What is so righteous about this, is that because of his title and the respect his title has accrued, everybody just sits and listens. There is no media squabbling or disrepute among the audience, just sheer attention. Beautiful.
Common sense and huge warm heart :-) "gather rich and poor, let the rich contribute to the poor is the real blessing, hard work and educate the poor to selfconfidence ... Sharing in Compassionate way" Dalai Lama is pure Love
Alejandro Cabrera That would be the ideal way to go- altruistic socialism that puts the needs and happiness of the many before the profits of the few. I want my taxes going to health and education and aged pensions, not into the pockets of armaments manufacturers and politicians.
The Dalai Lama is more a marxist then Mao ever was. But one thing is sure. Tibet was a feudal monarchy when the Chinese invaded it. They said that they would liberate Tibetans but they did not. China did not brought socialism, they brought colonialism. Sure some things were improved like education and literature. But Maoist China wanted to change people by force and not by debates. As revolutionary socialists we support a democratic Tibet, free from feudalism, colonialism and capitalism.
May the Dalai Lama live long and continue to propegate Dharma to the world. May politics stop to hinder religion and be the causes of much SUFFERING in the world!
Regardless of whatever the Dalai Lama has done or not done, he has singlehandedly brought Buddhism to many people, and made the holy practice of Dorje Shugden the most well known in the world. Thank you Dalai Lama! Happy losar!
China was never actually a socialist country Mao's revolution was Stalinist which although nominally socialist was socialist in the same way that the Nazis were socialists - in name only. The Stalinists also called themselves democrats but they were in fact anything but, neither were they socialists.
Not enough people- particularly in the USA- understand the difference between socialism and capitalism (some people even equate socialism with Nazi style national socialism). Altruistic socialism that underpins a capitalist market can work to minimise that gap between rich and poor and provide support, particularly in the realm of health and education. The state should retain control of assets and resources that people NEED so corporations cannot exploit society by holding workers and citizens to ransom.
There's no such thing as "altruistic socialism", in the same way there's no "democratic socialism" or any other label on socialism, to make it pass. When people equate socialism with Nazi style national socialism are doing it with a good reason. As always, in Nazi Germany a big state retained control of assets and resources that were needed for the Nazi agenda. That socialism just had a different label, pointing to an ultra-nationalism and racism. Socialism in East Europe was a sort of "altruistic socialism", was building "a fair society". I know it, because I lived it. Stop painting over a rusted system, hoping that somebody born yesterday will believe in the most evil and destructive system that ever existed in the human history. Nobody talks about the overall raising standard of living that capitalism brings, but only about how capitalism fails at a task that wasn't it's own. If there's a big gap between rich and poor in China, as Dalai Lama said, maybe bigger than in West, it shows the "altruism" of an other socialist regime. Centralized government becomes bureaucratic and is interested just to preserve power. There's such a naivety to think that a socialist regime will be "altruistic" and level the ground, because is good hearted. You don't seem to understand a lot about human nature. Power corrupts, more power, more corruption, they go hand in hand. Only capitalism can convert a self-interest private enterprise into a value with a social benefit. You don't need socialism for a more fair distribution of wealth, but good social policies. You can't have in the same sentence socialism and capitalist markets, otherwise you have what Dalai Lama said, a Communist Party without a Communist ideology. It's ridiculous and shameful that socialists are always complaining about the capitalist cow, that the cow doesn't give enough milk, or doesn't give milk at a certain time, or that the cow doesn't throw the milk in their bucket and so on. But they don't bring their cow. When they bring it, millions die or live in poverty for ever.
plat·i·tude Pronunciation: \ˈpla-tə-ˌtüd, -ˌtyüd\ Function: noun Etymology: French, from plat flat, dull Date: 1812 1 : the quality or state of being dull or insipid 2 : a banal, trite, or stale remark
Not true. The Scandinavian countries have been very successful in adding more socialism to their otherwise capitalistic countries. Over and over again they come high in studies about quality of life. Total free markets exclude tons of people from services that they need like health care and social safety nets (this is important since capitalism always will have some degree of unemployment, it is even encouraged to create a more dynamic labor market)
The now 58 people who disliked this video have not listened to the words of the Dalai Lama. The problem with not listening is the fact that they display their intolerance for all the world to see. We have to have an awakening, this must consist of an awareness that we are all one. No one person is above another, no ruling class is necessary for the governance of the world. Please consider the following: We are all one. The intolerance of the rich and ruling elite is apparent to all to see.
He's right, the main issue is not a conflict of ideologies, but one of inequality. Both capitalism and collectivism have solutions for economic inequality, but people pick ideologies and stick with them and support the leaders of the movements regardless of what social changes are being made. Actions that strengthen society should not be grouped by ideology, because that limits their ability to be accepted by society.
"From the richer side, compassionately help them, provide them material to that they provide self confidence. The other side more hard work with self confidence."
Bless the Dalai Lama! Here, he basically says that while income inequality is bad, Socialism as a cure causes resentment and anger. It's better, to have the wealthy under capitalism "share the wealth" voluntarily through compassion and a sense of global responsibility than through the FORCED sharing of Socialism. This is how one would think true Buddhists would should view things.
@Someideasandstuff That's not what the Dalai meant. The Dalai says to be content with what you have, and appreciate it. He didn't say anything about continue on with your ways to reach greater heights. I'm Buddhist, I appreciate what I have, and I strive to reach new heights because that's how life works. Being content doesn't mean you have to stop there.
one last thing and then you can fill in the blanks on your own. Two quotes that have become the commonly accepted foundation of America. "United We Stand Divided We Fall." and "We are only as strong as our weakest link."
From what I gather you're one steady person who knows what life is really about, and If more people like us were willing to come together and make our voices heard then the word of reason could spread and the possibility of change, true change, could be more than an idealistic thought but a reality. It'll take a lot of hashing out of the details, I'm not claiming to have all the answers but if we're not willing to consider an alternative nothing will ever change.
This is the greatest human I have encountered. It is time for the world to get over the religious nonsense and hatred, and he is the only world leader I hear with an answer. Gandhi said " god has no religion".
Well said. It is frustrating that many will blame current conditions on capitalism with out a true understanding of capitalism. Currently there is less and less capitalism out there including the US and more and more socialism. The accusation that Corporatism is capitalism is way off base. It is difficult to be altruistic in a socialist society because so many feel as if they are being robbed of their income and creates resentment by devaluing individuals. Altruism has to be from the individual.
@MrProoda, no one is saying that all the poor are lazy. My point is that the Dalai Lama's views are against taking money from the rich and giving to the poor (social welfare). He wants the rich to invest in education & facilities, and for the poor to work hard instead of getting frustrated and bitter. If you listen to it again from 5 minutes onwards - you'll see what I mean.
Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.
LISTEN to what he says from 5:00 into it. The way to close the gap is for the POOR to WORK HARD instead of whinging, and for the rich to provide Education facilities. AMAZING I didn't think I'd head this from the Dalai Lama. . Thumbs up for this video, and thumbs down to all the Socialists leaving comments here, thinking he supports them.
@MiXiaoPa Bad grammar there. First off, I love China, I'm Buddhist and I respect the Dalai lama, greatly. Take the time to heed his advice and you will feel happier and content with life. Second, I'm not to sure if China has enough economic strength to "win", a last exchange trip my friends went on. They were shocked to find out that some students there didn't know what a private school is.
This man is very wise. Change starts and ends with the individual. Socialism isn't going to help the poor, people helping the poor will help the poor. We must not rely on systems, leaders, and 'isms' to change the world. We must rely on our own compassion. This is the only way true change will happen.
It wasn't just Obama who recognized this problem, but I do have to salute him for openly addressing it seeing how most politicians are scared to address hot topics as such.
I didn't hear it that way. He said income disparity causes resentment and anger (using Washington DC as an example). Those with wealth can gain the greatest blessing if they share it. Those without should transform their resentment into effort. He importantly said it matters little if we call a system capitalist or socialist. What matters is if people in the society are suffering.
@LibertyDownUnder I was only talking about economic regulations/taxations not other forms of 'control'. Government is never supposed to control those arbitrary factors I was talking about previously. Welfare to those who are not adversely affected by arbitrary factors but are just worse off because of their own IS in fact very stupid. Our society is capable of recognizing what those arbitrary factors are. Also, if there's a problem with the policy, you are the government, you change it.
@achilles6822 " google search capitalism if you dont believe me " this is your sentence , it means that you rely on google solely for your comprhension and understandings of social phenomennas generaly. Capitalism is not only defined by private ownership of means of production and exchange , means of production can be also controlled and owned by STATE. China is state capitalism as North Korea,Cuba as was Ex Soviet Union. Most of Middle Eastern countries rely on Oil which is state owned.
@homer091 Did you listen to anything the Dalai Lama said? The poor hunger under every economic system. It is up to compassionate individuals to help the needy, Gifts and contributions will always be needed, but the best way to help the poor is to empower them through education.
Men will always be envious of others no matter how well off they are or how bad off they are from even their own consequences. The inventors of technology are obligated to do what they believe is right as much as the poor have an obligation do that also but that does not mean that wealth causes poor people. Moral commitment by both is required to change things. A poor person is as equally guilty of not prospering as a wealthy person is of not being charitable.
@eaodak, the Government doesn't intervene in ALL industries. But it still causes damage in the industries it DOES intervene in. Again, if you have an example of a non-profit system that has worked out for a country in the long term - please let me know.
@AlexNOSAM He's listened to because his basis of love for others and wisdom is FAR beyond those criticizing and hating him. What a far, far better world if we'd ALL listen to his words of wisdom. One doesn't need to be an "expert in economics" to KNOW that capitalism is morally wrong. You're right in not blindly following one person, but listen to smart people then seek truth yourself, You've obviously followed blindly those who say socialism is wrong, WITHOUT seeing truth.
@GanjalfDaGreen, no I haven't read his books. But if you listen from 5 minutes onwards, he clearly says Socialism is not the way to go. He opposes the re-distribution of wealth by force.
@GanjalfDaGreen, he clearly references "Socialist" at 5:00 and criticises it. I don't need to read a whole book in order to qualify for commenting on a video that has a very clear message.
As a socialist and a secular humanist I find this man's views interesting and valid. Let us not dismist any person's reality. I seek the views of the wise be they Marx, James Connolly or Budda. No single person in any single period can know all reality;. Capitalism is an invalid value system where 90% of the people lie asleep and seek goals that inrich a minority. That minority waste their time and effort seeking money. All I say is People first and things (materalism) second. seek reality,
I do my best to follow the Dalai Lama of not converting people. I am expanding my network to different areas of expertise. Please consider adding as a connection. Thanks for your time. Sincerely, Max Rafael Waller.
What i get from the Dalai Lama is that he believes government imposed socialism is wrong, while he believes we as individuals need to help our fellow men. I'll add there will always be inequities in income due to how hard or not individuals work, unless all are payed the same despite differences in quantity and value of services. Also there will always be inequities between the haves and have nots due to choices unless you take from those that made good choices and give to those that didn't.
@Ranger4564 I should clarify for anyone reading... I started out by saying Capitalism has no morals - meaning well intentioned morals, and then a day later say that Capitalism also has ethics and morals, meaning ill intentioned morals. Just wanted to clarify. Well intentioned morals aim to have a positive result for others or all. Ill intentioned morals aim to have positive results only for the self, or negative results for others, or both. Morals are rules of conduct re right / wrong.
@bartguys Bro Did you ever think to ask; Why are they poor? that is the fundamental question. Is it because of their own personal choices in life? or Is it the fault of society at large or the government? What do you think? The point is; that it is not enough to mention that people are poor, 20% of any population will always be poor. Some people don`t want to work or go to school and they end up poor. Who is to blame? I am not trying to offend, but engage in meaningful dialogue.
its not really that complicated the way you guys are making it to be!.. what he meant is really simple if everybody can watch this video and understand what hes saying we can make this a better world!.. but ego doesnt just drop that easy!. he says rich should give out some money help those who needs it! n middle class or poor people should work hard with self confidence! now whats so hard to unerstand? but our ego is too big to let this get past us right? its really simple! respect the man~
I agree with most of what you said, but please check out the video starting at about 5:31. After he says that the right way to reduce the income/wealth gap is through voluntary giving, he says "[the right way is] not [by] some of the the socialist reforms...that sometimes creates a lot of difficulties...a lot of hatred...." Yes, income disparity is bad...but the solution is NOT to FORCE people to give.
Jeez, you people are missing the whole point, this man has dedicated his entire life to peace, humanity and love. These are spiritual views not politcal even though they are on politics. That you can call such a person stupid names just shows how close-minded you really are. I feel sorry for every last one on you soulless band wagon jumpers-did you actually listen to this or hear 5 seconds and make a horrible comment?
Life should be about how much time we have left to live with each other, not, how much time do we have left till our next paycheck. We should be able to live without having to worry about food, water, health care, housing. But what troubles people is who deserves "quality?" That's what it comes down to, quality is reserved for the rich and the rich "deserve" more than the others. That's capitalism. But if you believe in "equality" then you should also believe in "quality" lives for ALL.
@PrisonerNumber9653 1st i'll start with the Five Precepts: 1. I undertake the training rule to abstain from taking life. 2. I undertake the training rule to abstain from taking what is not given. 3. I undertake the training rule to abstain from sexual misconduct. 4. I undertake the training rule to abstain from false speech. 5. I undertake the training rule to abstain from fermented drink that causes heedlessness
@LibertyDownUnder I think what he stands for here is using what we have to do what we can. He's not speaking for or against capitalism, and he's not speaking for or against socialism. Also, socialists work hard, they're not a group of free-riders. In fact, socialism encourages people to work harder, but in different ways.
Capitalism doesn't specialise in production of more important goods, the woman asking the questions for him doesn't appear to have but a rudimentary understanding. Capitalism specialises in commodities and luxury goods, perhaps. But socialist economic planning allows resources to be shifted towards important projects and societal goals like how the Soviet Union built up heavy industry and the military for defence of the country whilst making sure everyone had healthcare, education, housing, food, and so forth whilst later having shortages of consumer goods.
What he says makes sense if everyone is motivated to learn. But what do you do with people that refuse to learn (ie drop out of school), who then have kids, making their own situation worse? What do you do with people who turn to crime because its easier? In the end it his process will make no difference. But there are always grants, scholarships, etc. for motivated people.
If we are Buddhists, we believe in karma. Whatever the Dalai Lama is doing -right or wrong. It's not for us to judge because Karma will judge in the end. no one can run away from Karma. We don't have to worry about the Dalai Lama's karma. We have to worry about our own. Let's not criticise others and just keep our own practice intact.
@Nizawiza420 , according to Michael Parenti, political scientist, "old Tibet there were small numbers of farmers who subsisted as a kind of free peasantry, and perhaps an additional 10,000 people who composed the “middle-class” families of merchants, shopkeepers, and small traders. Thousands of others were beggars. There also were slaves, usually domestic servants, who owned nothing. Their offspring were born into slavery.
This man obviously see's the truth in how flawed Communism is. He also see's the truth in the worth of the individual and that the individual must be strong (in all aspects) in order for society, which is built up of individuals, to function at all. His advice wasn't to governments, but to the individuals. He believes in the individual solving their own problems.
@eaodak, Free market Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production. What we have today is 'State Capitalism' where corporations and Governments control legislation and public spending.
This is a Universe governed by free will. Irrespective of what one's views are, of any religious persuasion, I truly believe that we are ALL correct at any one point of time in our lives. The only person who judges us at our passing from this incarnation, is us. We are simply here to learn how to love, practice non judgement & to learn detachment from earthly possessions. This is where the ego plays its role. When you learn to stand back & observe your life, it changes your life incredibly!!
To all Chinese here let me ask you something: Do you even care about what the Tibetans want? Or their feelings for that matter? Do you think that if a country like China truly cares about its own people that it would treat them this way? You say Tibetans were serfs but if they were happy that way why didn't you leave them? I know you want to maintain your territorial integrity, that's why making Tibet a Special Administrative Region would be a suitable compromise between both groups.
People seem to ignore the fact that America is not pure capitalism anymore. We are a corporatism, and that is what bleeds America. The federal reserve, an institiution set up as a last resort to bail out corp. which are "too big to fail", this policy creates moral hazard. Also the ability of the fed to inject new money into the system creates bubbles which eventually must pop, resulting in catastrophe. Over regulation takes away competition and thus makes virtual monopolies.
Capitalism & Socialism, is stil alive and kicking, and thus are important issues to adress. But I would rather focus on the question, how individualism can contribute to a good society, since individualism promotes a egocentric point of view to live.
..... Life, as is, is power over not power with. Where life is a game not a gift. A constant fight and struggle to get ahead in life or stay afloat. If everyone would go to work to serve a purpose, contribute to society, knowing that they are doing their part that will be returned through the services that ever one else is providing, then everyone could live comfortable lives and not have anything to complain about. Except not getting MORE than someone else. . . . .
"so the system on paper not much important. Important is society, people, yourself as you should act according to the oneness of humanity and sense of group responsibility, sense of community. That's important.
@AlexNOSAM If you understood the common Chinese government propaganda, you would recognize Blastdogs as a likely agent who is being employed to post it online. More to your point, the Dalai Lama is given an excellent and intense education from birth, and has continued learning throughout his long years. This, plus his experiences have led many even outside his religion and culture to value his council on many matters. I do not believe in reincarnation, but I have recognized this man's wisdom.
In response to @PrisonerNumber9653 In a capitalist society there will always be rich and poor people. The cream rises to the top. More capable, productive people get paid more than the less capable, productive. That's the way it is in ANY political/ economic/social system. Period. Most "rich" people are self made. They worked hard AND smart, saved their money and invested it wisely in COMPANIES, usually their companies. Success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration.
@MultiSmartass1 You're not listening. I said it was almost completely socialized. The reform bill only takes us one step closer. Open your eyes! Just because we didn't go from completely free market to completely socialized in one step doesn't mean it isn't happening. The poor do share in the benefits because their purchasing power is increased. Capitalism is designed exactly to help the poor and that's what it does best-it's the best spread the wealth system devised.
I completely agree. From a Christian viewpoint... in the book of Acts, the people sold there possessions and gave to whoever was in need. Some people say that is socialism, but I have to remind them that the government had nothing to do with it.
@Achilles9924, if the value of labour is determined by the state - then this is not a voluntary system. And where exactly can a US citizen leave to if he wishes to keep his freedom?
Granted he speaks with a heavy accent, but I find his line of argument pretty easy to follow. Going by your comment, I assume English isn't your first language either. Maybe that is also a factor making it a bit more difficult for you?
Capitalism is an economic system based on the use of currency to exchange resources and is therefore a monetary economy. Communism is an economic system based on the sharing of resources without the use of currency and is therefore a resource based economy.
@GanjalfDaGreen, I have no problem with voluntary associations, but this isn't the issue in this video. In Socialist countries - these associations are not voluntary. In free market Capitalist countries - a group of people can get together and chose a life of sharing.
Thats right! But i think that socialism with democracy is the step forward. Dalai Lama talk about that there should not be so big difference between rich and poor. He says that there should not be so much Inequality. And thats right. And the socialism in China does not help. Thats autoritarian Socialism. But thats not good. But neither is socialdemocracy or Liberalism. Or fascism or conservatism. It is democracy and Socialism that will make the different! ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE! PEACE!
@PrisonerNumber9653 I believe in your comment, if your suggesting Communism it doesn't work, niether does its opposite however. Extreme political parties require oppression and a totalitarian regime to survive as has been seen in Russia, China, Germany. Socialism is differant (socialism is not Communism people). It seeks to lesson that gap between rich and poor but never believes it can eradicate it entirely. It runs on a moderate political party, because of this it is representative.
@LibertyDownUnder Well, I got the sense in the entire video that when he refers to socialism, he's referencing from failed incarnations like the soviet union. He also seems to be misrepresenting Communist ideology just a tad bit more by referring to China, which has never been a Communist nation. So, I don't think he's criticizing socialism as much as he's criticizing the incarnations of socialism that have failed.
@Achilles9924, I read your comments and have no clue what you mean. In a truly free society - you can do as you wish. In true Socialism - you cannot. Movements who try to force Socialism on a country - don't really leave anything as 'voluntary'. In a free society, you are free to get together with some friends / family and create a Socilaist community - but not vice versa.
"Socialism, in a humanitarian and environmental way, is the best way to go." I think the best future sulotion would be, rather than socialism, a stateless anarchy with a resource based economy.
@SaffuriousOne Oh! it's just an opinion? Where did he work when he worked for a living? Where did he live when he was on his own taking care of himself? What community was he just another member of. Do you know the difference between fact and opinion? I'm not the holier than thou one. It's the need to worship and be worshipped that's at the heart of most of the human suffering in history. Anyone can sit around all day and think of nice things to say.
Thanks for sharing. I find it pleasant and amusing that I was watching Rush videos - one of my favorite bands and now I have found the Dalai Lama; he or his office has even Twittered me recently. I'm glad but I'm not sure if I did anything. This man is "the Pope of Buddhism", or the Hierophant for occultists.
I think you're on the right track there. But as far as the perfect system and being as wise and perfect as the universe. In order to create such a system we don't have to know everything the universe has to know, we simply must realize that we and the universe are one. From there we can grow to become a more compassionate human race and work together to create a system of true equality.
whether you believe in Buddhism or not you have to admit this guy is a mega positive influence in the world.
You can tell the Dalai Lama is 100% compasssion and love , a teacher everyone could gain compassion or love from ,I admire this man very much
What is so righteous about this, is that because of his title and the respect his title has accrued, everybody just sits and listens. There is no media squabbling or disrepute among the audience, just sheer attention. Beautiful.
Not because of his title, because of him.
How enlightening! He thinks outside the box, so to speak, from a set of values based on pure reason, mixed with compassion. Blessings!
Common sense and huge warm heart :-)
"gather rich and poor, let the rich contribute to the poor is the real blessing, hard work and educate the poor to selfconfidence ... Sharing in Compassionate way"
Dalai Lama is pure Love
It's all about finding the balance between capitalism and Marxism - socialism.
So provide higher education and healthcare to all.
Alejandro Cabrera That would be the ideal way to go- altruistic socialism that puts the needs and happiness of the many before the profits of the few. I want my taxes going to health and education and aged pensions, not into the pockets of armaments manufacturers and politicians.
The Dalai Lama is more a marxist then Mao ever was. But one thing is sure. Tibet was a feudal monarchy when the Chinese invaded it. They said that they would liberate Tibetans but they did not. China did not brought socialism, they brought colonialism. Sure some things were improved like education and literature. But Maoist China wanted to change people by force and not by debates. As revolutionary socialists we support a democratic Tibet, free from feudalism, colonialism and capitalism.
May the Dalai Lama live long and continue to propegate Dharma to the world.
May politics stop to hinder religion and be the causes of much SUFFERING in the world!
Regardless of whatever the Dalai Lama has done or not done, he has singlehandedly brought Buddhism to many people, and made the holy practice of Dorje Shugden the most well known in the world. Thank you Dalai Lama! Happy losar!
China was never actually a socialist country Mao's revolution was Stalinist which although nominally socialist was socialist in the same way that the Nazis were socialists - in name only. The Stalinists also called themselves democrats but they were in fact anything but, neither were they socialists.
Not enough people- particularly in the USA- understand the difference between socialism and capitalism (some people even equate socialism with Nazi style national socialism).
Altruistic socialism that underpins a capitalist market can work to minimise that gap between rich and poor and provide support, particularly in the realm of health and education. The state should retain control of assets and resources that people NEED so corporations cannot exploit society by holding workers and citizens to ransom.
There's no such thing as "altruistic socialism", in the same way there's no "democratic socialism" or any other label on socialism, to make it pass. When people equate socialism with Nazi style national socialism are doing it with a good reason.
As always, in Nazi Germany a big state retained control of assets and resources that were needed for the Nazi agenda.
That socialism just had a different label, pointing to an ultra-nationalism and racism. Socialism in East Europe was a sort of "altruistic socialism", was building "a fair society". I know it, because I lived it. Stop painting over a rusted system, hoping that somebody born yesterday will believe in the most evil and destructive system that ever existed in the human history.
Nobody talks about the overall raising standard of living that capitalism brings, but only about how capitalism fails at a task that wasn't it's own. If there's a big gap between rich and poor in China, as Dalai Lama said, maybe bigger than in West, it shows the "altruism" of an other socialist regime. Centralized government becomes bureaucratic and is interested just to preserve power.
There's such a naivety to think that a socialist regime will be "altruistic" and level the ground, because is good hearted. You don't seem to understand a lot about human nature. Power corrupts, more power, more corruption, they go hand in hand. Only capitalism can convert a self-interest private enterprise into a value with a social benefit. You don't need socialism for a more fair distribution of wealth, but good social policies. You can't have in the same sentence socialism and capitalist markets, otherwise you have what Dalai Lama said, a Communist Party without a Communist ideology.
It's ridiculous and shameful that socialists are always complaining about the capitalist cow, that the cow doesn't give enough milk, or doesn't give milk at a certain time, or that the cow doesn't throw the milk in their bucket and so on.
But they don't bring their cow. When they bring it, millions die or live in poverty for ever.
plat·i·tude
Pronunciation:
\ˈpla-tə-ˌtüd, -ˌtyüd\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French, from plat flat, dull
Date:
1812
1 : the quality or state of being dull or insipid
2 : a banal, trite, or stale remark
Not true. The Scandinavian countries have been very successful in adding more socialism to their otherwise capitalistic countries. Over and over again they come high in studies about quality of life.
Total free markets exclude tons of people from services that they need like health care and social safety nets (this is important since capitalism always will have some degree of unemployment, it is even encouraged to create a more dynamic labor market)
The now 58 people who disliked this video have not listened to the words of the Dalai Lama. The problem with not listening is the fact that they display their intolerance for all the world to see. We have to have an awakening, this must consist of an awareness that we are all one. No one person is above another, no ruling class is necessary for the governance of the world. Please consider the following: We are all one. The intolerance of the rich and ruling elite is apparent to all to see.
He's right, the main issue is not a conflict of ideologies, but one of inequality. Both capitalism and collectivism have solutions for economic inequality, but people pick ideologies and stick with them and support the leaders of the movements regardless of what social changes are being made. Actions that strengthen society should not be grouped by ideology, because that limits their ability to be accepted by society.
"From the richer side, compassionately help them, provide them material to that they provide self confidence. The other side more hard work with self confidence."
hte dalai lama is the universal language of peace and love.
Bless the Dalai Lama! Here, he basically says that while income inequality is bad, Socialism as a cure causes resentment and anger. It's better, to have the wealthy under capitalism "share the wealth" voluntarily through compassion and a sense of global responsibility than through the FORCED sharing of Socialism. This is how one would think true Buddhists would should view things.
@Someideasandstuff
That's not what the Dalai meant. The Dalai says to be content with what you have, and appreciate it. He didn't say anything about continue on with your ways to reach greater heights.
I'm Buddhist, I appreciate what I have, and I strive to reach new heights because that's how life works. Being content doesn't mean you have to stop there.
one last thing and then you can fill in the blanks on your own. Two quotes that have become the commonly accepted foundation of America. "United We Stand Divided We Fall." and "We are only as strong as our weakest link."
From what I gather you're one steady person who knows what life is really about, and If more people like us were willing to come together and make our voices heard then the word of reason could spread and the possibility of change, true change, could be more than an idealistic thought but a reality. It'll take a lot of hashing out of the details, I'm not claiming to have all the answers but if we're not willing to consider an alternative nothing will ever change.
i think the Dalai is something like a hero. I dont care about what others says. He is a freedom fighter, without fight:-)
This is the greatest human I have encountered.
It is time for the world to get over the religious nonsense and hatred,
and he is the only world leader I hear with an answer.
Gandhi said " god has no religion".
Well said. It is frustrating that many will blame current conditions on capitalism with out a true understanding of capitalism. Currently there is less and less capitalism out there including the US and more and more socialism. The accusation that Corporatism is capitalism is way off base. It is difficult to be altruistic in a socialist society because so many feel as if they are being robbed of their income and creates resentment by devaluing individuals. Altruism has to be from the individual.
@MrProoda, no one is saying that all the poor are lazy.
My point is that the Dalai Lama's views are against taking money from the rich and giving to the poor (social welfare).
He wants the rich to invest in education & facilities, and for the poor to work hard instead of getting frustrated and bitter.
If you listen to it again from 5 minutes onwards - you'll see what I mean.
Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.
He's a wonderful man and makes some good points. Pretty incredible for someone who's had his country butchered.
LISTEN to what he says from 5:00 into it.
The way to close the gap is for the POOR to WORK HARD instead of whinging, and for the rich to provide Education facilities.
AMAZING I didn't think I'd head this from the Dalai Lama.
.
Thumbs up for this video, and thumbs down to all the Socialists leaving comments here, thinking he supports them.
@MiXiaoPa
Bad grammar there.
First off, I love China, I'm Buddhist and I respect the Dalai lama, greatly. Take the time to heed his advice and you will feel happier and content with life.
Second, I'm not to sure if China has enough economic strength to "win", a last exchange trip my friends went on. They were shocked to find out that some students there didn't know what a private school is.
This man is very wise.
Change starts and ends with the individual. Socialism isn't going to help the poor, people helping the poor will help the poor. We must not rely on systems, leaders, and 'isms' to change the world. We must rely on our own compassion. This is the only way true change will happen.
It wasn't just Obama who recognized this problem, but I do have to salute him for openly addressing it seeing how most politicians are scared to address hot topics as such.
I didn't hear it that way. He said income disparity causes resentment and anger (using Washington DC as an example). Those with wealth can gain the greatest blessing if they share it. Those without should transform their resentment into effort. He importantly said it matters little if we call a system capitalist or socialist. What matters is if people in the society are suffering.
@LibertyDownUnder I was only talking about economic regulations/taxations not other forms of 'control'. Government is never supposed to control those arbitrary factors I was talking about previously. Welfare to those who are not adversely affected by arbitrary factors but are just worse off because of their own IS in fact very stupid. Our society is capable of recognizing what those arbitrary factors are. Also, if there's a problem with the policy, you are the government, you change it.
@achilles6822 " google search capitalism if you dont believe me " this is your sentence , it means that you rely on google solely for your comprhension and understandings of social phenomennas generaly. Capitalism is not only defined by private ownership of means of production and exchange , means of production can be also controlled and owned by STATE. China is state capitalism as North Korea,Cuba as was Ex Soviet Union. Most of Middle Eastern countries rely on Oil which is state owned.
If you haven't read it already. I made some comments below on the page here and I wonder you'd think about it.
@homer091
Did you listen to anything the Dalai Lama said?
The poor hunger under every economic system. It is up to compassionate individuals to help the needy, Gifts and contributions will always be needed, but the best way to help the poor is to empower them through education.
i like when i see stacks of paragraphs in the comments on videos like this.
Men will always be envious of others no matter how well off they are or how bad off they are from even their own consequences.
The inventors of technology are obligated to do what they believe is right as much as the poor have an obligation do that also but that does not mean that wealth causes poor people. Moral commitment by both is required to change things.
A poor person is as equally guilty of not prospering as a wealthy person is of not being charitable.
@eaodak, the Government doesn't intervene in ALL industries. But it still causes damage in the industries it DOES intervene in.
Again, if you have an example of a non-profit system that has worked out for a country in the long term - please let me know.
@AlexNOSAM He's listened to because his basis of love for others and wisdom is FAR beyond those criticizing and hating him. What a far, far better world if we'd ALL listen to his words of wisdom.
One doesn't need to be an "expert in economics" to KNOW that capitalism is morally wrong.
You're right in not blindly following one person, but listen to smart people then seek truth yourself, You've obviously followed blindly those who say socialism is wrong, WITHOUT seeing truth.
@GanjalfDaGreen, no I haven't read his books. But if you listen from 5 minutes onwards, he clearly says Socialism is not the way to go.
He opposes the re-distribution of wealth by force.
@GanjalfDaGreen, he clearly references "Socialist" at 5:00 and criticises it.
I don't need to read a whole book in order to qualify for commenting on a video that has a very clear message.
As a socialist and a secular humanist I find this man's views interesting and valid. Let us not dismist any person's reality. I seek the views of the wise be they Marx, James Connolly or Budda. No single person in any single period can know all reality;. Capitalism is an invalid value system where 90% of the people lie asleep and seek goals that inrich a minority. That minority waste their time and effort seeking money. All I say is People first and things (materalism) second. seek reality,
I do my best to follow the Dalai Lama of not converting people. I am expanding my network to different areas of expertise. Please consider adding as a connection. Thanks for your time. Sincerely, Max Rafael Waller.
What i get from the Dalai Lama is that he believes government imposed socialism is wrong, while he believes we as individuals need to help our fellow men. I'll add there will always be inequities in income due to how hard or not individuals work, unless all are payed the same despite differences in quantity and value of services. Also there will always be inequities between the haves and have nots due to choices unless you take from those that made good choices and give to those that didn't.
@Ranger4564 I should clarify for anyone reading... I started out by saying Capitalism has no morals - meaning well intentioned morals, and then a day later say that Capitalism also has ethics and morals, meaning ill intentioned morals. Just wanted to clarify. Well intentioned morals aim to have a positive result for others or all. Ill intentioned morals aim to have positive results only for the self, or negative results for others, or both. Morals are rules of conduct re right / wrong.
@bartguys Bro Did you ever think to ask; Why are they poor? that is the fundamental question. Is it because of their own personal choices in life? or Is it the fault of society at large or the government? What do you think? The point is; that it is not enough to mention that people are poor, 20% of any population will always be poor. Some people don`t want to work or go to school and they end up poor. Who is to blame? I am not trying to offend, but engage in meaningful dialogue.
How does our consciousness decide that we are giving to our society compared to as much as we took from it?
its not really that complicated the way you guys are making it to be!.. what he meant is really simple if everybody can watch this video and understand what hes saying we can make this a better world!.. but ego doesnt just drop that easy!. he says rich should give out some money help those who needs it! n middle class or poor people should work hard with self confidence! now whats so hard to unerstand? but our ego is too big to let this get past us right? its really simple! respect the man~
I agree with most of what you said, but please check out the video starting at about 5:31. After he says that the right way to reduce the income/wealth gap is through voluntary giving, he says "[the right way is] not [by] some of the the socialist reforms...that sometimes creates a lot of difficulties...a lot of hatred...." Yes, income disparity is bad...but the solution is NOT to FORCE people to give.
Jeez, you people are missing the whole point, this man has dedicated his entire life to peace, humanity and love. These are spiritual views not politcal even though they are on politics. That you can call such a person stupid names just shows how close-minded you really are. I feel sorry for every last one on you soulless band wagon jumpers-did you actually listen to this or hear 5 seconds and make a horrible comment?
Life should be about how much time we have left to live with each other, not, how much time do we have left till our next paycheck. We should be able to live without having to worry about food, water, health care, housing. But what troubles people is who deserves "quality?" That's what it comes down to, quality is reserved for the rich and the rich "deserve" more than the others. That's capitalism. But if you believe in "equality" then you should also believe in "quality" lives for ALL.
@PrisonerNumber9653 1st i'll start with the Five Precepts:
1. I undertake the training rule to abstain from taking life.
2. I undertake the training rule to abstain from taking what is not given.
3. I undertake the training rule to abstain from sexual misconduct.
4. I undertake the training rule to abstain from false speech.
5. I undertake the training rule to abstain from fermented drink that causes heedlessness
@arzoyan - you missed his point altogether. He is FOR free market Capitalism. If you listen again from 5 minutes, you'll see he is against Socialism.
Well said Dalai Lama :P
Indeed, what is missing is the community sense in the people, that brings injustice.
@LibertyDownUnder
I think what he stands for here is using what we have to do what we can. He's not speaking for or against capitalism, and he's not speaking for or against socialism.
Also, socialists work hard, they're not a group of free-riders. In fact, socialism encourages people to work harder, but in different ways.
Economic hardship and inequality indeed breeds resentment and radicalism.
Based!
Why are they asking Dalai about socialism and capitalism? He is a freaking monarch!
Looked up thatchers video on socialism. a big gap between rich and poor is not a bad thing.
Capitalism doesn't specialise in production of more important goods, the woman asking the questions for him doesn't appear to have but a rudimentary understanding. Capitalism specialises in commodities and luxury goods, perhaps. But socialist economic planning allows resources to be shifted towards important projects and societal goals like how the Soviet Union built up heavy industry and the military for defence of the country whilst making sure everyone had healthcare, education, housing, food, and so forth whilst later having shortages of consumer goods.
What he says makes sense if everyone is motivated to learn. But what do you do with people that refuse to learn (ie drop out of school), who then have kids, making their own situation worse? What do you do with people who turn to crime because its easier? In the end it his process will make no difference. But there are always grants, scholarships, etc. for motivated people.
If we are Buddhists, we believe in karma. Whatever the Dalai Lama is doing -right or wrong. It's not for us to judge because Karma will judge in the end. no one can run away from Karma. We don't have to worry about the Dalai Lama's karma. We have to worry about our own. Let's not criticise others and just keep our own practice intact.
@Nizawiza420 , according to Michael Parenti, political scientist, "old Tibet there were small numbers of farmers who subsisted as a kind of free peasantry, and perhaps an additional 10,000 people who composed the “middle-class” families of merchants, shopkeepers, and small traders. Thousands of others were beggars. There also were slaves, usually domestic servants, who owned nothing. Their offspring were born into slavery.
This man obviously see's the truth in how flawed Communism is. He also see's the truth in the worth of the individual and that the individual must be strong (in all aspects) in order for society, which is built up of individuals, to function at all.
His advice wasn't to governments, but to the individuals. He believes in the individual solving their own problems.
This is truly a wise man. I wish he could have more influence on the world. Someday the world will be ruled by men such as this one.
@eaodak, Free market Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production.
What we have today is 'State Capitalism' where corporations and Governments control legislation and public spending.
This is a Universe governed by free will. Irrespective of what one's views are, of any religious persuasion, I truly believe that we are ALL correct at any one point of time in our lives. The only person who judges us at our passing from this incarnation, is us. We are simply here to learn how to love, practice non judgement & to learn detachment from earthly possessions. This is where the ego plays its role. When you learn to stand back & observe your life, it changes your life incredibly!!
To all Chinese here let me ask you something:
Do you even care about what the Tibetans want? Or their feelings for that matter?
Do you think that if a country like China truly cares about its own people that it would treat them this way?
You say Tibetans were serfs but if they were happy that way why didn't you leave them?
I know you want to maintain your territorial integrity, that's why making Tibet a Special Administrative Region would be a suitable compromise between both groups.
People seem to ignore the fact that America is not pure capitalism anymore. We are a corporatism, and that is what bleeds America. The federal reserve, an institiution set up as a last resort to bail out corp. which are "too big to fail", this policy creates moral hazard. Also the ability of the fed to inject new money into the system creates bubbles which eventually must pop, resulting in catastrophe. Over regulation takes away competition and thus makes virtual monopolies.
@arzoyan, do you want cooperation by force (Socialism)?
Or by choice (free market Capitalism)?
Capitalism & Socialism, is stil alive and kicking, and thus are important issues to adress. But I would rather focus on the question, how individualism can contribute to a good society, since individualism promotes a egocentric point of view to live.
..... Life, as is, is power over not power with. Where life is a game not a gift. A constant fight and struggle to get ahead in life or stay afloat. If everyone would go to work to serve a purpose, contribute to society, knowing that they are doing their part that will be returned through the services that ever one else is providing, then everyone could live comfortable lives and not have anything to complain about. Except not getting MORE than someone else. . . . .
"so the system on paper not much important. Important is society, people, yourself as you should act according to the oneness of humanity and sense of group responsibility, sense of community. That's important.
@AlexNOSAM If you understood the common Chinese government propaganda, you would recognize Blastdogs as a likely agent who is being employed to post it online. More to your point, the Dalai Lama is given an excellent and intense education from birth, and has continued learning throughout his long years. This, plus his experiences have led many even outside his religion and culture to value his council on many matters. I do not believe in reincarnation, but I have recognized this man's wisdom.
his view and voice is full of Wisdom its nice to lisen to. lol
In response to @PrisonerNumber9653
In a capitalist society there will always be rich and poor people. The cream rises to the top. More capable, productive people get paid more than the less capable, productive. That's the way it is in ANY political/ economic/social system. Period. Most "rich" people are self made. They worked hard AND smart, saved their money and invested it wisely in COMPANIES, usually their companies. Success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration.
Dalai lama can talk what he want from the comfort of his sofa...but people in the field know what life actually is.
@MultiSmartass1 You're not listening. I said it was almost completely socialized. The reform bill only takes us one step closer. Open your eyes! Just because we didn't go from completely free market to completely socialized in one step doesn't mean it isn't happening.
The poor do share in the benefits because their purchasing power is increased. Capitalism is designed exactly to help the poor and that's what it does best-it's the best spread the wealth system devised.
Yay! Yay! Yay!
I have watched 100's of politicians and 1000's of you-tubers and armchair philosophers. This guy gets it. Understands.
I completely agree. From a Christian viewpoint... in the book of Acts, the people sold there possessions and gave to whoever was in need. Some people say that is socialism, but I have to remind them that the government had nothing to do with it.
@Achilles9924, if the value of labour is determined by the state - then this is not a voluntary system. And where exactly can a US citizen leave to if he wishes to keep his freedom?
You cannot seek (let alone achieve) Enlightenment without Freedom and Liberty, and equal protected under the rule of law of Free Will.
Granted he speaks with a heavy accent, but I find his line of argument pretty easy to follow. Going by your comment, I assume English isn't your first language either. Maybe that is also a factor making it a bit more difficult for you?
Capitalism is an economic system based on the use of currency to exchange resources and is therefore a monetary economy. Communism is an economic system based on the sharing of resources without the use of currency and is therefore a resource based economy.
What's better? Just curious.
@GanjalfDaGreen, I have no problem with voluntary associations, but this isn't the issue in this video.
In Socialist countries - these associations are not voluntary.
In free market Capitalist countries - a group of people can get together and chose a life of sharing.
Thats right!
But i think that socialism with democracy is the step forward.
Dalai Lama talk about that there should not be so big difference between rich and poor. He says that there should not be so much Inequality. And thats right. And the socialism in China does not help. Thats autoritarian Socialism. But thats not good. But neither is socialdemocracy or Liberalism. Or fascism or conservatism.
It is democracy and Socialism that will make the different!
ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE! PEACE!
He is fully awakened.
@PrisonerNumber9653
I believe in your comment, if your suggesting Communism it doesn't work, niether does its opposite however. Extreme political parties require oppression and a totalitarian regime to survive as has been seen in Russia, China, Germany.
Socialism is differant (socialism is not Communism people). It seeks to lesson that gap between rich and poor but never believes it can eradicate it entirely. It runs on a moderate political party, because of this it is representative.
@LibertyDownUnder
Well, I got the sense in the entire video that when he refers to socialism, he's referencing from failed incarnations like the soviet union. He also seems to be misrepresenting Communist ideology just a tad bit more by referring to China, which has never been a Communist nation. So, I don't think he's criticizing socialism as much as he's criticizing the incarnations of socialism that have failed.
this video made me happy.
@Achilles9924, I read your comments and have no clue what you mean.
In a truly free society - you can do as you wish. In true Socialism - you cannot.
Movements who try to force Socialism on a country - don't really leave anything as 'voluntary'.
In a free society, you are free to get together with some friends / family and create a Socilaist community - but not vice versa.
@noblew357 Zeitgiest Movement is the greatest liberation movement of last hundred years.
If u have no weapon .U can NOT change politics,stopping rumoring
"Socialism, in a humanitarian and environmental way, is the best way to go."
I think the best future sulotion would be, rather than socialism, a stateless anarchy with a resource based economy.
@SaffuriousOne Oh! it's just an opinion? Where did he work when he worked for a living? Where did he live when he was on his own taking care of himself? What community was he just another member of. Do you know the difference between fact and opinion? I'm not the holier than thou one. It's the need to worship and be worshipped that's at the heart of most of the human suffering in history. Anyone can sit around all day and think of nice things to say.
Thanks for sharing. I find it pleasant and amusing that I was watching Rush videos - one of my favorite bands and now I have found the Dalai Lama; he or his office has even Twittered me recently. I'm glad but I'm not sure if I did anything. This man is "the Pope of Buddhism", or the Hierophant for occultists.
what a peaceful video...
I think you're on the right track there. But as far as the perfect system and being as wise and perfect as the universe. In order to create such a system we don't have to know everything the universe has to know, we simply must realize that we and the universe are one. From there we can grow to become a more compassionate human race and work together to create a system of true equality.