Cutaway vs Non-Cutaway: Does it affect the sound?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
  • MORE INFO:
    Give us a call at (406) 290-9390 or email us at sales@musicvilla.com for more information. Website: musicvilla.com
    Does a Cutaway affect The Sound of an Acoustic Guitar?
    This video compares two Gibson Songwriter Deluxe Studio acoustic guitars. One is a cutaway and the other is a non-cutaway with a burst finish. Other than the cutaway and finish, these guitars are identical. Same woods, same strings, same appointments, same everything.
    Listen as Tony plays the two guitars back-to-back. Can you hear the difference? Let us know in the comments below!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @yankmywank
    @yankmywank 9 років тому +813

    any avid guitar player will notice the sound difference.. non cut away sounds a little deeper and richer. i like cut aways for the access to higher frets. but i love the warmness of the full body.. ugh such a hard decision for a buyer!!!!

    • @jairopo
      @jairopo 9 років тому +15

      Exactly my thoughts!

    • @Nihilism2011
      @Nihilism2011 9 років тому +34

      Yeah, I completely agree. It's a shame to have to sacrifice the bass to get lower neck access.

    • @dumbo800
      @dumbo800 9 років тому +21

      The non-cutaway pretty clearly has better sympathetic resonances, especially in the lower end.

    • @mdanthony18
      @mdanthony18 9 років тому +11

      I would just get the cutaway with some medium gauge strings, to kinda make up for lack of a warm full bodied sound.

    • @antoniosalvatore7986
      @antoniosalvatore7986 9 років тому +5

      I agree but what about a comparison with the standard venetian cut away and the florentine cutaway

  • @caolanoh1
    @caolanoh1 10 років тому +420

    The cut away has slightly more clarity but the non cut away has a fuller all round sound. Both as good as each other in my opinion

    • @vognell
      @vognell 10 років тому +15

      Agreed.

    • @akshayd211
      @akshayd211 9 років тому +4

      Caolan Ohara Very sensible of you. You have helped me choose my 1st new guitar. :)

    • @nicoluthi6452
      @nicoluthi6452 9 років тому

      Caolan Ohara also the guitars are not similair in its form which affects the sound too...

    • @TheJoshSchneider
      @TheJoshSchneider 9 років тому +3

      +Caolan Ohara I noticed that also. Cutaway has more focus. Non cutaway is fuller sounding. Both sound decent but not great IMO.

    • @TrollingMyLawn
      @TrollingMyLawn 9 років тому

      +Caolan Ohara Sort of tempted to record one of each of the same parts and layer them.

  • @emypena
    @emypena 5 років тому +60

    Damn, I knew it, this video justified the reason why I own more than one guitar.

  • @Rimorox
    @Rimorox 10 років тому +307

    I prefer the cutaway sound personally, I find it a lot brighter as well as have more clarity then without, but without has more bass end. Interesting, I'd love to own both though anyday

    • @antman2826
      @antman2826 10 років тому +13

      Than not then!

    • @getulioprates
      @getulioprates 5 років тому +2

      Cutaway sounds a little bit Sul Ponticello and the Non-Cutaway sounds a little bit Sul Tasto. I really believe the Cutaway will cut the mix (away).

    • @toteeicke7325
      @toteeicke7325 4 роки тому +2

      im sold on the cut away.

    • @mr.popoballballl745
      @mr.popoballballl745 4 роки тому +2

      i could simply play closer to the bridge to produce more brightness with the tension of the string on a full body......

    • @runnningonempty
      @runnningonempty 4 роки тому +1

      @@antman2826 you and the 10 goofs that make any big deal of this are worthless

  • @bambostarla6259
    @bambostarla6259 7 років тому +197

    I think you should have done a song that reaches the high frets to demonstrate the difference why you would want a cutaway in the first place

    • @joshuaft1
      @joshuaft1 5 років тому +9

      Too look cool, right?

    • @lucaswallo8127
      @lucaswallo8127 4 роки тому +9

      To not have all the higher frets be blocked

    • @MrDan-ff3iv
      @MrDan-ff3iv 4 роки тому +1

      Lmao

    • @braveheart4603
      @braveheart4603 3 роки тому +5

      I have cut away on both my dreadnoughts and i can probably count with the fingers on one hand the amount of times i've found it necessary haha.

    • @breauxtide6217
      @breauxtide6217 3 роки тому +2

      Were talking about the sound not what it can do

  • @Edwin-E
    @Edwin-E 10 років тому +255

    Non-cut has fuller sound. I prefer that one. Thanks for comparison. You got a new sub.

    • @allanaba8237
      @allanaba8237 5 років тому +2

      I think that depends on the tone woods being used. Try to use the same rosewood tone and it seems has no difference. The rosewood back and sides really differs with mahogany, maple or koa backs and sides.

    • @ritammukherjee6943
      @ritammukherjee6943 5 років тому +1

      But non cutaways are problematic while playing acoustic solos

  • @Lawls
    @Lawls 7 років тому +39

    I think it's really down to preference and what you need the guitar for, I'd say that the cutaway is good if played with other instruments, due to it have a brighter sound, so it'd be more prominent, the non-cutaway is good for solo playing, or maybe playing a rhythm bit in a song with a band.
    Personally I prefer the sound of the non-cutaway

  • @billwarner213
    @billwarner213 4 роки тому +13

    It DOES make a difference! I’d noticed when recording that my cutaway had a distinct “nasally” tone that I was not able to factor out. I began to wonder if it was something intrinsic to the guitar itself, which led me to your video. Thanks for the great vid!

  • @habibiak
    @habibiak 9 років тому +27

    I would take the cutaway out of the two. It sounds much brighter and for those people saying it lacks bass, just use a thicker pick. The cutaway is sexier plus you can easily access those higher frets. Viva cutaway....

  • @themanwins
    @themanwins 8 років тому +20

    The most noticeable difference is certainly the low end. Much more equal volume on the non-cutaway.

  • @timb5913
    @timb5913 9 років тому +26

    I'm sure the darker paint also makes a difference.

    • @jimiguitar100
      @jimiguitar100 8 років тому

      +I just want to post comments Apao hahahahahahahaa

    • @bonifacioaba6774
      @bonifacioaba6774 5 років тому

      Most experience luthiers are cautious in applying paint to the guitars caused overcoating it can greatly affect the tonal quality of the unit.

  • @Heliz08
    @Heliz08 10 років тому +50

    non cut has fuller sound, I like it more

  • @marcdellorusso180
    @marcdellorusso180 9 років тому +44

    Non cutaway sounds much fuller. I notice a fair amount of difference actually...I wanted a cutaway but I think I'll go with the standard acoustic.

    • @randomfingerboard
      @randomfingerboard 9 років тому

      I do quite a bit of blues 12th fret beyond. I would want one but I'm more for the sound

  • @headbanger-iq9dw
    @headbanger-iq9dw 7 років тому +40

    The cutaway has a brighter and twangier sound, especially on the higher notes. While the non-cutaway has a much warmer and fuller sound, especially on the lower notes.

  • @kerryspitzer6037
    @kerryspitzer6037 8 років тому +58

    I can't believe it! I actually prefer the sound of the cutaway. It sounds richer and maybe a smidge brighter.

    • @MybeautifulandamazingPrincess
      @MybeautifulandamazingPrincess 2 роки тому +2

      From this comparison I found I actually prefer the cutaway sound too, it's the sound of the country music I listen to. So im glad to find out you don't lose much with the cutaway

  • @TheOtherDonJohnson
    @TheOtherDonJohnson 10 років тому +2

    Very nicely produced video. The trouble taken to make a direct comparison possible is really appreciated. Thanks!

  • @AmplifiedGaming2000
    @AmplifiedGaming2000 9 років тому +51

    Very good comparison, personally I prefer the bright more high end tone the cutaway produces the non-cutaway was far bassier and was missing the nice crisp sound.

    • @shiraga0516
      @shiraga0516 9 років тому +10

      Cutaway model sounds (kind of) Martin-ish, doesn't it?

    • @srv1231
      @srv1231 9 років тому +4

      shiraga Thats exactly what I was thinking.

    • @mailawalker7692
      @mailawalker7692 4 роки тому

      I would rather to buy cut away because it sound so clearly and a bit crips...it nice for higher notes and probably for female songs

  • @godgirlsguitars
    @godgirlsguitars 9 років тому +3

    Wow what a difference! They both sound great! I noticed the cut away had more of a snarl growling midrange and had more treble in it so it was brighter.

  • @LiberTBo
    @LiberTBo 9 років тому +18

    I could hear a diminished volume on the high end with the cutaway, the standard had a richer fuller tone over all, they both sound beautifully, I suspect when they're plugged in, there's no difference whatsoever....

  • @mico1436
    @mico1436 10 років тому +14

    non-cutaway has more bass and mid tones for me cut away has more of the upper registered sounds :) really just depends on the genre and personal taste

  • @QtheMisanthrope
    @QtheMisanthrope 8 років тому +32

    the cutaway is so much brighter, but it lacks the bellow of the non cutaway.

  • @micachiang9533
    @micachiang9533 9 років тому +18

    Well I don't know about the others but I like the one with the cutaway better cuz I like the brighter sound. And my voice fits more if it's backed by the cutaway.

    • @PlanBrian7
      @PlanBrian7 9 років тому +1

      on that last melody though, i loved the non cutaway though. it was more intense with the added bass

  • @dudemanismadcool
    @dudemanismadcool 8 років тому +7

    I like the cutaway sound better but I can definitely see a non cutout being more appropriate for certain genres such as country music.

    • @kalanterry7508
      @kalanterry7508 8 років тому +7

      I usually associate brighter sounds country music.

  • @JonathanModoh
    @JonathanModoh 9 років тому +76

    currently asking myself "go for the cutaway sacrifice the bass but get more clarity and access to higher keys" or "go for the no cutaway and enjoy full bassy tone with warmth" so damn hard..... :(

    • @junricpunay6294
      @junricpunay6294 8 років тому +1

      +Jonathan Modoh choose the non cutaway,your not having fun in cut away the tone was so dry.

    • @JonathanModoh
      @JonathanModoh 8 років тому +8

      Jun Ric Punay what do you mean dry it sounds pretty nice in this video tbh

    • @junricpunay6294
      @junricpunay6294 8 років тому +2

      +Jonathan Modoh maybe if your playing on it with full band.but for me as a solo acoustic guitarist I prefered to use non cut it has a nice BASS response,and thats the very important factor for me hehehe specialy when ur a 1 man band or solo.

    • @JonathanModoh
      @JonathanModoh 8 років тому

      Jun Ric Punay​ ah ok haha I wish the cutaway could keep the benefits of a non cutaway since I do like to use the high keys sometimes but unfortunately nope :( cutaway wont be as bassy which sucks!

    • @junricpunay6294
      @junricpunay6294 8 років тому +1

      +Jonathan Modoh boss AD-3 floor based acoustic processing,gives a warmer richer sound I think that would be ur last option probably men

  • @RockStarOscarStern634
    @RockStarOscarStern634 3 роки тому +4

    The Cutaway design is really an Ergonomic variation of the traditional design to where the high notes are easier to reach, a good balance between aesthetic & playability. All those Electric Guitars have body shapes that are essentially Ergonomic variations of the traditional Acoustic shape too. Fasions come & go all the time due to updates.

  • @ishta
    @ishta 8 років тому +4

    As a jazz guitarist that plays all over the fretboard, I prefer cut aways. But you need a good maker that actually pays attention to the intonation up top and sets the frets really well. I do not buy into the argument that non cut aways sounds fuller. Move your right hand towards the bridge for brighter tone and away for warmer tone. If you want a fuller sound more bass, use heavier strings or upgrade your saddle, nut and pins. Depending on the setup, you can vary the tone and feel quite a ways. Also if you gig a lot, you are going to plug in anyway and I find cut-aways feedback less.

    • @djoelzzzhoolzzz4732
      @djoelzzzhoolzzz4732 8 років тому

      moving your hands across the guitar and the setup of your guitar in terms of strings, nut, sadle etc makes a whole lot of difference on the sound.
      still prefer the non cutaway guitar. just a fuller and more beefy sound.

    • @petercohen3966
      @petercohen3966 8 років тому

      +ishta Why do cutaways feedback less? I am thinking of switching from cutaway to non-cutaway so very curious.

  • @dh2602
    @dh2602 2 роки тому

    Oh my goodness, I turned my head away for a second while listening to the cutaway and instantly heard a change in fullness. When I turned back towards my computer I noticed you had switched to the non-cutaway. Definitely a change. I love the full sound of the non-cutaway. All my guitars are cutaway. Dang! Thanks for the comparison. Learn something new every day.

  • @jareks7881
    @jareks7881 4 роки тому

    I do realise this video is almost seven years old, but I can't help leaving a comment. I'm amazed the difference in tone is so noticeable to my ear. In fact, I did not expect to hear any. Thank you for the comparison.

  • @JPuckett89
    @JPuckett89 10 років тому +7

    Another factor that also comes into play is just the tonality of the wood in each guitar. You can pick up 2 exactly the same acoustics and there is a possibility one will sound different, better or worse, than the other. Wood is a natural material and like any natural material there will be inconsistencies.

    • @albertaviking
      @albertaviking 10 років тому

      You are exactly correct Justin.....It has nothing to do with the cutaway....It has everything to do with the individual guitar and the individuals preferences.

    • @nadirsheikh5938
      @nadirsheikh5938 10 років тому

      albertaviking HI, I am a pofessional keyboard player but am into learning guitar now, can you please recomend which one, I am confused b/w Nylon or steel and cutaway and non cutaway. However I do like the base in cutaway, so for a starter what shoudl I choose and which make? My budget is around £100 or $140 .Thanks

  • @moshe219
    @moshe219 8 років тому +4

    Thanks for the comparison. I heard no difference and now feel more comfortable buying a cutaway.

    • @FREDBLA
      @FREDBLA 8 років тому +7

      Listen again !!

    • @TheoreticalLimit
      @TheoreticalLimit 8 років тому +1

      Listen with better monitors or good headphones. There's a big difference ! The full body has more bass while the cutaway is brighter.

    • @KaleAshrim
      @KaleAshrim 8 років тому +3

      Yeah - go with your own perceptions. Mostly people hear what they expect to hear, so any comparison can not be remotely objective unless done blind.

    • @TheoreticalLimit
      @TheoreticalLimit 8 років тому +2

      It's not a question of personal expectation. There is a clear and distinct difference. Even blindly tested.
      That said, What you prefer is your choice. But we can't say they sound the same.

    • @MattyPeq
      @MattyPeq 6 років тому

      They sound identical, deaf noob.

  • @dartht.3736
    @dartht.3736 2 роки тому +2

    I think the difference is the cutaway dampens some of the harmonic overtones on the higher notes. They seem to ring just as long but there’s less full range to them. You can hear them sounding a little tinnier, like some of the comments they’re not as full

  • @kenbina
    @kenbina 3 роки тому +1

    Cutaway has a more focused sharper to establish. The non-cutaway has a fuller tone, but some of the notes sound muddier and drowned out. Other than those differences, they both sound great.

  • @gordontubbs
    @gordontubbs 10 років тому +3

    I would've demo'd both guitars with their onboard pickups. This would eliminate mic placement error and give a better representation as to the physics of how the sound pressure levels are resonating inside those guitars... not out of them.

  • @davecal1991
    @davecal1991 10 років тому +10

    I love the sound on the cutaway. sounds a bit more broad

  • @MattJasa
    @MattJasa 4 роки тому +1

    I like how you cut back and forth between guitars while playing the same song. It makes it easier to tell the difference.

  • @e.a.r.9155
    @e.a.r.9155 6 років тому +2

    Absolutely Professional Video. Nice work..! Very helpful.
    Wish all videos were this quality

  • @izzydownlow7349
    @izzydownlow7349 8 років тому +35

    Non cutaway just sounds lower

  • @boynamedlen
    @boynamedlen 10 років тому +78

    Cutaway sounds crisper, non-cut sounds very full and maybe a bit boomy for my taste.

    • @deadc0w536
      @deadc0w536 10 років тому +5

      agree with u both

    • @deadc0w536
      @deadc0w536 10 років тому +6

      I personally like the cutaway more thoug

    • @Floydandsome
      @Floydandsome 10 років тому

      I like that kind of jangly tone

    • @Floydandsome
      @Floydandsome 10 років тому

      you know that kind of crispy tone

    • @randolphpatterson5061
      @randolphpatterson5061 9 років тому +1

      ***** If someone held a gun to my head, I'd have to say it is when it sounds like the harmonics burst out rather quickly when two or more strings are played, particularly when they are rich enough to sound almost blurry and overwhelm the fundamental notes a bit. I mean that in a good sense.

  • @faisalsajjad7396
    @faisalsajjad7396 4 роки тому

    Video was made 6 years ago but still the best I've seen❤️

  • @ytromu
    @ytromu 8 місяців тому

    In your application there is a slight difference in sound. As one mentioned the sound is brighter, more crisp. The cutaway was designed to allow better access down the fretboard.

  • @gordoncowan50
    @gordoncowan50 10 років тому +5

    Great comparison. I have to say its different but I liked them both. It probably comes down to how often you need to go above 12th fret. I'm very slightly preferring the cutaway in sound and also because (annoyingly) I need to play above 12th fret sometimes.

  • @itsckbro8778
    @itsckbro8778 8 років тому +7

    Non cutaway is more denser while the cutaway is more open

  • @Baneslayer
    @Baneslayer 11 років тому +2

    You are missing one key point. NO two guitars sound the same. They are all made from different cuts of wood... Even if they are from the same tree they will have different tonal and resonant properties.... Is it the cutaway? Or is it just the fact that they are made from different cuts of wood, which is part of the whole beauty of acoustic guitars and playing them until you find that exact guitar that sounds like "the one" to you....

  • @MackDaddyVic
    @MackDaddyVic 2 роки тому

    Damn, this video is 9 years old. I was like 18 when this came out. Damn time flew by hard.

  • @raymondchew8894
    @raymondchew8894 8 років тому +11

    I like the cut away and it sound clear and precise.

  • @bukchoibros4682
    @bukchoibros4682 10 років тому +8

    I think that the sound that was on the non cutaway was not as Bright as the Cutaway

  • @jyabriel08
    @jyabriel08 3 роки тому

    I've never played guitar but I did play piano years and years ago and it's such a distinct difference.
    Choosing is more difficult than I thought but I appreciate the video!

  • @musicman5269
    @musicman5269 2 роки тому +1

    Yes, sound quite different !
    Cutaway is more sharp !
    Thanks for your comparison.

  • @alexandert696
    @alexandert696 7 років тому +5

    You cant make guitar sound the same.. Even the same model will sound differently . With that being said yes there is a difference .

  • @RandyGunter
    @RandyGunter 10 років тому +5

    I think if you took two identical guitars (either cutaways or full, doesn't matter), you could hear that much difference. Every guitar is unique. The grain of the wood, the glue on the bracings, the neck setup, everything will affect the sound. In order to truly hear if there is a different between a cutaway and a non-cutaway, you should have about five of each of them, compare them all, and then see if there is a consistent difference between the five cutaways and the five non-cutaways. Otherwise the only real conclusion you can draw is that those two particular guitars sound different, and whether it is the cutaway that makes the difference or some other factor is just conjecture.

  • @jeffrey.a.hanson
    @jeffrey.a.hanson Рік тому

    In 2022 the difference still blows me away. For singing I prefer the cutaway sound.

  • @starcaster
    @starcaster 11 років тому

    Meant to add, yes, I agree with the consensus that the non-cutaway has a fuller sound, though both sound good.

  • @GeroLubovnik
    @GeroLubovnik 10 років тому +53

    The non-cutaway version has MUCH more depth of sound. The lows resonate and balance out the mids and highs nicely. On the cutaway the lows are cut off. IMO there is no contest. The sunburst wins, hands down.

    • @aspexpl
      @aspexpl 10 років тому +11

      I'm not an expert and the video compression kills the sound but you're right, even to me, the non-cutaway sounds clearly richer.

    • @TheNazmi98
      @TheNazmi98 10 років тому +1

      Luís Piteira the cutaway is easier to reach lower frets than the non cutaway

    • @GeroLubovnik
      @GeroLubovnik 10 років тому +1

      Yes. That is the reason for the cutaway. But it makes sense that that non-cutaway has a more resonant sound. If you imagine sound waves bouncing all around inside, you can visualize the angles and see how the cutaway redirects sound waves in a non-symmetrical pattern. Hence, some frequencies will decay more quickly in this model. Of course this will vary from model to model, and even in "twins" as (pointed out by others) that every piece of wood has its own resonant character.

    • @maraviyoso8473
      @maraviyoso8473 10 років тому +1

      MUCH more?

  • @cbfbaritone
    @cbfbaritone 10 років тому +3

    It seems that the non cutaway is more balanced with more low end and the cutaway has a brighter sound.

  • @solaris6096
    @solaris6096 3 роки тому +1

    I *hugely* prefer the cutaway tonally! I really like the softer, brighter tone the cutaway gives. If it's a taylor, that makes it even brighter which is what I love in acoustics.

  • @bertoasaber
    @bertoasaber 9 років тому +2

    Cutaway brighter, but it's a good thing

  • @aswinbeats
    @aswinbeats 8 років тому +18

    I liked the sound of the cutaway guitar more. Has a more "Rock" sound.

    • @aswinbeats
      @aswinbeats 7 років тому +6

      Three months later, I like the non-cutaway sound more! :P

    • @The_Bird_Bird_Harder
      @The_Bird_Bird_Harder 4 роки тому +1

      @@aswinbeats What about three years later?

    • @aswinbeats
      @aswinbeats 4 роки тому +4

      Lol. Still loving that mellow non-cutaway sound with more body. Got myself a Seagull S6 Entourage Rustic guitar.

    • @The_Bird_Bird_Harder
      @The_Bird_Bird_Harder 4 роки тому +3

      @@aswinbeats Damn you responded, but yeah I definitely agree. I found this video because I've been looking into purchasing a guitar to have another activity during the pandemic, so far it's decided to be a non-cutaway dreadnought.

    • @aswinbeats
      @aswinbeats 4 роки тому +1

      The Bird Go to UA-cam. Search “Seagull S6 Rustic”. Click the video by Guitar Center and listen. Buy the guitar. That’s what I did. 😂

  • @capoman1
    @capoman1 10 років тому +5

    The answer: HELL YES. The sound was affected. The A-B is very easy to hear a difference.
    Is it "a negative difference?" Not necessarily. Some may actually prefer how the cutaway decreases some of the bass tones and lowers the overall output of the guitar.
    I know that the Taylor cutaway models are much more popular selling than the standard versions. Try to find some used Taylors, you will find that there are several more cutaways listed than the standard versions.
    You might argue that "more used ones for sale means more people were dissatisfied with them and are now selling them;"
    But I really doubt that. I don't think there are just a ton of idiots out there hand selecting guitars that they have not well researched or bought impulsively, and then realizing later that they don't like them.
    I think that several times more cutaways are sold, and that is why the number on the used market is higher.

  • @justincraig5858
    @justincraig5858 5 років тому

    I have a cutaway dreadnought guitar. I'm pleased to see all the support this type is getting in the comments section. I would describe my cutaway as sounding very bright and sweet, like honey. It has a balance between sparkly and snappy. Hard to describe.

  • @pauljohnson5116
    @pauljohnson5116 5 років тому

    Both sound beautiful and so close to each other but so different it's crazy how wood thickness and shapes can change sounds

  • @Vplayso2
    @Vplayso2 7 років тому +5

    cut away is more brighter I guess

  • @andydiep1992
    @andydiep1992 10 років тому +5

    Personally, I felt that cutaway sound slightly better than the non cutaway.

  • @corey1a1
    @corey1a1 7 років тому +2

    Like most say, there is a difference, but it doesn't mean better or worse. Just depends on the sound you want. The non cutaway definitely has a deeper tone.

  • @sassulusmagnus
    @sassulusmagnus 6 років тому +1

    Two acoustic guitars of the same model and year will often sound different. This seems especially true with Gibsons. I once auditioned about 6 or 7 brand new J45's back to back in the same store. The differences in the voice of each guitar were mostly subtle, though not in every case. Two of them stood out as much more balanced and open sounding than the other identical guitars. While a cutaway may tend to affect the sound of a particular model in a particular way, the net sonic result will depend on additional factors. You might find that the cutaway version is either more or less clear sounding than the non-cutaway version.

  • @jimiguitar100
    @jimiguitar100 9 років тому +8

    i need a cutaway cause I need those high notes, but the quality of the sound is way too lower. Now what :(

    • @LPKJFHIS
      @LPKJFHIS 8 років тому

      Martin Grand Performance Cutaway Body Style. IMO you won't notice the difference because you'll fall in love with the guitar.

    • @jimiguitar100
      @jimiguitar100 8 років тому +1

      LPKJFHIS thanks man! I always feel streched between a real need for a cutaway and the better sound of noncutaway... I will check your recomandation

  • @GuitarRocks360
    @GuitarRocks360 9 років тому +6

    The way I hear it. Not much of a difference but the non-cutaway is a little bassy.

  • @johncrafton8319
    @johncrafton8319 7 років тому +1

    Big, big difference. That said, both still sound great. Personally, I prefer the sound of the non-cutaway in this case. It's this very difference that pushed me to select the non-cutaway version of the Art and Lutherie Concert Hall for myself.

  • @tmuka
    @tmuka 11 років тому +1

    this comparison definitely shows they sound different, but to me, on this recording, the cutaway sounds much better matched to that mic/EQ. In person, i almost always prefer the non-cutaway sound... the non-cutaway sounds really muddy in this example, but i think some post EQ could there... another interesting comparison i'd like to hear is if EQ in post could make them sound similar again...

  • @julesmaurice8772
    @julesmaurice8772 10 років тому +4

    Cutaway sounds more crisp, the non cutaway sound warmer.

  • @foamstrat
    @foamstrat 10 років тому +53

    The cutaway sounds cleaner. The non cutaway is bordering on muddy.

    • @omfg51
      @omfg51 10 років тому +2

      that would probably be due to the mic used and the placement

    • @snapascrew
      @snapascrew 10 років тому +7

      omfg51
      considering he's sitting in the exact same spot with both instruments and the same mic is being used in the exact same spot i don't understand your comment. if the only thing changing between the two clips is the guitar, and you hear a difference - it's not the microphone or placement. it's the guitar. hahaha

    • @omfg51
      @omfg51 10 років тому +1

      What I mean is, they both sound muddier in this video than in person.

    • @HooksBill
      @HooksBill 5 років тому

      Muddy? I don't hear muddy.

  • @rogersrandoms5405
    @rogersrandoms5405 10 років тому

    I would be glad to have which ever one you want to donate! They both sound amazing.

  • @Sysiphistication
    @Sysiphistication 7 років тому

    This is a good comparison. I'm sure that I do not have the world's best ears, but I do hear that the non-cutaway is slightly fuller, deeper. I wouldn't have guessed that it would make this noticeable a difference.

  • @reginaldopadua8258
    @reginaldopadua8258 9 років тому +4

    Cutaway sounds a little bit brighter than non cutaway, in my opinion.

  • @colbybryan7761
    @colbybryan7761 7 років тому +3

    I'm gonna go with cutaway. The high tones seem to ring out more. depends on the songs too though.

  • @ericrdutton
    @ericrdutton 6 років тому

    Wow that was a way bigger difference than I would have thought.

  • @festushaggen2563
    @festushaggen2563 9 років тому

    The full body sounds fuller, richer and resonates just that much better. Exactly the reason why I chose mine (Yamaha FG730s) over the cut away and the acoustic/electric.

  • @LucidNyte
    @LucidNyte 7 років тому +3

    The non cutaway has a fuller, almost darker sound. I prefer the cutaway though since it sounds brighter and I don't feel too overpowered by the sounds of the lower strings. That's just my preference though.

  • @raijin7707
    @raijin7707 8 років тому +3

    The cutaway seem to make higher sounds while the non cutaway sounds like it has more base. Male vs Female in simple terms.

  • @jyi468
    @jyi468 10 років тому +1

    It'd be nice to see a graphic EQ on the side while you play the guitars

  • @daveg5590
    @daveg5590 3 роки тому

    People love banging on about rich, warm, full and bright. Funny thing is it means something different to each of us.

  • @ljjelly
    @ljjelly 9 років тому +5

    cutaway is, twangier.. in a good way doe.. crisp sound.. less full bodied doe.. preference of whoever is hearing it

  • @mohamedhabib8982
    @mohamedhabib8982 9 років тому +3

    My opinin the cutway make sound better pluse able to solo better and trust me in that , full body guitar more warmer but cut way is hot this is my opinion ,

  • @simplygreg17ify
    @simplygreg17ify 5 років тому

    Oh wow, I had no idea !!! I'm glad I came upon this video because I would of never thought there would be that much of a difference in sound. VERY informative. I never thought about comparing for sounds but I much prefer the non-cutaway myself. Thanks again brother

  • @anthonycashero7605
    @anthonycashero7605 5 років тому

    I play a cutaway. But the non sound has a fullness to my ear that's beautiful. Thanks

  • @lorisharrissfactorpenumbra
    @lorisharrissfactorpenumbra 7 років тому +3

    same strings ?

  • @gitaarlessenamersfoort920
    @gitaarlessenamersfoort920 9 років тому +3

    People here seem to think there is an added brightness to the cutaway... I think its more because some (mid?)low frequencies are attenuated which only make the cutaway appear brighter..? Anyways the non cutaway sounds so much fuller

    • @DanielFlores-tv3zp
      @DanielFlores-tv3zp 9 років тому

      I totally agree. the cutaway is simply missing what the non-cutaway has. Id pick the non Cut any day.

    • @sebastian993
      @sebastian993 6 років тому

      You can definitely tell the difference once you play each. Go to a guitar store and try it

  • @barrywitt4618
    @barrywitt4618 4 роки тому

    You know the first time I purchased a pro level dreadnought guitar was back in the early 80s. I tried over 100 guitars at multiple music stores across Houston, Texas. I played the same model guitars several times. Lots of Martin's, Gibson's, Guild's, Alvarez Yairi's and numerous other brands. One thing I learned was that even two of the exact same brand/model guitars didn't always sound the same. Every different piece of wood has it's own character. I finally settled on an Alvarez Yairi DY46 which had the sweetest sound of any guitar I had played. My wife used to call it "Baby" I still have that guitar today. Long story short, I don't think we can completely contribute the tonal difference between the two guitars in this video to just the effect of the cutaway.

  • @abarbar06
    @abarbar06 4 роки тому +1

    I can clearly hear that the non-cutaway is more full sounding with more bass. HOWEVER, I think placing the microphone in a different location would make this difference less noticeable. He had it basically in front of the cutaway location. This could be totally wrong, but I suspect that mic placement in a more neutral location would result in a smaller difference between the two.

  • @simeonvassilev9395
    @simeonvassilev9395 9 років тому +3

    On the cutaway guitar, you can hear the overtones, which are high.
    On the non cutaway, the lower overtones are more hearable.

  • @milehodak4152
    @milehodak4152 8 років тому +4

    Cutaway has higher tone. like a quarter tone higher i think

    • @starry_lis
      @starry_lis 8 років тому

      We woud've hear the awful transition.

  • @MartimDurao
    @MartimDurao 11 років тому +1

    It seems to my ears that the Cutaway sounds a bit like it has a natural EQ, meaning it has less bottom end and the treble is more defined.

  • @googull271
    @googull271 11 років тому

    I listened with studio headphones and can tell you there is definately a difference. It was harder to hear with fingerpicking but when you started flatpicking, the difference was real noticable. I preferred the non cutaway because it had a more full sound. The cutaway sounded just a tad thinner but still really close. Thanks for posting this.

  • @overboardsancho383
    @overboardsancho383 5 років тому +4

    Which one will allow me to crank Dat Soulja boi?

  • @anilbyanju7919
    @anilbyanju7919 9 років тому +3

    Non cutaway sounded smoother.

  • @pickerdad8402
    @pickerdad8402 8 років тому +1

    Thanks very much for doing this. It makes the differences crystal clear, and we could never do this for ourselves when shopping.If you listen closely, the full body model has a full and balanced tone, whereas the cutaway REMOVES bass and treble from the tone (the total loudness goes down). It's like turning down the bass and midrange knobs, rather than turning up the treble. This happens because the guitar was designed for the full body version, and the cutaway was done without regard for any effect on the sound. The cutaway has changed the acoustic resonance within the guitar body so that bass and midrange waves are disrupted more than the treble. The result is a guitar that no longer works the way it was designed, and never will. If we wanted a guitar that was subject to all manner of tonal adjustment, we’d buy an electric, not an acoustic. We acoustic lovers want an instrument that produces the sound of all strings, through the balanced resonance of carefully selected and shaped woods. Which is what we hear from the full body model. The cutaway tone is not “brighter”, it is thinner.If I want a cutaway (and I do), I must look for one that is designed as a cutaway from the beginning. It will be a model that does not have a corresponding full body version. These are rare. So I will eliminate cutaways from my current search for a low-end guitar, and wait until I buy a more expensive or custom made instrument.

    • @Kougeru
      @Kougeru 8 років тому

      On the other hand, you can easily boost the bass and such on a decent acoustic amp to help make up for it. Or even make it "better", depending on your need.

    • @pickerdad8402
      @pickerdad8402 8 років тому +3

      +Kougeru
      Absolutely not the same. The cutaway never produces the tones that give it warmth and depth. Artificially boosting the volume of the flat bass does not put the missing tones back.

  • @ouncy
    @ouncy 9 років тому +1

    The difference of thickness of the lacquer on the tops are extreme.

  • @MrBeen992
    @MrBeen992 9 років тому +49

    lol. the real difference in these guitars was not the cutaway.The biggest difference is that one has an equalizer, volume box in the side of the guitar. The hole to put that makes a huge difference bigger than the cutaway. How this man can say that those 2 guitars were identical except for the cutaway ? is he blind ?

    • @TheTopMostDog
      @TheTopMostDog 9 років тому +14

      Disagree. That small surface area density change for sound to bounce off has a smaller effect than the angles of the box. Acoustics, dude. It would probably leak a little more sound to the player, but I'm afraid that's about the extent of the effect.

    • @Mbuya1
      @Mbuya1 9 років тому +6

      TheTopMostDog umm still the test in invalid due to the differences. The extra variable throws it into question

    • @TheTopMostDog
      @TheTopMostDog 9 років тому +11

      Adam Goleskie
      Lol, no. You could easily argue that the guitars' individual materials have an effect on the sound; one rosewood being slightly denser than the other, perhaps. Or maybe there were variations in the type of lacquer used, or it was applied thicker on one than the other. Of course there are going to be several extraneous variables, as is the case in almost every comparison; but they are simply insignificant compared to the variation between the shapes of the guitars, and far from enough to 'invalidate' this entire demonstration..
      In the video, the "real difference" - as it was said - is the body shape of the guitars.

    • @MrBeen992
      @MrBeen992 9 років тому +4

      TheTopMostDog It is obvious that you have a serious lack an understanding of acoustics as to simplify the acoustic problem in your terms and dont even consider the structure of the sound box and neglect the effect of a HOLE. I happen to work with a luthier that knows his physics very well.

    • @2011blueman
      @2011blueman 9 років тому +7

      Charlie Angel Not only that, but the sunburst paint job can actually have a very large effect on the overall sound of the guitar.

  • @LegendSexy
    @LegendSexy 10 років тому +7

    Id rather have the cutaway

  • @thefishrustler3893
    @thefishrustler3893 Рік тому

    WAY more difference than I expected. Full body for me…for sure. I don’t spend much time way up there on the dusty frets anyway so I want the richness of the full body.

  • @yvanneee4454
    @yvanneee4454 4 роки тому

    i love non-cuts in terms of sound and comfortability. Thank you for this ❣