Decided to toss this video on tonight to watch with my boyfriend. I had no idea Mel Fischer and the Atocha were a featured part. I was wearing my Atocha pendant at that very moment. I have one of Mel Fischer's reproduction coins made of silver removed from the wreck. I was lucky enough to visit the museum years ago and getting a shipwreck pendant was the only think my 15 year old brain could fixate on for that trip. It's been very dear to me ever since.
Except it's not his resting place, because he's wholly legendary, combined with the historical deeds of Ambrosius Aurelianus and a ton of fictional aspects like the sword in the stone.
@skepticalbadger It's not known if the deeds of Ambrosius Aureleus are the inspiration for Arthur. It has been wondered but not at all fact. There could well have been an Arthur, maybe inspired by others deeds, or just a completely made up figure.
As an Asian, I believe some of our legendary fighters and commanders exist, in particular Lu Bu who was considered the premier warlord and individual with the greatest martial prowess, despite having no remains as evidence. In regards to Arthur, his existence is most likely as a Romano British warlord as Roman history does not document about him. Therefore the legends about him are probably pointing to one individual that had a group of knights or elite cavalry bodyguards which could be the late Roman military type of commander. The late Romans used heavy cavalry and lancers like the sarmatians as elite auxiliaries. The late Romans also had more emphasis on armored cavalrymen in the Scolae system. So the Romano British had inherited that military Organization and transferred that into the Arthurian legends based off history being passed down by word of mouth due to the dark ages
If you haven't already read them, you might enjoy a series of historical fiction books written by Jack Whyte...the first book is called The Skystone. It begins as the Roman legions are leaving Britain and some officers set up what will become their own fortified village. Eventually the series nears Arthurian legend territory...it's well written and describes the sort of Romano British version of events you mention.
I think you are probably right. Although religions have been started with less evidence, so it could just be a fairytale. An ideal monarch invented in the early Middle Ages
It would be super cool if they extracted the dna of this body presumed to be King Arthur, to see where the descendants are. It would also be cool to do a modern analysis to determine what he would have looked like! History + anthropology + modern technology = (imo) the only good way to use technology!
I think they already did that but they don’t tell .. remember history is not told to us completely with all of the truth.. only what they consider we should know.. as all the books of knowledge are all destroyed.. I don’t think so 😅
Arthur was real, and one of the few original Male "Britons" to be King, post 5th Century, they were all Germanic, and, except for Diana's son's, they still are.
I remember when he found it, and the later story in Nat Geo. One chain in particular had been intricately wrought. He had been in the news enough that my family knew who he was, as did, I'm sure, many others. Generally speaking, most people knew he wanted to find Nuestra Senota de Atocha, but any progress or locations were never in the media, so everyone wondered about his efforts until the day the find was announced. There was general excitement at the notion that a "treasure hunter" had succeeded, and that of course Mel Fisher was the only one who could.
You would think an Academic would think to look for "the most original, oldest text, of the Genesis records", rather than a later Version with at least 3 transulations and with acknowledged mistransulations and misinterpretations. The 9ldest records are the Sumerian Cuneiform Tablets then the Old Hebrew Texts. Those in modern times have undergone known edits
Even if we accept that a pre industrial pre wheel civilization working with bronze could precision cut and smooth granite with such perfection, we also need to know the method they used to drill these blocks, often all the way through. Interestingly we see this in ancient Egyptian ruins. If we're so convinced we have the answers, then we would easily be able to demonstrate the technique but we can't, because we don't know.
This is not good history. Radford absolutely did NOT find the grave that the monks had excavated. The same updated research that you reference at the end (Gilchrist & Green, 2015) shows that it was a pit, not a grave, and was not of the right date "We must conclude that there is no archaeological evidence to support Radford’s claim that he located the 1191 exhumation site of the graves that were believed to be those of King Arthur and Queen Guinevere.” Also, the fact that Glastonbury as a site was later proven to date to the 6th century is neither here nor there for Arthur nor even the grave that was excavated. You'd have to show that the 'Tintagel ware' came from that context to know that the monks had really excavated a 'Dark Age' prestige grave. Even then, the 'find' of the lead cross is so clearly a hoax - not the first perpetrated by those monks.
Just as wild an opinion as believing there was a king arthur seeing as no one Alive today knows, to scoff and act like you have the answers is just as dumb no?
So, who was real in 5th century Britain? Someone must have been alive somewhere doing something. There is absolutely no reason to believe that the legends were not based on a probably far more compelling reality.
@@stanleyshannon4408 in the fifth century, no huge castles, no knights in shining armour , no magic swords, etc etc the King Arthur myth was a medieval creation, enlarged by Germanic myths, (Wagner's got a lot to answer for). Likewise the film Excalibur which although I love it, it's sheer fantasy. The KA myth is just another creationist myth ask n to 000's of pictorial myths all over the world, who made up stories to explain reality, the ultimate being JC superstar !
@@thatwilldonicely1314 so, between Patrick writing in the late 4th century about people doing stuff in Britain and Gildas writing in the early 6th century about people doing stuff in Britain during the 5th century, and various European writers writing about British people doing stuff in Britain, your hypothesis is that actually no one was doing anything because they didn't have any shiny armor? Everything was just made up later after they had shiny armor again?
@@thatwilldonicely1314 how about Coel Hen , Urien, Cunedda, et al, did they have no shiny armor? No fortified central community to live in ? They just lived under rocks and went about naked?
Good luck with Eden. Even if you do manage to find it (which you won't), there are 2 cheribum stationed to fly around and watch for any who arrive. With them is a flaming sword that flies around, denying all men entrance.
I think he did! Then he took poor sickly Arthur’s young Spanish bride, married her for himself, had a daughter with her and a few stillborn children, divorced her for illegitimate reasons and destroyed their lives. 😮 Wrong Arthur you say? History is written by the psychopathic blood pudding loving victorious I say!
King Arthur's bones were buried in Strathclyde. Edward 1st called this place Cameluk and is likely to have found them. Cameluk is an abbreviation of Cambusmaelok meaning the monastery of Saint Maelok. Isle of avalon is a island at the head of the river Avon called Louden this often gets confused with London. Saint Maelok was a cousin of Saint Patrick and a cousin of Arthur. Saint Maelok had a brother called Saint Gildas who's father was killed by Arthur. If you want to find Arthur find the locations of Ninnius's the battles of Arthur, again all in Strathclyde. Saint Maelok was exiled to Lugo Spain, so was Lancelot for 4 years that's because lancelot is lance of Lok / Luk / Loch where Lok is an abbreviation of Maelok. Saint Gildas's father was Cado / Caddow king od Strathclyde and the court of Caddow was where Guinever was first sent.
Did Bikecentennial Trail in 1978 .. traffic is likely much worse now. The original trail books suggested you could do the trip on as little as $3.00 a day. Wonder what inflation adjusted prices would do to that. (That might be food cost only). I had a budget of $1500.00 and spent all of it back then .. total cost, including a new rear wheel. Regardless, followed you all the way. Now considering adding a pinion drive bike to the fleet. Thanks
often depicted wielding the sword Excalibur, might not have been a single person at all? Many historians believe that the King Arthur we know from history documentaries and tales could actually be a composite of various leaders and warriors from early medieval Britain. Over centuries, their stories merged into one epic saga, giving us the mythic king celebrated today!
It's in Scotland lol look at the names he was a pictish warlord fighting northumbria around Lothian Merlin was a druid and guinevere is even there its well known
The character of King Arthur is a fiction imagine by a French author of FICTIONAL STORY‼ That imaginary story, which was rewriting and reedited a lot of time in time, by a lot of different writers, which is lead us to one direction, which can be a lot of things, but Historical accuracy ain't one of it.
So about the frankincense, one, this is so not truth it embarrassing Academically. First, anyone who's studied history, especially pertaining to the bible, should know that there was an occupation alive and well back then called being a scribe. In other words, these are people who are hired to literally write down events, important events as they happen. They did not record stories. This is the most disorganized theory or explanation of how the bible and it's record was produce that I have ever heard. It's not even historically accurate. Just saying
Mfer, I started eating fruity pebbles and drinking coke because of you. I would have loved to vote for you. Now Kamala gets it. Lesser of two evils,,,,
There was no King Arthur, it is mediaeval fiction c1136/8 onwards. The real Arthur is a Welsh figure, chief of Maelgwn ap Gwynedd's Teulu and nothing to do with any of this English rubbish.
What I have sent is made me believe at alot of hour store are some what reall. I seen it with my own eyes. So you are not me sn I'm not you. But I saying alot of old stories are some what true or just true.
The larger part of the Biblical Story(ies) sounding Questionable, Allagory, Metaphiric, can be far greater clarified "if they would go to the Oldest Hebrew Texts" and have these Transulated correctly The use of Versions of Biblical Texts are extremely riddled with misinterpreted content from the Greek B8ble, (Greek was 8nterpreted into Latin, later into Old English and rewritten in English the again 8bti Modern English Between Constatine's Priests who compiled the Texts, with known edits, to become the Bible, and the Popes adjusted, the a King, and each made deletiins and edits. The Bible truly required an Audit to the most original Texts and to be Transulated Correctly. Earth, not dirt or clay, Humans came from Earth and whatever intervention took place. This is what DNA studies reveal too. Beliefs that are Fear Based will result in resistance. Fear is the Tool used to manage the masses. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralistand Historian
I, too, am an individual whom delves in to many facets of info and interests and "FRUIT" is the most important misinterpretation that skews general understanding! "Go forth and BE FRUITFUL" meaning to procreate and have offspring; FORBIDDEN FRUIT REFERS TO CHILDREN!!!! In my opinion, the theory of the Garden of Eden presented here isn't correct... First off, how can you banish someone from a "nature" setting out to a nature setting? A garden is where life is grown, producing "fruit" from "trees"... "eat fruit from any tree in the garden (deer, rabbit, bird, etc), but not from the tree of life/knowledge" (own genetics/species) CHILD SACRIFICE/CANNIBALLISM HAS BEEN IN HUMANITY'S HISTORY SINCE THE BEGINNING!!!! Abraham's son, for example; partaking of communion/sacrament... ritual of symbolically EATING THE BODY OF/DRINKING THE BLOOD OF... The garden was a genetic lab where mankind and livestock (redundant statement) were created... Re-read yr biblical scriptures keeping this perspective in mind and ALL THE STORIES BECOME TOO CLEAR AND OBVIOUS!!!!! Religions are a farce, worshipping egomaniacal enslavers...
Lol the old guy tried to make it sound so cool and just tossed out numbers there's absolutely now way you would pull millions in gold out of a few feet. Even if you are pulling solid gold right out of the rock a pound is 20k its not that crazy where you would be insanely rich from a few feet. Even if you were pulling like 20 pounds a foot that's still like a million. That sounded really stupid and I nerded that out a bit and you get nowhere near anything like that from gold ore you get like 60 to 80 grams per ton if you got crazy rich from one spot it would be a cave of solid gold. That's not a thing but I guess seeming like you are super rich 200 years ago would have been pretty easy nobody had much finding some gold and selling it for 500 bucks would be more money than some people get in thier whole life. Definitely not millions more like buying some new clothes and a farm and partying a bit. The wealth gap wasn't like it is today
Dear Miss Kat, Don't blame yourself for his situation. You, beautiful youth, have nothing to blame. Your only, if ever, perceivable, fault was resultant of your pure innocence; therefore loving and believing such a monster sans Life experience.
She didn't seem to have right mindset to get to the bottom of what happened. Based on my leadership experience with people like her, her investigation wouldn't find any fault with her agency and if there is no fault, then nothing changes.
Over the top sensationalist BBC history unit. The music and the voiceover! Come on who are you kidding. This could have been approached with a bit more gravitas. As for the existence of King Arthur ? Well historically speaking there is no less fable here than the birth death and resurrection of Christ.
Yahweh deity displeased reasonable mistake logical exception regular fallacy single fallacy mathematical error illusion inconsistency casuistry logical mistake execution type error paradox ambiguity enigma catch-22 no-win situation dilemma King Arthur is fiction dabble idle play be amateur fiddle with muck around I'm just having a laugh
Decided to toss this video on tonight to watch with my boyfriend. I had no idea Mel Fischer and the Atocha were a featured part. I was wearing my Atocha pendant at that very moment. I have one of Mel Fischer's reproduction coins made of silver removed from the wreck. I was lucky enough to visit the museum years ago and getting a shipwreck pendant was the only think my 15 year old brain could fixate on for that trip. It's been very dear to me ever since.
0:24 King Author's bones
48:39 Lost Dutchman's gold mine
1:40:05 Garden of Eden
2:29:57 Our Lady of Atocha (lost Spanish treasure galleon)
I love King Arthur's lore and myths. His resting place is unique.
Except it's not his resting place, because he's wholly legendary, combined with the historical deeds of Ambrosius Aurelianus and a ton of fictional aspects like the sword in the stone.
He rests in our hearts
Swords were poured in a stone mould and WAS drawn out of the stone mould
@terrymcnee3568 well that's new... ive never heard of swords being poured in a mould in my 50+ years but happy for you to present your evidence 👍🇮🇪
@skepticalbadger It's not known if the deeds of Ambrosius Aureleus are the inspiration for Arthur. It has been wondered but not at all fact. There could well have been an Arthur, maybe inspired by others deeds, or just a completely made up figure.
As an Asian, I believe some of our legendary fighters and commanders exist, in particular Lu Bu who was considered the premier warlord and individual with the greatest martial prowess, despite having no remains as evidence.
In regards to Arthur, his existence is most likely as a Romano British warlord as Roman history does not document about him.
Therefore the legends about him are probably pointing to one individual that had a group of knights or elite cavalry bodyguards which could be the late Roman military type of commander. The late Romans used heavy cavalry and lancers like the sarmatians as elite auxiliaries.
The late Romans also had more emphasis on armored cavalrymen in the Scolae system. So the Romano British had inherited that military Organization and transferred that into the Arthurian legends based off history being passed down by word of mouth due to the dark ages
If you haven't already read them, you might enjoy a series of historical fiction books written by Jack Whyte...the first book is called The Skystone. It begins as the Roman legions are leaving Britain and some officers set up what will become their own fortified village. Eventually the series nears Arthurian legend territory...it's well written and describes the sort of Romano British version of events you mention.
Exactly he might be some general fighting for or against Romans .rest is myth
Lu Kang is real
I think you are probably right. Although religions have been started with less evidence, so it could just be a fairytale. An ideal monarch invented in the early Middle Ages
It would be super cool if they extracted the dna of this body presumed to be King Arthur, to see where the descendants are. It would also be cool to do a modern analysis to determine what he would have looked like! History + anthropology + modern technology = (imo) the only good way to use technology!
It’s just a myth the celts made up about a king who defeated the Anglo saxons
I think they already did that but they don’t tell .. remember history is not told to us completely with all of the truth.. only what they consider we should know.. as all the books of knowledge are all destroyed.. I don’t think so 😅
3:30 "Arthur is mortally wounded and is taken to Avalon to heal his wounds." Guy doesn't know that mortally wound means that you die from your wounds.
Arthur is more than likely an amalgamation of several different monarchs or leaders.
Kind of like Charlemagne,or Stalin?Either it's one clear person or a single story about one fictional person
@@wirelessone2986please, share how you reached that dichotomy. It’s been assumed as an amalgamation for time.
Most probably he was a reference to a Celtic hero during Roman era
Arthur was real, and one of the few original Male "Britons" to be King, post 5th Century, they were all Germanic, and, except for Diana's son's, they still are.
@ contrary to any evidence, but sure!
I remember when he found it, and the later story in Nat Geo. One chain in particular had been intricately wrought.
He had been in the news enough that my family knew who he was, as did, I'm sure, many others. Generally speaking, most people knew he wanted to find Nuestra Senota de Atocha, but any progress or locations were never in the media, so everyone wondered about his efforts until the day the find was announced. There was general excitement at the notion that a "treasure hunter" had succeeded, and that of course Mel Fisher was the only one who could.
"We" keep it
At
NewARK-on-Trent
🛡🗡🛡
🤫
You would think an Academic would think to look for "the most original, oldest text, of the Genesis records", rather than a later Version with at least 3 transulations and with acknowledged mistransulations and misinterpretations.
The 9ldest records are the Sumerian Cuneiform Tablets then the Old Hebrew Texts. Those in modern times have undergone known edits
Even if we accept that a pre industrial pre wheel civilization working with bronze could precision cut and smooth granite with such perfection, we also need to know the method they used to drill these blocks, often all the way through. Interestingly we see this in ancient Egyptian ruins. If we're so convinced we have the answers, then we would easily be able to demonstrate the technique but we can't, because we don't know.
The video is very meaningful; thank you for sharing such interesting things. The search for King Arthur's bones is truly fascinating.
Just here to sleep
This is not good history. Radford absolutely did NOT find the grave that the monks had excavated. The same updated research that you reference at the end (Gilchrist & Green, 2015) shows that it was a pit, not a grave, and was not of the right date "We must conclude that there is no archaeological evidence to support Radford’s claim that he located the 1191 exhumation site of the graves that were believed to be those of King Arthur and Queen Guinevere.”
Also, the fact that Glastonbury as a site was later proven to date to the 6th century is neither here nor there for Arthur nor even the grave that was excavated. You'd have to show that the 'Tintagel ware' came from that context to know that the monks had really excavated a 'Dark Age' prestige grave. Even then, the 'find' of the lead cross is so clearly a hoax - not the first perpetrated by those monks.
Not clay or dirt, they were "Earth bound" which meant of Earth. This is mistranslated several times, even with Caine.
My back garden, there was no Arthur, theres no bones, just a collection of myths
Just as wild an opinion as believing there was a king arthur seeing as no one Alive today knows, to scoff and act like you have the answers is just as dumb no?
So, who was real in 5th century Britain? Someone must have been alive somewhere doing something. There is absolutely no reason to believe that the legends were not based on a probably far more compelling reality.
@@stanleyshannon4408 in the fifth century, no huge castles, no knights in shining armour , no magic swords, etc etc the King Arthur myth was a medieval creation, enlarged by Germanic myths, (Wagner's got a lot to answer for). Likewise the film Excalibur which although I love it, it's sheer fantasy. The KA myth is just another creationist myth ask n to 000's of pictorial myths all over the world, who made up stories to explain reality, the ultimate being JC superstar !
@@thatwilldonicely1314 so, between Patrick writing in the late 4th century about people doing stuff in Britain and Gildas writing in the early 6th century about people doing stuff in Britain during the 5th century, and various European writers writing about British people doing stuff in Britain, your hypothesis is that actually no one was doing anything because they didn't have any shiny armor? Everything was just made up later after they had shiny armor again?
@@thatwilldonicely1314 how about Coel Hen , Urien, Cunedda, et al, did they have no shiny armor? No fortified central community to live in ? They just lived under rocks and went about naked?
My grandfather established the flying routes in Alaska my buddies grandfather took out three and a half tons of gold
Amazing content!
tiresome music as usual
Good luck with Eden. Even if you do manage to find it (which you won't), there are 2 cheribum stationed to fly around and watch for any who arrive. With them is a flaming sword that flies around, denying all men entrance.
Coming next; The hunt for Santa's ice palace, the Tooth Fairy's pile of teeth and the Easter Bunny's chocolate egg factory.
😄 Can't wait! LOL
I want the chocolate factory!
😂
Oh, you really need to watch The Hogfather!
Nail on head🤣
He's buried next to the Unicorn close to the fairies at the end of the garden
Surounded by the dragon skelleton
They always there is a little bit of truth in myth and legend. Its just a matter of how much of it is true.
There are no bones because, He is still alive!
There is no gold in the Superstition Mountains. Its been 160 years and still has never been found. The mountains are very haunted though.
Scientists are supposed to follow facts to come up with hypothesis. Not not deside what the answer is and put facts together to prove their hypothesis
Maybe Henry VIII ate him.
I think he did!
Then he took poor sickly Arthur’s young Spanish bride, married her for himself, had a daughter with her and a few stillborn children, divorced her for illegitimate reasons and destroyed their lives. 😮
Wrong Arthur you say? History is written by the psychopathic blood pudding loving victorious I say!
All types of legends based in facts
Knowing humans, we tend to put more cream on them tacos. How much of this is true, I'm not sure but here I am because I have no social life lol
Lol
So if they were looking for King Arthur bones did they found the excalibur too?
Thank you ❤
King Arthur's bones were buried in Strathclyde. Edward 1st called this place Cameluk and is likely to have found them. Cameluk is an abbreviation of Cambusmaelok meaning the monastery of Saint Maelok. Isle of avalon is a island at the head of the river Avon called Louden this often gets confused with London. Saint Maelok was a cousin of Saint Patrick and a cousin of Arthur. Saint Maelok had a brother called Saint Gildas who's father was killed by Arthur. If you want to find Arthur find the locations of Ninnius's the battles of Arthur, again all in Strathclyde. Saint Maelok was exiled to Lugo Spain, so was Lancelot for 4 years that's because lancelot is lance of Lok / Luk / Loch where Lok is an abbreviation of Maelok. Saint Gildas's father was Cado / Caddow king od Strathclyde and the court of Caddow was where Guinever was first sent.
Really nice video
Was England called Albion or Britannia in the time of King Arthur?
Did Bikecentennial Trail in 1978 .. traffic is likely much worse now. The original trail books suggested you could do the trip on as little as $3.00 a day. Wonder what inflation adjusted prices would do to that. (That might be food cost only). I had a budget of $1500.00 and spent all of it back then .. total cost, including a new rear wheel. Regardless, followed you all the way. Now considering adding a pinion drive bike to the fleet. Thanks
I've got the series "V" on my computer. Great scene where a woman in a nude suit is tortured.
48 minutes of the Arthur story. then wild west goldrush.then the garden of eden...
A myth is a myth. Our media are the greatest conspiracy theorists and grifters!
often depicted wielding the sword Excalibur, might not have been a single person at all? Many historians believe that the King Arthur we know from history documentaries and tales could actually be a composite of various leaders and warriors from early medieval Britain. Over centuries, their stories merged into one epic saga, giving us the mythic king celebrated today!
Its In Sutton park king Arthur's grave , river 7 was a favourite place
A red mountain 🏔️
The over Dramatization is so unappealing. It presume the Public is all Child like, but likewise, it causes me to presume it is largely Production.
Well... its a tv show.... they're not always great
Oh dear
This damn video has got me
At the break of dawn
We set sale
For the Spanish Maine
Mi heartiez
We turned out backs to God and had to fend for ourselves thats what happened. We are lucky he gave us brains
King Arthur - a legendary British monarch
I have a rare pair of ruby slippers for sale. A dwarf with a foreign accent traded them to me for a swim in my fountain of youth.
Hmmmmm....
I thought those statues had big pretty blue eyes.
what about Lancelot and Sanal Kumaran
king
The first one's worth watching, the others are garbage.
Sunday is the first day of the week the seventh day the Sabbath is Saturday
Glastonbury or Avalon ?
Detroit
Austin
It's in Scotland lol look at the names he was a pictish warlord fighting northumbria around Lothian Merlin was a druid and guinevere is even there its well known
@@StuartAnderson-xl4bo We know 🤪
The glorified grave robbers at the end kinda ruins it.
They haven't found the island of Avalon, so... 😐
The island is known look in Scotland
He’s buried under everything that spews from Russell Brands mouth.
They're so afraid of the number 666 yet they spend 6 days of their week serving money and not God
Last week
This week
Next week...
6 6 6
So who has the latest info for the Arizona Gold mine?
A lake
01:31:01 = the height of the depression ?!
Hawk tuah
Britains most famous king ohhh Henry George I wond… Arthur …. Tf
wasn't Arthur fictional???
King Arthur is a legendary king!
The character of King Arthur is a fiction imagine by a French author of FICTIONAL STORY‼
That imaginary story, which was rewriting and reedited a lot of time in time, by a lot of different writers, which is lead us to one direction, which can be a lot of things, but Historical accuracy ain't one of it.
Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote king Arthurs he"s fiction
So about the frankincense, one, this is so not truth it embarrassing Academically. First, anyone who's studied history, especially pertaining to the bible, should know that there was an occupation alive and well back then called being a scribe. In other words, these are people who are hired to literally write down events, important events as they happen. They did not record stories. This is the most disorganized theory or explanation of how the bible and it's record was produce that I have ever heard. It's not even historically accurate. Just saying
I agree,pagan stuff in there also !!!
Arthur was a pictish warlord fighting Northumbria lol this is well known as was Myrrid or Merlin neither was his name.
He was probably Urien.
The story is watered down by paganism until it was written properly for the Bible
😅 written down properly after 1000s of years?
Ya sure 🙄
Sunday school is for the children of the fooled
Incorrect, the Epic of Gilgamesh and all other altered creation stories come from the account recorded in Gods word.
Glorified grave-robbers.
Mfer, I started eating fruity pebbles and drinking coke because of you. I would have loved to vote for you. Now Kamala gets it.
Lesser of two evils,,,,
avalon camelot pendragons ??? yeah right.. lost mine found well don;t spoil it loose it quick
Kush is not etheopia its iraq
The music is annoying, a pitty,, can't watch silenced
He wasn’t real
🏴
The church 😂
There was no King Arthur, it is mediaeval fiction c1136/8 onwards. The real Arthur is a Welsh figure, chief of Maelgwn ap Gwynedd's Teulu and nothing to do with any of this English rubbish.
What I have sent is made me believe at alot of hour store are some what reall. I seen it with my own eyes. So you are not me sn I'm not you. But I saying alot of old stories are some what true or just true.
The larger part of the Biblical Story(ies) sounding Questionable, Allagory, Metaphiric, can be far greater clarified "if they would go to the Oldest Hebrew Texts" and have these Transulated correctly The use of Versions of Biblical Texts are extremely riddled with misinterpreted content from the Greek B8ble, (Greek was 8nterpreted into Latin, later into Old English and rewritten in English the again 8bti Modern English
Between Constatine's Priests who compiled the Texts, with known edits, to become the Bible, and the Popes adjusted, the a King, and each made deletiins and edits.
The Bible truly required an Audit to the most original Texts and to be Transulated Correctly.
Earth, not dirt or clay, Humans came from Earth and whatever intervention took place. This is what DNA studies reveal too.
Beliefs that are Fear Based will result in resistance.
Fear is the Tool used to manage the masses.
Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralistand Historian
I, too, am an individual whom delves in to many facets of info and interests and "FRUIT" is the most important misinterpretation that skews general understanding! "Go forth and BE FRUITFUL" meaning to procreate and have offspring; FORBIDDEN FRUIT REFERS TO CHILDREN!!!! In my opinion, the theory of the Garden of Eden presented here isn't correct... First off, how can you banish someone from a "nature" setting out to a nature setting? A garden is where life is grown, producing "fruit" from "trees"... "eat fruit from any tree in the garden (deer, rabbit, bird, etc), but not from the tree of life/knowledge" (own genetics/species) CHILD SACRIFICE/CANNIBALLISM HAS BEEN IN HUMANITY'S HISTORY SINCE THE BEGINNING!!!! Abraham's son, for example; partaking of communion/sacrament... ritual of symbolically EATING THE BODY OF/DRINKING THE BLOOD OF... The garden was a genetic lab where mankind and livestock (redundant statement) were created... Re-read yr biblical scriptures keeping this perspective in mind and ALL THE STORIES BECOME TOO CLEAR AND OBVIOUS!!!!! Religions are a farce, worshipping egomaniacal enslavers...
Lol the old guy tried to make it sound so cool and just tossed out numbers there's absolutely now way you would pull millions in gold out of a few feet. Even if you are pulling solid gold right out of the rock a pound is 20k its not that crazy where you would be insanely rich from a few feet. Even if you were pulling like 20 pounds a foot that's still like a million. That sounded really stupid and I nerded that out a bit and you get nowhere near anything like that from gold ore you get like 60 to 80 grams per ton if you got crazy rich from one spot it would be a cave of solid gold. That's not a thing but I guess seeming like you are super rich 200 years ago would have been pretty easy nobody had much finding some gold and selling it for 500 bucks would be more money than some people get in thier whole life. Definitely not millions more like buying some new clothes and a farm and partying a bit. The wealth gap wasn't like it is today
Dear Miss Kat, Don't blame yourself for his situation.
You, beautiful youth, have nothing to blame. Your only, if ever, perceivable, fault was resultant of your pure innocence; therefore loving and believing such a monster sans Life experience.
アーサー王の骨？ 真面目な顔で冗談言ってるのか？
Utter garbage .
Not fables obviously
She didn't seem to have right mindset to get to the bottom of what happened. Based on my leadership experience with people like her, her investigation wouldn't find any fault with her agency and if there is no fault, then nothing changes.
Over the top sensationalist BBC history unit. The music and the voiceover! Come on who are you kidding. This could have been approached with a bit more gravitas. As for the existence of King Arthur ? Well historically speaking there is no less fable here than the birth death and resurrection of Christ.
Too many adds
watch on a computer and use the right browser and you get zero ads.
Yahweh deity displeased reasonable mistake logical exception regular fallacy single fallacy mathematical error illusion inconsistency casuistry logical mistake execution type error paradox ambiguity enigma catch-22 no-win situation dilemma King Arthur is fiction dabble idle play be amateur fiddle with muck around I'm just having a laugh
❤❤❤
He's not nuts he want to follow facts to find truth if that's nuts what does that say about you
Ha! I slays thighs that Adam & Eve was true and woman was to blame for all trouble!! Ha!!
BTW, India's writting system, seriously antiquaites Sumer's presentation of literacy.
This guy isn't too quick.
This is a low rent documentary. Almost EVERYTHING is ASSUMPTION.
Just like ufo videos.
He put his money where his map is 🗺
🤔 🤫 🧭 📐 👁
Tooo much admitted assumptions here. Good for propoganda, not for confident belief in their constant assumptions
6 pounds of Emeralds are worth $billion dollars 🫨I hope they find the other 64 and continue to find more of the other treasures of the Atocha