slutsky hicks.mov

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @VinishaJMulani
    @VinishaJMulani 9 років тому +1

    phantom budget line has changed our lives - thanks so much brian

  • @411vmskateboards
    @411vmskateboards 10 років тому +5

    Thank you so much for this, I was stuck on this concept for such a long time but you really helped me out!

  • @chibuzochilaka4798
    @chibuzochilaka4798 10 років тому

    You've done a fantastic job here. You are educating many through your talent. Thanks and God bless.

  • @zc8215
    @zc8215 9 років тому +1

    ssssstay on the sssssame indifference curve for the sssssubstitutiton effect for the hicksssss method
    gotem

  • @ipeters61
    @ipeters61 10 років тому +4

    I thought I was never going to understand this in class. Thanks for the video!

  • @Sarianna24
    @Sarianna24 3 роки тому

    just like that all my worries went away. Thank you

  • @berenicebajoleyva6735
    @berenicebajoleyva6735 12 років тому

    Hello Hoàng Long Võ,
    The net substition effect is always inverse to the change in the price. The cheaper a good becomes, the more we consume of it.

  • @sidd2468
    @sidd2468 10 років тому +2

    thank you thank you thank you....different youtube videos were showing different approaches and I was all confused, not sure what is the right approach, not sure which video is right but thanks to you I now know that there are 2 approaches and both are correct.......

  • @hafshapiasheridan9175
    @hafshapiasheridan9175 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much! You helped me a lot with understanding both of these concepts in only under 12 minutes!

  • @matts15
    @matts15 9 років тому

    Yep! much clearer now! thanks Brian!

  • @KhalilHomaam
    @KhalilHomaam 10 років тому +1

    in last two minutes sssame and ssssubstitution effects sound very entertaining, I will really enjoy your classes ! Hahaha

  • @parthchougule9097
    @parthchougule9097 2 роки тому

    Excellent!

  • @MosesTan168
    @MosesTan168 7 років тому

    Hi! This video is extremely helpful! Really grateful to the Brian for posting this. Can anyone help me understand further? The phantom budget constraint, is it keeping the same new price ratios under the old budget?

    • @MosesTan168
      @MosesTan168 7 років тому

      Okay to just answer my question: Since the phantom budget constraint passes through the original bundle/ the original bundle is on the phantom budget constraint this means that the old budget constraint's purchasing power is maintained, under the new price ratio.

  • @chhandacharankothari3755
    @chhandacharankothari3755 2 роки тому

    Nicely explained

  • @kbodzioch
    @kbodzioch 12 років тому +2

    thanks a lot, it's much easier to understand you than my book :)

  • @Kin971022
    @Kin971022 7 років тому

    Thank you very much.

  • @jfene72
    @jfene72 12 років тому

    excellent explanation ... thanks

  • @rebel69rebel
    @rebel69rebel 11 років тому

    Thank you so much from Spain! Very helpful!

  • @fatimaosman8584
    @fatimaosman8584 7 років тому

    Thank you very much.. this has been very helpful!! you are a great prof!

  • @hoanglongvo5077
    @hoanglongvo5077 12 років тому

    hey guys, just one question: is there any case in which we have a normal good, but when the price of that good change, the sub and the income effects move in the opposite direction?

  • @sophiak4108
    @sophiak4108 7 років тому

    thanks, your explanation is very clear and helpful!

  • @martinaamui5117
    @martinaamui5117 6 років тому

    Really good explanation! but what about the changes on the y axis?

  • @ynzsbstn
    @ynzsbstn 8 років тому +6

    I speak spanish but found your explaniation way more understable than spanish ones. thank you!

  • @DinaraRaRa
    @DinaraRaRa 8 років тому

    Great explanation! Thank you very much!

  • @1slipknotbreak
    @1slipknotbreak 12 років тому

    thanks :D n can u please explain the revealed preference theory

  • @ideanfc
    @ideanfc 3 роки тому

    thank you king !

  • @Postejim
    @Postejim 11 років тому

    Very nice video,
    I always get stuck determining whether it's an income or substitution effect.
    I believe consuming more of x1 as Px1 decreases should be called the income effect, as you now have more income to purchase more of x1.
    And likewise as you move to your higher indifference curve (IC2) you are now consuming more of x2 (substituting consumption of x1 for x2).
    This just makes more sense to me.

  • @NeerajKumar-xq3ih
    @NeerajKumar-xq3ih 8 років тому

    what is the difference between compensating variation in income and cost difference

  • @tausal1
    @tausal1 8 років тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @bartoszgiemza952
    @bartoszgiemza952 4 роки тому

    Great explanation! Thank You sooo much! :)

  • @juliofournier8644
    @juliofournier8644 11 років тому

    great, thanks

  • @Krixxization
    @Krixxization 11 років тому

    great explanation. Thanks!

  • @Emilia-fq6dp
    @Emilia-fq6dp 4 роки тому

    Great video! I have finally understood this. Thank you :)

  • @KelvinWKiger
    @KelvinWKiger 10 років тому

    Thank you soo much !

  • @tingtingzhu824
    @tingtingzhu824 9 років тому

    Great video~helps me a lot

  • @niteshtak12
    @niteshtak12 9 років тому

    Nicely explained...thanks

  • @PovilasRut
    @PovilasRut 11 років тому

    Thank you very much, explained everything

  • @abdeslambam4724
    @abdeslambam4724 9 років тому

    i'm from morocco and this was very helpful sir ty so much

  • @harunavongjenyaknan6016
    @harunavongjenyaknan6016 6 років тому

    superb

  • @ADUTIFULINDIAN
    @ADUTIFULINDIAN 9 років тому +1

    so clear...so easy nowwwww.... many thxxxxxxx

  • @aug073
    @aug073 5 років тому

    thanks from brazil

  • @dikshajain266
    @dikshajain266 7 років тому

    Very clear explanation! Thanks a ton for this :)

  • @tatamigalaxy3473
    @tatamigalaxy3473 10 років тому

    You are a saviour!!

  • @kamransafarli
    @kamransafarli 7 років тому

    Thanks a lot!

  • @Tina-bb4hz
    @Tina-bb4hz 9 років тому

    Finally! I get it! Many thanks.

  • @soyouknowit
    @soyouknowit 9 років тому

    Well explained. Thank you so much!

  • @gulsonkumarpadhy544
    @gulsonkumarpadhy544 7 років тому

    sir what is hicksian concept of Consumer's surplus

  • @AlonzoEchavarriaGarza
    @AlonzoEchavarriaGarza 9 років тому

    I need help. I would like to know the different ways I can derive the Utility function if I have budget constraints, prices and quantities.

  • @felipelourido8074
    @felipelourido8074 10 років тому

    Great video !! thank you so much for helping me understand this!!

  • @fluffyangelzx
    @fluffyangelzx 9 років тому +1

    How do we determine where the new bundle will be at on the new budget line? Does it depend on whether its a normal or inferior good?
    Also, how do we compare hicksian and slutsky in a single graph?

    • @bamfinsm
      @bamfinsm 9 років тому +1

      wisterias yes it depends if x is a normal or an inferior good and if you want to compare slutsky and hicks, you can approach by setting the utility functions as homothetic. But just take note different approaches create different outcomes :)

  • @TheKangoeroe
    @TheKangoeroe 9 років тому +1

    Hi,
    If we are talking about perfect substitutes or perfect complements, does an income/substitute effect occur?

  • @KhalilHomaam
    @KhalilHomaam 10 років тому

    You had a big whiteboard, you could accommodate both of these graphs very easily. Anyways this is a good video for understanding the concepts. Thanks

  • @huansunny8563
    @huansunny8563 10 років тому

    Thank you!!!

  • @tildabegede3280
    @tildabegede3280 7 років тому

    Well explained

  • @RACV15
    @RACV15 9 років тому

    THANKS!

  • @radhikacommunityofeconomic5396
    @radhikacommunityofeconomic5396 7 років тому

    tnks

  • @陳婉真-s8g
    @陳婉真-s8g 10 років тому

    thank u~~so clear and helps a lot!!!!

  • @mirityuy
    @mirityuy 10 років тому

    Thank you soo so much, you were extremely helpful!

  • @HemaSankarG
    @HemaSankarG 10 років тому

    thank you. so helpful

  • @srijansaxena3677
    @srijansaxena3677 9 років тому

    Thank You so much Sir.. You explained really well.. I've an exam in two days and this will help me a lot!!!! Thanks Again.. :D

  • @vegasastras5367
    @vegasastras5367 6 років тому

    Thanks mate you well certaintly be a lecturer in any univercity in the world, not like some which a tually are! Could you do the same graph explanation on income substitution effect on labour supply when tax on wage increases please. Subscribed and liked.

  • @muguku
    @muguku 8 років тому

    erokamano meaning thank you so much

  • @komsinica88
    @komsinica88 12 років тому

    this is exellent.thank u :)

  • @sirslaughter00
    @sirslaughter00 7 років тому

    What is the point of using subscripts if you don't even use them to differentiate between points. Also why use x1 and x2 instead of x and y

  • @dirkneuhauser8213
    @dirkneuhauser8213 10 років тому

    thanks, that really clarified.

  • @esraozturk9269
    @esraozturk9269 11 років тому

    nice video finally I understand . Thank uuu:)

  • @monikapanjiyar470
    @monikapanjiyar470 9 років тому

    thank you :)

  • @Karenvskarip
    @Karenvskarip 8 років тому

    thank you so much(:

  • @naitikgreyman
    @naitikgreyman 11 років тому

    Super fuckin awesome,understood everything

  • @nidakhan5593
    @nidakhan5593 9 років тому

    helped :)

  • @srijansaxena3677
    @srijansaxena3677 9 років тому

    Thank You so much Sir.. You explained really well.. I've an exam in two days and this will help me a lot!!!! Thanks Again.. :D

  • @Tacticalgamer2011
    @Tacticalgamer2011 5 років тому

    Thank You so much Sir.. You explained really well.. I've an exam in two days and this will help me a lot!!!! Thanks Again.. :D