BISMARCK & THE HUSSARS - FIRST LEAKS - Update 2.41- War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 492

  • @TheEuropeanCanadian
    @TheEuropeanCanadian  Місяць тому +286

    It will be a glorious day when Poland is added to the game. The Hussars will ride again.

    • @tasman006
      @tasman006 Місяць тому +14

      Nah I think Poland could be a new separte nation just like in yer I'm not as big as a fan game WOT. They are not part of the commenwealth and would not fit in the British line up historically. The sub tech tree to it they could add Ukraine it would be great. Poland/Ukraine has had tanks ect since just before and during WW2 and with good research could be done. Yes there would be repeat veichles and tanks but Warthunder really need to address the clone veichles/Tanks from other nations easier to spade the more you get to give even more historical awsomeness to the game.
      And no way should Nth Korea go into the Chinese Tech tree. Hello what do you have there already the CCP and the Chinese Republic(Taiwan). So with Nth Korea there should be added Sth Korea simple easy lots of stuff to put with same old new but with different things on the vechles/tanks ect. I do not agree where you want to put these new veichles/tanks ect.

    • @adamregiel8044
      @adamregiel8044 Місяць тому +7

      I will drink whole night if this would happend, and im pole so im able to drink vodka with friends for hour.

    • @-.Springtrap.-
      @-.Springtrap.- Місяць тому +8

      THEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED!

    • @adamm2943
      @adamm2943 Місяць тому +1

      @@tasman006 Personally if they would just add Poland as subtree, it would fit britian perfectly gameplay wise, Britian has pretty poor lineup, not many vehicles especially at the same BR, Poland maybe would fix it a bit, if as seperate tree it would be better as sth like central europe slavic countries, combining hungary, czechia, slovakia,poland and more

    • @The_technic_Nuget
      @The_technic_Nuget Місяць тому +2

      I would personally prefer a czechoslovak sub tree more than Polish one but still better than nothing.

  • @cybernetic_crocodile8462
    @cybernetic_crocodile8462 Місяць тому +51

    If they really want to add Poland, then it should be put in the new tech tree with Czechoslovakia, Romania, and maybe even Yugoslavia. Then we would have enough unique vechicles to make it maybe smaller, but worthy tech tree.

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому +4

      Oh no bro, if you add Yugoslavia it’s gonna be a BIG TT

    • @KonradZ22
      @KonradZ22 Місяць тому +3

      Thats a good idea

    • @patrykb_
      @patrykb_ Місяць тому +8

      the tree could be called "Międzymorze"-"Intermarium" or Central Europe.

    • @Rud01f
      @Rud01f Місяць тому +2

      @@patrykb_ I believe they keep it to stand alone nations, but even then there are enough fan made Polish trees which would be less copy-paste than china

    • @KPSWZGII
      @KPSWZGII Місяць тому +2

      For the past 10 years on every video like this someone mentions that they should do a central European tech tree. But im rather afraid it would be one of the most powerful tech trees

  • @ha_ur_dead6675
    @ha_ur_dead6675 Місяць тому +231

    If the Bismarck come in, I’m definitely gonna charge at it with a swordfish with torpedos.

    • @kotenara10
      @kotenara10 Місяць тому +13

      The AA bots would smack you first you need 4 dudes to do it

    • @doughnut3508
      @doughnut3508 Місяць тому +3

      @@kotenara10its actually fairly easy to get a bomb off on a US BB. U just need the correct method. For me I almost always hit them when I go up and down like VVVV like that and I usually hit them doing that.
      Also the Swordfish is far too slow to travel 4 to get a torpedo/bomb off. And then all thats left for u is to NOT hit the Main belt

    • @SkunkdMonk
      @SkunkdMonk Місяць тому +2

      Give me an N-Class, so I take the Role of the ORP Piorun. Three Salvoes in Honor of Poland!

    • @TheSnailfeeder
      @TheSnailfeeder Місяць тому +3

      Nah, with a Polish destroyer

    • @VonEldrich
      @VonEldrich Місяць тому +1

      @@doughnut3508OP is making a reference to an actual event that happen to Bismark during WW2……..

  • @arthursoares2544
    @arthursoares2544 Місяць тому +131

    Sabaton be hitting hard in the next update

    • @adamregiel8044
      @adamregiel8044 Місяць тому

      @@arthursoares2544 Hell yeah

    • @Doom-rv4go
      @Doom-rv4go Місяць тому

      Harder then the dead men

    • @KoRbA2310
      @KoRbA2310 Місяць тому +4

      Bismarck and Winged Hussars will be playing on repeat

    • @Avtomat4774
      @Avtomat4774 Місяць тому +1

      Janissaries are you ready to die?

    • @adamregiel8044
      @adamregiel8044 Місяць тому +1

      @@Avtomat4774 We will seel our vengance eye for an eye

  • @charlieharris2864
    @charlieharris2864 Місяць тому +57

    you know if the bismarck actually comes to war thunder i'll be very happy, because that ship is one of the most famous ships the german navy ever operated, and plus since we have the hms hood, it will allow people to kind of maybe recreate that famous battle, between the hms hood and the bismarck, in fact when winston churchill was first told of the loss of the hood he was quoted ((there is nothing vital to the nation at this moment as the destruction of the bismarck, i do not care how you do it, you must sink the bismarck)).

  • @Pinscher0508
    @Pinscher0508 Місяць тому +26

    the picture of the SMS Yorck was taken 400 meters from where i live

    • @mangoTGG
      @mangoTGG Місяць тому +2

      bro doxxed himself🤕expect me in 20 minutes🤭

    • @Pinscher0508
      @Pinscher0508 Місяць тому

      @@mangoTGG where u at i‘m waiting

  • @CallmeRoth
    @CallmeRoth Місяць тому +22

    Isn't poland worthy of a full tech tree? Their history might lack some prowess but their modern military stands out dramatically on the EU stage.

    • @tsarfield5835
      @tsarfield5835 Місяць тому +6

      Poland isn't worth a full tech tree. A FULL tech tree.

    • @ryicee3569
      @ryicee3569 Місяць тому +5

      It can't be a full techtree by itself. I think they should make a Eastern european TT with Poland, Balkans/Yugoslavia, Ukraine, and Turkey.

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому +2

      Not sure if it would go through. But i think it’d work wonderfully if it was combined with like Yugoslavia or sum

    • @v1be2007
      @v1be2007 Місяць тому +2

      it will be a tech tree filled with not only polish vehicles, but it will also have a bunch of other nations vehicles like czechoslovakia, romania etc.

  • @Danny__608
    @Danny__608 Місяць тому +27

    13:56 there are a lot of ww2 vehicles for poland: early ww2: 7tp, 10tp, 14tp, tks, tkd, tks-d, armoured car wz.28, 29, 34 and more including imported, unfortunately for mid/late ww2 they are all "imported": Shermans, crommwels, churchills, crusader, challenger, stuarts, t-34s, is-2s, su/isu spgs, m16gmc, crusader aa mk II and also more. For cold war (7.0-9.0): Is-3, 2s1, T-54, T-55 and polish variants of these tanks, ZSU-57-2, ZSU-23-4, Sopel, Stalagmit SPAAs, AHS Krab (similar to vidar, but in tech tree - for premium AHS Krab prototype with other hull), BMP-1, BWP-40, BWO-40 and more...... And as said a lot of modern vechiles

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 Місяць тому +1

      it just shouldnt be and probably wont be added, its just copy paste

    • @Danny__608
      @Danny__608 Місяць тому +2

      @@datcheesecakeboi6745 Especially planes they are 90% copy-paste and some nit even in polish camo. Unfortunately

    • @uyu3410
      @uyu3410 Місяць тому

      shut up kiddo​@@datcheesecakeboi6745

    • @ops5161
      @ops5161 Місяць тому

      Seeing how they executed the Finnish and Hungarian sub-nations, Poland would be as equally disappointing as both of them.

    • @roomcayz
      @roomcayz Місяць тому +1

      Italy used to be a subtree of the German tech tree, and eventually they got their own tech tree, maybe the same will come for Poland and other subtrees like Finland, Duch, Romania, etc

  • @ThePunisher267
    @ThePunisher267 Місяць тому +4

    nobody gonna talk about that guy bringing a sturer emil to a 10.0 match? 3:04

    • @peppapig9833
      @peppapig9833 Місяць тому

      As soon as I read this comment, I’ve seen him get obliterated

  • @KraftCzenkoPL
    @KraftCzenkoPL Місяць тому +4

    Poland got many fun prototype vehicles from the cold war era and early 2000.

  • @megapet777
    @megapet777 Місяць тому +6

    We need United Korea tree for sure xD

  • @polishpepe239
    @polishpepe239 Місяць тому +5

    Poland could be mixed with yugoslavia and czechoslovakia

  • @Lead1121
    @Lead1121 Місяць тому +21

    Gonna need a RP increase overall if we gonna keep getting so many high end vehiclea

  • @patrykb_
    @patrykb_ Місяць тому +3

    Poland should be a separate tree, perhaps connected to Czechoslovakia, do you remember "Intermarium" - this Polish concept of an alliance of Central European countries was already before World War II

  • @DarkStalker09
    @DarkStalker09 Місяць тому +3

    Poland should only be added as an independent tree

  • @kylexu227
    @kylexu227 Місяць тому +1

    type 15 is a breath of fresh air imo. it's also the only chinese tank to use a bustle autoloader+blowout panels which i assume is where the PLA is heading towards in the NGMBT

  • @wallachia4797
    @wallachia4797 Місяць тому +7

    Very nice, it only took Gaijin like, a decade to add their first Romanian vehicle into the ground tree.

  • @Project_Warfare
    @Project_Warfare Місяць тому +3

    "Bismarck In Motion, King of the Ocean, HE was made to RULE the WAVES across the SEVEN SEAS!" - Sabaton (Bismarck)

  • @trebor797
    @trebor797 Місяць тому +2

    If the Bismarck is coming it simply gotta stay at 7.0 or max 7.3. Otherwise you allow Jet Bombers to enter the field like the Il-28 which will be broken af. So there are 3 solutions: First but rather bad one is Bismarck get 7.0 BR and then will just crush anything thats 6.0 or lower easy which cause huge imbalance. 2nd is that planes get a BR cap, so plane above certain BR like 7.0 are not allowed to be used in naval. Third: seperated BR for planes in naval. 3rd is imo the best solution looking at the future where people want all those missile destroyers (I dont want them) which would imo best be introduced by making a BR cut jumping them to like 9.0 so they will never face big battleships and then one can also introduce more and more jets without a problem as these modern vehicles are capable to defend against them. A vehicle like Bravy would imo suit way better there

  • @KMS_Bismarck_Ironblood
    @KMS_Bismarck_Ironblood Місяць тому +1

    *Slowly grins aiming at Hood with Sabaton blaring in the background*

  • @ONE_Gom
    @ONE_Gom Місяць тому +3

    The highlight of the video was the North Korean subtree, and the thumbnail was South Korean K-1 LOL

  • @S_i_a_n.
    @S_i_a_n. Місяць тому +47

    As a South Korean, it would be fun to have North Korean armoured vehicles in the game. However, it doesn't make sense that there are North Korea but not South Korea… Maybe South Korea can share a tech tree with Poland. Poland imported many tanks from South Korea.

    • @Johnson217
      @Johnson217 Місяць тому +11

      I could honestly see Gaijin adding a "United Korea tree" since they did the same thing with China and Taiwan. It would be pretty fun, but also obviously just as controversial. For the player it's probably better, since you'd have access to more vehicles in one tree.

    • @oz314
      @oz314 Місяць тому +12

      North Korea to China and South Korea to Japan would be fine imo.

    • @juneseokwoo6225
      @juneseokwoo6225 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@oz314 fine? you have no idea how s.koreans would react....

    • @S_i_a_n.
      @S_i_a_n. Місяць тому +1

      @oz314 Well, Korea has been illegally colonized by Japan in the past, oppressed and exploited. So, there is still a historical rejection. Of course, that doesn't mean that Koreans don't necessarily hate Japan, but there is no technical commonality between the two countries, and the issue you just mentioned can be quite controversial. It would be better to release North Korea-South Korea into the game together and make a unified Korea.
      +but many Korean love Japan's culture. Ex: anime, j-pop. Or vocaloid.
      Of course, I also like Japanese culture.

    • @einfachignorieren6156
      @einfachignorieren6156 Місяць тому

      ​@@juneseokwoo6225nibody should give a shit

  • @mettsenator6007
    @mettsenator6007 Місяць тому

    An AESA radar can scan incredibly quickly, letting the radar see everything at once. No waiting for the radar to scan an area of sky. I’m not sure if anything in war thunder can but AESA could be able to guide multiple SARH missiles at once.

  • @BugattiONE666
    @BugattiONE666 Місяць тому +45

    BISMARCK CANNOT BE ADDED without other first, Scharnhorst is allready so busted shes nearly as good as Kronstadt,
    We need Nagato, Nelson, Colorado, Dunkerque and Roma

    • @Boromas_1
      @Boromas_1 Місяць тому +5

      Scharnhorst seems to have been quietly nerfed, I've been getting my crew depleted alot aswell as being detonated.

    • @mlgrocket
      @mlgrocket Місяць тому +7

      @@Boromas_1 the ship itself wasn't nerfed, it's due to the massive buff HE got, as it melts the crews of all ships. scharn is still the strongest ship, and before the japanese 16 inch ships and whichever one was just added to america, forget, the only ship that could pen the scharn was the mississippi

    • @olleronn616
      @olleronn616 Місяць тому +1

      High tier naval right now is basically a long slog match and it ends with the team with the most Scharnhorst players winning. Bismarck will be a real nightmare to deal with on top of that

    • @Clap_
      @Clap_ Місяць тому +4

      Im shure all 6 naval players agree

    • @Mii_Oh_Nine
      @Mii_Oh_Nine Місяць тому +1

      Bruh Japan does NOT need another 16" ship, they're gonna be fine with what they already have for a LONG time

  • @Yugoslavz
    @Yugoslavz Місяць тому +2

    I see in the comments a lot of people want Yugoslavia and a lot of people don’t know about it and assume it’s “copy paste” yes Yugoslavia did have lend lease crafts but Yugoslavia and the successor states do have domestic designs from captured German to the hybrid Stuart tanks and even from the kingdom age, also for the rankV+ if you look up YugoImports they have tons of crazy designs you can see made mostly in Serbia, and the crazy car hybrids from the civil war like the zastava 750 with a m60 anti tank gun, don’t get me wrong I do believe Yugoslavia would need some help as a independent tree which is why I think Bulgaria can be a great sub-TT and for the 2 naval players, Yugoslavia had a decent navy from 1920 cruisers to Cold War missile boats like the Končar-class and much more including aircraft from Soko and ikarus making their own aircraft designs
    Edit: there is a lot I didn’t mention but it’s easy to look it up yourself if you wish too this is just a small gist

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому

      Ye bro. Tbh with all the talks about Poland, they should just combine Poland and Yugoslavia or sum

  • @Fergusius
    @Fergusius Місяць тому +38

    Add YUGOSLAVIA!!!

    • @fuzzymuffin8273
      @fuzzymuffin8273 Місяць тому

      what? who?
      where?

    • @user-wp5jr6wl8h
      @user-wp5jr6wl8h Місяць тому +1

      There is no yugoslavia

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer Місяць тому

      Shitty mig-29 with R-60Ms only no R-27 or R-73 💀

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому +1

      @@FutureGohanGlazerwhat is bro talking about? The MiG29B is capable of carrying r60mk, r73rdm2 r27RE1 and r27TE1 and unofficially the r77 as well

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому

      @Feegusius fr bro. And if they wanna add poland so much they should combine poland and yugoslavia

  • @OldinaryChimera
    @OldinaryChimera Місяць тому +1

    I can now watch the 10 hour loop of Sabaton Birsmark

  • @Konakiri581
    @Konakiri581 Місяць тому +2

    Bismarck was a good ship but it got sent on a suicide mission with no proper support. It would be best if you read about Operation Rheinübung.

  • @luzifershadres
    @luzifershadres Місяць тому +2

    Kriegsmarine after the Bismarck amoracked the Hood: "You know whats a great idea after making the Royal Navy angry enough to sent an massive amount of ships to hunt down 1 ship? Lets make that ship face them without any support!"

  • @commandershortsight
    @commandershortsight Місяць тому +5

    We’re so back Swordfish bros

  • @edim108
    @edim108 Місяць тому

    imo it'd make the most sense to have Polish sub tree in the British one. The most widely produced Polish tanks, TK-3, TKS and 7TP were based on British vehicles.
    Polish tankers fought on Cromwells, Churchills, Shermans and Stewarts. Polish pilots flew in Hurricanes and Spitfires. Polish sailors served on British-made destroyers and submarines.
    And from a meta perspective Britain really needs a breath of fresh air to become relevant again. With the amount of different stuff Poland had in its arsenal it'd benefit Britain a lot.

    • @fegelein2233
      @fegelein2233 Місяць тому

      because everyone enjoys leoaprd Thunder already let's give britain Leopards with the already good air tree ignore the fact 99% of anything Poland ahs tank wise is Either US or german modern day,You also seem to forget gaijin IF i recall did say India was gonna belong in Britain meaning on top of I want to say Su33s its going to have quite a bit of other things like T-90S Bhishma,
      T-90MS Bhishma, Bhishma Mk III, T-72 Ajeya, Ajeya MK2, Arjun, Zorawar LT

  • @vendetta8022
    @vendetta8022 Місяць тому +2

    I wonder where would Poland go. Big three already have a lot of vehicles, France has Dutch and Belgium subtree, UK has ZA sub tree, China has NK subtree if you are correct, Italy has Hungary subtree, Sweden has Finland subtree, only Japan and Israel has no subtree yet while not being the big three. But tbh Poland has K2, M1A2 and Leopard 2A5, any TT with Poland subtree will immediately go to S tier top tier.

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому

      You think it’d work if they combined Poland with Yugoslavia?

  • @abram4806
    @abram4806 Місяць тому +1

    BMD-1/2/3/4M should be added to the Soviets , BMDs are better than BMPs. They can be airdropped , amphibious, and they are very fast and just better than BMPs

  • @eeznav
    @eeznav Місяць тому +1

    I don’t think you’re giving the Bismarck enough credit. It absolutely had a huge impact on the Royal Navy by tying up forces just from the fear of it breaking out into the Atlantic.
    Also, it destroyed a much beloved battle cruiser. And it took a ton of damage to sink the dang thing after it was hopelessly outnumbered.
    It was a masterfully commanded battleship and deserves a place among the finest warships of the era.

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 Місяць тому

      its sister ship did more for the war effort without firing a single shell then the bismarck did, it only sunk the hood because of a lucky shot. it was pretty much disabled by a single battle ship (rodney) and it ended up being sunk by a biplane, it wasnt the finest warship.

    • @abioticlife9087
      @abioticlife9087 Місяць тому

      ​@@datcheesecakeboi6745didn't the swordfish only destroy the rudder forcing the bismarck into circles, leading to the crew scuttling the ship

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 Місяць тому

      @@abioticlife9087 no? the battleship critically damaged the bismarck, causing the circles, the swordfish sunk it, people claimed it was scuttled but it was too damaged to be scuttled

  • @wifi_soldier5076
    @wifi_soldier5076 Місяць тому +2

    i hope we get BeNeLux ground sub-tree next update.

  • @henrycastle6584
    @henrycastle6584 Місяць тому

    It may have lasted one year but it got hunted by half the royal navy and got crippled in the most unlucky way. From a torpedo from a swordfish that jammed the rudder... Still a mystery how the swordfishes reached close enough to launch their torpedos and did not get shot down. Despite that. During the next battle it basically became target practice for the royal navy. Even then, the brits could not sink it. It was finally the germans themselves that scuttled it. It was a great ship, ahead of its time in design but it lacked the support any capital ship needs. The whole idea to send it alone in the atlantic to raid convoys showed some serious incopetence up in the command chain.

  • @mattwalshe.-_-6388
    @mattwalshe.-_-6388 Місяць тому

    FROM THE MIST A SHAPE A SHIP IS TAKING FORM, AND THE SILENCE OF THE SEA IS ABOUT TO DRIFT INTO A STORM!

  • @jw1343
    @jw1343 Місяць тому +3

    Another day, another massive gap in the US SPAA line

  • @mk2389
    @mk2389 Місяць тому

    If you're interested in how AESA radar works, you should check out how 5G signals for our phones are transmitted. It's basically the same concept, and there's a lot more public info about 5G basestations than there ever will be about military AESA radar.

  • @brandonho5266
    @brandonho5266 Місяць тому +2

    6:12 Johnny Horton intensifies

  • @09Ceekay
    @09Ceekay Місяць тому +1

    The Bismarck was fine as a ship, but the aera of battleships was over with the introduction of planes.

  • @armando3168
    @armando3168 Місяць тому

    Some dataminer said on the previous leak list posted on reddit that there are some more romanian vehicles in the pipeline, maybe we will get more stuff for Italy in the future.

  • @OrdinaryViewer808
    @OrdinaryViewer808 Місяць тому +35

    Is it just me or do we get the „new subtrees“ part every video, with just the same information? Yes there will be subtree xyz in the future, but we dk when or where it will be added??? Why keep clickbaiting with it over and over again when its all just speculations?

    • @宋教仁-b4i
      @宋教仁-b4i Місяць тому +8

      Because that's what TEC does.

    • @Dustjn
      @Dustjn Місяць тому

      Hope of a complete new nation ( Turkey or South/North Korea TT )

    • @ProjektF91
      @ProjektF91 Місяць тому

      They need views, LOTS OF VIEWS

  • @alexisbierquedebirkadefauv1744
    @alexisbierquedebirkadefauv1744 Місяць тому

    Oh and the Type 15 has a bustle autoloader with blowoutpanels

  • @themando9536
    @themando9536 Місяць тому +2

    Still waiting for the Czechoslovak sub tree, it can offer sooo much, even in the pre-war era and it makes me mad, that North Korea has it´s own tree sooner with what they got in their army xd

    • @ARI-ks1vj
      @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому +1

      Fr bro. And the yugo tech tree

  • @enderman8151
    @enderman8151 Місяць тому

    They should add some upgraded Type 62 variants before type 15. The type 62G is interesting for example.

  • @thepresident1971
    @thepresident1971 Місяць тому +2

    Idk why but i really want a polish T-34s

  • @TeoAnimations
    @TeoAnimations Місяць тому

    Bulgaria is also using the Osa anti air system. In fact, its one of our few😅

  • @guilhermecampello3345
    @guilhermecampello3345 Місяць тому

    17:25 It took me some time to understand he was saying AESA radar cause he was saying A E S A

  • @sesameoil0009
    @sesameoil0009 Місяць тому

    i feel like if the koreas got their own tech tree that would be much cooler than if they were both sub techtrees
    it can give people a taste of western and eastern style mbts

  • @dbrk9991
    @dbrk9991 Місяць тому

    For Korea it would be interesting to have a single Korean tech tree with both the DPRK & ROK together, just like they did with the Chinese tech tree

  • @fatnugget4436
    @fatnugget4436 Місяць тому

    When the Bismarck comes out, I wanna see SMS Bismarck versus HMS hood legendary battle

  • @toomuchganksta5828
    @toomuchganksta5828 Місяць тому

    the hood found the Bismark and on that fatal day

  • @Azcabalt
    @Azcabalt Місяць тому +11

    I don't think Poland should be added to Britain.Even their political ties are not so huge. Polish soldiers fought with the British during WW2 but that's it. Britain recognized lately the Polish government in exile. They used some Shermans and British planes but that's it. I mean most of their vehicles from cold war, contemporary times have nothing to do with Britain. It would be the same as putting them in the US tree because they ordered Abrams and used Shermans ... Honestly with such a complete tree for Cold War / High tier, I think Poland deserves its own tech tree starting at 4.7 a bit like Israel.

    • @FunFishFacts
      @FunFishFacts Місяць тому +12

      I think like a united central European tree could be a good idea like a polish /Czech/Slovakian TT to also avoid any controversy

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 Місяць тому +6

      atleast israel has its own unique top tier, poland doesnt, its just a bunch of soviet tanks then nato tanks, hell the only unique polish tanks were from the interwar period, ww2 it was using allied tanks

    • @midnightteapot5633
      @midnightteapot5633 Місяць тому +2

      If we want to get serious and forget for a moment this is just a game, the fact that under pressure from Stalin, the Poles were banned from any participation in the great victory parade in London should put an end to the idea of adding them to the British tree. Give them an independent tree.

    • @2727daqwid
      @2727daqwid Місяць тому

      I prefer it being added to Britain over Gaijin seeing that most of our tanks are soviet and adding us to russia. I would lose my shit and delete the account instantly, as I'm sure a lot of Polish players would do.
      I'm fine with separate tech tree, however, we would struggle with air. It would be basically 3 or 4 unique aircraft and the rest just like Israel - copy paste with different cammo. I grinded out the whole ground tree because it's interesting and fun (for me), however, the air and helicopters is just simply boring and I've got no interest in it since I already have most of the vehicles Israel has, just in a different trees.
      There is also the issue of Germany already having the Leo PL, which would need to be either reskined (maybe) or moved to Britain / separate tech tree (won't happen). Otherwise we are losing one vehicle in that tree.
      I think at this point WT should drop national tech trees, and just create some sort of "company/manufacturer" tech trees. This would make things way easier for them.

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 Місяць тому

      @@2727daqwid what about manufacturers that got brought out/no longer exist?
      Also 80% of the tanks in the game would be moved to either BAE, The 2 Russian companies or some American company

  • @Mlekopl
    @Mlekopl Місяць тому +1

    14:28 i think that 🇵🇱 is going to be not like Israel because we have in Poland for example 7 tp, tks and more of tanks and its from a before the war

  • @DontStealMyNoEffortName
    @DontStealMyNoEffortName Місяць тому +1

    still waiting on submarines to be added to naval

  • @ARI-ks1vj
    @ARI-ks1vj Місяць тому +1

    They should honestly just add Poland and Yugoslavia together. It makes no sense to me why they’d add it to Britain or any other country.

  • @botaccount5166
    @botaccount5166 Місяць тому

    BR is directly tied not just with vehicle stats but also game mode and map design.
    Most ships in the game are at the same br because gaijin refuses to fix the maps, forcing everyone into one play style where a single type of ship dominates.
    Due to the map design, each tech tree cannot utilize it's full potential leading to a single tree dominating, thus funneling more and more vehicles into said nation as it becomes the meta.
    For true balance and fairness to all. Gaijin should focus alot on fixing their game mode instead of new vehicles. The roadmaps were what made War thunder more fun, not Insanely broken vehicles

  • @barrycabbageM34
    @barrycabbageM34 Місяць тому

    I'm really hoping for an Argintine air subtree for Germany, something to beef up the top tier options.

  • @pusmblb
    @pusmblb Місяць тому +1

    Btw the Germans have several polish vehicles to

  • @idkman..69
    @idkman..69 Місяць тому +1

    He is shitting on how short lived the bismarck was even though the whole british navy was after it and when they found it the only reason they managed to kill it was because of a lucky torpedo hit on the rudder which of course they couldn't fix on the spot😂🤦‍♂️

  • @perkisowy
    @perkisowy Місяць тому

    I'm a Pole and Polish War Thunder Community wants polish sub tree or normal tree since like 2013 so if it would be added it would be very nice

  • @Miklos_Horthy4865
    @Miklos_Horthy4865 Місяць тому +1

    if Poland ever to be added into the game they should make it named intermarium and add the Slovaks, Yugo's, and Ukrainian tanks and jets/planes into the game

  • @vizender
    @vizender Місяць тому

    Considering the fact that France got air Benelux 2 updates ago, with leaked ground list (and most leaked vehicles have hidden files in game), that Italy had the same calendar last year with Hungary, and got the ground free at this update, and lastly that Germany is getting a Benelux produced turret event vehicle (cockerill), every and any leaklist that does not mention a Benelux ground line for France will be deemed as false to me

  • @gevorex2972
    @gevorex2972 Місяць тому

    Blohm & Voss are ship builders. They still exists.

  • @Utopied24
    @Utopied24 Місяць тому

    The only reason the Bismarck sank so quickly into its career is because it got hunted down by planes and ships just because it was scuttled so quickly isn’t because it was a bad ship battleships we’re already getting outclassed by it’s time

  • @judasz5645
    @judasz5645 Місяць тому

    Imo north korea sub tree to china tree
    South korea sub tree to japan tree
    And polish should be added later when there will be K2 in game

  • @_spooT
    @_spooT Місяць тому

    I don't see the Spyder working in game. My country acquired some from Israel, but from what I see, it requires 2 vehicles, the Radar, and the one carrying the Launcher. this could work as an airbase spaa, or they could somehow pull a towed radar.

    • @C8-H8
      @C8-H8 Місяць тому

      It’s going to be the Spyder AiO which carries its own radar (aesa I think) and 4 or 8 python 5 with 15 km range and derby with 20 or 40 km range (depending on the model)

    • @_spooT
      @_spooT Місяць тому

      @@C8-H8 oh, if that's the case then it might just actually work.

  • @vojnanaoruzanja9901
    @vojnanaoruzanja9901 Місяць тому +13

    We gonna get Mexico before Yugoslavia

  • @mattbrix350
    @mattbrix350 Місяць тому

    The Czech guy asking for it in the Facebook WT page will continue his suffering.

  • @ChaddicusMaximuss
    @ChaddicusMaximuss Місяць тому

    If they add the Bismark and not the Littorio I ll cry

  • @emilgirginov9848
    @emilgirginov9848 Місяць тому +40

    North Korea for China and South Korea for Japan maybe? Japan could really use some of their vehicles. And maybe rename the tech tree to "JP/SK" or something to not piss off both communities

    • @Kirito_01422
      @Kirito_01422 Місяць тому +1

      North Korea would make sense but the only thing really barring it's existence outside of just more ussr vehicles from the cold war would be any source of credible info. By all means they might just be slapping Era on top of a cold war t-55 and parading fake "modern" vehicles. Honestly put I wouldn't be surprised if all the numbers given to gaijin for chinese and russian vehicles are extremely inflated numbers ignoring gaijin "balancing" vehicles. There is an odd lack of logic behind alot of vehicle models and they of course will guestimate these numbers even more so from the so called hermit kingodom. And the weird South Korea and Japan combo while logical is very unlikely do to odd national grievances. It doesn't really occur much among the younger citizens it seems but that was the supposed reason for Thailand to be tossed into the Japanese tree with the f5e which ironically isn't even indigenously Thai but an american shell filled with Israeli electronics..... Well either way more vehicles would be nice or they could just throw out a South Korean tree straight out and do what they did with Israel and start em rank 5 with the cold war era vehicles.

    • @danielwang6201
      @danielwang6201 Місяць тому +10

      The forum would explode if Gaijin add SK to Japan tree

    • @namsangi1231
      @namsangi1231 Місяць тому +7

      Every Korean who plays warthunder is gonna end it all if Korea is added to Japan tree

    • @emilgirginov9848
      @emilgirginov9848 Місяць тому +1

      @@danielwang6201 yeah true, so what im saying is why not rename it to something like "East Asia" or whatever, even tho it wont have Taiwan it can still get a lot of Malaysian/Indonesian/Singaporean vehicles together with the SK

    • @GXR_Murcielago92
      @GXR_Murcielago92 Місяць тому +1

      It would be a loud minority the majority wouldn't give a fuck(South korea has bigger IRL issues).If SK won't be added as it's own nation or as a sub tree for Japan they shouldn't add it all the US doesn't need any sub tree in any shape or form

  • @shaoyanghuang6016
    @shaoyanghuang6016 Місяць тому

    The thing about NK sub-tree, I don't think China needs it. Iirc, Gaijin mainly adds sub-trees to nations that need a sub-tree to bolster it. I don't see where China is lacking enough to warrant a sub-tree.

  • @44mikatje
    @44mikatje Місяць тому

    im still waiting for dutch crew on the new ifv, ill take that over a dutch tree because i want some actual dutch smacktalking in game

  • @Kettleman1.0
    @Kettleman1.0 Місяць тому

    Trust gaijin to add, bismark as tech tree then tirpitz as a premium to cash in on that bismark class hype

  • @PaulieLDP
    @PaulieLDP Місяць тому

    This leak is having a laugh if they think two sub trees are coming in one update, unless they are 100% copy paste.

  • @Aqua_Nerd
    @Aqua_Nerd Місяць тому +5

    As soon as the Bismarck is added. I'm dusting off my swordfish

  • @joanfayoscastells9926
    @joanfayoscastells9926 Місяць тому +3

    6:20
    From the mist, a shape,a ship, is taking form
    And the silence of the sea is about to drift into a storm
    🗣️🔥🔥

  • @normal-potato05
    @normal-potato05 Місяць тому

    I would love it if they add SK to Japan, since Japan is really lacking in vehicles, but I get that players would have a problem with it. I wish SK could be a small tech tree like Israel.

  • @leeneon854
    @leeneon854 Місяць тому

    Yorck class is the battle cruiser, ersatz yorck class, 15inch guns, dought it will be armoured cruiser

  • @TheMachoManlyMan
    @TheMachoManlyMan Місяць тому

    Huh, armored cruiser Yorck feels like an odd addition. It feels like the unfinished battlecruiser Yorck would be a better fit for naval

  • @Ulfur8574
    @Ulfur8574 Місяць тому

    If they adding Bismarck. They better add Littorio to Italy

  • @ace_ofchaos9292
    @ace_ofchaos9292 Місяць тому

    Yeah air power isn’t a thing in naval anymore since Gaijin keeps adding SAMs to it. Then people wonder why battleships dominate the entire mode 6.0 onwards. Its even worse in EC.

  • @petergray2712
    @petergray2712 Місяць тому

    Update
    "Chollima"
    Possible North Korean tech subtree (China Tech Tree)
    Tanks:
    T-34-85 Medium Tank
    IS-2 Heavy Tank
    T-54 MBT/Type 59 MBT
    Ch'onma-ho MBT (T-62)
    Pokpung-ho MBT (T-62ish)
    Songun-915 MBT (T-72ish)
    Cheonma-2 MBT (Little bit of this, little bit of that, a misbegotten bastard. Ever get the feeling that NK is basically Mordor?)
    PT-76 Light Tank
    Shin'heung Light Tank
    Tank Destroyer:
    SU-76 AG
    SU-100 TD
    VTT-323/100 mm gun
    9P122 Malyutka ATGM
    Bulsae-4 ATGM TD
    Antiair:
    Model 1978 SPAAG (37 mm)
    Model 1989 SPAAG (30 mm)
    IFV:
    Model 2010 APC
    BTR-80A IFV
    SPH:
    Tokch'on Model 1974 SPH (152 mm/L34)
    Model 1977 SPH (122 mm/L38)
    Chuch'e'po Model 1991 SPH (122 mm/L52.9)
    Fighters:
    Yak-9P
    Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15
    Shenyang F-5
    Shenyang J-6
    Chengdu J-7
    Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21PFM/MF/bis
    Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23
    Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 (9.12B)
    Bombers:
    Ilyushin Il-10
    Ilyushin Il-28
    Sukhoi Su-7
    Sukhoi Su-25
    Helicopters:
    Mil Mi-24
    Boeing MD-500

    • @timvanranderaad7833
      @timvanranderaad7833 Місяць тому

      The koksan would also be cool and the m2020 as a toptier vehicle

  • @Rud01f
    @Rud01f Місяць тому

    As a Pole, I'd disagree with the sub tree being in Britain. I think it'd be better as a stand alone along with czechia, romania, or maybe even slovakia/other yugoslav vehicles. Otherwise I don't know, theres a lot of US vehicles it adopted in the modern day.

  • @strf90105
    @strf90105 Місяць тому

    north korean tech tree be like stock T-34-85 with gen 1 thermals at 8.7

  • @MadCard05
    @MadCard05 Місяць тому

    If they add the Bismarck, without increasing the BR of Naval, not to mention adding other nations 1930s BBs, they'll simply be no point in playing Naval unless it's a German ship.

  • @yizhenji5564
    @yizhenji5564 Місяць тому

    If the ZTQ15 is added, I would be already laughing at the T-90S

  • @MrFish-ei9ty
    @MrFish-ei9ty Місяць тому

    OSA! FINALLY!
    My favorite cold war AA system right after TOR!

  • @klipsfilmsmelbourne
    @klipsfilmsmelbourne Місяць тому

    The model of Bismarck leaked and gagjin taking a pish
    If they finally adding German super battleship now they can counter all nation ships one but her aa kept missing shots like Star Wars stormtrooper
    Bombers are gonna have hard time because of in game bots and missile vessels will shoot bombers so easily

  • @SHEEPS_123
    @SHEEPS_123 Місяць тому

    The US needs a new top tier AA, the ADATS cant hit anything past 4 miles... which is a problem

  • @sgtj.peldridge4567
    @sgtj.peldridge4567 Місяць тому

    We need the SLAMRAAM Humvee with 120s and aim9xs

  • @TheUnseenWaffle
    @TheUnseenWaffle Місяць тому +1

    Que sabaton bismark while playing as bismarck

  • @B11205
    @B11205 Місяць тому +2

    Yugoslavia when

  • @Robert_Kawalec
    @Robert_Kawalec Місяць тому

    Add ROSOMAK to the Polish tree.

  • @harryshuman9637
    @harryshuman9637 Місяць тому

    Yeah, can't wait to wait 15 minutes to get into a 1v1 naval battle full of AI ships.

  • @Clap_
    @Clap_ Місяць тому +2

    Oh lord please let the ZTQ-15 come to the game i dont care about anything else

  • @nightwolf2378
    @nightwolf2378 Місяць тому

    Indian/South African Captured OSA would be nice too

  • @ThatGuyOrby
    @ThatGuyOrby Місяць тому

    If the Bismarck comes in I have to ask, where the hell is our Colorado Class or North Carolina Class? The US 14 inch guns are amazing both in game and historically but come on.

  • @g00seman
    @g00seman Місяць тому

    I can only pray that the bismarck is added or submarines, but im losing hope