So, try not to term it destructive criticism, just do your best to listen attentively, listen again, pause, and see if there is a question in there for you to answer. Most times, there is, proceed to answer the question, if you don't have the answer, or your answer is not accepted, then, either you take a clue from the lecturer, by accepting their point, or you remain silent. No need to get into a protracted argument. But most importantly, while preparing for your design, imagine the worst that can be said about your design, and be at home with it, so you don't lose your cool.
Thanks for the exposition
Pro tips ❤👌
Thanks alot for the video sir, it's really helpful
Thanks 👍
Can't lie
You're the Real Idan
My New favorite channel
I like this series, Should be named "Navigating through Architecture School"
And I'd love to contribute🙂
👌🔥
Omo
Thank you sir for this video. It will really go a long way to help in presentation.👍
Thank you sir, this video is full of insight, much appreciated.
Glad it was helpful!
What is the best way to handle destructive criticism from jurors in a design jury?
So, try not to term it destructive criticism, just do your best to listen attentively, listen again, pause, and see if there is a question in there for you to answer. Most times, there is, proceed to answer the question, if you don't have the answer, or your answer is not accepted, then, either you take a clue from the lecturer, by accepting their point, or you remain silent.
No need to get into a protracted argument.
But most importantly, while preparing for your design, imagine the worst that can be said about your design, and be at home with it, so you don't lose your cool.
🥀thanks a million Sir. Good thing I'm seeing this now 😅