After having made the mistake of watching some of the drivel posted in UA-cam and legal topics it's so refreshing to see some actual, worthwhile information around here. Very well done.
The US Supreme Court should send this articles to two law clerks at the Clerk's Office namely M. Blalock and Jeffrey Atkins this video and those who are interested in knowing more must watch my documentaries in youtube under "DAVID VS AT&T PART 11" and all previous parts under DAVID VS AT&T PART 7,8,9 & 10, how the name of the game is played at the Courts below by bribing their law clerks and Judges.
After having made the mistake of watching some of the drivel posted in UA-cam and legal topics it's so refreshing to see some actual, worthwhile information around here. Very well done.
How does subject matter jurisdiction stand with the rooker Feldman doctrine?
I'll comment when watched all.
Seems interesting for all.
The US Supreme Court should send this articles to two law clerks at the Clerk's Office namely M. Blalock and Jeffrey Atkins this video and those who are interested in knowing more must watch my documentaries in youtube under "DAVID VS AT&T PART 11" and all previous parts under DAVID VS AT&T PART 7,8,9 & 10, how the name of the game is played at the Courts below by bribing their law clerks and Judges.
I assuming this is rule 12 (b) 1 . Is this based on the merits ?
🤣
these persons are evil .
Is it really about me knowing the law.. 😂🤣. It is not... You don't comply.. 😂. There is no Order, here. Everything is dying. It's a shame..