet a further 8 times, that's a run of 14 spins and then I stopped, it took a further 9 spins before it hit the column. That's a run of 23 spins.
Me, too. 23 losses.
Much worse in video/etg. IGT use unity games which is notoriously bad for modeling probability. I played some dimes and reset my sequence midway for longer runs. Have seen multiple 30+ streaks on those pieces of shit. Definitely play this on a real table with two instances, one hot one cold.
@@r.a.6382 better play on live table, but also saw the cold dozen like 11-13 spins before.
@User - I saw your post and basically dismissed it. A few days later I got caught in a run of twenty spins before hitting first dozen. Not saying I didn't believe you, but now I emphatically believe you.
The maths never change. I checked out the number of times the sixth was a win or loose after 5 losses and it was exactly the same as after 1 loss or even no loss.
I love your statistics and get what you are driving at. I still get stuck on the fact that each number on the wheel has the same odds of hitting each time the marble drops, no matter what happened previously. I Enjoy your channel, many thanks 👍
Thanks for the feedback Chadd.
You are right that each spin has the same odds of winning/losing.
But by following the sequence until the end you are betting that you won't lose 11 bets in a row.
The probability of losing a dozen/column bet 11 times in a row is 98.7%
Hope that clarifies the math.
@@CasinoMatchmaker It's bullshit math! You can only multiply to the power of 11 if there is any relation between all spins. In roulette the probability of the outcome of a spin is never related to the previous spin and therefor you can not calculate any winning or losing streak. The fact that many people think you can (made possible by this kind of fake math videos) is a big win for the casino's.
@@fritztweemeter8746it’s true, but future odds are calculable, and cannot be influenced by past results. If you bet, ahead of time, that it will come up red 10 times in a row, your odds are .475^10. That’s real, and valid probabilities. The reverse is also true though, betting that red will NOT come up in the future 10x in a row is .526^10. Also good and true. Whether it’s a good bet or not depends on the payout odds. The casino always has payout odds beneficial to them. They don’t care if any one player wins or loses, over time they get their money from the math.
What makes those valid bets is that they ARE connected. They must occur consecutively to win.
But, if you spin red 9 times and THEN bet the 11th will be red, the probability is no longer .475^10, they’re only .475. So you will not get paid commensurate odds for .457^10.
The bit in this video about waiting x spins for a pattern do not affect your probability or odds.
If you look at it as betting that you will not lose your bankroll in whatever number of spins your system dictates, then it’s good math. But it’s not good math to think any previous spins have anything to do with it.
You are not thinking outside the box believing every spin has the same chance equally a number comes up....a very simple to maths...or ask if you are lazy to chatgpt...
What is the chances that every single numbers comes up on a European wheel in 37 spins...so based on this i can say never, in another word within 37 spins it will be either repeater/s...or neighbor/s...study the wheel and you will find it does has a pattern but you just need to find it
@@CasinoMatchmaker😂❤
12:26 Probably the grossest misuse of statistics leading to the worst gambling advice ever 😂 👏 👏 👏 😂 amazing stuff.
good old gamblers fallacy
LOL, It's a 36/1 chance to hit any number every time you bet. There is no sequence LOL
is this because each spin is independent? But surely the number is due if you wait for 5 blanks before betting
Agreed haha each spin is independent and still a 68% to lose on the 16th spin regardless if you lost on the prev 15 spins.
@@hotstepper887 37:1 or 38:1 because of the 0 and 00 on the wheel.
Yes, those reload bonuses can be a lifesaver, especially when you hit a rough patch. Helps to keep playing without breaking the bank
I work of 5 different tables (all online, virtual and live)) over 3 different sites (cryptocurrency) take £5;at each table. This is £75 a day with a bankroll of 300 which never goes. Even if you lose the bankroll at one site, you won't at another or it's very unlikely. The house roulette cannot catch up because the bets are so small that the likelihood off 11 straight is so so small. Yes the house does have a chance, but only if you remain at the same table. Be disciplined, not greedy.
I tried this system today betting with £s. I scaled down from a start point of 5 to 1. So my stakes were 1,1,2,3.5,8,13,21,34. I played for an hour,with a 15min bathroom break in between. I made £50 profit never staking more than £8. I have just finished playing for 90mins and made a further £80 profit,top stake being £13,which I placed once. I only stopped as I was getting a bit bored.I used the bottom row of numbers
That's awesome mate.
What casino do you play at?
@@CasinoMatchmaker William Hill,which is a live casino. Just tried same with Bet365 and won another £50 max stake £5. I am going to Malta next week for a holiday and may well go to the casino there and try the system out,with real chips
@@3999MILESwhat's your bank roll for £1 units?
@@CasinoMatchmaker Yeah, he wants to direct you to a casino affiliated to his business, because you playing elsewhere makes him zero money. And while we are here, why would he provide a trick that makes casinos lose money when this is how he makes profits ?
This is bulletproof when you add the discipline with it
Paying attention in your high school maths and statistics glasses would have been more bulletproof
Casinos LOVE all of these strats, simply because none of them can work, no matter how disciplined you might be
@@JasonCoffman-xu5ks LMAO EXACTLY ! With a 5% house edge in the game the translation is the more you play the more you will go down the path of losing. There is NO BET in roulette where the house does not have edge at ALL times. And by the way 5% assumes the game is played to its maximum effecient which most people come no where near.. Roulette system are for the Mathematically Challenged plain and simple !
@@alivstyson1864 the casino empire thrives on the irrational. the low iq, and the mathematically illiterate
I used to do something similar and made a lot of dollars , I didn’t know it had a name , it was something I calculated on my own , the challenge was I started much higher and sure enough I lost a lot with incredibly bad streaks , waiting for 5 non hits may take a long long time , I am not one of those patient players !
If you were actually capable of "calculating", you would have known this couldnt work going in
Casinos make theor billions off of people who are incapable at basic maths, and rational thinking.
@@JasonCoffman-xu5ks😂have you heard of gambler’s fallacy ! I agree with you actually, although not to blow my horn , but I am more than capable of doing basic math and rational thinking on most occasions
@@Thenobelfan but just not this occasion???
Anything is possible in roulette…no matter how much you want to believe there is some sort of pattern or strategy you can follow, the game will burn you. I like to bet dozens, and I used a strategy where’d I’d start a progression on a dozen that hasn’t hit in 5 times in a row. The amount of times I’ve seen it go 20+ times without hitting is incredible. It’s like the game knows, and it says watch this lol! It doesn’t happen a lot but it only takes that one time to wipe you out.
Heres one of my strategies...
Wait 3 to 5 spins like you said for a first or 3rd column. Well yse 3rd column for example
Once that happens bet one unit on 19 to 36
If that loses bet on last third
If that loses bet one unit on last third qnd 19 to 36 if 19-24 hit you br3ak even rebet. If i lose i either go into the system you have or some times just pick one line in that third. That way you have potentialy dozens of chances for thoae 6 numbers to hit for profit before busting out
I played this strategy this past Saturday and turned my $1200 into more than $4000 in about 2 hours. I had to bet $445 two times winning that 11th bet twice.
I played on a digital roulette table in the casino with $1 minimum and $3000 maximum. My betting values were 5, 5, 10, 15, 25, 40, 65, 105, 170, 275, 445.
Since the table I played on had a higher maximum than I was expecting I plan to increase my bankroll to extend the number of losses needed to lose it all.
Good luck everyone.
sure you did......
I know of a ETG in Las Vegas that has a middle row limit total maximum bet of $3,000.00 so if you have a very long loosing streak it is possible to still win yours very last bet. Unfortunately it is a American wheel but even so, it would allow you to loose 14 times before you are out of money. Possibly? Yes. Likely to happen? No. It is a very good chance you will win by your last bet.
Lol u r an 1diot hahaha you can go 30 round of loosing past events dont impact the future 😂
Hats Off Tuitor,,,,, One of the best explanations I have ever seen in a Channel, after this i am your regular subscriber....thanks alot!!!
Not being a baller myself , i tried it at minimum of 1, ( ex 1,1,2,3, etc,) and did manage to leave with profits. I did it twice, walked in with $150 and left at 500 both times. Also its small bets so takes some time, i was there for about 1 1/2 hrs each time. but yes you need to have enought money to loose a couple and keep betting,
It's easier to hit 10 losses in a row than you might think. I was in Ceasars the other day and they have 3 roulette tables going. I took a picture of them then went and played some slots coming back and taking a total of 8 pics of the numbers hit boards. 22 spins showing per board. On 6 of the boards the 2 column lost a whopping 8 times, 7 times, 6 times, 7 times 6 times and 5 times in a row. on 1 board the 1st column lost 8 times in a row. and on 1 board the 3rd column lost 7 times. If you played that day and had the misfortune of picking the 2nd column you would have had to have a bank of $1,320 at a $15 min table to win around $200. Granted if you played the right column you'd win a lot but um it still boils down to gambling folks and you have a 1 in 3 chance of losing big $$$ using this system if you pick the unlucky column.
I do a double Fibonacci system, I bet on 1st and 3rd 12, it’s a little more tricky to keep track of, but I have made good money doing this system.
Can you explain the system pls?
@@hadistocktrader7819 as he said, he uses the fibonacci on 2 separate dozens. in other words, playing the above strategy on 2 dozens instead of just 1 dozen. this requires twice the bankroll of playing just 1 dozen.
If the math works, then why not bet on all three rows?
you could do six simultaneous bets. all dozens and all columns. use the roulette card that casinos provide to help keep track of your bets. unless you are waiting for 5 skips. but if you play just one bet, look at every single dozen and column while you wait
Brooo same, plus 2 numbers, I make like 150-300 a day at the moment
I got on an online live roulette table with minimum of 0,10. I had a bankroll of 60,90 that way i could lose 13 times in a row, it was a very slow strategy but in 3 hours I doubled my money. So if you like to play slow and win money even if it is small amounts, this is a very good strategy!
could please say the name of the website you used? :)
i already lose 15 times in a row, so another bad system
I just did a simulation with a live online casino. Testing how this would work over 100 spins, in fact it was 104 spins to stop at a winner. It showed 149pts profit. Biggest losing run was eight and there were two losing runs of seven. I used the first street (1 - 34). I noticed that the 1st 12 also ran up a series of eight losers before one came in. I think theres some mileage in this system, thanks a lot for the video.
Thanks Andy.
I tested this system on a simulator. it took 25 min to double 100$. I guess it works pretty well. Highest loss was at the 9th spin, but it also gives you the best profit
Nicely done!
Yea you're right, it's almost like you're rewarded for being brave and sticking with it, despite the bets getting bigger and bigger
Try it for longer. You'll lose your bankroll.
How very naive
The elementary schools are failing to teach people maths,, and the ability to reason
thing is, if the chance is 30%, even after the 100th game its still same chance. unfortunately this is how the game gets you. I know this from experience when you think a number wont bust, it will and has. you think it wont be possible to lose with this strat 30x in a row? you probably never lost 30 times at 50%, dont be fooled lol
I’ve done the system with $1 , $10, $100. Love the system but when it fails the pockets def feel it.
Absolutely it's a painful one when it doesn't land
That’s a great idea! Betting is always more fun with friends around, and those bonuses for referring them seem pretty generous.
Love this system... going to be my go to now. I like to play 30 minutes and then bolt! +400 tonight starting with $5
Play on!!! All you will demo is that you cannot reduce the house edge with a strat.
Btw, this strat is as old as time itself. Even has a well-known name.. It doesn't work
Just lost $232 doing this system. I saw that 2nd 12 hasn't hit in 6 spins, so I placed $1 on it. Lost 11 times in a row from there. Glad to hear lots of others found luck, wish I could find it.
Sorry to hear that man
Sometimes it’s better to bet on the columns winning than the one that is losing
@@eli5370 yes if you know the future ahaha. this method don't works!!
FYI i hjappened to see 18 straight donks on 2nd column so yeah, walk out when your`re ahead
You do realize each spin is independent of any other spin
It's better to wait until a column or a dozen doesn't show up like 7 times or more... cause I've seen it happened up to 20 times with out showing
7 times is better but it might take a while
I do this but only wait till 5
Sorry just finished the video 🤣🤣🤣 this works nearly every time I play. I do 5 loss stop, $100 units. $1200 max loss, 2k profit n I’m off the table
Thats just gamblers fallacy, each spin is independant, doesn't matter if a column doesn't show up 7 times in a row, on the next spin its got the same exact probability of not showing up again.
@@sportspriceanalysis416 Agreed. It's like saying a customer who has been watching the spins after 7 consecutive reds and then decides to back black has an advantage over a newcomer who is unaware of the spin history and bets red. They both have the same chance of winning
Watched twice in same session recently, a dozen losing 25 times. Should probably play the follow the leader, or hottest dozen/column.
It is the law of diminishing averages, which actually does not exist...lol. However, after watching several roulette videos (I had not seen this one yet) I ended up doing almost exactly this system. The only difference is that I would wait until 7 misses before betting, and it would be any 2-1 that had not hit in 7. Being an electronic roulette where you pick your game, AND it also having a 000, I would stake $500, walk away when I was over $100. I did this several times. I got wiped out once, and ended up walking away with $435. Your video is spot on, but you gotta have the guts to stick it out.
Absolutely, the cashback saved me last week. It’s a good feeling to get something back after a loss
I rolled for exactly 100 spins on the simulator using the sequence faithfully. My bet was always on middle column. I finished up $355.
There was never any danger. The highest I had to go in the sequence was $65.
This is the greatest Roulette system I have ever tried, and I have tried a ton. I can imagine adding the extra step of waiting for 2 or three in a row not hitting before betting would make it even safer.
Yeah wait until you get to the end, and it will happen, 98.7% just means you will keep playing until that 1.3% catches you.
@@JohnDoe-vc7bwyeah i got up to step 13 on this. It was doing well but then middle didn't show for 17 spins
@@JohnDoe-vc7bw I ran a second run on the simulator using first Dozen this time. After 102 spins I was up $500 and cashed out. Obviously any system run for long periods of time will eventually lose, but the point is, this system is very safe overall and as long as you cash out early and don't run for a long time you can come out ahead. I would never sit there for 100 spins in real life. Since my starting bet is only $5 I would be happy to leave with $50 which is 10 times my starting bet. Remember, in all gambling, greed is what kills you, not the casino.
@@stevem9529 That's insane. The odds of that happening are like 0.13%. But people need to realize odds are usually used with large numbers, so things that seem rare can happen if you just do it a few times.
But yeah past 17 I go past my casino's limit if I am starting with $1.
What's crazy is how with this method, the longer you go, the more you make. So initially you just win $2 if you hit immediately. But if you win at 17, you win $611. Of course, you lose $4180 if you lose 17 in a row.
@@JohnDoe-vc7bw Yep that's how it always is. It's like you may as well take your life savings, and only bet ONCE. Put it all on 35 of the 37 spaces. With 94.5% odds of winning. So like $1M, you win $28,000. Then never bet again.
Casinos aren't dumb, they know these systems. They set the maximums to make sure the odds are always in their favor. Without maximums and having infinite money, you could never lose at roulette.
Seems like a good system you have to be patient but for me I play the straight up split and corners bigger pay puts gambling is luck and timing and having a gut feeling as much as using any system my biggest win on roulette was 5k pounds from 500 pounds I hit 20 my favourite number 3 times on the bounce increasing the bet each time and cashed for 5k 4.5k profit also won 2.5k and 2k a few times just by being patient and using my instincts to when I think the ball will hit my numbers it works for 8 times out of 10 in last 30 years so I stick to it.
I tried this method and it works but I got 2 times no hitting for 11 consecutive times so luckily I have enough money to hit 12th time and than it hit with massive profit, so make sure to have enough money for 12th time also
That's the key, have a good backup
@@Simon-jh5bu literally cheat code, can they ban you for doing this?
That sounds like a good plan. I spread my bonus across a few casino games, tried a bit of roulette and blackjack
Those was the best video on following a system for playing roulette I've seen for many years. Well explained, well presented and backed up with math explanations and examples that made the video exciting to watch to the end.
Thank you very much, that's really appreciated
The maths was voodoo maths. Yes, one can do some simple maths to calc the chances of breaking a progression, and you did that. But rest assured the progression will break at some point. So what happens is that you very often win small, and very seldom lose huge, wiping out all those small gains, and more.
There is no strat which will erase or even diminish the rather large house edge on this game.
Yes, in the vid he presents calculations, but he also refused to do complete calculations which would have shown the truth
Started off really well, just keeping to the £1 min start point. Would leave at least 4 before starting to bet. Doing ok, then wiped out with an 18 spin losing streak. Not sure what the odds are of 18 spins without winning! So, this is certainly not perfect strategy as one huge loss wipes out all profit and bankroll!
Jheeze 18 losers in a row is tough.
Absolutely not a perfect strategy, those rare losing streaks can cause wipeouts
Same here today. Went from 116 euros to 340. Then i did switch to 232 and lost all.....
why do you think table not rigged?
Just tested this system online and it does surprisingly work. Only once did I run up to 8 losses in a row but won on the 9th spin. Otherwise it was usually within 6
9th spin would have been scary, but it does pay the highest profit
@@CasinoMatchmaker Just ran it again and took the balance from 2k to 10,370. Not bad in an online demo but scary to try at a live table. I'll need to run it on a few different ones online and then go live at the casino on the $5 min.
@@MikeGervasi Don't. It's not real. You can't beat the basic math parameters, no matter how you twist your betting pattern. This idiot is trying to lure people to his gambling website with his videos, there is no other purpose.
Just as a follow up. Seems the online system (for real money) at first was playing normally. I took $500 up to $3000 within 15 mins. Came back a bit later and the system SEEMED to have adjusted to my play and I lost it all. I gave up gambling after that and haven't played since. The system/game is rigged against you.
Any idea for the EV/expected value for this? I calculated it to be negative but my maths is bad so I want to hear from others.
Idk if it makes any difference but i calculated for a 00 inclusive table
It is negative EV
thank god someone is finally talking some sense. EV is the way to look at any betting situation. The EV is negative and will always be negative when the payout is less than the odds ratio. To break even on a 2:1 you would need to hit 1 out of 3 times, or (12 out of 36 times) You can't hit 12 out of 36 times when a "0" or "00" is on the wheel, There are now 37 or 38 numbers on the wheel and that's what gives the house an advantage and gives you a negative EV
I used this tonight playing online live roulette and more than doubled my bankroll.
I played starting with 10c plays and gave myself 11 chances to play which maxed my final bet at 8.90.
I started with 23.20 and ended up with 48.50 before walking away which took 2 hours.
3 times I ended up on my max bet which wasn't fun.
I would most times bet in 3rds which hadn't landed in 3 spins, sometimes 4.
If you're playing low this is fine but I wouldn't like the feeling of playing higher stakes as I seen quickly you can almost lose everything.
Used this system and went 18 bullets deep. Heads up y’all the wheel has no mercy. I turned 5.5k into 15k in 20 min but lost it all going 18 Bullets deep. It’s great when it’s hitting and only going 5-8 loses then hitting your number to reset but when the wheel starts doing what it wants hard to wager a $8900 ball but sometimes I guess you gotta have the nuts to spin the ball. 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️ good system if your bankroll is 25k and up
Holy smokes what is your starting bet for that to happen?
I was using this strategy for few days, till today it screwed me over. Didn't hit the 3rd dozen for straight 22 times. and another time straight 17 times. lost my buy in and more hahahaha. Just be careful guys. When the odds not on ur side then it's not. It's a good strategy but there's the 1% of time u lose it.
That's exactly it.
It can be really good but when you hit that bad losing streak it stings like crazy
Did you played online?
While this system can work in the short term for some small profits, it is still a negative EV betting system. I calculated the EV to be about -1.63.
As always the odds will be in the casino's favor, and any short term gains you make should not be seen as a way to best the system.
Even at .10 cents if you lose 11 in a row the lose is $26.40
Micro stakes
@@ToughVatodoesn't matter increase the stakes, increase the loss simple as.
Put your faith in probability, never possibility. Sit out strategies like this work great for online live tables
Excellent video and explanation!
Could you also add the probability outcomes for a 0,00 roulette table as they are more common in Canada. Thank you!
Thanks Jordan.
Are you playing online? You can easily find tables with single zero which I would highly recommend.
Playing a double zero wheel your chances of losing increase to 68.4% each spin
@@CasinoMatchmakerno, I’m not playing online. Have you had success with this strategy? If so, what online sites are you using?
It is 1 in 66 times
Excellent video explanation
The probability that the longest losing streak is 11 equals 1.3%, ...AS LONG AS YOU PLAY 11 TIMES ONLY. If you increase the number of rolls in the sequence, that probability will progressively increase, and sooner or later, you will encounter a longer streak. For example, in a sequence of 100 rolls, the probability of encountering a losing streak greater than 11 is approximately 25%. This can be easily simulated using a spreadsheet. In summary, it seems like a reasonable method, but not as good as 99%. Be careful with your money, or even better, don't think you can play roulette for a living!
👍 there is still some brain in this comment section!
I do....if you stick to one table, yes, the probability increases. If you change tablets (online virtual and live) the probability keeps at bay....long enough to cover your bankroll. Once you cover your bankroll, withdraw. You can keep doing this. Ive been for over two years. (earning €500 a week for 1-2 hours a day)I'm disciplined and not greedy
@@centenarians72 it’s impossible to consistently win at roulette for the long term no matter what strategy you use except a limitless infinite martingale. I’d be very surprised if you managed to do what you claim (like win every day for two years) cause the math would be against you in the long run.
@@AjejeB if you play online roulette, over several tables, with small bets only taking small amounts, then you can. The house only has the edge if you stay at a table too long. It's about patience. Some virtual tablets have glitches that allow you to cover red n black. Do it several times and watch the pattern. Plus you only lose if you lose your bankroll. I haven't yet, and even if I lose my £300 bank roll, I've not lost it because I've been winning more....I'm happy
“Losing streak greater than 11 is ~25% “ what about you wait for 5 consecutive losses before you enter so this will make the system 16 losing streak >>> what’s the odds on that please ?
This system is just working perfect. But it is difficult to hold on the needed discipline.
If you ever gambled, you have seen winning big in minutes. After that trill it feels frustrating winning very small in 30-40 minutes.
But winning small is better than losing which we forget while playing
Yes i saw it lose 19 times the other day and drained me
Key is to cut it off
Find a penny table its way easier
Kral Türkçe açıklasana bana anlamadim
so after we win, we go back to 1 1 2 3 5 8? or keep moving up the ladder?
@@thade554you go back to starting unit
@@thade554 go back
I won $410 today after watching your video. Thank you.
Nice work!
@@CasinoMatchmaker I am finding though, The probability of a number in any one row not being hit 16 times in a row on an American roulette wheel (including 0 and 00) is 0.295%, which translates to odds of about 1 in 337.84.
for anyone watching this... take a first year probability statistics course or simply search up the definition of independant events... also bare in mind that the probability of taking the number of turns you would need to double your entry bet without hitting the required losing streak is just under 1/3
They aren't independent if we are following the sequence
After hit table max, couldn't you spread the additional (needed) risk amount on the individual numbers within the column, or dozen that your outside bet is on(?). I mean, obviously you hope don't doesn't come to that, but could be, a potential workaround? Say you need to risk 720 on next spin (from your example - after 11 losses)... each 2/1 odds bet,includes 12 individual numbers, so, bet 20 on each number (of the dozen you're playing) for a risk of 240, leaving you able to risk 460 on the outside bet
That's actually a very clever point.
Fingers crossed it doesn't come to that, but yes you could do that !
Thank it works 💷💷💷
the part at 12:00 is wrong, waiting for it to lose 5x in a row does not change the prob of anything odds are odds and reset each occurrence. Please don't put bad information into gamblers hands.
ofc it change the row odds (in Row)
Wanted to type the same, listen to this guy. A roulette wheel does not have any memory of past spins, past spins do not influence future outcomes. This is basic probability theory.
that's not what i said. Telling people its that much harder to lose is wrong. Sure the odds of x amount in a row is harder with 5 more occurrences but your odds to lose when starting on spin 5 are exactly the same. @@boudabousrami844
A roulette wheel definitely has a MEMORY!. I consistently win EVERY TIME! Because there are patterns. When you learn to recognize the patterns you cannot be beat!!!.
you are wrong...period