Visual Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 кві 2023
  • This is a short, animated visual proof of the two-dimensional Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (sometimes called Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz inequality) using the Side-angle-side formula for the area of a parallelogram.
    If you like this video, consider subscribing to the channel or consider buying me a coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/VisualPr.... Thanks!
    To see a longer (slower) version of this video, without words, check this out: • Cauchy Bunyakovsky Sch...
    This animation is based on a visual proof by Sidney H. Kung from the February 2008 issue of Mathematics Magazine (www.jstor.org/stable/27643084 - page 69).
    To learn more about animating with manim, check out:
    manim.community
    #math​ #inequality ​ #manim​ #animation​ #theorem​ #pww​ #proofwithoutwords​ #visualproof​ #proof​ #iteachmath #algebra #areas #mathematics #cauchyschwarz #algebraicidentity #mathshorts​ #mathvideo​ #mtbos

КОМЕНТАРІ • 61

  • @ruthvikas
    @ruthvikas Рік тому +79

    I love the graphical representation of maths. It just feels different and more clear.

  • @buffalonels988
    @buffalonels988 Рік тому +67

    this was real intense for me

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому +15

      too much for the shorts format? Too fast?

    • @rayansuneer
      @rayansuneer Рік тому +10

      Theres too much information going on that it's a bit hard to understand
      Maybe make this a video?

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому +13

      @@rayansuneer Here it is without words: ua-cam.com/video/mKg_gVagHy8/v-deo.html . Perhaps the "matrix" cyberpunk music might not be your style :)

    • @rayansuneer
      @rayansuneer Рік тому +9

      @@MathVisualProofs it was perfect. Down to the smallest detail

  • @Tiago-
    @Tiago- Рік тому +30

    I didn't get any of this, but the shapes were pretty

  • @realcontentgamer
    @realcontentgamer Рік тому +27

    This man is literally better than my school teachers

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому +2

      👍

    • @ts.nathan7786
      @ts.nathan7786 9 місяців тому

      First thing school teachers can not make graphical animations on blackboard.
      Secondly , they may not know the graphical representations.

  • @oliverpackham6278
    @oliverpackham6278 Рік тому +14

    I always loved dot and cross product equalities. Michael Penn has a linear algebra playlist will all sorts of cool ones. The vector dotted with itself = it's magnitude^2 is a fun and easy one you could do a short on.

  • @Zangoose_
    @Zangoose_ Рік тому +5

    This is what I needed back in college. Thanks, man

  • @rafaelrezende7953
    @rafaelrezende7953 Рік тому +3

    NEVER STOP THIS VIDEOS

  • @abdullahyasinyagmur4687
    @abdullahyasinyagmur4687 9 місяців тому +1

    This is just amazing. It's always nice to see the intuition geometrically

  • @TheCyanKiller
    @TheCyanKiller Рік тому +3

    The number of times the word absolute was said was more than the number of times a word that was not absolute was said

  • @imchillbro479
    @imchillbro479 Рік тому +6

    That's wonderful

  • @matthewbell4273
    @matthewbell4273 9 місяців тому +2

    My main takeaway was how shapes can be really pretty

  • @SeanSkyhawk
    @SeanSkyhawk Рік тому +8

    When will you be posting the Pythagoreran Theorem proof as recently published by Jackson and Johnson?

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому +4

      Is a good idea! I will see if I can get around to it. I saw a few other videos done about it, and I haven't looked into it carefully yet.

    • @SeanSkyhawk
      @SeanSkyhawk Рік тому

      @@MathVisualProofs It's quite elaborate and deals with infinite sums but in the end it's surprisingly clear and independent. As far as is known, this was the first proof that completely bypasses the so-called Pythagorean identity, which come to think of it can itself be proven via infinite series.

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому

      @@SeanSkyhawk yes I know the details. I also know there is at least one other trig proof of the Pythagorean theorem though (see cut the knot website for instance). But the new one is much nicer (uses law of sines only). It’s a great accomplishment by them for sure. I’ll see if I can figure out a way to do it justice :)

  • @viking148
    @viking148 Рік тому +1

    Lovely just lovely I wish I had you in my school

  • @user-wj1qb3qu1y
    @user-wj1qb3qu1y 8 місяців тому +1

    Wonderful proof

  • @mathematicsman7454
    @mathematicsman7454 Рік тому +2

    You are doing great like mind your descision

  • @Joffrerap
    @Joffrerap Рік тому +2

    prerequisite:
    - pythagorean theorem
    - area of a parallelogram
    - triangle inequality and absolute value property
    ok not as much as i thought.

  • @flamurtarinegjakyt3745
    @flamurtarinegjakyt3745 9 місяців тому

    I needed this for calculus II, thank you

  • @alvargd6771
    @alvargd6771 Рік тому +3

    when I saw Cauchy in the title got scared 😅 but it wasnt nearly as bad as I expected

  • @StratosFair
    @StratosFair Рік тому +2

    Ok, I have to subscribe to your channel after this

  • @asparkdeity8717
    @asparkdeity8717 Рік тому +2

    This is so beautiful! Every linear algebra proof of Cauchy-Schwarz that I have come across is so messy and always involves the determinant of some quadratic, but u couldn’t have explained this in any simpler way, using nothing more than simple trigonometry. Thank you so much

  • @Rocherz
    @Rocherz 9 місяців тому +1

    Now animate the 3D inequality *with cubes.*
    (It’s the meme of “now draw her stealling the Chaos Emeralds”, I’m neither actually asking nor demanding it.)

  • @teaaa2525
    @teaaa2525 Рік тому +1

    Very nice

  • @arvindsrinivasan424
    @arvindsrinivasan424 Рік тому +1

    I feel like this is better visualized with the vectors and using projections defined using dot products

    • @AnglandAlamehnaSwedish
      @AnglandAlamehnaSwedish Рік тому

      Woah really u musta had a protractor born in ur hands n attached to ur hip ur whole life jk

  • @mikaeo23
    @mikaeo23 9 місяців тому

    I'll watch this again when I'm sober, stoned me can't understand 😅

  • @marshelldoonan7798
    @marshelldoonan7798 9 місяців тому

    My mind blue screened

  • @javohirtursunaliyev5036
    @javohirtursunaliyev5036 Рік тому +3

    I love inequalities but didn't know any book please tell me friends inequality books😢

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому +4

      A good one for visualization is "When Less is More: Visualizing Basic Inequalities" by Roger Nelsen.

    • @robertogajim470
      @robertogajim470 Рік тому

      ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ ͡⁠°⁠ ͜⁠ʖ⁠ ͡⁠°⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

    • @robertogajim470
      @robertogajim470 Рік тому

      .⁠·⁠´⁠¯⁠`⁠(⁠>⁠▂⁠

  • @srikrishnaghosh7660
    @srikrishnaghosh7660 9 місяців тому

    I have become fan of yours. Assuming this particular equation will be dealt with only after having the idea of dot product , it is quite straight forward that,
    ||(a,b)•(x,y)||=||(a,b)||•||(x,y)|||cos(z)|

  • @robertogajim470
    @robertogajim470 Рік тому +1

    Tanks bro😮😮😮😮

  • @yeeter2785
    @yeeter2785 9 місяців тому

    damn bro explained common sense wowowowowowowowow

  • @lolzhunter
    @lolzhunter 10 місяців тому

    Oh yeah of course

  • @OmnivorousOtter101
    @OmnivorousOtter101 Рік тому +1

    Is that Mozart d minor fantasia in the background?

  • @aidenhastings6341
    @aidenhastings6341 9 місяців тому

    Is there an error when changing the inequality as sin(z) is removed? If 0

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  9 місяців тому

      When you remove the sin(z) on the right it is removing a multiplication by a number less than 1. So the equality is gone and the right hand side got larger (or stayed the same).

  • @DOLsenior
    @DOLsenior Рік тому +1

    Alrighty then

  • @aedes9902
    @aedes9902 Рік тому +2

    а Буняковский..

    • @MathVisualProofs
      @MathVisualProofs  Рік тому +1

      Yes. I should have included that. It is in the original video description (ua-cam.com/video/mKg_gVagHy8/v-deo.html)

  • @AnglandAlamehnaSwedish
    @AnglandAlamehnaSwedish Рік тому

    Dot product i didnt know i would see that. Cool as f if its the dot product from physics i didn't do it in my notebook n stop n pause n rewind a million times i got not enough notebooks gotta by some more n pens n find my dam markers for my marker white board

  • @siguy715
    @siguy715 Рік тому

    I know some of these words

  • @user-lr8od4uz1n
    @user-lr8od4uz1n Рік тому +3

    Jesus Christ......

  • @robquinnpc
    @robquinnpc 9 місяців тому

    But why? Why do any of those things? Make it applicable.

  • @regularperson5647
    @regularperson5647 Рік тому

    I'm too high for maths

  • @alessandropozzi2214
    @alessandropozzi2214 Місяць тому

    totally unintelligible explanation... awful, even knowing it this is absolutely unnecessarily complicated